How aggressive lending came back to bite South African bank Abil| Reuters JOHANNESBURG Unemployed South African construction worker Daniel isn't sure how he fell so deeply in debt. All he knows is that African Bank Investments ABLJ.J, which was bailed out this month, kept offering him money and he kept taking. "I can't remember now, I can't remember each and every cent I spent," he said. At 62 and with a junior high school education, he admits he doesn't understand how interest works. For years African Bank, known as Abil, made high-interest loans to millions of lower-income, black South Africans like Daniel, even when bank statements produced to obtain the loan showed they would have struggled to service their debts, according to court documents in cases brought by the bank against defaulting borrowers. Daniel's 226,000 rand of debt ($21,300) became the South African taxpayer's problem on Aug. 10, when the central bank said it would buy Abil's 17 billion rand bad loan portfolio after the lender revealed it would make a full-year loss and needed to raise more capital for the second time in a year. As part of the rescue, the central bank appointed a PricewaterhouseCoopers executive as Abil's curator, tasked with restructuring the bank. The curator, Tom Winterboer, declined to comment for this story. The credit regulator has defended its oversight of Abil. Against a backdrop of labor unrest in the mining industry and rising fuel and food prices, the regulator said some problems were beyond the bank's control. "Consumer over-indebtedness is not only caused by reckless lending and borrowing, but also micro and macro economic factors that have a direct impact on the debt repayment capacity of consumers, some of which occur after the granting of credit," the regulator said. South Africa's central bank governor Gill Marcus said the bank played an important role in the country's financial system by providing credit to lower income borrowers. Reuters has examined more than two dozen court filings by the bank against defaulters at the Johannesburg High Court. These papers reveal that it made loans to at least six people despite holding evidence that the borrowers under-reported their expenses. Case documents obtained from another source show it also made repeated loans to a woman who had an existing court judgement against her for defaulting on another debt. In some cases, such as Daniel's, the bank kept lending so customers could pay off existing loans, creating a vicious cycle of indebtedness. There is no suggestion that the bank acted unlawfully, but the documents show it made loans to