THE WEEK IN East Bristol & North East Somerset
16th March 2022
Issue 721
FREE
Read by more than 40,000 people each week
Power plant plan is refused but campaigners are braced for appeal Controversial plans for a “massive and ugly” anaerobic digester plant near Keynsham have been refused but it is suspected that the developer will appeal. Bath & North East Somerset Council’s planning committee unanimously rejected the scheme by Resourceful Energy Anaerobic Ltd (REAL) for Charlton Field Lane. REAL had applied to increase capacity from the previously approved 25,000 tonnes of organic materials or feedstocks per year to 92,000 tonnes, and to restore ecology in the old quarry at the site. REAL director Phil Gerrard told Wednesday’s meeting: “This project takes waste food and agricultural residues and turns them into clean, carbon-neutral renewable energy. It will significantly increase the district’s renewable energy capacity and help tackle the climate emergency declared by the council three years ago. Also in the light of the huge challenges we now face on energy security, it’s a very timely opportunity.” He claimed that the council planning officer’s report contained “misleading” and “significant inaccuracies”. Speaking on behalf of campaign group Protect Our Keynsham Environment (POKE), which represents 847 objectors, planning consultant Rob Duff said the application involved a large AD facility and the retention and regrading of approximately 250,000 tonnes of unauthorised and unmonitored land-raising to form a hill to screen the plant.
Also in this week’s issue
He added: “This is not previously developed or brownfield land, as the applicant would have you believe, but a greenfield site within beautiful open countryside that has been damaged by unauthorised built development and unauthorised land-raising. The site should have been restored years ago.” He added: “I have been a town planner for over 30 years and I’ve never before come across unauthorised development or proposed development as harmful to the Green Belt than the application before you. The AD facility is both massive and ugly but it’s dwarfed by the large hill.” Saltford councillor Alistair Singleton, in whose ward the site lies, is the council’s member advocate for renewable energy. He said he had been a supporter of the much smaller 2014 scheme, which was genuinely designed to convert food waste into green energy. He said the current application lacked integrity and was loaded in places with “weasel words”. “In reality food waste forms only a part of the mix of what is being proposed by REAL and where it will come from is not easy to ascertain. The B&NES food waste contract is committed to GENeco in Avonmouth for many years to come and suggestions that waste may be sourced and shipped in from neighbouring authorities such as South Glos or Wiltshire seem very fanciful and fraught with downsides such as HGV mileage, road congestion and diesel
Crime concerns over possible location of Cadbury Heath park . . . page 4
Latest efforts to help Ukraine . . . page 6
The site at Charlton Field Lane
emissions.” Cllr Singleton added that a third of the plant’s operating emissions are expected to be methane, a significantly more damaging greenhouse gas than CO2, and the considerable emissions generated by the scheme’s construction would take years to pay back in operation. “This is not a green or environmentally sound project. It is a damaging commercial enterprise masquerading in diaphanous green clothing. It is opposed by all the local town and parish councils.” Cllr Alan Hale warned that many hundreds of homes in his Keynsham South ward would be affected directly by the inappropriate development and “28,000 additional HGV journeys per year on inappropriate roads”. Continued on page 3
Tackling congestion in Longwell Green . . . page 7
Share your memories of Chasers nightclub with museum . . . page 9