Introduction to geotechnical engineering 2nd edition das solutions manual 1

Page 1

Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 2nd Edition Das Solutions Manual

Full download at link:

Solution Manual: https://testbankpack.com/p/solution-manual-forintroduction-to-geotechnical-engineering-2nd-edition-das-sivakugan1305257324-9781305257320/

Chapter 5

Therefore, M, = 2 2727 kg and M,,= 0 2273 kg

When raised to moisture content of 16.0%: M,= 0.16x2.2727 = 0.3636 kg

Therefore, quantity of water that has to be added:

0 3636 -0 2273= 0 1363 kg =0.136 kg

2 From Eq (3
0.10 2 5- M, M,
5.1 a False b. False c. d. e. False True False 5
8),
5 3 Refer to the following table.
Volume, V Weight of wet soil, W Moist unit weight, y a Moisture content, w Dry unit weight, ya" (ft') (lb) (lb/rt") (%) (lb/rt') 1/30 3.88 116.4 12 103.93 1/30 4 09 122 7 14 107 53 1/30 4.23 126.9 16 109.4 1/30 4 28 128.4 18 108 81 1/30 4 24 127 2 20 106.0 1/30 4.19 125.7 22 103.03 r-, W b = y 1 ,w(%) 100 23 © 2016 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

The plot of y vs w is shown. From the graph, the maximum dry unit weight = 109.5 I/ft' and the optimum moisture content= 16%.

The plot ofy%a vs w is shown

5 3 \
5 B 02 t----+---1---+-- +- 1-- 1 {Jl4 thwhowl.h' 10 12 I4 16 18 20 22 Moisture content (%) 5.4 EA (52:% = , 4/-+ G, %=62.4lb/f; G,=2.6. Refer to the following table. ,.....,_ tr 150 \ 140 130 ~ w (%) 5 10 15 20 '%a (lb/re) 143.6 128 8 116 7 106.7 c 120 2 110 100 \ ~ '\ ~ '1 25 98.3 5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%) 24
© 2016 Cengage Leaming All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

5.6 Refer to the following table.

w b y = ,w(%) 100

The plot of y vs w is shown. From the graph, the maximum dry unit weight = 100.8 Ib/ft and the optimum moisture content = 15%.

5 151.3 10 135 0 15 121 8 20 111 0 25 101.9 Volume, V Weight of wet soil, W Moist unit weight, y a Moisture content, w Dry unit weight, ya" (ft") (lb) (1b/If?) (%) (Ib/ft?) 1/30 3.69 110.7 12 98 84 1/30 3 82 114 6 14 100 53 1/30 3.88 116.4 16 100 34 1/30 3 87 116.1 18 98.39 1/30 3.81 114.3 20 95.25 1/30 3 77 113 1 21 93.47 '% \ \ A • 5.5 Ea.65.2
, " -+w G, G,=2 76; %= 62 4 1b/f' 150 d 140 , w (%) (b/re') $ o C .5 12o 110 ~ ~~
5 10 15 20 25 30 Moisturecontent (%)
r=-'
.. =
The plot of Yzav vs w is shown
tj}pig 100.8 1b/? 12 14 16 18 20 22 23 Moisture content (%) 25 © 2016 Cengage Leaming All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

5.7 For w = 5.0%, mass ofthe moist specimen= 1850 g and the volume is 1000 ml.

Therefore, moist unit weight, _ I850,9 81 =18 15 kN/m° 1000

nm Ea. @.12 Dry nit weight a-, ',},-11.2av#a

From Eq. (3.20): Void ratio, % 2.68x9.8l 0.521

From Eq (3 21): Degree of saturat.on, S

Repeating these steps for all six moisture contents, the following table can be developed

