March Monthly Publication

Navigating Change: The Impact of New Methane Regulations on the Oil and Gas Industry

Spring is in the air, which always brings change to the oil and gas industry. The slow time of winter gives way to the hustle and bustle of the summer.

Amidst this evolving landscape, there’s a significant development in methane regulations. The EPA has published new methane rules for the oil and natural gas industry in the Federal Register, marking a pivotal moment in our journey. This announcement has initiated a 60-day window for potential legal challenges, with Texas leading the charge and others poised to follow suit.

The goal is to modify the rules to allow methane restrictions while not excessively penalizing the industry. However, it is widely known that the path to resolution may be lengthy and require patience and perseverance.

In the meantime, companies will need

to follow the rules for new wells (OOOOb) and look at methods to meet regulations for old wells (OOOOc). MOGA is hiring legal counsel to inform us of possible legal, regulatory, and legislative methods to reduce the negative impact on the industry. We are also looking into new well-site methods to utilize the unsold methane to meet the EPA requirements.

At MOGA we’re leveraging all our collective expertise to navigate the complexities of these regulations, exploring every avenue to mitigate any adverse impacts on our industry. Innovation will be key to meeting methane compliance at a reasonable cost.

In this collective endeavor, we stand united as members of MOGA. We’re driven by a shared commitment to surmounting regulatory challenges while upholding the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.

MOGA Members in Action: Some Photos Captured at the March 2024 MOGA Meeting & Luncheon

MOGA Chairman, Craig Tester (left) poses for a photo with MOGA president and CEO, Jason Geer (center), and past chairman, Brian Dorr (right).

CRACKERJACK PHOTOGRAPHY / Jamie Kirschner

Sid Jansma III., Wolverine Gas & Oil Company (left), Todd Mall, Trendwell Energy (center), Tom Pangborn, Savoy Energy, LP (right).

MOGA Board of Directors, Bob Mannes (left), Brian Dorr (center), and Joel Myler (right).

Steve Bigard (far left), Phil Koro (left center), Mike Palmer (right center), Andy Maness (right).

Navigator Wireline and True North Directional: 20 Years of Commitment to Excellence and Community

By Amy Rostkowycz MOGA Membership & Events Coordinator

Navigator Wireline and True North Directional celebrated their 20th anniversary in 2022, marking two decades of successful operations in Roscommon County. True North is a subsidiary of Navigator Wireline. The Jock family, deeply rooted in the region, brings over 100 years of collective experience to the table, with Carl Jock, Gary Fyan, and Larry Chernik leading the way. The lifelong friends have steered the company toward excellence. Their heritage in drilling, dating back to 1864, underscores their expertise in Michigan’s oilfield.

The organization’s relentless pursuit of exceptional service spans across the Northeastern United States. Their team, comprising both seasoned veterans and new talent, excels in planning and executing various oil, gas, and storage projects with precision and dedication. However, beyond their professional endeavors, Navigator Wireline and True North Directional are driven by a strong commitment to their community.

Their business structure includes premium insurance coverage and an extremely generous 401(k) plan for all employees, ensuring their families are well cared for. Additionally, flexible scheduling supports core family values for their team of 16 full-time employees, all proud residents of

Northern Michigan.

From the outset, Carl and Sue Jock envisioned a company that not only provided financial stability but also prioritized long-term wealth and well-being.

Beyond business, Navigator Wireline and True North Directional are committed to giving back to their community. Their philanthropic efforts extend to various local causes and organizations, with over

$200,000 donated since the inception of the business. Organizations such as the American Cancer Society, Roscommon Area Booster Club, Roscommon Rotary, and Community Food Pantry, just to name a few. Navigator Wireline and True North Directional have contributed to initiatives supporting health, education, sports, and environmental conservation, reflecting their deep-rooted ties to the community they serve. Along with being members of the Michigan Oil and Gas Association, they support oil and gas associations in Ill., Ind., Ky., Ohio, Pa., Tenn., and W. Va. Navigator Wireline and True North Directional may be one of the smaller companies in the Northeast, but they are community-minded and vested.

Navigator Wireline Service and True North Directional Services continue to offer a comprehensive range of directional services throughout Michigan and the Northeastern United States. With over two decades of experience, Navigator Wireline Services remains a trusted provider in the industry, delivering wireline, MWD, EM, gyroscopic surveys, and perforation services nationwide. To learn more about True North Directional Services, visit their website at truenorthdirectional.net.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Events

(Trade Organizations)

Detailed announcements of events appear in the Out ’n About the Michigan oilpatch feature of Michigan Oil & Gas News.

MAY

(2) AAPL Field Landman Committee

Educational Seminar from 5:00 p.m. to 8 p.m. at Capital Prime Steakhouse, Lansing, Mich. Free for AAPL members + 2 CE credits. $75 for non-AAPL members. Attendance is limited. Register through AAPL website: learning.landman.org/calendar

(16) Michigan Oil & Gas Association (MOGA) Membership Dinner & Board Meeting, Courtyard Mt. Pleasant at CMU, Mt. Pleasant, Mich. Registration opens in April.

On the cover:

Captured in action: Jordan Gray from Missauke Oil and Gas Company (left) chats with Luke Miller from Miller Energy Company, LLC (right) prior to the start of the March 2024 MOGA Board Meeting & Luncheon at the Park Place in Traverse City.

Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices

Prices listed here are trading day closing prices for near-month contracts for the benchmark Light Crude Oil and Henry Hub Natural Gas traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). (Many contracts for Michigan crude oil are indexed against daily closings or monthly averages of the nearest trading month.)

Regulatory Roster

MAY

(2) Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Minerals Management Section (MMS) auction sale of oil and gas rights to state of Michigan-owned minerals (proposed), 9 a.m. Auction to be conducted online, at https://www.mineralauction.info.

� �Prices quoted here are reported by purchasers of Michigan crude oil. The prices listed do not reflect adjustments for gravity, transportation, or other considerations.

MICHIGAN OIL & GAS NEWS –  124 W. Allegan St., Ste. 1610, Lansing, MI 48933 - 1750. Phone: 517-580-5724. Email: news@michiganoilandgas.org. Michigan Oil and Gas Association website: michiganoilandgas.org.

AMANDA HATTIS

Managing Editor & Advertising Director Michigan Oil & Gas News

Reports in this edition are believed to be accurate and correct at the time of publication. Subsequent information altering important portions of reports contained herein will be addressed by clarifications or corrections in later editions.

MICHIGAN OIL & GAS NEWS, USPS 405‑780, ISSN 0746‑5769. First Class postage paid at Midland, Michigan 48642. Copyright 2024. MICHIGAN OIL & GAS NEWS is a weekly publication of Michigan Oil & Gas News, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Michigan Oil and Gas Association. General Subscription Rates (Non-Refundable): $200 a year for Weekly subscription – 50 editions, which include Monthly Report Editions; $100 a year for 12 Monthly Report Editions. Advertising rates available on request. Published weekly except last two weeks in December. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction, transmission or use in any manner without the express written permission of the publisher is strictly prohibited.

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to MICHIGAN OIL & GAS NEWS, 124 W. Allegan St., Ste. 1610, Lansing, MI 48933-1750.

Carbon capture and sequestration prioritized in Michigan

By Jason Geer MOGA President & CEO

Governor Gretchen Whitmer, alongside Democratic leaders in the Michigan House and Senate, enacted a new energy law in 2023 aimed at substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions over the next decade. A pivotal provision of the legislation, which contributed significantly to its passage, allows utility natural gas plants to continue operations under the condition that they capture and sequester carbon emissions.

Now that the law is in force, Michigan’s utilities are advocating for the state legislature to authorize a statute enabling Michigan to assume responsibility for the federal permitting program concerning carbon sequestration. This move is eagerly anticipated by utility companies and large corporations alike, as it would facilitate the utilization of carbon capture and sequestration to decarbonize critical manufacturing industries, aiding them in

achieving emissions reduction targets.

Michigan’s geological makeup lends itself favorably to carbon sequestration, underscoring the importance of state regulators overseeing the program due to their comprehensive understanding of the local geology. Moreover, the proximity of state regulators to the ground in Michigan is seen as advantageous compared to federal counterparts located in Chicago.

The federal government is currently offering numerous grants to incentivize states to assume primacy for carbon sequestration, an opportunity Michigan aims not to overlook.

A coalition effort is underway to develop and endorse enabling legislation to secure Michigan’s primacy for carbon sequestration. While there is widespread support for this initiative, environmental groups often oppose measures permitting continued fossil fuel use. Given the close ties between the current Democratic majority in Lansing and environmental

groups, it remains uncertain whether environmental groups will challenge this legislation or if lawmakers will proceed despite potential opposition. It’s noteworthy that environmental groups may inadvertently impede a law designed to accelerate emissions reduction efforts.

The oil and gas industry in Michigan stands to benefit significantly from these endeavors, as existing reservoirs offer optimal storage for greenhouse gases. Active participation and involvement from the industry in shaping carbon sequestration legislation are deemed crucial to safeguarding rights and ensuring continued utilization of enhanced oil recovery techniques. Even for businesses currently uninterested in carbon capture and sequestration, preserving the option for future benefits is emphasized.

As discussions progress, updates will be provided. For inquiries on this topic, please feel free to reach out for further clarification.

