MICA Wolfson Court Interview Presentation by MICA

April

Wolfson Court

Design Presentation

2024

A vibrant and high quality living & learning environment for St John’s and Lucy Cavendish.

Living in a Rich Landscape

The new community is housed in a collegiate cluster of ‘villas’ configured around courtyards, greens and an array of outdoor rooms. The result is a permeable and verdant landscape knitting together eight buildings across the large site. The largest increase on site is trees and biodiversity, with over 30% canopy coverage proposed. The site is unified by a central, sinuous path connecting from a lodge at Madingley Road to a lodge on Clarkson Road: this connects all buildings, entrances and links the three communal spaces, changing in character as it moves through the site.

Communal Living

The villas provide a rich variety of type and size of accommodation, providing apartments, flats and townhouses built on the principle of shared staircases, fostering community within the large campus. The broad range of accommodation is efficient, compact and effective, with step-free access throughout all types of accommodation and minimising long corridors in favour of generous communal lobbies and landings.

Comfort and Passivhaus

Our scheme is designed and tested to a Passivhaus standard: we prioritise internal comfort and sustainability. Orientation of bedrooms has been a key driver for our approach which we have iteratively tested for Passivhaus performance, whilst designing and orientating to avoid overheating.

Living & Learning

MICA’s contemporary villas are inspired by the large Arts & Crafts inspired houses, dominant in the West Cambridge Conservation Area. As with the best of these Edwardian houses, our designs are of high quality, carefully detailed and articulated, connected to landscape, enduring and, above all, joyous places to live.

Cities Streets

Paths Spaces Parts

Buildings

Parts

Experience

Cities Streets

Paths Spaces

Part 1 Introductions

Conceptual Approach Building Blocks Contextual Response Part 2 Planning Considerations Options Evaluation

Introductions

Stuart Cade Director Design lead

Jessie Turnbull

Senior Associate

Student living specialist

James Roach

Senior Associate Education specialist

Victoria Timberlake Associate Passivhaus designer

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Keble College, Oxford H B Allen Centre, Oxford Clive Booth Student Village, Oxford Brookes University Cheng Yu Tung Building, Jesus College

Large Scale Student Living

Clive Booth Student Village, Oxford Brookes

1035 Undergraduate rooms

Stowe School, Buckinghamshire 212 communal bedrooms

Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Cheng Yu Tung building, Jesus College Oxford 68 en-suite rooms

Cities

flats

College Oxford 73 en-suite rooms

Pembroke College, Oxford 77 graduate study bedrooms,

studio

Hands Building, Mansfield

113 study bedrooms 72 refurbishment rooms

Keble College, Oxford

A Skilled and Capable Team

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Project Director Stuart Cade Project Architect Jessie Turnbull Up to Stage 3B Lead Architect James Roach Consultant Planner Cambridge City Council Project Manager Ridge Project Board

PassivHaus designer Victoria Timberlake Support staff : graphics, BIM manager, presentation, model making Architectural Assistant Architectural Assistant Consultant Consultant St John’s College

College

Lucy Cavendish

A Skilled and Capable Team

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Project Director Stuart Cade Project Architect Jessie Turnbull Stage 4 onwards Lead Architect James Roach Novated team Support staff : graphics, BIM manager, presentation, model making Architectural Assistant Main Contractor

PassivHaus designer Victoria Timberlake Project Manager Ridge Architectural Assistant Architectural Assistant Consultant Consultant Consultant St John’s College Lucy Cavendish College Project Board