a From the figure,

i = 5% ,.._
17.28
0.05x2.68
0 257 0 521
=
or 25 7%
Moisture content Specimen mass Moist unit weight Dry unit weight Void ratio, e Degree of saturation, S (%) (g) (kNIm") (kNIm"?) 5 1850 18 15 17 28 0.521 0.257 7 1970 19.33 18.06 0 456 0.412 9 5 2090 20 50 18 72 0.404 0.530 11.8 2110 20.70 18.51 0 420 0 753 14.1 2090 20 50 17 97 0.463 0.816 17 2060 20.21 17.27 0.522 0 873
19 0
18 8
maximum dry 18 6E t 18 4 z unit weight = -18 2 18.75 kN/° ...., 180 0 3 17 8 ±4 c 2 > 17.6 0 17.4 17 2 17 0 0 5 10 Moisture content(%) 15 20 26 0 2016 Cengage Leaming All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part
the optimum
moisture content = 10.0%; and

b. The variation ofvoid ratio and degree of saturation against the moisture content is shown in the following figure

c. From the figure in Problem 5.7b, at optimum moisture content, void ratio= 0.40

Degree of saturation= 0 66 or 66%

5 8 Eq (5 7): D = [ Yd(field) -yd(min) ][ Yd(max) ] ' las9) 7la(mnts)

D, 0.64, so

0.64 = [ Yd(field) - 97 ][ 116.5 ]; Yd(field) = 108.6 1b/f? 116.5- 97 yd(field)

From Eq (5 6): R(%)= 7a«ta) ,100 a(max) 1016 8 6 5,00 =93.2%

1 0 0 9 0 8 0) 0.7 0 c •
'ei
1 0 t 0 9 0 8 E f 0 7 c • t :;::;0 6 . • .. z 0 6 s r cU d l cU b0 0 5 0 5 u a 0 3 0.4 0 4 q ± _ -? Q ... c 00 0 o > • 0 3 0 3 o 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0.0 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 Moisture content (%)
27
02016 Cengage Leaming All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

5.9 In the field, sand used to fill the cone = 16.733 - 10.538= 6.195 lb

Sand used to fill the hole = 6 195 - 1.202 = 4 993 lb

5 10 From Figure 5 23, the optimum moisture content= 16 0% and maximum dry density = 17 15 kN/m' Specifications require that:

a. 16.0% < wme1 < 19.0%, and

b Ye1) > 0 95 17 15 (=16 30) kN/m

Thus, the control test measurements must fall within the shaded zone in the figure to meet the specifications

1 + z c 0
Volume
Moist
0.05096 Y 130 08 _ 118.04 1/f' = w(%) 1+-100 10.2 -100
ofthe hole == 4.993 = 0.05096 ft3 97 97
density of compacted soil= 6 · 629 = 130 08 1b/f
18 0 17 5 0) • EJ\ 17 0 \ \ \ 29 16.5 \ $ \ ±° \ c \ > o ' 160 15 5 15.0 - - - Zero air void curve e Compaction test data Control tests 5 10 15 Moisture content (%) 20 25 28 0 2016 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

Control Test 1: Lies to the left of the shaded zone. Dry unit weight is adequate, however, the moisture content is too low (i.e. too dry). Does not meet the specifications.

Control Test 2: Falls within the shaded zone and meets the specifications.

Control Test 3: The dry unit weight is adequate (in fact, well in excess ofthe required minimum value of 16.3 kN/m), but the water content is slightly high and falls outside the range. This does not meet the specifications. Another problem is that the control test point lies to the right ofthe zero air void curve, which is not possible theoretically Either the control test measurement is incorrect or the assumed G, value is incorrect This has to be checked A larger G, value would shift the zero air void curve upwards.

Control Test 4: Lies within the shaded zone and, hence, meets the specifications.

5 11 From Figure 5 24, the optimum moisture content= 10 0% and the maximum dry unit weight= 18.5 kN/m. Specifications require that:

a. 8 5% < we1< 11 5%

b Yaei)> 17 6 kN/m? (i e 0 95x 18 5 kN/m')

While the dry unit weight ofthe compacted soil meets the specification, the moisture content lies outside the specified range (i e the soil is too wet) It does meet the specification.

From
Moisture content, wk, _ 2083-184 132 9% 1845 Dry unit weight in the field, /ea 1845 x 1015 3 9 81=17 8 kN/m
the field density test:
29 © 2016 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part
30 02016 Cengage Learning All Rights Reserved May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.