Adobe Stock photo

Politics and Policy

Legislative Spotlight: Sen. Roger Hauck

For the last 15 months, state Senator Roger Hauck has gone to work at the state Capitol each day representing residents of mid-Michigan and the Great Lakes Bay region. The 34th Senate District includes

Clare, Gladwin, Gratiot, Osceola, Mecosta and Isabella counties, and parts of Bay, Clinton, Lake, Midland, and Saginaw, too. The district is a bit bigger than the area he represented for 6 years in the state House before his move across the hall.

Hauck is one of only 5 Republican members of the powerful Senate Energy and Environment committee, and his voice carries a lot of weight. You earn a bit of respect on energy and environmental concerns when you grow up on a beef and dairy farm or own a building company. Senator Hauck checks both boxes.

It’s expertise he relies on during public policy debates and legislative negotiations.

Hauck has been an outspoken critic of the state’s latest “green energy” mandates, and a new law that strips local control of zoning decisions for wind and solar developments.

“I feel that people in this community and other communities I represent, they know what’s best for them,” he told the Gladwin County Chamber of Commerce, according to the Midland Daily News.

“The biggest issue with this plan is that it ignores the many questions and concerns that still surround a lot of the proposed alternative energy sources,” he continued in a news release.

“Taking care of the environment and continuing to study and look at alternative sources is a great cause — one that I can get behind — but we cannot abandon our current infrastructure and the investments that have already been made in pursuit of new sources that have been unproven at this scale.”

Wind and solar are often advertised as ‘free energy’ but include large upfront costs — creating a concern that the state’s ratepayers will be forced to shoulder that burden through increased rates, while also bringing into question the reliability of new sources.

The Senator shows no sign of backing down.

He is a member of the National Rifle Association, Michigan Farm Bureau, Mt. Pleasant Sacred Heart, and Eagles Club.

Battleground Michigan: The Fight Over the Future of Oil and Gas

In the high-stakes arena of presidential politics, where every dollar and endorsement counts, the oil and gas industry has once again emerged as a pivotal player. With the 2024 elections looming, U.S. industry stakeholders have thrown their weight behind a familiar face: Donald Trump. Despite record oil production under President Joe Biden, the energy sector’s wallets have spoken loudly, showering Trump’s candidacy with unprecedented financial support.

The Energy Sector’s Calculated Bet Behind the flood of donations lies a calculated bet by energy sector donors. Despite the Biden administration’s ambitious climate agenda and rhetoric on renewable energy, industry insiders remain skeptical. Trump’s track record of deregulation, support for domestic energy production, and favorable business

environment for fossil fuel enterprises resonates strongly with oil and gas stakeholders. For them, continuity in policies that prioritize their interests is paramount, making Trump’s comeback bid an attractive proposition.

The financial backing from the oil and gas industry not only bolsters Trump’s campaign coffers but also carries significant implications for policy and regulation. A potential return to the White House for Trump could herald a resurgence of regulatory rollbacks and initiatives aimed at bolstering American energy independence. This, in turn, could shape the trajectory of energy policy, environmental regulations, and the broader economic landscape.

In February, the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers launched a seven-figure ad campaign accusing

Democratic President Joe Biden of “rushing to ban new gas-powered cars, no matter where you live or what you need.” With the 2024 presidential election looming, the oil and gas industry’s decision to target battleground states like Michigan suggests a strategic calculation. The debate over the future of gas-powered cars is poised to engage voters, making it a potent issue for politicians seeking support in key swing states.

While a president’s direct impact on oil and gas production is often overstated, regulatory changes can exert influence at the margins. From environmental approvals to leasing of federal lands, a Trump administration would seek to roll back regulations perceived as hindrances to industry growth. The focus on expediting infrastructure projects and facilitating oil (continued on page 9)

Senator Roger Hauck

Battleground Michigan: The Fight Over the Future of Oil and Gas

(continued from page 8) and gas development underscores the administration’s pro-industry stance.

The Biden Administration’s Climate Agenda

One of the central themes of the 2020 U.S. presidential elections was climate change and the transition to renewable energy. President Joe Biden, upon assuming office, immediately rolled out an ambitious climate agenda aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and accelerating the shift towards clean energy sources. This agenda included rejoining the Paris Agreement, promoting electric vehicles, and incentivizing renewable energy production.

Furthermore, the Biden administration has already begun to advance regulations related to environmental protection, methane emissions, and drilling on federal lands. This now means more stringent oversight and compliance requirements for Michigan’s oil and gas industry, impacting both exploration and production activities.

Michigan’s oil and gas industry felt the effects of these policies. The Biden administration’s emphasis on reducing dependence on fossil fuels and promoting renewable energy alternatives is leading to stricter oil and gas extraction regulations. This will continue to increase compliance costs and regulatory hurdles for companies

operating in the state.

As the debate intensifies, both sides are doubling down on their positions. President Biden’s administration remains committed to its emissions-reduction goals and support for electric vehicles, while Republican opponents, including former President Donald Trump, denounce what they perceive as government overreach. With the fate of proposed regulations hanging in the balance, the outcome of the 2024 presidential election could shape the future of transportation policy in the U.S. generally, and in Michigan specifically.

What’s at Stake for Biden

Amidst geopolitical tensions, U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports have become a crucial component of global energy security. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has further accelerated demand for American gas, with developers signing numerous supply agreements. Foreign buyers, including European nations and Japan, rely on American LNG to diversify their energy sources and reduce dependence on Russian gas.

This newfound superpower status, however, is not without its challenges. Striving to appeal to climate-concerned voters while reassuring foreign allies of America’s reliability as an energy provider poses a delicate balancing act. Biden’s

administration touts its ambitious climate agenda and recent efforts to reduce methane emissions, but critics remain skeptical of its commitment to phasing out fossil fuels.

As President Biden grapples with competing demands from climate activists, industry stakeholders, and foreign allies, the future of America’s LNG industry hangs in the balance.

Conclusion

As the U.S. presidential elections approach, the Michigan oil and gas industry is at a crossroads. The outcome of the elections will determine the direction of federal energy policy and, by extension, the future of the state’s fossil fuel sector. Whether Michigan continues its reliance on traditional energy sources or embraces a transition towards renewables remains to be seen.

What is clear, however, is that the decisions made in the coming years will have far-reaching implications for the state’s economy, environment, and energy landscape. As stakeholders grapple with these challenges, the need for collaboration, innovation, and forwardthinking solutions becomes increasingly apparent.

2023 Michigan crude oil production on par with 2022; expansion of Kalamazoo, Calhoun county Trenton oil developments push Wolverine, Savoy to top of operated production list

by Scott Bellinger MOGN Contributing Writer

Solid gains in production from Ordovician Trenton oil reservoirs in southwestern Michigan’s Kalamazoo and Calhoun counties last year helped Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Michigan and Savoy Energy climb to the top of the list of operated crude oil production, with both companies reporting production of more than 560,000 barrels of crude oil in calendar year 2023.

Strong performances in the Climax, Athens 27, Burlington, and Athens fields allowed the companies to leapfrog past West Bay Exploration, the leader in operated crude oil production in Michigan from 2018 to 2022.

Wolverine’s reported production total increased by more than 200,000 barrels from 2022 to 2023, while Savoy bettered their 2022 output by more than 66,000 barrels.

Eleven companies have reported operated production of more than 100,000 barrels of crude oil in each of the past three years.

On the natural gas production side, Riverside Energy Michigan, Lambda Energy Resources, Muskegon Operating, and VCP

Michigan continued to set the pace as the top four in operated production for the third consecutive year in 2023.

Overall Michigan crude oil production was nearly flat with 2022 output in 2023,

slipping by just over 18,000 barrels to a total of 4,570,946 barrels.

Natural gas production dropped by more than 12% from 2022 to 2023, to a total of 61,101,320 Mcf.

Michigan

Crude Oil Production by Operator by Operator by Operator

Michigan Natural Gas Production by Operator by Operator by Operator

2023

Jan. – Dec.

Warning Signs: Grid Challenges and Electric Reliability Face Serious Challenges

Michigan businesses and families rely on the Midcontinent Independent System Operator – or MISO – to maintain and deploy the electric grid across the state (and the region). MISO is an independent, not-forprofit, member-based organization focused on managing the flow of high-voltage electricity across the Midwest, facilitating one of the world’s largest energy markets and its alarm sirens.

In late February, MISO published a new report, MISO’s Response to the Reliability Imperative. It isn’t all good news.

According to the system operator, urgent and coordinated action is needed to ensure continued grid reliability.

“The challenges we face are not way down the road; they are here right in front of us,” said MISO CEO John Bear in a statement to Sonal Patel, the senior associate editor at POWER . “We need to execute on the solutions that we’ve already developed with our stakeholders, and we need to collaborate more closely and collectively address these pressing issues.”

A confluence of factors, including a looming mismatch between new generation resources coming online and older resources retiring, MISO reported, have the grid facing a number of imminent and complex reliability challenges.

Many of the threats will be familiar to Michigan energy producers and news consumers. Issues like too quick a transition to unreliable wind and solar energy, and even threats from regulators to natural gas pipelines, are creating a storm on the very near horizon.

The report, available at www.MISOEnergy. org, highlights six key threats.

“Reliability attributes,” or traditional power generation facilities, are becoming more scarce. Weather-dependent resources like wind and solar simply do not provide the same critical reliability attributes as conventional coal and natural gas resources that are being retired across the region.

