GSAPP Portfolio

MARK POT H IER

M. ARCH CANDIDATE, 2014 GSAPP COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DESIGN STUDIOS

60 BROAD RETROFIT: C-BIP EAST HARLEM HOUSING TOWER INTERFERENCE BANK FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

SPRING 2013 ADVANCED STUDIO IV SCOTT MARBLE, JANETTE KIM, LAURA KURGAN

8

FALL 2012 CORE STUDIO III JEFFREY JOHNSON

24

SPRING 2012 CORE STUDIO II KAREL KLEIN

40

FALL 2011 CORE STUDIO I LYDIA KALLIPOLITI

50

BUILDING TECHNOLOGY COURSES

SUSPENSION INDUSTRIAL LOFT

SPRING 2013 ARCHITECTURAL TECH. 5 JAY HIBBS

60

CASE STUDY: NCMA

FALL 2012 ARCHITECTURAL TECH. 4 DAVID WALLANCE

70 5

VISUAL STUDIES [FABRICATION]

WOOD SEATING UNITS FY-LANGES

BY FY! AQAUATIC RESEARCH PLATFORM

MY [METABALL]

SPRING 2013 CRAFT IN A DIGITAL AGE NATHAN CARTER

82

SPRING 2012 FAST PACE \\ SLOW SPACE M. BEARAK + B. BORDERS

94

SPRING 2012 BEYOND PROTOTYPE JASON IVALIOTIS

102

FALL 2011 PARAMETRIC REALIZATIONS M. BEARAK + B. BORDERS

108

VISUAL STUDIES

DRAWING AND REPRESENTATION II ENCODED MATTER: ENTROPY[BODYN]

ANIMATED ORIGAMI 6

SPRING 2012 ARCH. DRAWING AND REP. II B. BRYAN + M. YOUNG

112

FALL 2011 ENCODED MATTER EZIO BLASETTI

120

SPRING 2012 ANIMATED COMPUTATION 02 CHRISTOPHER WHITELAW

128

COMPETITIONS

MILLS DISTRICT SOUTH

2013 ULI-HINES COMPETITION

132

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

STUDIOS ARCHITECTURE

SUMMER 2012 ARCH. INTERNSHIP

140

EISENMAN ARCHITECTS

WINTER 2011 ARCH. INTERNSHIP

146

7

60 BROAD RETROFIT: C-BIP

SPRING 2013 ADVANCED STUDIO IV KIM, KURGAN + MARBLE

PARTNERS: Dan Luo, Andrew Maier, Vahe Markosian

New York, New York

The Columbia Building Intelligence Project (C-BIP) leverage dataenabled geometry to drive the iteration of design strategies. The specific use of CATIA allows this exploration to occur and provides a design space that allows feedback of metrics to the designer. In this project for the 60 Broad Street tower, our building strategy focused on the ability to quickly iterate at a coarse-grained level while deriving more detailed metric outputs through the programmed intelligence.

The ultimate goal of our strategy is to enable a redefinition of value within this specific office tower typology. Existing conditions require that value is rent-driven and therefore governed by the interests of the owner.

However, both a changing culture and a changing market in downtown Manhattan suggests rethinking this value system. Our proposal is to create hybridized value between finances and employee experience and productivity. Given that each business has diverse needs, we are providing heterogeneity through spatial typology and microclimate— negotiated through the tradeoff of dead load in the slabs and facade—in order to affect employees via their daily routines and physiological working conditions.

8

9

ARCHITECT: OWNER: YEAR BUILT: # FLOORS: USE: BLDG. AREA: OCCUPANCY:

Emery Roth & Sons Wells Real Estate Funds 1961 38 Commercial OFfice Building 975,000 sq. ft.

50-60% per tenant

60 BROAD STREET exhibits the Typical Plan of the office tower typology. Flexibility of office layout is conflated with undesigned, naturally-occurring microclimates, creating discomfort and undesirable space within the buidling.

10

Z

O

N

E

1

ZONE 2 ZONE 3

MICROCLIMATE ZONES present an opportunity to rethink the office tower typology. Introduction of micro-climates within the process of homeostasis reduces prolonged physiological stressors on the body, while also providing the opportunity to restructure inter- and intra-tenant organization.

11

INPUT:

FLOOR TO FLOOR HEIGHT

INPUT:

WINDOW SPACING

INPUT:

# FLOORS

ARCHITECT INPUT:

# WINDOW BAYS

ARCHITECT ARCHITECT

VIEW DATA CONTEXT SCANNING

INPUT:

SCAN RESOLUTION

INPUT:

SCAN ANGLE

VIEW DATA

ARCHITECT INPUT:

VIEW DATA

SOLAR DATA

SCAN RADIUS

OUTPUT % UNOBSTRUCTED VIEWS

SMART BLOCK x OUTPUT

SOLAR DATA

VIEW DATA

FACADE WRAPPER AVG. DISTANCE TO OBSTRUCTION

SOLAR DATA

ILLUMINANCE DATA

FACADE WRAPPER

SOLAR

HIGH

low middle SMART BLOCK Input Value

VIEW SMART BLOCK SOLAR LOW MIDDLE low middle

HIGH HIGH

Input Value

THRESHOLD - user input

VIEW

THRESHOLD - user input

SOLAR DATA LOW MIDDLE

ILLUMINANCE DATA ILLUMINANCE DATA

THRESHOLD - user input

Output Type

Double YES Glazed Facade Double Type: Glazed: Output Type Occupiable: NO Function:Mediate Offset/Inset: OffsetExtreme Heat

HIGH

SLAB MODIFIER

Double Glazed Facade Type: Function:Mediate Extreme Heat

Double Glazed: YES Occupiable: NO Offset/Inset: Offset

THRESHOLD - user input

SMART BLOCK SOLAR Input Value

SLAB MODIFIER SLAB MODIFIER

Input Value

LOW MIDDLE

HIGH

VIEW SOLAR SOLAR DATA low middle ILLUMINANCE HIGH

LOW MIDDLE Input Value

VIEW

THRESHOLD - user input

low

Solar Value View Value

middle

middleHIGH

low

THRESHOLD - user input

VIEW

SOLAR Input Value

low

VIEW SOLAR low Input Value

low

VIEW

SOLAR

MIDDLE

low

high

high MIDDLE high LOW MIDDLE MIDDLE Input Value

THRESHOLD - user input

Double Glazed: NO HIGH Occupiable: YES THRESHOLD Offset/Inset: Inset - user input

THRESHOLD THRESHOLD - user input- user input

SLAB MODIFIER MIDDLE

THRESHOLD - user input

VIEW low

Output Type

Double Glazed: YES Occupiable: NO Offset/Inset: Offset

Type: Multiple Floor Atrium Function:Gathering and Connection

Double Glazed: YES Floor Atrium Type: External HIGH Type: Multiple Output Type Occupiable: Output YES Type Function:Balcony Function: Gathering Offset/Inset: Inset and Connection

HIGH Double Glazed: YES Occupiable: YES THRESHOLD Offset/Inset: Inset - user input

middlehigh THRESHOLD THRESHOLD - user input - user input

THRESHOLD - user input

Type: External Balcony Function:Balcony to attractive View

Double Glazed: NO Balcony Double Glazed Fac Type: Type: External HIGH Output Output Type Occupiable: YES Type Function:Mediate Extreme H Function:Balcony Offset/Inset: Inset to attractive View

HIGH LOW MIDDLE

THRESHOLD - user input

Solar Value View Value

Output Type

Balcony to attractiv

Double Glazed: NO Occupiable: YES Offset/Inset: Inset

Solar Value FACADE WRAPPER View Value

SOLAR Input Value

Input Value

LOW

middle Input Value

VIEW SOLAR middle LOW middle

LOW

VIEW

LOW

Input Value

THRESHOLD - user input

middle

SOLAR low

VIEW SOLAR

LOW low

middlehigh high MIDDLE high MIDDLE

THRESHOLD THRESHOLD - user input- user input

VIEW

Output Type

Double Glazed: YES HIGH Double Glazed: NO high Type: Louvered Curtain Wall Multiple Type: NO Floor Atriu Output Type Occupiable: Output NO Type Occupiable: Function: Louver Gathering Function: THRESHOLD Original Wall +Offset/Inset: Offset and Con Offset/Inset: NULL - user input

high MIDDLE

low

THRESHOLD THRESHOLD - user input - user input

THRESHOLD - user input

SOLAR

LOW MIDDLE ELEMENT TOOLKIT: the building strategy was carried forward via a series of analysis tools and geometric operators VIEW Input Value

12

SOLAR low middle

Input Value

LOW

VIEW

LOW

middle

THRESHOLD - user input

middle

Type: Type: Curtain Wall Double Glazed Fac HIGHLouvered Output Type Function:Original Wall +Function: Louver Mediate Extreme H

highGlazed: NO Double Occupiable: NO THRESHOLD Offset/Inset: NULL - user input

HIGH HIGH high THRESHOLD - user input

high

Output Type

Double Glazed: YES Occupiable: YES Offset/Inset: Inset

Type: External Balcony Function:Balcony to attractiv

Double Glazed: NO Type: Louvered Curtain W YES Output Type Occupiable: Function:Original Offset/Inset: Inset Wall + Lo Double Glazed: NO

USER INPUT

ARCHITECT

VIEW DATA

DATA COLLECTION

DATA INTERPRETATION CLIMATIC ENVELOPE RETROFIT FACADE WRAPPER

SOLAR DATA

SMART BLOCK

ILLUMINANCE DATA

LOCAL OPERATION

SLAB MODIFIER

ELEMENT WORKFLOW: data from analytical elements become embedded in geometrical operators to help govern the interventions that occur 13

MICRO-CLIMATE ZONE SEQUENCE: floor removal, floor shifting and facade re-cladding occurs in three passes, each informed by the previous one 14

ZONE 1

ZONE 2

ZONE 3

15

EXISTING TENANTS S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 2 S.F. ZONE 3

S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 2 S.F. ZONE 3

S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 2 S.F. ZONE 3

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS

RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA

FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA

FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA

DESIGNED INTERVENTION MASSING gives the first move to the architect and feeds back basic initial metrics to help guide this low-resolution massing 16

S $$$

D

NEW TENANTS S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 2 S.F. ZONE 3

S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 2 S.F. ZONE 3

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$

RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA

FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA

17

N W

E

S

ITERATIONS: each scale and typology of iteration yields variation in spatial character, social interaction, financial metrics, and lighting distributions 18

19

CARBON FOOTPRINT

S.F. ZONE 1 S.F. ZONE 3

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$ RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

DEVELOPER METRICS # WORKERS PER FLOOR S.F. PER WORKER USEFUL DAYLIGHT SWEATY SF*h SWEATER SF*h

OCCUPANT SPACE AND COMFORT FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA # FACADE TYPE 1 PANELS # FACADE TYPE 2 PANELS # FACADE TYPE 3 PANELS BALCONY S.F. ATRIUM S.F. VOLUME TRAPPED HEAT

BUILDING GEOMETRY

EXISTING TENANT STRATEGY utilizes smaller scale interventions of unconditioned space to introduce concentrated micro-climate variation within existing tenant and office structures and providing several isolated vertical circulation connections 20

CARBON FOOTPRINT

S.F. ZONE 3

F.A.R. DIFFERENTIAL POTENTIAL AIR RIGHTS $$$ RENTABLE S.F. S.F. PER WORKER

DEVELOPER METRICS # WORKERS PER FLOOR S.F. PER WORKER USEFUL DAYLIGHT SWEATY SF*h SWEATER SF*h

OCCUPANT SPACE AND COMFORT FLOOR AREA REMOVED DEAD LOAD REMOVED FACADE AREA # FACADE TYPE 1 PANELS # FACADE TYPE 2 PANELS # FACADE TYPE 3 PANELS BALCONY S.F. ATRIUM S.F. VOLUME TRAPPED HEAT

BUILDING GEOMETRY

NEW TENANT STRATEGY presupposes an entirely new set of tenants, each with particular needs of spatial and climatic metrics. Larger and smaller scale interventions of unconditioned zones creates a broad heterogeneity across the height of the tower 21

EXISTING CONDITION given from the typical plan typology 22

PROPOSED STRATEGY redistributing office space and tenant massing, utilizing consolidated micro-climate zones 23

EAST HARLEM HOUSING TOWER

FALL 2012 CORE STUDIO III JEFFREY JOHNSON

PARTNER: Sean Franklin

East Harlem, NYC

Housing and health played a large role in the development of this project. Central Park’s provision of a fresh air green oasis in Manhattan provided insight into how health relates to housing in an urban scale. The project aimed to provide the residents of the project a naturally lit and ventilated interior public space as well as provide a public access point to the riverfront park system, the former being accomplished through a system of interrelated bands that allow daylight deep into the interior, and the latter being accomplished by the lowest of those bands spurring off and linking to a pedestrian overpass across the highway.

