Vision 202: 2016 CES 5

Welcome Community Engagement Session #5 ~ Key Findings & Recommendations~

• Please introduce yourself to others at your table • Put on a name tag • Complete the information on the sign-in sheet 1

Agenda • Presentation: Key Findings & Recommendations • Small Group Work Activity / Reporting • Next Steps

2

Questions/Comments • Fill out “I Have a Question/Comment” form • Call: 630.493.8000 • Email: vision202@lisle202.org • Ask questions during Small Group time

3

Sign-In Sheet

4

• Gather input from the Lisle 202 community to determine community priorities for Lisle 202 facilities • Use community feedback to inform the School Board in the development of a Facilities Master Plan

Board Charge for Vision 202: Chapter 2 perkinswill.com

5

Facilitating Team Team Roster Community Chairs

Susan Stears

Bill Buchelt

Community Members

Terry Brennan Dan Helderle Mark Kelly

Steve Pawlowicz Monica Wagoner

District Representatives

Keith Filipiak, Superintendent Pat Kerback, LEA President & Teacher Linda Kotalik, Assistant Superintendent David Wilkinson, Director of Finance Jenna Engler, Communications

School Board Members

Pam Ahlmann

Amy Narot

Perkins+Will Architects

Mark Jolicoeur

Rick Young 6

Session Attendance

• Nearly 180 stakeholders attended at least one session • Average session attendance was 80 stakeholders 7

Facility Master Plan Physical Assessment

Educational Assessment

Finances 2015

Board Deliberation 8

Community Engagement Sessions CES #1 Physical Assessment of District Facilities

9

Physical Assessment of District Facilities • A Physical Assessment identifies • Physical assets that need to be repaired or replaced • Budget Estimates for Building Maintenance and upkeep

• A Physical Assessment of each facility was completed in June 2015

CES #1

10

Facility Challenges Cracking Parking Lot

Aged Mechanical Systems

Roof Repairs

CES #1 11

Physical Assessment of District Facilities Estimated Maintenance Costs

CES #1

Facility

Physical

Tate Woods

$1.7M

Schiesher

$3.2M

Junior HS

$3.0M

Senior HS

$2.5M

Wilde Field/ Maint. Bldg.

$1.8M

Subtotal

$12.2M 12

Physical Assessment of District Facilities Considering each facility, Vision 202 participants identified Positive Features and Desired Changes for Lisle 202 facilities in the areas of: • Building Interior

• Safety/Security

• Building Exterior

• Parking/Lighting

• Site Grounds

• Other Group Activity

CES #1

13

Community Engagement Sessions CES #1 Physical Assessment of District Facilities CES #2 Educational Assessment of District Facilities

14

Educational Assessment of District Facilities • An Educational Assessment identifies how well our facilities meet the educational needs of the District for today and tomorrow • An Educational Assessment of each facility was completed in June-December 2015

CES #2

15

EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT Observation Categories

ABC

Early Childhood

Building Security Special Services Functional Sizing

Educational Assessment Observation Categories

Small & Large Group Instructional Technology Science & Other Labs

CES #2

16

Facility Educational Challenges

Storage Classroom Sizing

Functional Sizing

Secure Entry

Student Services Space

Technology Infrastructure 17

Educational Assessment of District Facilities Vision 202 participants identified educational aspects related to the Lisle 202 facilities to be considered in the Facilities Master Plan based on: • Trends in Education • Educational Assessment • Facilities Possibilities

Group Activity CES #2

18

Building Tours – February 2016

Tate Woods Elementary School

CES #2

Schiesher Elementary School

Lisle Junior High School

Lisle High School

19

Community Engagement Sessions CES #1 Physical Assessment of District Facilities CES #2 Educational Assessment of District Facilities CES #3 Review & Evaluate Facility Options

20

Facility Master Plan Initial Options • Eight (8) Facility Options were presented for initial consideration in the Facilities Master Plan • Vision 202 participants were asked to consider the factors: 1. Relationships 2. Communication 3. Consistent Expectations

4. School Climate 5. Instruction 6. Transportation

7. Finances 8. Safety 9. Other

…as they provided feedback and selected top facility options CES #3

21 Group Activity

Long-Term Facility Plan Considerations CES-3

CES #3

1. Number of Elementary Schools 2. Location

22

Facility Master Plan Initial Options Of the Eight (8) Initial Facility Options, three options were selected as the most desirable by Vision 202 participants: • Option C

• PK-2 @ Meadows • 3-5 @ Schiesher

• Option F • PK-5 @ Schiesher

• Option G CES #3

• PK-5 @ Meadows

Group Activity 23

Community Engagement Sessions CES #1 Physical Assessment of District Facilities CES #2 Educational Assessment of District Facilities CES #3 Review & Evaluate Facility Options

