Michael Chan Chak Fung Architecture Portfolio

Domain Entrance

RF

+7.8m Roof Garden

2F

Michael CHAN CHAK FUNG | PORTFOLIO

+5.2m Exhibition Area Cafe Museum Store Balcony Architect workshop Lecture Room Info & Access Control

1F

Underground Walkway Entrance

+2.6m Exhibition Area Meeting Room Storage Exhibition Workshop

GF

+0.0m

Exhibition Area Restaurant Library Office Storage Carpark Info & Access Control

Sir John Young Cres Entrance

MICHAEL CHAN CHAK FUNG N1606, 33 Ultimo Road, Haymarket, 2000 Sydney, NSW Australia michaelchancf@me.com +61 0466 399 088

EDUCATION Univerity of Sydney | Australia 2018 - 2020 2013 - 2016

Master in Architecture Bachelor of Design in Architecture

Raimondi College | Hong Kong 2006 - 2012

Secondary School

EXPERIENCE 2018

SnagR Ltd. |

Australia and Hong Kong

Intern 2016

Architecture Design and Research Group Ltd. | Hong Kong Year Out Experience

2014

Hong Kong Student Association of University of Sydney | Australia Committee Member

2011

Prefect Body of Raimondi College | Hong Kong Deputy Head Prefect

ACHIEVEMENT 2018

The “Street - Corner Urbanism” Conceptual Design Competition | Australia Honourable Mention

PROFICIENCY AutoCAD, Revit, ArchiCAD, Rhino, Grasshopper, Adobe Suite(Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign), Microsoft Office (Words, Powerpoint, Excel), PowerBI

LANGUAGE Cantonese, English, Mandarin

ARCHITECTURE | PORTFOLIO

UNIVERSITY WORKS Master of Architecture

Master of Architecture

Master of Architecture

Master of Architecture

Master of Architecture

Bachelor of Design in Architecture

01 02 03 04 05

1031 BOURKE STREET Urban Studio

69 CARLTON CRESCENT

Sustainability Studio

EDEN’S ARM

3D Modelling Elective

AGORA

Graduation Studio

SOCIO AUTOMATA

Digital Studio

06

CAVE

07

HKU LECTURE THEATRE

Graduation Studio

PROFESSIONAL WORKS AD+RG

1031 BOURKE STREET URBAN STUDIO MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE 2018

OVERVIEW Green Square is undergoing urban renewal as population is growing at a rapid rate. Australian planning policies is switched to focus on increasing urban density to cope with the growth.

The brief encourages us to look at the site on an urban scale and propose a fitting program.

We look at the property and rental value of Green Square, and analyse its effect on demographic change. We conclude that Green Square is going through gentrification that promotes discrimination towards certain groups of people.

WE PROPOSE TO PROVIDE AFFORDABLE SOCIAL HOUSING FOR 6 TARGET GROUPS THAT ARE AFFECTED

BY GENTRIFICATION.

01

THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT HAS CHANGED THEIR DIRECTION AND

15k

DECIDED TO PROVIDE HOUSING THROUGH INCREASING DENSITY. THE URBAN RENEWAL OF GREEN SQUARE AIMS TO INCREASE DENSITY BY

30k

40k

50k

60k

DENSITY: 21126 persons/sq.km HK DENSITY: 6690 persons/sq.km

PROVIDING MORE INFRASTRUCTURE AS WELL AS FACILITIES TO ATTRACT

POPULATION

R E S E A R C H

SYDNEY HOUSING VALUE

GREEN SQUARE POPULATION ESTIMATE

AFTER YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT BY BUILDING ON UNDEVELOPED LANDS,

PEOPLE TO LIVE IN GREEN SQUARE. HOWEVER, FROM THE STATISTICS IT IS OBSERVED THAT UNDER THE URBANISATION, THERE IS ALSO GENTRIFICATION OF THE POPULATION. THE POPULATION PROFILE IS SHIFTING TOWARDS A YOUNGER POPULATION

WITH OCCUPATION THAT IS MAINLY PROFESSIONALS. THE PROCESS OF

HIGH

GENTRIFICATION HARMS DIVERSITY AS WELL AS THE COMMUNITY IN

MEDIUM

GENERAL AS A SINGLE DEMOGRAPHIC DOMINATES THE AREA.

RELATIVELY LOW

2011

2016

2021

2026

2031 SYDNEY RENTAL AFORDABILITY

GREEN SQUARE AGE STRUCTURE BABIES AND PRESCHOOLER (0-4) PRIMARY SCHOOLER (5-11) SCDONDARY SCHOOLER (12-17) TERTIARY EDUCATION (18-24) YOUNG WORKFORCE (25-34)

PARTENTS AND HOMEBUILDER (35-49)

OLDER WORKERS (50-59) EMPTY NESTERS AND RETIREES (60-69)

EXTREMELY UNAFFORDABLE SEVERELY UNAFFORDABLE MODERATELY UNAFFORDABLE

SENIORS (70-84) ELDERLY (85+) 0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PEOPLE (2016)

-4%

-3%

-2%

-1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

PERCENTAGE CHANGE OF PEOPLE (2011-2016)

RENTAL AFFORDABILITY INDEX

GREEN SQUARE OCCUPATION DISTRIBUTION MANAGERS

RAI =

PROFESSIONALS

30% OF INCOME MEDIAN RENT PRICE

X 100

TECHNICIANS AND TRADES WORKERS PERSONAL SERVICE WORKERS CLERICAL AND ADMIN WORKERS

INDEX SCORE

% INCOME ON RENT

RELATIVE AFFORDABILITY

<50

60% or more

Extremely unaffordable rents

MACHINERY OPERATORS AND DRIVERS

50-80

38-60%

Severely unaffordable rents

LABOROURERS

80-100

30-38%

Unaffordable rents

100-120

25-30%

Moderately unaffordable rents

120-150

20-25%

Acceptable rents

>150

15% or less

Affordable rents

SALES WORKERS

0%

10%

20%

30%

PERCENTAGE OF EMPLOYED PERSON (AGED 15+)

40%

0

+500

+1000

+1500

+2000

CHANGE IN NUMBER OF EMPLOYED PEOPLE

+2500

WOMEN R EFU GE | SINGLE PARE NT ON BENEFIT

K E Y WORK E R F A MI L Y

ELDERLY ON PENSION

RAI FOR WOMEN REFUGE/SINGLE PARENT

RAI FOR KEYWORKER FAMILY

RAI FOR ELDERLY ON PENSION

EXTREMELY UNAFFORDABLE SEVERELY UNAFFORDABLE MODERATELY UNAFFORDABLE

EXTREMELY UNAFFORDABLE SEVERELY UNAFFORDABLE MODERATELY UNAFFORDABLE

EXTREMELY UNAFFORDABLE SEVERELY UNAFFORDABLE MODERATELY UNAFFORDABLE

RAI SCORE: 42

RAI SCORE: 100

RAI SCORE: 31(SINGLE)/51(COUPLE)