The building is a set of five of these interrelated rings, surrounding a light court. Each ring holds approximately 60 housing units. The rings have a relationship that creates a changing thickness in each band based on views, daylighting and circulation. In the center of each ring is one larger public space that serves as the circulation and access to each of the three levels of a ring. On the roof of the rings there are programmed public spaces that vary based on the marketing strategy of each given housing ring.

24

25

Expanding upon Central Park’s role as a fresh air and green oasis in Manhattan, the city has begun a plan to redevelop its coasts into a continuous greenway for pedestrian and bicycle recreation and access to the riverfronts. In its current state, the East River is largely inaccessible for pedestrians, with only sporadic overpasses allowing access. In the stretch of river adjacent to the project site—131 St. and Park Ave.—there is no riverfront access, and the city’s plans for coaster redevelopment exclude this region in its continuous greenway plan.

The tower proposed on the site acts as an access hub for East Harlem, providing a much needed pedestrian and bicycle access point to a proposed extension of the greenway. Additionally, the public podium at the base of the tower is programmed with recreational aid and infrastructure, including amentities for greenway users such as bicycle rentals and repair, shops, and general information.

bicycle access

FITNESS BASED RETAIL

STANDARD WALK-UP RETAIL

26

pedestrian access

RETAIL @ GROUND

RESIDENTIAL + OFFICE @ PODIUM

BIKE RETAIL @ PODIUM + RAMP

BIKE SWAP + RENTAL @ PODIUM

BICYCLE RETAIL is separated from conventional retail by raising it onto a public podium at the base of the tower, allowing the recreational support activities to occur along the very path that is the access to the East River greenway extension.

27

P

U

UP

DN

DN

DN

DN

N

D P

U

N

D N D DN DN

DN

UP

DN

DN

UP

UP

PUBLIC STREETS: The notion of a public street, as a place of both community interaction and recreation, is repeated vertically across the tower as a means to engage all residents with a shared space and a sense of a more localized neighborhood within the tower.

28

LIGHT, AIR AND VIEWS are accommodated by separating each ring “street� loop and introducing an open level for community activities and recreation; operable full-height glazing allows the interior public corridor to breathe with the seasons, addressing issues of temperature and ventilation.

29

RING CORRIDOR, a single path splis and ramps to create access to three levels of residential units.

30

31

A

D

UPPER LEVEL

B

C

TYPICAL RING consisting of an inner band of three-story micro-units, ramping circulation path, and outer ring of mixed single-story units; both the inner and outer ring are punctured by a large public window to allow light and view porosity in and out, and are capped with shared rooftop recreational spaces.

32

(A) MICRO-UNIT hosting four beds on two levels plus a shared level for entry and living space, geared toward students and young groups

ROOFTOP LEVEL

(B) STUDIO hosting compact living and sleeping quarters for one, geared toward young professionals

MIDDLE LEVEL

(C) ONE-BEDROOM intended for young couples

LOWER LEVEL (D) TWO-BEDROOM intended for small families with children

33

MICRO-UNIT DISTRIBUTION around inner-band courtyard

STUDIO DISTRIBUTION around outer-band

ONE-BEDROOM DISTRIBUTION around outer-band

TWO-BEDROOM DISTRIBUTION around outer-band

34

+ 35'-0" E-ROOF

+ 23'-4" E3

+ 11'-8" E2

244'-6" E1

+ 35'-0" D-ROOF

+ 23'-4" D3

+ 11'-8" D2

193'-6" D1

+ 35'-0" C-ROOF

+ 23'-4" C3

+ 11'-8" C2

142'-6" C1

+ 35'-0" B-ROOF

+ 23'-4" B3

+ 11'-8" B2

91'-6" B1

+ 35'-0" A-ROOF

+ 23'-4" A3

+ 11'-8" A2

40'-6" A1

14’-0” BICYCLE RETAIL 6’-0” PODIUM

0’-0” PEDESTRIAN RETAIL

TOWER SECTION illustrating the array of five (5) three-level rings of housing units, sitting upon a public podium; W 35

1. OUTER RING AND RAMP existing on vertically adjacent floors

2. VIEW CORRIDORS govern the location for the public square, shown as a window through the massing, a function of both heigh and context

3. PEELING occurs on the outer-band massing, yielding exterior views for

4. CORRIDOR RAMPS on the ring below in reaction the the peeling on

the inner-band units in addition to allowing more daylight for the courtyard

the housing ring above, reflecting the increased ability for daylight into the corridor spaces

36

TOWER MASSING, resulting from light and view operations, introduces daylight deeper into the tower’s public space while concurrently calibrating exterior views for the inner courtyard units.

37

SITE MASSING MODEL emphasizing the reading of the tower as five distinct, separate rings of units.

38

SECTIONAL MODEL depicting vertical unit organization within a single ring.

39

INTERFERENCE BANK

SPRING 2012 CORE STUDIO II KAREL KLEIN

SOHO, NYC

The Interference Bank challenges conventions of public / private, transparency / opacity, and circulation through its juxtapositions of commercial retail showrooms and public gallery and meeting spaces. The notion of interference draws from studies into the graphic design and anti-counterfeiting measures embodied in modern currency, in which pattern modulation, color gradation, and moire effects create the unique appearance and effects that carry lessons in design beyond flat graphics and into experiential space.

The Bank tests the ability of wires, as transformable building elements, to interact and coagulate with one another to create an array of conditions that address issues of structure, platform, porosity, and shelter. It is in the weaving and crossing of multiple screens of these elements that the desired juxtapositions of program are eplored. A secondary system of full enclosure attaches itself within the structures of wires, as tissue to a skeleton, grafting between areas of partial enclosure and shelter created by the wires. These more opaque, solid volumes contain the series of retail showroom spaces, while the spaces between and through are reserved for circulation and public gallery / exhibition spaces.

40

41

SCREEN AND STRUCTURE: wires are identified in systems of screening elements and strutural bundles 42

SCREENING FILTERS: interweaving wire surfaces establish layers of filter that permit circulation, define boundaries and become both floor and wall 43

MULTI-PURPOSE WIRES: wires are interwoven and vary in profile in order to create inhabitable surface, interference screen, and structural bundles

44

45

SECONDARY ENCLOSURE: spaces of solidity nest themselves within pockets formed from the overlay of multiple wire systems

46

PROGRAM: clockwise from upper-right: banking, general office, retail, and public/community

47

48

49

FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

FALL 2011 CORE STUDIO I LYDIA KALLIPOLITI

West Harlem, NYC

As an extension of the aquatic research cell into the urban scale, the Food Research Institute continues the dynamic cycle of human-bio input and output, centered upon hydroponic food production. The process begins with the collection of food waste from local participating entities.

The waste is converted into compost tea, from which compost laboratories extract organic compounds. These compounds are recombined and calibrated to act as the fertilizing agent for the hydroponic wall modules (indoor and outdoor) across the facility.

The extracted organic compounds are also engineered for use as experimental ingredients in a kitchen studio which serves as a place for community collaboration and as an opportunity to learn healthy means of cooking and preparing meals. Urbanistically, the structural ribs of the Institute turn down upon the adjacent plaza, serving as an urban market for distribution of the Institute’s hydroponically grown produce.

50

SECTIONAL MODEL highlighting the encasement of the compost laboratories within the ribbed structure 51

SITE STRATEGY: The building’s structural skin peels back toward the site edges, facilitating east-west pedestrian movement by and through the built structure; the food waste collection route is terminated in the docking spaces that nest into the structural skin on the northwest corner

PLAN SEQUENCE progressing vertically upward from left to right 52

CONCEPT SKETCHES: highlighting stages of the Institute’s cycle of recycling, including organic waste collection, processing, extraction, and fertilization

53

URBAN MARKET: Grown produce is hosted within the structural ribs, which help organize the market into various food typologies

MODULAR PLANTERS allow hydroponically-grown produce, once ready, to be re-hosted for sale into the urban market structural ribs 54

PEDESTRIAN ENTRY to the urban market is enabled through stairs that penetrate the building, bringing pedestrians first through the experience of composting, then into hydroponic growing

55

SECTIONS: (Top) Pedestrians enter the kitchen studios and interior growing spaces by traversing the topography of the urban market; (Bottom) A collection truck docks into the receiving bay, and food waste is conveyed into the composting chamber (shown in pink), monitored by the laboratory above (orange) 56

COMPOSTING INFRASTRUCTURE

HYDROPONICS INFRASTRUCTURE

FACADE INFRASTRUCTURE 57

URBAN MARKET: The Institute’s hydroponically grown produce is featured for sale in an urban market extending off of the topography of the growing wall.

58

59

SUSPENSION INDUSTRIAL LOFT

SPRING 2013 ARCHITECTURAL TECH. 5 JAY HIBBS

PARTNERS: Susan Bopp, Astry Duarte, Jenny Lin

BRONX, NY

The design for this 68,000 square foot light industrial loft space in the Bronx exemplifies the union between inventive structure and an ethereal working environment. The building effortlessly rises from its foundation on two massive concrete and steel cores, lifting the rectangular seven-story volume up to reveal a spacious and empty ground floor below. The two hefty cores supply the grunt support for a sizable, two-story Howe steel box truss that sits at the roof and from which the floors below hang from slender cylindrical rods suspended from the trusses. Clusters of four cylindrical rods are periodically spaced with the rhythm of the Howe truss throughout the perimeter of each floor plate, alleviating the need for a tighter, standard column grid normally deployed in a typical loft building. The slender rods and wide open floor plates generate the ultimate free plan, allowing for maximum flexibility in both the office and industrial spaces.

