Application and Supporting Documentation for an Environmental Compliance Approval of Air Emissions

APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL OF AIR EMISSIONS

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies

Cody Candassie

Mauricio Cabra

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

ABC TECHNOLOGIES

APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE APPROVAL OF AIR EMISSIONS

Report to Ministry of Environment Conservation and Parks Client Services and Permissions Branch 135 St. Clair Ave W., 1st Floor Toronto, Ontar io M4V 1P5

Prepared for ABC TECHNOLOGIES

Site Address 2 Norelco Dr , North York, ON M9L 2X6

Prepared by

Cody Candassie Mauricio Cabra

Reviewed by Jennifer Francis Andrea Cline

Date: April 2021

2

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

3

April 2021

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

Table of Contents

Executive Summary……………………………3 Description of the Facility…………………….6 Sources of Contaminants……………………12 Assessment of Significance…………………13 Operating Conditions…………………………16 Source Summary ………………………………22 Dispersion Modelling………………………….25 Interpretation……………………………………26 Proof of Legal Name………………………….. 27 Figures and Maps………………………………30 Supporting Files………………………………..37 Application Forms……………………………...40 Screenview modelling data ……………………..94

4

April 2021

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Executive Summary ABC Technologies is requesting an Environmental Compliance Approval ECA for their facility located on 2 Norelco Dr. North York, ON M9L 2X6, Ontario Canada.

This Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) report is submitted by ABC Technologies in support of the (ECA) (Air) under Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act. The ESDM Report has been prepared in accordance with Section 26 of the Ontario Regulation 419/05; the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (Ministry) Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report (March 2018), and the Ministry's Air Dispersion Modelling Guideline for Ontario (February 2017).

ABC Technologies plant manufactures parts for automotive industry including metallic and plastic components. They cover some facet of the plastic processing technologies, systems, and components for the automotive industry. The resulting products are then shipped across Canada and the US for use in automotive industry. They improve efficiency in manufacturing and assembly, provide cost savings and enhanced quality and performance. The ABC Technology plant typically operates 24 hours per day, 5 days per week with shifts for manufacturing, maintenance and cleaning. On occasions, the ABC Technologies plant may operate up to 24 hours continuously to support local activities during evenings, nights, and / or weekends.

The identified emissions from the ABC Technologies Plant in the production area result mainly from three sources as identified in the diagram 1: Parts Washing, Welding Area and Paint Booth.

5

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Maximum site-wide emissions were modelled using the Ministry approved SCREEN3 system and the corresponding version of the meteorological

data.

The

resulting

Point-of-Impingement

(POI)

concentrations were compared to the standards, guidelines and screening levels provided by the Ministry Air Contaminants Benchmark (ACB) List, dated April 2018 as presented below in Table 4.

The site can operate in compliance because is under the limits.

Table 4: Emission Summary Table

6

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

1. Description of the facility ABC Technologies is a vertically integrated company that offer fullservice automotive components and systems for clients at low costs.

The company has the capabilities to create products with ability to manufacture specific molds and machines. The design and engineering team collaborate with clients to find the most suitable solution based on market research.

ABC Technologies’ tooling and assembly processes accelerate time-tomarket speed and cost savings for clients. The products continue to be safe and durable due to excellent quality assurance policies and procedures. ABC Technologies, from conception to finished product, maintains reputation for innovation and originality due to optimal capabilities.

The facility is located in 2 Norelco Dr. North York, ON M9L 2X6 catalogued as rural with an area of 22300 m2 including adjacent office space. The parking lot is located in the west side and the south side of the plant.

Sources of emission characteristics include roof height of 8 m, height above roof 3 m for emissions derived from paint booths and 2 m for welding exhaust and parts washing, height above grade of 10 m for welding exhaust and parts washing exhaust and 11 m for paint booths, flow rate of 2 m3/s for paint booths and 1.5 m3/s for welding exhaust and parts washing exhaust, diameters of 50 cm for paint booths exhaust, 25 cm for welding exhaust and 30 cm for parts washing exhaust with temperatures of 25 grades calsius for paint booths and welding exhausts and 50 grades celsius for parts washing exhaust. See Tables 2A/2B. 7

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

1.1.1 Operations Operations associated with air emissions include washing, painting and welding. Internal capabilities for tooling with material selection expertise, and simplified assembly operations are developed. ABC Technologies’ Supreme Tooling Group (STG) is an industry leader in blow molding machine design, assembly lines and post-production fixtures. All machines are built in Canada and can be geared to specific resin applications. In addition to these processes, fully robotic paint lines are used, with waterborne interior 1K and 2K paint systems, featuring soft touch capabilities.

NAICS codes are identified as 423120 automotive parts new merchant wholesalers as a primary and 441310 automotiver parts and supply as secondary. The industry code comprises new and or rebuilt automotive parts and accessories.

Raw Materials specific to the site are metallic parts, plastic components, and chemical products as described below. Final products consists of plastic and metallic automotive components.

1.0.1 Parts Washing The washing process in the facility is used to remove contaminants or debris such as dirt, grime, carbon, oil, grease, metal chipos, cutting fluids, mold release agents, paint and corrosion among others from workpieces. The process is designed to clean, degrease and dry bulk loads of small or large parts in preparation for assembly, inspection, surface treatment, and distribution. Parts washing operations includes multi-stage units with pass-through parts handling systems. Washing is essential in maintenance, repair and remanufacturing operations as well.

8

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Chemicals such as solvents are used to remove oils, grease and dirt during the cleaning process. The parts washing fluid uses 10L/d during a work time of 24 hr. per day.

Washing processes are used to remove contaminants, debris, mold carbon and grease from parts in preparation to assembly, inspection and surface treatment with the use of products that include mono trietanolamine, 2N Butyl Benzo(D) isothiazol 3- one that emit contaminants to the exterior.

1.1.2 Welding The company offers many competitive advantages resulting from material selection expertise and assembly operations. The area for welding in the facility uses carbon steel welding. A MIG welder is the best equipment to carry out flawless carbon steel welding, though, because the wire stiffness is designed to pass through the liner from the machine with minimum friction. Depending on the voltage of the MIG welder, the weld can include one of three transfer types: short circuit, spray, or globular transfer.

Steel consists of iron and carbon with small amounts of miscellaneous metals, such as manganese, chromium, silicon, vanadium, and nickel.

Low carbon steel contains only 0.3 percent carbon, making it incredibly easy to weld. The maximum emissions scenario for welding is 10 kg/d during operation of 24 hours.

Medium carbon contains 0.30 to 0.60 percent carbon, and high carbon steels at 0.61 to 2.1 percent carbon. By comparison, cast iron contains up to 3 percent carbon, which makes it incredibly challenging to weld.

9

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Welding operations are based on carbon steel mainly using Iron and Carbon with other products in less amount such as Manganese, Chromium, Silicon and Nickel.

1.1.3 Painting The area of painting includes full robotic paint lines with waterborne interior 1K and 2K paint systems, featuring soft touch capabilities.

There are two different areas of painting to consider air emissions. Black and white paint with 60L/d during 24 hr. periods each.

The system is capable to handling two or more parts at once with parallel pneumatic grippers for handling parts and exchangeable fingers for different parts gripper control using valves located on the robot’s third axis.

The parts input includes Conveyor, chain with beds for precise part placement, conveyor belt for putting away the finished piece,conveyor controlled by an electric motor with a frequency changer.

The Storage is handled according to the customer's request and tailored to the customer's shipping pallets.

The parts output includes the conveyor, the belt conveyor for putting away the finished piece, and the conveyor controlled by an electric motor with a frequency changer. The Palette part placement is arranged according to the customer's requirements Crystalline Silica Powder, Zinc and Carbon Black are used in this area in addition to Aromatic Hydrocarbons Xylene, Toluene and Ethylbenzene.

10

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

The Process Flow Diagram is the following

Fig 2 4

1.1

Summary of Equipment and Operations for which Approval is Sought

11

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

This ESDM Report provides a full site -wide emission inventory and air dispersion modelling exercise for the entire Facility.

2.1 INITIAL IDENTIFICATION OF SOURCES AND CONTAMINANTS

ABC facility operates as an auto parts maker whose goods are used as components in the products of the automotive industry, automotive systems and components for the global automotive industry.

The equipment and operations related to emissions in this emission summary are from washing operations, welding parts and painting of components. Receiving storage and shipping are also activities in this location.

Including the Equipment and any other ancillary and support processes and activities, the facility is operating 24 hours for 7 days a week with periods to maintenance washing and cleaning.

Operations that include discharging to the air as described in the Report.

Auto parts washing fluids 10 L/day 24 hours ( diluted with 90% water) Black Paint 60 L/day ( 24 Hours) White paint 60 L/day ( 24 Hours) Welding 10 Kg/day (24 Hours) Table D-1 below provides a summary of sources and contaminants on site. Negligible sources are discussed in Section 3.0. Significant sources are discussed in Section 4.0.

Table D-1 Sources and Contaminants Identification Table ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6 Significant Source ID

Source Description

Source Location

Expected Contaminants

(Yes/No)

Rationale

Washing 1WA

Parts washing

Parts Washing area

Monoethanolamine

Yes

considered

2WA

Parts washing

Parts Washing area

Yes

Considered

3WA

Parts washing

Parts Washing area

Triethanolamine 2-N- ButylBenzo(D)isothiazoll-3-one

1WE

Carbon Steel Welding Wire

No

Welding Welding Area

Iron

12

Yes

Disp mod

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility 2WE 3WE 4WE 5WE 6WE 7WE 8WE

Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire Carbon Steel Welding Wire

April 2021

Welding Area

Silicon

No

Welding Area

Manganese

No

Welding Area

Molybdenum

No

Welding Area

Copper

No

Welding Area

Nickel

No

Welding Area

Carbon

yes

Welding Area

Chromium

No

1BP

Parts Painting booth

Parts Painting Black Crystalline Silica, respirable Parts Painting fluids powder

2BP

Parts Painting booth

Parts Painting fluids

2-Butoxyethanol

yes

3BP

Parts Painting booth

Parts Painting fluids

Carbon Black

yes

yes

Disp Model

Parts Painting White 1WP 2WP 3WP 4WP 5WP 6WP

Parts painting white booth Parts painting white booth Parts painting white booth Parts painting white booth Parts painting white booth Parts painting white booth

Parts Painting fluids

Ethylbenzene

yes

Parts Painting fluids

Xylene

yes

Parts Painting fluids

Toluene

No

Parts Painting fluids

Titanium Dioxide

yes

Parts Painting fluids

Zinc

yes

Parts Painting fluids

Carbon Black

yes

Disp Mode

Note: It was modelled then significant equals yes, if not no. If the answer is no then refers to a rationale ( If yes then no rationale needed

3.0 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF CONTAMINANTS AND SOURCES As identified in Table D1, some contaminant sources are expected to be negligible and are, therefore, not included in the emission summary or source summary tables. The rationale for defining the sources as insignificant is presented below.

3.1 Sources Exempt from Requiring an ECA (Air) Section 9 (3) of the Environmental Protection Act identifies equipment and operations which are exempt from requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval (Air). Item (a) identifies routine maintenance carried out on any plant, structure, equipment, apparatus, mechanism, or thing to be exempt. Maintenance activities at the Facility are, therefore, considered exempt.

3.2 Screening Out Sources that Emit Contaminants in Negligible Amounts

13

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Table B-1 provide the respective assessment of significance according to Air Contaminants Benchmarks (ACB) list that incorporate sources that emit contaminants in negligible amounts.

The “Air Contaminants Benchmarks (ACB) List: Standards, guidelines and screening levels for assessing point of impingement concentrations of air contaminants” is a compilation of benchmarks established by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change now called Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MEPC or Ministry) to assess contaminants released to air.

The ACB List is intended for use primarily by an emitter who is required to prepare an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) report under Ontario Regulation 419/05 Air Pollution – Local Air Quality (O. Reg. 419/05) or an EASR ESDM report under Ontario Regulation 1/17: Registrations Under Part II.2 of the ActActivities Requiring Assessment of Air Emissions (O. Reg. 1/17) made under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA). For the preparation of this ESDM report, it refers to the above-mentioned regulations and the "Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report document.1

1

Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report Document

14

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

15

April 2021

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Contaminant Sources and Significance: ABC Technologies Figure 1: Plan view drawing of "ABC Engineering"

Welding Emissions – Emissions Stack, Northwest Corner of Building Contaminant

CAS #

Silicon Manganese Molybdenum Copper Nickel Carbon Chromium

7440-21-3 7439-96-5 7439-98-7 7440-50-8 7440-02-0 7440-44-0 7440-47-3

Benchmar k Category B2 B1 B1 B1 B1 B2 B1

Limiting Effect (S

Health Health Particula Health Health Health Health

Table 1: Contaminants of significance from welding operations.

