munster high school 8808 columbia ave. munster, indiana 46321
http://mhsnews.net
crier
january 27, 2023 volume 59 issue 6
munster high school
reena alsakaji & josephine mittelberger
editor-in-chief & design chief
C
alculating the score of the essay generated by ChatGPT, Mr. Steven Stepnoski, English teacher, mutters, ‘That can’t be right.’ Punching in the numbers into the calculator once again, he sighs in defeat as he writes “88.” As an experiment alongside our ChatGPT coverage, Crier gave Mr. Stepnoski two essays to grade: one was written by Josephine Mittelberger, senior, and the other was generated by ChatGPT based on her essay. There was a 10% difference, and Mr. Stepnoski noted that the essay did not flow. While the ideas connected logically, the sentence structure and word choice lacked voice and style. “Spotting the writing style differences would be a lot more challenging to do without knowing someone’s writing voice or style previously,” Mr. Stepnoski said. “It got repetitive, and that’s where my antenna went up: this sort of seems like an automated, voiceless style of writing.” While creating the essay with ChatGPT, Crier found that, if not given the information about the essay topic, the AI system was not accurate. Students such as Stephen Glombicki and teachers such as Mrs. Brook Lemon found this same issue—the program would confidently spill out false information when asked about specifics in books or questions in regards to math.
Homework turned automated
“Chat GPT, print my essay on...”
“It thinks like a human.” “It’s able to consume so much information at once. It does not write like a human, but I feel like it thinks closer to humans than most other things would,” Anthony Bellahcen, senior, said. Since ChatGPT’s release in November, several school districts have rushed to block the program, according to the New York Times, claiming that it hinders student creativity. Currently, students cannot access any OpenAI program on their school laptops, both in the building and outside of it. According to a Crier survey of 218 responses, from Jan. 12-23, approximately 12% of students have used ChatGPT or another AI for an academic subject, and 37% of students know others do so. Sarah Espiritu, senior, finds the program conflicts with her values as she plans to become an English teacher in the future. “So long as AI keeps advancing to know what professors want in papers, students are never going to learn how to be their own writer and have a voice. It’s just going to be the same—confined to a box,” Sarah said. “ Personally, but as a future educator, all I can do is encourage students to want to learn—not to just give them a deadline, or say you have to submit this because of the curriculum. I’m giving you a deadline because I want to instill a want to learn of the subject.”
“There is an inherent value in the struggle.” The overarching concern of teachers with ChatGPT is that rather than using it as a tool for learning, students will instead use it in moments of desperation when the deadline is too close to finish the work on
COPY AND PASTE Printing out a mock essay from ChatGPT, Gaby Ruiz, senior, poses for a photo. Since ChatGPT’s release, school districts have feared that students will utilize this resource for plagiarism. (photo illustration by marianna young & reena alsakaji)
Following ChatGPT’s release in November, students and teachers discuss its implications for education and student creativity, as well as other AI their own. Mr. Benjamin Boruff, English teacher, found that ChatGPT and other AI generating programs challenge teachers to encourage their students to learn how to struggle. “It just makes it all the easier for someone to not learn and grow as a writer,” Mr. Boruff said. “I think this will be an issue moving forward in English classes everywhere, but learning will still happen. It’s hard to do, but to convince folks that there is an inherent value in going through the struggle to get to the end result. The more people I can convince of that, the less likely they’ll rely on something like this.” While there are sources out there that can potentially detect if an essay was created by ChatGPT, because there is no guarantee that an essay was created with an AI system, it would be difficult to accuse a
student of cheating. Mrs. Brook Lemon, English teacher, compared this to accusing a parent of writing their child’s essay—unless a child says it, there is no way to prove that theory. “I think it’s a really good point that teachers need to make sure they know their students and know what they’re capable of,” Mrs. Lemon said. “This shouldn’t be the first time they’re seeing their writing. They should know what their writing is like, but sometimes you just never can pick it out.” Programs such as ChatZero have stated that they can detect plagiarism by ChatGPT. Increasingly, students have found their way around these issues. Students reported using the program for both essays and other extracurriculars, such as Science Olympiad and Debate.
A look into the essay Crier gave Mr. Steven Stepnoski, english teacher, two sample essays. Below is one sentence written by one of our staff members, and the other is written by ChatGPT. Guess which one is which (answers on page 6.) 1. “This line serves as an introduction to the theme of the song, which is about the lengths that one might go to in order to eliminate perceived competition in a romantic relationship.” 2. “He follows the line by directly addressing the audience, the man he is in love with, which confirms the aggressive tone that was established in the narration.”
continued on page 6.