Adding to the sense of openness are the full length glass curtain walls that run on the north and south facades, filling the building with ample light and visual exposure. The south façade is a double façade panelized system, capturing heat generated by daily sun exposure and harvesting it to aid in the conditioning of the spaces within. Capping the elevated rectangular volume on the exterior is a three-foot built-out cladding system that runs from the east façade, over the roof and terminating on the west façade. Made of Corten steel panels, the “toupee” as it is called, is punctured by small two-foot square windows that grow exponentially in size as they reach the interior office spaces to flood the floors with dramatic Corbusian light.

60

GROUND LEVEL ENTRY features a public plaza below the suspended mass of the offices above 61

SEVENTH MEZZANINE

SIXTH MEZZANINE SIXTH FLOOR

FIFTH FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR THIRD MEZZANINE THIRD FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

GROUND FLOOR

SEVENTH MEZZANINE

SIXTH MEZZANINE SIXTH FLOOR

FIFTH FLOOR

FOURTH FLOOR THIRD MEZZANINE THIRD FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

GROUND FLOOR

CONCEPTUAL AND TECHNICAL DIAGRAM: Tenant distribution (top) and primary structural support system (bottom) 62

PROGRAM EXPERIENCE: Entry plaza (top left), manufacturing floor (top right) and sixth floor office (bottom) 63

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

LOADING PATH

TENANT ENTRANCE

2

16 17 NORTH FACADE ABOVE

BACK ENTRANCE

E D

UP

UP EMERGENCY EXIT

EMERGENCY EXIT STAIR

STAIR

ELEVATOR

C

FRONT DESK

FRONT DESK

11

1

ELEVATOR

JANITOR’S RM

JANITOR’S RM

MECHANICAL ROOM

MECHANICAL ROOM MECH RM

REVEAL ABOVE

MAIN ENTRANCE

EAST FACADE ABOVE STORAGE ROOM

MECH RM

REVEAL ABOVE

STORAGE TROOM

EAST FACADE ABOVE

STORAGE ROOM

STORAGE TROOM

FOUNDATION BELOW

FOUNDATION BELOW

B

PUBLIC ENTRANCE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

PUBLIC ENTRANCE

5’-0”

A

9

SOUTH (DOUBLE) FACADE ABOVE

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

+130'0"

MECHANICAL

EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISH

+116'0"

ROOF

UNITIZED DOUBLE SKIN CURTAIN WALL

SINGLE GLAZED FACADE UNIT

+95'0"

07 ALUMINUM MULLIONS

+81'0"

06 MEZZ. +74'-0" CORTEEN STEEL CLADDING PANELS

06

+60'-0"

05 +53'-0"

04 MEZZ. +46'-0"

04 SINGLE GLAZED FACADE UNIT

+32'-0"

03

+18'-0"

02 FACADE GLASS GLASS FINS EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISH

+0'-0"

GROUND

-15'-4"

B.O. ELEV. FOUNDATION

16

1017

SOUTH ELEVATION 9

8

7

6

A

5

B

4

C

3

2

D

1 E

E 17D

16

15C

14

B

13A

12

11

10

9

8

EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISH

UNITIZED DOUBLE SKIN CURTAIN WALL

SINGLE GLAZED FACADE UNIT

ALUMINUM MULLIONS

CORTEEN STEEL CLADDING PANELS

SINGLE GLAZED FACADE UNIT

FACADE GLASS GLASS FINS EXPOSED CONCRETE FINISH

NORTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

PLAN + ELEVATION: ground floor plan (top), south elevation (middle) and east and west elevations (bottom) 64

NORTH ELEVATION

7

6

C

1

2 9’-4”

3 16’-4”

4 16’-4”

5

6

16’-4”

7

32’-8”

16’-4”

8

9

16’-4”

16’-4”

10 16’-4”

11 16’-4”

12

13

16’-4”

32’-8”

14 16’-4”

15 16’-4”

16 17 16’-4”

9’-4”

D

6’-10”

TENANT SEPARATION

E

EGRESS PATH

EGRESS PATH

UP

UP DN

DN

23’-6”

STAIR

STAIR

TENANT 2 MANUFACTURE SPACE

TENANT 2 OFFICE

TENANT 1 OFFICE

REVEAL ABOVE ELEVATOR

ELEVATOR

C JANITOR’S RM

OPEN TO BELOW

23’-6”

MECHANICAL ROOM

RESTROOM

JANITOR’S RM MECHANICAL ROOM

REVEAL ABOVE

MECH RM

MECH RM

RESTROOM

RESTROOM

RESTROOM

16’-2”

B A D

TENANT SEPARATION

E

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

+130'0"

MECHANICAL

+117'0"

ROOF

+95'0"

07

+81'-0"

06 MEZZ. +74'-0"

06

+60'-0"

05

+46'-0"

04 +39'-0"

03 MEZZ. +32'-0"

03

+18'-0"

02

+0'-0"

GROUND -8'-2"

B.O. ELEV. EXCAVATION

A

B

C

D

E

A

B

C

D

E

1

2

3

4

PLAN + SECTION: typical plan (top), longitudinal section (middle) and short sections through office and manufacturing spaces (bottom) 65

5

24 GUAGE CORTEN STEEL COPING, COLOR PER SPECIFICATIONS, WITH .040”, MATCHING COLOR, ALUM BUTT PLATE, 6”LONG, CENTERED AT COPING REVEAL 24 GUAGE CORTEN STEEL COPING, STEEL 24 GUAGE CORTEN COPING, COLOR PER SPECIFICATIONS, WITH .040”, COLOR PER SPECIFICATIONS, WITH .040”, 24 GUAGE GALVANIZED STEEL CONTINMATCHING COLOR, ALUM BUTT PLATE, MATCHING COLOR, ALUM BUTT PLATE, UOUSREVEAL COPING CLIP, FINISHED 6”LONG, CENTERED AT COPING 6”LONG, CENTERED AT COPING REVEAL TO MATCH, ATTACHED WITH SS NEOPRENE WASHERED FASTENERS @ 24” O.C. 24 GUAGE GALVANIZED STEEL CONTIN24 GUAGE GALVANIZED STEEL CONTINUOUS COPING CLIP, FINISHED UOUS COPING TO CLIP, FINISHED TO STRUT @ 6” MATCH, ATTACHED WITHATTACHED SS NEOPRENE MATCH, WITH SSHSS NEOPRENE WASHERED FASTENERS @ 24” O.C. WASHERED FASTENERS @ 24” O.C. STEEL PLATE

18 GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL HSS STRUT @ 6”HSS STRUT @ 6” L-FURRING 18 GAUGE BARE18 GALVANIZED STEEL GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL L-FURRING L-FURRING

CFS VERTICAL CHORD STUDS CFS VERTICAL CFS VERTICAL CHORD STUDS CHORD STUDS TYPICAL CFS TRACK

TYPICAL CFS TRACK TYPICALHSS CFSSTRUT TRACK@ 6”

HSS STRUT @ 6”HSS STRUT @ 6”

STEEL PLATE

COPING 1” = 1’0”

STEEL PLATE

COPING 1” = 1’0” COPING 1” = 1’0”

TOUPEE PLAN 1” = 1’0” TOUPEE PLAN TOUPEE PLAN 1” = 1’0” 1” = 1’0”

18 GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL VERTICAL L-FURRING 18 GAUGE BARE18 GALVANIZED STEEL GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL 18 GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL VERTICAL L-FURRING VERTICAL L-FURRING HORIZONTAL C-FURRING GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENERS 18 GAUGE BARE18 GALVANIZED STEEL GAUGE BARE GALVANIZED STEEL HORIZONTAL C-FURRING HORIZONTAL C-FURRING GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENERS GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENERS

BARE GALVANIZED STEEL HORIZONTAL L-CLIP @ EVERY OTHER STUD VERTICAL @ 24” O.C. BARE GALVANIZED STEEL HORIZONTAL BARE GALVANIZED STEEL HORIZONTAL L-CLIP @ EVERYL-CLIP OTHER VERTI@STUD EVERY OTHER STUD VERTICAL @ 24” O.C. CAL @ 24” O.C.

CONNECTION DETAIL I 3” =1’0” CONNECTION DETAIL I CONNECTION DETAIL I 3” =1’0” 3” =1’0”

TOUPEE DETAILS: The 3’ build-out is framed 66

CONNECTION DETAIL II 3” =1’0” CONNECTION DETAIL II CONNECTION DETAIL II 3” =1’0” 3” =1’0”

TOUPEE SECTION THROUGH CFS STUD 1”W-sections = 1’0” TOUPEE SECTION THROUGH TOUPEE SECTION THROUGH between two vertical that hang from CFS STUD CFS STUD 1” = 1’0” 1” = 1’0”

the mega-truss above

TOUPEE SECTION THROU L-FURRING 1”THROUGH = 1’0” TOUPEE SECTION TOUPEE SECTION THROUGH L-FURRING L-FURRING 1” = 1’0” 1” = 1’0”

ALUMINUM GRATE ALUMINUM GRATE FLOORING FLOORING

HORIZONTAL EXTRUSION HORIZONTAL EXTRUSION FOR UPPER UNIT FOR UPPER UNIT

VERTICAL CROSS VERTICAL CROSS BRACING CABLES BRACING CABLES

TRIPLE GLAZEDTRIPLE GLAZED INNER FACADE INNER FACADE

VERTICAL VERTICAL EXTRUSION FOREXTRUSION FOR UPPER UNIT UPPER UNIT

SPANDREL PANEL SPANDREL PANEL 8’ 2”

CONCRETE FLOOR 2 1/2”

3’ 10 1/2”

2 1/2”

3’ 10 1/2”

2 1/2” ADJUSTABLE CURTAIN WALL SUPPORT ALUMINUM MULLION

0’ 6”

TRIPLE GLAZING INNER FACADE

8’ 2”

2 1/2”

3’ 10 1/2”

2 1/2”

3’ 10 1/2”

2 1/2”

CONCRETE FLOOR ADJUSTABLE CURTAIN WALL SUPPORT

0’ 6”

ALUMINUM MULLION

TRIPLE GLAZING INNER FACADE

ALUMINUM GRATE FLOORING

3’ 3”

4’ 3 ”

HORIZONTAL CROSS BRACING CABLES

HORIZONTAL EXTRUSION

0’ 6”

VERTICAL DIAGONAL CABLES

CURTAIN WALL DETAILS: Double-skin facade units (top); double-skin plan detail (bottom) 67

W14X550 TRUSS MEMBER W12X26 JOIST BOLTED CONNECTION PLATE W36X135 GIRDER BOLTED SHEAR TAB BOLTED TRANSFER PLATE L-L FLOORTRUSS DIAGONAL BRACING W14X550 MEMBER W12X26 JOIST BOLTED CONNECTION PLATE W36X135 GIRDER (4) Ø2.25” THREADED STEEL SUSPENSION ROD BOLTED SHEAR TAB STEEL CASEMENT BOLTED TRANSFER PLATE WELDED STIFFENER PLATE L-L FLOOR DIAGONAL BRACING W14X730 TRUSS CHORD W24X103 SECONDARY SUPPORT MEMBER W14X550 W/ WELDED STEEL CAPPING PLATE WELDED PLATE (4) Ø2.25”MOMENT THREADED STEEL SUSPENSION ROD STEEL CASEMENT WELDED STIFFENER PLATE W14X730 TRUSS CHORD W24X103 SECONDARY SUPPORT MEMBER W14X550 W/ WELDED STEEL CAPPING PLATE WELDED MOMENT PLATE

