C anada
gets high
| 16
M en ' s S occer V ictorious
12 3 VOLUME
T *H *E
T
u e s d a y
, 3
O
20
ISSUE
c t o b e r
5
2000
M c G IL L T R IB U N E Published by the Students' Society of M cGill University
O N LIN E http://tribune.mcgill.ca
Martlets retain top ranking By A ndrew Raven_____________ If soccer can be said to have an u g ly side, the C o n co rd ia Stingers sure know how to bring it out. For 90 minutes they played ten back and attempted to smother the M cG ill attack, not concerning themselves with certain nuances of the game like scoring. The strategy almost worked to perfection as M c G ill dominated the game of possession but could not put the ball past C oncordia keeper M ic h e lle S u tc liffe . It wasn’t until the 74th minute that M c G ill opened the scoring on a long shot from midfielder Sophie Labrom that would prove the lone marker in a gutsy 1-0 victory for the Martlets. The w in improved M c G ill’ s record to 5-0 in league play and opened their lead over the second place Stingers to 6 points. It was the type of game that put the fans in attendance to sleep and left coach M arc M o u n ic o t wanting. "For the third game in a row the team was co m in g to M cG ill and playing ten at the back. They closed the space and it was ve ry, very d ifficu lt to generate chances and score. When we didn’t score early we gave some confi dence to the other team because they stayed back and it was 0-0 for a long time. M c G ill m issed three good chances in the opening minutes as Alana Maloney and Am ber Allen fired w ide from in close and a Sophie La b rom deflection on a free kick sailed just over the bar. From that point on M c G ill was unable to pierce the C oncordia defense which bottled up the mid dle and was content to let the Martlets work on the perimeter. M c G ill fo rw ard M aite Creixell echoed the sentiments of her coach. "It’s difficult to play against
Continued on Page 24
In Monreal and around the country, Canadianspay their respects to the late Rt. Honourable Pierre Elliott Trudeau, (see page 6 for McGill perspectives)
Patrick Fok
Service em ployees7strike looms over campus By Shehryar Fazli One of these days, M cG ill stu dents might find they have to fend entirely for themselves on campus, as years of failed negotiations between M cG ill University and the Service Em p lo ye e s ’ U n io n has finally resulted in an overwhelming majority vote from the Union in favour of a University-wide strike. Since 1996 the Union, whose m embers include porters, staff from residences, cafeterias, clean ing and the mailroom, has been in negotiations w ith M c G ill over workers’ rights, encompassing job security, salaries and time off. Over this time, the Union has expressed extrem e discontent w ith the U n iv e rs ity about its treatment towards workers. Lack of a satis factory response resulted in a 94 per cent vote from the U n io n ’ s members in support o f a strike mandate at their general meeting
on September 23. The Union expects the M cG ill U n iv e rs ity N o n -A c a d e m ic Certified Association (M U N A C A ), which represents technical staff, clerical staff and library assistants, to rally behind it in the event of a strike, leaving M cG ill with the pos sibility of over 1500 of its employ ees not showing up to work. This would effectively halt the operation of many key locations on campus in c lu d in g , am ong others, re si dences, cafeterias and porters’ offices. Th e situation indicates a time of unusually strained relations between M cG ill and its workers. “ I ’ ve been at the University for 25 years, and over that time I have always been involved in the Union movement, and I ’ve never seen such a strong mandate in my life ,” said M ichael Y akobina, a porter in the Rutherford physics and Wong buildings, and president of the Service Employees’ Union.
At issue The issue of job security has been an area of serious disagree ment between the University and the Union. According to Yakobina, the U n ive rs ity wants to cut the level of job security available to all full-tim e employees from 85 per cent down to 75 per cent, meaning that an additional ten per cent of all full-time employees will no longer have job security. Employees without job securi ty are either employed on a casual basis by the University in the event of an increase in the demand for labour, or serve as substitutes for w orkers on leaves of absence. These workers are therefore uncer tain about the number of hours they w ill be em ployed in any given month. There is no minimum set for the number of hours a casual worker must work, and therefore an employee without job security
may find himself without work for weeks at a time. However, Robert Savoie, executive director at the Department of Human Resources, believes that such a situation is possible in theory, but does not occur in practice. “I have never seen such a case yet,” he says. For the work casual employees do get assigned, they are paid only 70 per cent of what normal workers are paid for the same labour. T h e U n io n feels that the University has not satisfactorily explained why they need to bring the percentage of employees with out job security up to twenty-five per cent. “Fifteen per cent [of employ ees] do not [currently] have job s e c u rity ,” explains Y a k o b in a , “M cG ill does not have an explana tion for this [change in p olicy]...
Continued on Page 2
|
The McGill Bookstore invites you to a Book Launch
'Designing Women' Gender and the Architectural Profession _______ .
Thursday, O ctober 5,h 2000 5:30pm — 2nd floor Café
.... _ WÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊÊ
by Annmarte Adams and Peta Tancred
llllittti
McGi , ■____
BOOKSTORE 3420 McTavish •398 7444