Clerks Transcripts of Shiloh v Shiloh

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

Page 1

·1· · · · · · SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ·2· · · · · · · · · IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN ·3· · · · · · · · · · · METROPOLITAN DIVISION ·4· · · · · HON. STEPHEN D. SCHUETT, JUDGE, DEPARTMENT 10 ·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·--o0o-·6 · · ·7· · · ·8· · · ·9· · · 10· · · 11· · · 12· · · 13· · · 14

·_________________________ · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) ·KENNETH SHILOH, ET AL,· · ) · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) ·Plaintiffs,· · · · · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) · · · · · ·vs.· · · · · · ·) · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) ·KENNARD SHILOH, ET AL,· · ) · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) · · · · · ·Defendants.· · ·) ·_________________________ ) · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) ·And Related Cross-Actions.) ·_________________________ )

Pages 1 - 6 Case No. BCV-16-101157 Bakersfield, California April 6, 2018

15 · · · · · · · · ·REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 16 17· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·APPEARANCES: 18 19· · ·For the Plaintiff:· ·In Propria Persona 20 · · 21· · · 22·

· · · ·

·For Defendant· · · · LT Pacific Law Group ·County of Los· · · · By:· MR. KENNETH K. TANJI, ESQ. ·Angeles:· · · · · · ·17800 Castleton Street, Suite 560 · · · · · · · · · · · City of Industry, CA 91748

23 24 25 26· · ·Reported By: · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Amy Maier, CSR No. 13248 27· · · · · · · · · · · · · Official Court Reporter 28

Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

·1 · · ·2 · · ·3 · · ·4 · · ·5·

Page 2

· · · · · · · · · · · · · SESSIONS · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE ·FRIDAY, APRIL 6, 2018 · · ·MORNING SESSION· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·3 · · ·Motion for Judgment on Pleadings· · · · · · · · · 3

·6 ·7 ·8 ·9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

YVer1f

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

Page 3

·1· · · · · · BAKERSFIELD, CA; FRIDAY, APRIL 6, 2018 ·2· · · · · · · · · · · ·MORNING SESSION ·3· · ·DEPARTMENT 10· · · · HON. STEPHEN D. SCHUETT, JUDGE ·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·--o0o-·5· · · · · · THE COURT:· Shiloh versus Shiloh, et al, Case ·6· ·Number BCV-16-101157. ·7· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· Ken Tanji for the County of Los ·8· ·Angeles, for John Coleman. ·9· · · · · · THE COURT:· If you could spell your last name 10· ·for the reporter, please.

11· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· T-a-n-j-i, on court call.

12· · · · · · THE COURT:· Do I have an appearance for 13· ·Plaintiff?

14· · · · · · MR. SHILOH:· Kenneth Shiloh, court call.

15· · · · · · THE COURT:· We're here on the motion for 16· ·judgment on the pleadings brought by Defendant County of 17· ·Los Angeles.· Go through the Court's tentative.· Court's 18· ·tentative at this time is to grant the Defense motion 19· ·for failure to state a cause of action with respect to 20· ·the second and fourth cause of action.· Court will 21· ·provide leave to amend.· That will be 20 days' leave.

22· ·Court will grant the motion as to the third cause of 23· ·action without leave to amend.· Court will also grant 24· ·the motion with respect to the failure to state grounds 25· ·for punitive damages, with 20 days' leave to amend.

26· ·Court will deny all other bases.

27· · · · · · Just so the parties know what the Court's 28· ·thinking is on this, it appears that even if I take Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

YVer1f

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

Page 4

·1· ·judicial notice of the various documents that the County ·2· ·has asked me to take judicial notice of, the pleading of ·3· ·the two fraud and negligence causes of action are so ·4· ·vague and uncertain I can't tell -- without the other ·5· ·tort claims filed by Plaintiff with the County, I don't ·6· ·know if they're covered, not covered because I haven't ·7· ·seen those.· I did get the one that was filed with ·8· ·respect to the December 9th, 2011 -- I believe it's ·9· ·2014, claim.· With respect to the request that the Court 10· ·is granting the motion on the failure to file the 11· ·required tort claim, I'm going to deny it at this time 12· ·without prejudice.

13· · · · · · With respect to the lack of jurisdiction, the 14· ·Court's review of the minute order indicates -- did not 15· ·indicate that the first amended complaint was dismissed 16· ·with prejudice; therefore, the Court believes it does 17· ·have jurisdiction in this case to proceed.

18· · · · · · With respect to the third cause of action, the 19· ·Court does not see a way for Plaintiff to allege the 20· ·County to come within any of the statutory provisions 21· ·alluded to by Plaintiff.· So the Court believes it's 22· ·going to grant that again without leave to amend.

23· · · · · · Mr. Tanji, you want to be heard?

24· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· Your Honor, did you say for the 25· ·second and fourth causes of action, that it's granted 26· ·with leave to amend?

27· · · · · · THE COURT:· Yes, 20 days' leave to amend.

28· ·Third cause of action was granted without leave to Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

YVer1f

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

Page 5

·1· ·amend. ·2· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· Second and fourth? ·3· · · · · · THE COURT:· Second and fourth with leave to ·4· ·amend, third without leave to amend.· Punitive damages ·5· ·claims with leave to amend. ·6· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· Then you said the first amended ·7· ·complaint was dismissed without prejudice and, ·8· ·therefore, you felt the Court has jurisdiction? ·9· · · · · · THE COURT:· The minute order from the 10· ·L.A. County Superior Court does not indicate it's with 11· ·prejudice.· It's simply for failure of Mr. Shiloh to 12· ·prosecute, so I don't see that there was an order made 13· ·with prejudice.

14· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· As far as the second or fourth 15· ·cause of action, the reason was basically based on not 16· ·being able to see all the claims that Mr. Shiloh filed?

17· · · · · · THE COURT:· Correct.

18· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· I have nothing further for the 19· ·County, then.

20· · · · · · THE COURT:· Mr. Shiloh?

21· · · · · · MR. SHILOH:· Nothing further, Your Honor.

22· · · · · · THE COURT:· Mr. Tanji, the defendant will 23· ·prepare the order for me, please.

24· · · · · · MR. TANJI:· We'll prepare an order and notice.

25· · · · · · THE COURT:· Thank you.

26· · · · · · (Proceedings in the above-entitled 27· · · · · · matter were concluded.)

28 Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

Page 6

·1· ·STATE OF CALIFORNIA· ) · · · · · · · · · · · · · )· SS. ·2· ·COUNTY OF KERN· · · ·) ·3 ·4 ·5 ·6· · · · · · I, Amy Maier, CSR No. 13248, Official ·7· ·Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, ·8· ·Kern County Superior Court, do hereby certify that the ·9· ·foregoing transcript in the matter of SHILOH vs. SHILOH, 10· ·Case No. BCV-16-101157, April 6, 2018, consisting of 11· ·pages numbered 1 through 6, inclusive, is a complete, 12· ·true, and correct transcription of the stenographic 13· ·notes as taken by me in the above-entitled matter.

14· · · · · · Dated this 1st day of October, 2019.

15 16 17 18 19 20· · · · · · · · ·________________________________________ · · · · · · · · · ·Amy Maier, CSR 21· · · · · · · · ·Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 13248 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

¡Index: --o0o--..reporter

basically 5:15 --o0o-- 3:4

BCV-16-101157 3:6 believes 4:16,21 brought 3:16

1 10 3:3 CA 3:1 call 3:11,14

20 3:21,25 4:27

case 3:5 4:17

2011 4:8

claim 4:9,11

2014 4:9

claims 4:5 5:5,16

2018 3:1

Coleman 3:8 complaint 4:15 5:7 6

Correct 5:17 County 3:7,16 4:1,5,20

6 3:1

5:10,19

9 9th 4:8 A

court 3:5,9,11,12,14,

M

file 4:10 filed 4:5,7 5:16

made 5:12

fourth 3:20 4:25 5:2,3,

minute 4:14 5:9

14

MORNING 3:2

fraud 4:3

motion 3:15,18,22,24

FRIDAY 3:1

4:10

G

N

grant 3:18,22,23 4:22

negligence 4:3

granted 4:25,28

notice 4:1,2 5:24

granting 4:10

Number 3:6

grounds 3:24 O H

Court's 3:17,27 4:14

heard 4:23

covered 4:6

HON 3:3

order 4:14 5:9,12,23,24 P

Honor 4:24 5:21 D

18,25,28 5:15

alluded 4:21

26,27,28 5:3,4,5

Los 3:7,17

5:11

15,20,22,23,26 4:9,16, 19,21,27 5:3,8,9,10,17, 20,22,25

action 3:19,20,23 4:3, allege 4:19

failure 3:19,24 4:10

leave 3:21,23,25 4:22,

felt 5:8 C

2

lack 4:13 F

J damages 3:25 5:4

parties 3:27 Plaintiff 3:13 4:5,19,21 pleading 4:2

days' 3:21,25 4:27

John 3:8

pleadings 3:16

December 4:8

JUDGE 3:3

prejudice 4:12,16 5:7,

amended 4:15 5:6

defendant 3:16 5:22

judgment 3:16

Angeles 3:8,17

Defense 3:18

judicial 4:1,2

appearance 3:12

deny 3:26 4:11

jurisdiction 4:13,17

appears 3:28

DEPARTMENT 3:3

APRIL 3:1

dismissed 4:15 5:7

amend 3:21,23,25 4:22, 26,27 5:1,4,5

Kenneth 3:14

et al 3:5

provisions 4:20 punitive 3:25 5:4

BAKERSFIELD 3:1 based 5:15

proceed 4:17

provide 3:21 K Ken 3:7

E

prepare 5:23,24

prosecute 5:12

5:8

documents 4:1 B

11,13

L

bases 3:26 L.A. 5:10

Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

R reason 5:15 reporter 3:10

October 01, 2019 3:25PM

KENNETH SHILOH vs KENNARD SHILOH Case No. BCV-16-101157

·Index: request..versus

request 4:9 required 4:11 respect 3:19,24 4:8,9, 13,18

review 4:14 S SCHUETT 3:3 SESSION 3:2 Shiloh 3:5,14 5:11,16, 20,21

simply 5:11 spell 3:9 state 3:19,24 statutory 4:20 STEPHEN 3:3 Superior 5:10 T T-A-N-J-I 3:11 Tanji 3:7,11 4:23,24 5:2,6,14,18,22,24

tentative 3:17,18 thinking 3:28 time 3:18 4:11 tort 4:5,11 U uncertain 4:4 V vague 4:4 versus 3:5

Superior Court of the State of California County of Kern

October 01, 2019 3:25PM