Vision 202: 2016 CES 5

Page 1

Welcome

Community Engagement Session #5

~ Key Findings & Recommendations

Please introduce yourself to others at your table

Put on a name tag

Complete the information on the sign-in sheet

1
~

Agenda

Presentation: Key Findings & Recommendations

Small Group Work Activity / Reporting

Next Steps

2
Questions/Comments • Fill out “I Have a Question/Comment” form • Call: 630.493.8000 • Email: vision202@lisle202.org • Ask questions during Small Group time 3

Sign In Sheet

4

Gather input from the Lisle 202 community to determine community priorities for Lisle 202 facilities

Use community feedback to inform the School Board in the development of a Facilities Master Plan

Board Charge for Vision 202: Chapter 2

Facilitating Team

Team Roster

Community Chairs Susan Stears Bill Buchelt

Community Members

Terry Brennan

Dan Helderle

Mark Kelly

Steve Pawlowicz

Monica Wagoner

District Representatives Keith Filipiak, Superintendent

Pat Kerback, LEA President & Teacher

Linda Kotalik, Assistant Superintendent

David Wilkinson, Director of Finance

Jenna Engler, Communications

School Board Members Pam Ahlmann Amy Narot

Perkins+Will Architects Mark Jolicoeur Rick Young

6

Session Attendance

Nearly 180 stakeholders attended at least one session

Average session attendance was 80 stakeholders

7

Facility Master Plan

8 Board Deliberation Physical Assessment Educational Assessment Finances
2015

Community Engagement Sessions

CES #1

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

9

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

• A Physical Assessment identifies

• Physical assets that need to be repaired or replaced • Budget Estimates for Building Maintenance and upkeep

A Physical Assessment of each facility was completed in June 2015

CES #1 10

Cracking Parking Lot

Facility Challenges

Aged Mechanical Systems

Roof Repairs

11
Facility Physical Tate Woods $1.7M Schiesher $3.2M Junior HS $3.0M Senior HS $2.5M Wilde Field/ Maint. Bldg. $1.8M Subtotal $12.2M Estimated Maintenance Costs CES #1 12
Physical Assessment of District Facilities

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

Considering each facility, Vision 202 participants identified Positive Features and Desired Changes for Lisle 202 facilities in the areas of:

Site Grounds

• Other CES #1 Group Activity 13
Building Interior
Safety/Security
Building Exterior
Parking/Lighting

Community Engagement Sessions

CES #1

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

CES #2

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

14

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

• An Educational Assessment identifies how well our facilities meet the educational needs of the District for today and tomorrow

An Educational Assessment of each facility was completed in June-December 2015

CES #2 15

EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT

Observation Categories

Building Security

Early Childhood ABC

Functional Sizing

Educational Assessment

Observation Categories

Special Services

Instructional Technology

Science & Other Labs

Small & Large Group

16
CES #2

Facility Educational Challenges

Classroom Sizing Functional Sizing Student Services Space Storage Secure Entry Technology Infrastructure 17

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

Vision 202 participants identified educational aspects related to the Lisle 202 facilities to be considered in the Facilities Master Plan based on:

• Trends in Education

• Educational Assessment

• Facilities Possibilities

CES #2 Group Activity 18

Building Tours – February 2016

Tate Woods Elementary School Schiesher Elementary School Lisle Junior High School
CES #2 19
Lisle High School

Community Engagement Sessions

CES #1

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

CES #2

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

CES #3

Review & Evaluate Facility Options

20

Facility Master Plan Initial Options

• Eight (8) Facility Options were presented for initial consideration in the Facilities Master Plan

• Vision 202 participants were asked to consider the factors:

1. Relationships

2. Communication

3. Consistent Expectations

4. School Climate

5. Instruction

6. Transportation

…as they provided feedback and selected top facility options

7. Finances

8. Safety

9. Other

CES #3
Group Activity 21

Long Term Facility Plan Considerations

1. Number of Elementary Schools

2. Location CES-3

CES #3 22

Facility Master Plan Initial Options

Of the Eight (8) Initial Facility Options, three options were selected as the most desirable by

202 participants:

• Option C • PK-2 @ Meadows • 3-5 @ Schiesher
Option F • PK-5 @ Schiesher • Option G • PK-5 @ Meadows CES #3 Group Activity 23
Vision

