PROGRAMME OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 08:30 08:45 10:15 10:30 12:00 12:45 14:15 14:30 16:00
Opening of the General Assembly Motion for a Resolution by the Committee Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs II Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs I Coffee break Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Culture and Education Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs II Lunch break Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety I Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs I Coffee break Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Legal Affairs Motion for a Resolution by the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety II Closing Ceremony
PROCEDURE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY GENERAL RULES The wish to speak is indicated by raising the Committee placard. Each committee may use only one Committee placard. The authority of the Board is absolute.
PROCEDURE AND TIME SETTINGS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Presenting of the Motion for a Resolution Presenting of the Friendly Amendments Reading of the Operative Clauses Three minutes to defend the Motion for a Resolution Three minutes to attack the Motion for a Resolution One minute to respond to the Attack Speech Open Debate Three minutes to sum up the debate Voting procedure Announcing the votes
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT A last-minute modification to the Motion for a Resolution by the Proposing Committee. Amendments are to be handed in to the Board at least two Resolutions before the Resolution in question, or as soon as possible for the first Resolutions of the General Assembly.
POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE Request for a Delegate to repeat a point that was inaudible. Failure to understand the language being spoken does not make for a Point of Personal Privilege.
DIRECT RESPONSE Once per debate, each Committee may use the Direct Response sign. Should a Delegate raise the sign during the open debate, he/she will immediately be recognised by the Board and given the floor as soon as the point being made is concluded. A Direct Response can only be used to refer to and discuss the point made directly beforehand. If two or more Direct Responses are requested at once, the Board will decide which Committee to recognise. In this case, the second Direct Response shall only be held if it can be referred to the first Direct Response, so on and so forth.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
POINT OF ORDER These can be raised by the Chairperson if a Delegate feels the Board have not properly followed parliamentary procedure. Ultimately, the authority of the Board is absolute.
DEFENCE SPEECH One member of the Proposing Committee delivers the Defence Speech from the podium. It is used to explain the rationale of the overall lines of the Resolution and convince the Plenary that the Resolution is worthy of being adopted. This speech can last a maximum of three minutes.
ATTACK SPEECH An individual Delegate from a Committee other than that proposing the Resolution at hand delivers an Attack Speech from the podium. It reflects an individual opinion and is used to point out the flaws of the approach taken by the Proposing Committee and should propose alternative solutions. This speech can last a maximum of three minutes.
SUMMATION SPEECH One or two members of the Proposing Committee deliver the Summation Speech from the podium; the microphone can only be passed once. It is used to summarise the debate, respond to main, selected criticism and to once more explain why the chosen approach is the most sensible. This speech can last a maximum of three minutes.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS II Freedom of religion and the limits of multiculturalism: In an increasingly multicultural Europe, to what extent should governments respect religious values, attitudes and traditions in order to ensure the integration of minorities and cohesion of European societies? Submitted by:
Kateřina BARTAKOVIČOVÁ (CZ), Eliška SEDLÁŘOVÁ (CZ), Kateřina HARENČÁKOVÁ (CZ), Anežka KREJČOVÁ (CZ), Petr SOVADINA (CZ), Matyáš UVÍRA (CZ), Tomáš KOVÁŘÍK (CZ), Sára ŠAŠKOVÁ (CZ), Aleksander ŚWIĄTEK (PL), Vanessa LAGRANGE (Chairperson, CZ), Valeria YUDINA (Chairperson, UA).
The European Youth Parliament, A. Perturbed by the constantly growing number of victims of online sexual extortion; B. Deeply disturbed by the lack of awareness about the risks related to uploading personal data such as intimate photos, C. Concerned by the absence of a common online extortion policy amongst Member States, D. Recognizing the insufficient sanctions for sex offenders, E. Alarmed that the majority of perpetrators of sexual extortion is underage, F. Aware that the sensitivity of the topic of sexual extortion makes it complicated for victims to report this crime and get psychological support, G. Deeply concerned that tracing perpetrators of online extortion is difficult;
1.
2. 3. 4.
5.
Requests the EU Member States to increase awareness of online sexual extortion through a media campaign informing about its prevention and its consequences as agreed upon in the Council of Europe Convention of Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse, Invites the European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) 1 to create a lecture programme informing citizens about basic facts, punishments and availability of professional help regarding online sexual extortion; Further invites the EC3 to cooperate with educational institutions and organisations in the creation of the abovementioned lecture programme; Urges the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA), the European Police Office (EUROPOL) and the Member States to make the number of sexual offenders within the European Union public by publishing it on official websites of EU institutions; Further urges ENISA and EUROPOL to improve the exchange of sexual offenders’ data amongst Member States by adding information about third country nationals, who are threatening European citizens to the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS);
The European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) is the body of Europol that coordinates cross-border law enforcement activities against computer crime and acts as a centre of technical expertise on the matter. 1
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
6. 7.
Encourages the European Commission to propose a common policy regarding the definition of online sexual extortion and the punishments to be imposed; Expresses its hope that NGOs will promote national hotlines for the victims of online sexual extortion by using their public channels.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS I Internships: An opportunity or a form of exploitation? As large numbers of young people enrol in unpaid and unregulated internships and traineeships in order to gain access to professional work in their domestic job markets, how can the EU protect the rights of interns whilst ensuring a high-quality learning experience from these programs? Submitted by:
Ondřej ALTMAN (CZ), Johana GOMBÍKOVÁ (CZ), Saikal IDINOVA (CZ), Stephanie KASHI (CZ), Iza LEWIŃSKA (PL), Adam PALIVEC (CZ), Markéta STUCHLÍKOVÁ (CZ), David ŠOUREK (CZ), Jan ŠTĚBRA (CZ), Prokop ŠVÁBÍK (CZ), Daniela ŠEVČÍKOVÁ (CZ), Zuzanna NOWAK (Chairperson, PL), Patrik HOUZAR (Chairperson, CZ).
