311 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime kcsr

Page 1

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 311 Filed: 11/06/13 1 of 3 PageID #: 5906

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.

PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-103-GHD-DAS

THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS LLC; THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION

DEFENDANTS

______________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ______________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW, Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway (“KCSR”), by and through counsel, and files this its Motion for Extension of Time for it to file its reply in further support of its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc 253], and in support thereof would state unto the Court as follows, 1. Pursuant to this Court’s Order of August 2, 2013, the deadline for filing dispositive motions and motions in limine to exclude experts was October 8, 2013. On October 7, 2013, KCSR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. [Doc 253]. Under the Rules, Plaintiff’s response to KCSR’s motion was due on October 24, 2013. On October 21, 2013, this Court granted Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an extension of time until October 30, 2013, to file its response to KCSR’s motion. [Doc 279]. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, KCSR’s reply is currently due to be filed November 11, 2013. 2. Due to the demands in the schedules of counsel for KCSR and the number of pending 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
311 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime kcsr by Milton Sandy - Issuu