Parts Washing Emissions – Emissions stack, Northeast corner of building Contaminant CAS # Benchmark Limiting Effect Category (Significance) Triethanolamine 102-71-6 B2 Health Table 2: Contaminants of significance from parts washing operations

Paint Booth Emissions – Emissions stack, Southeast corner of building Contaminant Crystaline silica Ethylbenzene

CAS # 14808-60-7 100-41-4

Benchmark Category B1 B1

Limiting Effect Health Odour

Table 3: Contaminants of significance from painting operations

*B1 values are set out by the ministry and if exceeded, the facility will be required to carry out specific actions. If a B2 value is exceeded, the regulations require potential adverse effects to be assessed as per section 28 of Ontario Regulation: 419/05: Air Pollution[ CITATION Gov19 \l 4105 ]

4.1 OPERATING CONDITIONS, EMISSIONS ESTIMATION AND DATA QUALITY Emission rate calculations for significant sources are described in Appendix C. Emissions associated with ABC Technologies facility in 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON are estimated using the US EPA TANKS 4.0.9 model. The TANKS output files are presented in Appendix D. The data quality rating and emission estimation technique are identified for significant sources in the Source Summary Table, Table 2.

4.2 Maximum Emissions Scenario

16

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

The Facility emissions have been assessed using one (1) maximum emissions scenario. The maximum emission scenario assumes that the facility equipment activities are operating at their maximum daily rates, at the same time. These rates are summarized below.

Table 4.1 Autoparts washing fluids Black Paint

10 L/day 24 hours (diluted with 90% water)

60 L/day (24 Hours)

White paint 60 L/day (24 Hours) Welding 10 Kg/day (24 Hours)

The following tables A1, A2-1, A2-2 and A3 show estimated maximum emissions for welding, painting booths (Black and White) and parts washing operations respectively.

TABLE A-1 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM EMISSIONS WELDING ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6

17

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

TABLE A-2-1 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM EMISSIONS PAINTING BOOTH 1 ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6

18

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

TABLE A-2-2 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM EMISSIONS PAINTING BOOTH 2 ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6

19

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

TABLE A-3 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM EMISSIONS PARTS WASHING ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6

20

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

5.0 SOURCE SUMMARY TABLES The Source Summary Tables (Table D4, 2A) show the emission rate for each significant contaminant emitted from each significant source.

The Ministry's Procedure is included in Appendix D. 21

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

Sorted by Source is used. As required by 0. Reg. 419 only significant sources and contaminants are listed in the Source Summary Table.

TABLE D-4 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM EMISSIONS BY SOURCE ABC TECHNOLOGIES 2 Norelco Dr, North York, ON M9L 2X6

Estimated Maximum Emissions Welding Name CAS Emission Rate (g/s) Iron (Fe) 7439-89-6 5.93E-04 22

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility Silicon (Si) Manganese (Mn) Molybdenum (Mo) Copper (Cu) Nickel (Ni) Carbon (C) Chromium (Cr) Parts Washing Name Triethanolamine Monoethanolamine 2-N BUTYL BENZO(D)ISOTHIASOL -3 ONE Paint Booth Emissions Name Zinc Crystaline Silica 2-Butoxyethanol Carbon Black Ethylbenzene Xylene Toluene Titanium Dioxide 2-Butoxyethanol Carbon Black

7440-21-3 7439-96-5 7439-98-7 7440-50-8 7440-02-0 7440-44-0 7440-47-3

6.92E-06 0.000012038 9.0285E-08 3.0095E-06 9.0285E-07 9.0285E-07 9.0285E-07

CAS Number 102-71-6 141-43-5

Emission Rate (g/s) 0.01 0.003

4299-07-04 CAS Number 14808-60-7 111-76-2 1333-86-64

111-76-2 1333-86-64

April 2021

0.000105 Emission Rate (g/s) 8.3E-04 1.24E-3 1.24E-02 1.09E-02 1.4E-03 1.1E-01 1.1E-01 1.4E-01 1.24E-02 8.8E-03

ABC TECHNOLOGIES Facility

Page 10

Table D 2A: Source Summary Table - Source Parameters

23

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021 Page 11

ABC TECHNOLOGIES FACILITY

Table 2B: Source Summary Table - Source Emission Data

24

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021 Page 12

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report

6.1 AIR DISPERSION MODELLING Screen View is a user-friendly interface for the U.S. EPA screening model Screen3.

Air dispersion modelling for the worst-case ground level concentrations was undertaken to model scenarios with simple or complex terrain, with or without building downwash and obtain results at discrete or automated distances.

This model calculates maximum hourly concentrations, which are used to provide maximum 1-h our, 24-hour, and annual average concentrations using the appropriate supplied meteorological data. (3) 6.2 Screen 3 Screen 3 is a Ministry approved dispersion modelling system that can be used to assess pollutant concentrations from a wide variety of complex industrial settings including multiple stacks such as the case of ABC Technologies Facility, fugitive emissions, and building wake effects.

The advantage is the real time web-based program that can demonstrate the correlation between pollutant emissions from industrial processes and their impact concentrations.

The Screen View is a free software package and is designed for screening level air dispersion modelling. With conservative calculations and simplified input

25

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report ABC Technologies Facility

April 2021

requirements, Screen View is ideal for initial screening runs such as the case of ABC Technologies Facility.

6.2.1

Dispersion Modelling Input Summary Table

To demonstrate compliance with 0. Reg. 419/05, Table D3 provides a description of the way in which the approved dispersion model was used.

ABC TECHNOLOGIES FACILITY

Page 13

7.0 Interpretation

26

Appendix A Proof of Legal Name

2

2 Retrieved on March 14 2021 from www.ABC_Technologies Cdertificate 006189 EMS ENG REV.pdf

Appendix B Figures and Map

Plan view taken from google3

3 Retrieved on March 14 2021 from www.google earth

ABC Engineering Emission Source Location on Roof

•

Parts Washing #2 •

Welding #1

Production Area

Paint Booth #3

•

Office Area

ABC

Welding

TECHNOLOGIES

AUTOPARTS MANUFACTURER

Parts washing

Paint Booth

#1

Emission

Roof

Description

Height

Paint Booth Welding Exhaust Parts Washing Exhaust

8 metres 8 metres 8 metres

Height above

Height above

Roof

Grade

3 metres 2 metres 2 metres

Flow Rate

Diameter

Temperature

11 metres 10 metres

2 m3/s 1.5 m3/s

25°c 25°c

10 metres

1.5 m3/s

0.5 metres 0.25 metres 0.3 metres

Note: all of the heating equipment at the plant is electric.

There is no natural gas fired heating equipment.

50°c

ABC Technologies

Ai

ECA Supporting I Calculations April 2021

ABC Engineering - Useage Rates

1.

2.

Welding Wire = 10 kg/day (24 hours) Parts Washing Fluid = 10 L/days (24 hours). Note that the product is diluted with 90% water to 10% parts washing fluid.

3.

4.

Black Paint = 60 L/day (24 hours) White Paint = 60 L/day (24 hours) •

Note : The Safety Data Sheets are attached Annexe G

ABC Technologies

Ai

ECA Supporting I Calculations April 2021

APPENDIX A Table of Contents 1.0 Usage Rates....................................................................................................A1 2.0 Methodology:...................................................................................................A1 3.0 Emissions.........................................................................................................A3 3.1 General Information...............................

A3 3.1.1 Balance of .A3 Assumptions........................ .

A4 3.1.2 Table EA-99: Site ......

A4 Emissions Summary.

3.2 Building Exhaust 3.3

ABC TECHNOLOGIES

ECA Supporting Calculations APRIL 2021

1.0

Usage Rates Please see information below for maximum usage rates corresponding to the operating conditions that would result in the maximum emission rate in accordance with s.10 and s.11 of O.Reg. 419/05.

ABC Engineering - Usage Rates Welding Wire = 10 kg/day (24 hours) 6. Parts Washing Fluid = 10 L/days (24 hours). Note that the product is diluted with 90% water to 10% parts washing fluid.

5.

Black Paint = 60 L/day (24 hours) 8. White Paint = 60 L/day (24 hours) 7.

ABC TECHNOLOGIES

ECA Supporting Calculations APRIL 2021

2.0 Methodology: USEPA Emission Factor ("EF")

Emission factors are usually derived from a number of data sources and generally are an average of all the data of an acceptable quality. As such, they are assumed to be representative of the long-term operation of all of the facilities considered. In some instances, where interdependencies are observed, the emission factor may be based on several process parameters (e.g., temperature and wind speed).

The general equation for using emission factors is: E = A×EF ×(1− ER /100) where; E = emissions, A = process parameter, EF = emission factor, and ER = overall emission reduction efficiency (such as removal efficiency, etc.).

Emission factors are generally based on published data sets (from real measurements for instance), that can usually vary considerably in scope and precision. For example, one reference may include several detailed process steps with the emissions categorized and measured at each step, while another may give only general measurement results for a few sources. Several emission factors may also exist for the same pollutant under different circumstances (e.g. differing pollution control devices, different process designs, etc.). As a result, emission factors are assigned a quality rating to reflect the robustness, or appropriateness, of the emission factor for a certain use, along with some guidance/details to ensure that it is used for the correct process.

ABC TECHNOLOGIES

ECA Supporting Calculations APRIL 2021

The emission rate for the washing unit was calculated using the usage rate provided

by ABC Tachnologies and the weight percentage provided on the SDS for each compound used in the unit. The transfer efficiency was 10 % Sample Calculation Washing units ABC Technologies Given transfer efficiency of 10% water dilution of 90 % washing usage rate of 0.4 L/hr washing products density 0f 1000g/L. Triethanolamine max % component 5 % no volatile The solution for non volatile component 0.4 L/hr at a percentage of 5% multiplied per 1000 g/L and 1 hr / 3600 s ER = 5x10x3 The result is 1.0E-02 g/s

"Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Facto rs . AP-42. Fifth Edition Volume 1: Stationact Point and Area Sources" Table 1.4-1 from the Air CHIEF CD-RO M Version 12, June 2005.

2 "Compilation of Air Po ll ut a n t Emiss ion Facto r s AP-42. F i ft h Ed iti o n Volu m e 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources" Table 1.4 -1 from the Air CHIEF CD-RO M Version 12, June 2005.

3.1

Emissions

3.2

General Information

3.2.1

Balance of Assumptions

In order to represent the worst case emission scenario for the Site a number of conservative assumptions were used in the assessment. All of the assumptions used throughout the Application are listed together so that it can be seen that the balance of assumptions is generally conservative.

• All the equipment is assumed to be operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week all year.

The equipment and operations related to emissions in this emission summary are from washing operations, welding parts and painting of components.

Receiving storage and shipping are also activities in this location without emissions to consider.

Including the Equipment and any other ancillary and support processes and activities, the facility is operating 24 hours for 7 days a week with periods to maintenance washing and cleaning.

Operations that include discharging to the air as described in the Report.

Autoparts washing fluids Black Paint

10 L/day 24 hours ( diluted with 90% water)

60 L/day ( 24 Hours)

White paint 60 L/day ( 24 Hours) Welding 10 Kg/day (24 Hours)

Whitesand Armstrong Station . Onta ri o

Table EA-C: Cooli ng Towers

Proj ect No.: 030895

3.2.2 Site Emissions Summary ES-1

Table ES-1 ID Table 4 lists all the emissions from all the sources at the Site. It also adjusts the emissions calculated on the series of tables for the cases described below.

The value shown is the maximum emission rate calculated on the corresponding calculation sheet for that contaminant.

Table 4 shows a "yes" in the column for "Significant" Table 4 shows a "B1" or “B2” in the column for "Benchmark Cathegory"

APPENDIX B

Supporting Information for Assessment of Negligibility

Table of Contents

Part

1.0 Air Contaminants Benchmarks lists used........1 2.0 Connections between ACB list and O.Reg 419/05.. ..2 3.0 B1 Values...........................................................3 4.0 B2 Values...........................................................4 5.0 Reference Materials...........................................5

1.0 Air Contaminants Benchmarks The “Air Contaminants Benchmarks (ACB) List: Standards, guidelines and screening levels for assessing point of impingement concentrations of air contaminants” is a compilation of benchmarks established by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (the Ministry) to assess contaminants released to air.

The ACB List is intended for use primarily by an emitter who is required to prepare an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) report under Ontario Regulation 419/05 Air Pollution – Local Air Quality (O. Reg. 419/05) or an EASR ESDM report under Ontario Regulation 1/17: Registrations Under Part II.2 of the Act- Activities Requiring Assessment of Air Emissions (O. Reg. 1/17) made under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA). For more information on the preparation of ESDM reports, please refer to the above mentioned regulations and the ""Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report"" document. " 2.0 Connections Between ACB List and O. Reg. 419/05 Some of the values set out in the ACB List are air standards that are set out in O. Reg. 419/05. Any discrepancy between this document and O. Reg. 419/05 will be resolved in favour of the regulation.

