Link: http://diekaltesonne.de/der-niedergang-der-seriosen-wissenschaft-bedeutetauch-das-ende-unserer-industriegesellschaft/ Please see link above to original text in German, embedded hotlinks and comments.
The decline of serious science also means the end of our industrial society 4. May 2019 By Uli Weber Today publicly supported good people believe in all sorts of national and international political or scientific committees of the western industrialized nations that digital money has always been there and only needs to be printed out by a fully electric self-driving central bank in order to be able to give it away with full hands. Both the belief in a selfinflating abundance of economic resources and its ritual sacrifice for a higher purpose herald an era of anti-caliphation in the western industrialized nations. Such a pattern of behavior parallels religiously founded skydives of Stone Age populations, as they have become known, for example, with the ritual-ruinous gift giving on the north-western Pacific coast of North America ( Potlatch ) or an automated worldview in New Guinea ( Cargo cult ). From 2020, western industrialized nations will spend $ 100 billion a year to the rest of the world, hoping to secure their own living standards through "renewable" energy, a "turnaround", and a "agricultural turnaround" without fossil fuels so as to soothe the global climate. Both are composedthe modern cult of global decarbonization up to the year 2100 as an inexhaustible cargoistic potlatch of giving and taking out of nothing - and also the fullyassimilated sciences are at the service of this good cause ... Kaltsunonne has just had a recent work by Zemp et al. (2019) reported glacier shrinkage and sea-level rise, in which the authors had danced the emotional experience in the abstract, their conclusions suggesting that glacier shrinkage could be greater than previously reported. Apparently in this work the attempt is made to support a sociopolitical ideology with scientific mimicry. But perhaps you should be much more empathic with such climate alchemists, because they wanted to support only one good cause , and in the end they found that their results proved the opposite. And there may be quite different reasons for such scientific misconduct. For example, it makes sense to take a closer look at the so-called science sponsorship. Because at a time when borrowing is an essential task of institutional science, new "science-political" dependencies may result. On the website of the "Department of Geography" of the University of Zurich you will find under "Featured papers" a message " Melting Glaciers " of April 9, 2019 about the ominous study by Zemp et al. (2019), in which also supporting organizations are named, quote: 1