Sacred in the Mundane

Sacred in the

Mundane Rhode Island School of Design Architectural Master’s Thesis ----Maxwell Dehne

Maxwell Dehne Rhode Island School of Design ----Architectural Master’s Thesis

Special thanks goes to my family, friends, the Wreckage Brothers, and Criticality.

Family: Sheri Fabian Jeanne Heywood Andrea Heywood Tim Dehne Jan Carpenter Doug Russell Lynda Erwin Hussein Al-Biaty Ben Grey Mike Sonatta Ja-Rei Su Dusty Eveland Dewan Jon Tilencio Brothers in the Wreckage: Burgess Voshell Kun Wu Nick Moore Desmond Delanty Ryan McCaffrey Special Thanks: Stan Chesshir Clive Knight Paul Hawkins Zac Burke-Wolfe

Creative Commons License Sacred in the Mundane by Maxwell Dehne is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Jason Wood//Barbara Stehle Thesis Squadron AKA

“They’ll be expecting one of us in the

Wreckage Brothers

1. Ryan McCaffrey 2. Burgess Voshell 3. Desmond Delanty

LUNCHEON

Final Critique Order 4. Nicholas Moore 5. Max Dehne 6. Kun Wu

A Fronte Praecipitium

加油

A Tergo Lupi

Tracked

313

Days Tracked

6

Average hours of sleep

6

Average mood in the morning out of ten

5

Average mood at bedtime out of ten

5

Average creativity out of 10

6

Average Stress: 6 out of 10

116

Most Play Song: Freaks & Geeks by Childish Gambino

115

Paper Cranes Constructed

4104

Pictures Taken

105

Posts to Tumblr

85

Twitter Posts

86

Instagram Posts

Content 14

Mundane or Mundane

18

Empathetic Mundane

26

Aesthetics of the Mundane

38

Re-Contextualize

42

3 Weeks

72

3 Weeks: Installation

80

Mask of our Past

86

017:

96

Sacred in the Mundane

Thesis Abstract

Architecture does not control its inhabitants. It does not dictate, or demand, but instead persuades occupation, persuades perseverance, and allows the mind to find footing admits the fragmental anxiety of life. In the gap between those fragments, between the whole and the detachment, architecture must accept a precarious placement. As purveyors of space architecture is asked to live within the ambiguity set by a profession both ephemerally artistic and empirically definable.

Architecture is the representation of the porous fragmentation of moral, ethical, legal, cultural, and economic factors brought into stasis. This fragmentation allows the places we dwell to become silent actors in the theatrics of the

regularity of our lives. Standing firmly admits this division, between polemics of practice and ethics, architecture has located itself as a purveyor of space that defines more than program or client, but life itself. Through the immutability of the building we are able to define a culture, an era, or a life. It is in response to this that my work attempts to stitch together the intuitive particularity of a character defined by the labor of dwelling.

This creation of labor is to better understand the implications of garnered universal truth by defining space as the regularity of fragmentation and the creation of the whole. My work asks to be inhabited, it must be inhabited so to expose the relationship between the occupant and the fragment.

Mundane or Mundane Design Boards or “DP Boards” are the point of departure for the RISD Thesis. It becomes a first attempt at defining the next ten months. Presented to a small group of faculty we project the future of our projects into a one and half foot wide strip.

Statement It’s eight o’clock. The sound of church bells chime from my phone. I find the screen; slide my finger across the glass and its gone. I’m awake. A room, a station, a home, a place, a city, a country, come into focus. I find my Levis, find my Vans. Black on black.

The wood floors of my apartment are old. Tattered cracked polyurethane bubbled in the corners is scratched from un-shoed chairs pulled across the surface. Just beyond my door, an awning is pulled against City Flower’s tucked under my apartment. The Mr. Sister sign swings slowly to a dull morning breeze and the street moves with the breakfast hungry public. A block down the street, Brickway’s doors are overflowing to the street and the Coffee Exchange deck carries a crowd into caffeinated bliss.

Like a narrative architecture has both the capabilities of fulfilling the mundane or provoking magnificence in our daily routine. It is the context by which the world around us is constructed in a slow procession. Fragments of the city contain in them the latent potential to

Through the use, meaning arrives.

-Rirkrit Tiravanija 14

transfigure our identity over time. The walk home, favorite café, or park to eat lunch carries importance that extends beyond simple pleasure. These places of the mundane are constructs of place and through our experience we develop a language for the world we exist within. In this regard, architecture has the opportunity and the responsibility to consider this interaction and objectively seek to inspire empathy. breathe new life into that which we contextualize through the experience of aesthetic routine Insertions of a new empathetic reality will both expose and augment the mundane. Mundane is defined as both banal and the earthly world around us. It includes those things that pertain to our hands. As such, gravity and the forces of nature that hold architectural construction at bay are mundane. Through the exposure and augmentation of the mundane I hope to develop an empathetic architectural understanding that can be used to develop an aesthetic understanding of form, function, and structure.

END

15

1. Building is really dwelling.

2. Dwelling is the manner in which mortals are on the earth.

3. Building as dwelling unfolds into the building that cultivates growing things and the building that erects buildings.

-Martin Heidegger, “Poetry, Language, Thought�

Empathetic Mundane

Introduction It is my insertion that architecture, in response to and in conflict with the mundane is able to manifest magnificence. This is obtainable if designers are able to appropriately pay attention to the details that are formalized as a by-product of “meaning”. Meaning is formed from a rational understanding of form, structure, and beauty. Through this attention, or interest there can be an investigation of the reality, or the real of an object. This separation between architecture and the user allows both to simultaneously obtain a subjective and objective realization that elevates the intricacies of the mundane. This adherence to human “facts (that) reverberate with meanings that run deep into our personal yet common interests” allows for meaning to be divorced from the lofty importance of imposed what is largely experienced through the mundane of the everyday.

A common history manifests itself within and upon the mundane events of our lives and retrieves beauty from the edge of perception when the mundane comes into conflict with context of place. Architecture cannot dispense of the mundane in everyday life, but should reconcile conflicts within routine, regularity, and the datum of life We must peel away space, place, and site from meaning to expose the reality there within.

18

“The surface of the everyday is covered by a surface, that of modernity.”

Henri Lefebvre “The Everyday and Everydayness” It is my conclusion that the everyday (the mundane) is the foundation of architecture as an object defined by human time and bound by the commonality of repetition. This friction with becoming mundane within architectural form places a demand upon designers to engage with this tension and determine its relevance to beauty by exposing or rupturing the surface of modernity. By objectification and repetition the conversation of what and how to approach architecture as either art or craft should be reconciled while conversely rationalized. Delving into meaning and extracting reality that is bound within architecture to expose mundane impositions upon form, structure, and beauty.

Conflicting Definitio When approaching the mundane it is essential that we understand and dissect its meaning. The definition of mundane: “Belonging to the earthly world, as contrasted with heaven; worldly, earthly” “In weakened sense: ordinary, commonplace. Hence: prosaic, dull, humdrum; lacking interest or excitement.”

If we are to hold both definitions as true, then that which is of the earth must be humdrum. The ordinary commonality placed upon that which is earthly or terrestrial precludes that the events that are of the earth lack interest.

Being ordinary and common suggests that these events bound by the earth or earthly are specifically habitual and engage our “lower human nature”.

Tangent: Lower Human Nature When I began to think about lower human nature I am reminded of the platonic separation of the senses and how those related to our animistic nature are “lower senses”. This seems an interesting parallel as mundane relates to our lower nature when you explore its intersection with the earthly and its corresponding definition.

The rupture of modernity demands that we do not take for granted the need for sited particularity. Each thread stitched into a blanket holds itself in place by the

strength of its neighbors. By rupturing this surface we alter the mundane continuance of the fabric and expose new realities. Thus, the mundane allows for upheaval of a new mundane..

It is this relationship to the mundane that events like rain, wind, and sun become perceived as banal, boring, humdrum, in western culture. The terrestrial world, being perceived as down or below foot as opposed to upward or sky bound, frames how we approach the earthly body. Architecture, as a means of protection and inhabitation removes human form from the intrusion of mundane events and places humanity out of reach and in a detached state. Through this relationship architecture creates an internal environment constructed through inhabitation and an external relationship to the terrestrial. Walls, windows, doors, thresholds, columns, and beams restrain the mundane and inversely are enveloped by it.

Placement of human form, in context to the implied banality of the environment, manifests a division between architecture and the natural world. This tension bound within buildings physically denies the entrance of the mundane, but is inversely unable to stop its inclusion there within. I assert that this division between architecture and the mundane is due to the environmental placement of architecture that disrupts and impregnates site with space. This act of imposition is not mundane or humdrum, but violent 19

and intercedes the neutrality of the earthly world. However, as a parasitic inclusion, architecture transforms and mutates space as an inclusive exclusion (objects in space that include earthly elements, thus are utilized to deny there inclusion) physically constructs this violence between earth and architecture (in proxy humanity).

Architecture is the parallel intersection of two forms of the earthly body, one mundane or earthly, and the other human. This separation of humanity from the natural world, from the earthly, does not divorce completely, but does reinforce this parallel tension.

