

Is the role of a business partner that controllers are aspiring to only a “wishful thinking”, or real support for managerial decisions?
DR INŻ. JERZY SZKWAREK
Companies’ external surrounding
Companies’ internal perspective
Change of competition paradigm
Companies’ strategic goals (company – market)
New approach to operational controlling
Three-dimentional model of measuring conceptions
Functional and process dimentions Financial dimention
Synchronization of strategy tactics and operations
Integrated model of value chain Conclusion Summary
Economic cycles have been distorted
Emotions govern market participants’ behavior which leads to deflections
Strategies of balancing require companies to be able to quickly adjust to changes (adaptation)
The Internet and new communication technologies radically change reality
Constant pressure to reduce price and increasing „commoditization” have beome reality
Wikinomy supplants economy (Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple)
Logistic networks support traditional formulas of supply chains
Consumer:
Consumer has transformed into Prosument
Quality and time play a crucial role selling transactions
Customer is expecting still more for less
New relation C2B is emerging – the business is „socialized”
Traditional methods of reducing operational costs have already almost been depleted.That is why enhancing effectivity in the range of whole supply chains may be a considerable source with high potential to gain competitive advantage.
It is necessary to look out for new managerial methods questioning established stereotypes (dynamic process management)
The natural conflict arising among sale, logistics and finances should be tapped into as a source of inspiration to creat innovative and strategic aims
Due to a wide range of application possibilities of the dynamic development of information technologies there is the need to change organization of carried out processes
Knowledge of real parameters concerning logistic processes makes it possible to improve efficiency in functioning whole supply networks
Companies looking for new opportunities for new operations must carry out simultaneously conflicting short and long term aims. (Lean Management and Agile Management)
- Production according to forecast
- Central stock management
- Looking for advantages resulting from the scale effect
- Production to order
- Using quick response to demand (QR)
- constatnt replenishment conception (CR)
Technological advancement triggers the effect of „mass individualization”
We observe two phenomenons in supply chain analysis:
Common price pressure,
Profit concentration in one link of value chain
Development of supply networks requires new paradigm of competition and new understanding of competitiveness. We can apply here, for example:
conception of firm strategies referring to positioning and adjustement
modual approach
theory of value migration
conception of profit model
Number of unprofitable sectors is rising- neither large share in market, nor operations in a rapidly increasing sector guarantee high profitability
Success and reached profitability are the award for creating a new, innovative model of company activity
Ability to optimaly use the resources
Ability to define and realize appropriate goals
Poziom strategiczny
Strategic level
Operational level
Relation of the result to the costs of their achievement > 1
Transition from the seller market to the buyer market means a radical verification of the classical marketing conception 4P. It also introduces the new term „marketing logistics”, which is based on; quick response to needs, reliability of servicing and customer relations leading to the full satisfaction of the customer
Creating demand (marketing) as well as fulfilling its requirements (logistics) cannot be anymore perceived as separate functions, but as integrated by mechanisms tools for operating the supply chain oriented on the market.
FUNCTIONAL MEASURES OF THE EVALUATION OF VALUE CHAIN EFFECTIVENESS
MULTIDIMENTIONAL TOOLS OF THE EVALUATION OF VALUE CHAIN FINANCIAL EFFECTIVENESS
PROCESS MEASURES INTEGRATING THE EVALUATION OF VALUE CHAIN EFFECTIVENESS
Przychody
Koszty zakupu towarów handlowych
Poziom jakości obsługi klienta
Kapitał obrotowy
Koszty transportu
Koszty wielkości zamówienia Koszty magazynowania
Koszty systemów IT
Koszty zarządzania i sprzedaży
Przychody
Zysk netto Całkowity koszt
Koszty
Poziom jakości obsługi klienta
Kapitał obrotowy
Koszty pozyskania kapitału
Koszty transportu
Koszty wielkości zamówienia Koszty magazynowania
Koszty systemów IT
Koszty zarządzania i sprzedaży
Koszty zakupu towarów handlowych Zapas
Należności
Observations show that ERP systems designed to collect data about companies provide certain insight into the transactional side of company activity. Many users of such systems do not undertake further necessary actions and as a result they come up with plenty of data, but little knowledge.
The data provided by transactional systems may be analyzed with the help of analytic information tools and processed into knowledge. Many companies made the costly mistake and took it for granted that an appropriate ERP system will solve all problems.
Many companies struggle with intergration of all functioning „silos” of supply chain and putting them into one reporting and organizational structure – making an effort to find measures which would join all functions into a loosely connected whole. We can see everywhere companies using the same technics – planning, supply, logistics etc. – for all products and channels. However, it must be emphasized that this approach is wrong.
Increasing internal effectivity resulting from costs reduction is not a sufficient method of improving a company’s market position.
Prosument requires the company to constantly fulfil his growing requirements
Modern economic organizations should as a standard carry out the strategy „demand driven”
Market competitive pressure demands concentration on the core of the business (specialization, values migration, innovation - every day new improvement EDNI)
Process approach to operational activity becomes necessary, if we want to eliminate weaknesses of the silos approach
Key to success is synchronization of strategy with tactical and operational actions (integration of internal and external aims)
Lean Management i Agile Management determine the necessity to modify previous approach to management (carrying out conflicting aims)
Modern managers must look beyond the perspective of their own company in order to find opportunities for synergy – even in the competition’s systems.
Creating networks with environment surrounding the company is prerequisite for proper (optimal) management of information and goods flow.
Integration increases also the organizational level of companies as well as supply networks
Using modern information technologies for integrating companies as a part of dynamic, logistical networks is one of the conditions necessary to improve effectivness in leading a company.
Information technologies should be seen as one of the factor stimulating organizational changes, though an important one.
The role of a properly aggregated managerial information is crucial for right interpretation of tasks’ results in the context of reaching aims by companies.
The role of a business partner that controllers are aspiring to cannot remain just a „wishful thinking” – there is a real and justified need to support managerial decisions with competent and integrated analytic approach to executed business model
In such a way constructed function of aims determines the need to engage controllers into the process of strategic, tactical and operational planning so that proper construction of integrated indexes and ratios will singnalize deviations of parameters from conditions requiring some action.
Controllers are required to be proactive instead of previous being reactive because „… controlling is a function of co-creating strategic aims, planning as well as guaranteeing transparent results and at the same time being responsible for their implementation”