While too heavy a reliance on wind and solar creates its own threat, more extreme weather events have become more frequent and severe, impacting both generation and transmission.

MISO also identified serious supply chain and permitting issues that are delaying the creation of many new generation projects.

The growing use of electric vehicles is also taking a toll. Single-site assembly and recharging stations and other electrification trends are bringing large new loads onto the

grid, sucking up power that regulators worry might not always be immediately available.

MISO also pegged investor preferences in the financing of new energy projects and fuel-assurance issues with natural gas pipelines – like Line 5 here in Michigan – as serious threats to grid reliability.

In other words, Line 5 is about a lot more than propane.

MISO is urging local utilities, state governments, and others to take quick

action to address these challenges.

“MISO calls on its members and states to work together to: refine generation resource plans across MISO by accelerating the addition of reliability attributes and moderating retirement to avoid undue reliability risk; maintain transition resources as reliability “insurance” until promising new technologies become viable at grid scale; and identify areas of risk in which electricity providers, states, and MISO must coordinate.”

Many utilities and states in the MISO region have adopted policies and goals to decarbonize their resource fleets. Courtesy: MISO

MethaneSAT: A Game-Changer in the Fight Against Methane Emissions

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket recently launched MethaneSAT, a satellite designed to detect methane emissions, into orbit. Led by the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), MethaneSAT promises to revolutionize our understanding of methane leaks from the oil and gas industry worldwide.

Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, poses a significant threat to the climate due to its high heat-trapping capacity.

MethaneSAT’s targeted focus is to identify methane emissions from oil and gas operations, where leaks occur at various stages of the production process. Steven Hamburg, Chief Scientist for the EDF, underscores the importance of having precise and publicly available data on methane emissions, particularly in regions like Texas, Russia, and Nigeria.

The launch of MethaneSAT comes at a critical juncture, coinciding with regulatory efforts to curb methane emissions.

The EPA’s new rule requires oil and gas operators to monitor and mitigate methane leaks, reflecting a growing recognition of

the need for action on methane pollution. Hamburg expresses optimism that regulators will utilize MethaneSAT data to inform policy decisions and enforcement actions.

Despite industry efforts to address methane emissions, there has been a historical lack of transparency within the oil and gas sector. Antoine Halff, Chief Analyst at Kayrros, acknowledges the industry’s preference for confidentiality but highlights the potential of MethaneSAT to provide independent monitoring and promote greater accountability.

Adam Brandt, a professor at Stanford University, emphasizes the significance of MethaneSAT’s approach, which eliminates the need for permission from oil companies to access facilities for measurements.

This space-based monitoring offers a comprehensive and unbiased view of methane emissions, providing valuable insights for regulators and researchers.

While the American Petroleum Institute (API) acknowledges industry efforts

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket blasts into space. On board is a satellite with a climate solutions mission. It’s designed to detect methane, a potent planet warming gas.

Courtesy SpaceX

to reduce methane emissions, Aaron Padilla, Vice President of Corporate Policy, underscores the need for a multifaceted approach. Padilla notes the industry’s experience in utilizing satellite technology but acknowledges the value of independent monitoring initiatives like MethaneSAT.

Ultimately, Hamburg hopes that MethaneSAT’s data will incentivize oil and gas companies to prioritize methane reduction efforts, recognizing the importance of sustainability and reputation in a changing market landscape.

MethaneSAT represents a significant milestone in the fight against methane emissions, offering unprecedented insights and driving global efforts toward a more sustainable future. As governments, regulators, and industries grapple with the imperative to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, initiatives like MethaneSAT provide a ray of hope in the quest for a cleaner, healthier planet.

61768

3/19/2024

New Drilling Permit Applications

OSCEOLA Osceola, T18N, R8W ❒ Federated O&G Prop.  Smith 5-34 (F) SL: Sec 35 SW NE SW AP 20240979 (DUN-3720’) BHL: Sec 34 NW NE SE unit—NE SE 34 (BHL: 2303 S/990 W–Sec)

Permits / Issued 3/18/2024–3/22/2024

61769 5320 SAVOY ENERGY LP P.O. BOX 1560

3/22/2024 TRAVERSE CITY, MI 49685-1560

WELL NAME: M&C FARMING 1-30A

PREV PERMIT: 61757

WELL TYPE: OIL AND GAS DEPTH: 3722 FT

PERMIT TYPE: DIR REDRILL TARGET FORM: TRENTON-BLACK RIVER

FIELD NAME: UNCLASSIFIED DEEPEST FORM: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN

SURF OWNER: M&C FARMING,

SL: SE SW SE 30 4S 8W ATHENS CALHOUN 490 S/1397 E BHL: NE SW SE 30 4S 8W ATHENS CALHOUN 1276 S/1490 E 1276 S/499 W

SAME SURFACE LOCATION AS P#(S) 61757

DESC: RULE 303 SPACING EXCEPTION FOR 80-ACRE DRILLING UNIT.

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

This portion of Michigan Oil & Gas News consists of a listing of locations for which Michigan drilling permits have been applied for or issued and is arranged alphabetically by county and township, with staked, permitted and drilled holes listed within each township by section number. Locations in the same section are arranged in alphabetical order by operator and where more than one location has been staked by or permitted to the same operator the sites are listed in alphabetical order by lease name and then by lease number. Final results of drilling, deepening and/or completion work (either oil, gas dry or the completion of drilling

ALLEGAN

Overisel, T4N, R14W

❒ Consumers Energy Co.  Overisel 305 P (GS) SL: Sec 22 SW NW SE AP 20240962 (A1C-2771’) unit—Overisel GS (1603 S/2372 E–Sec)

❒ Consumers Energy Co.  Overisel 305 HD2 (GS) SL: Sec 22 SW NW SE AP 20249001 (A1C-2628’)

BHL: Sec 15 SE SE SW unit—Overisel GS (BHL: 84 S/2281 W–Sec)

❒ Consumers Energy Co.  Overisel 305 HD1 (GS) SL: Sec 22 SW NW SE AP 20240963 (A1C-2640’)

BHL: Sec 22 SW NW NW unit—Overisel GS (BHL: 695 N/393 W–Sec)

on facility wells) will appear in only one issue. The entry is then removed from the Drilling Activity section. Operator name, lease name and number of deep holes (defined by Michigan Oil & Gas News as those targeted to horizons below the top of the Glenwood Member of the Ordovician Black River Group of geologic formations in Michigan’s Central Basin) appear in bold, italic type. Tests of Cambrian-age horizons (Trempealeau Formation or deeper) in extreme southern or northern portions of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula and Upper Peninsula will also be identified with the bold type.

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Klingenberg 1-33 (F) SL: Sec 33 SE SW NE P# 61759 (TRL-1700’) unit—SW NE/NW SE (2489 N/2019 E–Sec)

ANTRIM

Custer, T29N, R7W

❒ Riverside Energy Michigan LLC  Claus D4-35 (SR) SL: Sec 35 SE SE SE AP 20240952 (TRL-1934’) unit—Custer 35 CO2 USP (627 S/565 E–Sec)

■ Riverside Energy Michigan LLC  Simpson et al B4-35 (SR) SL: Sec 35 NW SE NE P# 61707 (TRL-1720’) unit—Custer 35 CO2 USP (1666 N/694 E–Sec)

Completion Services Offering 20 Workover Rigs Full Line of Fishing and Rental Equipment Snubbing Services as well as BOPs

NOTE:

❑ Denotes tentative location, awaiting issuance of drilling permit.

■ Denotes permitted or active location.

◆ Denotes commencement of initial drilling activity since press time of previous issue of Michigan Oil & Gas News.

✓ Denotes final status report to appear on location in Drilling Activity report.

✖ Denotes both commencement of activity and final status report on location.

ARENAC

Adams, T19N, R3E

■ Jordan Dev. Co. LLC  State Adams & Clark 5-8 (W) SL: Sec 8 SW SW NW P# 61767 (DUN-3093’) BHL: Sec 7 NE SE NE unit—E NE 7/W NW 8 (BHL: 1516 N/166 E–Sec)  Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 160-acre  drilling unit.

Clayton, T20N, R4E

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Buffalo Land 5 (F) SL: Sec 10 NE NW NW DB 12866 (DUN-2650’) unit—? (330 N/990 W–Sec) We

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

ARENAC

Standish, T18N, R4E

■ Trendwell Energy Corp.  Lauzon 1-1 (F) SL: Sec 1 SW NE NE P# 61748 (DUN-2825’)

BHL: Sec 1 SW SE NE unit—E NE 1-18N-4E/NW NW 6-18N-5E  (BHL: 2195 N/944 E–Sec)

BAY Hampton, T14N, R6E

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Arms, M.A. & F. 2 (SR) SL: Sec 7 NE NW SE AP 20240932 (DUN-2882’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (2315 S/1955 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC

Arms, Maurice A. & Flora B,; County of Bay 1 (SR) SL: Sec 7 NE SW SE AP 20240936 (DUN-2888’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (991 S/1609 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC

Arms, Maurice A. & Flora B. 1 (SR) SL: Sec 7 SW SE NW AP 20240930 (DUN-2893’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (2300 N/1147 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

Michigan Field Activity in Brief

Activity in Brief–2024

(Reported

Rigs

Wells

Activity in Brief–2023

(Reported in this feature 1/6/2023–3/31/2023)

Activity in Brief–2023

(Reported in this feature 1/6/2023–12/15/2023)

Rigs in the Field ............................ 2.9 avg.