(4) Ø2.25” THREADED STEEL SUSPENSION ROD W12X26 JOIST L-L FLOOR DIAGONAL BRACING W36X135 GIRDER BOLTED SHEAR TAB STEEL CASEMENT BOLTED (4) Ø2.25”TRANSFER THREADEDPLATE STEEL SUSPENSION ROD W12X26 JOIST L-L FLOOR DIAGONAL BRACING W36X135 GIRDER BOLTED SHEAR TAB STEEL CASEMENT W40X278 SECONDARY SUPPORT MEMBER BOLTED TRANSFER PLATE (4) Ø2.25” THREADED STEEL SUSPENSION ROD BOLTED SHEAR TAB BOLTED MOMENT PLATE

W40X278 SECONDARY SUPPORT MEMBER (4) Ø2.25” THREADED STEEL SUSPENSION ROD BOLTED SHEAR TAB BOLTED MOMENT PLATE

STRUCTURAL DETAILS: Suspension detail at mega-truss (top); suspension detail at typical floor (bottom) 68

G

T.O. FINISH FLOOR

ELEVATOR SHAFT OFFICE SPACE

2-

CABLE BEYOND

1'-6" FLOOR FINISH OPAQUE GLASS EDGE T.O. FINISH FLOOR

2-HR RATED WALL ASSEMBL

2-HR RATED CEILING ASSEMBL

16”

CEILING HANGER SYSTEM

B.O. EXTERIOR FINISH CEILING

EXTERIOR CEILING FINISH OPAQUE GLASS EDGE

EXTERIOR FINISH CEILING

B.O. FINISH CEILING 1'-6"

EXTERIOR FI

EXTERIOR EXTERIOR CONCRETE PANEL FINISH

2-HR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY DETAIL AT FLOOR-CORE TRANSITION GROUND FLOOR 1/2” = 1’-0” 1'-6" ELEVATOR SHAFT GLASS EDGE FLOOR FINISH PIN LIGHT GLASS SUPPORT

T.O. FINISH FLOOR SHAFT LINER

STEEL BRACING BEYOND

DEFLECTION TRACK

ELEVATOR SHAFT

DEFLECTION TRACK

2-HR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY

2-HR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY

2-HR RATED CEILING ASSEMBLY

GLASS SUPPORT

SHAFT LINER

INSULATION B.O. FINISH CEILING EXTERIOR FINISH CEILING

PIN LIGHT GLASS EDGE CEILING FINISH

1'-6" DETAIL AT FLOOR-CORE TRANSITION GROUND FLOOR 1/2” = 1’-0”

CEILING + MECHANICAL DETAILS: Mechanial/ceiling integration (top); glass reveal at core detailll (bottom)

DETAIL AT FLOOR-CORE TRANSITION GROUND FLOOR 1 1/2” = 1’-0”

69

CASE STUDY: NCMA

SPRING 2013 ARCHITECTURAL TECH. 4 DAVID WALLANCE

PARTNERS: Blair Dargusch, Sean Franklin, Michelle Mortensen

RALEIGH, NC

This module of the Architectural Technology sequence requires students to dissect an existing building to the level of detail of construction documents, in order to understand architecture at all scales of design and to analyze the integration of building systems relative to one another and to the larger conceptual framework conceived of by the architect.

My group analyzed the north carolina museum of art by Thomas Phifer and Partners Architects, a meticulously detailed art museum known for its highly-engineered daylighting system of fiberglass coffers, UV filters and skylights with shading louvers. Beyond the success of this lighting feature, the building is a highly-controlled exercise in modularity, grids, structural/mechanical integration, materiality and adaptable gallery space.

Our investigation focused on identifying the integration between the building’s enclosure, mechanical, structural and environmental systems.

70

71

1

2 26'-11"

3 26'-0"

4 26'-0"

5 26'-0"

6 26'-0"

7 26'-0"

8 26'-0"

9 26'-0"

10 26'-0"

12

11 26'-0"

26'-0"

13 26'-0"

14 26'-0"

15 26'-0"

16 26'-0"

17 26'-0"

18 26'-11"

27'-4"

A

GALLERY

26'-0"

B SCULPTURE GALLERY

GALLERY

26'-0"

C

26'-0"

D SCULPTURE COURT

SCULPTURE GALLERY

26'-0"

E CENTRAL GALLERY

26'-0"

F

26'-0"

G GALLERY

SCULPTURE GARDEN

GALLERY

ENTRY COURT

CAFE

27'-4"

H ENTRY CANOPY

J

PLANS AND SECTIONS: Gallery level plan (top); transverse section through courtyard (middle); longitudinal section (bottom) 72

1

2 26'-11"

3 26'-0"

4 26'-0"

5 26'-0"

6 26'-0"

7 26'-0"

8 26'-0"

9 26'-0"

10 26'-0"

11 26'-0"

12 26'-0"

13 26'-0"

14 26'-0"

15 26'-0"

16 26'-0"

17 26'-0"

18 26'-11"

27'-4"

A

26'-0"

B LOUVERED SHADING BATHROOM SKYLIGHT

26'-0"

C

OUTDOOR AIR MECHANICAL CONNECTION

26'-0"

D CEILING COFFER BELOW

E 26'-0"

SKYLIGHT

26'-0"

F

26'-0"

G

27'-4"

H

J

PLANS AND SECTIONS: Roof plan (top) 73

STRUCTURAL DETAILS: Typical field column (left); curtain wall column (right) 74

STRUCTURAL DETAILS: Lateral resistance column (left); typical column tree detail (right) 75

INTERIOR DETAILS: Sprinkler integration (top left); ceiling infrastructure (top right); typical gallery wall (bottom) 76

INTERIOR DETAILS: Typical gallery wall exploded assembly (bottom) 77

MECHANICAL DETAILS: Supply and return at gallery wall (top); supply and return at perimeter wall (bottom) 78

MECHANICAL DETAILS: Supply and return integration at perimeter screen wall (bottom) 79

ENCLOSURE DETAILS: Light diffusion screen (top); aluminum panel screen wall (left; screen wall connection detail (right) 80

ENCLOSURE DETAILS: Curtain wall (left); parapet detail at curtain wall (right) 81

WOOD SEATING UNITS

SPRING 2013 CRAFT IN A DIGITAL AGE NATHAN CARTER

This series of projects seeks to explore tools and methodologies of fabrication using more conventional woodshop tools. Each of four seating units addresses specific issues including complex joinery, transformability, bending and multi-body accommodation.

Each project begins with a simple conceptual sketch. These ideas are then moved into a digital model, where concepts are taken through a rigorous series of iterations that seek to refine issues relating to proportion, ergonomics, structural engineering, material definition and constraints, fabrication sequence and constraints, and overall design intent.

82

83

TOP

SIDE

DOVETAIL-LAP HYBRID JOINT

1

2

3

4

5

PINWHEEL CHAIR

MARK POTHIER CRAFT IN A DIGITAL AGE - SPRING 2012

0"

1'-0"

TOP

1

PINWHEEL STOOL 84

5

2

SIDE

2

1'-4"

1'-4"

1'-0"

1'-0"

VETAIL-LAP HYBRID JOINT

SIDE

3

3

PINWHEEL STOOL 85

AT-PACK AME COMPONENT 2. FRAME 1. FLAT-PACK COMPONENT 2. FRAME COMPONENT 3.

2. UNFOLD FRAME COMPONENT 3. UNFOLD 2. FRAME COMPONENT 3. UNFOLD 1. FLAT-PACK 2. FRAME COMPONENT

15-9/16”

15-9/16” 15-9/16”

2. FRAME COMPONENT

3. UNFOLD

4. BACK COMPONENT

5. SLOT AND TAB

15-11/16”

30-11/16”

30-11/16”

30-11/16”

30-11/16”

30-11/16”

30-11/16”

15-11/16”

16”

4.

3. BACK UNFOLD COMPONENT 4. BACK 3. UNFOLD COMPONENT 4. BACK COMPONENT 4.5.BACK SLOTCOMPONENT AND TAB 5.4.

SLOT BACK AND COMPONENT TAB 5. SLOT 3. UNFOLD 4. BACK COMPONE

12”

12”

12”

12”

12”

12”

ME PACK KE-FRAME AIRFLAT-PACK CHAIR BIKE-FRAME FLAT-PACK CHAIRFLAT-PACK CHAIR CHAIR BIKE-FRAME FLAT-PACK CHAIR RK POTHIER MARK POTHIER

MARK POTHIER AFT G AL2012 AGE IN A- DIGITAL SPRING CRAFT AGE 2012 IN-ASPRING DIGITAL2012 AGE - SPRING 2012 CRAFT IN A DIGITAL AGE - SPRING 2012

MITERED BUTT JOINT

MITERED LAP JOINTMITERED LAP JOINT

MITERED LAP JOINT MITERED LAP JOINT

MITERED BUTT JOINT

MITERED LAP JOINT MITERED LAP JOINT

30-11/16”

12”

ACK CHAIR

2012 BIKE-FRAME FLAT-PACK CHAIR 86

MITERED BUTT JOINT MITERED LAP JOINT

MITERE JOINT

BIKE-FRAME FLAT-PACK CHAIR 87

25-7/8”

8”

14”

x6

R9-5/8”

/8”

7-1/2”

2”

x4

1”

5-1

1” R8-5/8”

18”

23-3/8”

2”

2”

/8”

5-1

x6x6

25-7/8”

14”

8”

R9-5/8”

18”

23-3/8”

/8”

BENT LAMINATION CHAIR 88

2”

8”

5-1

7-1/2”

/ 5-1

R8-5/8”

2”

1”

x4

x4

BENT LAMINATION CHAIR 89

x4

x4 x2

x6

x8

x4

x6

x8

12” 42”

1-1/2” 1”

1”

18”

36” 38”

DOUBLE-TAPER BENCH 90

9”

DOUBLE-TAPER BENCH 91

92

93

FY-LANGES

BY FY! NEW YORK, NY

SPRING 2012 FAST PACE // SLOW SPACE M. BEARAK + B. BORDERS

PARTNERS: Rand Abdul-Jabbar, Aisha Alsager, Susan Bopp, Justin Fabrikant, Rikki Frenkel, Joanne Hayek, Elektra Kontoroupi, Nick Reiter, Jennifer Romeo

Architizer A+ Awards Special Mention

FY-Langes is an interactive spatial installation designed and built by 10 students at Columbia University’s GSAPP. FY-Langes was on display on campus at the end of year show in May 2012, and was selected as part of the FIGMENT NYC project that took place on Governor’s Island, New York June 9-10th, 2012.

The system is built entirely of packing foam which was transformed into its constructed system through digital scripting and fabrication processes. The overall form is derived from a series of unrolled strands of phalanges, each of which is looped over on itself to form one unit bale. Multiple bales are connected through a tabbing system integrated within the scripting and fabrication processes. The parametric nature of the design-to-fabrication sequence allowed the team to sculpt the final installation piece all the way up to fabrication time. A nesting strategy during fabrication also provided the project with 99% material efficiency.

