SANY STS Presentation. Types of STS

Page 1

Quality Changes the World

SANY STS


CONTENTS

I. Product Introduction II. Business Environment III.Competitiveness Analysis

2


I. Product Introduction 1. Types & Performances of Container Cranes (RMQC) 2. Functions and Operations of NEE Type Container Crane

3


1. Types & Performances of Container Cranes 1-1. Single Trolley Type (RMQC) Typical Container Crane â‘

Tandem Type Container Crane (ZPMC) ③

- Generally installed & operated at all world ports.

- Focus on the mega container vessels and rapid container handling.

- Waiting time occurs between a crane and a carrier when loading/unloading, van carrier does not arrive. - Insufficient in reducing vessel waiting time at port for the mega vessels appeared.

- Waiting time occurs between a crane and a carrier when loading/unloading, van carrier does not arrive. - Waiting time occurs a lot when positioning while holding containers and loading them onto carrier. (Low Productivity) -It can not perform a role as Tandem type ,Just 4 using same as single type.


1. Types & Performances of Container Cranes 1-2. Dual Trolley Type (RMQC) Dual Container Crane ②

- Available with productivity increase and automated ports. - Productivity decreases due to the operation interference (collision) when operating the main trolley and the 2nd trolley within the buffer zone.

New Container Crane ④

- Available with high productivity and automation.

- Carrier waiting time is reduced as twistlocks are loaded/unloaded in the Conveyor (buffer zone, Ⓔ). - Prevents from interferences (collision) between the main trolley and the 2nd trolley by Conveyor transferring function. 5


1. Types & Performances of Container Cranes 1-3. Functions (Performances) of Container Cranes (RMQC) Single Trolley Type

Dual Trolley Type

Typical Container Crane

Tandem Type Container Crane

Dual Trolley Type Container Crane

NCC Type Container Crane

Single Operation

Single Operation

Divided Operation

Divided Operation

Wheel Load

95~100 ton

ton

ton

100~104 ton

Handling Capacity (Moves/hr)

32 Moves/hr

≒ Moves/hr

≒ Moves/hr

52 Moves/hr

Gravity - Top

Gravity - Top

Gravity - Bottom

Gravity - Bottom

No fit

No fit

Fit

Very fit

Waiting time occurs

Waiting time occurs a lot

※※

Operation Method

Price Stability Automation

Connectivity (btw tractor & crane)

Although loading/unloading operations were divided, productivity and operation connectivity decrease as interferences (collision) occur between the main trolley and the 2nd trolley within the buffer zone.

※※ NCC Container Crane transfers containers horizontally to prevent from the interferences (collision) within the buffer zone. So the main trolley and the 2nd trolley can be operated at a certain place, productivity and operation connectivity increase. 6


2. Funt. and Oper. Of NCC Type Container Crane 2-1. Elevator Layout of Container Crane

Function

- Up/Down containers at â“‘ Space using a pole of the sea side on the container crane

Elevator Up Down

- Up/Down Elevator using a wire rope on the drum Operation

- Operation of Elevator being used a wire rope on the crane. 7


2. Funt. and Oper. of NCC Type Container Crane 2-2. Conveyor (Buffer Zone)

Function

Layout of Container Crane

Conveyor (Buffer Zone)

- Installing conveyor system on to the crane with Sill Beam and Portal Beam of the sea side, and moving containers at â“’ Space

- Down containers by the elevator and move them with the conveyor system

- Buffer Zone - The space to be used for Twistlock works

Operation

- At constant work place, works automatic or manual of Twistlock on/off. 8


2. Funt. and Oper. NCC Type Container Crane 2-3. Second Trolley & Spreader 2nd Trolley

Layout of Container Crane

Function

- Move the containers at ⓓ space by 2nd Trolley on the rails installed on of the above of the portal beam on the crane ” Recently Using Technique.