Wells Reported: OIL 23

Wells Reported: GAS 0

Wells Reported: DRY.............................. 28 Permits Terminated 11

at

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Hebert & Walther 1 (SR) SL: Sec 7 NE SE NE AP 20240911 (DUN-2892’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (1775 N/379 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Sharrad, Floyd 1 (SR) SL: Sec 7 NE SE SE AP 20240913 (DUN-2884’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (917 S/333 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  State Grandmason 1 (SR) SL: Sec 7 SW NW NE AP 20240919 (DUN-2893’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (1190 N/2219 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Stevens, Clarence E. & Heirs 1 (SR) SL: Sec 8 SW SE SW AP 20240950 (DUN-2872’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (359 S/1650 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Stevens, Clarence E. et al 1 (SR) SL: Sec 8 SW NW SW AP 20240940 (DUN-2859’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (1659 S/331 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Badour, Wm. 1 (SR) SL: Sec 15 SW SE NW AP 20240937 (DUN-2875’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (2309 N/1667 W–Sec) Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Borchardt, Geo. & Solinski, Jos. Comm. 1 (SR) SL: Sec 15 SW NW SE AP 20240938 (DUN-2870’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (1636 S/2286 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Fehrenbach, Edgar Heric 1 (SR) SL: Sec 15 SW NW NW AP 20240941 (DUN-2879’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (957 N/339 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Fritsch, Rufus 1 (SR) SL: Sec 15 SW NW SW AP 20240917 (DUN-2889’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (1648 S/443 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

Phone: 517-568-4104

Cell: 517-795-6537

Fax: 517-568-7120

E-mail: ronmcconn@gmail.com

McCONNELL & SCULLY, INC.

Rigs — Reworks, Completions, Plugging, Restoration Rod, Tubing, & Casing Services, BOPs, Support Equipment

Drilling Related Tools & Services, Roustabout Services

Water Well Drilling & Service, Full-Service Pump Shop Tank Truck Services — Transports, Vacuum Trucks 2-Class “A” SWD Wells Hot Oiling Services — Hot Oilers, Steam Equipment

Servicing Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana Office / Shop: Homer, MI SETTING THE PACE FOR OVER 57 YEARS

BAY

WEST BAY EXPLORATION Company

13685 S. West Bayshore Drive Suite 200 Traverse City, MI 49684 231-946-0200

Robert E. Tucker, Jr. President Oil & Gas Exploration & Development

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

Hampton, T14N, R6E

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Badour, Roy 1 (SR) SL: Sec 16 SW NE NE AP 20240914 (DUN-2897’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (989 N/990 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC

Oldscheeler, Eva Camminsky & Spegel, L & J 1 (SR) SL: Sec 16 SW SE NE AP 20240933 (DUN-2884’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (2301 N/991 E–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Walraven 1 (SR) SL: Sec 16 NE NE SW AP 20240915 (DUN-2887’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (2307 S/2303 W–Sec)

Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit  (Cause 15-2023).

❒ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Wiedyk, Frank 1 (SR) SL: Sec 16 NE SW SE AP 20240916 (DUN-2884’) unit—Essexville EOR (Proposed) (991 S/1652 E–Sec) Desc: Re-enter & convert existing producing well to  water injection in proposed Essexville Unit (Cause 15-2023).

CALHOUN

Athens, T4S, R8W

■ Savoy Energy LP  Palmiter Farms 2-25B HD1 (?) SL: Sec 25 NE SE NW P# 61740 (TRN-3425’)

BHL: Sec 26 SW NE SE unit—NE SE/SE NE 26/S NW/N SW 25 (BHL: 1671 S/892 W–Sec)

◆ Savoy Energy LP  Palmiter 3-27 HD2 (F) SL: Sec 27 SW SW NE AP 20230934 (TRN-3400’) BHL: Sec 34 NW NE NW unit—N NE NW 34/E SW/S SE NW/SW NE/NW SE 27 (BHL: 354 N/1657 E–Sec) to mi (planned TRN HDH rwk)  Consolidated Drilling 2, cont.

■ Savoy Energy LP  M&C Farming 1-30A (?) SL: Sec 30 SE SW SE P# 61769 (PDC-3722’)

BHL: Sec 30 NE SW SE unit—E W SE/W E SE (BHL: 1276 S/1490 E–Sec)  Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 80-acre  drilling unit.

◆ Savoy Energy LP  Harrison Family Farms 1-35 (F) SL: Sec 35 NW NE NW P# 61768 (PDC-3850’) unit—NE NW (331 N/1658 W–Sec) to mi

Consolidated Drilling 2, cont. Burlington, T4S, R7W

■ Savoy Energy LP

Motz 2-19 SWD (BD) SL: Sec 19 SW SW SW P# 61485 (CBH-2645’) unit—N/A (651 S/360 W–Sec)

■ Savoy Energy LP

Motz 3-19 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 19 NE NW SW P# 61624 (TRB-3478’)

BHL: Sec 19 SW NE SE

unit—240 ac in center of Sec 19  (BHL: 1792 S/1299 E–Sec)

■ Savoy Energy LP  Korn 5-30 HD4 (F) SL: Sec 30 NE SW SE RA 61594 (TRN-3468’)

BHL: Sec 31 NW SW NW

unit—NW/W NE 31/SW SE 30 (BHL: 1361 N/537 W–Sec) td 7240MD (HDH rwk), acid, swab dry—rerun rods,    tbng & pump test  td 1/08/2024

Leroy, T3S, R8W

■ Savoy Energy LP  Traister 1-21B (W) SL: Sec 21 NE SW NE P# 61662 (PDC-4075’)

BHL: Sec 21 SE SW NE

unit—SW NE/NW SE/W SE NE/W NW SE/E NE SW/E SE NW  (BHL: 2625 N/1637 E–Sec)

CLARE

Franklin, T20N, R3W

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Straub Unit 1-10 (SR) SL: Sec 10 SW SE NW P# 61721 (AMH-5548’) unit—Straub EOR (2295 N/1495 W–Sec)

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Straub Unit 2-10 (SR) SL: Sec 10 NE NE SW P# 61714 (AMH-5473’)

BHL: Sec 10 SW NW SE unit—Straub EOR (BHL: 1568 S/2563 W–Sec)

■ West Bay Expl.  Little 3-23 (F) SL: Sec 23 NW NW SW P# 61739 (DUN-4150’)

BHL: Sec 23 NW SW NW unit—SW NW/N SW (BHL: 1965 N/350 W–Sec)

Hamilton, T19N, R3W

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Holcomb 1-22 (SR) SL: Sec 22 NW NE NW P# 61713 (AMH-5202’) unit—? (490 N/1826 W–Sec)

Lincoln, T18N, R5W

■ ANR Pipeline Co.  Lincoln 164 HD (GS) SL: Sec 19 SE SE NW P# 61742 (SSS-1508’)

BHL: Sec 19 NE NE SE unit—Freeman-Lincoln GS (BHL: 3000 N/5150 W–Sec)

■ ANR Pipeline Co.  Lincoln 166 HD (GS) SL: Sec 19 NW SW NW P# 61744 (SSS-1507’)

BHL: Sec 24 NE NW NE (18N-6W) unit—Freeman-Lincoln GS (BHL: 180 N/1625 E–Sec)

■ ANR Pipeline Co.  Lincoln 165 HD (GS) SL: Sec 20 NE SW NE P# 61743 (SSS-1568’)

BHL: Sec 21 SW SE NW unit—Freeman-Lincoln GS (BHL: 2045 N/1435 W–Sec) Summerfield, T20N, R5W

■ Consumers Energy Co. State Summerfield C-994 HD1 (GS) SL: Sec 8 SW SE SE P# 61578 (STR-1248’)

BHL: Sec 16 SW NW SE unit—Cranberry Lake GS (BHL: 1935 S/2601 E–Sec)

■ Consumers Energy Co. State Summerfield C-994 HD2 (GS) SL: Sec 8 SW SE SE RA 61578 (STR-1251’)

BHL: Sec 17 SE NE SE unit—Cranberry Lake GS (BHL: 1424 S/10 E–Sec)

Computerized flow back and flow testing equipment and rental

• Flow Testing Equipment

• Compactor and Rental Tools

• Roustabout

• Facility Construction

• 426 CAT Backhoe

• Dozer

• Excavator

• Welding

• Steamer

• Contract Pumping

Jeff Vincent Pres. P.O. Box 1310

Cell: 231-342-9302 Kalkaska, MI 49646 jvincent@flowtekinc.com Office: 231-258-8229

• Conventional Directional

• Well Planning

• Ultra-Short & Medium Radius

• Well Interceptions

• Gyroscopic Survey

• MWD w/Gamma

• EM w/Gamma

• Wireline Steering

(989) 275-1055

P.O. Box 950 • Roscommon, MI 48653 www.truenorthdirectional.net

Northern Oil & Gas Supply

Featuring processing accessories from: Invalco Enardo Norriseal Wellmark / Cemco

Fisher Kimray Sentinel Nowata Penberthy Eclipse

Galvanized Walkway & Stairway Components

Valves

• Level Controllers

Gasket Material • Filter Elements

• Burner Parts

• Gage Valves

• Gauges

• Burner Assemblies

Large inventory of most common products

• Repair shop

P.O. Box 1310 Office: 231-258-6086 Kalkaska, MI 49646 Cell: 231-357-1713

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

GLADWIN

Gladwin, T19N, R1W

■ Trendwell Energy Corp.  Greer 1-9A (W) SL: Sec 9 SW SW SW P# 61731 (DRA-4150’)

BHL: Sec 8 SE SE SE unit—SE SE 8/SW SW 9 (BHL: 495 S/647 E–Sec)

■ Trendwell Energy Corp.  Beechy 1-16 (W) SL: Sec 16 NE NE SW P# 61686 (DUN-4050’)

BHL: Sec 16 SE SE NW unit—S NW/N SW (BHL: 2620 N/2215 W–Sec)

GRAND TRAVERSE

East Bay, T26N, R10W

❒ Savoy Energy LP  State East Bay & Schneider 1-4 HD2 (?) SL: Sec 4 SE NE SW AP 20230957 (NGN-5683’)

BHL: Sec 4 NE NE SE unit—SE (BHL: 2287 S/510 W–Sec)

Mayfield, T25N, R11W

■ Savoy Energy LP

Weber 2-6 (F) SL: Sec 6 NW NW NW P# 61562 (NGN-5975’) unit—NW NW 6-25N-11W/SW SW 31-26N-11W (199 N/544 W–Sec)

Paradise, T26N, R10W

■ Maverick Expl. & Prod.

