Issuu on Google+

MC PlusOne

GIP GIP & GCDP Report January 2012 made ade by Katka Katka & Zuska

1

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

General part The first part of general statistics is devoted to comparing GIP & GCDP results between 2010 and 2011. As you can see in the following graphs comparing to last year we are much better in terms of GCDP in all raises, matches and realizations. However, the situation on GIP side is not that bright.

GCDP January

GIP January

22

16

14 10

11 4

Raised

14

13

Matched

9

2011

4

2

2012

Raised

Realized

2011

5

2012

Matched

Realized

In the next part you can see the comparison of the plan and reality in GIP and GCDP as well as how much we contributed to fulfill Q1 plan so far. As you can see, we managed to overachieve plan in raises and almost hit the plan of realizations. However, we still need to work on matching more.

GIP RA

GIP MA

46

5

33

10

January

Plan

10

Plan

12 4

Reality Q1

January

4

Reality

Q1

GIP RE 26 11

10

10

Plan Reality

January

2

Q1

AIESEC Slovakia | DvojkrĂ­Ĺžna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

The situation on GCDP side is a bit better. However, taking into consideration that January is the strongest month in terms of realizations, we have to be careful about plan fulfillment in the upcoming two months.

GCDP RA

GCDP MA MA 46

35

8

13

20

Plan

13

14

14

Reality January

Plan Reality

Q1

January

Q1

GCDP RE 55 38 22

22

Plan Reality

January

Q1

In the following graph, you can find the fulfillment of the plan for term 2011/2012. The percentage of plan fulfillment is: GIP – 32% 32%, GCDP – 38%, 38%, Together (GIP+GCDP) – 35%. 35%. For better picture, in order to hit the goal of 366 realizations by the end of June we need 1,6 realization EVERY DAY.

Fulfillment of the plan 11/12 366

202 164 128 52

GIP

3

76

GCDP

Plan 11/12 July - Jan

GIP+GCDP

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

The third part is devoted to contribution of individual LCs to the results of AIESEC Slovakia in Q4.. As you can see Comenius University was the LC that contributed the most to January results. There are however, 3 LCs that did not bring any results in GIP this month.

GIP Realizations Realizations January

25%

25% BB

BA

50% CU

KE

NR

TT

In GCDP the contribution is more diverse, except except of LC Bratislava, all LCs brought some results, Comenius University and Nitra being the major contributors.

GCDP Realizations January

18%

41% BB

4

BA

27%

5% CU

KE

NR

9%

TT

AIESEC Slovakia | DvojkrĂ­Ĺžna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

Outgoing Programs Programs To start with, following table is showing you how the LCs are performing in terms of plan fulfillment. As you can see majority of the LCs did not overcome 25% of their January plan fulfillment. In terms of Skia contribution, Nitra contributed the most in this month. LC

Bratislava Comenius University Banská Bystrica Košice Nitra Trnava

Fulfillment towards LC plan (January) (January) 5,88% 20%

Fulfillment towards Skia reality (January) (January) 10% 10%

16,67% 16,67% 62,5% 25%

10% 10% 50% 10%

January general performance The following graphs are showing you how the LCs but as well Slovakia performed in OGP in terms of GCDP and GIP. As you can see we planned pretty high numbers for this month, however, we barely achieved 28% 28% of the plan.

