GSU EMPLOYER SURVEY with alignments

GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY EMPLOYER QUESTIONNAIRE

The College of Education is continually seeking ways to update and improve the quality of Grambling’s educational programs by evaluating our graduates as they teach/or provide leadership/mentoring in your school.

Employers are offered an opportunity to assist the College of Education in preparing quality graduates by completing this questionnaire designed to provide feedback in critical areas of teacher training and educational leadership. ALL responses provided will be held confidential, but used for program improvement. We want to stress that you are only helping the College of Education to assess its educational programs NOT your employee.

• Complete the survey and fax to 318-274-7373 or email to monroemr@gram.edu.

• Questions about the survey? Call (318) 274-3702 or email to monroemr@gram.edu.

• Your responses will be kept strictly confidential. Data from the study will be used for planning and research; individuals will not be identified in any analysis or report. Please answer as many items as you can.

Thank you for your time and assistance.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PERSON COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE:

1. How many years have you served as an administrator? years.

2. How long have you supervised the Grambling graduate for whom you are completing this questionnaire?

Part I Please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following statements about the Grambling State University graduate under your supervision by check the box that best represents your response.

1 Very Dissatisfied

2 Dissatisfied

3 Satisfied

4 Very Satisfied

1. Knowledge of subject area (content)

InTASC standard 4, CEC 3; ILA 1; NCTM 1, NCSS 1; LA COMP A, B; PETE 1; CAEP Elem. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2e

2. Instructional and pedagogical content knowledge InTASC standards 5, 6, 7, 8; CEC 3; ILA 2 ; NCTM 2 ; PETE 1, 3, NCSS 3; LA COMP A, B; CAEP Elem. 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e

3. Teaching diverse P-12 students InTASC standards 1, 2; CEC 1, 5; ILA 4; NCTM 6, 3 ; PETE 3, 4, NCSS 4; LA COMP A,D,E,F,G,H; CAEP Elem. 1b, 3d, 4e, 4f, 4g

4. Alignment of teaching with state standards InTASC standard 5; CEC 3; ILA 2; NCTM 3 ; PETE 3, 4; NCSS 3; LA COMP A, H; CAEP Elem. 2,3,4

5. Teaching P-12 students with diverse learning needs InTASC standard 2; CEC 1, 5; ILA 4; NCTM 6, 3; PETE 3, 4; NCSS 4; LA COMP A,D,E,F,G,H; CAEP Elem. 1b, 3d, 4g

6. Collaboration with school-based colleagues and staff InTASC standard 9, 10; CEC 7; ILA 6; NCTM 3, 6 ; PETE 3, 4, 5, 6; NCSS 5; LA COMP A, C1-3, E, G; CAEP Elem.5a, 5b, 5c

7. Family and community engagement. InTASC standard 10; CEC 7; NCTM 6 ; PETE 6; LA COMP A, E, G; CAEP Elem. 1c

8. Development of a safe learning environment. InTASC standard 3; CEC 2; NCTM 6 ; PETE 3, 4; NCSS 4; LA COMP A, D, F, G; CAEP Elem. 3e, 3f, 4f, 4g

9. An ability to utilize technology in the instructional process. InTASC standards 7, 8; CEC 5; ILA 5; NCTM 3; PETE 3, 4, 6; CAEP Elem. 5c

10.Assessment of P-12 student learning. InTASC standard 6; CEC 4; ILA 3; PETE 5; NCSS 3; LA COMP A, C 1-3, H; NCTM 5; 3a, 3b, 3c,; CAEP Elem. 3a, 3b

1 Very Dissatisfied 2 Dissatisfied 3 Satisfied 4 Very Satisfied

11. Participating in professional development and professional learning communities. InTASC standard 9; NCTM 3 ; PETE 6; NCSS 5; LA COMP A, C1-3, E, G (Duplication below?); CAEP Elem. 5a, 5b, 5c

Part II Overall Evaluation

What is your overall rating of the performance of the Grambling State University graduate?