This relationship to the human and to the earth asks architecture to reach beyond its constructed immediacy and enact upon space an ethos that can bridge between definitions. Like sutures across a laceration, architecture can be the location of regional overlap.

As a purely human construction, we have the opportunity to take the many forces of the earthly and include them in our constructed boundaries. When the mundane comes in conflict with humanity, we must utilize its banality as an object of regularity. Through this utilization of the mundane and earthly, architecture of regularity can be expressed as undercurrents of useful meaning.

Empathetic Introductions Our relationships to the mundane builds an empathetic response that is constructed through a shared history of use. The tedium of our daily lives, through micro interactions molds how we construct a greater understanding of place, space, and site.

Place: A space that is the site of an action.

Space: An opening that can be occupied by an action.

Site: The fi ed place of an action.

Architecture, as a shell of socially constructed interactions has the opportunity to guide perception through the accumulation of built language. Walls, windows, doors, are banal elements of

architectural construction that allow an architect to make simple adjustments to the world around us. The reconsidering of formal arrangements in context to the physical environment is a discovery that unearths mundane events, defining use and responding to its presence, allowing the passage of the everyday to be a critical good. As we separate the “meaning” in architecture from the “reality” of architecture we are able to engage with the mundane and its generative parallel tensions.

What is the routine of architectural interaction and is it mundane?

What is empathetic architecture?

What is empathy?

Empathy Empathy as a derivative of ‘em’, a prefix denoting “the placement upon or within” and pathos relating to “the emotional in comparison to the permanent” allows us to approach and connect to subjective matter as an objective through compounded personal perception.

Through this self-referential relationship the empathic response binds object to person, person to person, person to object, by placing upon and within one another an emotional infrastructure.

It is my assertion that empathy, as a placement within and in relationship to architecture animates and articulates the architect’s interested approach to the design of inhabitation. Inhabitation also exposes the mundane and allows for its augmentation as it relates to human emotional connectivity.

Modific tion of the Mundane The following passages are an attempt to alter the reality or the dialogue of what is mundane and what can be beautiful.

The subtleties of everyday life are so rich that to forget them, to ignore them seems to diminish moments of wonder.

We need banality if we are to revel in its inverse. However, I find that in the smallest moments of our lives, if we are able to appreciate them we can see the beauty tied to the mundanity of our lives.

The Door: The door knob in hand is cold. Shaking the handle, it’s locked and the exterior of place is exaggerated as we wish only to be inside. Keys shake from a pocket and there is a short game of hide and seek as the correct key is located on the ring. The familiar sound and sensation of the key sliding into the lock focuses our attention to the handle. Its form and function in perfect harmony. Turning the key in unison with the knob the latch clears the cavity and the door swings open. Taking a step your inside, the door is closed. The comforting security of the latch clicking back into position and the deadlock spun into the locked alignment ends the sequence. Once again, inside, clothed, disengaged from the exterior.

Thus the opening is a dialectic language that allows for transference of embedded locality.

The Stair: We traverse the stair. A step, a riser, a run, a slide of the foot across a surface.

Elevation, rest, rise, step, rise, pattern and repetition of form transform two planes into one. The banality of the tread denotes change of space and time. Sole makes contact, the leg presses foot to floo , and we are lifted. The stair is an instigator for change; it demands we reconcile sequence through elevation and sight. Perspectives of the room move and transfigu e. Here, in the step, in the stairwell, we are able to actively manipulate form.

The Window:

The Floor:

Its transparency leaves the interior exposed, to the exterior. White shades pull to a side, exterior framing sequence; fall, winter, spring playing out like live television. Within the frame the exterior penetrates and illuminates the interior.

Together they play a subtle dance between their respective realities. In front of the window we become participants to an exchange as we mitigate their introversion. Time lapses through this frame, delineation of exposure.

Through our eyes we see the world with new perspective and we are asked to assuage our reality with that of the place we inhabit. The glass, the curtain of transparency is but a fi ter through which a new formation of truth can be determined. A window is a pause in time where the user is affixed to site of possible prophetic experience.

My foot touches the carpet. Its tan fabric is soft, soothing, and reminiscent of my childhood. Thus, in a house nearly two thousand miles from my childhood home I am transported. The carpet, the floo , the elevation of my physical form allows me to balance between both the heavens and the earthly. I am perched, somewhere between here and there, like a scarecrow, the field my home, the stick under arm the floo , and I am able to see from edge to edge. These walls are my walls, those walls are there walls, but both are enveloped by visionary recollections.

The Opening: Exposure illustrates enclosure, as an opening is a fissu e in the body of structure. Architecture forms inhabitation and an opening allows for the reconciliation of interior and exterior. It forces the form to balance, that which is enclosed, and that which is open. Inhabitation of the opening is one of sidedness. Deciding to occupy enclosure or exposure. Inside or out.

The Mantel: Purpose eludes this timber log. History laden protuberance it carries now only the weight of knickknacks and picture frames. Once, so essential it is now but decoration. The mantel above the flame.

Relegated to parody, a well endowed shelf. What of its purpose, what of its form? Why do we ask so little of the mantel when it is worth so much?

Crumbling: The plaster is cracking, shedding like dried elbow skin off the building. Inside the walls are growths. Mold rich drywall is piled in a corner and the studs are bare, the rooms divided now by only bone.

Home has eroded back to space, to mere occupancy. Inhabitation is now only a residual context of an old pot still on the stove.

as objects tied to the surface of the earth.

The routine that is framed by a building enables architects to shift regularity with incremental change.

The Plaza:

Architectural Ritual

The brick underfoot shakes wit my steps. The density is unmistakable. The loose weight of clay resonates through the public square as feet traverse its wet surface. The dull sound of falling water echoes from the fountain below a strategically placed Starbucks. The light rail line hums to a red light and the #12 bus rumbles through a green. Between sips of coffee a couple huddles under an awning, building courage to step into the rain. The cascading brick steps down to the large open plaza where the public cuts the corner between 6th and Broadway.

By exposing the mundane, beautiful utility is brought forth through the language and articulation of their sequential merit. The rituals of architecture and more specifically, that, which are universally true, (openings, windows, steps, floors) must be interrogated to objectively understand their role. It is also of vital importance to determine if these elements can or should be perceived as beautiful in their simplicity.

Architectural Routine Architecture is a ritual of routine.

It reveals destinations bound by our unconscious empathy of place. Doors open, windows slide, shutters close, the foundation rest, lights illuminate.

These are mundane, banal, boring, in most spaces. In some they are brilliant, exalting, inspiring, and elevate the user into a new understanding of the place they inhabit. It is within the everyday that I hope to expose architectural routine as containing embedded beauty and brilliance. Architecture, in its capacity to regulate our lives has an important role

Is a door necessary? Is it merely an opening? What are the essential components of architectural form?

These questions resonate with earthly inhabitation and humanities need for comfort, for security. When we compartmentalize form, function, and beauty we are manifesting our fear of banality and our need to objectify the reality of an object. Stairs there, door there, beautiful lobby there. However, it is my concern that there be a balance of these scaled arms between form, function, and beauty that allows the aggregation of use to be understood as meaningful. That through the utilization of form, structure can be born and through structure beauty can be found and form can be inspired by beauty. The

mun-dane a. Belonging to the earthly world, as contrasted with heaven; worldly, earthly. b. In weakened sense: ordinary, commonplace. Hence: prosaic, dull, humdrum; lacking interest or excitement.

interrelationships of the mundane and the inspirational are manifested through the same lens. Can architecture be seen differently after the first time, the tenth, and the hundredth? When does the extraordinary move into the ordinary? To what level must we understand context to see these abstractions?

If we can understand architectural ritual as universal truth of inhabitation we may be able to tease out a language that can translate previous iterations of the mundane and join them with augmentation and exposure. The opening of the door, the peak through the window, or traversing of the stair are actions, set within the body of architecture that allow a building to transform from object to physicality. It gives life to the inanimate, activating

space as something that can reach farther as a conglomeration of rituals. The beauty of architecture, the understanding of its aesthetic function, allows it to break the bounds of its material state and move us emotionally. We are able to empathetically maneuver through the rituals of architecture and know intuitively the needed occupancy of a space.

We are tactile beings, ones grounded in the physical world around us. We maneuver between empathic, empirical, and physical states of understanding in an attempt to piece together truth for ourselves. Architecture, as an actor in this play, must find ways in which to facilitate this search of truth. Thus architectural ritual, one formulated by routine and adherence of relatable parts must become a realization of the

mundane latent within an action. That as animals constrained to the earth we are intrinsically also bound to the mundane events of our daily lives. Routine, regularity and unoriginality need not be seen as perversions of our individuality, but as commonalities that stitch one another together through a common unconsciousness of constructed interactions. As formal arrangement, architecture has the opportunity to recognize unconscious commons.

Defining these events, architecture should attempt to augment and expose these rituals to the user as moments of mundane revelation. These exposures, as a ritual of habitation, become habits of living and thus become engrained within the context of our lives. If architecture is a construction of the conflict between humanity and nature, then the inclusion of both can allow architecture to define form that manifests beauty in accordance to the convergence between human and natural environments.

