Source - email
Message from IPCC: The game is over!
Erik Bye
July 6, 2025
The Game is over
According to well-informed sources, the IPCC is now planning to call off the entire climate debate. They acknowledge that climate change has natural causes. Man-made CO2 emissions are of very little importance. The atmosphere contains so much natural CO2 that the anthropogenic humanmade contribution of 3-4% is completely insignificant. Yes, even if it were to be as high as 15%, there is in principle no difference between fossil, anthropogenic CO2 or natural CO2.
Nature controls the climate
This has been known to the IPCC for 35 years, since the IPCC was established in 1988, and now the IPCC realizes that nature itself sorts out the CO2 balance and the climate. According to our sources, now there is full agreement internally, within the IPCC, that it is solar activity, cosmic radiation, water vapor and the clouds that are of greatest importance for climate change.
How to communicate?
According to the sources, the UN and the IPCC are now working on how to best communicate this conclusion, without losing all credibility. The institution is of course fully aware that the fall is quite large, not least because of the form of the debate that employees at public institutions, research institutes, as well as universities and colleges have been exposed
to. This applies in particular to academics around the world.
The Climate Research
The IPCC was established in 1988 with the aim of conducting research to stop man-made climate change. What will happen now to the institution is a completely open question. There is much that points to the possibility that all will be forgotten, that the activity will be shelved and that the staff will find something else to do. The rest of us must prepare ourselves as best we can, for the natural variations in the climate that are to come.
Since the IPCC has not had a large staff, but has based its activity on the efforts of scientists and other staff from all over the world, through voluntary efforts, it is left to the UN member states to ensure a suitable and appropriate winding up of the Climate Panel for these people.
Warmer and colder than now!
For a long time, it has been pointed out that there have been both warmer and colder periods in the past. We are talking about the Little Ice Age and the warm period in the Middle Ages (1000 – 1350). One way to utilize the investigative expertise and perhaps especially the sense of loyalty that international institutions have shown towards decision-making authorities and global panels is to discuss the establishment of a vulnerability council. This could assist those countries and geographical areas that experience weather situations that they find difficult to handle on their own. However, such a council might be too small for the whole world.
An updated website!
But in any case, before the institution is eventually closed down, they will review their website, correct the ambiguities and misunderstandings that are there. They will create a website that openly and honestly conveys the view that the IPCC has today, on the climate change we see. One factor of particular importance is to remove the sustainable UN goal no. 13: «Stop
An open close-down
According to the sources, there has been a heated debate about whether to mention the topics where the debate has been particularly hot throughout the 35 years that have passed since its establishment in 1988. We are aware that considerable pressure is being put on the IPCC to specifically mention some climate issues. It is understandable that many have objections to this. But here the management of the climate panel is clear: this review should be tolerated by the staff, and especially the scientists who have contributed to the various main positions.
Special hot topics!
From what we have experienced, it is these topics, among others, that will receive a thorough discussion and explanation from the management of the climate panel. They hope that this will help to create reconciliation between the responsible climate scientists within the IPCC and the academics who have suffered the greatest burdens. Those are the burdens from the erroneous activities that the climate panel and its assisting climate scientists have been responsible for.
No financial compensation will be given for the almost useless work that thousands of scientists have done in the period from 1988 to the present.
The list of hot topics
Here is a list of the selected topics that the climate panel believes require an open review:
- The last message from EPA: The Endangerment is over, no more GW fear.
- The countries outside the Paris Agreement
- Only 15 UN countries have responded with new climate goals
- NOAA is cheating with the data
- The Met Office has a lot of cheating affairs
- The weather stations are old and not well taken care of
- The Nobel Fraud
- The CO2 emission has almost no effect on the temperature
- NASA is reorganised
- IPCC has lost parts of the working force from the US
- 44 experts stopped the cooperation with IPCC
- The Mauno Loa has reduced the activity, due to Trump’s decisions
For those who are uncertain, the climate story may end in this way. When does the message appear?