Link: https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/global-warming-in-2010-theheat-came-from-politics-not-mother-nature Please see link above for source text, embedded hotlinks, and comments.
Global Warming in 2010: The Heat Came from Politics, Not Mother Nature January 3, 2011 By Roger Cohen It’s time to review the year’s happenings in the hurly-burly world of global warming. But before we go further, readers should know that global warming has morphed again. Dissatisfied with the earlier attempt to replace “global warming” with the ho-hummer “climate change,” Presidential Science Advisor John Holdren has relabeled it “climate disruption.” The switch better enables claims that any nasty weather event can be ascribed to driving your SUV. El Niño Reappears The year 2010 will come in slightly warmer than recent norms, insignificantly different from the peak year of 1998. Advocates of climate alarmism will crow accordingly, just as skeptics crowed over the unusually cold 2008. Both are meaningless: 2010 brought a strongly warming El Niño event, whereas 2008 had a strongly cooling La Niña. These are natural cycles, and the trend over the last 10 to 15 years remains flat. But get ready for loud squawks from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration about a hot year. Skeptics’ Ranks Augmented Nevertheless, the year was dominated by human events, not science. Some of it was dramatic. Preeminent Georgia Tech climatologist Judith Curry “defected” from the dogma and became a vocal critic of the IPCC and ardent spokesperson for science accountability. Then my friend and colleague in physics, Hal Lewis, became an instant folk hero when he issued his public letter resigning from the American Physical Society. Hal was chairman of the Defense Science Board Panel on Nuclear Winter and chaired the APS Reactor Safety Study. The letter contained scathing indictments of the bogus science and moneyed interests driving the politics.
1