CES #4 Financial Implications of Facility Options

24

Financial Implications High School

Jr. High School

Wilde Field

High School

Junior High

Wilde Field

Total Investment

Physical Needs Investment

$2.5 million

$3.0 million

$1.8 million

$7.3 million

Educational Needs Investment

$1.4 million

$1.5 million

n/a

$3.0 million

Total Investment per Facility

$4.0 million

$4.5 million

$1.8 million

$10.3 million

Funding Sources: Regular Annual Budget for the Next Ten Years CES #4

25

Long-Term Facility Plan Considerations CES-3

CES-4

CES #4

1. Number of Elementary Schools 2. Location

3. Construction Logistics 4. Cost 26

OPTION – G

NEW PK-5 SCHOOL @ MEADOWS SITE

OPTION – G: New PK-5 Building @ Meadows Site

perkinswill.com

28

OPTION – G: New PK-5 Building @ Meadows Site Timeline

NEW PK-5 BUILDING & SITE SITE 2018

SUMMER

2019

SUMMER

2020

2021

SUMMER

perkinswill.com

29

OPTION – F

NEW PK-5 SCHOOL @ SCHIESHER SITE

OPTION – F: New PK-5 Building @ Schiesher Site

perkinswill.com

31

OPTION – F: New PK-5 Building @ Schiesher Site Timeline

POSSIBLY NO GYMNASIUM WEST WING & PARTIAL SHARED PORT.RES. SITE 2018

EAST WING & SHARED RESOURCES BLDG.

SUMMER

2019

SUMMER

PKNG. 2020

Playground

2021

SUMMER

Playground

perkinswill.com

32

OPTION – C

NEW PK-2 SCHOOL @ MEADOWS SITE NEW 3-5 SCHOOL @ SCHIESHER SITE

OPTION – C: New PK-2 Building @ Meadows Site

OPTION – C: New 3-5 Building @ Schiesher Site

perkinswill.com

34

perkinswill.com

34

OPTION – C: New PK-2 Building @ Meadows Site Timeline

NEW PK-2 BUILDING & SITE SITE 2018

SUMMER

2019

2020

SUMMER

2021

SUMMER

OPTION – C: New 3-5 Building @ Schiesher Site Timeline PORTABLE CLASSROOMS WEST WING

PORT.

SITE 2018

PORT. EAST WING BLDG.

SUMMER

2019

SUMMER

PORT. 2020

2021

SUMMER

perkinswill.com

35

35

Financial Implications SUMMARY

Direct * Construction Budget

+

Indirect ** Construction Budget

=

Total Project Budget

OPTION G

$ 30,300,000

$ 8,200,000

$ 38,500,000

OPTION F

$ 31,900,000

$ 8,600,000

$ 40,500,000

OPTION C

$ 36,500,000

$ 10,100,000

$ 46,600,000

New PK-5 @ Meadows New PK-5 @ Schiesher New PK-2 @ Meadows New 3-5 @ Schiesher

*

Inclusive of demolition, building construction, site construction, storm water detention, and site restoration.

**

Inclusive of contingencies, professional service fees, testing, furniture, and technology. (Typically 20-25% of Project Budget)

CES #4

36

Financial Implications Facility Option

Total Cost

G

$39 mil

New PK-5 @ Meadows

F

$41 mil

C

$47 mil

New PK-5 @ Schiesher

New PK-2 @ Meadows New 3-5 @ Schiesher

Sufficient District Funding Sources

Option C would require a Referendum.

Cost to taxpayer= $100/year per $300K Household for 15 years

Funding Sources: Fund Balances + New Bonds = $42 million CES #4

37

Facility Option Priorities First Choice • Option G

One School • New PK-5 @ Meadows Site

Second Choice • Option F One School • New PK-5 @ Schiesher Site

Third Choice • Option C

Two Schools • New PK-2 @ Meadows Site & New 3-5 @ Schiesher Site CES #4

Group Activity 38

Community Engagement Sessions CES #1 Physical Assessment of District Facilities CES #2 Educational Assessment of District Facilities CES #3 Review & Evaluate Facility Options

CES #4 Financial Implications of Facility Options CES #5 Key Findings & Recommendations 39

Did we hear you correctly? What did we learn?