Plan vs. Reality GCDP January Number of GCDP OGP

18

16

16 14

12

12 10 7

8 6

4

4

5 5

4

4

GCDP reality

4 2

0

0

0

BA

BB

CU

1

GCDP plan

1

0

5

KE

NR

TT

Skia

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

Plan vs. Reality GI P January 13

GIP Number of G IP OGP

14 12 10 8

GIP plan

5

6 4

2

1

2

1

1 1

BB

CU

3

2

3

0

0

0 0

KE

NR

TT

GIP reality

0 BA

Skia

January LCs LCs performance LC Bratislava

LC Comenius University

BA January OGP OGP

CU January OGP OGP

17

5

5 3

Plan 2

0

Raised

3

2

Matched

1

Reality

Realized

Plan 1

1

Raised

LC Banská Bystrica

Matched

1

Reality

Realized

LC Nitra

BB January OGP

NR January OGP 11

9

8 Plan 2 0

2

0

Raised

6

Matched

1

Realized

Reality

5 3

2

Raised

3

Plan Reality

Matched

Realized

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

LC Košice

LC Trnava

KE January OGP

TT January OGP 4

6

4

3

4 3

Plan 1

Raised

1

Matched

1

Plan 1

Reality

0

Realized

0

Raised

Matched

Reality

Realized

Slovakia

Skia Q4 OGP 29

27

14

13

Raised

Plan

13

Matched

10

Reality

Realized

Raising: January was not that strong month for raising. However, there are still some LCs that were doing well in raising – Trnava and Comenius University overachieved their plans ☺ Overally we are only 1 raise short in January.

Matching: In this area we didn t perform perform that well. We managed to hit only half of the month goal. We have Trnava as the LC that overachieved the goal, Banská Bystrica that hit the goal and Bratislava that missed only 1 match.

Realization: This area was the worst on performance this month. None of the LCs managed to hit their goals

One of the reasons is also postponing of realization assignment in the

system, system, so be carefull with that and track it properly. Month by month we are deepening the gap in realizations. Do you still believe in your plan? How can YOU contribute to lowering the gap? Let s work on it together ☺

7

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

February plan Slovakia Raised Matched Realized

Plan 20 13 18

Current Reality 1 0 4

Plan for term 20112011-2012 OGP OGP Overall GIP GCDP

Plan 245 108 137

Reality 84 38 46

As you can see we did not move much since last report. Just for you to imagine it more easily, if we want to catch up with the results it would mean for us 1,10 of realization PER DAY. DAY It is not impossible, but it is not a small target to hit. How can we help each other to achieve Skia plan? Recognition I would like to recognize LC Trnava for overachieving their raising and matching goals this month ☺

8

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

Incoming Programs Programs Firstly, let’s check LC's fulfillment towards their plan and results of AIESEC Slovakia generally. LC

Bratislava Comenius University Banská Bystrica Košice Nitra Trnava

Fulfillment towards LC plan (January) (January) 0% 142,9 142,9% 2,9%

Fulfillment towards Skia reality (January) (January) 0% 62,5% 62,5%

100% 100% 0% 50% 50% 50% 50%

25% 25% 0% 6,25% 6,25% 6,25% 6,25%

As you can see, LCs which fulfilled their plan are LC BB and LC CU which actually act overcame the plan.. In terms of results of AIESEC Skia, Skia, LCs which mostly mostl contributed to the results were obviously LC CU with 62,5% and LC BB with 25%.

January general performance Plan vs. Reality GCDP January Number of GCDP IC

20

18 15

15 9

10

GCDP plan

6 5

4

4 4

3

0

2 0

1

2

GCDP reality

1

0 BA

BB

CU

KE

NR

TT

Skia

Also in January, LCs were better performing in n GCDP. Together all LCs managed to realize 15 TNs, what is quite nice number but still still missing 3 realizations to fulfill the plan for AIESEC Skia. In terms of GIP, there ere is just one realization done by LC CU. Other LCs either didn’t plan any realization because of GCDP realization peak or didn’t fulfill the plan. plan