PERCENTAGE INCOME ON RENT: 71%

PERCENTAGE INCOME ON RENT: 30%

PERCENTAGE INCOME ON RENT: 97%/59%

SINGLES ON BE NEFIT

HOME L E SS

RAI FOR SINGLES ON BENEFIT

SYDNEY HOMELESSNESS INTENSITY SKILL LEARNING

PERCENTAGE INCOME ON RENT: 150%

EXTREMELY UNAFFORDABLE SEVERELY UNAFFORDABLE MODERATELY UNAFFORDABLE

RAI SCORE: 20

HIGH MEDIUM LOW

CHILDCARE

COMMUNITY SERVICES

HEALTHCARE

USER/PROGRAM RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM

T A R G E T

G R O U P

THIS PROCESS OF GENTRIFICATION CAN BE FURTHER EXPLAINED BY LOOKING AT HOUSING VALUE. THE ADDITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES, JOB OPPORTUNITIES, AND VARIOUS FACTORS INCREASE THE DEMAND OF HOUSING IN THE AREA AND THEREFORE INCREASE THE HOUSING/RENTAL PRICE. RESIDENTS THAT ORIGINALLY LIVE IN THE AREA CAN NOT AFFORD FOR HOUSING WILL BE FORCED TO LIVE IN OTHER PLACES. THEY WILL BE REPLACED

BY RESIDENTS THAT CAN AFFORD THE HOUSING, IN GREEN SQUAREâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S CASE WILL BE YOUNG PROFESSIONALS. THE PROCESS OF GENTRIFICATION IS HARMFUL TO THE COMMUNITY AS IT LOWERS THE DIVERSITY IN TERMS OF AGE GROUP AND INCOME GROUP. THE AREA WILL BECOME BLAND WITH A SINGLE DEMOGRAPHIC AND RESIDENTS THAT LIVED THERE FOR THEIR WHOLE LIFE ARE FORCED TO LEAVE. IT IS SOCIALLY UNHEALTHY AND UNSUSTAINABLE. FROM A PRAGMATIC VIEWPOINT, LOW INCOME/KEY WORKERS THAT ARE PUSHED OUT MIGHT FIND IT DIFFICULT TO TRAVEL FOR WORK, AND THEREFORE LOOK FOR JOB NEAR THEM INSTEAD. THE GENTRIFIED AREA WILL HAVE DIFFICULTY FINDING SUITABLE WORKERS AS MOST OF THE POPULATION ARE PROFESSIONALS. FROM A PRAGMATIC AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY VIEWPOINT, IT IS ESSENTIAL TO MAINTAIN DIVERSITY SO AS TO HAVE A SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY AND LET PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT DEMOGRAPHICS ENJOY THE RESULT OF ECONOMIC GROWTH.

THERE ARE 6 GROUPS THAT ARE IDENTIFIED BASED ON RAI (RENTAL AFFORDABILITY INDEX) THAT ARE UNDER THE MOST HOUSING STRESS AND MOST DESPARATE FOR ASSISTANCE.

U S E R / P R O G R A M R E L A T I O N S H I P HAVING EXAMINED DIFFERENT GROUPS AND UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR NEEDS ARE. A MATRIX OF PROGRAMS ARE LISTED UNDER EACH GROUP AND CROSS-MATCHED. THE GROUPS AND PROGRAMS ARE ORGANIZED IN TERMS OF HOW GROUPS CAN SHARE PROGRAMS AND IN TERMS OF PRIVACY OF THE PROGRAMS. AS A RESULT, GROUPS ARE ORGANIZED REVOLVING THE CHILDCARE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES, THE HIERARCHY BRACHED OFF AS THE NATURE OF PROGRAMS BECOME MORE PRIVATE.

| LOS ANGELESLOS ANGELES |

BALCONY BEDROOM

24

24

.5m

.5m

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

LIVING/ KITCHEN BALCONY

LIVING/ KITCHEN BALCONY

BALCONY 4m BALCONY BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING/KITCHEN LIVING/KITCHEN ACCESS CORRIDOR ACCESS CORRIDOR BEDROOM BALCONY

ELEVATOR

ELEVATOR

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 8

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 5

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 2

C A S E

BALCONY BEDROOM

S T U D Y

| FRANCE | FRANCE

4m

BEDROOM BALCONY

ROOF GARDEN

ROOF GARDEN

INBETWEEN PROGRAM INTERLOCK UNIT

INTERLOCK UNIT

ACCESS CORRIDOR

ACCESS CORRIDOR

ELEVATED GROUND

1. OPEN THEATRE 2. GYM 3. RUNNING TRACK 4. CAFE 5. POOL 6. CHILDREN PLAY AREA

ROOF PLAN

ROOF PLAN

ROOF TERRACE

PRIVATE RESIDENT

INBETWEEN PROGRAM

MODULAR UNIT

MODULAR UNIT

ROOFTOP TERRACE

ROOFTOP TERRACE

STRUCTURE

STRUCTURE

ROOF TERRACE

PRIVATE RESIDENT

ELEVATED GROUND

SEMI PUBLIC 1F

1. OPEN THEATRE 2. GYM 3. RUNNING TRACK 4. CAFE 5. POOL 6. CHILDREN PLAY AREA

EXERCISE ROOM

SEMI COMMUNITY PUBLIC ROOM 1F

EXERCISE ROOM COMMUNITY ROOM

LIFT LOBBY

LIFT LOBBY

ART ROOM

ART ROOM

RUNNING TRACK

RUNNING TRACK

PATIO

PATIO

COMMUNAL GARDEN

COMMUNAL GARDEN

COMMUNAL KITCHEN

COMMUNAL KITCHEN

PUBLIC GF

RETAIL/ HEALTH CENTRE

PUBLIC GF

RETAIL/ HEALTH CENTRE

MASSING

DIAGRAM

UNSW

BOTNAY BAY GREEN SQUARE

P L A N S

SYDNEY HARBOUR

G E N E R A L

CITY NORTH

HERITAGE BUILDING

WATERLOO SOCIAL HOUSING ESTATE

CITYWEST HOUSING OWNED AFFORDABLE HOUSING WATERLOO SOCIAL HOUSING ESTATE GREEN SQUARE URBAN RENEWAL AREA

GF PLAN 1:1000

TYPICAL PLAN 1:2000

ROOF PLAN 1:2000

1F PLAN 1:1000

UNIT TYPE

WEST ELEVATION 1:1000

SECTION A-A 1:1000

ABOVE

SECTION B-B 1:1000

UNIT 2A AND 2B ARE FOR ELDERLY. THEY DO NOT FOLLOW TYPE 1 AS IT IS UNSAFE FOR ELDERLY TO USE STAIRS. 2A IS FOR COUPLE ELDERLY AND 2B IS FOR SINGLE ELDERLY.