Collaborative Approach

Applying our HE research to develop sustainable proposals

Presentation models made in house

3D printed model elements allow discussion of complex connections

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Plan Plan Plan Elevation Shelf Elevation Desk Elevation Elevation Elevation Wardrobe Size W. 900mm H. 2200mm (Varies) D. 600mm Full height maximised storage Open or closed shelving Safety mirror back of door Handles: concealed or not Materials: laminate or natural wood veneer Desk Shelving Shelves Size W. 1500mm H. 410mm D. 310mm Desk Size W. 1500mm (Varies) H. 710mm D. 700mm Standalone or fixed wardrobe Materials: laminate or natural wood veneer. Lino inserts for durability Integrated or loose file cabinet Fixed lighting under shelf or anglepoise. Bedside Table Size W. 440mm H. 450mm D. 440mm Wall mounted, integrated power for phones and devices Single Bed Size W. 900mm (3’0”) L. 2000mm (6’3”) Mattress size Cabinbed with storage impact on height. Headboard: fixed or wall mounted MICA Plan Plan Plan Plan Elevation Shelf Elevation Desk Elevation Elevation Elevation Wardrobe Size W. 900mm H. 2200mm (Varies) D. 600mm Full height maximised storage Open or closed shelving Safety mirror back of door Handles: concealed or not Materials: laminate or natural wood Desk Shelving Shelves Size W. 1500mm H. 410mm D. 310mm Desk Size W. 1500mm (Varies) H. 710mm D. 700mm Standalone or fixed wardrobe Materials: laminate or natural wood veneer. Lino inserts for durability Integrated or loose file cabinet Fixed lighting under shelf or anglepoise. Bedside Table Size W. 440mm H. 450mm D. 440mm Wall mounted, integrated power for phones and devices Single Bed Size W. 900mm (3’0”) L. 2000mm (6’3”) Mattress size Cabinbed with storage impact on height. Headboard: fixed or wall mounted Considerations for a typical Boarding House brief A toolkit for for preparing a project brief and schedule of accommodation December 2019

Part 1 Concept

Building Blocks

Contextual Response

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Concept Building Blocks

Contextual Response

Bucolic Setting

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Concept

Woodland Quad, Wellington College Hands Building, Mansfield College, Oxford

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Concept

Inside Out, Outside In

Inside Out Outside In

West House, Stowe School

Familiar Residential Scale

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Hands Building, Mansfield College Queens and Stanhope Boarding House, Stowe School

Collective Facilities: creating a sense of community

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Concept

Tower Room, Jesus College Weston Studio, Rambert School

Optimising Building Performance

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Concept

Chester Balmore, the largest certified Passivhaus multi-dwelling development in the UK upon completion

winter sun summer sun Compact and considered form to improve efficiency Integrated vertical and horizontal solar shading to mitigate against overheating. Tailored to each facade Chimneys to offer intake and extract ventilation as well as provide stack effect for purge ventilation Continuous line of insulation for the full structure, designing out risk of cold-bridging Continuous airtight line to aid thermal efficiency Materials chosen to reduce embodied carbon High-performance triple glazed windows - size and configuration to offer maximum benefit and comfort levels Thermally separated shading for larger ground floor glazing incorporating planting Opportunities for GSHP array to maximise on-site renewables Kitchens and bathrooms to incorporate low flow and low energy fittings Green roofs incorporated into roofscape to maximise UGF

Peking University Business School, Oxford

Concept Building Blocks

Contextual Response

Building Blocks: the study bedroom

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Building Blocks Windows arranged to provide optimum daylighting to the rooms Views out Task Lighting Corridor Study Bedroom Up-lighting to soffit to create even illumination to room Integrated shutter Window seat Down Lighting in lowered soffit for entrance and changing Zone for mechanical ventilation for room / ensuite Windows on landings and at end of corridors for natural lighting, views and ventilation Deep mullions provide passive solar shading Space optimised for variety of uses Natural materials Large shower tray Large timber desk with pinboard above and drawers below Recess for curtains Deep set operable window (central pivot to increase area) 3/4 Size bed with storage drawers below Series of bookshelves with integrated soft lighting Riser access from corridor Wide door with room number and notice board in timber panelling Timber wardrobe. Hangers and shelves / drawers. Cupboard for suitcase above Dressing Area En-Suite Shower Room Recessed bookshelf Lounge chair adjacent to book shelf Generous floor area to offer user flexibility Timber window seat with soft cushion pad and storage drawers below Timber shutters to windows Fixed picture window with central mullion

Building Blocks: the study bedroom

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Cross-ventilation Corridor Study Bedroom Shutters and curtains for internal supplementary shading Thermal breaks for cold-bridge free design Down Lighting in lowered soffit for entrance and changing Zone for mechanical ventilation for room / ensuite Windows on landings and at end of corridors to allow for cross ventilation for purge Shading tailored to facade orientation to avoid overheating Small electric radiatorminimal energy usage Natural materials Windows set back within insulation zone to minimise risk of cold-bridge Highly insulated and airtight structure with considered embodied carbon

SC Building Model - Test 02 Annual Heat Demand Treated Floor Area (TFA) Heat Loss Form Factor Thermal Envelope Area Number of Windows Case Study Demo (Kranichstein, Germany) Annual Heat Demand Treated Floor Area (TFA) Heat Loss Form Factor Thermal Envelope Area Number of Window 9.3kWh/m²a 1504sqm 1.22 1830 sqm 92 14.8kWh/m²a 155sqm 1.99 311 sqm 17 30deg Passive design: orientation and massing working with the site Building Blocks