Community Engagement Sessions

CES #1

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

CES #2

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

CES #3

Review & Evaluate Facility Options

CES #4

Financial Implications of Facility Options

24

Financial Implications

Funding Sources: Regular Annual Budget for the Next Ten Years

Total Investment Physical Needs Investment $2.5 million $3.0 million $1.8 million $7.3 million Educational Needs Investment $1.4 million $1.5 million n/a $3.0 million Total Investment per Facility $4.0 million $4.5 million $1.8 million $10.3 million
CES #4 25
High
School Jr. High School Wilde Field

Long Term Facility Plan Considerations

3. Construction Logistics

4. Cost

CES #4 26
CES-4

OPTION

– G NEW PK-5 SCHOOL @ MEADOWS SITE

OPTION – G: New PK-5 Building @ Meadows Site

OPTION – G: New PK-5 Building @ Meadows Site Timeline SITE 2018 2019 2020 2021 SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER NEW PK-5 BUILDING & SITE

OPTION – F NEW PK-5

SCHOOL @ SCHIESHER SITE

OPTION – F: New PK-5 Building @ Schiesher Site

OPTION – F: New PK-5 Building @ Schiesher Site Timeline PORT. 2018 2019 2020 2021 SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER POSSIBLY NO GYMNASIUM EAST WING & SHARED RESOURCES PKNG. WEST WING & PARTIAL SHARED RES. BLDG. Playground
SITE
Playground

OPTION – C

NEW PK-2 SCHOOL @ MEADOWS SITE

NEW 3-5 SCHOOL @ SCHIESHER SITE

– C:
– C:
OPTION
New PK-2 Building @ Meadows Site OPTION
New 3-5 Building @ Schiesher Site
– C: New 3-5 Building @ Schiesher Site Timeline 35 SITE PORT. 2018 2019 2020 2021 SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER PORTABLE CLASSROOMS EAST WING PORT. WEST WING PORT. BLDG.
– C: New PK-2 Building @ Meadows Site Timeline SITE 2018 2019 2020 2021 SUMMER SUMMER SUMMER NEW PK-2 BUILDING & SITE
OPTION
OPTION

Financial Implications

* Inclusive of demolition, building construction, site construction, storm water detention, and site restoration.

** Inclusive of contingencies, professional service fees, testing, furniture, and technology. (Typically 20-25% of Project Budget)

SUMMARY Direct * Construction Budget + Indirect ** Construction Budget = Total Project Budget OPTION G New PK-5 @ Meadows $ 30,300,000 $ 8,200,000 $ 38,500,000 OPTION F New PK-5 @ Schiesher $ 31,900,000 $ 8,600,000 $ 40,500,000 OPTION C New PK-2 @ Meadows New 3-5 @ Schiesher $ 36,500,000 $ 10,100,000 $ 46,600,000
CES #4 36

Financial Implications

Facility Option Total Cost G New PK-5 @ Meadows $39 mil F New PK-5 @ Schiesher $41 mil C New PK-2 @ Meadows New 3-5 @ Schiesher $47 mil Funding Sources: Fund Balances + New Bonds = $42 million Sufficient District Funding Sources Option C would require a Referendum. Cost to taxpayer= $100/year per $300K Household for 15 years CES #4 37
Second Choice • Option F One School • New PK-5 @ Schiesher Site Third Choice • Option C Two Schools • New PK-2 @ Meadows Site & New 3-5 @ Schiesher Site First Choice • Option G One School • New PK-5 @ Meadows Site CES #4 GroupActivity 38
Facility Option Priorities

Community Engagement Sessions

CES #1

Physical Assessment of District Facilities

CES #2

Educational Assessment of District Facilities

CES #3

Review & Evaluate Facility Options

CES #4

Financial Implications of Facility Options

CES #5

Key Findings & Recommendations

39

Did we hear you correctly? What did we learn?

Review of Key Findings & Recommendations

40

Desired Facility Characteristics

Vision 202 participants identified aspects of the physical and educational environments for the options to be considered for the Facilities Master Plan

1.1 Flexibility

1.5 Work Spaces

1.2 Technology Ready

1.3 Security

1.4 Collaboration

1.6 Transitions Between Buildings

1.7 Learning Environments

CES #5 Group Activity 41

Key Facility Considerations

Vision 202 participants identified overall preferences to be considered in the development of the Facilities Master Plan

2.1 First Choice – Option G

2.2 Second Choice – Option F

2.3 Third Choice – Option C

2.4 Elementary Grade Configuration

2.5 School Location

2.6 Financial Considerations

2.7 Drop-off/Pick-up Logistics

2.8 Advantages & Disadvantages of Facility Options

CES #5 Group Activity 42

Small Group Work Activity

43

Small Group Activity

Task #1 Review of Key Findings & Recommendations

44

Task #1

Small Group Activity

- Review of Key Findings & Recommendations

45

Small Group Reporting

46

Next Steps…

The Board of Education will…

Review the data collected during the master planning process

Explore detailed data included in the plan

Gather further necessary data

Determine a course of action for the Facilities Master Plan (July-December 2016)