BELOW TYPE 3 IS FOR SINGLES, IT IS ACCESSED THROUGH A SINGLE LOADED CORRIDOR AND CONTAINS DINING, KITCHEN, BEDROOM AND BATHROOM. TYPE 4 IS FOR HOMELESS PEOPLE, AS THERE IS SHARED KITCHEN AND BATHROOM IN THE BLOCK, THE UNIT ONLY CONTAINS BEDROOM, TOILET AND LIVING SPACE. IT IS ACCESSED BY A DOUBLE LOADED CORRIDOR AS IT PROVIDES ENCLOSED SPACE FOR PEOPLE TO TRAVEL TO SHARED BATHROOM AND ALSO HELPS TO INCREASE UNIT NUMBERS. ON THE LEFT TYPE 1A IS A UNIT TYPE FOR FAMILY, IT IS INSPIRED BY THE INTERLOCK UNITS FROM UNIT Dâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;HABITATION, HOWEVER ONLY ONE SIDE OF THE INTERLOCK UNITS IS USED SINCE THERE IS AN INTENT TO USE SINGLE LOADED CORRIDOR AND LIMIT THE WIDTH OF THE BUILDING. THE LOWER FLOOR IS KITCHEN, DINING AND LIVING ROOM AND UPPER FLOOR IS BEDROOM AND BATHROOM. TYPE 1B IS FOR SINGLE WOMEN REFUGE, HOWEVER AS ACCESS CORRIDOR IS LOCATED ON EVERY TWO FLOORS, A STAIR IS USED TO ACCESS THE UPPER UNIT.

69 CARLTON CRESCENT SUSTAINABILITY STUDIO MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE 2018 OVERVIEW Designs for elderly are often discriminative and ignore emotional needs. E.g. social housing for young families usually have space for entertainment and gathering while elderies design would not.

02

S I T E

The project dives deep into the issues elderlies face and proposes architectural solutions that allow them to age-in place without being discriminated.

A N A L Y S I S

The brief of the project is to take a site at Summer Hill railway station, and imagine a community that allows residents and neighbours to age-in place.

R E S E A R C H

THERE ARE MANY REASONS THAT ELDERLIES LOSES THEIR MOBILITY.

SUMMER HILL HAS A MAJORITY OF RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AND THE INFLUX OF FAMILY AND SENIOR RESIDENTS HAS BEEN INCREASING FROM 2011 TO 2016. THE AREA WILL RECEIVE MORE AGING POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. AS PEOPLE ARE MORE USED TO CITY LIFE, THE DEMAND FOR AGE IN PLACE HOUSING WILL INCREASE AND FACILITIES THAT AID SUCH IDEA WILL NEED TO BE IMPLEMENTED.

THE MOST OBVIOUS ONE IS FUNCTIONAL DEGRADATION, AS WE GROW OLD, OUR BODY DECAY AND WE GRADUALLY LOSES MOBILITY. OTHER REASONS SUCH AS ILLNESS THAT CAUSES ELDERLIES BE BED RIDDEN, OR DEMENTIA THAT CAUSES ELDERLIES UNABLE TO CONTROL THEIR BODY.

THE FURTHER AWAY FROM THE CITY CENTRE, THE LESS DENSE THE HOUSING. THE CHANCE OF ELDERLY LIVING ALONE WILL INCREASE, THEREFORE SERVICES THAT HELP THESE ELDERLIES LIVING IN ISOLATION IS NEEDED.

THE PROBLEM WITH LOSING MOBILITY IS THAT ELDERLIES LOSE THE ABILITY TO TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES, ON A BASIC LEVEL THEY NEED ASSISTANCE TO DO DAILY CHORES, WHICH MAKES IT DANGEROUS IF THEY ARE NEGLECTED. ON PSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL ELDERLY THAT SUFFER LOSE OF MOBILITY WOULD FEEL A SENSE OF WORTHNESSLESS AS THEY FEEL LIKE THEY ARE A BURDEN TO OTHERS.

C A S E

S T U D Y

THE OTHER PROBLEM ELDERLIES FACE IS LONELINESS.

Slip House | BRIXTON | Carl Turner Architects THE SLIP HOUSE BY CARL TURNER ARCHITECTS IS SIMILAR TO OUR PROJECT, IT IS SITUATED IN A MEDIUM DENSITY SUBURB, THE IDEA OF THE HOUSE IS TO INCORPORATE WORKSHOP SPACE AND PROVIDE FLEXIBLE UNIT ARRANGEMENT. THE HOUSE CAN BE SPLIT IN TO STUDIO, APARTMENTS AND AS A SINGLE HOUSE.

THERE ARE ALSO MANY REASONS FOR THIS TOO. THE LOSE OF A SPOUSE BAD FINANCIAL SITUATION THAT MAKES ELDERLY TO RATHER STAY HOME THAN GOING OUT LOSE OF MOBILITY THAT CAUSES THEM UNABLE TO GO OUT SOMETIMES A BAD BODY IMAGE CAN ALSO CAUSE THEM UNWILLING TO GO OUT AS WELL. THE PROBLEM OF MOBILITY AND LONELINESS IS CONNECTED TO THEIR SELF WORTH, WHILE THEIR EVALUATION OF THEIR SELF WORTH ALSO AFFECT HOW THEY FACE THESE PROBLEMS. ELDERLIES ARE JUST NORMAL PEOPLE, BUT WITH SPECIFIC PROBLEMS AT THIS STAGE OF LIFE JUST LIKE ALL OTHER STAGES OF LIFE. KEEPING THIS IN MIND IT IS JUST A MATTER OF HOW TO ASSIST THEM TO FIGHT THESE CONTRAINTS.

