Thirty thoughts on The Head & the Load WILLIAM KENTRIDGE
I SHOUT THINK THINK THINK! THE FACT THE FACT THE FACT KABOOM! KABOOM! KABOOM! (This is a fair idea of progress.)
an essay, to not give a lecture. By that I mean to not start with a series of facts and knowledge that the makers of the piece have, which they give to an audience who they assume knows less than them, in the way that a teacher would give a lecture to a student. 2. The lecture we did not have
THESE ARE A SERIES OF NOTES made after the event,
a reverse engineering to find the thoughts and processes behind the production The Head & the Load. They are written after the first two iterations of the performance—in the Turbine Hall of the Tate Modern in London and in Duisburg, at the Ruhrtriennale. There is the clarity of hindsight, but what I want to track down is more than this. I want to see whether the starting principles of the piece hold. Can the making, the process itself, be a way of arriving at an understanding (in this case of the relationship of World War I to colonialism, a topic itself only revealed in the process of making)? And also (and in this question I am on uncertain grounds) to show whether, in the technique and process of making The Head & the Load, we can find an understanding of the history itself as a provisional construction of reconfigured fragments. 1. Neither hero nor villain
Is it possible to tell a story without telling it through the story of one individual—the girl, the soldier, the hero—standing in for the whole war? To make not a tragedy, which is always constructed around one person, perhaps not even a comedy. But to work from understanding history (or the past) as fragmented and understanding history as a construction of fragments that make a provisional understanding of the past. Here we have a choice: to hide the joints between the different fragments, or to show the white scars of the joints of the reconstructed vase and to show the completed vessel made up of so many shards. Our task was to make a piece of theater that has a trajectory rather than a narrative, but also to avoid
What we would have said in such a lecture: The first shots in anger in World War I were fired in Togo on August 3, 1914. The war in Africa finished ten days after the armistice, when news of the end of the war in Europe was confirmed. The campaigns in Togo, Cameroon, German South West Africa, German East Africa. The thirty thousand soldiers killed. The three hundred thousand porters or carriers killed (the vast majority through disease). The one million civilians dead. The chasing of the German, Paul von LettowVorbeck, in a campaign of cat and mouse in German East Africa. The hiding of boats in the side waterways. Carrying a boat from Cape Town to Lake Tanganyika. The resupply zeppelin that got as far as Khartoum. And the brief history of colonialism. 3. The completion of the Conference of Berlin
The lecture would have talked about the Conference of Berlin in 1884 in which the African continent was divided up between European powers in the hope of avoiding conflict. The fact that one could see World War I as the completion of the Conference of Berlin and the rearrangement of the map of Africa. All the German colonies—Togo, East Togo, Cameroon, German South West Africa, German East Africa—become either French or British at the end of the War, with sections given to Portugal and Belgium too. One could see the First World War as a colonial conflict; the struggle over Africa being played out both in Africa and in Europe.
283
EXB-KENTRIDGE_BAT-DECOUPE-AR-CA.indd 283
06/01/2020 18:26