(John Shanahan) USofA - A good nuclear power program for the world

Page 1

A good nuclear power program for the world John Shanahan September 2, 2020 1) STRONG NUCLEAR POWER LOBBYING: Nuclear power doesn't have an effective lobbying process to make sure elected officials and the media understand nuclear's benefits and to prevent anti-nuclear organizations having far too much influence in important decision making and public education. This happens in North America, Europe, South Africa, India and Japan where there is plenty of scientific and technical leadership. Some reasons are lack of money for lobbying and lack of willingness of nuclear utilities to stick their necks out and speak the truth for fear of reprisal by regulators and anti-nuclear activists. 2) CONTROL ANTI-NUCLEAR: Anti-nuclear leaders of government (Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Democrats in Congress and Democrat candidates for public office in 2020) and their anti-nuclear advisors (Frank von Hippel, Thomas Cochran, John Holdren, Natural Resources Defense Council, Greenpeace, The Sierra Club, etc.) have all but stopped the nuclear industry in the United States. There is no plan to continue nuclear power on the scale it has been in the United States even for one more generation, much less for hundreds of years. Anti-nuclear power individuals and organizations must be effectively neutralized. 3): LWR NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY: The current Lightwater Reactor nuclear power technology has been a real success: safe, good management, good operation, good maintenance. But it can not and must not be the sole source of nuclear power for the future. This technology uses less than 1% of the nuclear energy in the uranium ore that comes out of the ground. The rest remains in the used fuel and depleted uranium, which American leadership fools want to put back in the ground at tremendous expense. Less than 2% of the original ore needs to be managed as hazardous nuclear waste, if we allow used fuel to be reprocessed and fissioned in fast neutron reactors. And that hazardous nuclear waste requires storage for less than 500 years, not millions of years. And that hazardous nuclear waste can be stored in simple, inexpensive surface or near surface storage facilities, not in expensive facilities thousands of feet underground. The French nuclear program is doing this. It is an outstanding success. The American nuclear waste program is in shambles as the 2010 Blue Ribbon Committee clearly determined. The American (and thus the world) nuclear waste program is a disgrace, totally because of anti-nuclear activists and their do-nothing partners in public office. 3) ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES: We must use advanced nuclear power technologies that are already well tested to access all the nuclear energy in uranium and thorium. The U.S. government and Nuclear Regulatory Commission has blocked all this. There is enough energy in all the retrievable uranium and thorium to meet all the world's energy needs for as long as humans live on Earth - several billion 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.