47
Stay Connected Future Communications vision202.org lisle202.org eNewsletter bit.ly/lislevision202enewsletter Like Us on Facebook Search Lisle Vision 202 email Follow Us on Twitter @Vision_202 48

Facilitating Team

Bill Buchelt - Co-chair

Susan Stears - Co-chair

Terry Brennan

Dan Helderle

Mark Kelly

Steve Pawlowicz

Monica Wagoner

Keith Filipiak

Pat Kerback

Linda Kotalik

Dave Wilkinson

Pam Ahlmann

Amy Narot

Jenna Engler

Vision 202 Participants

Ken Ahlmann

Liz Aureus-Collins

Lorie Barber

Lisa Barrette

John Barrette

Carolyn Bartelli

Diana Bieniasz

Valerie Bixler

Rob Bixler

Anne Blaeske

Birdie Boehmer

Monica Bosco

Emmy Bossenga

Kahty Brock

Sue Buchelt

Neil Buchelt

Herb Buchholz

Marilyn Buchholz

Mary Bumpus

Paul Burdett

Yomarie Burgos

Karen Burris

Sharon Byrne

Jim Campian

Linda Capristo

Elaine Catuara

Pat Cawiezel

Karen Cerveny

Gregg Chalecki

Lauren Clavelli

Don Cook

Betty Cornfield

Tim Corrigan

Tonia Cyrus

Thank you!

Celeste McIntyre

Marshall McKay

Alex Pellicano

Marybeth Peterson

Pristen Pettit

Sadhana Phreykz

Jim Springer

Patti Staley

Brian Stankos

Kristin Steele

Carl Doerr

Kate Doyle

Eileen Duban

David Dybeck

Mary Ebert

Jerry Ebert

Tor Erickson

Debra Ericson

Lee Ernst

David Farrell

Wendi Ferron

Scott Frigo

Carol Frueh

Rosemary Gallaway

Paula Garcia

Dan Garvy

Cathy Geers

Jaspreet Gill

Karen Gordon

Garrett Gosselink

Wesley Gosselink

Trish Green

Heidi Haen

Amanda Hahn

Jeff Howard

Sara Hritz

Daniel Hritz

Patty Hurt

David Kearney

Natalie Keigher

Mallory Kelly

Mary Kilroy

Greg Kutkoski

Katie Lapham

Steve Laue

Denise Leach

Courtney Liles

Beth Lind

Mike Loftus

Mike Lyon

Julie Lyon

Jennifer Marcucci

Jillian Marino

Lisa Martich

Kim Martin

Yousef Matariyeh

Eunice McConville

Jane McGrath

Stacey Melbye

Mark Melka

Pete Meyer

Lauren Miller

Anna Miller

Michelle Molina

Mary Moses

Suzanne Murray

Wendy Nadeau

Lisa Nicholas

Sandy Nicholson

Michele Nitzki

John Nitzki

Mark Oliphant

Laura Olson

Natalie Oros

Laura Paley

Gigi Palicka

Dan Palicka

Elizabeth Parker

Anthony Pascente

Laui Pascente

Ashok Patel

Kristine Paulson

Solange Pilizota

Jen Pomatto

Michelle Probst

Lauren Puetz

Jim Puzon

Adam Rieck

Tamara Rotelli

Jack Royhl

Kevin Russell

David Sally

Pat Sarb

Carol Schmidke

Dan Schraub

Rachel Schuette

Andrew Sergeant

Christy Sharafinski

Meg Sima

Glyn Skerrett

Sandi Skonieczny

Vince Slowiak

Jason Smid

Elise Smith

Ray Sojka

Julie Springer

Tim Steele

Colleen Stefani

Patricia Stevens

Angie Sullivan

Jamie Sullivan

Scott Sullivan

Lynn Sweitzer

Bob Tarasewicz

Maureen Toby

Suzanne Trotter

Paul Trotter

Irene Tu

Julie Uster

Scott Wagoner

Judy Walsh

Mike Walsh

Lori Whitnell

Cathy Yaniz

Stuart Young

Sue Zikuda

Barb Zomick

Andrew Zomick

49

Presentation to the School Board KEY INDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

School Board Meeting This Summer

50

Thank You!

51

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.