(Rob Jeffrey) South Africa - Weaknesses of Solar and Wind, Myths and Questions

Page 1

Weaknesses of solar and wind - Myths and Questions that require an answer Rob Jeffrey June 5, 2020

It is claimed that wind and solar are the cheapest sources of electricity and these sources should dominate the future electricity supply. This paper focuses on known additional costs and subsidies which are not taken into account in the costs of wind and solar put forward by their advocates. Advocates of wind and solar claim a cost of 62cents/kWh. This is, however, the price at the gate of the supplier. It does not include all the costs of supply necessary to convert this electricity from non-dispatchable electricity supply at the gate to dispatchable electricity supply at the point of supply to the customer. These are in effect direct subsidies to solar and wind suppliers, whereas they should be added as a cost to the renewable energy suppliers Renewables, such as hydro, biomass and thermal, have different qualities and are not considered in this paper. In any event, hydro and thermal are not options as they are not available in quantity domestically in South Africa. Gas is another fossil fuel which at this stage is not found in significant economic amounts in South Africa. The critical issues are that solar and wind have very low load factors and are variable intermittent and unpredictable. In other words, they are not dispatchable. In the case of wind, the load factor is an average of 35% or less and solar 26% or less. Their supply is weather dependent, and therefore backup must be available at 100% of the time 24/7. Coal has a load factor on average of approximately 80% and nuclear an average of 90%. Their load factors are affected by predictable maintenance requirements and generally to a lesser extent by unpredictable repair requirements. A reserve margin (or backup) of 20% has traditionally been considered sufficient to cover for both these events. Methodologies and more realistic estimates of the real costs of solar and wind, including back up, can be calculated using A simple approach using the load factor alone. This gives the cost of wind at R1.77/kWh and the cost of solar at R2.38/kWh. These costs must be compared to a coal cost of R1.31/kWh and nuclear at R1.44/kWh. More complex methodologies taking risk and uncertainty of outages into account and using variance or standard deviation as the estimate of risk put the costs of wind at R2.52/kWh, solar at R3.83, coal R1.10/kWh and nuclear R1.33/kWh. To the claimed costs of 62cents/kWh for solar and wind the additional costs that should be added include the items that follow in this list. Additional grid costs: Not only do transmission lines have to be built, but they will only be used less than 35% of the time. This low usage suggests that at minimum grid 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.