Most Common Reasons Beneficiaries or Heirs Borrow When a parent dies and leaves his or her estate to children and other heirs, the estate assets must be equalized before any money or property can be distributed. Oftentimes, trustees or administrators who must worry about paying the cash-poor trust or estate’s expenses find there is too little cash in the estate to achieve these goals. As a result, trustees and administrators are often forced to sell valuable property in order to raise the money needed to pay basic expenses.
Banks and credit unions aren’t the most helpful entities in this situation, mostly due to risk-averse policies. They won’t typically make loans to trusts or estates, or they tend to make them so prohibitive that they are not worth the hassle. By contrast, a private loan from HCS Equity provides a convenient and more affordable solution, offering faster review and approval with no prepayment penalties, more flexible terms, and availability of funds within a shorter period of time.
Private loans can infuse a trust or estate with the cash needed to achieve the family’s goals without having to sell real estate assets, points out Mara Erlach, senior counsel at Greene Radovsky Share and Hennigh LLP on behalf of HCS Equity.
A private loan made to an irrevocable trust or estate allows trustees or administrators to borrow against real estate assets owned by the trust or estate. The following are a few reasons why it would make sense for beneficiaries to borrow via a private loan in these circumstances.
Avoiding Property Tax Reassessments with Prop 58 or Prop 193
One reason beneficiaries take out private trust loans is so they can file for Proposition 58 in California and thereby avoid a property tax reassessment. Real estate owned by trusts have likely been in the family for decades. Properties in California that have been owned for long periods of time usually have a very low tax assessment relative to their current value because of Proposition 13, which limits the annual increase on the existing property tax assessment value.
To recap, Proposition 58 stipulates that real property transfers, from parent to child or child to parent, are excluded from reassessment. By extension, Proposition 193 brings tax relief to include transfers