Empathetic Architecture As briefly discussed in The Mundane, empathy in architecture is an augmentation upon it as a mundane object. What I mean by this is that empathetic architecture is that space through repetitive use and inclusive acceptance has become place by sharing its useful meaning with those inhabiting its belly. Set within the context of our daily lives, architecture quickly becomes banal, but to this effect we are unconsciously aware of the structures imposing an ethical presence. When placed inside the framework of regularity we share with it a sense of place that animates its existence.

Through this connection to the mundane, regular use of architectural form can engender an experience with the historical knowledge embroiled within.

It is however, only through personal use over the course of the transition from new to banal that we are able to absorb the full body of architectural form.

Framed against our own preconceptions, architecture, allows constructed space to bridge personal histories through shared spatial experience. When looking for examples of this empathetic mundane I look to the many coffee shops and

cafes strew through out the world. Here, connected through a shared experience there is a connective tissue that binds a group to a specific place. Whether it is the morning coffee with the paper, or conversing about politics, these places of social interest, coupled with commodified space allow people to register their reality with those around them. Personal investment thus creates an empathetic response to a particular site as a result of those interactions.

Tangent: Iconic Architecture Iconic architecture often times is perceived as something that is not mundane, but what does it mean to see iconography a thousand times? Stop signs are iconic. A red hexagon, white edge. We don’t even have to know what it says; we know as a collective what it means. So, architecture built as an icon must have relative importance. It is in the collision between the iconic and the mundane that this collective regularity that stitches a city together when architecture becomes a thread.

One thread among many that allows for definition to arise. All g eat places include defining p tterns, and like a blanket the threads are lost to the totality of form.

Tangent: Ethical Restraint Before I can return to the above question of application I see it critical to venture into a conversation of ethical restraint. I find it a social imper tive that architects as initiators of lasting physical change take into consideration the impacts manifested in a site, but also the site material extraction. This topic is discussed in the Aesthetics of Elsewhere as an understanding and critical aesthetic response to the material extraction as impacting the aesthetic merit of the greater “site� of the world. The article concludes that through an understanding of the aesthetic destruction of elsewhere, and in turn our understanding of that destruction we could, as consumers make better decisions when we buy a product. Understanding the aesthetics of elsewhere asks us to deny the impulsive nature rooted in consumerism.

It asks the user, or the consumer to pose ethical questions. Alleviating this pressure, architecture has the opportunity to take into consideration this new aesthetic for the user. Allowing the user to have an empathetic trust that the architects have taken on more than simple construction and have embedded knowledge of the aesthetics of elsewhere into a project. Like a new t-shirt, architects and clients are drawn to fashion, trend, and the newness of technological advancement as a veil for good design. However, projects rooted in newness, often successful in their ability to generate news are unable to sustain newness as repeated image quickly becomes banal. This trend towards objects, buildings, icons, become mundane must be understood as implications of sustainability. Economics will always play a role in the creation of architecture, to deny this is to deny reality, but it does not mean we have to succumb to the rationalities of the now.

We must investigate the past, illustrates its strengths and garner strength from the truths found there. So to apply ethical restraint we must come to terms with the restrictions upon ourselves as designers and find, in the mundane a truth f historical habitation in a place to better understand what is implicitly associated to our site. This could be seen as defaulting to vernacularism, but I do not preclude form but use as the foundation for meaning. That if we approach architecture as an object that is ethically restrained from its onset, architects must realign a project with the particularities of site.

Ethical Empathy Like a scab over a wound the traces of the past are bound in the surface of the built environment. Our collective past is tied to the places we inhabit and as we expose those places to the newness of renovation their potency is weakened.

It is this reference and adherence to sympathetic memory that architecture must root itself. In this same vein I would argue that architecture does not need to be explicit in its infliction of iconography.

I do not want to reduce the importance of iconic architecture, but want to

recognize that architects, given limited design flexibility and restricted by client, budget, or desire still have societal effect.

Through shear critical mass of mundane architecture an infrastructure speaks to us. This conversation is one of silent resonance that we are not expected to respond or even acknowledge. This form of the mundane, having the potential for ethical empathy allows us to traverse the everyday. Without the mundane there could not and cannot be the extraordinary. The two are intrinsically fused in the completion of place. As long as we are able to step far enough from the epicenter of our own experience there is a moment, on the fringe of preconception, where the mundane becomes exotic. Here, on this edge, ethical empathy finds a home.

We must grapple with the impositions that the unusual plays on our preconceptions of the mundane.

Thus, ethical empathy, a condition of moral rightness, asks us to share with the specificity of context and submerge ourselves to understand there corresponding duality. Ethical empathetic design aligns us with the practicalities of living in a particular location. It allows architecture to breathe with place. When we are able to engender a project with an empathetic resonance it lives beyond walls, doors, and windows. It becomes something personified by usefulness and through its functionality is both mundane and magnificent.

END

Aesthetics of the Mundane: Proximity & Distance

Architectural Mediation

Disinterest and Distance

Architecture, as an aesthetic object, bridges a dialogue between Kantian disinterested distance and personal proximity. Buildings are an object that is often placed somewhere between art and inhabitation. Architecture should be defined by, bound by, and inclusive of both aesthetic distancing and proximity in relationship to aesthetic judgment.

This inclusion will assist in allowing architecture a means to grapple with the complications of aesthetics and pair it with the sensuality of proximity.

Aesthetics in the traditional Western formulation is bound in a visually dominant world of objective understanding that separates the sensual into distinct hierarchical parts. Aesthetics, rooted in Platonic understanding, allows us to conceptually contemplate an object of our interest by separating our lower senses (taste, touch, and smell) from our higher senses (sight and hearing). Born from this separation and distinction of sensual understanding, Kant suggests that the viewers must place themselves at both a mental and physical distance to be able to fully perceive the totality of an object. This placement of our mental and physical selves allows us to become disinterested emotionally to what we are attempting to place judgment upon.

Disinterest permits us to see the object of our judgment as not something we desire, but instead as an object with definable properties that make it beautiful or good. This state of disinterest is at the core of how we are expected to approach the judgment of beauty.

Beauty and more specifically universal beauty can only be obtainable through this act of disinterested judgment. This placement of our cognitive selves allows the object to be perceived correctly and without subjective input or input born of our lower senses. Our lower senses, according to Kant, create a distraction to truth and do not permit us to dissociate from the sensual experience. This is defined by our dual nature of mind and

Architecture as a product bound in the immediacy of our sensual body fractures the conversation when aesthetic theory is used as the single mediator of beauty.

Translating architecture through a dual dialectic allows a conversation or a narrative to arise from the philosophical encroachment that each stance places on the other due to fundamental theoretical concepts. However, when placed in parallel tension, they are able to lend to one another characteristics that assist architecture to become a mediator of personal engagement with the world. Through this mediation, architecture within the built environment is capable of bringing a user into an intimate proximity to place or locality while simultaneously transporting them conceptually beyond the bounds of the users own experiences.

26

body. This duality, one that exists here in the terrestrial and the other, which is boundless through conceptual thinking, must be separated to see universal beauty clearly.

Thus an argument for prohibiting the use of our subjective lower senses is defensible due to the burden placed upon our judgments of beauty. Distances must be engaged through conceptual separation to understand beauty so our judgment is not diluted with the subjectivity of sensual input. The mind, as a Platonic extension of the heavens, allows us to be both part of and detached from the immediacy of the object.

However, through this detachment we separate and divide the senses into a hierarchical pyramid with the visual at the pinnacle. Platonically, our higher senses, sight and hearing, allow us to transcend the concrete and elevate our minds to a state that perceives not of an object as beautiful, but to conceptualize beauty itself as an ephemeral idea in and of itself. This conceptualization then becomes the object, and can propagate in the minds of those that can perceive it. This elevated state, in the context of our contemporary lives, has become over-emphasized as the primary means of managing sensual input and subjugates our “lower senses” to mere animalistic impulse. Kant, building on the principles of Platonic beauty, furthers this argument by creating a perceptible distance that must be obtained to perceive beauty.

This distance, as suggested by Edward

Bullough in “Physical Distance as a Factor in Art and an Aesthetic Principle” asks us to divorce ourselves emotionally from the moment and by “putting the phenomena, so to speak, out of gear with our practical, actual self; by allowing it to stand outside the context of our personal needs and ends”.

Introduction of Proximity This removal of oneself from the phenomena does not take into account the multiplicity of contextual, experiential, and environmental factors that can weigh one’s judgment when attempting to define what is “universally beautiful”.

Beauty, as something to be seen at distance, dominates our contemporary understanding of space and identity.

Distancing, detaching, and quantifying the world around us is creating a dangerous aesthetic divide between what we believe is real and what is reality. Digital media only exasperates the hyper consumptive articulation of visual stimulus and further propagates this divide between our senses. This exasperated state elevates ocular sense , which becomes the primary sensual input in mitigating what we see in contrast to what is real.