SOCIAL FUNCTION

RESIDENTIAL

1

2

CREATE SOCIAL SPACE SERVING PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT PROGRAM

SERVICE

STAIRS

3

SERVICES AND CIRCULATION OF THE UNITS ARE PUSHED TO THE SIDE ALLOWING FLEXIBLE LIVING SPACE

4

PORTION OF REAR END OF UNITS OFFSET FROM BOUNDARY ALLOWING VIEW AND VENTILATION

P L A N S G E N E R A L

GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1:200

ROOF PLAN 1:200 ROOF DINING AREA

ENTRACE TO BASEMENT

PLANTING AREA

A

A

ROOF GARDEN BARBEQUE AREA

ROOF DINING AREA DRYING AREA

ROOF GARDEN

PLANTING AREA BARBEQUE AREA

DRYING AREA

SOCIAL WORKER OFFICE ADMIN AND RECEPTION FOR THE ELDERLY COMMUNITY CENTRE

GAME ROOM CASINO-LIKE GAME ROOM RUN

BY SOCIAL WORKERS FOR ELDERLIES THAT DOES NOT INVOLVE REAL MONEY

N

N

UNIT/STAIR CONFIGURATION

A

A

B

B

C

B

A

A

A

A

B

A

REGARDING THE IDEA OF AGING IN PLACE, THERE ARE 3 STRATEGIES INTRODUCED. FIRSTLY, IF THERE ARE SINGLE ELDERLIES LIVING IN ISOLATION, THE OBJECTIVE IS TO CHECK ON THEM REGULARLY. THE SOCIAL WORKER ON SITE CAN SCEDULE VISITS TO THE,M. VERTIALLY CONNECTED ROW HOUSES DIVIDES RESIDENTS INTO SMALLER GROUPS SO THEY CAN GET FAMILIAR WITH EACH OTHER EASIER. EACH ROW OF HOUSES HAVE INDIVIDUAL MAILBOX, AN OVER-FLOWING MAILBOX WILL ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS TO CHECK ON THEIR NEIGHBOURS. SECONDLY, THE DESIGN OF UNITS ALLOWS CHANGE ON UNIT CONFIGURATION THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE DIFFERENT FAMILY TYPE, IT CAN ALLOW FAMILY TO LIVE CLOSE BUT RETAIN PRIVACY. FOR EXAMPLE THE GRAND PARENTS CAN LIVE IN ONE UNIT AND THE COUPLE LIVING ABOVE, WITH THEIR OWN LIVING SPACES AND FACILITIES.

SECTION A-A

THIRDLY, AN ELDERLY FOCUSED COMMUNITY BUILDING RUN BY SOCIAL ORGANISATION PRIVIDES SERVICES THAT HELPS ELDERLIES SOCIALY AND PHYSIOLOGICALLY TO ENSURE THAT ELDERLIESâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; LIVES ARE NOT RESTRICTED BY FUNCTIONAL DEGRADATION.

EDENâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S ARM

3D MODELLING ELECTIVE MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE 2018

B A S E

L O G I C

HEXAGON LOGIC

LETTICE LOGIC

OVERVIEW The brief of the project is to combine two parametric logic into one and apply it to a body apart.

A P P L I C A T I O N HEXAGON LOGIC APPLICATION

03

LETTICE LOGIC APPLICATION

AGORA

GRADUATION STUDIO MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE 2019 OVERVIEW As society develops, certain typologies become redundant and the buildings need new purpose.

The brief is to design a new architectural museum and proposes the Domain Carpark as the rebuilding site as car parking demand is lowering in inner city.

The brief requires the proposed architectural museum considers urban, social and theoretical aspects that investigates the purpose of museum and meanwhile benefit the commuity.

04

URBAN AGENDA THEORETICAL AGENDA SOCIAL AGENDA Train Coverage •

King’s Cross Station usage is overloaded.

•

Although surrounding train stations are within walking distance, they are not easily accessible.

Traffic •

Width of pedestrian walk is too narrow.

•

4 lanes road without traffic light leading to

FOOD INDUSTRY HEAT MAP

AREAS AROUND SITE

MIXED USE ZONE

MAJOR TRAFFIC

highway in front of the site.

•

Area choked by high speed road, not accessible for visitors.

•

Woolloomooloo has thriving food industry.

•

overlay of mixed used zone map and food industry heat map shows that the food industry unable to grow around the area of the site.

R E S E A R C H

Food Industry

URBAN AGENDA THEORETICAL AGENDA SOCIAL AGENDA Theory of Postproduction “It is no longer a matter of elaborating a form on the basis of a raw material but working with objects that are already in circulation on the cultural market, which is to say, objects already informed by other objects.”

Nicolas Bourriaud theory of postproduction

Postproduction in Domain Carpark •

There are different types of components made from concrete for specific funtion in the carpark. i.e. the waffle ceiling that efficiently spread load and reduced weight due to less use of concrete with the waffle shape.

These types can be adapted, manipulated, post produced for new functions.

R E S E A R C H

•

SOCIAL AGENDA THEORETICAL AGENDA SOCIAL AGENDA Art being commercialised •

Museums have evolved from private institutes to public institutes over the course of a century.

•

However it is observed that public museums are operating like private museum with public fund.

•

Art and the experience of visiting museums are commercialised. It is skewed towards wowing factors than educating purpose of a museum.

Unchecked power of the public museum •

The curator/museum, mainly running using public fund, has a great power to define what is good art by selecting pieces to display in the museum, without the need to consult the public.

• •

To stop art and museum from being commercialised, we need to look at them as public matters.

Meaning the public should have a platform to voice their opinion.

Benefit • •

The experience of visiting museum will become two sided instead of one sided. visitors can learn more through debating.

R E S E A R C H

Shifting the paradigm

DESIGN

PRINCIPLES

TO RETURN MUSEUM/ART TO THE PUBLIC, IT HAS TO BE TREATED AS PUBLIC PROPERTY/MATTER. SIMILAR TO A COUNCIL ASKING CITIZENS FOR OPINION ON A NEW DEVELOPMENT, THE MATTER OF WHAT IS GOOD ART SHOULD ALSO BE ALLOWED TO DISCUSSED ON A PUBLIC PLATFORM. LOOKING AT THE AGORA FROM ATHENS, THERE ARE MANY BUILDING TYPOLOGIES THAT FACILITATES DIFFERENT TYPE OF DEBATE AND DISCUSSION. THE PRINCIPLES FOR THE DESIGN IS TO LEARN AND EXTRACT ELEMENTS FROM THE AGORA AND APPLY THEM TO THE DESIGN.

Odeon of Agrippa

Middle Stoa

Heliaia Homer A. Thompson, 5. The Athenian Agora, second century A.D. The Agora at Athens and the Greek Market Place. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 13, No. 4 (Dec., 1954), pp.9-14, University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians.

Middle Stoa

Middle Stoa

Odeon of Odeon of Agrippa

Agrippa

Heliaia

Heliaia

S T R R A T E G Y U R B A N

ADDITIONAL TRAIN STATION FOR THE GROWING POPULATION OF WOOLLOOMOOLOO TO SPREAD LOAD OF EXISTING TRAIN STATIONS

RETAIN

ROOF GARDEN FOR PUBLIC USE

SLOW DOWN SIR JOHN YOUNG CRES. BY ADDING TRAFFIC LIGHTS AND REDIRECTING TRAFFIC TO M1 TO BETTER CONNECT THE SITE TO WOOLLOOMOOLOO.