In order to determine which values in the ACB List apply to a facility, one must determine if section 19 or 20 of O. Reg. 419/05 applies to the facility. In general, section 19 of O. Reg. 419/05 (i.e. Schedule 2 standards) applies to most facilities until February 1, 2020 after which all facilities in Ontario will be required to comply with section 20 of O. Reg. 419/05 (i.e. Schedule 3 standards and the newer models set out in section 6 the regulation).

There are facilities in Ontario that have been phased into section 20 of O. Reg. 419/05 prior to February 1, 2020. Some examples include: • A facility that is in a class identified by a NAICS code set out in Schedule 4 or 5 of O. Reg. 419/05; • A facility emitting a contaminant that has been “sped up” under subsection 20(4) or (5) of O. Reg. 419/05; and • A facility that has received a site-specific standard approval for a specific contaminant under s.35 of O. Reg. 419/05.

For a complete list, please refer to ""Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report"" document."

"The ACB List also identifies which contaminants have an upper risk threshold (URT) listed in Schedule 6 of O. Reg. 419/05. URTs are neither standards nor screening levels.

URTs are concentrations, which if exceeded at a point of impingement, require timely actions (i.e. immediate notification to the ministry in writing, and submission of an ESDM report for the contaminant that was exceeded within 3 months). For more information, please refer to section 30 of O. Reg. 419/05 and the ""Guideline for the Implementation of Air Standards in Ontario (GIASO)"" document.

Although the ACB List sets out concentrations for contaminants that are standards in O. Reg. 419/05, there are certain circumstances where a facility may have another compliance approach; namely, complying with a site-specific standard or a technical standard. A facility that has approval for a site-specific standard would assess compliance for that contaminant against its site-specific standard. A facility that is registered to a technical standard with respect to a contaminant, does not have to comply with the concentration-based air standard for the contaminant if all of the sources of the contaminant at that facility are addressed in one or more technical standards and

the facility is registered for all of these technical standards. In these cases, facilities are not required to have an ESDM report for these contaminants.

"Benchmark Values In the ACB List, two categories of benchmark are specified: Benchmark 1 (B1) values and Benchmark 2 (B2) values. Exceedance of a B1 value triggers specific actions under O. Reg. 419/05 and is an offence under O. Reg. 1/17. Exceedance of a B2 value triggers a toxicological assessment to determine the potential for adverse effect.

3.0 Benchmark 1 (B1) Values Setting B1 Values In general, B1 values are standards and guideline values used to protect the human health and the natural environment against adverse effects. Existing ministry processes for development of standards and guidelines and associated consultation processes remain unchanged. Generally, the B1 values are numerically the same as Ambient Air Quality Criteria (AAQCs); however, B1 values and AAQCs are used differently. B1 values are intended to assess the contribution of a contaminant to air by a regulated facility whereas AAQCs are used to assess general air quality in relations to all sources, not just emissions from a single facility. A separate list of AAQCs is available in the document ""Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria"".

"Ministry Expectations In the context of an Environment Compliance Approval (ECA), the Director under section 9 of the EPA may exercise his or her discretion to refuse to issue an ECA if he or she considers it to be necessary for the purposes of protecting and conserving the natural environment. Accordingly, it is expected that an ESDM report prepared for the purpose of section 22 of O. Reg. 419/05 will demonstrate that the concentration of a contaminant is at or below the B1 value for the contaminant. Please note that this does not apply to facilities operating under a site-specific standard for a specific contaminant.

An EASR ESDM report prepared under O. Reg. 1/17 must be signed and sealed by a licensed engineering practitioner and must demonstrate that the concentration of each contaminant discharged or proposed to be discharged from the facility is at or below the B1 value for the contaminant. Further, at all times when engaging in an activity prescribed by O. Reg. 1/17, the person must ensure that the concentration of a contaminant is at or below the B1 value for the contaminant – to exceed a B1 value is an offence.

Regardless of whether an activity is governed by section 9 of the EPA (i.e. for ECAs), section 20.21 of the EPA (i.e. for EASR) or exempt from section 9 of the EPA, discharges from the facility must still comply with O. Reg. 419/05.

"Exceedance of a B1 value identifies the need for a facility to take action under O. Reg. 419/05. Such action would include notification of the ministry under section 28 of O. Reg. 419/05 and the submission of an abatement plan within 30 days. Note that if the B1 value is an air standard set out in O. Reg. 419/05, the facility may be able to request a site-specific standard or register to a sector-based technical standard, if one exists. If the B1 value is a guideline, facilities may also register for a technical standard if one exists for that facility in that sector.

Note that for contaminants with multiple B1 values, all values must be used for assessment purposes because each represents a different type of effect linked to a particular averaging period. The ACB List sets out some B1 values that have an annual

averaging period. For these values, the ministry expects a comparison also be made to Assessment Values (see Table 2) for the purpose of addressing short-term periods of elevated exposure. The annual assessment values (AAVs) and daily assessment values (DAVs) are used as supplementary information to help ensure no adverse effect is likely to occur as a result of the discharge of a contaminant with an annual standard. For more information please see the Technical Bulletin ""Using Assessment Values for Contaminants with Annual Air Standards"".

4.0 Benchmark 2 (B2) Values Setting B2 Values The ACB List sets out over 4500 B2 values. Approaches used by the ministry to establish a B2 value are considered conservative - exceeding a B2 value does not necessarily mean an adverse effect is expected. If a person demonstrates that the concentration of a contaminant is at or below a B2 value, no adverse effect is anticipated. If person demonstrates that the concentration of a contaminant is above a B2 value, further work must be done to determine the whether an adverse effect is likely at the concentration. The B2 value for a contaminant may be exceeded if a toxicological assessment shows that no adverse effect is expected at the point of impingement concentration.

Generally, B2 values are set by the ministry using a process that includes an internal peer review and public notification. Most B2 values are set from values used by other jurisdictions. The ministry may also set B2 values based on previous toxicological assessments and resulting recommendations made under the approvals program. These approaches are further discussed below. " "Jurisdictional Screening Level (JSL) (Source: SL-JSL) The JSL list was first introduced by the ministry in 2008 in response to requests from stakeholders to further streamline and expedite the review of air contaminants without limits. The JSL screening levels are based on a review of air quality values available in other jurisdictions and established using the following steps: " "Step 1) Chronic air quality values (intended to protect against adverse health effects from long-term exposure) and their associated averaging time periods are compiled from 11 agencies for which we are confident in the basis of the values are health. They include Health Canada, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the World Health Organization, the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment of the Netherlands (RIVM), and the Environmental Protection Agencies from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Texas.

For carcinogens where a risk level or averaging period is not specified, concentrations reflecting a one in one million (10-6) incremental cancer risk are included with an annual averaging period.

If several chronic values for a contaminant are available in one jurisdiction (e.g. values specific to contaminant form – vapour vs dust, or value are specific to end-point - cancer vs non-cancer), the most stringent value is selected to represent that jurisdiction. "

"Step 2) All chronic air quality values are converted to an equivalent concentration representing a 24-hr averaging time period in order to select the median. The equivalent 24-hour concentration is calculated using the conversion-factor equation set out in subsection 17(3) of O. Reg. 419/05. " "Step 3) For each contaminant, the JSL is set according to the following criteria: For a contaminant with an odd number of limits, the limit representing the median is set as the JSL; For a contaminant with an even number of limits, the limit just below the median is set as the JSL; If only two limits are available, the lower of the two limits is selected as the JSL; If only one limit is available for a contaminant, the limit is divided by 10 to account for the uncertainty in using a single value as the JSL. " "Step 4) For each JSL selected, a concentration representing a 1/2-hr averaging time period is calculated for the ACB List using the conversion-factor equation set out in subsection 17(3) of O. Reg. 419/05. " "Ministry-derived (MD) Screening Levels (Source: SL-MD) In the context of an ECA application, the ministry performs in-house toxicological assessments on modelled concentrations of air contaminants without limits to ensure against adverse effects. Assessments entail a review of the physical/chemical characteristics, toxicity information, existing jurisdictional values available for a contaminant and existing ministry B1 benchmarks if appropriate (e.g. if present in particulate form, suspended particulate matter standard may be an appropriate value to assess against). A ministry derived screening level is a value taken from an in-house toxicological assessment which recommends a concentration that is considered to be protective against adverse effects. " "Previously Accepted (PA) Screening Levels (Source: SL-PA) In the context of an ECA application, the ministry performs in-house toxicological assessments on modelled concentrations of air contaminants without limits to ensure against adverse effects. Through this process, some modelled concentrations for a contaminant are deemed ""acceptable"" (i.e. below a concentration associated with a potential adverse effect level). These accepted concentrations are compared to B2 values set using the JSL approach described above. If an accepted concentration of the contaminant is higher than the JSL value, the accepted concentration was used as the B2 value.

In this way, ministry assessments which consider toxicological information specific to a contaminant replaces a lower JSL value which represents a median of air quality values.

These screening values are a modelled concentration potentially emitted from a facility, and therefore do not necessarily represent the highest concentration which the ministry would consider acceptable. " "Ministry Expectations Both an ESDM report under O. Reg. 419/05 and an EASR ESDM report under O. Reg. 1/17 must be prepared in accordance with section 26 of O. Reg 419/05. As set out in section 26 of O. Reg. 419/05, the report must list all contaminants discharged from the property. If the concentration of a contaminant at a point of impingement is below a B2 value set out in the ACB List, it is not likely that an adverse effect would occur. If the assessment indicates a concentration that is above a B2 value, a toxicological assessment would need to be performed to determine the potential for adverse effect at such a concentration.

If it is determined that an adverse effect may occur at the concentration set out in the ESDM report, it is expected that the toxicological assessment would indicate the concentration below which an adverse effect would not be likely in the particular circumstances being assessed.

Also note that if a contaminant is not listed in the ACB List, a person must assess the potential for the concentration of the contaminant to cause an adverse effect. Further information on how to consider contaminants with no values set out in the ACB List is provided in the ""Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report"". " 5.0 Referenced Materials Ontario Regulation 419/05 - Local Air Quality Regulation Ontario Regulation 1/17: Registrations Under Part II.2 of the Act- Activities Requiring Assessment of Air Emissions Guideline A-10: Procedure for Preparing an Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report (PIBS#3614e04) Guideline for the Implementation of Air Standards in Ontario (GIASO) (PIBS # 5166e03) Ontario Ambient Air Quality Criteria (PIBS# 6570e01) Technical bulletin: Using assessment values for contaminants with annual air standards End of worksheet

Appendix E SCREEN 3 Supporting Files

'

NRPLOT View Lakes Environmental Sofware

Appendix F ESDM Report

Blank Page for signature page

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling Report Checklist Submitted

Required Informa tion

Explanat ion/Reference

Executive Summary and Emission Summary Table

1.0

2.0

1.1 Overview of ESDM Report

[{] Yes

1.2 Emission Summary Table

[{] Yes

Executive Summary Table ES-!

1.1 Purpose and Scope of ESDM Report (when report only represents a portion of facility)

[{] Yes

Section 1.0

1.2 Description of Processes and NAICS code(s)

[{] Yes

1.3 Description of Products and Raw Materials

[{] Yes

1.4 Process Flow Diagram

[{] Yes

1.5 Operating Schedule

[{] Yes

Section 1.0, Section 1.4 Section 1.2, Section I.4 Figures l A-1C (Appendix B) Section 1.2

[{] Yes

Section 2.0, Table 1

3.1 Identfiication of Negligible Contaminants and Sources

[{] Yes

3.2 Rationale for Assessment

[{] Yes

Section 3, Table 1 Section 3

[{] Yes

Section 4

Introduction and Facility Descript ion

Initial Identification of Sources and Con taminan ts 2.1 Sources and Contaminants Identification Table

3.0

4.0

Assessment of the Significance of Contaminants and Sources

Operating Conditions, Emission Rate Estimatingand Data Quality 4.1 De scription of opera ting conditio ns, for each significant contaminant that results in the maximum POI concentration for that contaminant 4.2 Explanation of Method used to calculate the emissionrate for each

[{] Yes

Ta ble 2B, Appendix C

4.3 Sam plecalculation for each method

[{] Yes

4.4 Assessment of Data Qual ity for each emission rate

[{] Yes

Appendix C Table 2B, Appendix C

contaminant

5.0

6.0

7.0

Source Summary Table and Property Plan 5.1 Source Summary Table

[{] Yes

5.2 Site Plan (scalable)

[{] Yes

Tables 2A & 2B Figure 2 (Appendix B)

Dispersion Modelling 6. 1 Dispersion Modelling Input Summary Table

[{] Yes

6.2 Land Use Zoning Designation Plan

[{] Yes

6.3 Dispersion Modelling Input and Output Files

[{] Yes

Ta bles 4A and 4B AppendixB Tables 4A and 4B, CD

Emission Summary Table and Conclusions

7.1 Emission Summary Table

[{] Yes

Table 5

7.2 Assessment of Contaminants with no MOE POI Limits

[{] Ye s

NIA

7.3 Conclusions

[{] Yes

Section 7.0

Appendices (Provide supporting information or delails such as...)