Cunningham & State Paradise 1-27A (F) SL: Sec 27 SW NW SW P# 61247 (NGN-6580’)

BHL: Sec 27 SW NW SW unit—NW SW 27/NE SE 28 (BHL: 1956 S/280 W–Sec) td 6530MD/6524TV td 8/23/2017

INGHAM

Bunker Hill, T1N, R1E

■ Reefworks LLC  State Bunker Hill 1-3 (W) SL: Sec 10 NE NW NE P# 61708 (NGN-4184’)

BHL: Sec 3 SE SW NE unit—S NE/N SE 3 (BHL: 2937 N/1329 E–Sec)

ISABELLA

Coldwater, T16N, R6W

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Conley 1-26 (W) SL: Sec 26 SE NW NE P# 61688 (DRA-4005’) unit—NW NE (700 N/1650 E–Sec) Isabella, T15N, R4W

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Mogg 1-11 (SR) SL: Sec 11 NW NE SE P# 61751 (RCF-4835’) unit—Rosebush EOR (2313 S/994 E–Sec)

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Pappas 1-11 (SR) SL: Sec 11 NW NE NE P# 61749 (RCF-4840’) unit—Rosebush EOR (330 N/985 E–Sec)

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Pappas 3-11 (SR) SL: Sec 11 NW SW NE P# 61750 (RCF-4835’) unit—Rosebush EOR (1634 N/3320 E–Sec)

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Fitzpatrick & Collins 1-12 (SR) SL: Sec 12 NW NE NW P# 61745 (RCF-4840’) unit—Rosebush EOR (330 N/1636 W–Sec)

KEY — Drilling Activity and Rig Locations

This key is intended to aid Michigan Oil & Gas News readers in gaining full understanding and use of listings contained in our weekly Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity and Rig Location reports.

MICHIGAN OIL & GAS DRILLING ACTIVITY

Individual Entries

Line 1—Operators(s) of record, well name and well number.

Line 2—Well classification (explained in abbreviation listing at right), section number, location description, permit (PN) or permit application (AP) number, target formation and target depth. If a directional hole, surface location appears on line 2, with bottom hole location on line 2a.

Line 3—Drilling unit description and footages of surface location from quarter section or section lines (as indicated by “Qtr” or “Sec” following footage call). For directionally drilled holes, footages appear for bottom hole target only.

Line 4—Current status of holes in which drilling or deepening has been commenced or completed. (Staked locations and permitted locations for which site preparation work or drilling has not begun will not carry information in this position.) Dates listed at right margin of line indicate when well was spudded (sp), or when drilling was completed (td). If activity note and date are prefixed by “MOGN,” exact date of activity is not known, but reported status was first noted in the issue indicated. (Example: MOGN td 1/8/2021—Hole was first reported as being at total depth in January 8, 2021 edition of Michigan Oil & Gas News.)

Line 5—Drilling contractor and rig number.

GEOLOGIC HORIZON ABBREVIATIONS

(Listed from shallowest to deepest)

MAR—Marshall Sand

BER—Berea Sandstone

ANT—Antrim Shale

TRV—Traverse

SQB—Squaw Bay

TRL—Traverse Limestone

DUN—Dundee

RDC—Reed City

RCD—Reed City Dolomite

DRV—Detroit River

LUC—Lucas

DRA—Detroit River Anhydrite

MSA—Massive Anhydrite

RCF—Richfield

AMH—Amherstberg

SLF—Salina F

SLB—Salina B Salt

A1C—A-1 Carbonate

A1S—A-1 Salt

NGN—Niagaran

NGN—Niagaran Brown

NGN—Niagaran Gray

NGN—Niagaran White

CLN—Clinton

CBH—Cabot Head

CIN—Cincinnatian

CLG—Collingwood

TRN—Trenton

TRB—Trenton-Black River

BRV—Black River

NRM—New Richmond

GLN—Glenwood

PDC—Prairie du Chien

TRM—Trempealeau

RIG LOCATIONS

This report is organized alphabetically by drilling contractor name and rig number. First line includes: rig number, current operating status, quartert section of location, section, township and range and township name. Second line has county and operator name.

Common Abbreviations, Symbols and Notations

acid—acid treated

AP—permit application number

(BD)—brine disposal well

BHL—bottom hole location (directional well)

BPD—barrels (42 gallons) per day (oil)

C—center of quarter, quarter-quarter, or  quarter‑quarter‑quarter section cond—condensate cont—drilling contractor dr—drilling (plus depth if known) dry—dry hole

DST—drill stem test (followed by interval) (est)—estimated activity date or production rate (F)—field development well frac—hydraulic fracture treated (GI)—gas injection well (GS)—gas storage well gas—confirmed gas well kick—redrill directionally

MCFD—thousand cubic feet per day (gas) MD—measured depth

mir—moving in & rigging up

MMCFD—million cubic feet per day (gas) oil—confirmed oil well

perf—perforate

P#—permit number

R(A)—rework (A first, B second, etc.)

sd—shut down or stacked

SL—surface location

sp—commence drilling

td—total depth

temp abnd—temporarily abandoned

TH—“tite” hole

TV—true vertical depth (W)—wildcat or exploratory (WI)—water injection well

WTR—barrels per day of water produced ?—information unknown or unconfirmed

ISABELLA

HAROLD MARCUS LTD.

TANK TRUCK SERVICE / DUST CONTROL

• Commercial brine disposal well available

• Capable of hauling loads of brine up to 210 bbl per load 19808 M-66 N Battle Creek, MI 49017 Office: 269-969-9453 Fax: 269-969-9454

Superior Inspection Service Inc.

P.O. Box 1509 Kalkaska MI 49646

• Drill Collar Inspections

• Drill Pipe Inspections

• Hydrostatic Pressure Testing

• Casing & Tubing Inspections

• Pipe Straightening

• Pipe Descaling Service

• N.O.R.M. Inspections

• New / Used Casing & Tubing For Sale

• Tubing Work String Rental (231) 258-9400 • fax (231) 258-9716

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

Isabella, T15N, R4W

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Fitzpatrick & Prout 1-12 (SR) SL: Sec 12 NW SW NE P# 61736 (RCF-4845’) unit—Rosebush EOR (1791 N/2304 E–Sec)

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  Walton Alvin 1-12 (SR) SL: Sec 12 NW NE SW P# 61735 (RCF-4845’) unit—Rosebush EOR (2311 S/1641 W–Sec)

Sherman, T15N, R6W

■ Miller Energy Co II LLC  G. Martin 1-30 (F) SL: Sec 30 SE NE NE P# 61678 (DUN-3950’) unit—E NE (1262 N/438 E–Sec)

Vernon, T16N, R4W

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Krantz 1-5 (F) SL: Sec 5 NW NW NW P# 61766 (DRV-4163’)

BHL: Sec 5 NW NW NW unit—NW NW 5/NE NE 6 (BHL: 664 N/2539 E–Sec)  Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 80-acre  drilling unit.

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Warner 2-16 (F) SL: Sec 16 NW NW NE P# 61762 (DUN-3880’)

BHL: Sec 16 SW NE NW unit—NE NW/NW NE (BHL: 800 N/1669 W–Sec)

KALAMAZOO

Charleston, T2S, R9W

■ Savoy Energy LP  Bolhuis 2-29 SWD (BD) SL: Sec 29 SE SW SW P# 61754 (CBH-2880’) unit—N/A (575 S/1049 W–Sec)

❒ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Schug 31-6 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 31 SW SE NW AP 20230951 (TRN-3554’)

BHL: Sec 30 NE SE SW unit—SE SW 30/E NW 31 (BHL: 1660 N/1780 W–Sec)

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Clough 32-1 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 32 SE NW SW P# 61728 (TRN-3581’)

BHL: Sec 32 NE NW NW

unit—W NW/NW SW (BHL: 330 N/661 W–Sec)

td (TRN HDH)  rel 2/02/2024

Climax, T3S, R9W

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Myers 17-1 HD1

(F) SL: Sec 17 NW NW SE P# 61647 (TRN-3488’)

BHL: Sec 17 NE NE NE unit—NE (BHL: 330 N/330 E–Sec)

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Stephenson 19-1 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 19 SW SW NE P# 61673 (TRN-3390’)

BHL: Sec 19 NE NE NE unit—NE (BHL: 330 N/414 E–Sec)

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Sturm 28-2 HD1

(F) SL: Sec 28 NW NW NW P# 61763 (TRN-3433’)

BHL: Sec 21 SE NW SE

unit—W SE/E SW/SW SW 21/NW NW 28

(BHL: 1975 S/1657 W–Sec)

Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 240-acre

drilling unit.