Operation

- Put it on the truck by 2nd trolley spreader the container of the right end being transferred - Quick deal with once a truck comes 9


II. Business Environment 1. Global Market of Container Cranes (RMQC)

10


1. Global Market of Container Cranes (RMQC) Container Cranes or Ship to Shore Cranes (RMQC) 2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

China

78

56

126

95

41

Other Asia

69

57

44

113

117

Europe

68

83

91

101

99

42

43

22

26

25

17

18

39

45

20

53

39

25

17

19

27

23

2

14

8

1

1

253

339

368

430

384

North America Cent South America Caribbean

11

Mid East/P Gulf/ Red Sea Africa

Australasia

TOTAL

11


III. Competitiveness Analysis 1. Competitiveness Core Factors

2. Terminals with Typical Crane or NCC Crane

12


1. Competitiveness Core Factors Vessels became super size to reduce cost of container transfer

Competitive Factors

Productivity

Productivity increased 163% than typical container cranes.

 Rapid handling (Port) (Containership)

Connectivity

Smooth connectivity between cargo handling equipment and tractors.

Safety

Gravity Center – Understructure

Applicability

Able to install at currently constructed ports as well as handling operation smoothly performs.

: reduces containerships’ laying time at ports : contains a number of containerships : reduces generating oil of refrigerated containers

 High efficiency port operation

: When containerships berthed at port  high efficiency system : When no containerships berthed at port  low cost system

 Building ports making low carbon emission 13


2. Terminals with Typical Crane or NCC Crane 2-1. Crane Arrangement if Building 4.25 million TEU Container Terminal

ď ś Terminal with NCC Cranes

ď ś Terminal with Typical Cranes

14


2. Terminals with Typical Crane or NCC Crane 2-2. Cost & Efficiency if Building 4.25 million TEU Container Terminal Berth

Rental / Year

Mechanical Productivity

Container Crane (RMQC)

Yard Remark

Crane

Worker

TC

YT

Typical Crane

5 berths

7.6 million US$ x5

32 (Moves/hr) X17 cranes

17 cranes x 8.8 million US$

1 crane x 16 workers x 17 cranes = 272 workers

42

93

US$

NCC Crane

3 berths

7.6 million US$ x3

52 (Moves/hr) X11 cranes

11 cranes x 10.6 million US$

1 crane x 16 workers x 11 cranes = 176 workers

42

93

US$

②+28 Moves/hr

-33.6 million US$

③ -96 workers x 2 shifts -4.4m US$/yr

Total

① -2 -15.2m US$ / yr

-33.6m US$ / investment

-19.6m US$/yr annually

※ Annually 19.6 million US$ can be reduced if operating 4.25 million TEU Container Terminal. ① Can operate quay berths of container terminals more efficiently and the remaining 2 berths are also available. ② NCC crane’s productivity improvement can reduce generating oil of refrigerated containers and can reduce CO₂ emission of container terminals. - A containership in size of 8,000TEU sails 22 knots, oil of 260ton/day consumes (126,380 US$)

③ Can reduce the number of workers supporting container cranes. - (1 container crane X 16 workers X -6 C/C = 96 workers) X (2 shifts) = 192 workers/day

④ Can reduce tractors’ waiting time of 15 seconds when loading / unloading twistlocks. - If calculating the waiting time of tractors at a terminal with capacity of 4.25 million TEU, e.g.) 4,250,000 x 15 sec = 63,750,000sec ⇒ (17,708 hrs/yr) can be reduced.

- Tractor drivers reduced. (2 tractors x 2 shifts = 4 drivers) & tractor oil reduced ( CO₂reduced)

15


16


We believes NEW CONTAINER CRANE will definitely help you to construct the world best Hub Port with using this techniques and skilled structure manufacturing technologies if you give us an opportunity.

NEW CONTAINER CRANE is appropriate that containerships meet the shipping companies’ requirement which means they shall leave the port within 16 hours or 24 hours after cargo handling operation and it shall help you to be Hub Port or Mega Hub Port.

17


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.