What is climate actually? (Uli Weber)

Link: http://www.kaltesonne.de/was-ist-eigentlich-klima/ Please see the link above for original in German with hotlinks. This is a computer generated translation from German to English with some hotlinks.

What is climate, actually?

19 July 2017

By Uli Weber Computer-assisted climate projections warn us of a dangerous human-made climate change and therefore a global decarbonization agreed upon in the Climate Treaty of Paris should save mankind from a very bad climate. And before the end of the day, everyone wants to know about nothing and, of course, they have not been part of it, the question is actually what the terms "climate" and "forecasts" really mean; Paris is hopefully self-explanatory. This begins with "climate" quite easily, because climate is by definition the 30-year statistical average weather. This is easily comprehensible for everyone, and for every woman and anybody, too, of course, if he-she is more than 30 years old. So look back, what has changed in the past 30 years?

In the past, everything was much better, so the climate has gotten clearly worse.

Where?

Of course here at home, so somewhere in EEG-Nimmerland. (Erneuerbare-EnergienGesetz, The German Renewable Energy Sources Act for German Never Never Land, an imaginary utopian place) Now this climate alarming is not about our own land, because we must finally save the whole world by means of a global decarbonization. The climate has obviously also become worse everywhere in this world, that is, the ominous world climate. This world climate, what is really "the world climate"?

The world climate is logically by definition the statistical mean of 30 years "worldwide".

And what is now world-wide?

This is very different. Even the travel weather report for Europe can show quite large temperature differences. But that is still nothing against the difference between the northern and southern hemisphere of our planet. Because when here in the northern hemisphere is winter, then in the southern hemisphere is summer.

So what is the statistical mean for a world-wide winter and summer?

Page 1

This is quite clear, autumn or spring. And the statistical mean of spring and autumn is then autumn spring. Thus, the world is the best in spring. And the 30-year-old statistical mean of this world-wide-autumn-spring-weather is then the world climate.

So far we have already abstracted roughly twice, once over both hemispheres of our earth and the second time over 30 years. However, we have not encountered the real existing natural climatic vegetation zones, but an artificial average construction in degrees Celsius. But what has this "world climate" in degrees Celsius to do with the weather here in our EEG-Nimmerland?

Actually, nothing more!

And where on our beautiful world can one experience this ominous "world climate"?

Never in this world, but only in the apocalyptic prophecies of climate alarmists.

These climate alarmists will then calculate the world-wide-autumn- spring-weather for tens of thousands of years with their sinfully expensive supercomputers, and thus suggest a man-made shift of the next ice age by 100,000 years. This is really terrible, just imagine: no energy saving igloos, no glaciers in the garden and no dog sleds in public transport for the next 100,000 years ...

In these prophecies, however, there is a very small point: the fact is that the data base for such calculations has been "improved" by a sort of Lotto machine in order to conjure up the climatic contribution of Paris and the decarbonisation of the world. Such temperature data sets are "cultivated" by a few important (not "not very important") environmental perceptions such as NOAA and made available to the climate audiences around the world for their calculations.

And by coincidence, pre-eminently before the Paris climate summit, such prophecies fell over with terrible consequences of a man-made catastrophe for the "climate" of our earth. And today, this computer program and precisely this data base with the underlying "improved" historical temperature data can no longer be found. This is, of course, pure coincidence, an active obscuration would be a very malicious submission of so-called "Climate Change Deniers".

For what can the responsible scientists at NOAA already, if the Supercomputer simply "under the hands" of them, of course, inclusive of all programs and all data? Volkswagen could finally have thought about it in time, but in the economy there should even be some phobics, which "mirror" whole data centers, in order to secure important construction and customer data - but the climate religion is of course not necessary. In addition, these climatic data are now safe from Trumps access, which is supposed to be a confessional "climate alien", and therefore already spreads fear and terror in the global climate.

After all, the global climate church is claiming to have a world-wide coercive global transformation called a "decarbonization", a humanitarian climate catastrophe, to Page 2

provide a "carbon-free" society, for thousands of poor ‌ And such a thing is much more believable without data anyway.

But it is like in the real life of all social and religious "world-improving" field trials, there are always these disbelieving counterrevolutionaries, who simply stand in the way of every social progress of mankind. Such eternal "climatic climbers" are finally responsible for the fact that there is still no more beautiful new decarbonized world: They believe in unchecked technological progress - and they doubt that EEG electricity can be stored in the quantity required for a secure power supply.

"Climate Change Deniers" do not even believe in nature and environmental protection - and are constantly criticizing the destruction of the landscape by wind power plants, solar parks and corn-monoculturations for biogas plants.

In so doing, they have nothing at all to do with resource conservation - they constantly complain about the fact that we are making two complete power generation systems, a subsidized "renewable" EEG power plant and conventional power plants that we can not switch off , And finally, these "climatologists" do not even interfere with the economic injustice in this world - always point out that in the "Energy Transition" the poor have to pay the guaranteed profits of the rich EEG profiteers.

It is unbelievable what these people simply conclude when the factual situation is quite clear and 97 per cent of all scientists, economic representatives, politicians, clerics, esoterics and fortune-tellers believe in the human-made climate catastrophe generated by computer-assisted climate prostheses. At this point it is difficult to find the curve to a suitable conclusion. Just believe what you want, but do not believe you can prove it ‌.

Page 3

Page 4