Volume 44 issue 9

Page 1

THE VOICE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MISSISSAUGA

November 6, 2017 Volume 44, Issue 9 themedium.ca

Back to bargaining table

Let’s talk about assault again

Cory Doran and spelling bees

Dennis Edney shares his story

Importance of communication

News, page 2

Opinion, page 4

Arts, page 5

Features, page 8

Sports, page 11

AGM fails to remove executive positions UTSU members rejected combining VP external and VP university Affairs into VP advocacy position ALICIA BOATTO NEWS EDITOR

The removal of vice-president external and vice-president university affairs was rejected at the University of Toronto Students’ Union’s Annual General Meeting in a vote of 196 students against the bylaw amendment. REMOVING UTSU EXECUTIVE POSITIONS UTSU president Mathias Memmel sought to eradicate the two vicepresident positions and combine their duties into a new executive role, VP advocacy, to reduce union spending as each executive receives a yearly salary. According to Memmel, the UTSU is currently running a deficit and needs to reduce its spending. He emphasized that if the UTSU has a consistent deficit for seven years, the university administration can reclaim occupation of the student commons building. The UTSU whether you believe it or not is in financial crisis,” said current VP Internal Daman Singh.

Memmel and Singh emphasized the need to cut UTSU spending. One student argued that the UTSU spends a large quantity on “self-serving expenses” and that the removal of executive positions would not create financial relief. “Do not talk about a culture of self-servitude and then get up here

and talk about keeping that we should keep a number of executive positions that we don’t need and that a number of other schools don’t have,” Singh said. Several students spoke out in opposition to the altering of the execu-

OLIVIA ADAMCZYK/THE MEDIUM

tive team including UTSU’s current VP external Anne Boucher and UTMSU’s president Salma Fakhry. “Over this past year, all I feel UTSU is doing is cutting and cutting and cutting. But are you really growing as a union? Are you including

these students in your decisions?” Fakhry questioned UTSU. The opposition’s main argument concerned the division of work for the new VP position. Boucher argued that her current position requires her to work over 45 hoursa-week, resulting in the completion of only half her workload. Boucher claimed that a VP advocacy would not be able to accomplish the necessary tasks of both VP external and university affairs. Students argued that the cutting of the two VP positions would not effectively reduce spending and would ultimately put students at a disadvantage by removing their representation to the administration and outside organizations. Daman Singh, UTSU’s current VP internal, argued that the union currently has the lowest salaries given to a student union but the most executive positions in the country. Singh also accused that opponents of the amendment wanted to keep the two executive positions to run in the 2018 UTSU elections. AGM continued on page 2

Science building recommendation passed UTM plans for a new science building by 2021 in order to increase research opportunities on campus SHARMEEN ABEDI STAFF WRITER

The Campus Affairs Committee meeting last week approved the recommendation for a new science building at UTM to be built behind the current William G. Davis Building. It is expected to be completed by the year 2021. UTM principal Ulrich Krull discussed that the creation of a science building has been a goal for about twenty years, and that plans had been drawn up in 2001, 2006, and 2009. Now in 2017, the recommendation of the project has been approved and is moving forward. “There is a tremendous amount of work that has already been done in terms of planning and discussion,” he stated. According to Krull, design, cost, and the necessity of the building have all been considered. The building is funded by UTM Capital Reserves, long-term borrowing, and donations or funds.

DANIELLE ROLFE/THE MEDIUM

The building is to be located in the space near the William G. Davis Building. It will be designed according to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, a green building certification program. LEED

is, although costly, more environmentally friendly which would help reduce UTM’s ecological footprint. Several of UTM’s current buildings

have followed LEED design, including the Instructional Building, Hazel McCallion Academic Learning Centre, the Health Sciences

Complex, Innovation Complex, and Deerfield Hall. “This is a historical moment in terms of UTM’s positioning because this building is a research building,” said Krull. He emphasised that this building will be primarily used for research purposes as opposed to traditional teaching facilities and lecture halls. There are currently only conceptual drawings of the building, which are designed to give an idea about the scale and the size of it. No architectural images are available yet. Krull stated that any new faculty for the building will not be hired until the building is complete. The hiring process will go simultaneously with the construction. After being approved for recommendation, the proposal for the new science building will move through governance levels until approved officially by the Governing Council at the St. George campus. Building continued on page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.