TRACING THE IMPACT OF WORK PLACEMENTS ON VOCATIONAL LEARNERS: IRELAND NATIONAL REPORT
What Would Learners Change About Their Mobility? Survey respondents frequently mentioned that they would have liked more language instruction before going on placement: • ‘All students should get a few weeks of language classes before going abroad.’ • ‘Would advise if going to a foreign national country to consider languages classes as communication skills are so important.’ • ‘I enjoyed my placement immensely, however I would have liked to be more familiar with the language of the country before I went. But this time was not given to learn.’ Interestingly, what learners from the in-person research group most frequently said they would change was the attitude of their fellow learners. Both focus groups reported difficulties with peers who were challenging to live and work with, who complained excessively or who did not take their work placements seriously. The participants found these attitudes demotivating, and also felt that bad behaviour could diminish the status of vocational learners in the eyes of employers. Participants in both groups argued strongly that a strict selection process should apply. In Focus Group A, Ellen stressed that Erasmus+ opportunities should be offered only to people who would make the best of them: • You can only help someone to strengthen themselves; the person has to keep pushing. So Erasmus+ is a huge foundation for any student who wants to push themselves. We all have different reasons why we wanna go, so if you’re chosen to go why don’t you just use that opportunity? My advice would be to look for those who are really passionate because you can’t waste all that money and time on someone who is not going to bring back nothing. Some people just want to go, dump their bag and fly into the air – it’s not worth it; it should be looked into. People should know if they’re going on Erasmus, it’s hard work and that is why you are going there. Participants in Focus Group B echoed this sentiment and felt that agreed selection procedures should be strictly adhered to. This was the case even when sending organisations were under pressure to complete the number of mobilities that had been agreed in their contracts. • For me the biggest achievement was dealing with the people that I actually went with to Finland! That teached (sic) me a lot. We had two people that were very difficult to deal with. So that’s actually the best thing I learned. We had a nice group of six people, but those other two were so difficult. So that’s how I learned – when I deal with difficult customers now, I think of them. Weronika • I’d definitely be more specific about who they let go on it. Without being rude, there were people that just were not motivated to do it and it ruined – not ruined, I mean, I wouldn’t change the way I did it – but affected our experience. But some people just weren’t motivated enough. Cathy • And they blamed the course, they blamed Erasmus – they blamed [the project coordinator], they gave her a lot of grief. She basically got the brunt of it – ‘you didn’t organise this’ – but at the end of the day it wasn’t because of her. We were told before we left that we’d have to be very independent. Steven • But they wanted their hands to be held. They didn’t like it when basically [the project coordinator] slapped the wrist and said, ‘You can’t do that.’ Sonia • They need to be a bit strict because they said [selection] was based on attendance but there were people not listening to that and taking loads of holidays and they were still allowed to go as well. Which wasn’t fair for those who actually put in the work to go. Cathy
41