FY-Langes is designed to be a flexible, adaptable and reconfigurable system in the sense that it can have a life beyond the initially designed form while still maintaining its initial design intent of tactility, responsiveness and user-generated interaction. Its strands can be used collectively to build a composite form or can work on their own. It is also adaptable and flexible in the way it can be staged in any particular site. Other uses include but are not limited to: wall/ceiling installations, furniture, outdoor components.

94

95

DESIGN SURFACES

NESTED CUT FILES

FORM TO FABRICATION: To generate the form, three input surfaces are required, corresponding to the bottom of the bale, top of the bale, and top of the phalanges. Our script offers the capability to easily customize the form by manipulating these three surfaces and thus the proportions of the bale units.

96

ASSEMBLED BALES

97

ASSEMBLED BALE

BALE ORGANIZATION: A total of 561 bales were organized through alpha-numeric naming conventions governed by the bale typology (end, transition, seating) and its grid location by row and column.

98

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

T = TAB S = SLOT

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

T = TAB S = SLOT

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

S

T

S T

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S T

S

T

S T

T

S

S T

S

S

S

T

S T

S

T

T

S

S

S T

S T

T S

S

T

S

S T T

S T

T

S T

T

S

T

S T

S T

T

T

S

S

S T

S

S S

S T

S

S

S S S

S

S

S

S

S

S S

S T T

S

S T

S T

S T

S

S T

S T

S

T

S T

T

T

S

T

S T S

S

S S

S T

S T

S T T

T

S S

S T

S T

S

T

S T

S

T

S T

S T

T

T

T

T

S T

S

T S S

S

S T

S

S

T

T

S

S

T

S T

T

S S

T

S

S T

S T S

S T

S T S

S

S T

S T

S

S T

S T

S T

S T

S T

S T

S

S S

TABBING SYSTEM: Tabs and slots were used for both intra-bale assembly and inter-bale connections; our scripting algorithm created the location and T = TAB

S = SLOT alignment for bales to connect to one another with proper adjacency.

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S

T

S T

T

S

T

S T

S T

S T

S T

T

S

S

S

T

S T

T

S

T

S T

S T

S

S S

T

S T

S T

S

S

S T

S T

S

S

T

S T

S

T

T

S T T

S

T

S T

S T

S

S T

S T

S T

S T

S T

T

S

S S

S

S S

S T

S

S

S

T

S T

T

S

T

S

S T

S T

S T

S T

S

S T

S T

S

S T

S T

S T

S T

S T

S T

S

S S

99

FY-LANGES as configured for display in front of Avery Hall, Columbia University

FY-LANGES are enjoyed by children and adults alike; here, exhibited on Governor’s Island for the Figment NYC festival.

100

FY-LANGES exhibited in front of Avery Hall for the 2012 End of Year Show 101

AQUATIC RESEARCH PLATFORM

SPRING 2012 BEYOND PROTOTYPE JASON IVALIOTIS

PARTNERS: Andrew Maier, Ping Pai, Alejandro Stein

The Aquatic Research Platform is a floating observatory that controls human interaction with marine life. The cellular mesh forms a porous surface where aperture size controls engagement with the water. The areas that rise above the surface of the water contain larger apertures that allow users to pass through the net-like platform and engage with marine life. The submerged areas of the platform contain smaller apertures to provide a smoother walking surface and a protective barrier between human inhabitants and the more dangerous aquatic life forms.

To provide for a smooth walking and climbing surface that is appropriate to this type of marine application, the folded panels conceal all hardware connections within the interior of the connective geometry between cells.

The initial analogue studies focused on the generation of a cellular network formed from minimal cutting and folding. The base geometry was created with triangular cells formed from three simple panels. Each panel contains only three folds and fastens to adjacent panels to form a triangular cell with a central aperture. The geometry of the folded mesh is generated by several parametric definitions in Grasshopper where the opening and closing of the triangular aperture responds to the humanto-marine life interface desired. Distance based attractors are employed to control the opening and closing of the apertures as well as the overall depth of the cellular construct.

102

PROTOTYPE MODULE, full scale; 1/4” acrylic, heat-bent 103

SUB-MODULE BENDING

INTRA-MODULE ASSEMBLY

INTER-MODULE ASSEMBLY

MODULE CONFIGURATION: Each triangular module is composed of three sub-modules, which interlock with one another in order to provide inherent rigidity and to conceal hardware connections.

104

FABRICATION ASSEMBLY: (1) Heat-bending tabs to proper angles; (2) Fastening the three sub-modules with concealed hardware; (3) Connecting one module to another using pre-drilled access holes for hardware fastening

105

LONGITUDINAL SECTION: The platform porosity changes with the required function, controlled by varying the aperture size of modules. Module depth is also varied to tune the necessary buoyant forces.

SURFACE TESSELATION AND EXTRACTION FOR FABRICATION

106

107

MY [METABALL]

FALL 2011 PARAMETRIC REALIZATIONS M. BEARAK + B. BORDERS

PARTNERS: Blair Dargusch, Rong Zhao

In focusing to achieve full parametricity with digital fabrication, My[Metaball] offers a unique product in each generation as created by consumer-defined input. As a storage vessel, it can accept a variety of personal products (e.g. mobile phones, hard drives, desk items) for storage; consumers can further customize their container by controlling product organization and metaball amplitude. This possibility is governed by parametricity in grasshopper.

My[Metaball] is available in a variety of slat and mounting rod finishes; prototypes (pictured) are constructed of 1/4” oak plywood, lasercut and finished with stain and polyurethane. Mounting rods are custom 3/8” hollow aluminum with 1/2” hollow aluminum spacers. My[Metaball] can be wall-mounted or hung, vertically or horizontally.

108

ITERATIVE PROTOTYPES, full scale; 1/4” lasercut birch plywood, 3/8” hollow aluminum rod and 1/2” hollow aluminum spacers 109

ITERATIVE CAPACITY: the definition for My[Metaball] accepts any geometry input by a client and allows further manipulation of storage placement, yielding complete customization of size and form

110

FINAL USE: the storage unit can be installed both vertically or horizontally given bracing at both ends of the aluminum rod; stored items are secured in either orientation, as one must rotate open the slats in the correct order to retrieve their item

111

DRAWING AND REPRESENTATION II

SPRING 2012 ARCH. DRAWING + REP. II B. BRYAN + M. YOUNG

This intensive drawing course placed emphasis on communication through drawing techniques and various means of graphic representation.

The point of departure for the first sequence of drawings is an existing digital model of a building precedent—here, Renzo Piano’s Le Centre Culturel Tjibaou—and analyzing the singular qualities of its composition through generative, measured drawing. The point of departure for second sequence of drawings derives from a short cinematic sequence from Jacques Tati’s film Mon Oncle, exploring Tati’s careful use of polyfocal composition through both cinematic geometry and color.

Tools used to explore these ideas included Grasshopper, After Effects, Photoshop and Illustrator, focusing on the construction of generative processes to create populational influence from the agents of Tati’s film techniques.

112

113

SEQUENCE 1 DRAWING 2: horizontal banding in the building’s tectonic skin becomes repurposed as a poly-scalar measuring device as a series of plan cuts are drawn at the corresponding radius marker

114

SEQUENCE 1 DRAWING 3: perceived sequence of perspective when moving around the building becomes conflated with expansion and contraction of the building’s primary vertical ribs of structure

115

SEQUENCE 2 DRAWING 1: the first drawing to translate the poly-focal nature of Tati’s cinematic technique into still image, here though tracing the movement of boldly-colored agents throughout the film sequence and overlaying a contrast of focus and out-of-focus

116

SEQUENCE 2 DRAWING 3: the same flux of multiple focal agents is translated into a field condition interrupted by the proximity and magnitude of the focal movements

117

SEQUENCE 2 DRAWING 4: the additional parameter of color and coagulation is integrated to produce an effect of “build-up” or history of the field throughout the process of focal fluctuation

118

SEQUENCE 2 DRAWING 6: the resultant generative response of previous iterations is reconstructed as a heat map which signifies the areas of greatest focal flux and pools of blur

119

ENCODED MATTER: ENTROPY[BODYN]

FALL 2011 ENCODED MATTER EZIO BLASETTI

Generation: Form generation occurs in three steps of Python scripting, the latter two generated from the previous step. In the first step, a global rose curve function is applied to a spherical agent array, defining movement by the interaction of self-attracting agent behavior with global equation vectors.

Structure: Average curves from the first step are chosen as generators for the second step, which features a circular array of agents derived from the endpoints of the first step curves. The behavior of these secondary agents are a combination of self-attracting particles (i.e. three-body system) and carefully-tuned tangent and normal vectors from the generator curves.

Surface: Surface is interpolated from the secondary curves simply by connecting control points with proximal neighbors, given a maximum and minimum search radius; density is defined by rebuild points and number of proximal neighbors.

120

121

GENERATION: inital base curve generation is derived in Python using design-determined functions and algorithms 122

123

STRUCTURE: attractor based agents engage in a swarm behavior while following the generated base curves, creating a dense field of structure 124

125

SURFACE: proximity and neighbor-agent relationships connect and reinforce the structure to create thickened conditions of [occupiable] surface 126

127

ANIMATED ORIGAMI

SPRING 2012 ANIMATED COMPUTATION 02 CHRISTOPHER WHITELAW

This visual study was an exploration of Maya’s nDynamics engine and capacity to inform design through manipulation of geometry using properties of material and physics. My effort focused on the ability to create the properties of a folded tessellation structure in a parametric environment and to test the system to understand its physical and structural behaviors.

Testing was undertaken through a series of specific force analysis to better control each system in isolation. These forces include stretching, wind resistance, structural arching and bending

128

129

STRETCHING (SEQUENCE A) AND BENDING (SEQUENCE B)

130

A_180

B_104

A_195

B_134

A_225

B_195

C_393

D_29

C_331

D_44

C_271

D_104

STRUCTURAL ARCHING (SEQUENCE C) AND BENDING SEQUENCE D)

131

MILLS DISTRICT SOUTH

2013 ULI-HINES COMPETITION Honorable Mention

PARTNERS: Dan Choi, Suk Hwang, Eivind Karlsen, Justine Shapiro-Kline

Minneapolis, MN

Three principal agents currently define Mills District South: the emerging arts and cultural district along the Mississippi riverfront to the north, the central business district bracketing Nicollet Mall to the west, and the Metrodome Stadium at the east. Mills District South’s future growth depends on its ability to link arts with business, while at the same time accommodating both the daily needs of a local, residential population and those of a regional, touristic population, visiting to experience entertainment and recreation.

The future neighborhood of Mills District South draws on the existing anchors and exploits untapped synergies to create multifaceted and sustainable development that brings much-needed density and residential growth to Minneapolis’ geographically compact downtown. It strikes a balance between the need for climate-controlled interior public spaces and outdoor open spaces that accommodate the game day surge of visitors.

It strategically integrates vehicular parking and prioritizes bicycle and pedestrian circulation. It combines sensitive infill housing with fullblock development sites in order to amplify the neighborhood’s existing strengths while laying the foundation for an identity that is distinct yet complementary to that of Downtown West. Finally, it exemplifies the height and density that will allow Minneapolis to reach its target downtown population in the coming decades and sets a high bar with its energy efficient buildings and district heating strategy.