Schedule of Area Area (sqm) 9780 500 340 260 300 430 235 875 150 2100

4080 1000 630 340 1200 2170

R/F Roof Garden 2/F Exhibition area Cafe Museum Store Balcony Architect Workshop Lecture Room 1/F Exhibition Area Meeting Room Storage & Exhibition Workshop G/F Exhibition Area Restaurant Library Office Storage Carpark

Domain Entrance

Proposed Train Station Entrance

RF

+7.8m Roof Garden

2F

+5.2m Exhibition Area Cafe Museum Store Balcony Architect workshop Lecture Room Info & Access Control

1F

Underground Walkway Entrance

+2.6m Exhibition Area Meeting Room Storage Exhibition Workshop

GF

Carpark Entrance

+0.0m

Exhibition Area Restaurant Library Office Storage Carpark Info & Access Control

Exhibition Space Public Function Utilities Sir John Young Cres Entrance

DEMOLITION THE EXISTING BUILDING HAS A 2.2M CEILING HEIGHT, FLOOR SLABS ARE DEMOLISHED TO CREATE MORE CEILING HEIGHT FOR EXHIBITION SPACE. RF

+7.8m

STRUCTURE 2F

+5.2m

1F

+2.6m

GF

+0.0m

THE STRUCTURE OF THE BUILDING MAINLY UTILISES THE EXISTING STRUCTURE. FEW COLUMNS HAVE BEEN ADDED AT THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF EXHIBITION B AS THE SPACE IS LARGE AND EXISTING COLUMNS IN THE MIDDLE ARE REMOVED. THE ADDITIONAL COLUMNS HELP SPREAD LOAD OF THE ROOF.

POST PRODUCTION VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE EXISTING BUILDING ARE REPURPOSED FOR NEW FUNCTION. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ORIGINAL FROSTED GLASS FOR STAIRCASE IN CARPARK ARE USED AS WALLS FOR A SMALL DISPLAY AREA. HOLLOW BRICKS ORIGINALLY ON G/F ARE USED AS WALLS FOR MULTI-MEDIA EXHIBITION SPACE. THE WAFFLE CEILINGS ARE USED AS WALLS THAT ALSO GIVE TEXTURE TO THE SPACE.

P L A N S

ENTRANCE

G E N E R A L

PROPOSED TRAIN STATION

N

RF PLAN 1:2000

ENTRANCE

N

N

1F PLAN 1:2000

2F PLAN 1:2000

A

B

C

B

C

EXHIBITION AREA

A ENTRANCE

WIDENED PUBLIC OUTDOOR AREA

N

GF PLAN 1:1000

Exhibit

Pitch

Exhibit

EXHIBITION A

EXHIBITION B

EXHIBITION SPACE A IS DESIGNED FOR EXHIBITING AND PITCHING PROPOSALS FOR

EXHIBITION B IS THE CENTRAL HUB OF THE

MEDIUM GROUPS. IT IS INTENDED FOR ONE SPEAKER, THE SIZE AND SCALE OF THE

MUSEUM,

SPACE ALLOW INTIMATE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE SPEAKER AND THE AUDIENCE.

IT

IS

INTENDED

FOR

SCATTERED

DISCUSSION. VISITORS DISENGAGE THROUGH THE COLUMNS INTO A STOA-LIKE AREA TO ENGAGE

THE FLOOR OPENINGS ARE ALSO ACCOMPANY WITH SKYLIGHT TO FOCUS ON THE SPEAKER.

MORE INTIMATE CONVERSATION

Exhibit

Lecture

EXHIBITION C EXHIBITION

C

IS

DESIGNED

FOR

EXHIBITING AND LECTURING. WHEN EXHIBITING, THE DISTANCE OF THE BENCHES ALLOWS WORKS BE DISPLAYED BETWEEN THEM AND HAVE VISITORS SIT AROUND FOR DISCUSSION. THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS ON THE SIDE REMAIN OPEN. WHEN THERE IS A LECTURE, THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS ARE CLOSED AND THE AUDIENCE CAN FOCUS ON THE SPEAKER

FAST TRACK THE ORGANISATION OF THE GALLERY SPACES IS MEANT TO BE FREE FLOW THEREFORE A FAST TRACK IS CREATED FOR EASY CIRCULATION AROUND THE MUSEUM.

UNDER A QUIET ENVIORNMENT.

DIGITAL STUDIO MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE 2018 OVERVIEW

The brief of the project is to design two of the new metro station in sydney of our choice.

Our focus is sociopetal space meaning space that encourage users to be social as metro stations are public space as well as transportation.

The project aims to develop a parametric model that can allocate and evaluate the sociopetalness of a given space.

Such model is able to generate plans in different sites under certain parameters.

R E S E A R C H

SOCIO AUTOMATA

Seating patterns and patient behavior in an experimental dayroom.

Holahan, Charles J., â&#x20AC;&#x153;Seating patterns and patient behavior in an experimental dayroom.â&#x20AC;? (1971). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 February 2014. 1434.

The experiment tested the influence of different seating patterns on social behaviors.

The four patterns are socio-petal, socio-fugal, mixed and free.

Under a 45 minutes session, different groups were introduced to these settings and be observed their interaction, the most social participants were chosen to conduct the experiments.

They were accessed under the following behavior:

Social Nonaggressive Verbal Conversation Games Food Cigarettes Nonverbal Games Food Cigarettes Exchanging other objects Aggressive Verbal Nonverbal

Nonsocial Directed Activity Games Food Supplied Reading Other Reading Writing Passive It is found that with sociopetal settings, both social and verbal activities are highest, following by mixed settings, sociofugal and free settings score least.

05

From this study, it is understood that sociopetal settings do have influence on social interaction and effort should be made to design space into more sociopetal for better user experience. And spaces designed to be sociofugal for specific function should also be carefully designed since from the experiment it is noticed that free space (undesigned space) scored poorly in both social and nonsocial activities.