Study Bedroom: a place for many ways of living

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Exercise Study

Building Blocks

Socialise

Study Bedroom

Narrower/ deeper room plan

3.15m wide x 5.7m long 15sqm area

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Wider room plan 3.45m wide x 4.45m 15sqm area

showing comparison of wider and narrower room grid on building facade length

Wider Rooms Narrower Rooms

~ 16m Facade length

Building Blocks

Diagram

Wolfson Court Bedroom

Building Blocks

Wolfson Court Bedroom

Building Blocks

Kitchens

kitchen

21m2 for 7 people

• Space for cooking, eating and relaxing

• Good levels of daylight

• Strong connectivity to the cluster and the wider community.

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Building Blocks

Typical

A Diversity of Types

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Townhouses Flats/ Maisonettes

Building Blocks L K GROUND GROUND FIRST FIRST TYPICAL FLOOR SECOND SECOND L K K, L, D K, L, D

6, 7, 8-bed Apartments

Concept Building Blocks

Contextual Response

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Contextual Response

Creating new campus environments

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts 4 storey equivalent frontage 5 storey equivalent frontage Gatehouse to Mathematics Height opportunity Height opportunity Residential property line, privacy required Assume bedrooms: mitigate overlooking Assume bedrooms: mitigate overlooking St John’s School avoid overlooking minors School MUGAavoid overlooking Allotment Potential for biodiversity corridor Set back massing and/or screen with trees Set back massing Counterpoint massing Entry gateway Corresponding entry Public footpath Potential to demolish 15A for enhanced gateway Option for Arts & Crafts villa as entry and social hub Existing tree cluster Challenge to create contiguous residential environemntal Existing tree screening positive to neighbours Link to Wilberforce Road accommodation Grade II Listed private home Link to St John’s College via playing fields Link to central Cambridge Link to University Library, Sidgewick Site and central Cambridge via Burrell’s Walk Primary link to Lucy Cavendish College Adams Road Bird Sanctuary Dense mixed woodlands Lucy Cavendish/habitat corridor Existing substation Existing substation RomanRoadCourse WCCA Character Area 1 WCCA Character Area 1 WCCA Character Area 2 MADINGLEY ROAD CLARKSONROAD GRANGE ROAD WCCA Character Area 2 Legend Tall building frontages Residential frontages School frontages Residential boundary Residential massing response School boundary School massing response Key route Potential habitat corridor Existing trees Possible demolition Whole site within West Cambridge Conservation Area: • Character Area 1 (Huntingdon Road to Madingley Road) • Character Area 2 (Grange Road) Planning Considerations

Continuing courtyard typology Communal Living Connection to landscape New routes across the site Inspired by local architectural styles Contextual response

Regenerative Design

Surface water management

Biodiversity across the site

Maximising renewable energy Green roofs, rainwater harvesting & water management

Management of natural assets

Landscape in the local context Passive design

Consideration to surface water management site-wide

GREEN WOLFSON COURT

Ongoing stewardship and management of natural assets

Protecting, enhancing and increasing biodiversity across the site

Improving opportunities for active travel

Opportunities for green roofs, rainwater harvesting and water management onsite

Conserving, enhancing and strengthening links with landscape and local context

Passive design: orientation and massing working with the site

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts 30deg

ADAMS ROAD BIRD SANCTUARY ST JOHNS COLLEGE PLAYING FIELDS BINBROOK LUCY CAVENDISH COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED MATHMATICS MADINGLEY ROAD GRANGE ROAD CHURCHILL COLLEGE CLARKSONROAD

flood

wider context EMMANUEL COLLEGE SPORTS GROUND WILBERFORCE ROAD

Ensuring resilience in water and

management in the

energy provision through solar / GSHP / ASHP systems TO NEW LUCY CAVENDISH COLLEGE STUDENT HOUSING

Maximising renewable

Contextual response

Responding to Context

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Contextual response

Plan Analysis

Streets

Paths

Cities

Buildings

Spaces Parts

Contextual response Circulation Garden Kitchen/living Accessible study bedroom Study bedroom

Primary Orientation

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Contextual response

N Circulation Garden Kitchen/living Accessible study bedroom Study bedroom

Extrapolating the Typology

Cities

Contextual response

Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Circulation Garden Kitchen/living