132

133

1

2

1

2

2

1 2

RETAIL ARACDE

1

2

1

2

2

1 3 RETAIL ARACDE

2

1

3

2

CINEPLEX, BAR/RESTAU2 RANTS

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK

1

1

RETAIL ARACDE

1

2

1

2 2

LIGHT-RAIL STATION

2

MILLS SOUTH PARK

5TH STREET BOULEVARD

GAME DAY PLAZA

ARMORY CITY HALL PLAZA

TAIL-GATE PARKING

TAIL-GATE PARKING

2

5 RETAIL ARACDE

PLAZA

1

4

3

1

2 1

2

4

KEY 1.

2.

3.

4.

HIGH-RISE CONDOMINIUM MID-RISE RENTAL CLASS A OFFICE MEDICAL OFFICE

1

2

5

MASTER PLAN: The development area consists of fifteen city blocks located in East Downtown, Minneapolis, in the vicinity of the future new Vikings Stadium

134

URBAN STRATEGY: (Upper left) Adaptive re-use as the centerpiece for a new mixed-use corridor; (Upper right) Linking the central business district and Mississippi riverfront through a community landscape; (Bottom) Promoting healthy lifestyle through bike and transit

135

RESIDENTIAL PHASE 1 : RENTAL - 3,129,868 SF AFFORDABLE RENTAL - 100,000 SF PHASE 2 : RENTAL - 115,500 SF CONDO - 2,654,819 SF

OFFICE (GENERIC) PHASE 1 : 568,896 SF PHASE 2 : 569,901 SF

OFFICE (MEDICAL) PHASE 1 : 0 SF PHASE 2 : 237,098 SF PROGRAM + PHASING: Strategic two-part phasing allows the development to gain critical momentum through early residential and retail programming

10

10

10

13 3

1 2

SECTIONAL STRATEGY exhibits integration of parking, retail and office program, and green space within the mixed-use development.

136

4

3

5 7

RETAIL PHASE 1 : 779,911 SF PHASE 2 : 129,950 SF

PARKING PHASE 1 : 440,478 SF PHASE 2 : 377,572 SF

HOTEL PHASE 1 : 311,172 SF PHASE 2 : 200,000 SF

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

10

12

6

7

8

9

11

OFFICE LOBBY OFFICE/RESIDENTIAL PARKING RETAIL TENANT PUBLIC ARCADE W/ RETRACTABLE ROOF RESIDENT AMENITY PERMEABLE PAVERS AS TRAFFIC-SLOWING CUE BICYCLE PARKING ACCESSBILE RESIDENTIAL UNITS DEDICATED RESIDENTIAL PARKING GREEN ROOFTOP RESIDENTIAL TOWER W/ RETAIL BASE OCCUPIABLE ROOFTOP GREEN SPACE PASSIVE VENTILATION (SUMMER), PASSIVE HEATING (WINTER)

7

137

AERIAL MASSING depicting the proposed high-level of mixed-use density to be introduced to East Downtown, Minneapolis

138

COMMUNITY + DESTINATION: (Top) Fifth Street becomes a pedestrian-friendly boulevard linking East Downtown with the city’s central business district, revitalizing the area’s economy with new rmixed-use development; (Bottom) A central plaza acts as a connective hub between the Mills District South community, central business district, the new Vikings stadium, and the riverfront

139

STUDIOS ARCHITECTURE

SUMMER 2012 ARCH. INTERNSHIP

New York, NY

An internship at the STUDIOS Architecture office in Soho, New York afforded me a diversified and in-depth involvement on a large-scale interior architecture project. Working in coordination with the base building architect, the STUDIOS project team developed a fifteenfloor, 700,000 sf office headquarters design package within a future commercial tower planned near NewYork’s High Line. Our scope involved my intensive participation in conceptual design, schematic design, and design development drawings using Revit Architecture.

With an increased level of responsibility and participation, I was able to engage in the project at a range of scales: large-scale coordination efforts with the base building architect, programming, spatial design concepts, design presentations to the client, component design details, detailed sections and elevations, material specifications, detail drawings, and material sample mock-ups. Understanding the project from multiple scales of effort and intent was a tremendous benefit to my knowledge of architectural practice and was the result of a rigorous internship experience with a motivated project team.

140

ENTRY LEVEL PLAN AND ATRIUM ELEVATIONS 141

FF - 2"

TD MTL SPANDREL CAP

No.

Description

Key Plan

FF - 8"

ONC. FLYOVER BEAM BOXED TIGHT FINISHED TO MATCH GYP. BD. OWER SPANDREL

FF - 2"

ONCRETE COLUMN

09

06

08

05

STUD WALL

FF - 8" INTERIOR SPANDREL CONSTRUCTION N.I.C.

TOP AND BOTTOM SPANDRELS TO MATCH ATRIUM

07

OLID WD. & MTL. CREEN AT MAKE-UP IR WALL

04

3/4" THK. CLEAR LAMINATED GLASS ATR IUM

FF - 8"

RAISED FLOOR N.I.C. CON FER ENC E

ROO M Issue Date:

08/17/12

Project No. Drawn By

Author

Sheet Number

3

HYE -TC -A5-3604

STONE VENEER OVER DBL. HEIGHT CONFERENCE SPANDREL CORNER CORE WALL 2 A5-3301

SCALE:

Drawing Title

METAL TRIM: (3) EQUAL DIVISIONS

MET

ATRIUM SECTIONS

EQ. TYP EQ. TYP

0 EQ. TYP

4'

8'

ALIGN

METAL TRIM: (3) EQUAL DIVISIONS

ALIGN

R C – 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SUBMISSION – CORE & SHELL – 17 AUGUST 2012

Drawing Number

A5-3604

16'

15 A6-3101

OPEN TO BEYOND

EQ. TYP

TENANT LOGO

© 2012 KOHN PEDERSEN FOX ASSOCIATES PC

METAL TRIM AT OPENING, CO-MT1,TYP.

LEVEL 3 78' - 6"

1 A5-3304

GROUT BUTT JOINT WITHIN METAL TRIM MODULE, TYP.

C19.7

VISIONS

C19 METAL TRIM: (6) EQUAL DIVISIONS

V.I.F.

LINE OF CEILING IN FOREGROUND SHOWN DASHED PAINTED GYP CEILING

2 A5-3304

ALIGN

15 A6-3101

ALIGN

STONE VENEER OVER CORE WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP. 6 A5-3301

OPEN TO BEYOND

METAL TRIM JOINT, CO-MT1 TYP. TENANT "A" TURNSTILES

(9) EQUAL DIVISIONS

SHAFT WALL, EGEND TYP.

16 A6-3101

LEVEL OF FINISHED FLOOR BEYOND POLYESTER PANEL WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP. 4

3 A5-3306

ALIGN

CO-MT1,TYP.

LEVEL 02 60' - 6"

ACCESS TO ADA AND SERVICE ELEVATOR LINE OF CEILING IN METAL FINISH AT OPENING, CO-MT1 FOREGROUND SHOWN DASHED STONE VENEER WALL BEYOND UNDERSIDE OF CEILING (SHOWN DASHED)

LEVEL 01 - LOBBY 40' - 6"

OPEN TO BEYOND

A5-3306

POLYESTER PANEL WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP. TENANT LOGO

OPEN TO BEYOND

METAL WALL JOINT, CO-MT1, TYP.

18' - 0"

ALIGN

ALIGN

2 A5-3306

(5) EQUAL PANEL DIVISIONS

OPEN TO BEYOND

YP

METAL TRIM JOINT, CO-MT1 TYP. TENANT "A" TURNSTILES

STONE VENEER OVER SHAFT WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND TYP.

LOBBY - NORTH ELEVATION

SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 A5-3301

EXTENT OF POLYESTER PANEL WALL BEYOND

(6) EQUAL PANEL DIVISIONS IN ELEVATOR LOBBY

1

POLYESTER PANEL WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP. RECEPTION DESK, POLYESTER FINISH

1 A5-3304

GROUT BUTT JOINT WITHIN METAL TRIM MODULE, TYP.

3 A5-3301

LINE OF CEILING IN FOREGROUND SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES

MUD SET STONE FLOORING

PRELIMI NOT F CONSTRU

11714.03

LEVEL 00 - 30TH STREET 16' - 0"

STONE FLOOR ON MUDSET STONE VENEER OVER SHAFT WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP. STONE FLOOR ON MUDSET

2 A5-3304

LEVEL 01 - LOBBY 40' - 6"

LINE OF CEILING IN FOREGROUND SHOWN DASHED

METAL CLAD TURNSTILES, CO-MT1, SEE FINISH SCHEDULE, TYP.

INTERIOR ELEVATIONS: Contributed in the design package for the client’s leasing zone, including atrium design specifications, materials, METALdevelopment PANEL JOINT, COUNDERSIDE OF CEILING 6

MT1, TYP.

STONE VENEER OVER CORE WALL, SEE FINISH LEGEND, TYP.

2

16 A6-3101

LOBBY ELEVATION AT RECEPTION WALL

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

ALIGN

142 ALIGN

ANEL WALL, SEE D, TYP.

interior architectural elements, and test fits.

GROUT JOINT TO MATCH STONE

METAL TRIM, CO-MT1, TYP.

A5-3306

3

LOBBY ELEVATION AT ELEVATOR PO

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

6

SOAP DISPENSER RESERVOIR FINISHED FLOOR AS SCHEDULED CONCEALED IN WALL FINISHED FLOOR AS SCHEDULED

6

ACE VANITY BELOW

SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE

9

2'

NLESS STL TRIM TO LENS ASTENER SOLID SURFACE VANITY BELOW OSTED ACRYLIC

DETAIL SECTION @ VANITY MILLWORK

7

7

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

DETAIL SECTION @ VANITY MILLWORK

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

6"

6"

11"

FINISHED FLOOR AS SCHEDULED

11"

DETAIL - VANITY SECTION @ RECEPTACLE

8

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

DETAIL - VANITY SECTION @ RECEPTACLE

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

DE

SCALE: 1 1/2 GWB. CEILING GWB. ASCEILING SCHEDULED AS SCHEDULED

LTION AS SPECIFIED WALL AS SPECIFIED GWB. BOX OUT LIGHT COVE

COUPLING AND THREADED ROD TO STRUCTURE

1/4" MIRROR 1/4" GLASS MIRROR LAMINATED GLASS LAMINATED TO WALL TO WALL PLENUM BOX

BLOCKING AS REQ'D. COUPLING AND THREADED GWB. CEILING GWB. ASCEILING SCHEDULED ASSTRUCTURE SCHEDULED ROD TO SCHEDULED FLUSH MOUNTED BLOCKING AS REQ'D. FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE 1/4" SEALANT 1/4"AND SEALANT BACKER ANDROD BACKER ROD

PLENUM BOX

GROUT ASGROUT SPECIFIED AS SPECIFIED ALUMINUM ANGLE BRACKET ALONG LENGTH OF FIXTURE PARTITIONPARTITION WALL AS SPECIFIED WALL AS SPECIFIED

8"

SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL TILE SCHEDULED GWB. CEILING AND SUSPENSION

3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE 3/4" THK. SOLID BAG SURFACE BAG SHELF INTEGRAL TO VANITY;TO VANITY; SHELF INTEGRAL PROFILE TO MATCHTO SINK FIXTURE PROFILE MATCH SINK FIXTURE EQ

CO-EQ-02 TYP

5"

2' - 3" REQ'D 9"

9" 7

A6-4101

A6-4101

WALL-MOUNTED WASTE RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE

7

7 15 PLAN DETAIL @ RESTROOM STILE END

15

EQ

5" 2' - 3"

2' - 8"

CO-CT1 CO-CT1

= 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3"SCALE:

TOP OF F.F.

