98
mass. Body cell mass shared 50.98 ± 4.62% of fat free mass on average. Extracellular mass proportion was lower than body cell mass (Table 24); ECM/BCM ratio thus indicated a value adequate for elite sport (Table 24). Exact values of body composition parameters are presented in Table 24. Table 24 Body composition of elite female basketball players – BIA 2000M (Malá et al., 2011). Parameter
Mean
Standard deviation
Minimum
Maximum
TBW (l)
41.20
3.03
35.00
46.30
α (°)
6.81
0.43
6.10
7.60
ECM (kg)
24.54
2.03
21.80
27.20
BCM (kg)
30.61
2.71
25.20
34.90
0.80
0.06
0.70
0.90
ECW (l)
17.59
2.25
13.50
21.80
ICW (l)
23.66
0.96
21.50
25.50
CQ (%)
50.98
4.62
36.69
55.37
FFM (kg)
60.30
5.42
50.12
69.50
0.79
0.02
0.74
0.81
%FM (%)
21.22
1.66
18.72
25.60
FM (kg)
16.34
2.72
12.36
22.52
ECM/BCM
FFMrel
Note: TBW – total body water, α – phase angle, ECM – extracellular mass, BCM – body cell mass, ECM/BCM – extracellular mass and body cell mass ratio, ECW – extracellular water, ICW – intracellular water, CQ – percentage proportion of body cell mass in fat free mass, FFM – fat free mass, FFMrel – relative value of fat free mass, % FM – fat mass, FM – fat mass (kg).
b) Descriptive characteristics of the parameters examined by means of InBody method are presented in Table 25 and Figure 24. A significant difference in fluid distribution in the limbs was recorded only in the arms (t14 = 2.47; p < 0.05) (Table 26). On the other hand, in the legs, we found equal proportion of fluid volume with an insignificant difference between the examined segments (t14 = –0.862; p > 0.05).
Ukázka elektronické knihy, UID: KOS204676