Review of Key Findings & Recommendations 40

Desired Facility Characteristics Vision 202 participants identified aspects of the physical and educational environments for the options to be considered for the Facilities Master Plan 1.1 Flexibility

1.5 Work Spaces

1.2 Technology Ready

1.6 Transitions Between Buildings

1.3 Security

1.7 Learning Environments

1.4 Collaboration CES #5

Group Activity 41

Key Facility Considerations Vision 202 participants identified overall preferences to be considered in the development of the Facilities Master Plan 2.1 First Choice – Option G

2.5 School Location

2.2 Second Choice – Option F

2.6 Financial Considerations

2.3 Third Choice – Option C

2.7 Drop-off/Pick-up Logistics

2.4 Elementary Grade Configuration

2.8 Advantages & Disadvantages of Facility Options

CES #5

42 Group Activity

Small Group Work Activity

43

Small Group Activity Task #1 Review of Key Findings & Recommendations

44

Small Group Activity Task #1 - Review of Key Findings & Recommendations

45

Small Group Reporting

46

Next Steps…

The Board of Education will…

• Review the data collected during the master planning process • Explore detailed data included in the plan • Gather further necessary data • Determine a course of action for the Facilities Master Plan (July-December 2016) 47

Stay Connected Future Communications

vision202.org lisle202.org

email

eNewsletter

bit.ly/lislevision202enewsletter

Like Us on Facebook Search Lisle Vision 202

Follow Us on Twitter @Vision_202 48

Bieniasz Facilitating Team Diana Valerie Bixler Bill Buchelt - Co-chair Susan Stears - Co-chair Terry Brennan Dan Helderle Mark Kelly Steve Pawlowicz Monica Wagoner Keith Filipiak Pat Kerback Linda Kotalik Dave Wilkinson Pam Ahlmann Amy Narot Jenna Engler

Vision 202 Participants

Ken Ahlmann Liz Aureus-Collins Lorie Barber Lisa Barrette John Barrette Carolyn Bartelli

Rob Bixler Anne Blaeske Birdie Boehmer Monica Bosco Emmy Bossenga Kahty Brock Sue Buchelt Neil Buchelt Herb Buchholz Marilyn Buchholz Mary Bumpus Paul Burdett Yomarie Burgos Karen Burris Sharon Byrne Jim Campian Linda Capristo Elaine Catuara Pat Cawiezel Karen Cerveny Gregg Chalecki Lauren Clavelli Don Cook Betty Cornfield Tim Corrigan Tonia Cyrus

Thank you!

Brianne Davis Patrick DeCraene Kathy Dineen-Hendricks Judith Doerr Carl Doerr Kate Doyle Eileen Duban David Dybeck Mary Ebert Jerry Ebert Tor Erickson Debra Ericson Lee Ernst David Farrell Wendi Ferron Scott Frigo Carol Frueh Rosemary Gallaway Paula Garcia Dan Garvy Cathy Geers Jaspreet Gill Karen Gordon Garrett Gosselink Wesley Gosselink Trish Green Heidi Haen Amanda Hahn

Deanna Harris Sharon Helderle Brenda Henry Dan Herndon Jeff Howard Sara Hritz Daniel Hritz Patty Hurt David Kearney Natalie Keigher Mallory Kelly Mary Kilroy Greg Kutkoski Katie Lapham Steve Laue Denise Leach Courtney Liles Beth Lind Mike Loftus Mike Lyon Julie Lyon Jennifer Marcucci Jillian Marino Lisa Martich Kim Martin Yousef Matariyeh Eunice McConville Jane McGrath

Celeste McIntyre Marshall McKay Sean McKay Rob McLear Stacey Melbye Mark Melka Pete Meyer Lauren Miller Anna Miller Michelle Molina Mary Moses Suzanne Murray Wendy Nadeau Lisa Nicholas Sandy Nicholson Michele Nitzki John Nitzki Mark Oliphant Laura Olson Natalie Oros Laura Paley Gigi Palicka Dan Palicka Elizabeth Parker Anthony Pascente Laui Pascente Ashok Patel Kristine Paulson

Alex Pellicano Marybeth Peterson Pristen Pettit Sadhana Phreykz Solange Pilizota Jen Pomatto Michelle Probst Lauren Puetz Jim Puzon Adam Rieck Tamara Rotelli Jack Royhl Kevin Russell David Sally Pat Sarb Carol Schmidke Dan Schraub Rachel Schuette Andrew Sergeant Christy Sharafinski Meg Sima Glyn Skerrett Sandi Skonieczny Vince Slowiak Jason Smid Elise Smith Ray Sojka Julie Springer

Jim Springer Patti Staley Brian Stankos Kristin Steele Tim Steele Colleen Stefani Patricia Stevens Angie Sullivan Jamie Sullivan Scott Sullivan Lynn Sweitzer Bob Tarasewicz Maureen Toby Suzanne Trotter Paul Trotter Irene Tu Julie Uster Scott Wagoner Judy Walsh Mike Walsh Lori Whitnell Cathy Yaniz Stuart Young Sue Zikuda Barb Zomick Andrew Zomick 49

Presentation to the School Board

KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS School Board Meeting

This Summer

50

Thank You!

51