From the Journal of Joshua Fryfogle
Liberty, Liberally Volume II - Issue X
October 2022
Defend Our Constitution! ...From Our Constitution?
I’ve been giving some serious consideration to the question of the Constitutional Convention, since all these ‘Defend Our Constitution’ ads started bombarding me. I’ve done some research into the subject, including the perspectives of the proponents of a Constitutional Convention as well, and I have some thoughts. First and foremost, the Alaska Constitution literally includes the requirement that we consider a Constitutional Convention on the ballot every ten years. So, if the Alaska Constitution is so great, as the Defend Our Constitution ads repetitiously remind us, then what about this part? The part that says we, the people of Alaska, should consider having a Constitutional Convention every ten years? Are they claiming to defend the Alaska Constitution from the Alaska Constitution? We must assume that the Constitution of Alaska provides this as an opportunity to correct against something. What could it be? Why might we need, according to the Alaska Constitution, a convention to affect that document? After all, we have the legislature to do that. Our elected representatives are supposed to re-present the will of the people, right? So why did the framers of the Alaska Constitution, at their own Constitutional Convention, include this caveat that we weigh the merits of another Constitutional Convention every decade? The only rational reason why this ballot question is required by the Alaska Constitution is because the framers knew that legislatures - and state governments - can get off course. The great Alaskans who wrote our Constitution knew that the legislative amendment process might not suffice in the ongoing experiment of a more perfect union. They knew that the people might get fed up with the legislature one day, and they gave us a way to bypass them if needed. They wrote it into the Constitution, so that we can defend against those who would subvert the spirit of the law. If the legislature isn’t getting the job done, then we, the people of Alaska, can step in and get it done. That’s the constitutional function of the Constitutional Convention. We can elect delegates from among our districts and those delegates will be empowered to forward changes that will be voted on by a congress of delegates. However, this presents a problem. The people who are in the legislature, the same bipartisan group of people who are most worried that a Constitutional Convention might undo what they’ve done to get us here, might be elected as a delegate! That is a perfect example of something in the Alaska Constitution that needs to be fixed. The only Alaskans who shouldn’t be eligible to be elected as delegates are those who have been previously elected to the
Liberty, Liberally
Liberty, Liberally
Free Hand
legislature, and those who work for them. If we, the people, choose to have a Constitutional Convention, it is an obvious repudiation of our previous representation. So, if we decide to do this, that’s my first suggestion for change. I agree that the Alaska Constitution is a great document, as Constitutions go. I especially like the part that gives power back to the people every ten years, in case these politicians get us into some situation that doesn’t serve us. That might be my favorite part, considering how those same people have banded together to stop that from happening. It’s not my job to tell you how to vote. It’s your job to figure out how you should vote. That’s the whole point of voting - representative government. But remember, it is outside money that is funding all the Defend Our Constitution ads, and remember that they are claiming to defend the Constitution from a part of the Constitution. Their name, Defend The Constitution, is itself a misleading misnomer. The Constitutional Convention is defended best by the Constitution itself. If you feel that we, the people, need a reset with our representative government, then you should vote Yes for a Constitutional Convention, as the Constitution allows. If you think the state of Alaska is doing great, then you should vote No. I don’t know many people who think that Alaska is doing great, and I know a lot of people of various partisan persuasions. I’m voting yes, if for no other reason, because we almost all agree that the Legislature should be on the road system, near the population center of Alaska. We shouldn’t have to board a plane and possibly submit to a body search by a federal agency just to interact with our own state legislature, and that should be enshrined in our Constitution. But who cares how I’m voting? That’s my conscience, not yours. Whether you vote Yes or No, just remember, it’s your constitutional right, and a constitutional requirement, that you vote your conscience on this one. Forget all the people trying to convince you how to vote. Ask yourself, do you think the legislature is eventually going to get better, or are they only going to make things perpetually worse? What’s the trajectory?
Self Made Man Sculpture by Bobbie Carlyl By Josh Fryfogle Oct 16, 2015 Free my hands And let me chip away The stone that has me captured Inside this mountain Of solidified light A soul needs a fracture Refracting Fingers feeling, cracking I Am the artist and the art Weakness is Hard as stone and rock A quarried block torn apart Light will shine From new stone set free Refracting from its darkness Slowly, so Slowly it is revealed Chipping away at the artist Shards of ego Gravel ground around Pieces of some broken man Parts of me go Falling free Brushed aside by my own hands
www.LibertyLiberally.com
The Alaska Constitution defends you from counterproductive, partisan politics, by giving you the opportunity to make changes as needed every ten years. A Constitutional Convention is our last line of defense against those who have led us here by letting us down. They wouldn’t need a half million in ads if they hadn’t done such a horrible job in the last ten years.
www.LibertyLiberally.com
From the Journal of Joshua Fryfogle