Accessible study bedroom

Study bedroom

Landscape Villas

Contextual response

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Garden Kitchen/living

study bedroom Study bedroom

Circulation

Accessible

Forming the Collective Identity

Contextual response

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Circulation Garden Kitchen/living Accessible study bedroom Study bedroom

Developing a Contemporary Typology

2000 1900 1570 PRELIMINARY KEY PLAN REVISIONS REV DATE STATUS

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Contextual response Circulation Garden Kitchen/living Accessible study bedroom Study bedroom

A Landscape Vision

Contextual response 1 2 4 4 3 5 5 5 2 6 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 11 11 10 8 1 6 8 2 3 Grass Quad A traditionally styled grass court with a perimeter path as setting for the existing specimen trees Private Garden Access is through single gates and where the views are kept within the garden Public Garden A new public realm for the community with shaded picnic areas and play space Clarkson Drive A welcoming landscape addressing those arriving from St John’s College and Burrell’s Walk Social Terrace A hard-landscaped area that interacts with the social spaces Madingley Drive A hard-landscaped area that interacts with the social spaces of the academic buildings and welcomes students, staff and visitors into the space. Study Garden A series of contemplative garden rooms with seating for study groups Rain Garden Hardy, water-loving plants in retention basins that manage stormwater and provide water habitats Orchard Field A productive landscape with a variety of native fruit trees Mews Yard A hard landscaped, shaded space for social and study gatherings Bog Garden In an already shaded garden there is an opportunity to create a bog garden with native species Planted Walk A pedestrian spine linking the site together with high biodiverse planting

Existing Proposed Contextual response

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Biodiversity Corridor

Villas in Gardens

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Informal

courtyard character

Porous, Transparent, Vibrant depth

The buildings are porous and offer a degree of transparency to reveal their depth, particularly at ground floor, to create an inviting prospect, and allowing unexpected pathways through and between buildings. The villas are approachable, intuitive, interesting and elegant, with a glow that invites guests and residents in.

Community

Beyond this, we have suggested a rich mix of student social spaces (both indoor and outdoor) that would create and support a thriving community within the Northwest Cambridge Conservation Area, ranging from generous student kitchens, to the belvedere community space within the back garden of 15 Madingley Road, complemented by social outdoor terraces related to the common rooms, and outdoor play and study areas integrated into the hedged gardens and yards.

These give space for students to unwind from their daily routine, and encourage a wider population to visit. Physical activity can be encouraged through an indoor gym and outdoor equipment that can be used by children and adults alike: play bars functioning as pull-up bars, and mushrooms that are the ideal step-up, warm up location before a jog on the walking path.

Broad interaction: a range of moments

Pathways are designed as social spaces that invite footfall, and are safe, healthy, accessible, inviting, active, and well-lit. We will ensure frequent entrances and active frontages with windows and balconies that overlook the pathways and gardens, encouraging neighbourly engagement and increasing passive surveillance.

The series of moments that offer opportunity for interaction range from the first time the sight site is seen, to the arrival points (arriving by foot, parking your bike), to moving towards the building and coming into the loggia shelter of the Lodges at either end of the site, where again you might pause and interact, to the internal circulation spaces which prioritise the stairs to promote healthy lifestyle and encourage interaction. These spaces are naturally lit and offer moments to pause and interact, take in views of the surrounding landscape and context, and to spontaneously meet fellow students and colleagues, continuing a conversation or catching up.

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Gatehouse

Belvedere

Contextual response 3 2

Contextual response 3 4

Courtyard

4 5 Contextual response

Common Room

Contextual response 5 6

Lodge

Contextual response

Elevation Bay Study

September

Chimney elements for efficient extract from MVHR system

Pitched roof to upper floor

Dormer windows to study bedrooms

Projecting framing to study bedrooms to provide suitable solar shading

Ground floor set back to provide shading from over sailing upper storey

Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Cities Streets

Contextual response

Shading illustrated for 10 am on 1st A rich palette of clay based materials

Elevation Bay Study

Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Soldier course brickwork Material studies Option 3

Cities

Red brick Zinc roof Option 2 Clay tiles Red brick Soldier course brickwork Option 1 Clay tiles Clay tiles Red brick GRC framing Zinc gutter Painted steel projecting frames Brick work with different bonds Tiled wall with framed windows Zinc roof Projecting window surrounds Contextual response

Refined and robust material palette appropriate for the setting

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Materials

Options Evaluation

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Part 2 Planning Considerations

Part 2

Planning Considerations

Options Evaluation

Planning Considerations

Wolfson Court is an incredible opportunity to improve the student living in the suburban heart of West Cambridge. The possibilities of this site significantly outweigh the risks, and those that we have identified below have readily achievable solutions and mitigations to be worked through with the College clients and Local Authority.