TOILET PARTITION CO-SS1

TYP

3

5' - 9"

EQ

TYP

- STRIP- STRIP LIGHTLIGHT @ CEILING @ CEILING 10 DETAIL 10 DETAIL

1

A6-4102

6

7 A6-4101

TOP OF 3/4"F.F. THK. SOLID 3/4" THK. SURFACE SOLID OVER SURFACE 3/4" OVER 3/4"

9"

1' - 10 1/2"

6"

1' - 4 1/8"

2' - 7 3/4"

EQ 2' - 7 3/4"

12

SCALE:

TEL: 212.530.9300 FAX: 212.269.5894

4

15

6"

Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Protection CO-TA-3 Jaros Baum & Bolles Consulting Engineers 80 Pine Street TYP

WALL-MOUNTED WASTE RECEPTACLE ENCLOSURE

A6-4101

S

1/2" = 1'-0"1New 1/2"York, = 1'-0" SCALE: 1 SCALE: NY 10013

Tenant Architect Studios Architecture 588 Broadway, Suite 702 New York, NY 10012 TEL: 212.431.4512 FAX: 212.431.6042

TYP. VANITY ELEVATION

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL CERAMIC TILE WALL FINISHTILE FINISH EXTENDEDEXTENDED TO TOP OFTO COVE TOP OF COVE

- VENTILATION - VENTILATION GRATEGRATE @ RESTROOM @ RESTROOM 11 DETAIL 11 DETAIL

3 A4-4101

A6-4101

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED PARTITIONPARTITION

6"

EQ

2"

3' - 4"

CO-PF-3

6"

SEALANT AND SEALANT BACKER ANDROD BACKER ROD

CO-TA-6

Architect Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates PC Architects & Planning Consultants CO-PF-3 11 West 42nd Street TYP New York, New York 10036 TEL: 212.977.6500 FAX: 212.956.2526 Structural Engineer CO-EQ-02 Thornton Tomasetti, Inc. TYP 51 Madison Avenue CO-PF-4 New York, NY 10010 TYP FAX 718.661.7801 TEL: 917.661.7800

SELF-RIMMING PORCELAIN SINK

TOP OF F.F.

A6-4101

2 3/4"

Oxford Properties Group 320 Park Avenue, 17th Floor 1-5/8" FRAMING 1-5/8"W/ FRAMING GYP. W/ GYP. New York, NY 10022 BOARD BOARD ENCLOSURE TEL:ENCLOSURE 212.986.7514 FAX: 212.986.7510

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL CERAMIC TILE WALL TILE

15

A6-4102

A6-4101

ELEVATION AT MEN'S RESTROOM

CLEARANCE GWB. KNEE CEILING GWB. ASCEILING SCHEDULED AS SCHEDULED

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED GWB. CEILING GWB. CEILINGPROJECTED BAG SHELF AND SUSPENSION AND SUSPENSION

5' - 9"

1

2 3/4"

Client CO-TA-6 Related Companies 60 Columbus Circle New York, NY 10023 TEL: 212.801.1000 FAX 212.801.1048

TYP

5/8" GYP. BOARD 5/8" GYP. OVER BOARD MTL.OVER STUDS MTL. STUDS PAINTED WHITE PAINTED WHITE

EQ 8"

3 A4-4101

A6-4101

CO-GL3

14 A6-4101

OPENING TO RECEPTACLE

CO-SS1

EXHAUST GRILLE EXHAUST GRILLE TOWER C – 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SUBMISSI

EQ

8

ALIGN

3/8" THK FROSTED 3/8" THK ACRYLIC FROSTED ACRYLIC LENS LENS

PLENUM BOX PLENUM BOX EXHAUST DUCT EXHAUST DUCT

EQ

TYP

ALIGN

CONT. STAINLESS CONT. STAINLESS STL TRIM TO STL TRIM TO CONCEAL FASTENER CONCEAL FASTENER TRIM AND LENS TRIM AND AT SIDE LENS WALL AT SIDE WALL BEYOND BEYOND

No. Key Plan

5 A6-4101

RESTROOM ENLARGED VANITY

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

PLYWOOD PLYWOOD BAG SHELFBAG SHELF

DROP-IN SINK DROP-IN AS SCHEDULED SINK AS SCHEDULED SEAMLESSSEAMLESS SOLID SURFACE SOLID COUNTERTOP SURFACE COUNTERTOP OVER OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD 3/4" PLYWOOD

ELEVATION AT WOMEN'S RESTROOM

FINISH CERAMIC FINISHTILE CERAMIC W/ GROUT TILE W/ ASGROUT SCHEDULED AS SCHEDULED

DETAIL DRAWINGS: Detailed spaces within the interior architecture package in collaboration with base building architect.

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED PARTITIONPARTITION

-0"

CO-SS1

EQ

2x2x1/4" ALUM. 2x2x1/4" ANGLE ALUM. ANGLE

1' - 6"

BLE

CO-TA-4

CO-SS1

143

TUBE STEEL TUBE SUPPORT STEEL SUPPORT

4"

RS S &SECURE KICKERS SECURE CO-TA-5 VE TURE ABOVE

DE

SCALE: 6" =

TOWER C – 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT S

PAPER TOWEL INDICATOR DECAL @ MIRROR

SEALANT AND SEALANT BACKER ANDROD BACKER ROD

16

1' - 10 1/2" PLAN DETAIL @ RESTROOM STILE END 1' - 4 1/8"

ALUMINUMALUMINUM ANGLE BRACKET ANGLE BRACKET ALONG LENGTH ALONG OFLENGTH FIXTURE OF FIXTURE

TOILET PARTITION CO-SS1 CO-PF-4 TYP

PRIVACY DIVIDER CO-SS1

8

SCALE:

501 WEST 30TH STREET = 1'-0"YORK, NY SCALE: 3"NEW

8"

CO-TA-3

Tenant Ar Studios Ar 588 Broad New York TEL: 212.

1/4" SOLID SURFACE OVER HONEYCOMB PANEL END STILE

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

SUSPENDED SUSPENDED GWB. CEILING GWB. CEILING AS SCHEDULED AS SCHEDULED CO-SS1

b

3

6

1/4" SOLID SURFACE OVER HONEYCOMB PANEL END STILE WHITE SILICONE CAULK AND BACKER ROD 11"

6" 11"

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED FLUSH MOUNTED FLUSH MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE LIGHT FIXTURE

CO-EQ-02 TYP

Mechanica Jaros Baum 80 Pine St New York TEL: 212.

CO-SS1

ENLARGED RESTROOM RCP - TYPICAL FLOOR CONT. MTL.CONT. ANGLE MTL. ANGLE

CO-CT1

WALL-MOUNTED WASTE RECEPTACLE WALL-MOUNTED WASTE RECEPTACLE FINISH CERAMIC TILE W/ GROUT AS SCHEDULED ENCLOSURE, 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE ENCLOSURE, 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE SCHEDULED PARTITION OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD. CONFIRM INTERIOR OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD. CONFIRM INTERIOR DIMENSIONS W/ PROFILE SPECIFIED WASTEBASKET DIMENSIONS W/ SPECIFIED WASTEBASKET STAINLESS STEEL CORNER CO-CT1 & BLOCKING FRAMING &FRAMING BLOCKING AS REQ'D AS REQ'D CO-CT1 SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE STAINLESS STEEL CORNER PROFILE WHITE SILICONE CAULK AND AS BACKER ROD FINISHED SCHEDULED FINISHED FLOOR AS FLOOR SCHEDULED

= 1'-0" SCALE: 1" SCALE: 1 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1/2" = 1'-0"

BLOCKING BLOCKING AS REQ'D. AS REQ'D.

EQ

Architect Kohn Pede Planning C 11 West 4 New York TEL: 212.

Structural Thornton T 51 Madiso New York TEL: 917.

HUDSON YARDS TOWER C DETAIL DETAIL - VANITY - VANITY SECTION SECTION @ RECEPTACLE @ RECEPTACLE TYP. VANITY ELEVATION

COUPLINGCOUPLING AND THREADED AND THREADED ROD TO STRUCTURE ROD TO STRUCTURE

SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

-0"

TYP

2' - 3"

3' - 4"

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

Oxford Pr 320 Park A New York TEL: 212.

@ MIRROR TUBE STEEL SUPPORT TUBE STEEL SUPPORT

DETAIL SECTION @ VANITY RECEPTACLE

CONCEALED, CONCEALED, COUNTERSUNK COUNTERSUNK FASTENERFASTENER

11

PAPER TOWEL INDICATOR DECAL

8"

TOP OF F.F.

A6-4101

LED LIGHT LED FIXTURES LIGHT TBD FIXTURES TBD CO-GL3

1

8"

PORCELAIN SINK

6"

9 FINISHED FLOOR AS SCHEDULED

DETAIL SECTION @ VANITY EQ RECEPTACLE EQ

MTL. STUDMTL. FRAMING STUD FRAMING SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" @ BOX OUT@ BOX OUT

TYP

2' - 8"

FINISHED FLOOR AS SCHEDULED SPECIFIED WASTEBASKET; COORDINATE W/ INTERIOR ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS

CO-CL1

9"

14

GWB. BOX GWB. OUT LIGHT BOX OUT COVE LIGHT COVE

CO-CT1

TYP

2"

2' - 10"

2' - 10" 2' - 3" REQ'D

2' - 3" REQ'D

1' - 0" DETAIL SECTION SECTION @ VANITY @ VANITY MILLWORK MILLWORK 6 DETAIL

14

Client Related Co 60 Columb New York TEL: 212.