However, through a physical engagement (taste, touch, and smell) we are able to form a conception of our reality that is verified from multiple personal sources.

Thus proximity, in opposition to distance, allows us to engage with the reality of the world. It allows us to experience clarity, through direct experience, of 27

what is real. This direct connection to our understanding is vital to seeing the greater context of our distanced perceptions.

Distance and Proximity To understand this relationship I reference my own experience occupying Le Corbusier’s Legislative Building in Chandigarh India. The building, separated by a twenty-minute tuk tuk ride from the heart of the sprawling city is isolated and only accessible with written permission from the tourist board. It is in this, that the first experiential presence of the building is altered. Instead of a large expansive project allowing for free movement and use, it is inversely experienced as isolating and inaccessible. The calm reflecting pool surrounding the building is in actuality on the back of the structure and is nearly impassable by foot. Only by walking along a concrete edge is one able to maneuver past the pool to the “view� often seen through documented representations.

It is this illusion that separates the reality of the building with the imagery often presented. As an object it is quite beautiful, but as something to be experienced it is domineering, heavy, and unapproachable. For its seriousness, the building is not fully understandable till you enter inside. The interior is cool, quiet, and calm. The concrete that seemed so austere on the exterior softens and stretches above your head. The low light of the interior, in contrast to the beating sun outside is enlivening and allows the interior to move and dance through the

use of shadow. It is through this direct experience that I was able to both see the fallacy and inability of the visual to appropriately demonstrate the totality of the project.

However, to judge the building solely through physical appreciation I would be unable to step back from my physical self to see it as something that transcends its immediate surroundings.

The project delicately uses concrete as a plastic building material at a time when it was inconceivable. The open plan on the exterior may come under the burdensome reality of time, but it is majestic in its occupation of space.

In a country so densely populated it demands relevance by the sheer weight of its perimeter and when you are able to divorce yourself from its cultural implications for a moment the procession of time that is eclipse on the grounds embeds itself in our common history both in India and throughout the world.

It is by this inclusion of proximity and distance the building becomes more than inhabitation while still holding onto its majestic use of space and material. The meaning is wound through the concrete like rebar and embeds a message in the occupant.

Proximity of our Senses When we interact with architecture, it is an experience of substance. Concrete, brick, steel, glass, and wood construct

the foundation of our physical reality.

Buildings, bound by the earth exist in the real, in the “here” and “now” of our lives. This is in contradiction to Platonic and Hegelian theory, which places architecture at the bottom of the hierarchy of art that we are unable to deny our physical selves. Thus proximity, the condition or position of being near or close by in space, nearness, allows us to interact with site, space, and place directly through sensorial engagement directs interaction, manifested through the immediacy of our senses, and allows us to create definable experience bound by the reality of inhabitation. These experiences are not isolated to the extraordinary, but extend themselves into our daily lives and places we inhabit.

Home, as a manifestation of an extraordinary architectural experience, holds in its perimeter a truth an experience that is articulated through the non-extraordinary. This proximity to home and our awareness of home is framed by the time that is required for a gradual definition of inhabitation through our sensual experience. Thus, our senses: sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch, allow for connections between our empirical self and our physical form that inhabits a space. Senses allow individuals to organize their personal reality and act as a mediator between the individual and the group. This mediation through the sensuous connects and grounds those involved within a culture or subculture to the locality , which is defined as home.

Home, through our physical inhabitation grows from the slow knowledge of verifiable personal information. Like Le Corbusier’s Legislative Assemble, my inability to experience the structure slowly and entirely removes it from the implications of home, but illustrates the problematic reference of our immediate senses. This problem inversely justifies proximity by its ability to transport us through time by direct sensual input.

Senses of Aesthetics The key to my front door sticks. Once inside the lock resists, contorts, and torques the key out of plane until finally, moving the pins the key spins and turns the lock. The doorknob, exposed to the winter chill is cold, crisp against my hand.

It stimulates the activity of entrance and reconnects me to the cold. I open the door; pull the metal cord hanging from the foyer ceiling, the small vestibule is illuminated. Walls, stairs, the torn wall paper all come into focus. I am home.

Beyond the traditional visually dominated aesthetic discourse, our other senses allow for experiential completion of knowledge that includes verifiable personal information (sensual input). Experiential information enacts upon us a conceptual shift that mitigates the transference of space to place. Thus, when it becomes a site (a place enacted upon), we are emotionally moved in response to the action taken upon it. Thus, humanizing

“Imagine a fog at sea; for most people it is an experience of acute unpleasantness. Apart from the physical annoyance and remoter forms of discomfort such as delays, it is apt to produce feelings of peculiar anxiety, fears of invisible dangers, strains of watching and listening for distant and unlocalised signals. The listless movements of the ship and her warning calls soon tell upon the nerves of the passengers; and that special, expectant, tacit anxiety and nervousness, always associated with this experience, make a fog the dreaded terror of the sea (all the more terrifying because of its very silence and gentleness) for the expert seafarer no less than the ignorant landsman.”

Edward Bullough, “Psychical Distance’ as a Factor in Art and as an Aesthetic Principle”

architecture is inherently emotional and is the vitality of great places. Our empathy with architectural form and the places they define for us is tethered to our consciousness by our sensual experiences. Connecting to architecture through our senses must be realized as a defining characteristic that cannot be realized without experience when approached from a purely aesthetically disinterested attitude.

Touch Touch allows for us to verify information and orient ourselves in space. The visual is but one determinant of input, and when coordinated with touch, it connects the two and allows for a complete understanding of an object. Touch allows us to sense the world around us by direct experience, and verifies the inclusion of our connected senses. Without touch, without verification of source, vision is dangerously susceptible to the intrusion of subjective understanding. Without the ability to ground us through tactile information the optic is in essence unverified truth . So much so that when we distance ourselves from an object to understand it “completely” we lose that which exists between the tension of art, object, and culture. This tension is bound in the finger tips and the realization of solidity. When we are able to sensually interact with an object, coupling it with cultural importance we construct a network stitch artistic representation to object to a specific

culture. This contact allows us to come closer to understanding these conflicts as materializations of form, structure, and beauty. Immediacy of touch forces us to place ourselves in contact with an object bound by our vision.

Hearing What do we hear? How do we hear?

Reverberations, fluctuations of voice bounce and come into contact with our physical body and are translated through our cognitive senses. This translation is susceptible to subjective understanding, and as such should be recognized like vision, as a fallible sense. Like all senses, hearing requires a second form of verification. The subordination to the other senses should not be understood as a negative implication. Hearing is an essential component to our personal ability to orient ourselves within culture.

Language, as primarily act of audio frequency, allows us to manage our actions when placed in social settings that require interpersonal communication.

Thus hearing is essential to orienting ourselves in physical space in conjunction with socio-cultural context.

Smell Smell is considered within Platonic philosophy to be one of the lowest forms of sensory input. It is considered a subjective sense due to its role within emotive memory. I would contest that this correlation to a specific smell, something that is rooted in the purity of

the natural world, is far more objective than that of visual realization. Fall leaves will always smell like leaves. A chocolate cake will always smell like a chocolate cake . These smells in their ability to engage both an emotional and physical recording are incredibly important to how we engage the physical world.

Smell allows us to transcend time with the shared connectivity of place that is experienced individually. A sensuous connectivity between people, is formed through an intimate habitation of a space.

Taste Taste as a means of orientation within our proximate world is lined with conflicting outcomes. Of the five senses taste, oral sensation is often considered the most barbaric or animalistic.

I find this animalism comforting, however. The connection of food, the connection to others through a shared experience allows taste, more than its sensual counterparts, to place us in direct connection with others without physicality. This shared empathetic experience, as a product of human repetition is essential to how we manage perception beyond the confines of our empirical selves .

Sensual Immediacy The brick underfoot can be felt. The density is unmistakable. The loose weight of clay resonates through the public square as feet traverse its wet surface.

The dull sound of falling water echoes from the fountain below a strategically placed Starbucks. The light rail line hums to a red light and the #12 bus rumbles through a green. Between sips of coffee a couple huddles under an awning, building courage to step into the rain. The cascading brick steps down to the large open plaza where the public cuts the corner between 6th and Broadway.

As we manage our personal reality we take sensuous input and place it against our empirical persona. This stimulus is immediate, instantaneous, and specific to us. We imbue that knowledge with emotional context and ground it in our personal conception of space.

The outcomes are both personal and universal. They allow us to attach to place, to a site and engage with what it means to be an inhabitant of space that is larger than ourselves both physically and conceptually. Sensuous input of information can be perceived as quantifiable data that, when becoming a participant, connects us to a larger understanding of inhabitance. This connection is a realization of time. Each experience of a locality allows us to define it sensually and incrementally.