Sociopetal

Sociofugal

Mixed

Free

SOCIOPETAL

SOCIOFUGAL

Space ratio

Keyword, fast paced, efficient, on-the-go, function, repel

Keyword: stillness, rest, communicate, gather, attract

Space density

V S

S OCI OF UGA L

S I T E

Intersection

A N A L Y S I S

t

t

ee

tree

Str

ip S

gh

STRE COPE

AD NY RO

DHAM WYN

STRE

RAGLAN STREET RAGLAN STREET

WATERLOO TOWERS PARKLANDS AD

LAND

LAND

LANE

LANE

ET

JOHN

ARK

REET ST COPE

NY BOTA

ET DHAM

STRE NA BREN

WATERLOO SITE

WYN

UE

AVEN

REET N ST

ER

GE ST GEOR

IA P

DR XAN

ALE

ET

STRE

REET

STRE

ROAD

LAND

BUCK

VOY

MCE

ET

STRE

ET STRE PITT

ET STRE WEST

NY

BOTA

T

BUCK

POW

MARTIN PLACE SITE

GEOR

ROAD NY BOTA

ET

STRE

COOP

BUCK

REET ER ST

LANE

ROAD

MLC Centre

REET

ET STRE COPE

STRE DHAM WYN

ET STRE WYN

GARD

DHAM

STRE RD GERA

PHIL

LI

RE PS ST

ET

WAS

REET EN ST

ET

LANE

RO AD MIT CH

SALL

BUCK

ET

STRE

PARK

Lees C o ur t

Rowe Street

Lindt

RSON

ET

N STRE

NGTO

WELLI

ANDE

MACQUARIE STREE

CASTLEREAGH

STREET

PITT STREET

Tiffany Co.

LAND

Westpac

PHILLIP STREET

Commonwealth Bank

PROPOSED

Rolex Prada

SITE AREA: APPRO X. 9,315 sqm

Empario Armani

T

Tesla

ELIZABETH STREE

Omega

PROPOSED

ELL

Hosking Place Angel Place

THE PROGRAMS IN MARTIN PLACE ARE MOSTLY COMMERCIAL AND MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL IN WATERLOO, WITH A FEW PARKS FOR RECREATION.

ET

METRO LINE

METRO LINE

ce

REET GE ST

N RO

ERSO

HEND

Domain Terra

ER ST

STREET

COOP

BELOW

AD RO VY DA

HUNTER

VICE ORâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;S LL NCE CHA OVAL

EN

ET

GARD

MACQUARIE STREE

RE

ET

T

ST

BELOW

ER

/ ALL TS ETB OUR SK BA NIS C TEN

NT

RE PLACE

WATERLOO TOWERS PARKLANDS

BOTA

ET STRE

SHAKESPEA

HU

BOTH MARTIN PLACE AND WATERLOO SITES ARE SURROUNDED BY BUILDINGS. WHILE MARTIN PLACE GENERALLY CONSISTS OF HIGH RISES AND WATERLOO HAS MIDDLE TO LOW RISE BUILDINGS.

ET

Phill

Bli

Ham

ilton

Street

PITT STREET

S O CIA L PETAL

Static-dynamic separation

IT IS NOTICED THAT THERE IS A LACK OF PUBLIC SPACE FOR GATHERING, SOCIALISING, MEET UP AND PERFORMANCE. THEREFORE, OTHER THAN TRANSPORTATION, FOCUS IS PUT ON CREATING PUBLIC SPACES THUS THE RESEARCH ON SOCIOPETAL AND SOCIOFUGAL SPACES.

3m

3m

center =

sum of Condition

Then

THE PLAN GENERATION PROCESS AIMS TO CREATE PLANS THAT ARE UNEXPECTED BUT MEET CRITERIA FOR SPECIFIC FUNCTION. STEP 1: CELLULAR AUTOMATA random 1 and 0 points are input into the function to generate dierent types and versions of plans. The functions are result of continuous experimentation that will give the plan a certain characteristics.

And

IF

C E L L U L A R

A U T O M A T A

CELLULAR AUTOMATA

MECHANISM 1: CELLULAR AUTOMATA IS AN EVALUATION SYSTEM AT FIRST, IT WOULD EVALUATE THE POINTS AROUND THE BASE POINT(RED), AND THEN TRANSFORM THE BASE POINT IF CONDITIONS ARE MET. THEN MOVE ON TO EVALUATE THE NEXT POINT.

Otherwise

Becomes

Stays

If True

If False

MECHANISM 2: RULES ARE SET UP, IF THE CONDITION AROUND THE BASE POINT(CENTRE POINT) MEETS THE RULES. THEN BASE POINT WILL BE TRANSFORMED IN TO AN OPPOSITE STATUS. OTHERWISE IT STAYS THE SAME.

<3

TYPE VARIATIONS

FUNCTION ASSOCIATION

Text of the Vernacular Coates, P., "Text of the Vernacular." p.145-150. Proramming. Architecture.

This section of is within the book “Programming Architec0, if(n=0,1,if(n<4,0,1)),if(n<3,0,if(n>5,0,1))) 4 if(x =process Type 1it if(x ture”, is= 1,if(n<4,0,if(n<7,1,0)),if(n=2,1,if(n=4,1,0))) examined since during the Type design it is decided that Cellular Automata will be the tool to generate plans for the metro station, however method of interpreting the CA result was not determined yet. This articles shows one way of interpretation.

San’a is the capital of Yemen, it has been recognised as the 0, if(n≤1,1,if(n<4,0,1)),if(n<4,0,if(n=5,0,1))) Type 2 if(x =of if(x = 0, studied if(n≤3,0,if(n≥6,0,1)),if(n≤1,0,if(n≥6,0,1))) Type 5was example urban morphology, the region and researchers attempt to regenerate the morphology with the priciples they found with CA. The study shows a high degree of sohpistication and it also shows how the parameters affect the result of the morphology.

Type 3

if(x = 0, if(n=0,1,if(n<4,0,1)),if(n≥7,0,if(n=3,0,1)))

Type 6

sociofugal

sociopetal

Retail Food Cafe Washroom Staff Info center Landscaping Indoor Outdoor

Circulation Social Seating Theatre Recreation Garden Skylight Indoor Outdoor

if(x = 0, if(n≤3,0,if(n≥6,0,1)),if(n=2,0,if(n=4,0,1)))

The method is translated into the metro station design in two ways.

Firstly, in the study it is shown that if each 9 cells generate a RULES SETTING: certain form, it would change to a specific new form, howevHAS MASSIVE IMPACT contain ON THE RESULTING erRULES in the the cells could more than just 1 and 0, rather THE TRANSFORMATION. it FORM can OF contain more, that is transltae to garden, built area, roads that is more than need for the metro station design, it A CAREFUL EXPERIMENTATION OF DIFFERENT requires a simpler solution, and therefore a table of function CREATE PLAN TYPES THAT HAS UNIQUE is RULES listed that represents 1 and 0 that could be translate from CHARACTERISTICS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR a DIFFERENT diagram PURPOSES. to a plan.

Secondly, the parameters, it is noticed that the result differs as they change the probability of road occuring during CA.