Proof of Legal Name I Figures & Zoning Map / Emission Calculations TANKS Files / SCREEN3 Supporting Files I ESDM Checklist and Application Forms

[{] Yes [{] Yes

□

Appendix A /A ppendix B I Appendix C Appendix D / Appendix E I AppendixF

Yes

5357 E (2017/03)

Ontario

Environmental Compliance Approval Application

Ministry of the

Environment

Table of Contents 2.4 General Information and Instructions................

1 2.5 1 Applicant Information...................................

2.6 2 3 1.1 1.2 1.3

2 2.1 2.2

Approval Information....................................... 5 Other Approval/Pe rmits for Facility.................6 Technical Contacts..........................................6

Regulatory Requirements............................8

Applicant Information.......................................

3.1 Envi ronmenta l Bill of Rights (EBR) Requirements 8 2 3.2 Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) Requirements 8 Applicant Physical Address.............................

2 3.3 3 Consultation/Notification.............................9 3 Applicant Mailing Address..........................

4 Site Information.............................................11 3 4.1 Site Address or Storage Location................... 11

Project Information.......................................

4.2 Site or Storage Location Information............... 12 4 4.3 Project Name and Description.........................

4.4 4 4.5 Application Type..............................................

4 4.6

2.3 ProjectType. . '.5

..............

5

Site Zoning and Classification.........................12 Point of Entry into Ontario...............................13 Source Protection/Drinking Water Threats......13 Receiver of Effluent Discharge........................13

Facility Information 5.1

15

Air.................................................................

5.2 Noise.............................................................

5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7

Sewage Works..............................................

6.3 Noise and Vibration.......................................30 6.4

Sewage Works..............................................30

6.5

Waste Disposal Sites.................................... 31

6.6

Waste Management Systems........................ 32

6.7 Mobile Waste Processing.............................. 33 Waste Disposal Site......................................

6.8 Cleanup of Contaminated Sites....................33 Waste Management Systems (Except Mobile Waste Processing)................6.9 Other Attachments........................................33 6.1O Confidentiality...............................................33 Waste Management System 7 Authorization...............................................34 Mobile Waste Processing..............................

7.1 Statement of the Applicant............................34 Cleanup of Contaminated Sites....................

7.2

6

Statement of the Municipality........................34

Supporting Documentation and Technical Requirements.....................7.3 Statement of Technical Contacts...................34 8 Payment Information..................................36 6.1 General..........................................................

Application Summary.........................................37 6.2 Air..................................................................

Ontario

Ministry

Environmental Compliance Approval Application

General Information and Instructions General Information Information requested in this form is collected under the authority of the Environmental Protec tion Act (EPA), Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA) and Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR), and will be used to evaluate applications for Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs} issuedunder Part 11.1 of the EPA. This application form should not be used for mobile PCB destruction facilities.

For all questions related to preparing or submitting this form or about the Ministry's collection of information related to applying for an ECA, contact: Client Services and Permissions Branch 135 St. Clair Ave. West, 1st Floor Toronto Ontario M4V 1P5 Telephone outside Toronto 1-800-461-6290 or in Toronto 416-314-8001.

Instructions 1.

2.

Applicants are responsible for ensuring that they complete the most recent application form. Application forms and information about the required supporting documentation and technical requirements are available from the Client Services and Permissions Branch (the address and phone number are provided in the General Information on this page}. As well, you can get this information from your local District Office of the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, and online at: https:1/www ontario ca/page/environmental-approvals A complete application consists of: a completed and signed application form; all required supportingdocuments and technical requirements identified in:

i. this form, ii. Ministry guidance, iii. the Applications for Environmental Compliance Approvals regulation, and payment of the application fee (in Canadian funds} by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Minister of Finance, or credit card payment (for payments up to $10,000). For Transfer of Review, make the cheque or money order payable to the appropriate municipality. The Ministry may return or refuse incomplete applications to the applicant. The Director may require additional informationof any application initially accepted as complete.

3.

Submit the complete application as follows: One (1) paper copy (unless the application is a Transferof Review} , one (1) electronic copy and the fee to the Director, Client Services and Permissions Branch at the address provided in the General Information on this page.

If the application is a Transfer of Review, the applicant must submit two (2) copies of the completed application and the fee to the designated municipal authority.

4.

The applicant must also send a copy of the appl ication without the fee to the local Ministry District Office that has jurisdiction over the area where the facilities are located. DO NOT send payment to the District Office.

To locate the appropr iate local Ministry District Office, visit the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change website at http://www.ontario.ca/environment-andenergy/ministry-environment-and-climate-change-reqional-and district-offices

5.

For Waste Disposal Sites the applicant must also send a copy of the application without the fee to the Clerk's office of the local municipality (both upper and lower tier) in which the facility/proposed facility is lo cated unless the application is for a revocation or an amendment that is environmentally insigni ficant or the applicant is a municipality. DO NOT send any payment informationto the municipality.

8551E (2017/12)

CC Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2017

Disponible en fra nc;:ai s

P age 1 of 38

Information collected by the Ministry of the Environmen t and Climate Change is subject to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). If the applicant is of the view that any part of the application is confidential on the grounds that such information constitutes a trade secret or scientific, technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information, please make this known now. Otherwise, the Ministry may make the information available to the public without further notice to the applicant.

II is an offence under the EPA and OWRA to provide false or misleading information in this application and/or accompanying documents.

Complete the sections as shown below.

Section 1: Applicant Information Section 2: Project Information Section 3: Regulatory Requ irements Section 4: Site Information Section 5: Facility Information Section 6: Supporting Documentation Section 7: Payment Information Section 8: Authorization Fields marked with an asterisk (• ) are mandatory.

1. Applicant Information 1.1 Applicant Information Applicant Type •

0 D

Corporation

D Individual

Partnership

D Provincial Government D Sole Proprietor

D Federal Government D Municipal Government

D Other (specify) Applicant Name (Legal name of individual or organization as evidenced by legal documents) • ABC TECHNOLOGIES

0 Select if Business Name same as Applicant Name Business Name • ABC TECHNOLOGIES Business Number

Business Website Address

123456 Primary North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code •

441310 Other NAICS Code

423120 Sepa rate list attached?

D Yes D No Business Activity Description Autoparts Manufacturing Completion Status (1.1 Applicant Information) 1.2 Applicant Physical Address Address Type? *

0 Civic Address D Survey Address Page 2 of 38

8551E (2017/12)

Civic Address Unit Number Number

Street

Street Name Norelco Dr

2 Survey Address Enter Lot and Concession or Part and Reference Plan Lot

I Concession

I Part

I Reference

Plan

41

hi ns w To d ize an rg o Un y/ lit • pa te ici ta r• un /S be M rk ce m Yo ovin io Nu 2 Pr ar one 178 t On eph 46l Te 6-2 p •

t. ex N ax

IF

t ric ist /D ty un • r Co try be un da Num Co na Ca bile o M

r be um

M

I

m .co es

de Co ip l/Z 6 sta 2X Po 9L

• gi lo ss re no ch dd l A bcte ai a Em e@ v da

I

•

Geo Reference Description of location

Map Datum

Zone

Accuracy Estimate

GeoReferencing Method

UTM Easting

UTM Northing

Southwest corner of property Physical location of front door or main entrance

Completion Status (1.2 Applicant Physical Address) 1.3 Applicant Mailing Address

[Z] Select if same as Physical Address Unit Number

I Street Number *

Street Name * Norelco Dr

2

Delivery Designator

Delivery Identifier

Municipality/Unorganized Township * York

County/District

Province/State • Ontario

Country • Canada

Telephone Number*

F ax Number

Mobile Number

416-246-1782 ext.

I Postal Station

Postal/Zip Code * I

ML9 2X6

Email Address *

I dave@abctechnologies

Completion Status (1.3 Applicant Mailing Address)

8551 E (2017/12)

Page 3 of 38

2. Project Information 2.1 Project Name and Description Project Description Executive Summary • ABC Tecnologies plant manufactures parts for automotive industry including metallic and plastic components.

They cover some facet of the plastic processing technologies, systems, and components for the automotive industry. The resulting products are then shipped across Canada and the US for use in automotive industry. They improve efficiency in manufacturing and assembly, provide cost savings and enhanced quality and performance. The ABC Technology plant typically operates 24 hours per day, 5 days per week with shifts for manufacturing, maintenance and cleaning. On occasions, the ABC Technologies plant may operate up to 24 hours continuously to support local activities during evenings, nights, and / or weekends.

The identified emissions from the ABC Technologies Plant in the production area result mainly from three sources as identified in the diagram 1: Parts Washing, Welding Area and Paint Booth.

Supplemen tal Application Information (select information button for required information for this field) • One copy of the application and supporting documentation has been mailed to the District Manager at the Ministry of the Environment , Conservation and Parks (MECP) Ottawa District Office One hard copy and one electronic copy of this application have been provided to the Client Services and Permissions Branch.

Completion Status (2.1 Project Name and Description) 2.2 Application Type Type *

[Z] New ECA

D Revocation of existing ECA D Application for renewalof limited operational

D Amendment to existing EGA D Administrative amendment to existing ECA D Consolidation of existing ECAs

flexibility

Is this application for the addition of a new project type to the site or a new municipal waste category/class code to the waste management systems or a new sewage facility type?

D Yes D No 8551 E (2017/12)

Page 4 of 38

Is this application for Transfer of Review?•

D Yes [l] No Completion Status (2.2 Application Type)

2.3 Project Type Project Type (Select all that apply) •

[l] Noise Vibration Waste Disposal Site - Landfill site

NIA

D Waste Disposal Site - Transfer site D Waste Disposal Site - Processing site D Waste Disposal Site - Composting site D Waste Disposal Site - Thermal Treatment si1e

□ D D D D D D D D

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □

□ 0 □ □ □

Air - Mobile

D D

Pilot Project?

0

[l] Air - Stationary

0

Limi ted Operational Flexibility?

N/A N/A

Sewage - Private

□ □ □

Waste Managemen1 System - General Was1e Management System

N/A

Waste Managemen1 System - Hauled Sewage (Septage)

N/A

Waste Managemen1 System - Soil Conditioner for tran sport to a site for Applica1ion on Land

N/A

Waste Managemen1 System - Mobile Waste Processing

N/A

Cleanupof contaminated sites - Mobile

N/A

Cleanupof contaminated sites - Sile specific

N/A

Sewage - Industrial Sewage - Municipal

Comp letion Status (2.3 Pr oject Type)

2.4 Approval Information Application initiated by *

0

Applicant

D Cond ition of existing

D S. 20.18 Order (attach copy) D Provincial Officer Order (attach copy) D Other

(specify)

approval

D Inspec tion Report (attach copy)

Current Environmental Compliance Approvals that may be changed or amended by this application: 0 N/A Env ironmental Compliance Approval Number *

Date of Issuance (yyyy/m m/dd)•

Separa te list attached?

□

Yes

0

No

Proposed Environmental Compliance Approvals related to this project: G'.]N/A Projec t Type

Mini stry Reference Number (if applicable)

Have Submitted

□

Have not Submitted

□

Separate list attached?

D

Yes

0

No

8551E (2017/12)

Page 5 of 38

Completion Status (2.4 Approval Information) 2.5 Other Approval/Permits for Facility 0 NIA List all other instruments (approvals or permits) issued by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change or applied for under the Environmental Protection Act , Environmental Assessment Act , Ontario Water Resources Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 and any Environmental Activity and Sector Regist rations that are relevant to this application.

Instrument Type

Instrument Number/ Application Re ference Number

Approval or Application Date (yyyylmm/dd)

Sepa rate 11st attached?

Yes

No

List all other instruments (approvals or permits) issued by an agency, municipality or another ministry that are relevant to this application.

Issuing Agency

□□

Approval or Permit Number

Approval or Permit Name

Issued Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

Sepa rate 11st attached?