CONCEALED CABINET HINGE CONCEALED CABINET HINGE FINISH CERAMIC TILE W/ GROUT AS SCHEDULED 2010 ADA REQUIRED 2010 ADA REQUIRED KNEE AND KNEE TOE AND TOE SELF-RIMMING SCHEDULED PARTITION CLEARANCE CLEARANCE

CO-PF-3

3/4" AS THK. SOLIDASSURFACE OVER 3/4" FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR SCHEDULED SCHEDULED PLYWOOD ENCLOSURE; WHITE MELAMINE FINISH ON CABINET INTERIOR 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE OVER 3/4" SPECIFIED WASTEBASKET; PLYWOOD ENCLOSURE; WHITE MELAMINE COORDINATE W/ INTERIOR FINISH ON CABINET INTERIORENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS

8' - 4"

EQ

EQ EQ 1/2" = 1'-0"1 1/2" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1 SCALE: 1' - 0"

CO-CL1

" AIR SLOT

TUBE STEEL SUPPORT OPERABLE ACCESS SCHEDULED OPERABLE ACCESS PANEL: SCHEDULED 2x2x1/4" ALUM. ANGLE PANEL: CERAMIC TILE OVERTILE 3/4" PLYWOOD W/ CERAMIC OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE @ W/ CONCEALED HINGES & MAGNETIC CONCEALED HINGES & MAGNETIC SUPPORT FRAME WALL BEYOND TUBE STEEL SUPPORT CATCH; EDGES @ TILE JOINTS CATCH; EDGES @ TILE JOINTS SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE @ SOAP DISPENSER RESERVOIR SOAP DISPENSER RESERVOIR SUPPORT FRAME WALL BEYOND CONCEALED IN WALL IN WALL CONCEALED

9"

6

EQ

2"

ED GWB. CEILING

2"

8' - 4"

SEAMLESSSEAMLESS 3/4" THK. SOLID 3/4" THK. SURFACE SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP COUNTERTOP OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD

PROJECTED BAG TRASH CHUTE TRASH CHUTE SHELF

A6-4101

SURFACE SOLID VANITY SURFACE BELOW VANITY BELOW

11 3/4"

PLA

SCALE: 3" =

A6-4101

11 SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE AND GROUT SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE AND GROUT

DULED SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE CERAMIC TILE S & KICKERS SECURE OVE ABOVE TURE NT AND SEALANT BACKER ANDROD BACKER ROD AUST CURE CIA STAINLESS CONT. STAINLESS STL TRIM TO STL TRIM TO ALED OVEFASTENER EAL CONCEAL FASTENER K FROSTED 3/8" THK ACRYLIC FROSTED ACRYLIC LENS

EQ

3 3/4" 11 3/4"

2' - 10"

5"

5"

TALL MTL.CONT. ANGLE MTL. ANGLE NING LOW

3 3/4"

TYP

ALIGN

6"

EALED, CONCEALED, COUNTERSUNK COUNTERSUNKCO-CL1 NERFASTENER

12

8

3/4"STEEL THK. SOLID SURFACE TUBE STEEL SUPPORT FOR TUBE SUPPORT FOR OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD BAG SHELF COUNTERTOP, AS REQUIRED. ANCHOR ANCHOR CO-SS1 COUNTERTOP, AS REQUIRED. WALL TO POST IN WALL 8' -TO 0" POST IN DROP-IN SINK AS SCHEDULED 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE OVER 3/4" DROP-IN SINK AS SCHEDULED DROP-IN SINK AS SCHEDULED PLYWOOD BAG SHELF SEAMLESS SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP OVER TUBE STEEL POST TUBE POST 3/4"STEEL PLYWOOD DROP-IN SINKCONCEALED AS CONCEALED INSCHEDULED WALL BEYOND IN WALL BEYOND CO-CL1 SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP OVER SEAMLESS WALL-MOUNTED RECEPTACLE BEYOND BEYOND WALL-MOUNTED RECEPTACLE 3/4" PLYWOOD 2x2x1/4" ALUM. ANGLE

6"

GHT MTL. 3-5/8" STUDMTL. STUD CLG.

2

CO-TA-3

ALIGN

DULED SCHEDULED PARTITIONPARTITION

DETAIL - VENTILATION GRATE @ RESTROOM 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE SEAMLESSSEAMLESS 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE SHELF OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD BAG SHELFBAG OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD

CO-PF-4

A6-4101

SCHED TIL SCALE:

DETAIL - VENTILATION GRATE @ RESTROOM

SEAMLESSSEAMLESS 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE 3/4" THK. SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD COUNTERTOP OVER 3/4" PLYWOOD

8' - 0"

4

EQ

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

10

SSED GHT LED FIXTURES LIGHT TBD FIXTURES TBD HEAD

EQ

5"

EQ

EQ

SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

CO-CL1

EQ

SC

DETAIL - RESTROOM - RESTROOM FULL-HEIGHT FULL-HEIGHT MIRROR MIRROR 3 DETAIL

11

11

CO-GL3

SCHEDULED FAUCET; ENSURE SCHEDULED FAUCET; ENSURE LOCATION LOCATION OF FAUCETOF & SINK MEET FAUCET & SINK MEET MANUF. SPEC. & INSTALL DTLS. MANUF. SPEC. & INSTALL DTLS.

8' - 4"

501 WES NEW YO

MUDSET MUDSET

A6-4101

2' - 3" REQ'D

ALIGN

DETAIL - STRIP LIGHT @ CEILING

8' - 4"

RAISED CONCRETE RAISED CONCRETE SLAB SLAB SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL TILE FINISH EXTENDED TO TOP OF COVE SCHEDULED SCHEDULED FLOOR TILEFLOOR TILE

HUDS TOWE

= 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3"SCALE:

DETAIL - STRIP LIGHT @ CEILING

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

EQ

3

CONT. WATERPROOFING CONT. WATERPROOFING SCHEDULED PARTITION SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL TILEUP FINISH MEMBRANE. MEMBRANE. EXTEND UP EXTEND WALL WALL EXTENDED TO TOP OF COVE MIN. 12" A.F.F. MIN. 12" A.F.F.

9

5"

ALIGN

10

USHYLIC ANEL

6"

6"

1-5/8" FRAMING W/ GYP. BOARD ENCLOSURE

SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL TILE DETAIL - SUBWAY - SUBWAY TILE @TILE GWB @CEILING GWB CEILING 2 DETAIL

10

CO-CL1

1-5/8" FRAMING W/ GYP. GWB. CEILING AS SCHEDULED BOARD ENCLOSURE

SCHEDULED GWB. CEILING AND SUSPENSION

PAINTED WHITE 1/8" S.S. TRIM 1/8"AT S.S. BOTTOM, TRIM ATBUTTBOTTOM, BUTTJOINT BETWEEN JOINT PANELS BETWEEN PANELS 5/8" GYP. BOARDSCHEDULED OVER MTL.SCHEDULED STUDS CERAMIC BASE CERAMIC SEALANT AND BACKER ROD TILE BASE TILE PAINTED WHITE CONT. CLOSED CONT.CELL CLOSED CELL SCHEDULED PARTITION NEOPRENE JOINT BACKER JOINT BACKER SEALANT AND BACKER RODNEOPRENE

2 3/4" GWB. CEILING AS SCHEDULED

SEALANT AND BACKER ROD SUSPENDED GWB. CEILING AS SCHEDULED CONT. STAINLESS STL TRIM TO CONCEAL FASTENER SEALANT AND BACKER ROD TRIM AND LENS AT SIDE WALL CONT. STAINLESS STL TRIM TO BEYOND CONCEAL FASTENER 3/8" THK FROSTED ACRYLIC TRIM AND LENS LENS AT SIDE WALL BEYOND = 1'-0" 3" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3"SCALE: 3/8" THK FROSTED ACRYLIC LENS

ALIGN

ALIGN

2 3/4" SEALANT AND SEALANT BACKER ANDROD BACKER ROD

SUSPENDED GWB. CEILING AS SCHEDULED

2

BLOCKING BLOCKING AS REQ'D. AS REQ'D. EXHAUST GRILLE GLAZING SEALANT GLAZING SEALANT 5/8" GYP. BOARD OVER MTL. STUDS

EXHAUST DUCT

ALUMINUM ANGLE BRACKET SCHEDULED FLUSH SCHEDULED SCHEDULED CERAMIC WALL CERAMIC TILE WALLMOUNTED TILE ALONGFIXTURE LENGTH OF FIXTURE FLUORESCENT LIGHT

ET

EXHAUST GRILLE

EXHAUST DUCT

2' - 10"

RAMIC DULEDBASE CERAMIC TILE BASE TILE LED LIGHT FIXTURES TBD MTL. STUD FRAMING @ BOX OUT CONCEALED, COUNTERSUNK CELL . CLOSED CELL FASTENER RENE T BACKER JOINT BACKER LED LIGHT FIXTURES TBD CONT. MTL. ANGLE ROOFING . WATERPROOFING CONCEALED, COUNTERSUNK RANE. ENDFASTENER UPEXTEND WALL UP WALL 2" A.F.F. CONT. MTL. ANGLE ETE D CONCRETE SLAB SLAB

8"

RAMIC DULEDTILE CERAMIC TILE MTL. STUD FRAMING BOX OUT LIGHT COVE GROUT NT GWB. JOINT @ BOX OUT

14

SCHEDULED SCHEDULED CERAMIC TILE CERAMIC @CO-GL3TILE @ SUPPORT FRAME SUPPORT WALL FRAME BEYOND WALL BEYOND

A6-4101

STAINLESSSTAINLESS STEEL CORNER STEELPROFILE CORNER PROFILE

Descrip

BATHROOM PeRsPeCTiVe 1 July 18, 2012

30

RESTROOM PERSPECTIVES coordinating design concepts with material samples.

BATHROOM PeRsPeCTiVe 3

uly 18, 2012

32

144

ATRIUM RENDERINGS studying flooring options and spandrel material combinations.

145

EISENMAN ARCHITECTS

WINTER 2011 ARCH. INTERNSHIP

New York, NY

Peter Eisenman was among ten architects chosen to submit a design for an “urban folly” to be built for the 2011 Gwangju Design Biennale.

The ten follies are intended to act as catalysts for urban regeneration by serving as investigative interventions between public function and the existing urban fabric, ultimately seeking public reaction to stimulate communications that allow citizens to become actively involved in this regeneration.

Our unique site spans the crosswalk between two entrances to an underground mall and marks the historical north gate of the old city wall, representing a significant crossing of pedestrian activity. Recalling this former city gate, the project takes on a contemporary perspective of this historical feature: a play between plastic form and grid, the folly is a figurative gate composed of a conceptual 100 k’an – signifying a rejection of the imperial law which held that only the emperor was allowed to construct a building of this size – thus celebrating Gwangju as the center of the democratization movement in South Korea.

My role during my time at Eisenman Architects included developing conceptual and schematic design and presentation for the Gwangju Design Biennale project. Additionally, I had the opportunity to explore programming schemes for one of the future buildings of the City of Culture of Galicia in Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

146

147

PHYSICAL MODEL iterations exploring the relationship of grid to site and figure to grid

148

1

4

2

5

3

6

CONCEPT DESIGN sequencing the formation of a modular grid of 100 k’an, from which a figural element emerges into and out of the earth.

149

SITE CONTEXT showing gateway relative to pedestrian crossing and stair to underground shopping mall

150

EXPERIENCE: Passage through and by the folly engages passers-by directly with its grid and figure; one must negotiate the dynamic spaces and forms created

151

ROOF

0

10

20

30

40

50 m

N

City of Culture Exhibition

Central Cooling Plant

DN

VACIO Open to Below

Information

VACIO Open to Below

Archive Exhibition VACIO Open to Below

VACIO Open to Below

IT

LIM

0 LEVEL

of UC TR NS Y CO BRAR LI of

0

10

20

30

40

50 m

TION

N

Archive Sta

cks - Com

pact Sto

rage

VACIO Open to Below

Toilets Mens Toilets Wom ens

Central Cooling Plant UP

Repro Center

ch & Sch

Digital Studio

General Cataloging

UP

Resear

DN

Mechani cal Space

DN

olars Cen

ter DN

Reference Archivists Order Processing

Reference Archivists

Main Read ing Room

-1 LEVEL

0

10

20

PRESENTATION DRAWINGS for publication of the archive building at the City of Culture of Galicia 152

30

40

50 m

N

ARCHIVE BUILDING reprogramming for use as a center of learning for children 153