Let's Play Hockey April 2017 issue

Page 1

INSIDE: LPH’s Annual Summer Hockey Guide Pages 15-21

JAILLET WINS MIKE RICHTER AWARD

Volume XLV • Number 27 • Issue 1214

April 20, 2017

www.letsplayhockey.com

University of Denver junior goale Tanner Jaillet backstopped the Pioneers to their eighth NCAA Championship

By David H. Hendrickson USCHO.com

Let’s Play Hockey photo by Mike Thill

CHICAGO — In front of an enthusiastic throng of family, friends and fans packed into Kitty O’Sheas inside the Chicago Hilton, Denver goaltender Tanner Jaillet was announced the winner of the Mike Richter Award on Friday, April 7. The award, given annually to the top Division I netminder, marked the third major award earned by a member of the Pioneers, following coach Jim Montgomery’s selection as the Spencer T. Penrose Coach of the Year and Pioneers’ defenseman Will Butcher’s winning of the Hobey Baker Award. “This guy stands as an exceptional player in my eyes,” Richter said. “Consistency is the mark of a champion and in 27 of the games this guy played, he held the other team to two or less goals. That’s called giving your team a chance to win.” Jaillet certainly did that. He compiled a

Denver’s Tanner Jaillet posted a 28-5-4 record, a 1.82 goals-against average and .929 save percentage in 2016-17.

28-5-4 record and backstopped the Pioneers to the top defensive ranking in the

country, 1.82 goals against per game. Unlike those goaltenders who spent con-

siderable time in youth hockey playing outside the crease, Jaillet was instantly attracted to the position and moved to it exclusively as soon as he could. “I don’t know what it was,” he said. “Maybe it was the gear and the helmets, I don’t know. All I remember is that I wanted to be a goaltender.” He idolized Patrick Roy, especially enjoying the Colorado Avalanche goalie going toeto-toe with New Jersey netminder Martin Brodeur. Jaillet was somewhat of a natural, but though he was very good, he wasn’t selected for every team he desired. There were times teammates moved on to loftier teams and left him behind. Those setbacks fueled his drive to improve. “I always had the love for the game, but if you see your friends that you played with go to the next level and you stay back, it makes you push harder so you can get better and Continued on page 7

Synergy was the winner at the Women’s World Championship By Jack Blatherwick Let’s Play Hockey Columnist

Photo: USA Hockey

It’s a different game – USA versus Canada women’s hockey. Other than the fierce competition, it’s nothing like an NHL playoff game. And why should it be? The rules are different. There’s no body checking, so games are won by skating, passing, creative playmaking and committed defense. Oh, and shooting. The Canadians know that detail well. Not that they have better shots – maybe they do, I don’t know – but they are very good at getting quality shots off, even if they create fewer chances in the game. They are very skillful, and their objective is to get the puck moving toward the net as fast as they can. On the other hand, the Americans’ puck-control style features passing, regrouping and patience to produce better shooting angles.

Combining relentless puck control with creative passing at high speed was the winning formula for Team USA.

If an attack is defended well by the Canadians, the Americans often pass back to the defense, regroup and swing back deep to attack with speed through the neutral

zone. There are hundreds of passes per game – long passes, short ones and some very deceptive. A fan of the men’s game might call some passes “risky,” but the

American coaches answer that question with better execution from practice repetitions. Imagine how they’ll execute after practicing together for six months before the Olympic Games next February. For this tournament, they had only one practice before competition. Is this philosophy more artistic than practical? The men’s game has devolved to a defense-first mentality – even when we have the puck – because the physical nature makes puck control more difficult. Hundreds of passes might lead to turnovers, and the fear of that possibility has led to dump-and-chase hockey. “Get the puck deep. Give it to the other D. Pound on them with an aggressive (physical) forecheck and hope they turn it over.” But in the women’s game, the forecheck Continued on page 6

INSIDE KIM MCCULLOUGH

DA VE SCHWARTZ DAVE

PETE WAGGONER

GIRLS’ & WOMEN’S HOCKEY

So, how did it go?

UND announces plan to cut women’s hockey

Making a difference

Champions crowned at Stick it to Cancer tourney

PAGE 4

PAGE 10

PAGE 23

PAGES 24-25


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.