Yes

No Completion Status (2.5 Other Approval/Permits for Facility)

2.6 TechnicalContacts Technical Contact 1 Area of Respons ibility (Select all that apply) •

[Z] Air D NoiseNi bration D Sewage D Waste

I First Name• Jenn

Name of Technical Contact Last Name • Francis Company* GHD Consulting Addr ess Information

D Select if same as Applicant Mailing Address Civic Address Unit Number

I

Street Number•

Street Name • Philip SAtreet

435

I Postal Station

Delivery Identifier

Delivery Designator Municipality/Unorgan ized Township • Waterloo Province/State • Ontario

County/District

Telephone Number*

Mobile Number

I

226-505-1559

ext. 117

Country • Canada

Fax Number

Postal/Zip Code • I

L3Y 3Y8

Email Address *

2265051558 I jenn@ghdenvironmental .com

Technical Contact 2 Area of Responsibility (Select all that apply) •

D Air 0 NoiseNi bration D Sewage D Waste Page 6 of 38

85 51E (2017/ 12 )

Name of Technical Contact Last Name • Cline

First Name •

Andrea

Company •

Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited Addr ess Information

D Select if same as Applicant Mailing Address Civic Address Unit Number 6467

I Street Number•

Street Name •

philips

2000

Delivery Designator

Delivery Identifier

Municipality/Unorganized Township •

I Postal Station

County/District

Waterloo Province/State •

Country •

Ontario

Canada

Telephone Number• 905-826-4044

Mobile Number

F ax Number ext. 266

Completion Status (2.6 Technical Contacts)

Postal/Zip Code • I

LSN 1P7

Email Address •

I sandrea@ghdenvironmental.com

8551 E (2017/ 12 )

Page 7 of 38

3.

Regulatory Requirements

3.1

Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) Requirements

Is this a proposal for a prescribed instrument under the EBR? • [Z]Yes D No If yes, is this proposal exempted from the EBR requirements? Yes 0 No If yes, please check one of the following (Please provide supporting information.)

D This proposal has been considered in a substantially equivalent process of public participation. (EBR, 1993, s.30.)

□

Was the public participation process carried out in fulfillment of the requirements related to an approval under the Planning Act? If yes, was the Planning Act approval related to a plan of subdivision?

□ Yes

D No

D This proposal is for an emergency situation. (EBR, 1993 , s. 29.)

D This proposal is for an amendment to or revocation of an existing Environmental Compliance Approval that is not environmentally significant. (EBR, 1993 , s. 22 (3).)

D This proposal has been subject to or exempted from EAA Requirements or considered in a decision of a tribunal. (EBR, 1993, s. 32.)

Completion Status (3.1 Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) Requirements) 3.2

Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) Requirements

Is the proposed undertaking subject to the requirements of the EAA? •

D Yes 0 No If yes, please select one of the following:

D The proposed undertaking has fulfilled the requirements of the EAA through the completion of a Class EA process Name of Class EA Schedule/Group/Category (if applicable) If applicable, please submit a copy of the proof of completion (for example, Notice of Completion).

Was the undertaking subject of a Part II Order request(s)?

D Yes D No If yes, please submit a copy of the Director 's or Minister's decision letter.

D The proposed undertaking has fulfilled all of the requirements for the EAA through: Select all that apply:

D completion of an Environmental Screeni ng Process pursuant to 0 . Reg. 101/07 of the EAA Dcompletion of an Environmental Screening Process pursuant to 0 . Reg. 116/01 of the EAA Was the undertaking subject of an elevation request(s)?

□Yes

D No

If yes, please submit a copy of the Director's decision letter. If an appeal was made to the Director's decision, please also submit a copy of the Minister's decision letter.

8551E (2017/12)

Page a of 38

D completio n of an Environmen tal Screening Process pursuant to 0.

Reg. 231/08 of the EAA Was the undertaking subje ct of an objection(s)?

D

Yes

D

No

If yes, please submit a copy of the Minister's decis ion letter.

D The proposed undertaking has fulfilled the requirements of the EAA through the completion of an individual Environmental Assessment.

Please submit a copy of the signed Notice of Approval.

Was the undertaking exemp ted from the requirements of the EAA? •

D Yes [Z] No The proposed undertaking has fulfilled the requirements of the EAA through an exemption provided under: Select one of the following

□

sect io n

or

of On tario Regulation No.

DDeclarat ion/Exemp tion Order Number If Regula tion, Declaration Order or Exemption Order does not refer directly to this undertaking, please provide supporting documentation to explain why it applies to this facility Completion Status (3.2 Environmental Assessment Act ( EAA ) R equi reme n ts)

3.3 Consultation/ Notification Indigenous

D Yes [Z] N o D Yes [Z] N o

Consultation: Is the proposed project/activity on Crown land or does/would it alter access to Crown land?• Is the proposed project/activity in an open or forested area where hunting, trapping or plant gathering could occur?• Does the proposed project/activity involve the clearing of forested land? • Could the proposed project/activity impact a water body (e.g., direct discharge) or alter access to a water body? • Could the proposed project/activity impact cultural heritage or archaeological resources, or access to them? •

D Yes D Yes

[Z] N o

D Yes

[Z] N o

D Yes D

[Z] No

[Z] N o

Yes

Is the proposed project/activity adjacent or close to a First Nation Reserve? • Is the applicant aware of any concerns from Indigenous communities about this proposed project/activity? •

[Z] N o

Were there conditions placed, or direction provided, in another (or previous) perm it or approva l for consultation in relation to this project/activ ity?•

D

Based on the online Guide to Apply ing for an Environmental Compliance Approval, or direction provided by the ministry or another agency, are Indigenous consultation activities likely req ui red as part of this application process? •

Yes

[Z] N o

D Yes

[Z] No If Yes to the question above, please describe the consultation/notification activities undertaken for this application or as part of another process (e.g., EAA) in relation to the proposed project/activity, including a summary of the notification/ consultation, First Nation and Melis communities contacted, key issues raised and how they were addressed, any chang es to the project as a result of these activities, and any planned consultation/not ification activities in the future .

8551E (2017/12)

Page 9 of 38

Please attach supporting documents (e.g., record of consultation, delegation letter and/or direction provided by the Crown, materials provided to communities, meeting notes and agendas, correspondence with commun ities as appropriate).

If the applicant has determined that consultation with First Nation and Melis communities is not likely required for the proposed projecUactivity, please provide a rationa le why: * The site is not near any First Nation / Melis communities.

Other Consultation/Noti fication: Has the applicant had a ministry pre-application consultation in relation to the proposed project? •

D Yes 0 No If this application is for a waste disposal site, have the neighbour notification requirements been completed? •

D Yes D No If yes, please attach a Public Consultation/Notification Repo rt that includes the

notice and list of recipients. If no, please select the reason for not undertaking neighbour notificat ion: •

D Application is for an administrative amendment D The proposal was subject to public consultation through an Environmental Assessment process D other , please explain Are there any other consultation/notification activities that have been undertaken to fulfill requirements by other legislation or through voluntary efforts? •

D Yes 0 No If yes, please: 1.

describethe consultation/notification activities below; and

2. attach documents describing each of these consultationlnotification activities, any changes to the project as a result of these activities and any planned consultation/notification activities in the future.

Completion Status (3.3 Consultation/Notification)

8551E (2017/12)

Page 10 of 38

4. Site Information 4.1 Site Address or Storage Location

Will the vehicles or equipment be stored at more than one location?

D

Yes

D

No

(If yes, please enter all vehicle or equipment storage locations below and attach separate list, as necessary.)

D Select if same as Applicant Physical Address Address Type? *

0 Civic Address D Survey Address Primary Civic Address Unit Number Number•

Street

Street Name •

5415

Boun Road

Additional Civic Addresses Unit Number

I

Street Number

I Street

Name

Sepa rate list attached?

D Yes D No Primary Survey Address Enter Lot and Concession or Part and Reference Plan

I Concession

Lot

I Reference

I Part

Plan

Addit ional Survey Address Enter Lot and Concession or Part and Reference Plan

I Concession

Lot

I Reference Plan

I Part

Separate list attached?

D Yes D No Municipality/Unorgan ized Township • York Province/S tate • Ontario County/District

Country * Canada Postal/Zip Code *

M6L2X6

Non-address Information (includes any additional information to clarify the physical location) Geo Reference (required)

D Select if same as Applicant Physical Geo Reference Description of location Southwest corner of property

Map Datum *

NAB83

Zone •

18

Accuracy Estimate *

+/- 10 m

Geo-Referencing Method • Google Earth

UTM Easting • UTM Northing '

465,492.09 5,021,865.49

Physical location of front door or main entrance

NAB83

18

+/- 10 m

Google Earth

465,494.78 5,021,922.97

Completion Status (4.1 Site Address or Storage Location)

Page 11 of 38

85 51E (2017/ 12 )

4.2 Site or Storage Location

Information Site Name * ABCTECHN O

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office * Ottawa District Office

Days and Hours of Operation * 24 hrs/ day, upto 7 days per week Is the site (property) that is the subject of this application owned by the applicant? *

0 Yes D No If no, please include the owner's name, address and a signed document indicating that the applicant has the authority to install and operate the proposed activity, or store vehicles or equipment on the land.

Is the applicant the operating authority of the site that is the subject of this application? • [{] Yes

□

No

If no, please include the operating authority name, address and phone number.

Is the site located in an area of development control as defined by the Niagara Esca rpment Planning and Development Act (NEPDA)? *

D Yes [{] No If yes, please attach a copy of the NEPDA permit for proposed activity.

Is the site within an area covered by the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan? •

□ Yes 0

No

If yes. please attach proof of municipal planning approval for the proposed activity/work (for example, zoning by-law, letter from municipality, etc.).

Completion Status (4.2 Site or Storage Location Information) 4.3 Site Zon ing and Classification

Current Land Use • available.) • Industrial

D NIA Official Plan Designation • Current Zoning (Please attach zoning map, if RH RH - Rural Heavy Industrial Zone

Adjacent Land Use (select all that apply) •

D

Industrial Commercial

0

0

Agricultural

D

D Recreational

D Residential

Other (specify) * Undeveloped, forest

Adjacent Land Zoning * RH[818r], RH(860r] H(18)-h, RU Does the current zoning permit the proposed activity? *

0 Yes D No Does the applicant have correspondence from the municipality to confirm that the current zoning of the property permits the proposed use? •

D Yes 0 No If yes, please attach correspondence from the municipality.

Does the official plan designation support the proposed activity? •

[Z] Yes O No O N/A Completion Status (4.3 Site Zoning and Classification)

8551E (2017/12)

Page 12 of 38

D

4.4 Point of Entry into Ontario N/A (for waste management system vehicles that are stored at an

address outside of Ontario) City in closest proximity to the point of entry Description of Point of Entry Completion Status (4.4 Point of Entry into Ontario) 4.5 Source Protection/Drinking Water Threats (sewage or waste disposal site applications only)

D NIA Check the source protection area(s) where the activity

is/will be located •

D Ausable Bayfield

D

Cataraqui Region

D Central Lake Ontario

D Credit

Valley

D Essex

D

Ganaraska

D Grey Sauble

D

Halton

D Catfish Creek D Cro we Vall ey

D Gra nd Riv er

D Ha milt on

D Kawartha-Haliburton D Lakehead

D Lower Thames Valley D Mississippi Valley

D Northern Bruce Peninsula D Raisin Reg ion

D Sault

Ste. Marie D St Clair Region

D Outs ide a source protection

D Kettle Creek D Lake Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River

D Maitland Valley D Niagara D Nottawasaga Valley D South Nation D Severn Sound D Toronto and Region D Quinte

area

D Long Point D Lower Trent

D Mattagami D North Bay Mattawa

D Rideau Valley

D Sauge en Valley

0 Sudbur y

D Otonabee-Peterborough

D Upper Thames River Is the proposed activity located or planned to be located in a vulnerable area identified in a local assessment report source protection plan under the Clean Water Act, 2006? •

D Yes D No If yes, what is/are the vulnera ble area{s)/zone(s)? •

D Wellhead Protection Areas

D Surface Water Intake Protection Zones D Highly Vulnerable D Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas

Aquifers

Is the activity being applied for identified as a significant drinking water threat in the assessment report for the local source protection area? •

D Yes D No Completion Status (4.5 Source Protection/Drinking Water Threats)

4.6 Receiver of Effluent Discharge (sewage applications only) DNIA Intermediate Receiver Name • Watershed Name • Type of Receiver •

D Surface Water

8551 E (2017/ 12 )

D Groundwater

D Other (specify)•

_

Page 13 of 38

Has the facility received local Conservation Authority clearance? (for stormwater management facility discharging to the natural environment) •

D Yes D No If yes, please include a copy of the Conservation Authority clearance.

Final Receivers

D N/A

Will the proposed activity discharge sewage to any of the following critical receivers? •

D Lake Simcoe D Great Lakes D Other (s p ec i fy) •

D Ride au River D Rouge River

D Detroit River D Bay of Quinte

Is the receiver a Policy 2 receiver? •

D Yes D No Does the applicant have a Policy 2 deviation approval from the directors? •

D Yes D No If yes, please attach a copy of the Director's approva l.