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Peck 32-1 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 32 SE SE NE P# 61651 (TRN-3372’)

BHL: Sec 28 SE SW SW unit—SW SW 28/E NE 32/W NW 33  (BHL: 543 S/987 W–Sec)

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Stout 36-1 HD1 (?) SL: Sec 36 NE NE NW P# 61733 (TRN-3412’)

BHL: Sec 35 NW NE NE unit—NE NE 35/N NW 36 (BHL: 601 N/974 W–Sec) td (TRN HDH)  rel 12/23/2023

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  VanMiddlesworth 36-1 HD1 (?) SL: Sec 36 NW NW SE P# 61765 (TRN-3429’)

BHL: Sec 35 SE NW SE unit—N SE 35/N SW/NW SE 36 (BHL: 1835 S/1708 E–Sec)

Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 200-acre  drilling unit.

✓ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Gibson 36-1 (?) SL: Sec 36 NW NW NW AP 20240968 (PDC-3981’)

BHL: Sec 36 SW NW NW unit—N NW 36/NE NE 35 (BHL: 836 N/547 W–Sec)

Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 120-acre  drilling unit. (Proposed second well on unit.)

application withdrawn (@ request of operator)

3/25/2024

Pavilion, T3S, R10W

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Vankruiningen 14-1 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 14 SW SW SE P# 61764 (TRN-3343’)

BHL: Sec 14 NW SE SE

unit—S SE (BHL: 987 S/665 E–Sec)

Desc: Rule 303 spacing exception for 80-acre   drilling unit.

dr (planned TRN HDH)  sp 3/21/2024

Bigard & Huggard 4, cont.

■ Wolverine Gas & Oil Co. of Mich.  Weinberg 25-1 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 25 SE SE SW P# 61722 (TRN-3301’)

BHL: Sec 25 NE SW NE unit—SW NE/W SE/E SW/SE NW

(BHL: 1669 N/1675 E–Sec)

td (TRN HDH)  rel 1/12/2024

KALKASKA

Cold Springs, T28N, R6W

■ Reefworks LLC  Camp 600 1-11 (W) SL: Sec 11 SW NE NE P# 61711 (NGN-7000’) unit—N NE (819 N/770 E–Sec)

LENAWEE

Adrian, T6S, R3E

■ Savoy Energy LP  Shaffer 4-22 SWD (BD) SL: Sec 22 SW NW NW P# 61674 (CLN-2285’) unit—N/A (990 N/338 W–Sec)

LIVINGSTON

Unadilla, T1N, R3E

■ Mich. GeoSearch  Wylie 1-1A (F) SL: Sec 1 NW SE NE P# 61642 (NGN-3890’)

BHL: Sec 1 SE SW NE unit—SW NE/SE NW (BHL: 1933 N/1854 E–Sec) td 4248MD/3950TV, perf-acid, test NGN  td 12/23/2022

MANISTEE

Bear Lake, T23N, R15W

■ Lambda Energy Res. LLC  Olson 1-27 (SR) SL: Sec 27 SE NW SE P# 61756 (NGN-4870’) unit—Bear Lake 27 EOR (1860 S/1351 E–Sec)

❒ Lambda Energy Res. LLC  Meister 3-34 (SR) SL: Sec 34 SE NW NW AP 20230837 (NGN-’) unit—Bear Lake 34 EOR (880 N/871 W–Sec)

■ Lambda Energy Res. LLC  Mattison Johnnson 1-34 HD1 (SR) SL: Sec 34 NW SE NW P# 61753 (NGN-4872’)

BHL: Sec 34 SE SE NW unit—Bear Lake 34 EOR (BHL: 490 S/465 E–Qtr)

Maple Grove, T23N, R14W

■ No. Mich. Oil & Gas  Wouri 2-2 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 2 NW SE NW RA 59889 (NGN-5010’)

BHL: Sec 2 unit— (BHL: / –Sec)

MISSAUKEE

Pioneer, T24N, R7W

❒ West Bay Expl.  State Pioneer 1-2 (W) SL: Sec 2 SE SE SE AP 20240922 (AMH-4855’) unit—SE SE (660 S/330 E–Sec)

MONTCALM

Ferris, T11N, R5W

❒ W.B. Osborn Oil & Gas Ops. Ltd.  Wilson 2-22 (F) SL: Sec 23 NW NW NW AP 20220782 (TRL-3100’)

BHL: Sec 22 SE NE NE unit—NE NE 22 (BHL: 985 N/335 W–Sec)

■ W.B. Osborn Oil & Gas Ops. Ltd.  Miller 1-23 (F) SL: Sec 23 NW NW NW P# 61665 (TRL-3001’)

BHL: Sec 23 NW NE NW unit—NE NW (BHL: 660 N/1980 W–Sec)

Montcalm, T10N, R8W

■ Muskegon Operating Co. LLC  Christensen 2-11 (W) SL: Sec 11 SW NE NE P# 61672 (DRA-3450’) unit—E NE (1076 N/880 E–Sec)

NEWAYGO

Lincoln, T14N, R13W

■ Savoy Energy LP  USA Lincoln 1-4 HD1 (W) SL: Sec 4 NE NW NE P# 61634 (BBF-5810’)

BHL: Sec 4 NW NW SE unit—Sec 4 (BHL: 1995 S/2043 E–Sec)

OGEMAW

Michigan Oil & Gas Drilling Activity

West Branch, T22N, R2E

■ Savoy Energy LP  Nelson 5-36 HD1 (F) SL: Sec 36 NE SW NE P# 61611 (BOB-4076’)

BHL: Sec 36 SE NE NW unit—E NW/W NE (BHL: 957 N/2109 E–Sec)

OTSEGO

Charlton, T30N, R1W

❒ Core Energy LLC  State Charlton & Boeve 2-6A (F) SL: Sec 6 NE NW SE AP 20240967 (NGN-6036’)

BHL: Sec 6 SW SW NE unit—Charlton 6 EOR (BHL: 1619 N/2005 E–Sec) Chester, T29N, R2W

■ Lambda Energy Res. LLC  State Chester Deep 1‑15 (W) SL: Sec 15 NW NW NE P# 61652 (TRM-9300’) unit—State Chester (Deep) (475 N/2548 E–Sec) Chester, T30N, R2W

❒ Core Energy LLC  State Chester 1-27 (SR) SL: Sec 27 NE SW NE AP 20220742 (NGN-6556’) unit—NW (1039 S/1144 W–Qtr)

PRESQUE ISLE Case, T33N, R3E

■ Lambda Energy Res. LLC  Royal Rack Ranch 1-2 (W) SL: Sec 2 SE SE SW P# 61572 (NGN-3800’)

BHL: Sec 2 SE SE SW unit—SE SW 2/NE NW 11 (BHL: 369 S/2034 W–Sec)

SAGINAW

Birch Run, T10N, R6E

■ Bailer and Deshaw  Wolohan Estate B-1 SWD (BD) SL: Sec 19 SE NW SE P# 61687 (DUN-2598’) unit—N/A (755 N/920 W–Sec)

SAINT CLAIR

Casco, T4N, R15E

❒ Consumers Energy Co.

Puttygut 301 HD1 (GS) SL: Sec 11 SE SE SW AP 20220764 (NGN-2612’)

BHL: Sec 11 NE NE SW unit—Puttygut GS (BHL: 273 N/400 W–Sec)

❒ Consumers Energy Co.

Puttygut 301 HD2 (GS) SL: Sec 11 SE SE SW AP 20229009 (NGN-2612’)

BHL: Sec 11 NW NW SE unit—Puttygut GS (BHL: 2036 S/2205 E–Sec)

❒ Consumers Energy Co.

Puttygut 302 HD1 (GS) SL: Sec 11 SE SE SW AP 20220771 (NGN-2612’)

BHL: Sec 14 NW SE NW unit—Puttygut GS (BHL: 1746 N/2224 W–Sec)

❒ Consumers Energy Co.

Puttygut 302 HD2 (GS) SL: Sec 11 SE SE SW AP 20229012 (NGN-2531’)

BHL: Sec 14 NW SE NW

unit—Puttygut GS (BHL: 1695 N/1413 W–Sec)

Kimball, T6N, R16E

■ Bluewater Gas Storage LLC

Bluewater Gas Storage LLC 2-27 HD2 (GS) SL: Sec 27 NW NW SE RA 61525 (NGN-2785’)

BHL: Sec 33 NE NW NW unit—Kimball 27 GS (BHL: 385 N/1205 E–Sec)

Riley, T6N, R14E

■ Mich. GeoSearch  City of Memphis 1-35 HD1 (W) SL: Sec 35 NE SE SW P# 61644 (NGN-3404’) BHL: Sec 2 SE NE NW (5N-14E) unit—NE fr’l NW 2-5N-14E/SE SW 35-6N-14E  (BHL: 503 N/2041 W–Sec)

Saint Clair, T5N, R17E

❒ Schmude Oil Inc.