Unlike the tourist traps throughout the world, local inhabitation is not simply defined by snap shots, or “I have been there� experiences. It is the slow growth of personal experience that connects us beyond our own physical self to the greater populous. In this, our sensuous understanding is capable of eliciting

beauty derived in itself as an act of artful humanity. As we traverse the gorge between ourselves, our community, our city, there forms a network and an extension of what it means to be home. This extension allows space, the vacuous area bounded by architecture, to be enlivened to place, to sites of exchange. This act of distance, of expansion by inhabitation is much like that of disinterested appreciation of beauty that allows for an understanding of and appreciation for the implications that determine beauty. When we detach from the physical world through learned experience we are able to manage ourselves within the context of others by differentiating the conceptual home versus our immediate home. Placed upon one another, the combination allows for us to reveal humanity as something that exists in the fringe between conflicting realities. This sensuous immediacy demands a counter agent to reconcile its haste with a slow understanding of place, space, site, and time. Thus, personal, communal, metropolitan distancing not only allows us to see the greater beauty found in the network of place, but also engenders proximity by cohabitation. Here, the problems that arise from the parallel tension between distance and proximity (loss of objectivity, detachment from place, and loss of personal responsibility) are transformed into positive positions. Thus, disinterest and distancing, as an aesthetic act, must take into account the realities that span the proximate and global. By subverting

the traditional act of distance with one entwined with our sensual being, we are able to approach problems of beauty as virtuous solutions.

Distance as a stretching of conceptual understanding has many forms, but one particular example I found nearly everyday while living in Portland, Oregon.

Every morning I walked the two blocks to Barbur Boulevard where I waited for the #12 bus to come to a stop at the bus stop at the top of the stair. I would take the two steps into the cab and be transported to work. This simple act, although so experientially contextual, leaves little to see beauty within.

However, as I continually rode the bus, felt the persistent timing, and saw familiar faces riding with me, the network of this single bus stretched beyond myself and traversed into a state of detached wonder. The complexity, the timings, and the faith in something so menial as the bus, became an organizer for my entire day. The regularity of the network and the understanding that it would be there when I needed it became beautiful. I was drawn to the intricacies of my route and its implications for the entirety of the Portland Tri Met Public Transportation network. As a piece of artful humanity it was gorgeous, but it required me to see it from a bird’s eye. I had to detach myself from the moment. Like Bullough’s fog, I too let the experience out of gear with my practical self. The efficiency of this system was so meticulously planned that it became something more than

a simple bus ride to work. It gave me a sense of connection to others, to my neighborhood, to my city. These are the moments where distance, as a means of appreciation, as a result of disinterest allows for a new revel of personal wonder. Unlike Corbusier’s legislative house, it does not have to be extraordinary; it simply must allow us to see beyond ourselves to a wider set of implications that manifest meaningful connectivity. Like our senses connect us personally to place, our collective imaginations connect us to whole countries.

Distanced Proximity Artist Rirkrit Tiravanija defines meaning to his work “Rucksack” as a creation that “through the use meaning arrives”.

Meaning, something that is derived from the author and given to the user, is traditionally inherent to architecture.

It is found in every doorknob and frame of a window. However, architecture is practically defined as a functional and useful object. This usefulness places the built environment on the fringe of traditional aesthetic theory. I would contend that the immediacy of use, one bound in the practicality of usefulness, should be seen as aesthetically beautiful.

This beauty is extracted from Architecture as an object that roots us conceptually and intimately to a particular place. Through this connective tissue it has the ability to transcend disinterested

beauty and traverse between two states of distance. This intimacy with the fringe of architectural aesthetics is where the cloud between distance and proximity comes to a confluence. Hiding in the opacity between form, function, and beauty we are able to intertwine a variety of concepts within the singularity of a building while still considering the implications of distance both proximately and globally. Architecture, if seen through singular act of disinterest, is often relegated to simply a surface, and through our slow understanding of place architecture reaches far beyond the bounds of its perimeter form .

Architecture’s proximity to our physical form articulates its capacity to isolate moments in our everyday life that give clarity to a global aesthetic confluence.

Thus, it is able to express new realities of what distance means to aesthetics and transform into a connective fiber between personal and communal space that allows us to unwind sensual immediacy into empathetic global.

Importance of Distance The plaster is cracking, shedding like dried elbow skin off the building. Inside the walls are growths. Mold rich drywall is piled in a corner and the studs are bare, the rooms divided now by only bone.

Home has eroded back to space, to mere occupancy. Inhabitation is now only a residual context of an old pot still on the stove.

Despite its elevation of visual judgment of beauty, distance is necessary to properly see architecture. Like the short narrative above, without distance, without stepping away from the conception of a project we are unable to determine critical flaws in our creations. Architecture thus has the opportunity to position itself as a material representation of ethical and conceptual growth. By locating architecture as an object that can be viewed by distancing ourselves from its physical form we are able to insert it into an ethical infrastructure. In his The Nature of Design, David Orr illustrates how through a thoughtful and critical design process architecture has the ability to create a “curriculum embedded in any building that instructs as fully and as powerfully as any course taught in it” with an analysis of the reconstruction of the Oberlin College Environmental Sciences building. This usefulness of architecture as teacher has to be pursued as both a societal good, and in the moment of pause as an object of beauty.

As illustrated in the narrative, without a distanced approach to designing and implementing architecture, we are doomed to constructing functionally ugly buildings. The apartments described above are the result of the architect not considering the rain-laden environment

of Oregon. The rain, as it seeped through the plaster siding, infiltrated the walls causing the rooms to be cold. When the temperature was increased to counter environmental infiltration mold was able to grow between the interior and exterior finishes. As an approach to distance, architecture must manage expectations that result in solutions that are born from a critical understanding of a building’s siting. Balancing a new duality of beauty, one inspecting both the proximate and the distanced, we must assume the inherent good of design and designate it beautiful as an ethical imperative.

This ethical distancing is a needed step to bridge between established concepts of beauty and move architecture into a realm between art as non-emotive mental construct and the real or physical inhabitable object. Inhabitation, however, places a heavier burden on the act of distancing oneself from the object and asks the user to decipher a building into experiential parts. These fragments of a building, when amalgamated by gradual inhabitation, allow the user to see the totality of both useful meaning and form.

This construct, when coupled with an understanding of architecture’s ability to enact moral good, can begin to alter ethical perceptions of how to interact

with both space and the larger societal context.

Aesthetics of Elsewhere Reconstructing the conceptual framework for beauty we must consider the ethical and moral considerations as fragments within the philosophical discourse of beauty.

Ethical fragmentation, like the gradual inhabitation of architecture, allows for a slow uniting of partitioned knowledge.

To this effect, in “The Aesthetics of Elsewhere: An Environmental Everyday Aesthetics� Jonathan Maskit confronts the environmental destruction associated with a high consumption lifestyle. Maskit tries to stitch together the western consumption patterns with the aesthetic considerations that frame our purchasing decisions and the modern demand for newness. The aesthetics of newness when married with aesthetic incentive manifests a culture in search of what is only temporary. This, compounded with our obsession with visual representation, constructs an ideology of the world that is outside time. The expediency of transportation goods and services only aid in this conceptual fallacy as our purchasing power allows us to obtain this fleeting moment and derive pleasure

from the aesthetic of the purchase faster at farther distances. However, we must include in our understanding of this aesthetic that our purchase, although fulfilling our immediate need, places an equal aesthetic pressure upon its point of origin. Thus, to ethically consider aesthetics, we must first be able to distance ourselves at multiple scales to fully see the implications of a singular purchase. Like experiencing space over an extended period of time, we must see aesthetics of elsewhere as external pressures on both time and site.

Stemming from an understanding of our proximate selves we are able to step back at greater intervals to see the network that moves outside the boundary of our city and connects us nationally and globally.

Applied Elsewhere It has become more common in modern buildings to source products as close to the site as possible. This locality oftentimes limits the use of certain materials. However, this challenge, when presented to architects, should not be seen as a disadvantage. Instead these limitations should be seen as a problem that calls for virtuous solutions. In Ladakh India, just outside of Leh is a small school tucked into the hills of the Himalayas

which has become an innovator in local building practices. The buildings, constructed of either compacted earth block or granite stone, use traditional building techniques and combine them with modern innovations like passive solar heated trom walls. Through this careful planning and intertwining of past and present, the campus has become a beautiful representation of how these problems of accessibility, sustainability, and program can manifest into truly virtuous solutions. Led by ARUP engineering and architecture, the campus has been able to build a facility that encourages growth of the community, a school, and its students. Through the use of local labor, materials, and building practices, the architecture has not submitted itself to the locality and instead reinvigorated it with new possibilities.

This exchange between the past and the present is essential if we are to understand the aesthetics of elsewhere in relationship to contemporary architecture.

Contemporary architecture, when discussed as beautiful, must be reconstructed conceptually to bring about by an understanding of distance and ethical discourse. Architecture, as a physical manifestation of ethical propriety, has the opportunity to build on this conversation by means of making, materials used, labor practices, and understanding that the world we build today is intertwined with an ethical code of tomorrow. Ethical architecture that is concerned with both moral placement

and aesthetic beauty will have the opportunity to implement incremental ethical change over time.

Return to Proximity Through this extension of the aesthetics to architectural experience we return back to the place of its origination.