Completion Status (4.6 Rece iver of Effluent Discharge)

Page 14 of 38

8551E (2017/12)

5. Facility Information 5.1 Air N ote•• - If the application does not have air emissions please

Information

proceed to Section 5.2

5.1.1 Summary of Equipment that Discharges Contaminants to the Air

Select Type of Equ ipment •

Number of Pieces of Equipment •

[] Combu stion equipment that uses natural gas, propan e,

no. 2 oil, la ndfil l gas or sewage treatment gas for fuel for the purpose of providing comfort heating or emergency power, produc ing hot water or steam , or hea tin g material in a system that does not discharge to the atmosphe re (Total Heat input of all units: ,; 50,000,000 kJ/hr)

[] Storage tanks

D We lding ope ratio ns that use a maxim um of 10 kilograms of weld ing rod per hour D Comb ustion equ ip me nt that uses waste-derived fuel for the purpose of providing comfort

N/A

N/A N/A

heating, burning ,; 15 litres per hour

D Hea t clean ing ovens used for parts cleaning and associated parts washers or degreasing equipment, other than solvent degreasi ng equipment

□

Cooling towers

[ ] Equipment used to control emissions of contam inants, other than a fume incinerator

□ X □

La borato ry fume hoods Paint spray booths and associated equipment that have a design capacity of up to 8 litres per hour of paint Gra in dryers

1

[Z]

Any other equipment not listed above with a fiow rate of less than or equal to 1.5 m3 /second

2

D Any other equipment not listed above with a fiow rate of greater than 1.5 m /secon d 3

□

Equipment that is subject to an Environme ntal Compliance Approva l, and from which there is no proposed increase in the discharge of any contam inant that was previously rev iewed by the Directo r.

N/A

Completion Status (5.1.1 Summary of Equipment that Discharges Contaminants to the Air)

5.1.2 Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report Is the review of an existing, approved ESDM required as part of this proposed application? •

D Yes [Z] No I f yes, identify the num ber of em ission sources described in the existing ESDM Report that emit contaminants in common with the sources forming the subject of the application (if none, enter zero).

Have all of these emission sources been described in an ESDM Report that was previous ly reviewed as part of an application for an existing Environmental Compliance Approval? •

D Yes [Z] No Comp let ion Status (5.1.2 ESDM Report)

8551E (2017/12)

Page 15 of 38

5.1.3 0. Reg. 419/05 Requirements Which of the following sections of 0. Reg. 419/05 applies to the facility? *

D s.19 (Schedule 2)

0

s. 20 (Schedule 3)

D Does not apply. Please indicate reason Has an instrument under 0 . Reg. 419/05 been issued? •

D

Yes

0

No

If yes, what type(s) of instru ments (including any notices, orders or approvals) has (have) been issued? (select all that apply)

D ss. 4(2) Adjacent Properties D ss. 8(2) Negligible Sources D ss. 11(2) Refined Emission Rates D ss. 13(1) Meteorological Data

D ss.

20(4) Speed-up Request

D s. 35 Site-specific

D ss. 7(1) Specified Dispersion Models D ss. 10(2) Operating Conditions D ss. 13.1 Value of Dispersion Modeling Parameters D ss . 14 (6) Area of Modelling Coverage D ss. 20(5) Speed-up Order D ss. 35(14) Site-specific Standard Order

D ss. 39(4) Technical Standard Registration

Standard

D ss. 39(3) Technical Standard Registration

(Equipment Standard)

(Industry Standard)

D Other (list all that have been issued) Is an instrument under 0. Reg. 419/05 being requested as part of this application? •

D

Yes

0

No

If yes, what type(s) of notice, order or approval is (are) being requested?

D ss. 7(1) Specified Dispersion Models

D ss. 8(2) Negligible Sources

D ss. 10(2) Operating

D ss. 11(2) Refined Emission Rates

Conditions

D ss. 13(1)

Meteorologica l Data

D ss.

20(4) Speed-up Request

D ss. 39(1)(a) App lication for Techn ical Standard Registration (Industry Standard)

D ss. 14(6) Area of Modelling Coverage D s. 32 Request for a Site-specific Standard Order

D ss. 39(1)(b) Application for Technical Standard Registration (Equipment Standard)

D Other (list all that have been issued) Please attach the form(s) requesting the notice(s) and/or order(s) and any additional supporting information.

Has an s. 30 Upper Risk Threshold (Schedule 6) been exceeded? *

D

Yes

0

No

If yes, please include additional supporting information.

Is the facility located in a multi-tenant building? •

D Yes G'.] No If yes, additio nal information may be requested.

Are all of the contaminants to which the application relates represented in the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change publication titled "Summary of Standard s and Gu ide lines to support Ontario Reg ulation 419: Air Pollution- Local Air Quality' or have they been screened out based on the publication titled " Jurisdictional Screening Level (JSL) List, A Screening Tool for Ontario Regulation 419: Air Pollution - Local Air Quality"? •

0 Yes D No (If no, please attac h Supporting Information for a Maximum Ground Level Concentration Acceptability Request for Compounds with no Ministry POI Limit - Supplement to Application for Approval, EPA S. 9).

8551 E (20 17/ 12 )

Page 16 of 38

Completion Status (5.1.3 0 . Reg. 419/05 Requirements) Completion Status (5.1 Air) 5.2 Noise

Note- - If the application does not have noise emissionsplease proceed to Section 5.3

5.2.1 Noise Assessment I Information I Has an Acoustic Assessment Report (AAR) been completed in relation to the proposed project/activity? * [{] Yes

□ No

If yes, please attach the Acoustic Assessment Report Does the AAR show that applicable limits are met? •

0 Yes D No If no, please attach the Acoustic Assessment Report including the Noise Abatement Action Plan If no, is the application eligible for Primary or Secondary Noise Screening? •

□ Yes □ No

Note that if the proposed activity is not eligible for either of the screenings, an AAR must be submitted.

If yes, is the proposed activity eligible for the Primary Noise Screening? *

□Yes □No

If yes, is the actual separation distance between the facility and the nearest noise sensitive point of reception (POR) greater than the minimum required separation distance calculated from the Primary Noise Screening? •

□ Yes □No

If yes, please attach the Primary Noise Screening form and supporting documentation.

Note that if the Primary Noise Screening is not successful then the applicant may attempt to proceed with the Secondary Noise Screening.

If no, does the Secondary Noise Screening Form show that the applicable sound level limits are met? *

□Yes □No

If yes, please attach the Secondary Noise Screening Form and supporting documentation.

Note that if meeting the applicable sound level limits cannot be demonstrated, then an AAR must be submitted.

Completion Status (5.2.1 Noise Assessment)

8551E (2017 /12)

Page 17 of38

5.2.2 Equipment Subject to Noise Review Not considered in this academic study Description •

□ Arc Furnaces 0

Asphalt Plants

□ □ Co-Generation Facilities Blow-down Devices

0

Crushing Operations

□ Flares Gas Turbines □ □ 1.25 kilopascals} Pressure Blowers or Large Induced Draft Fans (flow rate > 47 m'/second or static pressure other equipment not listed above that has not previously been reviewed by the D □ Any connection with an application for an Environmental Compliance Approval with respect to facility

□

Any other equipment not listed above that is identical to equipment for which a noise assessment was previously reviewed by the Director in connection with an application for an Environmental Compliance Approval with respect to the facility

Completion Status (5.2.2 EquipmentSubject to Noise Review) Completion Status (5.2 Noise) 5.3 Sewage Works

I I n formation I

Note•• - If the application does not contain Sewage Works please proceed to Section 5.4 5.3.1 Facility Type - Sewage Works Select the type of facility that is the subject of the application (select all that apply). •

D

Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

D Stormwater

Management Facility

For the following, the applicant must complete and attach the relevant sections of the pipe data form:

D D

Storm Sewers Force mains

D D

Sanitary Sewers

D Combined Sewers D Pumping Station

D

Secondary

D

Ditches

Sewage Treatment Plant Details

D

Primary

D Receives septage

Tertiary

D Constructed/Engineered Wetlands D On-site system

D Lagoons (check all that apply below) *

D Sep tage D Municipal D Other (specify)• Facility Type *

D Municipal or private facility Category: * D New D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 Please indicate the maximum design capacity of the municipal or private sewage treatment plant: •

D s 4,500 m3/day

D > 4,500 m3/day

D Facility for the treatment of leachate Category: * D New D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 8551E (2017/12)

Page 18 of38

DFacility for the treatment of industrial process wastewa ter Category:• D New D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 D Facility for the disposal of non-contact cooling water

D Subsurface disposal Please indicate the design capacity of the subsurface disposal:•

D,;

15m3/day D > 15 m3/day and< 50 m3/day

D > 50 m /day 3

Stormwater Management Facility Details Category:•

D New D 1 D 2 D 3 D 4 Pond Type • D Wet Pond D Dry Pond D

Other (specify)• What

is the drainage area (in hectares) associated with the proposed activity? •

_

Does the applicant own all, or part of the drainage area? •

D Applicant owns all of

D

the drainage area Applicant owns part of the

D

□ □

drainage area Applicant does not own the drainage area For the drainage area land that the applicant does not own, does the applicant have an agreement with the owner(s) of the drainage area? • Yes

No

What is the predominant type of land use in the drainage area? •

D Rural or Agricultural

D

Commercial or Industrial

D Residential Is a Hydrogeological Assessment required? •

D Yes D No (If yes, please attach the hydrogeological assessment.)

Is a review of effluent criteria assessment for stormwatermanagement, cooling water or soil remediation facilities required? •

D Yes D No (If yes, please attach the final effluent criteria accepted by the Regional Office of the Ministry.)

Is a review of effluent criteria assessment for municipal or private sewage, industrial process wastewater or leachate treatment plant required? •

□ Yes

D No

(If yes, please attach the final effluent criteria accepted by the Regional Office of the Ministry.)

Note: The Hydrogeological Assessment , effluent criteria, and surface water assessment must be discussedand prepared with the Ministry's regional technical support section during a pre-application meeting(s) and consultation(s) with the Ministry. A proof of concurrence from technical support must be included as part of the ECA application package.

Completion Status (5.3.1 Facility Type - Sewage Works) 5.3.2 Servicing The works will provide sewage servicing for (select all that apply): •

D• D Subdivision

D other

(s p ec i fy) •

D Condominium -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

D Institutional -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Is there a Municipal Responsibility Agreement in place? • Page 19 of 38

8551E (20 17/ 12)

0 Yes O No O N/A (If yes, please attach a copy of the Municipal Responsibility Agreement.)

D Commercial Commercial Type •

D Hotel, Motel, Inn

D Campground, Park

D

D Shopping

Resort

D Rental Cabins D Restaurant

Malls

D Highway Service Station/Gas Bars D Other (specify) * Comp letion Status (5.3.2 Servicing) 5.3.3 Sewage Servicing for Waste Disposal/Land fill Sites Does/Will the sewage treatment facility receive waste disposal/landfill site leachate? •

D Yes D No If yes, please identify the site(s) below.