Type 1

APPLICATION: THE RESULT OF CELLULAR AUTOMATA HAS NO if(x = 1,if(n<4,0,if(n<7,1,0)),if(n=2,1,if(n=4,1,0))) Type 2 if(x = 0, if(n≤1,1,if(n<4,0,1)),if(n<4,0,if(n=5,0,1))) MEANING IN ITSELF.

Type 3

BY ASSOCIATING ARCHITECTURAL FUNCTION TO THE BLACK AND WHITE POINTS. DESIGNERS CAN NOW TAKE MORE CONTROL OF THE OUTCOME AND MOVE TO STEP 2 WITH THE FUNCTION LIST if(x = 0, if(n=0,1,if(n<4,0,1)),if(n<3,0,if(n>5,0,1))) Type 4 if(x = 0, if(n≤3,0,if(n≥6,0,1)),if(n≤1,0,if(n≥6,0,1))) IN MIND.

E V U A L U A T I O N

WATERLOO STATION PLAN EVALUATION PLATFORM

1

Petal vs Fugal ratio

16/9 = 1.77 2

3

F:P ratio: 0.324

F cluster %: 0.034

0.358

F:P ratio: 0.298

F cluster %: 0.000

0.298

F:P ratio: 0.400

F cluster %: 0.000

0.400

F:P ratio: 0.373

F cluster %: 0.000

0.373

F:P ratio: 0.597

F cluster %: 0.068

0.665

F:P ratio: 0.515

F cluster %: 0.102

0.617

F:P ratio: 0.324

F cluster %: 0.000

0.324

F:P ratio: 0.348

F cluster %: 0.102

0.450

12/13 = 0.92

Petal vs Fugal cluster difference

10/25 - 2/25 = 0.21

5/25 - 6/25 = -0.04

cluster where centre =

and neighbour sum of

>4

cluster where centre =

and neighbour sum of

>4

Petal cluster percentage

5/25 = 0.2

STEP 2: EVALUATION the pool of plans get evaluated.

A set of data will be extracted for each plan that shows the planâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;sunderlying structure. And these data will be evaluated base on the criteria for a specific function of a space.

Platform

EVALUATION SYSTEM

2/25 = 0.08

THE PURPOSE OF RESULTS FROM CELLULAR AUTOMATA IS TO GENERATE A POOL OF PLAN FROM RANDOM POINTS. THE EVALUATION SYSTEM IS TO FILTER THE BEST PLANS BASE ON CRITERIAS FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES.

PLANS ARE GIVEN A SCORE AFTER EVALUATION. FOR EXAMPLE, PLATFORM LEVEL REQUIRES MORE CIRCULATION, WHILE STEET LEVEL REQUIRES MORE PETAL CLUSTER FOR SOCIALISING.

P:F cluster dif.: 0.068

P cluster %: 0.314

2.165

P:F ratio: 0.865

P:F cluster dif.: 0.021

P cluster %: 0.285

2.128

P:F ratio: 1.126

P:F cluster dif.: 0.161

P cluster %: 0.363

2.075

P:F ratio: 1.088

P:F cluster dif.: 0.140

P cluster %: 0.370

2.140

P:F ratio: 1.034

P:F cluster dif.: 0.110

P cluster %: 0.321

2.176

P:F ratio: 1.070

P:F cluster dif.: 0.112

P cluster %: 0.334

2.150

P:F ratio: 0.821

P:F cluster dif.: -0.014

P cluster %: 0.293

2.100

P:F ratio: 0.918

P:F cluster dif.: 0.074

P cluster %: 0.285

2.129

CONCOURSE LEVEL

P:F ratio: 0.637

P:F cluster dif.: 0.076

P cluster %: 0.021

1.582

P:F ratio: 0.702

P:F cluster dif.: 0.017

P cluster %: 0.040

1.726

P:F ratio: 0.666

P:F cluster dif.: 0.040

P cluster %: 0.074

1.700

P:F ratio: 0.654

P:F cluster dif.: 0.057

P cluster %: 0.019

1.616

P:F ratio: 0.721

P:F cluster dif.: 0.004

P cluster %: 0.042

1.759

P:F ratio: 0.747

P:F cluster dif.: 0.017

P cluster %: 0.095

1.825

P:F ratio: 0.760

P:F cluster dif.: 0.040

P cluster %: 0.093

1.813

P:F ratio: 0.887

P:F cluster dif.: 0.091

P cluster %: 0.172

1.968

S C H E M E

P:F ratio: 0.918

G R A S S H O P P E R

STREET LEVEL

CELLULAR AUTOMATA Random 1/0 Input Grid

+ Neighbour Sum

Random 1/0 Input

Cellular Automata

1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1

Random set of 1/0 created to map on grid

Cellular Automata Each point undergoes cellular automata with a set of predefined rules(expression),

Grid The creation of grid within a predefined boundary

Neighbour Sum

1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 n=5

The expression takes the input of the number and the neighbour sum of each cell to calculate if the number of the cell stays the same or changes.

The same process will repeat for an amount of time with anemone to obtain the final result.

Each cell will be analyzed against its closest 8 cells with the random 1/0 input mapped, and output a neighbour sum for each point.

EVALUATION Grid

Neighbour Sum

Evaluation

Evaluation The evaluation takes account of two types of data and analyse, first is amount of 1/0, second is neighbour sum.

Grid

SOMETIMES A FEW PLANS WOULD SCORE HIGH, THE DESIGNER WILL BE THE TIE-BREAKER TO CHOOSE THE BEST PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE.

The creation of grid within a predefined boundary

Neighbour Sum

1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 n=5

Each cell will be analyzed against its closest 8 cells with the CA result, and output a neighbour sum for each point.

At the end of the evaluation, there will be four results 1. 0/1 ratio 2. 1 cluster percentage 3. 0 cluster percentage 4. 0/1 cluster % difference where cluster means when the neighbour cells have more than 5 of the same type of number of the center cell.

The results will undergo further calculation set by criteria for different function to obtain a final score.