Given the opportunity, would you hire another Grambling State University graduate? Yes No

Part III: examining the knowledge, skills and dispositions of graduates

Please identify the strengths of the Grambling State University graduate.

Please identify the areas for improvement of the Grambling State University Teacher Preparation Programs.

Additional comments regarding the Grambling State University graduate(s). THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ASSISTANCE.

1 Very Dissatisfied 2 Dissatisfied 3 Satisfied 4 Very Satisfied

Needs Improvem ent Fair Good Very Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

Alignment Matrix of National, Professional, and EPP Standards

This demonstrates our conceptual framework’s alignment with state and national standards

InTASC GSU CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK CAEP LA COMP ISTE NCSS NSTA SECEDScience NSTA 2020 NCTM SECEDMath SHAPE KINESPedagogy NAEYC PK3 Early LitPedago gy CEC* (2020) ELED M/M MAT MSEdSpED CAEP K6 ELED ILA MSEdReading 1 Learner Development 2.1 3.3 1.1-3 3.1 3.3 3.4 A D F G 1c 5c 4 NSTA 2012 2.0 1 1a 2.a-2.b 1a; 1b 4a 2.1 2.2 1.a 5.1-5.3 2 Learning Differences 1.3 4.1-4 5.1-5 A D E F G H 5a 4 NSTA 2012 2.0 NSTA 2012 5.0 2 1a 3.b-3.d 2.a-2.b 2a 1.2 2.2 1.b 4.1, 4.3 3 Learning Environments 1.3 1.1-5 3.3 3.4 A D F G 3b 6a 4 NSTA 2012 3.0 3 4 4a-e 3.c 4.c-4.d 1c 6.1 6.2 6.3 1.b 3.e 5.1-5.2 4 Content Knowledge 1.1 1.1-5 2.3 3.1-6 A B 1a; 1c 1 NSTA 2012 1.0 1 1.a-1.f 5a 3.1 2.a-2.d 1.1-1.3 5 Application of Content 1.2 1.1-5 3.1-6 4.1-4 5.1-5 A B 3a 5b; 5c 6c 2 3 NSTA 2012 1.0 2 2a-f 1.a-1.f 2.a-2.b 5b 7a-b 3.2 2.a-2.d 2.1-2.3 6 Assessment 2.3 1.2-5 4.1-4 5.1-5 A C1-3 H 7a-c 3 NSTA 2012 5.0 5 5a-c 2.a-2.b 3.a-3.f 5.a-5.c 3a-d 4.14.3 3.a 3.b 3.1-3.4 7 Planning for Instruction 2.1 1.1-5 2.1-5 3.1-6 4.1-4 5.1-5 A H 3a 4a 5b; 5c 6c 7b 2 3 NSTA 2012 2.0 2 3 4 3.a-3.f 3.a-3.f 4.a-4.e 3a 5b 3.2 5.1 5.5 5.6 7.2 3.c 3.d 3.f 1.1 2.1 3.3 8 Instructional Strategies 2.2 2.3 1.1-5 3.1-6 4.1-4 5.1-5 A B 3a 4a-c 5b; 5c 6b; 6c 4 3 NSTA 2012 2.0 2 3 4 3a 3.a-3.f 4.a-4.e 3a 4c 3.2 5.25.6 6.3 4.a- 4.g 2.2-2.3 4.2 9 Professional Learning and Ethical Practice 3.1 3.2 2.1-3 4.1-4 5.1-5 A C1-3 E G 1a-c 3c; 3d 6d 5 NSTA 2012 4.0 NSTA 2012 6.0 6 2b; 2c 6c 3.c 4.c-4.d 5.c 6.a-6.c 4d 6b-d 1.1 1.3 5.b 5.c 6.1-6.3 10 Leadership and Collaboration 3.2 3.3 2.1-3 4.1-4 5.1-5 A E G 2a-c 3a; 3d 4a-d 6d 5 NSTA 2012 6.0 6 2b; 2c 6a-b 5.a-5.c 6.a-6.c 6a; 6e 1.2 7.17.4 1.c 5.a 3.4 4.3 4.4 6.4 7.2

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook