MICA King's College Cambridge Masterplan Development Stage 2

Page 1


King’s College, Cambridge Master Plan Development

Introduction Consultation Opportunities Accessibility Sustainability Case Studies

Who We Are

Stuart Cade Director, Project Director

Jessie Turnbull

Associate Director, Masterplanner, Consultation, Student Living Specialist

Mandy Franz

Associate Director

Conservation Architect, Heritage

Jacob Spence Project Architect
Mark Tugman Education Specialist
Huseyin Bulbul Masterplan Architect Andy Long Environmental Engineer

Our Leaders

Strategic Masterplanning Retrofit / Housing / Estates

Educational Expert Principal Designer

Passivhaus Designer BIM/Modern Methods

Masterplanning Independent Schools

Education Experience Landscape Design

Transport-led Masterplan

James Roach
Gavin Miller
Paul Mullin
Victoria Timberlake
Jamie Lilley Estate Masterplan Sustainable School Design
Danusia Lewis
Paul Wynn Residential Design
Javier Rada Domingo Education and Residential Projects on Complex Sites
Jonathan Evans Conservation & Heritage Collegiate Experience
Will Armstrong Education Projects Regeneration, Mixed-use
Kelly Ordemann Project Management Masterplanning
Dave Jones Senior Technician Historic and sensitive settings

MICA and King’s Working Together

“MICA listen to their clients and are able to come up with inspired solutions for difficult problems.”

Amanda Saville, Librarian at The Queen’s College, Oxford

MICA Architects Declare Climate and Biodiversity Emergency

Trusted Partners

Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge

Christ’s College, Cambridge

Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge

Jesus College, Cambridge

St John’s College, Cambridge

Corpus Christi College, Oxford

Hertford College, Oxford

Keble College, Oxford

Jesus College, Oxford

Mansfield College, Oxford

Nuffield College, Oxford

Peking University, Oxford

Pembroke College, Oxford

The Queen’s College, Oxford

Oxford Brookes University

King’s College, London

University of Lancaster

East Ham Council

The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn

The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn

Ashmolean Museum, Oxford

Fairfield Halls, Croydon

National Maritime Museum, Greenwich

The South Bank Centre, London

The Wallace Collection, London

Harrow, Richmond & Uxbridge College

Cheng Yu Tung Building, Jesus College, Oxford Jesus College Masterplan, Oxford

Strategic masterplan for iconic heritage setting

National Maritime Museum addition

Mapping Christ’s future development

Activating the historic Bodley Library
A welcoming new Porters’ Lodge
New working library within the historic heart

Pragmatic solutions within a constrained budget

College, London

Estates, landscape and way-finding masterplan

Masterplan for a historic, compact, urban College

Iterative testing for dispersed sites

A 30-year relationship across two sites

Keble College Estates and Landscape Masterplan, Oxford

Park Road site and H B Allen Centre
H B Allen Centre with landscape quad
Raglan House for day pupils
The Sixth Form social and study centre

A new civic presence linking to Old Courts

Announcing Caius’ presence on the Market Square

Effective Consultation

What does Domus look like in 100 years?

What will Mill Lane bring to King’s?

What could Old School offer King’s?

Where can King’s access improve?

How do we consolidate sustainability strands?

A staged approach

MICA Collaboration

King’s College

MICA team

Steering Committee

Governing Body

Staff, Fellows, Students

Consultant team

– Confirm stakeholder engagement strategy

– Research and material consolidation

– Analysis of ownership, areas, demand

– Site visits and benchmarking

– Listening interviews, workshops, consultations

– Assessment of need across agreed work-streams

– Finalise terms of reference

– Steering Group collaborative review of GATHER

– Development of initial spatial interventions

– Preliminary identification of priority sequence

– Evaluation of synergies between access, energy and space

– Demonstration of how interventions respond to need

– Agree anchors for measures of success

– Steering Group collaborative review of TEST

– Design and creativity

– Collaboration with invested parties

– Demonstrate response to feedback on TEST

– Establishing order of cost per project

– Recommend phasing options

– Evocative visualisations

Understanding the College needs

What tools can we use to understand the needs of our target student population? The priorities of our stakeholders? The ambitions of our community partners?

Collective understanding of estate

Sessions that evoke untold stories and deeper information exchange. Enabling visualisation and first-hand experience of community.

Jessie touring Cranmer Road with Gonville & Caius College

Interactive workshops

Hands-on, experiential activities that encourage communication, collaboration and decision-making.

GATHER TEST RECOMMEND

Board-game as a method to draw out responses to site constraints

Evaluating existing data

Consolidating information from new and existing surveys, post-occupancy evaluations both at King’s and beyond, consulting archives and compiling the data.

Initial spatial interventions

Generating ideas in response to the needs identified at the testing stage and developing those into spatial solutions. Iteratively testing those again with the work-stream focus groups and wider stakeholders through workshops.

Demonstrating the metrics associated with each option or intervention to enable informed direction from the King’s client team.

Community evaluation

Establishing through consultation with steering group and key stakeholders how success is measured by the King’s community to allow evaluation of the success of each proposed intervention.

Ensuring that key criteria are agreed collectively and used as the driver to determine which elements to progress and RECOMMEND.

Demonstrating options through physical models
Example success matrix

Documenting outcomes

Consolidating the successful outputs into a single document for King’s review and approval, presenting the solutions to the stakeholders and focus groups and taking on board final feedback.

GATHER

Communicating complex 3d arrangements through cutaway isometric views

Documenting outcomes

Consolidating agreed recommendations into a single report first in draft format for comment by the college community, followed by a final report. A pithy executive summary, available as a standalone document, ensures that even the busiest contributor can access the outcomes of the masterplan.

Executive summary and images generated form the basis of material for fundraising.

Mapping Christ’s Future

We would like to ask:

What does Domus look like in 100 years?

What will Mill Lane bring to King’s?

What could Old Schools offer King’s?

Where can King’s access improve?

How best to consolidate sustainability strands?

The iconic heart of Cambridge

A wealth of sites require robust strategy to meet diverse aims and objectives. The operational sites—from the Sports Ground to the historic core College to the Mill Lane site—have a prominence in Cambridge and offer opportunities for this pivotal moment. We can help you bring these different sites together under one strategic vision.

Three central sites

What does Domus look like in 100 years?

Potential

How will the site handle the increase in undergraduate numbers?

When is the right time to electrify the kitchens?

Could the library and archive be better housed elsewhere?

How can the gardens be best used for renewable energy, well-being and biodiversity?

How best to handle the tourist flows?

What is the long term potential for Garden Hostel grounds?

Oxford,

Site Considerations

An iconic site with layered risks of flooding, archaeology and historical constraints of precious listed buildings that contribute significantly to Cambridge city centre

40-60 year flood extents

Key pedestrian route

College frontage

Historic shop-front

Existing important trees

Grade I listed buildings

Grade II listed buildings

Positive building/structure

Building of local interest

Listed park/garden boundary

Key positive view

Focal feature

Site Routes and Spaces

King’s College is defined by a primary axis that connects from King’s Parade to the Backs and other accommodation, while a secondary axis emerges with the integration of Mill Lane and Old Schools

Site Opportunities

Consolidating student-focused activities for well-being at the heart of Cambridge surrounded by biodiverse landscape

Renovation and energy upgrade opportunities to existing buildings, prioritising The Gibbs Building combined with upgrading the basement to become use-able space.

Replace existing kitchen, replanning it for optimisation and upgrading to electric.

Review progress on ground source heat pump studies and its potential across gardens and backs sites.

Bodley’s Court tree has been removed and now the intimate, student-facing court feels exposed. Consider extending the north range further west (in line with Bodley’s original plan.

Consolidate parking south of Garden Hostel and consider adding a new wing of accommodation to the hostel or independent construction flanking West Road.

Consider reconfiguration or new construction of garden buildings for wellness, performance and events, and to encourage their greater all-weather flexibility year-round

What will Mill Lane bring to King’s?

Potential

Could the site house 250 student rooms or more?

What ancillary spaces are required to meet diverse needs?

How much of the site should be accessible to the public?

Can social and quiet study spaces complement the existing library space?

Mix of facade qualities on Silver Street, constrained public realm
Rooftop rooms in Chen Yu Tung Building, Jesus College, Oxford,
View into “poor quality feature” yard from Mill Lane Social study spaces integrated with

MILL LANE SITE RISKS

Site Considerations

The acquisition of the Mill Lane site offers great potential for College growth with a large urban site, with handsome existing buildings and potential to house up to 250 students comfortably. However, the site is highly constrained, fronted by narrow streets, and packed with locally significant buildings.

• Working in the setting of the Grade II listed Pitt Building

• Narrow street access on all four sides

• Working across the thoroughfare of Laundress Lane

• Positive Buildings recognised in the Historic Core Appraisal of 2017 include Stuart House, the Lecture Halls, and the oast house in Miller’s Yard

• Existing building heights range from two to four storeys

• Mill Lane provides vehicular access to the University Centre and Hilton Hotel

• Silver Street is a heavily trafficked pedestrian route leading to the Mill Pond

• Anchor is a well-loved pub and Cambridge landmark

• Options for retention vs. deconstruction.

Example retaining listed buildings with new construction on four sides

40-60 year flood extents

Key pedestrian route

Historic shop-front

Potential habitat corridor

Existing important trees

Grade I listed buildings

Grade II listed buildings

Positive building/structure

Building of local interest

Proposal for deconstruction

Key positive view

Focal feature

Routes and Spaces

Mill Lane benefits from a convenient link from the King’s Domus site along Queen’s Lane to the existing portal, or new gateway on Silver Street. The site is generous and can house one large or interlinked smaller courtyards, protected from the public realm to create a pleasant and calm College environment.

The Mill Lane Routes and Spaces

• The approach to retention offers different space alignments, however both have in comment an axis East - West for students within Mill lane and a South - North axis connecting it to the main campus and offering a route through for all.

OPENING UP ROUTES TO THE MILL POND

• This opportunity allows the city to breath and Kings to offer an open door for entrances and retention of shops.

• Improvement of boundary and solid walls to green walls

CENTRAL STUDENT FOCUSED SPACE

Example of urban stitching tested in physical models

MILL LANE SCOPE Opportunities

An exciting opportunity for judicious retrofit and reuse of characterful existing buildings as appropriate, carefully planned to account for future flexibility, dynamic and unique College accommodation. Balance to the rich architectural legacy of the King’s estate to support contemporary insertions woven into locally significant historic fabric.

The Mill Lane Considerations and Risks

• Consider retaining some of the press building and retrofitting as accommodation

• Carefully de-construct interior elements and salvage materials where possible to open up various sized courts

• Linkages towards Domus site and internally along the length of the site to connect to the vibrant local community

• Rooftop extensions where possible.

• Silver Street to provide a new gateway.

• Complete courtyards through new interventions and create a King’s Presence on Silver Street

Elevated Student Court
New Gatehouse to Mill Lane Court New open court Potential of study and conference centre Mill Lane Court
New biodiverse university oasis Opening up space to punting station

MILL LANE SCOPE

Site Opportunities

An exciting opportunity for judicious retrofit and reuse of characterful existing buildings as appropriate, carefully planned to account for future flexibility, dynamic and unique College accommodation. Balance to the rich architectural legacy of the King’s estate to support contemporary insertions woven into locally significant historic fabric.

The Mill Lane Considerations and Risks

• Consider retaining some of the press building and retrofitting as accommodation

250-350

• Carefully de-construct interior elements and salvage materials where possible to open up various sized courts

• Linkages towards Domus site and internally along the length of the site to connect to the vibrant local community

• Rooftop extensions where possible.

• Silver Street to provide a new gateway.

• Complete courtyards through new interventions and create a King’s Presence on Silver Street

What could Old Schools offer King’s?

Potential

How could the historic courts of King’s be reintegrated into the College? Does a newly emphasised axis offer opportunities to relieve bottle necks?

Can previously dispersed activities be better accommodated here?

Does re-activating the Old Schools shift King’s centre of gravity?

Internal courtyard is dominated by bins, bikes and cars
New step-free entry and access at the Royal Horticultural Society HQ
Old Courts is immediately adjacent to the Clare Gate of King’s

OLD SCHOOLS SITE RISKS

Considerations

COCKERELL BUILDING (GONVILLE & CAIUS)

Analysing The Old Schools site potential, weighing impact on historically significant spaces and fabric A series of grand, awe-inspiring spaces, some with epic views paired with smaller areas that have been subdivided as offices and ancillary uses

Constraints:

– Grade I Listed buildings with large original rooms remain: high floor-to-ceiling heights; decorated ceiling or exposed roof structures, and large infrequent existing windows; such as former

– Spaces of note: Regent House, East-, Syndicate-and Council Rooms of Cobble Court.

– Ground level former Lecture Rooms are less suited to conversion to cellular accommodation

– Irregular and non-repetitive arrangements of characterful spaces limit ease of adaptive reuse for new functions.

– Limited existing step-free access to ground and upper levels, particularly West Court

– Extremely limited vehicular access along Trinity Lane

CHAPEL WEST COURT COBBLE COURT
Barren surfaced courts and parking
Large floor-to-ceilings and historic windows of Cobble Court

OLD SCHOOLS SITE SCOPE

Routes and spaces

Offers great potential for the College to bookend its already dramatic theatre set of architectural landmarks, giving new reading of King’s sense of campus, and would bring the Chapel into a more centralised position.

– Offers great potential for the College to bookend its already dramatic theatre set of architectural landmarks, giving new reading of King’s sense of campus, and would bring the Chapel into a more centralised position.

– A new college destination, returning the Old Courts of King’s College, with well-placed gatehouse in Trinity Lane and potential College link through the Chapel North Gate.

– Opportunity for reinterpretation of the current and original uses of the Old Schools buildings, whilst sympathetic to well-maintained highly significant fabric and fittings.

– Transform the underutilised internal courts, particularly West Court, as a new northern hub of King’s central site, with richly biodiverse green new landscaping giving pleasant outlook from inward-facing rooms.

– Potential for reinterpretation of the Grade II* Historic lawn between Chapel and the south ranges of The Old Schools.

Key pedestrian route

College frontage

Listed park/ garden

Key positive view

COCKERELL BUILDING (GONVILLE & CAIUS)

Potential to improve as desirable green spaces

Potential lodge and Chapel public access

Potential for biodiversity improvement

CHAPEL
FRONT COURT
WEST COURT COBBLE COURT
Prominent historic C15 gatehouse
West Court to regain heritage setting
Cobble Court could contrast West Court

OLD SCHOOLS SITE SCOPE Opportunities

Working judiciously with historically significant College fabric for new Domus site uses. Potential for outward-facing activities including conferences, alumni hub, exhibition space, King’s visitor centre and consolidating operational activities.

– Explore low-, medium-, and high-levels of impact to fabric,

– Structurally independent, reversible insertions that provide new accommodation

– Building fabric and energy use improvements

– Upgrade basement to become usable spaces

– Opportunity to prioritise office or student accommodation in locations with smaller floor-to-ceiling heights and with more frequent fenestration,

– Improving level access opportunities, particularly to West Court ranges.

– Possible relocation of Domus site offices, Fellows’ sets, common rooms and seminar rooms where they may be constrained to more generously sized settings in The Old Schools.

– Consider opportunity for conference accommodation in characterful and historically significant setting.

– Celebrate the grand spaces of Cobble Court which are in a good state of repair, as complimentary or replacement collegiate space to Domus site Renovation and energy upgrade opportunities, combined with upgrade to basement to become usable spaces.

Potential single-storey pavilion

Potential collegiate use

Re-landscaped courts

SENATE HOUSE

WEST COURT COBBLE COURT
COCKERELL BUILDING (GONVILLE & CAIUS)
Existing meeting room spaces
Characterful board room spaces
Decorative ceiling

Where can King’s access improve?

Access Improvements

Recognising the need for equality in the built environment is critical to ensuring the long-term success of a building to allow for more academic voices to be heard and encourage a diverse mix of people to share ideas.

Current access issues: many of the buildings a King’s have stepped access into and around them. Due to the age of the buildings the staircases do vary in materials and layout, and consideration must be given to the viability of interventions in precious historic assets.

Intuitive access

MICA specialises in creative solutions to existing conditions, particularly in historic contexts. We combine our expertise in graphic design, signage and way-finding, with judicious interventions to heritage settings to ensure that the experience of a person with physical disabilities is intuitive and smooth, with access to all shared amenities provide.

Lincoln’s Inn new and historic library link creates step free access to upper levels of historic building

Below: western end of King’s library has barriers to access

Left: New step free access to Collegiate spaces below east terrace unlocking access to all Collegiate spaces at Lincoln’s Inn

Above and right: Careful rotation of the spiral stair stone steps at Lincoln’s Inn by one tread allowed a step free route to be created at ground floor between new and old

East Ham Civic Centre extension link to Town Hall
Right:
Above: Bodley’s access
The East Range at Mansfield College allows stepfree access from the front court to Hall, Chapel, buttery and teaching spaces
Below: Bodley’s staircase

Consolidating Sustainability

Strategy Strands

A Greener King’s

Consolidating strands

King’s has a long-standing history of developing strategy and policies from organic grassroots movements. We would build on the excellent work already undertaken to de-carbonise the estate in tandem with interventions and upgrades to building fabric

Regenerative design overlay

Maximising the opportunities of Kings assets, buildings, land, water to develop a combined strategy which enriches the sustainable and regenerative position of Kings.

Being a good guardian and ancestor, creating a just space for its students and working with nature to improve buildings and landscapes.

Improving opportunities for active travel

QUEENS’ COLLEGE

Maximising renewable energy provision through solar/ GSHP/ ASHP systems Passive design: orientation and massing

Green roofs, rainwater harvesting and water management

PRINCIPALCOLLEGEAXIS POTENTIAL

CLARE COLLEGE

Resilience in water and flood management

PIECE

FELLOWS’ GARDEN

Protecting, enhancing, increasing biodiversity across the site

Enhancing links with landscape and local context Water-source Heat pump

Regenerative design overlay

The net zero trajectory

Delivering long-term site-wide benefits and a trajectory to net zero by 2030.

Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year) 145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year)

sequestration] other material TBC subject to further target < 750 kgCO₂e/m2[2030+B4 Target]

Carbon Ecology Wellbeing

Working with you to build on the pathway to net zero mapped by Ramboll, consolidating the strategy with proposed spatial interventions that emerge from the masterplan consultation.

kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

Connectivity and Transport (kgCO2e/km/person/year) Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections) measures

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts) Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

Ensuring that energy savings and cost benefits analysed alongside capital outlay and operational impacts.

and kgCO2/m2/year)

145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

Water Cycle (litres/person/day)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target and kgCO2/m2/year)

subject to further

Target]

(20.81 TBC) RIBA 2030 Target for new office <10 l/p/day 225m2 rainwater harvesting at roof level

458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with Services engineer and BREEAM consultant, to bring down to target

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

Land Use and Biodiversity (increase in species) Significant improvement in planting, biodiversity and species Cycle Value (£/m2) Not yet calculated (POE anticipated)

(kgCO2e/km/person/year) Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections)

Communicating in a simple terms through graphic means that all members of the community can readily digest. Building in flexibility to adapt to changing conditions over coming decades

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

Design Performance Assessment 2024

Extracts from MICA’s interactive de-carbonisation model which offers simple scenario testing for various project priorities, effectiveness, the capital costs, operational costs and carbon reductions. Kings De-carbonisation plan (Ramboll)

Working with King’s to develop net zero strategy for new build and refurbishment projects in line with Ramboll de-carbonisation sequence

Combining masterplan, energy strategy and biodiversity measures

Wellbeing

day)

Regenerative buildings

Carbon Ecology

Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year) 145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

Developing new and existing buildings to standards and with sustainable principles the heart

Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year) sequestration] other material TBC subject to further target < 750 kgCO₂e/m2[2030+B4 Target]

Carbon Ecology Wellbeing

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target

458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

measures

Achieving the King’s net zero strategy within circular economy principles to develop low carbon buildings and existing structures optimised by fabric improvement fuelled by renewable energy

Wellbeing

Connectivity and Transport (kgCO2e/km/person/year) Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections)

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

Operational Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year) 145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

Water Cycle (litres/person/day)

Connectivity

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target

Embodied Energy and CO2 (kWh/m2/year and kgCO2/m2/year) carbon sequestration] other material TBC subject to further appointment - target < 750 kgCO₂e/m2[2030+B4 Target] 458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target and kgCO2/m2/year) subject to further

Target]

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

(20.81 TBC) RIBA 2030 Target for new office <10 l/p/day 225m2 rainwater harvesting at roof level

458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with Services engineer and BREEAM consultant, to bring down to target

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

Cycle Value (£/m2) Not yet calculated (POE anticipated)

(kgCO2e/km/person/year) Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections)

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

Land Use and Biodiversity (increase in species) Significant improvement in planting, biodiversity and species

Nature and well-being

Protecting and improving biodiversity, water and well-being for

kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy to bring down to target

(870 kg including B4)

Wellbeing SUSTAINABILITY

King’s

and within Cambridge

review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy to bring down B4 to target

(Existing site with excellent connections)

Wellbeing

schedule (Existing building, new light wells pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

calculated (Re-use of building)

MICA will work with the gardens team to help finalise the biodiversity strategy and bring on a suitable landscape architect to complete the Gardens Masterplan, enshrining biodiversity achievements and building on them to improve water use in the arid Cambridge setting. Enhance well-being through healthy buildings, access to nature and active travel.

How is it measured?

145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

with excellent quality and routes improved

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target

community improved value

458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

kgCO2/m2/year)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

145.6 kWh/m2GIA/yr (41 kWh base build)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, TM54 energy model assessor, to bring down to target

2030 Target for new office <10 l/p/day harvesting at roof level

Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections)

Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two-thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Groundcover planting.

Attenuation (mandatory)

Cambridge City Council guidance on storm-water management requires attenuation on site. All proposed new built sites to incorporate.

Rainwater

Harvesting rainwater for reuse in irrigation is low-cost and good futureproofing against irrigation restrictions. Can be installed as an intercept within attenuation systems. Recommended for all new and existing buildings, with priority given to those with planned works to roofs/gutters.

kgCO2/m2/year) further 458.5 kgCO2/m2 (870 kg including B4)

Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn).

review in Stage 3 with Services engineer consultant, to bring down to target

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

Design team to review in Stage 3 with NDY, WLCA energy model assessor, to bring down B4 to target

improvement in planting, biodiversity and species

Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

(kgCO2e/km/person/year) Not calculated (Existing site with excellent connections)

calculated (POE anticipated)

Spaced designed with excellent quality and routes improved

Refer summary schedule (Existing building, new light wells optimised to sun pattern, strategic flexible office layouts)

Sustainability Design Performance Assessment 2024

Sustainable community improved value

Not yet calculated (Re-use of building)

Water features (chlorinated) or unplanted detention basins.

Permeable paving.

Sealed surfaces (e.g. concrete, asphalt, waterproofing, stone).

Christ’s College example of water strategy

Grey-water

Harvesting grey-water (water used for washing or in kitchens) requires a series of filtration tanks and significant plant space. This is recommended for all new build aspects.

Black-water (challenging)

Harvesting black-water (water that has been used to flush toilets) is challenging and requires extensive plant space or landscape filtration beds.

Wild-flower meadow - a biodiversity journey
How will we accomplish this?

Programme

GATHER TEST RECOMMEND

Gathering and analysing information

Kick off meeting, establish key questions to solve, agree engagement strategy

Strategy and need review

16 weeks

Opportunities analysis

Development of design proposals

Launch consultation to Students and Fellows

Logistics and cost analysis

Summarise research, present early trajectory of design thoughts

Engagement with College

Analysis of options

19 weeks

Report on proposed solutions

Summary of College input at the end of term

Project meeting /workshop

Masterplan Issue

Masterplan draft report circulated to Fellowship

Solicit feedback

Cost plan refinement

20 weeks

Masterplan report finalised

Programme

GATHER TEST RECOMMEND

Analysis of options EASTER LONG VACATION

Gathering and analysing information

Kick off meeting, establish key questions to solve, agree engagement strategy

Strategy and need review

16 weeks

Opportunities analysis

Development of design proposals

Launch consultation to students and Fellows

Logistics and cost analysis

Summarise research, present early trajectory of design thoughts

Engagement with College

19 weeks

Report on proposed solutions

Summary of College input at the end of term

Project meeting /workshop

Masterplan Issue

Masterplan draft report circulated to Fellowship

Solicit feedback

Cost plan refinement

20 weeks

Masterplan report finalised

Programme

LONG VACATION

GATHER TEST RECOMMEND

Gathering and analysing information

Kick off meeting, establish key questions to solve, agree engagement strategy

Strategy and need review

16 weeks

Opportunities analysis

Development of design proposals

Launch consultation to students and Fellows

Logistics and cost analysis

Summarise research, present early trajectory of design thoughts

Engagement with College

Analysis of options

19 weeks

Report on proposed solutions

Summary of College input at the end of term

Project meeting /workshop

Masterplan Issue

Masterplan draft report circulated to Fellowship

Solicit feedback

Cost plan refinement

20 weeks

Masterplan report finalised

Why Us

30 years experience of collegiate masterplanning

Stakeholder focus

Working in sensitive and listed settings

Award winning sustainable design

Retrofit and Passivhaus expertise

Net zero leadership

Extensive range from strategy to detail

Inspiring spaces and places

Proven experience in delivering masterplans

Incremental and visionary approach

Thank You

Relevant Experience

Masterplanning Experience

Mapping Christ’s Future Masterplan, Christ’s College, Cambridge
Wellington College Masterplan, Berkshire, UK
Stowe School, Buckinghamshire ARCO Building, Keble College, Oxford
Greenwich Maritime Masterplan, London
The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn, London
Jesus College Masterplan, Oxford
Princeton University, New Jersey, USA

Working in dense, historic, iconic urban environments

Fora co-working space department store retrofit, Oxford
H B Allen Centre, Keble College, Oxford
Gray’s Inn, London
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford
Market Street public realm masterplan, Oxford

Christ’s College, Cambridge

Mapping Christ’s Future: improve access, utilisation and carbon

Client: Christ’s College Cambridge

Dates: 2023 Masterplan

2024-2026 Lodge

2024-2025 Bodley Library

Scope: Masterplanning, Lead Consultant, Architecture, Environmental Strategy, MEP, Feasibility Study, Heritage, Consultation

Relevance

– Large and varied historic campus

– A clear pathway to 30% carbon reductions by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2048

– Multiple choices to achieve goals and comprehensive phasing strategy

– Deep retrofit strategy for all buildings to achieve 30% energy savings to accord with maintenance plan

– Now an adopted strategy and underway

– Complex stakeholder engagement - using tailored consultation methods for a range of students, staff and alumni

– Strategy for development and regeneration of historic, Listed buildings in a constrained urban setting

Sketches of proposed improved education and accommodation facilities within refurbished existing building

Communication strategy and varied techniques to engage with client and stakeholders

Jesus College, Oxford

Living and Learning in the commercial heart of the city

Client: Jesus College Oxford

Dates: Appointment following design competition:

Phase 1 – 2017 - 2020

Phase 2 – 2022 (Accommodation)

Phase 3 – 2022 (Education Spaces and Landscape)

Phase 4 – Ongoing works to Retail spaces.

Scope: Masterplanning, MICA Lead Consultant, Architect

RIBA 0-7, Conservation, Landscape, Interior Design, Way-finding and Signage

Relevance

– A new gatehouse for the College facilitates outreach and access, and makes Jesus more accessible both physically and virtually

– Cross-over between academic life of College and the City

– Mixed-use project, incorporating student residential accommodation, academic teaching spaces, communal social spaces, retail and NHS health centre

– Working with multi-headed client, funders and council

– New build and refurbishment of historic college spaces

– Ground source heat pump and solar panels providing 40% on-site energy generation

The fourth quad open to social gathering and events
Flexible student bedroom

Princeton University, New Jersey, USA

Iterative testing for student living across dispersed sites

Client: Princeton University

Dates: August 2024 to May 2026

Scope: Site selection, site planning, concept design

Relevance

– Site selection for a new-build student accommodation development

– Testing capacity of a range of sites

– Multi-headed stakeholder organisations convened by design team

– Aligning values at the outset of the project through a collaborative visioning session

– Engaging with layered governance from Trustees to day-to-day operatives

– Highly constrained sites with environmental considerations ranging from floodplains to contaminated land

– Testing all sites for renewable energy potential through geoexchange wells and photovoltaics

– Integration of operations and accommodation

Interactive design workshop at MICA’s Camden office
Regenerative design for successful communities

Wellington College, Berkshire

Sensitive integration of education in a woodland setting

Client: Wellington College

Dates: 2014 - ongoing

Masterplan

Sixth Form Centre

Well-being Centre

Woodland Quad

Infrastructure + site wide improvements

Scope: Masterplanner, Lead Consultant + Designer, De-carbonisation Strategy, Interior Design, Landscape, RIBA 0-7

Relevance

– A new gatehouse for the College facilitates outreach and access, and makes Jesus more accessible both physically and virtually

– Cross-over between academic life of College and the City

– Mixed-use project, incorporating student residential accommodation, academic teaching spaces, communal social spaces, retail and NHS health centre

– Working with multi-headed client, funders and council

– New build and refurbishment of historic college spaces

– Ground source heat pump and solar panels providing 40% on-site energy generation

Wellington Masterplan
Student bedroom with views to the woodland Elizabeth Boarding House

The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn

Holistic review of estates allocation of space an environmental improvements

Client: The Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn

Dates: Old Hall 2016, Great Hall 2018, Extension completion 2019, Access Review ongoing

Scope: Masterplanner, Architectural Services RIBA 0-7, Lead Designer, Contract Administrator, Heritage and Conservation, Management, Detail planning and Listed building consents, conservation plan, revenue generation, De-carbonisation Strategy

Relevance

– Complex logistics on a constrained site

– Additional reader space, storage and office while preserving existing archives and historic interiors

– Transformative masterplan

– Low energy and low carbon strategies

– 60% expansion of library space for London’s oldest working Library

– New archive for historic documents, artefacts and artwork to BS 4971:2017 & BS EN 16893:2018

– Significant improvements to quality of spaces and accessibility

Section illustration of Collegiate estate renewable energy strategy
Development at Lincoln’s Inn intensifies use of existing building stock, East Terrace reinstated after construction and planting used to embed within sensitive setting

Project Agora, Gonville & Caius Cambridge

Retaining commercial income while doubling the accommodation capacity of a city centre asset

Client: Gonville and Caius College Cambridge

Dates: 2024 - 2025

Scope: Masterplanning, stakeholder engagement, energy masterplan, cost modelling, phasing scenarios, commercial viability

Relevance

– Integration with existing College facilities in a non-contiguous site

– A fully net zero development with internal ambient loop for district heating and cooling

– Existing building frame re-use for reduced embodied carbon and improved site logistics in highly constrained city-centre site

– Engagement with whole college community and fundraising efforts through alumni engagement and early communications

– Alignment of approach with wider College vision

Proposed visual across raised internal court with views towards King’s Chapel

Holborn Links Masterplan, London

Mixed-use area regeneration

Client: Triangle Property 2015

Edmond de Rothschild and Tristan Capital Partners 2017–2019

Dates: 2018 - 2021

Norfolk House 2020 - 2023

Scope: Masterplanner, Lead Architect RIBA 0-2

Masterplanning, Architecture Space Planning

Relevance

– Strategic review of historic estate with a varied mix of building types

– High quality co-working environments

– Improved entrances

– Mixed-use project, incorporating retail and commercial uses

– Stair core and new lifts in existing buildings

– Open, flexible office plates

– Meetings with Camden Planning and wider stakeholder consultation.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.