9

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

Plan vs. Reality GIP January Number of GCDP IC

4,5

4

4 3,5 3 2,5

2

GIP plan

2 1,5

1

1 1

1

1 0,5

0

0 0

BA

BB

0

0 0

0 0

KE

NR

TT

GIP reality

0 CU

LC Bratislava

Skia

LC Comenius University

BA January ICP

CU January ICP

7

10 5

7 Plan

0

0

Raised

0 Matched

0

Reality

Realized

Plan 2 0

4

Plan Reality

0

10

3 2

2

Matched

Realized

NR January ICP

4

1

Raised

Matched

LC Nitra

BB January ICP

2

Reality

0

Raised

LC Banská Bystrica

2

Realized

1 0 Raised

0

Reality

0

Matched

Plan

Realized

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

LC Košice

LC Trnava

KE January ICP

TT January ICP

5

3

3

2 Plan

0

0

Raised

0 Matched

0

1

1

1

Reality

Reality

0

Realized

Raised

Plan

Matched

Realized

Raising: In terms of raising, most of the LCs overcame their plan thanks to raises rai coming for national project AIESEC to Kids. Furthermore, there were also 2 GIP raises done by LC NR and LC CU focused on market research and project management.

Matching: Also in January we didn’t manage to match any of current available GIP forms. There were just 5 GCDP matc atches on national level. The main focus in February has to be definitely matching as there is almost any pipeline for realizations.

Realization: In terms of realizations, all LCs manage to realize together 16 TNs with division of 15 GCDP realizations and 1 GIP realization.

Slovakia Slovakia

Skia January ICP 22 16

15 10

10

Plan Reality

5

Raised

Matched

Realized

February plan Slovakia Raised Matched Realized

11

Plan 13 9 9

Current Reality 0 1 1

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

As I mentioned before, February will be about catching the gap of matching from previous period. We have now 12 GCDP TNs available from which 9 TNs are for project AIESEC to Kids and 16 GIP TNs available. To have some more realizations in Q1 and Q2 we have to match them as soon as possible. What is more, February should be also about raising. As you could see in the previous report, LCs made really good job in terms of calling and meetings in Q4 so now it is time to follow up the launched cooperation. And just for you to see how we stand with our overall plan: Plan for term 20112011-2012 ICP ICP ICP ICP Overall GIP GCDP

Plan 121 56 65

Reality 49 14 35

In the following table you can see some indicators of performance which were recorded in January. Unfortunately, the data for this month is not completed as some of the LCs didn’t provide necessary information for that. Generally, the performance of LCs dropped mainly because of exam period on all university. Also, most of LCs focused more on NDK selling this month. GIP: LCs managed to go for 7 meetings meetings in January. January The rate between 1st and follow-up meeting is 1,75, 75 it means that to set 1 follow-up GIP meeting, there is need to experience at least 2 first meetings. The rate between meetings and raises is 3,5 (7/2). It means that for 1 raise, we needed to attend in January at least 4 meetings. GCDP: LCs managed to go for 16 meetings. meetings The rate between 1st and follow-up meeting is 1,67 1,67, 67 it means that to set 1 follow-up GCDP meeting, there is need to experience at least 2 first meetings. The rate between meetings and raises is 2 (16/8). It means that for 1 raise, we needed to attend in January at least 2 meetings. You can see that number of initiatives organized for interns is still quite high, 14 initiatives. It is proof that even there was exam period, LCs managed to take care of our lovely interns. GOOD JOB!! I am sure our internships are really quality.

Calls 1st meeting GIP 1st meeting GCDP FollowFollow-up mtg GIP FollowFollow-up mtg GCDP Meetings GIP

12

January 24 3 6 4 10 7

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


MC PlusOne

Meetings GCDP GCDP Number of initiatives organized on LCs Number of LC2LC coco-operations set Number of LC2MC coco-operations set Number of initiatives organized for interns: Number of networking events attended

16 3 1 0 14 2

Finally, I would like to highlight 2 LCs which successfully realized and still running their first GCDP projects, LC CU and LC BB. Congratulation, I am sure that I will read just positive references for your projects.

That’s it from our side! Katka & Zuska

13

AIESEC Slovakia | Dvojkrížna 47, 82107 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, +421 2 45 52 61 10


GIP&GCDP report_January