312 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime fulton

Page 1

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 312 Filed: 11/07/13 1 of 4 PageID #: 5909

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.

PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-CV-103-GHD-JAD

THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS, LLC; KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION

DEFENDANTS

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF FULTON IMPROVEMENTS, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMES NOW, Defendant, Fulton Improvements, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Jacks Luciano, P.A., and files this its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, and in support of thereof would show unto the Court the following, to-wit: 1.

On October 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed their Memorandum in Support of

Response to Fulton Improvements, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc 295]. 2.

The Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s response is currently due on November 11,

3.

The Defendant respectfully requests this Court enter an Order extending their

2013.

deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s response for seven (7) days, until and including Monday, November 18, 2013. 4.

Undersigned counsel for the Defendant has contacted counsel for the Plaintiff

regarding this extension, and said counsel has no objection to this extension and has agreed to same.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.