1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 cluster

1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 cluster

450 a 900 2a

1800 c

900 -2a 450 450 -a a

900 -2a

450 a 3150 x 1350 d 450 c

900 2a

1350 b

450 b

900 e

900 d

3150 x 1350 d

3150 x 900 e

3150 x 1350 e

450 c

450 c

450 b

1350 b

900 b

450 c

3150 x 1350 d

3150 x 1800 d

3150 x 2250 d

450 c

450 c

450 b

450 c

450 b

900 b

450 c

450 b

900 e

900 d

900 d

900 d

3150 x 1350 d

3150 x 900 e

3150 x 1350 e

3150 x 1350 e

450 c

450 c

450 b

450 c

450 a

900 2a 450 a

900 2a 450 a

450 -a

1800 c

900 b

900 d

3150 x 2250 d

1350 b

900 b

450 c

450 b

3150 x 1350 d

3150 x 1800 d

3150 x 2250 d

3150 x 2250 d

450 c

450 c

450 b

450 c

450 a

3150 x

450 c

450 c

450 b

3150 x

3150 x 2700 c

3150 x 1800 c

3150 x 2250 c

2700 c

1350 b

900 b

450 b

450 b

900 2a

1350 b

3150 x 1800 d

450 -a

3150 x

450 450 -a a 900 b

450 b

900 2a

3150 x 2250 c

3150 x 2250 d

900 2a 450 a

1350 b

900 b

450 c

450 c

900 2a 450 a

450 c

3150 x 2250 c

450 b

900 d

450 a

3150 x 1350 d

900 b

3150 x

3150 x 1350 e

450 a

450 c

900 2a 2700 c

450 b

900 2a

3150 x 1800 d

450 b

450 c

3150 x

3150 x 2700 c

3150 x 1800 c

3150 x 2250 c

2700 c

1350 b

900 b

450 b

450 b

450 a 450 a

TABLE

900 2a

1350 b

/a+a\ 3150 x

900 -2a

CANOPY

900 b

/ 2a \ 3150 x 2250 d 450 -a

2700 c

/a\

450 b

450 b

+a/-2a

3150 x 2700 c

a + 2a + a

3150 x 2250 d

450 b

a + 2a

3150 x 2700 c

a+a+a

450 c

450 b

a+a

450 c

2a

3150 x 2250 d

C O M P O N E N T

a

450 b

W A L L

SEATING WINDOW

450 a 450 a

900 2a 900 2a

450 a 450 a

450 a 450 a

900 2a 450 a 900 2a 450 a

900 2a 450 a 900 2a 450 a

900 2a 450 -a

450 450 -a a

900 -2a

450 a 900 2a

900 2a

450 a

CHOOSE SECTION CREATE MOULD

450 450 -a a

CAST CONCRETE RESULT

THE WALL IS CONSIDERED THE ELEMENT FOR PARAMETRIC DESIGN AS PART OF THE BRIEF.

A MATRIX WALL EXTRUSION IS CREATED TO SUIT DIFFERENT PURPOSES. CHOSEN SECTIONS WILL BE LOFTED TOGETHER TO CREATE A WALL.

A DEVICE IS INVENTED PARAMETRIC WALL. TO REALISE THE

P cluster %: 0.314

2.165

P:F ratio: 0.865

P:F cluster dif.: 0.021

P cluster %: 0.285

2.128

P:F ratio: 1.126

P:F cluster dif.: 0.161

P cluster %: 0.363

2.075

P:F ratio: 1.088

P:F cluster dif.: 0.140

P cluster %: 0.370

2.140

P:F ratio: 0.637

P:F ratio: 1.034

P:F ratio: 0.666

P:F cluster dif.: 0.076

P:F cluster dif.: 0.110

P:F cluster dif.: 0.040

P cluster %: 0.021

P cluster %: 0.321

P cluster %: 0.074

1.582

2.176

1.700

P:F ratio: 0.702

P:F ratio: 1.070

P:F ratio: 0.654

F:P ratio: 0.324 P:F ratio: 0.821

P:F cluster dif.: -0.014

P cluster %: 0.293

2.100

P:F ratio: 0.918

Platform

P:F cluster dif.: 0.017

P:F cluster dif.: 0.112

P:F cluster dif.: 0.057

P cluster %: 0.040

P cluster %: 0.334

P cluster %: 0.019

F cluster %: 0.034 P:F cluster dif.: 0.074

1.726

2.150

1.616

0.358 P cluster %: 0.285

2.129

STREET LEVEL P:F ratio: 0.721

P:F cluster dif.: 0.004

P cluster %: 0.042

1.759

P:F ratio: 0.747

F:P ratio: 0.298

P:F ratio: 0.760

P:F cluster dif.: 0.040

P cluster %: 0.093

1.813

P:F ratio: 0.887

P:F cluster dif.: 0.017

P cluster %: 0.095

F cluster %: 0.000

P:F cluster dif.: 0.091

1.825

0.298

P cluster %: 0.172

1.968

F:P ratio: 0.400

F cluster %: 0.000

0.400

F:P ratio: 0.373

F cluster %: 0.000

0.373

F:P ratio: 0.597

F cluster %: 0.068

F:P ratio: 0.515

F cluster %: 0.102

0.617

F:P ratio: 0.324

F cluster %: 0.000

0.324

F:P ratio: 0.348

F cluster %: 0.102

CONCOURSE LEVEL 0.665

0.450

PLATFORM LEVEL

P L A N S

P:F cluster dif.: 0.068

G E N E R A L

P:F ratio: 0.918

GRADUATION STUDIO BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURE IN DESIGN

2018

OVERVIEW The brief of the proejct is to design a new museum behind the mint in Martin Place.

The project has two aims.

R E S E A R C H

CAVE

URBAN DESIGN STRATEGY

First, to provide cave-like experience for users as a getaway from the busy city life.

Second, to provide a connection between Gallery of NSW and the St. James train station.

CAVE ANALYSIS

06

CAVE FORMATION

01

02

wid

er

op

en

+m

ore

lig

ht

03

04

05

06

tig

ht

AXONOMETRIC | CIRCULATION

Access to CAVE Gallery Common area of CAVE Gallery and Mint Gallery Access from Mint Gallery to CAVE Gallery

HKU LECTURE THEATRE AD+RG YEAROUT 2016 OVERVIEW The brief is to design a lecture theatre for the new academic building of the Hong Kong University.

The design aims to create a striking but minimal feeling with the use of bold gesture and two colour tone for contrast.

07

8 150 800

2275

1925

1100

1800

7600

5000

4300

12950

540

1800

1050 135.55 135.197

7700 7700 132.608

131.667

2275

3550

135.50

1450

20°

2150

1950

G

1150

25350

8800 G 5900

14 18150 4800

14

135.50 131.55

131.50

7

S.O.P.

4400

200

8800

131.50

50

3500

15°

1100

F

131.785

F

131.902

132.020

132.138

132.225

132.491

8800

132.726

8800

132.844

132.961

133.079

133.197

133.314

2150

133.432

E

133.550

1150

133.667

E

133.785

1400

133.902

134.020

134.138

134.225

134.373

134.491

134.608

134.726

300

134.844

134.961

1800

135.079

350

135.314

100 150 R9 00

150

100

3350

150 100 1300

135.432

2075

50

SECTION 3850

5900 H

1050

LAYOUT PLAN PROJECTOR H