Name of Site Contributing Leachate •

Envi Complia

Completion Status (5.3.3 Sewage Servicing for Waste Disposal/Landfill Sites) Completion Status (5.3 Sewage Works) 5.4 Waste Disposal Site

Note** - If the application is not for a waste disposal or processing site please proceed to Section 5.5 5.4.1 Facility Description - Waste Disposal Site (information on the nature of the proposed business or activity at this site) Service Area •

Total Area

of Site (hectares) • Monitoring (select all that apply) •

D Surface

D Landfill Gas

Water

D Groundwater

D None

D Leachate D

Other (s p e ci fy) • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Type(s) of waste to be accepted at this site (select all that apply) • Subjec t: Non-subject:

D Hazardous Waste D Liquid Industrial

D Municipal (non-hazardous) D Other Liquid Waste

Waste Municipal waste categories to be accepted at this site (select all that apply) •

D All Categories

D Contaminated Soil

D IC & I Sources D Leaf and Yard

D Source Separated

8551E (2017/ 12 )

fy) •

D Tires D Blue Box Materials

Organics

D Wood Waste

Waste

D Other (s p ec i

D Domestic Sources

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Page 20 of 38

-

-

Other liquid waste categories to be accepted at this site (select all that apply) •

D Processed Organics

D Hauled Sewage D Other (specify)•

D Waste from Food Processing/Preparation Operations Hazardous Waste/ Liquid Industrial Waste Class Code •

Class Code

Class Code

Class Code

Completion Status (5.4.1 Facility Description - Waste Disposal Site) 5.4.2 Waste Transfer/Processing/Composting - Complete this information if waste transfer and/or processing and/or composting take(s) place at this facility Waste Type to be Transferred or Processed •

D Hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste Design Capacity •

D ,,; 100 tonnes per day D > 100 tonnes per day D Waste other than hazardous waste and liquid industrial waste Design Capacity •

D ,,; 100 tonnes per day

D > 100 tonnes per day

Change to Operations •

D No Change Proposed D Change does not require fundamental design review D Change requires fundamental design review Liquid Waste Maximum Storag e Capacity (m') Hazardous •

Liquid Industrial •

Other

Liquid Waste• Maximum Residual for Final Hazardous Disposal (m') Daily •

Annually •

Liquid Industrial Waste Daily Annually• •

Solid Waste Maximum Storage Capacity (tonnes) Hazardous•

I

Non-Hazardou•s Maximum Residual for Final Disposal (tonnes) Hazardous Non-hazardous Daily *

Annua lly •

Daily *

Maximum Amount of Waste to be Received Daily

Annually •

Other Liquid Waste Daily •Annually •

Class Code

Liquid Industrial •

Solid (tonnes) Other Liquid Waste•Hazardous •

Non-hazardous •

Page 21 of 38 8551 E (2017/12)

Liquid (m' ) Hazardous •

Completion Status (5.4.2 Waste Transfer/Processing/Compostnig)

5.4.3 Thermal Treatment Facility - Complete this information if thermal treatment takes place at this facility Waste Type for Thermal Treatment•

D Hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste Design Capacity •

D s 100 tonnes per day

D > 100 tonnes per day

D Waste other than hazardous waste and liquid industrial waste Design Capacity •

D s 100 tonnes per day

D > 100 tonnes per day

Change to Operations •

D No Change Proposed D Change does not require fundamental design review

D Change requires fundamental design review Liquid Waste Maximum Storage Capacity (m') Hazardous• Liquid Industrial • Other Liquid Waste• Hazardous Liquid Industrial Maximum ResidualAnnually for Final Disposal Waste (m3) Daily' Daily' •

Other Liquid Waste Annually •

Daily•Annually •

3)

( m s• d ou ui Liq zard Ha

d ui Liq • st du In l ria he Ot d ui iq rL ) es • nn (to ous lid rd So aza •H te as W s ou rd za ha nNo •

Solid Waste Maximum Storage Capacity (tonnes) Hazardous•

I

Non-Hazardou•s Maximum Residual for Final Disposal (tonnes) Hazardous

Non-hazardous

Daily'

Daily'

Annually •

Annually •

Maximum Amount of Waste to be Received Daily Maximum Daily Feed Rate (tonneslm' ) Hazardous Waste (tonnes) •

Non-hazardous Waste (tonnes) • Liquid Industrial Waste (m3)•

Completion Status (5.4.3 Thermal Treatment Facility) 5.4.4 Landfill Site - Complete this information if this facility operates as a landfill site Waste Types to be accepted at the Landfill •

D Hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste Design Capacity •

□ S40,000

m3

D > 40,000 m3 s 3 million m3 D > 3 million m3

Other Liquid Waste (m3 )•

D Waste is only uncontaminated tree stumps, leaves, branches, concrete and rocks 8551E (2017/12)

Page 22 of 38

Design Capacity •

D

D S40,000 m

D > 40,000 m' s 3 million m' D > 3 million m'

3

Waste other than hazardous waste and liquid industrial waste, other than uncontaminated tree stumps, leaves, branches, concrete and rocks.

Design Capacity •

D S40,000 m

3

D > 40,000 m' s 3 million m' D > 3 million m'

Change to Operations •

D No Change Proposed

D Change does not require fundamental design review or hydrogeo logical assessment

D Change requires fundamentaldesign review or hydrogeological assessment Note: The Hydrogeo logical Assessment , effluent criteria, and surface water assessment must be discussed and prepared with the Ministry's regional technical support section during a pre-application meeting(s) and consultation(s) with the Ministry. A proof of concurrence from technical support must be included as part of the ECA application package.

Maximum Landfilling Capacity (m') Hazardous Waste •

Non-hazardous Waste •

Liquid Industrial Waste •

Maximum Amount of Waste to be Received Hazardous Waste (tonnes) Non-hazardous Waste (tonnes) Liquid Industrial Waste (m')

Other Liquid Waste •

Other Liquid Waste (m')

Daily •Annually •Daily •Annually •Daily•Annually •Daily •Annually • Landfill Information Area to be Landfilled (hectares) •

Total Site Area including Bufer Area (hectares) •

Estimated Date of Closure (yyyy/mm/dd) •

Population Served

Control Types (select all that apply) •

D Leachate Collected and Treated

D Leachate Collected and Treated On-site

Off-site

D Landfill Gas Collected for Energy Generation

D Landfill Gas Collected and Flared D Other (specify)• Completion Status (5.4.4 Landfill Site) Completion Status (5.4 Waste Disposal Site)

5.5 Waste Management Systems (Except Mobile Waste Processing)

Note••- If the application is not for a waste management system please proceed to Section 5.7.

5.5.1 Fleet List (all vehicles and equipment to be used in the operation of the Waste Management System) Year • M ake • Model • Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) • License Plate Number • Province/State • Separate list attached?

□ Yes □No

Completion Status (5.5.1 Fleet List)

85 5 1E (20 17/ 12)

Page 23 of 38

5.5.2 Vehicle Information Are all the vehicles to be used owned by the applicant? *

D Yes

D

No

If no, please include additional information about ownership arrangements for each vehicle not owned by the applicant.

Has a minimum of $1,000,000.00 liability insurance been obtained for all vehicles for which it is required? •

D

D

Yes

No

Describe any additional insurances that are held (for example, environme ntal impairment liability insurance).

Completion Status (5.5.2 Vehicle Information) 5.5.3 General Waste Management System Type(s) of Waste to be Transported by the General Waste Management System (select all that apply) * Subject:

Non-subject:

D Hazardous

D Municipal (non-hazardous)

Waste

D Liquid Industrial Waste

D Other Liquid Waste

Non-subject Categories to be Transported by the General Waste Management System(selectall that apply) •

D Blue Box Materials

D Domestic Sources

D Commercial D LeafN ard Waste

D Spill Cleanup Material D Tires

D Waste Wash Water D Waste from Food Processing/ Preparation Operations

D Processed Organics (not for land application)

D Non-Hazardou s Solid Industrial D Wood Waste D Contaminated Soil D Asbest os Waste in Bulk D Grease Trap Waste D Dewatered Catch Basin Clean-out Material D Other (specify)•

_

Subject Waste Categories to be Transported by the General Waste Management System Hazardous Waste/ Liquid Industrial Waste Class Code •

Class Code

Class Code

Class Code

Class Code

Separate list attached?

D Yes D No D All drivers are/will be trained in accordance with 0. Reg. 347 and all pertinent environmental legislation.

D Each vehicle used to transport a specific subject waste class is suitable for that waste transportationin order to protect the health and safety of the public and the natural environment.

Note: For transporters of pathological waste and PCBs (waste classes 243 and 312) Operations Manual and Driver Training Manual must also be attached and Financial Assurance must be provided.

General Waste Management System - Disposal Site Information What is the Final Destination of Waste to be Transported by the General Waste Management System? (select all that apply) •

D A disposal site in Ontario approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change

D Disposal sites outside of Ontario approved by another regulatory agency List the destination province(s)/state(s) 8551 E (20 17/ 12 )

Page 24 of 38

Prov ince/State •

Province/State

Province/State

Province/State

Completion Status (5.5.3 General Waste Management System) 5.5.4 Soil Conditioner Waste Management System (includes non-agricultural source material (NASM) that is waste and processed organic waste (biosolids) destined for land application only) Has the applicant received recommendation from Biosolids Utilization Committee (BUC) for land application of processed organic waste (biosolids) or NASM? •

D Yes If yes, please provide a copy of the BUC recommendation.

D No

If no, please clarify •

Spreading equipment (land application only) Equipment Type

Make and Model

Description

Separate list attached?

D

D

Yes

No

Method of system operation (land application only) Estimated quantity to be handled on an annual basis (cubic metres/litres/tonnes) •

Please describe the loading procedures: •

Please describe the spreading methods: •

Please describe the storage facilities (tanks, lagoons, etc.): •

Soil Conditione r Waste Management System - Land App licatio n Sites What is the final destination of waste to be transported by the soil conditioner waste management system? (must include for land application only) •

D Non-agricultural land

D Agricultural land

D Both agricu ltural and non-

agricultural land Completion Status (5.5.4 Soil Conditioner Waste Management System) 5.5.5

Hauled Sewage (Septage) Waste Management System

D Holding tank waste

Type(s) of hauled sewage (septage) to be transported •

D Portable toilet waste

D Septic tank waste

D Other (s p ec i

fy) • ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Spreading equipment (land application only) Equipment Type

Make and Model

Description

Separate list attached?

D

Yes

D

No

Does this system include in-transit storage? • Page 25 of 38

8551E (2017/12)

□ Yes

0

No

If yes: a) What is the duration of storage? Please specify (Max imum period of in-transit storage should not exceed more than two weeks): •

b) Is the storage tank a prefabricated lank with the capacity< 100,000 L, designed and constructed in accordance with a Class 5 Sewage System under the Ontario Building Code or CAN/CSA B66-05? •

D Yes D No If no, please provide a copy of the design of the storage tank signed and dated by a professional engineer.

Does this system include in-transit processing? •

D Y e s

D N o If y e

s : a) Location of in-transit processing: •

D In Vehicle D In-storage Tank b) Describe the method of in-transit processing: •

Does this system use barge/boat to transport hauled sewage (septage)? •

□ Yes

D No

If yes: a) Has a minimum of $1,000,000.00 liability insurance been obtained for the barge/boat for which it is required? •

D Yes D No b) Does the barge/boat have an engine of 10 horsepower (hp) or more, for which a commercial vessel license is required from TransportCanada? •

D Yes D No If yes, please include a copy of the commercial vessel license.

Note: For in-transit storage or processing the applicant must include with the application the consent of the landowner, if the landowner is different than the applicant. A financial assurance estimate must be provided by applicants using in-transit storage or using in-transit processing where processing is conducted in the in-transit storage tanks.

Hauled Sewage (Septage) Waste Management System - Land Application Sites

D N/A

List the Environmental Compliance Approval Number(s) of all disposal site(s) approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change for land application of hauled sewage in association with this waste management system.

Approval or Application Date Instrument Type Instrument Number (yyyy/mm/dd)

Completion Status (5.5.5 Hauled Sewage (Septage) Waste Management System) Completion Status (5.5 Waste Management Systems (Except Mobile Waste Processi ng)) 5.6 Waste Management System - Mobile Waste Processing

Note**· If the application is not for the use and operation of mobile waste processing equipment, proceed to Section 5.7

8551E (2017/12)

Page 26 of 38

5.6.1 Mobile Waste Management System Process and Equipment Description Type(s) of Waste to be Processed (select all that apply) • Subjec t:

Non-subject:

D Hazardous Waste

D Municipal (non-hazardous)

D Liquid Indu strial Waste

D Other Liquid Waste

Type of Waste to be Processed by the Unit(s)

Number of Units •

Financial Assurance (per unit) Financial Assurance Required

Non-hazardous Solid Waste

$5 ,000

Hazardous Waste

$20,000

Liquid Industrial Waste

$20,000

Other Liquid Waste

$20,000

Multiple Types of Waste from the Categories Above

$20,000 Total Financial Assurance

Municipal (non-hazardous) Waste Categories to be Processed (select all that apply) •

D Contaminated Soil at Cleanup Site

D Wood Waste

D Construction and Demolition Waste

D Asbestos Waste

D

D Domestic Waste

D Other

Tires

(specify) •

0ther Liquid Waste Categories to be Processed (select all that apply) •

D Hauled Sewage

D Waste from Food Processing/Preparation Operations

D Processed Organic

D Other (specify)• Hazardous I Liquid Industrial Waste Types to be Processed

Class Code •

Class Code

Class Code

Class Code

Class Code

Completion Status (5.6.1 Mobile Waste Management System Process and Equipment Description) 5.6.2 Equipment Information - Please attach a separate list if more space is required.

Equipment List Unit No. •

Unit Type •

Process Description • Equipment Type •

Make •

Model •

Serial Number •

Equipment Capacity (including un it of measurement) •

Separate list attached?

□ Yes D No

Completion Status (5.6.2 Equipment Information) Completion Status (5.6 Waste Management System - Mobile Waste Processing) 5.7 Cleanup of Contaminated Sites

Note•• - If the application is not for a cleanup of a contaminated site please proceed to Section 6.