We have reviewed the current local plan, appraised local and relevant nearby development of student accommodation and evaluated the key planning risks that are pertinent to the Wolfson Court redevelopment as follows:

• Demolition: the existing Wolfson Court is not recognised as a positive building in Conservation Area Appraisal (albeit the appraisal is over 12 years old). We believe we could make the case for the demolition through carefully analysing the embodied carbon of a proposed new-build, evaluating the difference in operational carbon between existing and proposed, and demonstrating the improvement to the Whole Life Cycle Carbon Assessment, while reclaiming all viable materials for re-use on site.

• Water: we have shown on the following slides how water can be conserved on site allowing the development to be water-neutral, easing the pressure on the fragile water infrastructure of East Anglia, while increasing the density of the site. Our calculations show the difference between assumed existing water usage, regulation compliant and best practice, while demonstrating the benefits of offsetting water use with harvested rainwater.

• Building heights: we understand staying within the three storey building plus roof or attic rooms with dormers is likely to be the safe and acceptable massing. Anything higher will attract much scrutiny. Could make case for higher buildings in the centre of the site, and against the Maths side (respecting trees)

• Public amenities: show we are giving something back to the community, the city e.g. improve the bike path alongside Maths, public recreation space, and re-providing (and possibly even increasing capacity of) the nursery

• Access: all parts of all buildings should be accessible and include lifts (not just common spaces and accessible rooms)

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Key Parameters: Existing

Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Cities

144 1,088 20.4 62 0.34 27 Planning Considerations Existing baseline ROOMS TREES U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m2/a)

Key Parameters: Proposed

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Planning Considerations 396 452 19.0 183 0.41 27 Existing baseline ROOMS TREES U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m2/a)

Design Quality: Increased Porosity

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Design Quality

Rooms: Building Heights

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Planning Considerations

15 Madingley Road

Maths Proposed Wolfson Court Proposed Wolfson Court St John’s College School Clarkson Road

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Trees

Urban Greening Factor

Proposed: 0.41

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Planning Considerations

Semi-natural Vegetation Proposed Existing Standard trees (in conntected pits) Wetlands and Open Water Flower-Rich Perennials Groundcover Planting Amenity Grassland Extensive Green Roof (Sedum) Permeable Paving Rain Gardens (vegetated sustainable drainage) Sealed Surfaces Hedges Semi-natural Vegetation Proposed Existing Standard trees (in conntected pits) Wetlands and Open Water Flower-Rich Perennials Groundcover Planting Amenity Grassland Extensive Green Roof (Sedum) Permeable Paving Rain Gardens (vegetated sustainable drainage) Sealed Surfaces Hedges Existing Proposed

Biodiversity

Varied natural habitats

Seasonal planting

Connecting into the existing landscape

Enclosed Courts with rich planting

Woodland glade

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Planning Considerations

CO2: Demolition

Analyse existing structure

Calculate embodied carbon

Assess feasibility of retrofit

Investigate options for recycling

Interrogate resultant energy use

Calculate whole life carbon

Planning Considerations Recycling of building fabric in construction

Low-embodied Carbon Reduction

Timber frame with load bearing masonry walls

Embodied carbon

Engineered timber frame (CLT slabs / walls and Glulam columns / beams

Timber frame with load-bearing stone walls

Embodied carbon

Operational carbon

Adaptability to Passivhaus performance

Ease of maintenance and durability

Adaptability to Passivhaus performance

Ease of maintenance and durability

Adaptability to Passivhaus performance

Ease of maintenance and durability

Cities Streets Buildings

Paths Spaces Parts

Planning Considerations

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Water 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 100 0 200 300 400 Litres per day Rooms on site EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED (HARVESTING) 0 Typical water usage for one person 142 litres/day Toilet (13l/tank no dual flush) Shower (5 minutes, standard head) Hand washing Dishes Laundry LETI guidance water usage for one person 75 litres/day Toilet (6l/tank, dual flush) 5 minute shower, low flow head Drinking/cooking (3l) Drinking/cooking (3l) Laundry (AAA rated appliance) Dishes (AAA rated appliance) Hand-washing (aerated tap, auto-shutoff) LETI guidance water usage for one person 45 litres/day Toilet (6l/tank, dual flush using harvested rainwater) 5 minute shower, low flow head Drinking/cooking (3l) Laundry (AAA rated appliance) Dishes (AAA rated appliance) Hand-washing (aerated tap, auto-shutoff) Traffic runoff resilient swale integrated with incidental play Continuous swale alongside improved cycle path Bioretention pond in low lying area Rill/swale alongside primary footpath Rain garden in sheltered court 1 5 2 4 3 Typical water usage for one person 142 litres / day LETI water usage for one person 75 litres / day LETI water usage for one person 45 litres / day Planning Considerations