Distance may allow us to conceive of other realities, but our physical body remains. We remain. We still touch, taste, and see the world. Architecture’s ability to house experience, to connect individuals to the physicality of the world, and design that interaction has the singular goal of manifesting beauty whenever possible. Defining beauty as a cyclic feature of proximity to distance and back to proximity allows the user and the architect to engage in a conversation.

This conversation now has the chance to span lifetimes, and like our understanding of place, is born from personal time and critical awareness. When we are able to enter into this conversation as designers, it is our job to reconcile site, space, and create places that house function. We are not imposing our meaningful will upon a site, but instead reacting to the realities placed upon us to create a beautiful object. However, by understanding the possibilities of proximate distance, architecture can expand its influence beyond functionality and accept our need for beauty as an inherent good. By ethically approaching the local and global of the forms we create, while accepting the need for beauty, architecture can

hold onto its virtuous intent while still crafting beautiful places. If we accept our functionality as constructors of fringe conditions between proximity and distanced experiences, we can mitigate a multiplicity of realities that contract and extend the surface of a building. The sensuous birth of function is at the base of allowing for an ethically constructed act of disinterested beauty. Instead of denying beauty we should redefine its parameters and how it is approached.

without care, without its consideration in our daily lives we degrade the experience of what it means to be human. Instead, care is replaced it with cliché, trendy, the modern, the contemporary, the now, the new and hope that it fulfills the care we have lost in our everyday lives. Care can only be derived from an understanding of the sensual proximity of our daily lives and a distanced realization of our actions within a greater societal context.

END

Aesthetics and Ethics of Care Careful, caress, care come to mind when we begin to build this ethical discourse into the fabric of use. To bring my thoughts to a tentative end I have found that more than anything, we must care. We must care to inhabit careful places. We must care to purchase carefully considered products that in turn care about their origins. It has taken the length of this paper to abstractly define what seems so apparent in these concluding words. That without care, without consideration, without the caress of hope, none of this is possible. The finitude “I don’t care” is so completely devastating that it manifests the worst in people and places. It allows for use to be coopted and people to be coarsened. As architects, as designers, as citizens we must care about our placement in the world, and what we place there within.

Through care, the infinitude of growth is possible. Not just within architecture, or aesthetics, or design, but in life. But

Re-Contextualize The potential for found opportunities provided me access into the everyday. Using the site of the gallery I captured the space with the insertion of a reconfigured personal collection. Blue print student work from the 1960’s were displayed in the gallery using the previous contents of the gallery as props.

This re-contextualization of the work gave me my first insight into the potentiality of illuminating the mundane through the act of particular curation and how relationships to site adjust perception.

and the room shook the ground broke blood on the concrete recon (dis) figured 38

39

We do not need to redefine, but only find what we are looking for.

The site already exists and is already real. It takes nothing for granted, for it is only the bare necessity of what should be present.

3 Weeks For 3 weeks I collected, built, and organized 15 boxes that contained the fragments of time and memory. The boxes were both architectural and representational of my own interest in the world we create for ourselves.

We do not need to redefine, but only find wh t we are looking for. The site already exists and is already real. It takes nothing for granted, for it is only the bare necessity of what should be present.

Purpose and Prose: Pulled from the tracks, the metal tie is heavy, rusted, grotesque. It flakes and chips, and cuts my hand. I keep it, tetanus or not.

When finding the work I must first find myself within it. There must be an exploration of what it means for me to design, to explore, to learn, to live, to die. The end is only the beginning and I cannot depend on what I already know, but inversely I do not need to invent. There are places that my work has already taken me and will take me if I am able to follow the trajectories of my own thinking. It has been, will be, and is present.

Time is present in all that I do. To accept this is at the heart of accepting my place and mitigation of the world. The intrusion of thoughtful design allows me to fully participate in the conclusions made by you and myself. Time is expansive and yet introspectively close. Now and then, past and present. It shifts, morphs, and alters all that we come in contact with.

world in hopes of transcending to Nirvana. I assess that like all religions, the act of elevation is at there core. Escaping the terrestrial for the celestial. Escaping the mundane for illumination.

Through the act of death escape is found. Death of the mundane. By this act I am elevated from repetition, from pain, from suffering, from sin, from worry, and my human carapace.

Through this elevation, I, the viewer, me, kills the mundane. It is struck down with perspective, through the lens, through the visage of its magnificence.

Acknowledgment is death. Death feeds on the belly of the mundane. Sinister in its plight to vanquish the trivialities of life. Yet the mundane, like guerrilla fighters that refuse to succumb and will not fail in its persistence. It is my challenge to find the seams between death and mundanity and place myself there within.

Objectific tion is inevitability.

I do not need to place meaning onto the object, it already has meaning. It has known truths to the viewer and as such, the viewer places upon myself their own visage however true or false it may be.

This application of objectification is only possible when I destroy the mundane and illuminate its edges.

END

The Buddhist lives in a state of self perseverance to alleviate themselves from the pain and suffering of the human 42

43

Jan 21st the chill rests (brushing hands off my shoulders) I pull my collar up defense in the wilds peacoat fashioned cotton stitch impregnated flesh I am dejected and the winter nibbles on my ear

Jan 22nd The brick skips, steps, and arches. Each has a burden to carry, a load to distribute. Good soldiers, they line up for the show.

Watchful walls.

Me, myself, I am a cartographer marking their destination, there accumulation. Counting, marking, counting, checking. A step, a mark, a picture taken. No mistakes, but then again cartographers never sleep.

Jan 23rd Open Close Open Close The hinges squeal like a tin man indian burn and I twist rot like witches on the ďŹ re

Jan 24th I built a box yesterday.

Today I also built a box.

They were small.

Out of Plywood.

Inside was myself Coated with hyperbole yet I loved those boxes as I watched them burn

Jan 25th the rush of silence snow falls on cigarettes and i love the smell of gas as the meter clicks trigger vibrates the lock removed years ago stolen by the attendants that lost their jobs cleaning windshields changing oil checking tire pressure now there is only silence and i rub plastic on plastic numbers move

Jan 28th breaks spikes in the morning the pale pink light shiftless on the break inland, but still tasting salt as the seagulls call like seagulls call, cries in the morning

Jan 29th strangers in the streets, new faces on the corner are illuminated by snow fall. the weight of silence of the city sits on a window sill precipice watching a purple african lily in bloom as each occasion for change precludes the death of beauty

Jan 30th lifted by the veins of the city contorted by frost The brick heaves (breathe in, breathe out) the pattern broken tripping hazards and broken codes raze the surface

Jan 31st lines become distance distance becomes time transportation of imagination and I am lingering on corbett and gaines waiting for the bus 43 in morning cold as the rain mixes with humming a slow song lingering in tone

Feb 4th Sinking into another glass of wine Her lips Caress the edge Another drink Dragging intoxication her legs crossed an hour glass at dinner with her dress comfortably short chasing my imagination from the table

Feb 5th spent casts line the oor riddled with integrity broken unhinged in their form i have poured myself over a mold of plaster START OVER let loose the page tightens its edges, and as I attempt to edit, i’m lost.

Listless in my own desire to wonder START OVER bullet shells and shell casings. leftovers, like old turkey.

Feb 6th there are ghosts that ask little of themselves they merely exist somewhere between beauty and death they exist in a space that is neither true or false, but instead are perpetuated between two counterpoints

Feb 7th ice over the river the pipes swelling. water, once contained exhumes homes and washes the oor boards like rivers undaunted by army corps and sand bag hopes

Feb 9th Everyday we consume the world around us.

We absorb the nuance of the life that we live and adjust to its meandering. It is to this eect that we must come to terms with the reality of our own context, site, or situation.

We ďŹ nd ourselves striving for the intricacies of life, striving for what is new while running from the edge of the blade, of the knife, of death. Thus, beauty and its placement, its revelation, are experienced because of an opposition. Like poles of a magnet we must live amongst the mundane to appropriately strive for beauty.

3 Weeks: Installation Fifteen boxes, fifteen shelves, thirty five feet of wall space. This wall was essential to present the collection ‘3 Weeks’. As an instillation the work was able to be both spatial and experiential. The observer was asked to become the user and be an active participant of the narrative as they investigated each box individually or as a sequence.

3 Weeks: Project Abstract It’s seven o’clock. The sound of church bells chime from my phone. I find the screen; slide my finger across the glass and its gone. I stare at the ceiling. The pale weathered brown paint weighs over my head. The winter cold seeps through the pores of the walls and the fear of the first step to the floor teeters on the edge of my mind. For now I am tethered under the covers, the weight of warmth, a captive partner against the morning.

My room, this room, dissolves from the horizon. I find my Levis, I find my vans. Blue on black.

The narrative, the places, and the sites acted within, construct my reality that I share through physicality. Conceptual, cultural, societal placement mirrors my physical placement and defines the world by the tension between the differing poles of my mental and physical states.

Bound by this opposition, mental/physical sites present opportunities for the regularity of life to be realized, defined, and illuminated.

Embedded in the truth of physicality, within the site of exchange, is the possibility of a relational exposition of new realities. By manipulating time, distance, material, composition, I am attempting to illuminate the magnificent of the mundane as an actor of tacit opposition. Through the act of finding, manipulating, and extracting oppositional tension I attempt to enliven otherwise trivial or banal objects. By enlivening the mundane I hope discover new truths within the composition of my physical manipulations.

