Source - email
What’s happening in the false climate narrative?
Erik Bye
August 25, 2025
Introduction:
The COP29 meeting by the UN in Baku, Azerbaijan, gave a signal of «something happens.» The event is described here:
Baku disaster: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/11/22/live-at-1pmeastern-10-am-pacific-cop-29-inside-the-disaster-inbaku-the-climate-realism-show-136/
Arranging the climate magnet for the IPCC-believers in a petro-state for the second time spread a kind of alarmistic shadow over the show. The election of Donald Trump as the next president in the US installed a kind of pessimism in the discussion rooms, due to the «Trump climate show» to come.
By the more or less first Presidential Order, Trump took the US out of the Paris Agreement. The Outlaws then represented four oil-producing countries, and Yemen, Iran, Liberia, and the USA established a barrier to the abandoned, which probably feared an increased economic pressure, to follow up on The Green Deal.
This is the first sign of the fact that Trump had a plan
for a reduction of the US’s activity in climate-related questions, related to IPCC, NOAA, NASA, Mauna Loa, and other international tasks with large costs.
This is a summary of events that may indicate that the climate discussions will be disclosed as a scientific Fraud. The discussion around man-made climate change is the worst scientific betrayal ever!
What has happened (1):
Donald Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris agreement.
Now there are four large oil production countries on the outside: Libya, Iran, Yemen, and the US. Is this the beginning of the end of this scientific Fraud?
https://www.sciencenorway.no/climate-climatechange-ntb-english/climate-experts-reduced-usclimate-commitment-could-influence-europe/2461062
After Donald Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Agreement, a lot has happened in the climate Issue. The anxiety and the skepticism increase, and the Green Deal «creaks».
What has happened (2):
Only 15 countries are concerned about the reporting of new climate measures to the UN, in accordance with the Paris agreement.
Something against the majority is happening:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/03/21/only-15nations-bothered-to-submit-paris-climate-pledges-ontime/ What has happened (3):
Swedish Radio (SR) has announced that the UN is lying, and that they regret this.
Here is a Swedish article with English statements in between:
https://www.sverigesradio.se/artikel/har-kan-du-lasaprogrammet-klimatkatastrofen-del-1-vi-ber-omursakt-och-backar
Much of the wrong information from the UN is confirmed in this «open» attitude. What is to be expected in the future?
What has happened (4):
Donald Trump interferes and reduces the US contribution to IPCC:
https://earth.org/trump-pulls-us-out-of-key-globalclimate-assessment-ahead-of-meeting-in-china/
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-pulls-usout-key-global-climate-assessment-sources-say-202502-20/ What has happened (5):
Donald Trump is reorganising NASA!
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/21/science/nasatrump-voyager-declaration.
What has happened (6):
Donald Trump reduced the budget of NOAA.
https://climate.law.columbia.edu/content/trumpproposes-17-billion-cut-noaa
What has happened (7):
Donald Trump has hired climate researchers who are skeptical of the IPCC!
https://www.allaboutenergy.net/? view=article&id=4414:norway-donald-trump-hashired-critical-scientific-climateexperts&catid=216&highlight=WyJhbWVyaWthIiwia2 VyaWsiLCJlcmlrIiwiYW1lcmlrYW5pc2NoZSIsImFtZXJ pa2FuaXNjaGVuIiwiamFuLWVyaWsiLCJieWUiLCJie WVzIiwiZXJpayBieWUiXQ==
The basic job is to clean up and remove all the unnecessary alarmistic administrative regulations. The Endangerment of documents from the EPA is a central and well-known task.
What has happened (8):
Bjørn Lomborg is hired to assist the editor of the Danish Newspaper Berlingske Tidende in his work on Climate skepticism.
https://klimarealistene.com/lomborg-inn-i-danskavis/
One of the most important issues is the Green Deal.
What has happened (9):
The weather stations are in bad condition.