Public Benefit

Giving back to the community

Improved, widened shared cycle and footpath

Enhanced woodland glade

Expanded nursery

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

500m2 enhanced woodland glade

Improved footpath Expanded public nursery for 160 children in bucolic suburban setting 1 2 3 Planning Considerations

Access

All parts of every building are accessible with lifts

Inclusive for both visible and non-visible disabilities

Moving comfortably

Designing for neurodiversity

Enabling choice

Following PAS 6463

Accessible study bedrooms dotted around the site on all floors

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts

Planning Considerations

Options Evaluation

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts Part

Range of Options for Evaluation

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts 392 18.8 180 0.41 12 ROOMS TREES U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) 12 337 425 392 491 16.2 20.4 198 168 0.42 0.40 12 12 Existing baseline ROOMS ROOMS TREES TREES U.G.F. U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) WATER (kL/day) PARKING PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) 456

Passivhaus Mews Courtyard Villas

Range of Options for Evaluation

Cities Streets Buildings Paths Spaces Parts 420 20.2 150 0.39 12 ROOMS TREES U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) 12 C W B ED W Bd D B y (COURSEOF)ROMANROAD P a h 1 5m c N w o Ma hem a S ce 5 7 4 s u e 1 3 4 4 6 t61 93 7 1 G e a a dge S o n s C ege Schoo 83 M Be a G do 21 5 CLAR SON ROAD C O C K C R O F T P L A C E C L A R K S O S E EN ANS COURT C W B ED W E Bdy (COURSEOF)ROMANROAD 12 m s N w on 6 6 Ma ema S e es 5 1 7 1 o 1 3 4 7 41 6 61 o 7 11 P k n G hou kes G m 20 P C n Ma hema a Sc enc s Un ve s y o Camb d e S ohn Co e e S h o M b Go n 8 2 51 CLARKSON ROAD C O C E C L A R K S O N C L O S B N ANS COURT MAD NGLEY ROAD S0 PRELIMINARY REV DATE DESCRIPTION DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. CONTRACTOR TO CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. ANY DISCREPANCIES TO BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. COPYRIGHT MICA ARCHITECTS LTD © 123 Camden High Street London NW1 7JR T: 020 7284 1727 020 7267 7826 info@micaarchitects.com www.micaarchitects.com A1 500 Wolfson Court Site Plan - Ground JT SC 251-24-005-MICA-ZZ-01-DR-A-12005 00-MP-A-001_WholeSite 1 CR W d Bd ED W ED Bdy (COURSEOF)ROMANROAD P h m sa e n M ma S e s 1 o 8 o 4 6 93 7 18 1 av E F es e a e F Ge e y 0 Pa o F Cen e o Ma hem a Sc e ces Un v s o Cambr dge S J h Co eg S hoo 3 M e B a b 8 21 5 C ARK ON ROAD C O C K C R O F T P L C L A R K S O E BEN A S COURT M D NG E ROAD PRELIMINARY REV DO CONTRACTOR ANY ARCHITECT COPYRIGHT 123 info@micaarchitects.com Wolfson Site SC 251 00-MP-A-001_WholeSite 1 KEEP NURSERY MAXIMUM CAPACITY MOVE NURSERY 391 395 446 450 18.8 19.0 168 175 0.39 0.41 12 12 Existing baseline ROOMS ROOMS TREES TREES U.G.F. U.G.F. WATER (kL/day) WATER (kL/day) PARKING PARKING OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) OP. ENERGY (MWh/m /a) 479

Nursery

Potential Expansion

We bring expertise in all areas of education design, including a considerable body of high quality nursery design. While schematically shown, the proposed new nursery offers the opportunity to increase the capacity of children, while occupying a largely similar area to the existing nursery. We believe the proposed nursery can be housed in an ideal courtyard setting, offering every room direct access to outdoor play space, and an optimal balance of baby, toddler and pre-school space for up to 120-140 children over two floors in alignment with current Ofsted and EYFS Framework guidelines.