Life doesn’t happen to you.

You happen to life.

-Jason Wood 72

73

Fuck the Critics.

-James Victore

Masks of my Past The collections we build, hoard, find, and internalize manifest into the masks we wear everyday. This created collection of masks explores the creation of our own realities.

Faces of Masks The masks we wear are but one identity that is both perceived and projected into reality. The Mundane, the everyday, the world we inhabit is a construction of these realities mixing, overlapping, melding into a single entity that we accept as truth on faith of their relational perception.

The home, the dwelling, or the house allows us to construct spaces that construct realties, that create a new mundane, and yet are entirely banal, entirely humdrum. This banality allows us to forget, to censure out many of the possible identities that lay behind the eyes of the masks we wear.

Home, as a built articulation of a reality that transforms into a magnification of the banality of our lives. We house the many identities, we store them, like a vault we are capable of existing with multiple identities simultaneously house in one body of the home. This multiplicity, as perceived from the exterior is seen as a singularity. Perception from the edge looking in only sees the “truth� of our personhood through the closeness to the center. To our humanity. This is why the

Do a Leo. -Jason Wood 80

home, the house, the dwelling, whatever you wish to call the place we inhabit is so crucial to the world we exist within. When home disappear so does our foundation.

We are left with little to stand upon.

Inside the house there is certainty.

Accessible truths are presented to us and without question we are able to relate to the existence presented to us. Eating, sleeping, bathing and the related rooms are known without question. They are understood, and yet entirely personal.

The bedroom becomes intimate, the bathroom sanitary, the kitchen aromatic.

Our senses allow us to access the room and make it particular and inversely universal to what we understand as inhabitable truth. Inhabitable truth.

Immediate truth, no longer faith. In the home an unequivocally undeniable truth is presented to us and constructed.

END

81

Projection

Fragment

Slides, screens, translucent memories are affixed to the face. We see in, they see out. An inversion as the mask is skipped over vision.

Shards laid upon one another. Each section a reflection, a broken memory. We re-stitch our history together so we can dawn it over our a perceived identity.

017: The Creation of a Room

Architecture is the constructed physicality of reality, of experience, and is occupied by individuals unaware of intention. This divide in experience, controlled and contrived, allows a gap to open upon the surface of the body and building. Our senses become the controller of experience and the experience is defined by our own personal realities. However, the control of the architect is asserted by the orientation, classification, and positions allowed or disallowed within a single space. These sets of experiences, or relationships, allow for phenomenal aesthetics. Phenomenological position is both control and freedom for the designer and the user. Like a computer, set to 1 and 0, these conditions switch between internal / external forces dependent on position and action. Thus the room, the design of our intention is the manifestation of force and position.

Through this act, 017: was created. It was my intention to build a room, to build architecture. Here within 017: the hum of the basement was matched with the reading of my Screen Play and a video of a figure reading the pages within. The lights, set above each seat allowed the user a space within the room to become a part of the reading.

Within the walls of the RISD Architecture building 017: became a re-configuration, a glimpse into the gap, and a experience defined by the act of occupation.

Project Details Site: Bayard Ewing Building 2 College Ave. Client: Advisor & Guest Critics Program: Space for performance re-configuration Budget: $200 Time: 1 week preparation 2 days installation 2 days installed 1 day removal

Sacred in the

Mundane

Sacred in the Mundane

Defining the intangibles of life takes time and effort.

Intricacies that we hold at a distance, that we, that I censure in my daily life play a vital role in defining who I am, where I am from, and where I go from here. The banality of life demands that we adjust ourselves according to the stimulus garnered through and from our senses. It is through these experiences that our senses allow us to develop textures for life itself or, a day, a month, a year, a friend, a picture, a spoon, a table, the air, or the sun.

96

absence, and in the same vein, the beauty of the everyday only available to us via personal censorship. It is this torrent of information that we grapple with as we simultaneously censure and archive the everyday. Archived information providing a curated feedback loop of experience.

Emotional/mental feedback loops give meaning to the future by the fragments compressed into our unconscious.

We refine and define the persistently changing stasis of our lives. Volumes and volumes are written and accumulate strength with each proceeding chapter. Life, like all great narratives proceeds unabashed. Experiences are compiled and stored in the archives of our memory until experience or chance brings them to the surface. It is this need of the archive, of process that allows us to create leaps in understanding beyond the paradigms of our own currency.

In short, the reality that we claim to understand is but one of many that can exist at anyone given time. The universalities of the everyday, of the persistence of life itself, of the intangibilities that are so elusive, yet so happenstance, are what make life itself worth living. The nuance of our lives, the information we censure, the input we envelope, the realities we construct are in both regards detrimental and constructive.

Constructively, the ability to manage and censure input allows us to have new experiences that are poignant and exclusive. The consistency of everyday intangibilities washes over our consciousness and through our person endlessly. Through the sequential rush of information we are able to bring moments, exclusive experiences, to the surface. The first flowers of spring are only poignant due to their

Inversely, our need to censure our lives allows us to evade the demands that place burden upon our consciousness. War, famine, rape, and the atrocities that are layered in the news like stickers on binders are forgotten as a problem of distance. Of the other. Unacknowledged as needful recognition, our life now can be unburden by the pain of elsewhere, and in this loss of remembrance allows our joyful ignorance. We dwell within lives that are but mirrors of an image constructed through artificiality. Memories of experience, both local and external, stored in the hills of the mind stay hidden, listless, useless, unless we are courageous enough to demand their existence.

Finding stability through instability is difficult to confront. It demands courage to acknowledge the artifice of our lives and find ourselves within it. I find it no small wonder that we are able to survive the human imagination for ignorance.

Censorship, as I am allowing it to gestate within this text, is vital to architectures ability to allow people to incite events. The enactment of event, of action, is essential in the built environment, and should be expected by both society and architecture. When society ignores or more likely forgets this demand upon the built environment we find new means of restless degeneration.

In the gap between censorship and approval there exists thinly defined externalities that currently generates our built world. As a populous, I see that we have allowed this space to be manipulated, augmented, and perverted by sources that maneuver between approval and censorship. It is my interest that the built world we occupy and inhabit, reflect a world that should exist instead of the one that does.

Architecture, and the built environment, may not actively act as a participant of sociopolitical struggles, but it constructs the reality that we must live within. Parks and parking lots are not

97

98

99

the same. Just as a place to live and a place to call home are not. One is an allowance and the other an adherence. The foundations of our lives, the place we exist is located in the mundane, everyday, or unexceptionably. These sited gaps more readily define the world around us. If contingency allows perversion of society into the infrastructure of its creation, then it is grounded, enacted upon, and lived within. This is an unacceptable ends.

We see the Column as the Column We accept the column is real, we accept that it is what it is, that it will hold us up and the ceiling above. That it will not break. We ignored the tangential network that supports that column.

The innumerable hours that created it and the sweat spent on its construction. The lives it has saved.

It is to this effect that the destruction of that column is the destruction of perception, of perspective. The foundation of a building is in essence the foundation of our minds. We have faith in the everyday that it will persist; it is this act of self-censorship that when shifts in the everyday occur we are astounded. Coincidence and magnificence are both extreme and banal moments where we are altered, changed by our surroundings. Thus when a building is destroyed we are fundamentally altered. If we can’t protect the foundation of concrete and steel how can we possible protect ourselves?

It is this fear that we strive to alleviate through the acceptance and articulation of the mundane.

We need it. We thrive on it. It feeds our lives the needed stability that allows us to exist. It is such, when we alter that reality our minds search for a new perch, a new place to sit and reasons why we are so fundamentally altered by those we inhabit our lives with. We use their input and must shift our foundation accordingly. Buildings are the foundation of those ideas. Our home, the soil we dig our hands into, where we set ourselves in the world is both physically and mentally a construction of our identity.

Vision, as a means of perspective allows us to grapple with two points of information.

Each eye allows us to triangulate information.

However, vision in its placement in our physical

being inherently has a gap: a place where our mind is forced to interpolate. It is this moment of interpolation that I see the need for our haptic senses and why they are so vital to our existence. Visualization is an interpolation of content. We see a column, but a column can be faked, surfaced, or an illusion.

It is this physicality, where the foundation of our feet becomes so vital to our existence. If the floor is slanted, what does that do to our psyche? Walls that deteriorate are perceived interesting, but ultimately detrimental to our perception of place, which is then transformed to economy through property cost, rental pricing, taxes, and law. When you extend this trajectory it boils down to the property of our foundation and the need for power over our own lives. When the foundations of the built world are destroyed, life itself, existence, and most horrifically, home is destroyed. The soil of our mothers, our fathers, our home, our lives, is lost.

END

Sacred in the

Mundane Narrative of the Mask The house wakes early in the morning, the earth shifts, and stretches. The wood beams shake off the night and in the cold of the understory light slips through the windows.

Penetrates deep into space, tastes the edge of concrete, and finds the blankets lifting and falling. Two bodies still encumbered by the solace of vigilant sleep.