Riverside Tank & Manufacturing Corp. 1 (W) SL: PC 304 AP 20230949 (NGN-2640’) unit—Parts of PCs 304, 305 & 306

TUSCOLA

Arbela, T10N, R7E

■ Bailer and Deshaw  Harrison Murphy A-1 BDW (BD) SL: Sec 30 SW NW SW P# 61619 (DUN-2534’) unit—N/A (1650 S/990 E–Sec)

WAYNE

Romulus, T3S, R9E

■ Savoy Energy LP  Ryznar 1-20 (W) SL: Sec 20 SW NW SE P# 61649 (BRV-3500’) unit—S NW SE/N SW SE (1376 S/2274 E–Sec)

WEXFORD

Wexford, T24N, R12W

■ Federal Oil Co.  State Wexford & Borak 1-6 HD3 ST (F) SL: Sec 6 SE NE NW RD 53919 (NGN-’) BHL: Sec 31 NE SW SE (25N-12W) unit—SW SE 31-25N-12W/NW NE/E NW 6-24N-12W

(BHL: 856 S/1840 E–Sec)

Desc: Sidetrack of lost hole HDH approved as   Change of Well Status. Rule 303 spacing   exception for 160-acre drilling unit.

Rig 1 -- sd

Rig 2 -- dr (ind disp well) Washtenaw (Republic Services)

Rig 3 -- sd

Rig 4 -- dr SE 14-3S-10W, Pavilion, Kalamazoo (Wolverine G&O of Mich.)

Rig 5 -- sd CONSOLIDATED DRILLING

Rig 1 -- sd

Rig 2 -- to mi NW 35-4S-8W, Athens, Calhoun (Savoy Energy LP)

Rig 2 -- to mi NE 27-4S-8W, Athens, Calhoun (Savoy Energy LP)

STATE

OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

NOTICE OF HEARING FOR THE GAS CUSTOMERS OF DTE GAS COMPANY CASE

NO. U-21498

• DTE Gas Company requests Michigan Public Service Commission for issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Construct and Operate the 2” Daggett Pipeline in Menominee County, Michigan.

• The information below describes how a person may participate in this case.

• You may call or write DTE Gas Company, One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI 48226, 800-477-4747 for a free copy of its application. Any person may review the documents at the offices of DTE Gas Company or on the Commission’s website at: michigan.gov/mpscedockets

• A pre-hearing will be held:

DATE/TIME: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 9:30 AM

BEFORE: Administrative Law Judge Katherine E. Talbot

LOCATION: Video/Teleconferencing

PARTICIPATION: Any interested person may participate. Persons needing any assistance to participate should contact the Commission’s Executive Secretary at (517) 284-8096, or by email at mpscedockets@michigan.gov in advance of the hearing.

The Michigan Public Service Commission (Commission) will hold a pre-hearing to consider DTE Gas Company’s (DTE Gas) February 22, 2024 application requesting the Commission to: 1) determine that the Daggett Pipeline serves the public convenience and necessity and is safe for operation based on the plans, as proposed by DTE Gas; 2) grant DTE Gas a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing construction of approximately 2.1 miles of 2-inch diameter natural gas pipeline to be constructed within Daggett Township, Menominee County, Michigan, called the Daggett 31 RMS, and will run north and then west to terminate at the existing 16-inch natural gas pipeline east of US Highway 41, through private property, residential, agricultural and public roads, including an associated meter station and hot tap in Menominee County, to be designated as the “Daggett Pipeline”; and 3) grant such other relief as may be just and reasonable.

All documents filed in this case shall be submitted electronically through the Commission’s E-Dockets website at: michigan.gov/mpscedockets. Requirements and instructions for filing can be found in the User Manual on the E-Dockets help page. Documents may also be submitted, in Word or PDF format, as an attachment to an email sent to: mpscedockets@michigan.gov. If you require assistance prior to e-filing, contact Commission staff at (517) 284-8090 or by email at: mpscedockets@michigan.gov

Any person wishing to intervene and become a party to the case shall electronically file a petition to intervene with this Commission by April 9, 2024. (Interested persons may elect to file using the traditional paper format.) The proof of service shall indicate service upon DTE Gas Company’s attorney, Carlton D. Watson, One Energy Plaza, Detroit, MI 48226.

The prehearing is scheduled to be held remotely by video conference or teleconference. Persons filing a petition to intervene will be advised of the process to participate in the hearing.

Any person wishing to participate without intervention under Mich Admin Code, R 792.10413 (Rule 413), or file a public comment, may do so by filing a written statement in this docket. The written statement may be mailed or emailed and should reference Case No. U-21498. Statements may be emailed to: mpscedockets@michigan.gov. Statements may be mailed to: Executive Secretary, Michigan Public Service Commission, 7109 West Saginaw Hwy., Lansing, MI 48917. All information submitted to the Commission in this matter becomes public information, thus available on the Michigan Public Service Commission’s website, and subject to disclosure. Please do not include information you wish to remain private. For more information on how to participate in a case, you may contact the Commission at the above address or by telephone at (517) 284-8090.

Requests for adjournment must be made pursuant to Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules R 792.10422 and R 792.10432. Requests for further information on adjournment should be directed to (517) 284-8130.

For more information on how to participate in a case, you may contact the Commission at the above address or by telephone at (517) 284-8090.

Jurisdiction is pursuant to 1929 PA 9, as amended, MCL 483.101 et seq.; 1919 PA 419, as amended, MCL 460.54 et seq.; 1939 PA 3, as amended, MCL 460.1 et seq.; 1969 PA 165, as amended, MCL 483.151 et seq.; 1969 PA 306, as amended, MCL 24.201 et seq.; and Parts 1 & 4 of the Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules, Mich. Admin Code, R 792.10106 and R 792.10401 through R 792.10448.

EPA Delays Rules for Existing Gas Plants Amidst Election Season

In a strategic move that’s sparked both applause and criticism, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a delay in implementing rules aimed at curbing emissions from existing natural gas plants. This decision, which comes amidst the heat of the November election, marks a significant shift in the agency’s approach to tackling climate change and addressing environmental justice concerns.

The EPA, led by Administrator Michael Regan, revealed that while plans for regulations on coal-fired and new gas plants remain on track, rules for existing gas plants will undergo further review. This adjustment follows pressure from environmental justice groups, who argued that the initial proposal did not adequately address the disproportionate impact of toxic air pollution on marginalized communities residing near industrial sites.

Regan hailed the revised plan as a “stronger, more durable approach,” emphasizing its potential to achieve greater emissions reductions and offer better protection to frontline communities. However, the decision to delay finalizing rules for existing gas plants has drawn sharp criticism from environmental advocates who fear that this delay could impede progress on combating climate change.

Frank Sturges, representing the Clean Air Task Force, expressed deep disappointment, stressing the urgent need to control greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. Similarly, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse denounced the decision as “inexplicable,” arguing that focusing solely on coal and new gas plants is insufficient for ensuring climate safety.

Despite these objections, some

environmentalists have welcomed the EPA’s shift in strategy. Charles Harper of Evergreen Action highlighted the importance of finalizing stringent limits on climate pollution from both new gas and existing coal plants. Additionally, Abigail Dillen, president of Earthjustice, underscored the significance of addressing the proliferation of new fossil gas plants to prevent exacerbating pollution levels.

The EPA’s proposed rule, unveiled in May 2023, aimed to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing coal and gas-fired plants, as well as future gas plants. The Biden administration’s commitment to achieving a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035 underscores the gravity of these regulatory efforts.

However, the EPA’s plan faces anticipated challenges from industry groups and Republicanleaning states, who view it as governmental overreach and a threat to energy grid reliability. The National Mining Association has cautioned against premature closure of coal plants, warning of potential consequences for energy stability.

Despite differing perspectives, there’s a consensus on the urgent need to address emissions from the power sector. Peggy Shepard of WE ACT for Environmental Justice commended the EPA’s commitment to considering the concerns of marginalized communities in its rulemaking process. She emphasized the importance of developing comprehensive regulations to safeguard human and environmental health.

As the EPA navigates the complexities of regulatory decision-making, its actions will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the future of the energy landscape and efforts to combat climate change. With the November election looming, the stakes have never been higher for all stakeholders involved in shaping environmental policy.

Credit: Tamir Kalifa for The New York Times

The Environmental Protection Agency will exempt existing gas-fired plants from a regulation that would require power stations to capture their carbon dioxide emissions by 2040.

AAPL Field Landman Seminar to Take Place in Lansing, Michigan

on May 2, 2024

Lansing, Michigan - The AAPL Field Landman Committee is pleased to announce an upcoming educational seminar scheduled to take place on Thursday, May 2, 2024, from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The event will be held at the Capital Prime Steakhouse located at 2324 Showtime Drive, Lansing, Michigan.

The seminar, aimed at professionals in the field, will feature informative sessions and networking opportunities. Participants can expect engaging discussions on pertinent industry topics by esteemed speakers.

Event Details:

Date: Thursday, May 2, 2024

Time: 5:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.