Type of Cleanup •

D

In-situ

D

Ex-situ

□ Both

Contaminated media to be treated: 85 51E (20 17/ 12)

Page 27 of 38

D Groundwater

D

Surface water

D Sediment

□

Soil Waste Type • Subject:

Non-subject:

D Hazardous Waste D Liquid Industrial Waste

D Municipal (non-hazardous) D Other Liquid

Waste Type of discharge

□ Air

D

Groundwater

D

Storm or sanitary

D

Surface water

D Noise Completion Status (5.7 Cleanup of Contaminated Sites)

8551E (2017/12)

Page 28 of 38

6. Supporting Documentation and Technical Requirements 6.1 General

This is a list of supporting information to this application and is subject to the FIPPA and EBR. Required, If no, provide explanation, (include Optional referenced attachment if more space is Attachment Attached? orN/A required for rationale) Proof of legal name

Required

[Z)Yes

□

No

Enhanced EBR description

N/A

Yes

No

Provincial Officer Notice

N/A

Yes

No

Inspection Report Detailed project and process description

N/A Requi red

Pre-application Consultation Record

N/A

Legal Survey(s)

N/A

Site Plan(s) Scaled area location plan(s) with geo- referencing points identified Documentaiton in support of EBR Exception Proof of Compliance with EAA Requirements

Requi re d

□

No No

N/A N/A

0

□ □ □

0

□ □

Yes

No

Yes

No

(Z]Yes

No

0

No

0

□ □ □ □ □

Required (Z]Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

N/A

Yes

No

Optiona l

Yes

No

Proof of Consultation/Notification Financial Assurance Estimate

Yes (Z]Yes

Confident ial

Name, address and consent of land/ site owner for the installation and operation of the proposed activity or storage location of equipment or vehicle

N/A

□ □

Name, address and phone number of the Operating Authority

N/A

□

Yes

No

□

□ □ □ □ □

Yes

No

□ □ □ □ 0 □ □

Application Fee

Required

(Z]Yes

No

0

A copy of this application has been sent to the Ministry Local District Office

Required

(Z]Yes

□

No

0

Optiona l

□

□

No

Copy of NEPDA Permit

N/A

Copy/Proof of Municipal Planning Approval (ORMCA, general)

N/A

Municipal Zoning Confirmation Letter

N/A

Zoning map

Yes

□

Yes

Yes Yes

□

N/A

Director's approval for Policy 2 Deviation

N/A

Other (please describe)

No

No

No

Requi red [Z]Yes

Conservation Authority Clearance

No

No

Yes

No

□ □

Yes

□

Completion Status (6.1 General)

85 51E (2017/1 2)

Page 29 of 38

6.2 Air

Attachment

Req uired, Optional orN/A

Attached?

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confidential

Emission Summary and Dispersion Modelling (ESDM) Report prepared in Required @ Yes accordance with s. 22 and of 0 . Reg. 419/05 (including signed checklist)

□No

0

Electronic copy of the Dispersion Modelling input and output files prepared in accordance with s. 26 of 0 . Reg. 419105

□No

□

Requi red @ Yes

Supporting Information for a Maximum Ground Level Concentration Acceptability Request for Compounds with no Ministry POI Limit - Supplement to Application for Approval, EPA S. 9

NIA

□Yes □No

□

Copies of forms requesting 0. Reg. 419/05 instruments and supporting documentation

N/A

□Yes □No

□

Optiona l

□Yes □No

□

Req uired, Optional orN/A

Attached?

Other (please describe)

Completion Status (6.2 Air) 6.3 Noise and Vibration

Attachment

Primary Noise Screening

N/A

Secondary Noise Screening

N/A

Acoustic Assessment Report including signed checklist (AAR)

Requi red

□Yes □No Yes

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

No

@ Yes

□No

Con fidential

□ □ 0

Vibration Assessment Report

N/A

Yes

No

Noise Abatemen t Action Plan

N/A

Yes

No

□ □

□Yes □No

□

Other (please describe) Optiona l

Completion Status (6.3 Noise and Vibration) 6.4 Sewage Works

Attachment

Signed Municipal Responsibility Agreement Detailed description of the proposed activities/works Notice of Completion for the Environmental Study Report (ESR) 8551 E (2017/ 12 )

Required, Optional orN/A N/A N/A Optiona l

Attached?

□Yes □No □Yes □No □Yes □ No

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confident ial

□ □ □ Page 30 of 38

Attachment

Required, Optional or N/A

N/A

Design Brief Preliminary Engineering Report

Optiona l

N/A

Attached?

□Yes □No Yes

No

Yes

No

Final Plans Engineering Drawings and Specifications Sewage quantity and quality characteristics

N/A

Stormwater Management Report

N/A

Yes

No

Stormwater Management Plan

N/A

Yes

No

Hydrogeological Assessment with proof of concurrence from the Ministry's Regional technical support section

N/A

Environmental Impact Analysis

N/A

Optiona l

Final effluent criteria accepted with proof of concurrence from the Ministry's Regional Technical Support Section Sewage Works Limited Operational Flexibility Requirements - Engineer's Report Sewage Works Limited Operational Flexibility Requirements - Declarations

N/A

N/A N/A N/A

Pipe Design Data Form Other (please describe)

Optiona l

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

□Yes □No □Yes □No □Yes □No

Confident ial

□ □ □ □ □ □ □

No

□ □

□Yes □No

□

□Yes □Yes □Yes □Yes

□No □No □No

□ □ □

□No

□

Yes

Completion Status (6.4 Sewage) 6.5 Waste Disposal Sites

Attachment Design and Operations Report Stormwater Management Report Hydrogeological Assessmen t with proof of concurrence from the Ministry's Regional technical support section Assessmentof Physicaland Water Use Conditions Waste Limited Operational Flexibility Requ irements - Engineer's Report Waste Limited Operational Flexibility Requirements - Declarations Copy of notification to adjacent landowners

8 55 1E (2017/ 12 )

Required, Optional orN/A N/A Optiona l

N/A Optiona l

N/A NIA N/A

Attached?

□Yes □No Yes

No

□Yes □No □Yes □Yes □Yes □Yes

□No □No □No □No

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confident ial

□ □ □ □ □ □ □ Page 31 of 38

Attachment

Required, Optional orN/A

Attached?

Optiona l

□Yes □No

Other (please describe)

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confident ial

□

Completion Status (6.5 Waste Disposal Sites) 6.6 Waste Management Systems

Required, Optional orN/A

Attachment

NIA

□Yes □No □Yes □No

N/A

□Yes □No

Proof of vehicle and/or equipment ownerships Complete Fleet List (list of all vehicles, trailers and equipment used) Copy of the Liability Insurance for all vehicles for which insurance is required

N/A

Copy of BUG recomme ndation

NIA NIA NIA

Copy of the storage tank design Copy of commercial vehicle licence Description of the physical location where the vehicles transporting biomedical waste are being disinfected

Optiona l

Drivers Training Manual (for PCB/ Biomedical Waste) A copy of the applicant's Operation Plan including detailed packaging and biomedical waste handling methods Contingency and Emergency Procedures Plan (for PCB/ Biomedical Waste/Hauled Sewage (Septage)) Other (please describe)

Attached?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confident ial

□ □ □ □ □ □

□Yes □No

□ □

Optiona l

□Yes □No □Yes □No

Optiona l

□Yes □No

□

Optiona l

□Yes □No

□

Optiona l

□

Completion Status (6.6 Waste Management Syste ms)

Page 32 of 38

85 51E (2017/12)

6.7 Mobile Waste

Processing

0 N/A Req uired, Optional orN/A

Attachment Design and Operations Report Mobile Waste Processing of Genera l Waste

Attached?

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Confidential

N/A

□Yes □No

□

N/A

□Yes □No

□

Optiona l

□Yes □No

□

Design and Operations Report Mobile Waste Processing of Liquid Waste Other (please describe)

Completion Status (6.7 Mobile Waste Processing ) 6.8 Cleanup of Contaminated Sites

Attachment

Design Report for Cleanup of Contaminated Sites

D N/A Required, Optional orN/A N/A

Attached?

□Yes □No

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale)

Con fidential

□

Other (please describe) Optiona l

□Yes □No

□

Completion Status (6.8 Cleanup of Contam inated Sites) 6.9 Other Attachments

□ N/A

Title

Reference

I

Con f

n t ia l

I s there an attachmen t of an additional list of attachments?

D Yes

□ No

If there is not enough space to list all of the attachments included in this application package, please include an additiona l listing of these attachments.

Completion Status (6.9 Other Attachments) 6.10 Confidentiality

Attachment

Explanation for confidentiality

Req uired, Optional orN/A Requi red

Attached?

□Yes

[Z]No

If no, provide explanation, (include referenced attachment if more space is required for rationale) As per client's request

Confidential

□

Completion Status (6.10 Confidentiality) Please note: The collection of personal information in this application is necessary to administer the Ministry's approvals program, which is authorized pursuant to the Environmental Protection Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act. The personal information collected in this application will be used to administer the program, including for the purposes of the Ministry's compliance and enforcement activities under the aforementioned acts, and for the purposes of making information in respec t of Environmental Compliance Approvals available to the public with the exception of payment information. Questions about the collection of the information can be directed lo a Client Service Representat ive, Client Services and Permissions Branch, 135 St. Clair Avenue West, 1st Floor, Toronto ON M4V 1PS; Te lephone outside Toronto 1-800-461-6290or in Toronto 416-3148001 or Fax 416-314-8452.

8551 E (20 17/ 12 )

Page 33 of 38

.$ _ ili.mtnt ,_ 'fect,i, co,,

,

Technical Contact I have been authorized by the applicant to prepare the technical materials for the area(s) of responsibility identified in section 2.6 that are included in the application. I have reviewed those technical materials and I have made all inquiries that are necessary to declare to the best of my knowledge, information and belief: The technical materials contained in this application in respect of the area(s) of responsibility identified in section 2.6 are complete and accurate.

I have the relevant education and experience necessary to provide this certification.

Name of Technical Contact (Please print) • Cody Candassie Date (yyyylmm/dd) Completion Status (7.3 Statement of Technical Contacts)

8551E (2017/12)

202104/30

Page 35 of 38

8. Payment Information - Application for an Environmental Compliance Approval Please Note: 1.

If this form has been completed by hand, the fee calculations must be completed and attached separately.

The supplemental fee calculations do not need to be included if this form has been completed electronically.

2. If this form has been completed electronically, the fees for this application have been calculated based on the information provided. The Ministry may require additional information during the review of the application that could impact the total fee required.

All fees should be paid in Canadian funds, payable to the Minister of Finance, except fees for Transfer of Review, which are payable to the local municipality.

4.

Credit card payments are accepted for payments under $10,000 only. Never email credit card information.

5.

If payment is being made by certified cheque or money order, please staple the payment to this page.

6.

The information collected in this section of the form is considered confidential and will only be used to process the application fee.

7.

To protect credit card information, do not submit this page containing payment information via e-mail or any other electronic means if it includes credit card information. Credit card information should be submitted only by mail, facsimile, or hand-delivery. Applications containing payment informationthat are submitted via e-mail or any other electronic means will not be processed and will be destroyed.

rd Ca

3.

m Nu r be

rd Ca

er ld Ho 's re tu na Sig ry pi Ex te Da (m

te Da

/y m

ylm

y)

yy (y m d) /d

Do not include this page in the copies of the application that are being provided to the Local Ministry District Office.

Amount Enclosed

Method of Payment *

6,700 D Certified Cheque D Money Order D VISA D MasterCard Credit Card Information (if paying by VISA or MasterCard) Name of Cardholder (Please print)

X

Completion Status (8 Payment Informat ion)

If paying by certified cheque or money order, please attach it here.

85 51 E (2017/12)

Page 36 of 38

Application Summary For Ofice Use Only

ReferenceNumber

I

Payment Received ($) I Date (yyyy/mmldd)I I nitials

Applicant Name ABC Technologies Project Name 1350101 Project Description Executive Summary Supplemental Application Information One copy of the application and supporting documentation has been mailed to the District Manager at the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Ottawa District Office. One hard copy and one electronic copy of this application have been provided to the Client Services and Permissions Branch.

Application Status

85 51E (2017/12 )

Page 37 of 38

Section 1. Application Information

2. Project Informat ion 3. Regulatory Requirements 4. Site Information 5. Facil ity Informat ion

6. Supporting Documentation

Com pleted?

0 0 0 0 0 0

Yes Yes

□

No No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

7. Payment Information

Yes

8. Author iza ti on

Yes

No

[BJ [BJ

No No

Fee Summary Activity Adm inistrative Processin g Review of EPA s. 9 activities Review of EPA s. 27 activities Review of OWRA s. 53 activities Total Fee

Amount ($)

$200 .00 $6,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,7 00 . 00

The Ministry may request additional fees upon review of this application.

If this form is submitted in print version only and the smart calculation feature is not used, please attach the fee calculation separately.

85 51E (20 17/

APPENDIX G SCREENVIEW MODELLING DATA OF SIGNIFICANT CONTAMINANTS

Crystalline Silica modelling Data

Ethyl Modelling Data

Triethlanonane Modelling Data

Iron Modelling Data