Breath under fabric. Benevolent warmth.

The bed, isolated by morning light, encompassed by a natural luminescence causes shadows to sway on the surface of the blue grey covers. Pulling him from the serenity of slumber the large room, the rug on the floor meets his foot. Propped along the edge of the bed he waits. His eyes blink and trace outlines of scattered clothes, lost socks, and the archive of life. Through a transverse window a familiar image focuses and opens into the room. Age, bone, and muscle test weight. The floor still holds firm. The first steps vanquish the warmth leaving only the stillness of the morning. Partial darkness, first impressions of the day, light awakens and darkness soothes the transition between nocturnal and diurnal creatures.

Instantly he is awake, conscious, cognizant of his surroundings.

Antelope in the field, the day rushes in.

The bed is a wash of light. The future, the hall, the room languishing in darkness has not yet married with the day. It will not be for several hours till the end of the corridor is fully absorbed by the sun and light is able to penetrate past the limbs of the trees outside. A towel, hung on a hanger is pulled from its perch and wrapped around his body. Inside the chamber, an atrium of the home, steel is twisted, surrendering a torrent, and the stone under foot deflects the assault of water. The room begins to soften, smooth, and encapsulate the body with building humidity. A womb of wood and block, of rough and porous highlighted by darkness alleviates the pressure of the coming day. The building is a threshold. It is the place of our solace, it captures our soul, and as he washes his body he waits for the day and the sun to illuminate the bedroom.

Descent masks two floors, two fa es, three sided knowledge.

Between two poles the stairs wait patiently with structural tenacity. Traversing the first step footing and foundation are broken. The user, the building are able to feel each other, are able to join in the declivitous sensation of revelation and exclusion. Light, punctuated by darkness floats the stairs over one another. The decent seems to beckon the user into the belly of the house. The room bellows in silence and is punctuated by an

102

expanse of glass that breaks his visual continuity with interiority. It pulls his vision into the courtyard and there, preservations of time, a tree, lumbers like a great watchtower and the morning becomes a statue melting through a narthex.

The naïve, structural credulity.

His back to the watchful exterior he runs his hand along the polished walls finding the familiar place where a knot protrudes just slightly from the wall, a dent, left from an errant dish has left a definable scar, and its in those particularities the world is grounded. It is those details that the existence of time, in his existence of history, of personal foundations is constructed. Stepping out from the ambulatory the details bore into the wooden table are marks, definitions defining convergence. On the stove, over an open flame the kettle sings and the room’s walls are adorned with vibrancy. Hot water held in both hands is steadily mixing to the oscillations the mug, slowly warming, defending him from the cold. Hewn wood, planed, the live edge still exposed holds valiantly from the wall and accepts the weight of an empty cup. Dishes from the night before are still resting on its surface.

They capture a strange cacophony of disorder and nihilistic elegance.

“And the dish ran away with the spoon”

The stairs, their final descents are unmistakable.

Each step a reminder, an unmistakable traversing farther from his bed and at their terminus awaits his exit. A door locked and bolted. Externality held at bay by the density Beyond that wooden door, beyond this final convergence lays a city still waking from a busy night, still recuperating from its own anxiety. Pulling the strapping tight he pulls his mask over his face. The heavy wooden mask is pulled close, the bridge of his nose holding the brunt of the weight as he prepares his final descent and as the front door gives, the street rushes through the opening. The latch closes behind him and the house is left, END

103

The fragmented door. An entrance into the user.

104

105

106

Phenomenal Aesthetics Our daily lives in large are mundane. They consist of routine, habituation, and menial repetitive acts.

Repeat, repeat, repeat, each word typed to distinctly decode our own repetition, our own repetitions.

We have anniversaries, birthdays, holidays set on a calendar, set in time. We go to work, come home, eat dinner, sleep and repeat. Each day lapses into the next, but at times we are able to glimpse into other realities and trace the magnificence of otherwise mundane events.

It may be a puddle reflecting the sky above, a slow breeze dancing with the summer foliage, or a casual encounter with an old friend. Some call it chance, some divinity, some god, but despite the name it is in these collisions that we are able to see through the gaps of our own reality. We are looking into an inversion where beauty can be found and truth unveiled.

Within the gap greatness waits. It is what we strive for when we create, when we love, when we explore. Beauty, the aesthetic of greatness, is derived from the gap of two intersecting phenomena passing through the fragments of our combined experiences.

physically and mentally to obtain inclusion into these parallel worlds. Drugs, sex, music, and art all attempt to alleviate the habituation of life and illuminate the gap of reverence. It is this insatiable need and search of this gap that humanity becomes intoxicated with the need for the presence of definable divinity.

However, it is only temporarily obtainable.

The gap, this space, this moment, this experience is like a sheet of dimensionless paper and the plane it comprises takes the form of a dimensionless mask. It becomes a surface that hides and illuminates the internalization of form. To distinguish one side from the other only inverts the relationship and like a mirror we are looking out in on our own actions. Within the gap we are consumed by the expanse of minutia, but the plane is fractal, temporary, and elusive. Once it has been found it disappears from the surface and reseeds.

It is in the hunt we hunger for the kill.

Thus the mask, as a surface, has neither origin nor trajectory. It simple persists between realities like mortar between bricks and when it fails, the mask is lifted.

Given time, I took the time, and it was just.

It is in this gap, this divergence of two trajectories where we find truth, or inversely the root of a lie. It is the removal of a veil to find a new one, and in that illumination we reconfigure our own image and must adjust ourselves to better suit a new reality.

However, in this search of these phenomena we, as humans, will go to great extents both

Phenomenal aesthetics, as an inclusion to the discovery of magnificence must be perceived as a mask in of itself. It is not present in a single form or proportion, but in the search, and in the entirety of the work. Through it the viewer can see into a parallel reality that is both theirs and mine. My work is a curated

107

The cell, the shelf is where the home becomes a vessel for our lives.

108

The door is a barrier between interiorities, between identities, and it is at this threshold we find our own realities.

109

110

111

representation of this phenomenal aesthetics and as such is curated in an attempt to discover and present the mask itself. It is of course my creation, but I have created it for the appetite of the viewer and it is in this creative act that the viewer must don the mask and enter the void to properly “see.� By allowing ourselves to see and step into the void it is my assertion that the dimensionless plane be approached as both experientially distinct from person to person and simultaneously allowing for the discovery of universal truths we all share. Curating the relationships between the fragments is essential to the entirety of the experience. No one piece is non consequential to the finality of the whole. Each section is a glimpse into the purity of process that strives for finality and brings a personal clarity to the internal

structure. Through a personal construction of the whole we can find a universal footing that is bound within a mask, within the mundane, the habitual.

Between realities I found an inconsequence. I was burdened by the inconclusiveness of my own gestation and yet satisfied to sit among the divinity it allowed me. So I persist. Body and mind mixed, like cocktails, between the lie and a truth. Singular and Plural. Actresses inversions.

Behind and within the mask the user, myself, is able to see new realities that were veiled till presented through the lens of inclusion. This inclusion is a demand of all work. For work generates product, and product is consumable, and consumption feeds the work. So to deny the inclusion of our appetites is to deny the

112

The image is generated between the gap of drawing and model. These images were created through and from the model.

113

114

process and dissolve finality. Despite my aversion to finality, it is an extent of human nature to finalize the product regardless of the work itself and as such my work reconciles this contradiction through the curation.

Two sound-tracked overlap. One left one right, the cacophony is indecipherable, yet clarifies the silen e.

This dissolution of the process, of time, engenders a need for immediacy and the search that separates products. This act of separation allows for the organization of ideas and the exclusion of others while still allowing our thoughts to manifest new masks and build new planes to stand upon. Regardless of their temporality.

The house. Doors, windows, bedrooms, a kitchen, feet, traffic, a city cloisters in a s tion of the person. What freedom we have to exist in our homes.

It is in the house however, that I believe that the temporality of our lives is of our own control. This direct and untenable control of our surroundings forces architecture to carry the heavy burden of maintaining its integrity and yet remain in a state of active stasis. These contradictory forces manipulate the building to amalgamate, grow, expand, change, at an unpredictable pace or better yet, changes set to the cycles of lives. Thus the phenomenal experience of the space must bend to the will of the occupant, and yet is unmoved. In this mental space we are obliged to live with the tangled experiences of our everyday. These realities create a dynamic of experiential efficiency that is derived from the temporality

of phenomenal aesthetics. Theses aesthetics are defined by our everyday lives and allow a broadening context of experiences.

Returning to the house, the home, architecture creates the bounds for human occupation. It is the act of occupation that allows for the construction of economic, cultural, legal principles that seem beyond our control. However inside the home, free from the trivialities of the everyday the relative static appropriation of space allows us to resituate our own personhood against the realities we have created. Within the home phenomenal aesthetics finds footing. It becomes the spaces where humanity exercises its will and hope is palpable. It is the access to hope that demands the home is a place of refuge, of escape, of safety. Of course architecture cannot demand this upon its residence, but it must allow for and build the space where it can occur.

END

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

Window to floor detail.

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145