Location: Capital Prime Steakhouse,    Lansing, Michigan

Address: 48912 Drive, Lansing, Michigan

Registration: Free for A-A-P-L members;   $75 for non-members

Capacity: Limited to the first 40   registrants

Agenda:

5:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.: Happy Hour and Appetizer Buffet sponsored by Meridian Energy Corporation

6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.: Educational Sessions

Drew Martin, Co-founder and Managing Partner of Miller Energy Company, discussing EPA methane tax and associated performance standards for oil and operations

Ed Rivet, Executive Director of Michigan Conservative Energy Forum, sharing insights on State of Michigan House Bill 5120 and its implications on renewable energy operations and construction in Michigan

The event will conclude with the announcement of a door prize for one lucky attendee. Participants must be present to win.

Russell Shinevar, representing the AAPL Field Landman Committee, expressed enthusiasm about the event, stating, “We sincerely hope you will join us for this event to network with industry associates, reconnect with friends, indulge in delicious food, and gain valuable knowledge applicable to fieldwork.”

For registration and inquiries, please visit the AAPL website. For further information, contact Russell Shinevar at milandman@comcast.net.

About AAPL Field Landman Committee:

The A-A-P-L Field Landman Committee is dedicated to providing educational opportunities and fostering professional development within the landman community.

In Memoriam: Glenn E. “Skip” Forcier (1936-2024)

It is with deep sadness that we announce the passing of Glenn E. “Skip” Forcier, a respected figure in the oil and gas industry. Skip, aged 88, passed away peacefully surrounded by his beloved family on March 3, 2024.

Born on January 18, 1936, in Detroit, Skip’s entrepreneurial journey began in the marine industry, where he built marinas in Detroit, Gaylord, and Lake Charlevoix. In 1974, he transitioned into the oil and gas sector, beginning with Shell Oil and then eventually founding Force Energy, a family-owned company that continues its operations today.

Skip’s legacy extends beyond his professional endeavors. Known for his generosity, adventurous spirit, and unwavering love for his family, he leaves behind a lasting impact on all who knew him.

Memorial donations in Skip’s honor may be made to Gaylord St. Mary Cathedral School (Athletic Department).

Our thoughts and prayers are with Skip’s family and loved ones during this difficult time.

3

Secretary Haaland Unveils $6 Million Initiative to Tackle Legacy Pollution in Michigan

In a notable development aimed at addressing legacy pollution and advancing environmental initiatives, Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland announced a significant investment during a roundtable discussion held in Wayne, Michigan, on Tuesday, March 26, 2024.

The announcement outlined a substantial allocation of nearly $6 million from President Biden’s Investing in America agenda, designated for Michigan to address legacy pollution by plugging orphaned oil and gas wells across the state.

The initiative, part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, signifies a substantial

investment in tackling legacy pollution. With a primary focus on orphaned wells, the Department of the Interior is set to allocate $4.7 billion specifically for this purpose.

Since the inception of the program, progress has been made, with over 7,000 wells plugged nationwide, including more than 200 in Michigan alone. This effort has reportedly led to a reduction of approximately 11,530 metric tons of potential methane emissions and contributed to job creation and economic growth.

Secretary Haaland highlighted the potential benefits of the initiative, stating,

“President Biden’s Investing in America agenda is aimed at job creation and economic revival while addressing legacy pollution sites across the nation.”

Michigan’s allocation will be utilized not only for plugging orphaned wells but also for monitoring methane emissions, assessing groundwater and surface water impacts, and prioritizing cleanup efforts near disadvantaged communities, in line with President Biden’s Justice40 Initiative.

Orphaned oil and gas wells are recognized as sources of pollution, posing environmental and health risks to communities. By addressing these wells, the administration aims to mitigate pollutants and support broader environmental goals.

To ensure effective implementation of these investments, Secretary Haaland established the Orphaned Wells Program Office last January. Additionally, states and Tribal communities have been granted funding to address orphaned wells on public and Tribal lands.

This initiative reflects the administration’s commitment to environmental conservation and economic growth. As Michigan proceeds with cleanup efforts, bolstered by federal support, communities can anticipate potential improvements in environmental quality and public health.

The Department of the Interior’s initiative represents one approach to addressing environmental challenges, aligning with its mission to manage natural resources for the benefit of the nation.

API Report Highlights American Natural Gas Strength Amid Global LNG Dominance

In a recent report released by the American Petroleum Institute (API), it has been revealed that the United States boasts some of the lowest residential natural gas prices globally, even as it maintains its position as the world leader in LNG exports. The report underscores the resilience and competitiveness of the American natural gas industry, emphasizing its ability to cater to both domestic needs and international demands.

The analysis, conducted by Energy Ventures Analysis and commissioned by API, showcases the remarkable trajectory of the U.S. natural gas sector over the past decade. Key findings indicate:

Decline in Natural Gas Prices: Over the last decade, average natural gas prices at the Henry Hub, a key benchmark, have plummeted by 54%. This remarkable decline is attributed to the shale revolution, which has transformed the U.S. into a global energy powerhouse.

Record-Low Prices: Despite soaring levels of natural gas exports, U.S. prices have remained impressively low. In the first half of 2023, prices averaged just $2.48 per MMBtu at Henry Hub, marking the lowest six-month average in over 35 years.

Balanced Supply and Demand: The surge in natural gas production, which has outpaced the growth in LNG exports, has ensured a well-supplied market for U.S. consumers. Since 2016, production has increased by 31 Bcf/d, significantly outstripping the rise in LNG exports.

API Senior Vice President of Policy, Economics and Regulatory Affairs, Dustin Meyer, emphasized the significance of these findings, particularly in light of policy debates surrounding energy affordability and security. He criticized what he termed the “misguided LNG freeze” proposed by the administration, warning of its potential impact on American jobs and global energy stability.

Meyer urged policymakers to prioritize smart policies that facilitate increased

Adobe Stock photo

natural gas production and infrastructure development, underscoring the crucial role of the industry in supporting economic growth and energy security.

The report also addresses concerns about the impact of LNG exports on domestic supply and prices. Contrary to fears of shortages, the analysis suggests that the lengthy development process for export terminals allows producers ample time to ramp up production, thus ensuring continued affordability for U.S. consumers.

Furthermore, the report highlights the

environmental benefits of U.S. LNG exports, noting that the transition from higheremitting fuels to natural gas has played a pivotal role in reducing CO2 emissions. It positions U.S. LNG as a catalyst for global climate action, supporting economic development and job creation across the country.

As the U.S. natural gas industry continues to evolve, API remains committed to advancing environmental and safety standards through initiatives such as API Energy Excellence®. With

approximately 600 members representing various segments of the energy sector, API continues to advocate for policies that promote innovation, sustainability, and economic prosperity.

For further details on the report and API’s initiatives, including access to fact sheets and executive summaries, visit API.org.

The API report underscores the resilience and competitiveness of the American natural gas industry, emphasizing its ability to cater to both domestic needs and international demands.

Oil and Gas Industry Faces Regulatory Storm: IPAA Meeting Recap

In a virtual assembly convened by the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA), industry stalwarts and representatives from the IPAA and roughly 30 members of the Michigan Oil and Gas Association (MOGA) gathered to dissect looming regulatory changes. Spearheaded by Jeff Eshelman, president and CEO of IPAA, alongside Ryan Ullman, Vice President of Government Relations & Political Affairs, Lee Fuller Officer –Environment and General Strategy, and Jim Elliott, the meeting tackled critical updates and strategies for navigating the evolving regulatory landscape.

The session kicked off with Eshelman providing a concise overview of IPAA’s ongoing initiatives, setting the stage for the substantive discussion—Lee Fuller’s legislative update. Fuller’s thorough briefing delved into the intricacies of impending regulatory shifts, with a particular focus on methane emissions regulations spearheaded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Fuller highlighted two significant regulatory initiatives that have sent ripples of concern through the oil and gas sector. The first, the OOOOb and OOOOc regulatory package, represents a culmination of

efforts dating back to 2012, aimed at curbing methane emissions across various facets of oil and gas production. Fuller elucidated on the complex nature of this regulatory package, emphasizing its potential impact on industry operations.

Equally daunting is the methane emissions reduction program, still in the proposal stage but poised to impose methane-based taxes alongside stringent regulatory measures. Fuller underscored the far-reaching implications of this program, particularly for MOGA members, as they brace for potential economic ramifications.

Detailed insights into the regulatory program revealed a labyrinth of challenges, including leak detection and repair protocols, regulation of pneumatic controllers, and management of associated gas from crude oil production. Of particular concern were the potential economic burdens on small well operators, with estimates suggesting a substantial portion of existing wells could face closure.

In response to these regulatory shifts, Fuller outlined IPAA’s proactive stance, exploring potential legal avenues such as litigation and petitions for reconsideration. Collaboration with state agencies was also

emphasized as part of efforts to influence regulatory frameworks conducive to industry sustainability.

Following Fuller’s comprehensive update, Jim Elliot shed light on Michigan’s proactive engagement within a broader coalition of state associations, dating back to 2012.

Elliot stressed the importance of unity and cooperation in navigating regulatory challenges, outlining potential strategies for challenging regulatory measures.

The meeting concluded with Ryan Ullman discussing upcoming timelines, strategies for legal challenges, and the imperative of substantiating arguments with credible facts and public documents to engage effectively with regulatory bodies.

As the oil and gas industry braces for regulatory storms, stakeholders remain vigilant, navigating challenges while advocating for a balanced approach that ensures environmental stewardship without stifling industry innovation and viability. The coming months promise to be pivotal as industry leaders and regulatory bodies continue to grapple with the complexities of energy policy and environmental conservation.

Adobe Stock photo