The stations are old, badly maintained, and are even situated in unfortunate places. Several of them are placed at «warm eyes» or close to airports, and generally, places with considerable traffic.
https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/ uploads/SCC-Buesing-Weather-Station-AgeingV4.2.pdf
What has happened (10):
The temperature change before the CO2 level.
Then the CO2 can not be the cause of the increased temperature. The cause must come before the result:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/ pii/S0921818112001658
This does not worry IPCC at all. How is such a treatment of a scientific observation possible?
What has happened (11):
The observed and reported temperature data can not be trusted.
According to the climate scientists and the operators on the weather stations, the observed temperatures have to be homogenized. That means that the observed temperatures have to be adjusted if basic or standard conditions are changed or displaced. New observations have to be corrected in accordance with earlier observations.
However, this is not the operation. During the homogenization, older temperature values are systematically reduced, while the new values are increased. This gives an artificially increased global warming. This is man-made, but in a manipulative manner.
This is shown by Bye and Humlum (2025):
https://www.allaboutenergy.net/? view=article&id=4366:norway-administrative-humancaused-climate-
change&catid=216&highlight=WyJhbWVyaWthIiwia2 VyaWsiLCJlcmlrIiwiYW1lcmlrYW5pc2NoZSIsImFtZXJ pa2FuaXNjaGVuIiwiamFuLWVyaWsiLCJieWUiLCJlc mlrIGJ5ZSJd
This is pure madness, but the weather and official climate organisations do not bother!
What has happened (12):
The Climate models of IPCC exaggerate the effect of the input CO2 data.
The Nobel Prize in Physics in 2021 was awarded to
Syokuro Manabe for erroneous reasons. Roy Clark has shown that the models of Manabe, from 1967, exaggerate the effect of the input CO2 data. These models have been used in all the main reports from IPCC, from AR1 to AR6. Based on these exaggerations, the models were bound to give wrong and too high predicted temperature values.
This Nobel scandal is described here:
https://climath.substack.com/p/the-nobel-fraud
A more detailed description of the model errors is given here:
https://climatechangedispatch.com/understandingthe-seven-major-errors-in-climate-models/
There have not been any official reactions to this fraud.
What has happened (13):
The reduction in CO2 emissions to the atmosphere can not be detected. The effect is negligible:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/16/mathconfirms-foolishness-of-climate-alarmism/
This is of no concern for the UN, the IPCC and neither for the IPCC climate-believers. The alarmists seem to have been encouraged to the opposite. However, the climate Alarmism is debunked by Professor William Happer: https://www.freedom-research.org/p/exclusive-
interview-with-prof-william
What has happened (14): Is the Green Deal worth the costs?
More and more are concerned about this:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/16/mathconfirms-foolishness-of-climate-alarmism/
Obviously not, the UN and most of the member states are not concerned! What about the realism of the world economy?
What has happened (15): is the sustainability goal of the UN No. 13: «Remove Climate Change» credible at all?
The Climate is constantly changing, being a natural process. How is it possible to include such a formulation in an official document, being accepted by the whole world?
It is completely impossible to understand that this goal at all has been suggested and determined. Is it the role of God that is so attractive for those who believe in a distant determinator?
There is a growing skepticism about this:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/16/mathconfirms-foolishness-of-climate-alarmism/
But I have not seen any official scientific reaction towards this yet.
This goal does not bother the UN and the IPCC at all. What about the normal, common sense?
CONCLUDING REMARKS:
For how long has it been possible for roughly half the world to accept the false narrative described above:
Several countries have left the Paris agreement, the budgets and the importance of climate organisations have been reduced, the climate models of IPCC are completely wrong, the reduction of CO2 emissions has only a negligible effect on global warming, the Green Deal will destroy the economy of the UN's member states, and the world needs more energy. This energy has to come from coal, oil, and gas for the next decades.
This fantasy process, based on a completely global climate narrative, should come to an end as soon as possible!