The European Youth Parliament, A. B. C. D. E. F.
Acknowledging that unpaid internships do not lead to the growth of employment opportunities, Deeply concerned about interns’ rights being violated by employers, Recognising the lack of a clear legal definition of an intern’s position, Recognising lack of legislation concerning internship programmes amongst Member States, Fully aware that the expectations of the interns are not being fulfilled, Emphasising that unpaid internships make it difficult for young people to afford to meet their needs;
1.
Calls upon the European Commission to create a network by establishing an NGO that would: a) enable interns to review their internships in order to ensure a high-quality environment where opportunities for personal development are met, b) create a database and statistics based on the reported satisfaction levels of interns resulting in a common ranking system of internships between Member States;
2. Encourages Member States to adopt legal policies forcing companies with internship programmes to clarify the tasks and responsibilities in binding contracts; 3. Urges the European Commission to create common guidelines on providing legal support for interns in case of contract violations; 4. Recommends that Member States establish legal definitions of terms such as internship, traineeship, intern, and trainee in order to protect the rights of interns; 5. Further recommends establishing a European Internship Quality Certificate to distinguish companies that reach internationally established criteria based on the opinions of unbiased control bodies; 6. Requests that the European Social Fund provides transfer payments to financially disadvantaged prospective interns to ensure that they can cover their living expenses.
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION In the light of the main objectives set by the European Agenda for Culture, how can the EU support museums, art and other forms of culture in contributing to European Society? Submitted by:
Miroslav BUDINSKÝ (CZ), Daniel DVOŘÁČEK (CZ), Michaela HUJOVÁ (SK), Tomáš JIROUSEK (CZ), Nikola KOUBOVÁ (CZ), Michael KOZÁK (CZ), Tereza KUBÍKOVÁ (CZ), Vanja TRIPALO (CZ), Ondřej ŠIL (CZ), Valerie VÍTKOVÁ (CZ), Mahaut ESTIER (Chairperson, CH), Aurel Daniel GAUTSCHI (Chairperson, CH).
The European Youth Parliament, A. Deeply disappointed that some forms of culture, such as but not limited to museums, theatre and literature, have lost their prestige, B. Alarmed by the loss of national cultural identity due to dominance of certain culture connected to major political power, C. Deeply regretting that cultural education is undervalued, insufficiently accessible and not attractive enough for youth, D. Noting with regret that art departments in schools are underfinanced in comparison to scientific or technical departments, E. Observing that many cultural professions are considered to be hobbies rather than respectable professions, F. Disappointed by the lack of promotion of cultural projects, G. Expressing its appreciation of cultural events aimed at connecting local artists; H. Taking into account that digital art is gradually becoming more popular; I. Confident that culture which is well represented and preserved not only has aesthetic value but also creates jobs and supports the economy through tourism;
1.
Encourages the Network of European Museum Organisations (NEMO)2 to train people working in the cultural sector on how to raise public interest and public involvement in cultural institutions;
2.
Requests the ministry of finance of each Member States to establish a tax exemption for publishers who produce local contemporary art;
3.
Recommends Member States to promote and financially support free educational projects in collaboration with cultural institutions such as museums;
4.
Further recommends the ministry of education of each Member State to adjust school curriculum to include: a) cultural subjects taught interactively using modern teaching technologies, b) the aforementioned educational projects;
The Network of European Museum Organisations (NEMO) is an independent network of national museum organisations whose goal is to connect European museums and their organisations to help to ensure their place in the cultural development of Europe. 2
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
5.
Supports Members States in their efforts to organise cultural events where local artists can meet and display their art;
6.
Calls upon the European Commission to coordinate the creation of a digital application to connect local artists.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS II The rise of the creative class: In the light of the social friction related to gentrification and the stimulation of this process by local governments, what stance should the EU take regarding this form of urban development? Submitted by:
Petr CHALUPSKÝ (CZ), Natálie KMOŠKOVÁ (CZ), Petr KRÁL (CZ), Jakub RECH (CZ), Petra SEDLÁKOVÁ (CZ), Alexandr SUSIČ (CZ), Isabella Mikos THARP (CZ), Amandine TRUONG (FR), Merkéta UHLÍKOVÁ (CZ), Júlia GONOVÁ (Chairperson, SK), Isidora ŠMIGIĆ (Chairperson, RS).
The European Youth Parliament, A.
Recognising that the process of gentrification3, while increasing economic activity, also results in social tensions between pre-gentrification residents and the residents that have outcompeted them, B. Alarmed by the number of local residents displaced because of the increased financial pressure put upon them as a result of the changes in the housing market and local economy caused by gentrification, C. Concerned by the negative impacts on suburban life that the displacement of a large number of people from urban areas causes, which include: i) fewer job and educational opportunities, ii) an increased crime rate, iii) reduced mental and physical health, D. Noting with regret the lack of legislation protecting the economically vulnerable from displacement, E. Taking into consideration that local governments often support gentrification, because it helps cities to develop economically and generates significant tax income, F. Approving of the increased economic activity that gentrification results in as tourists and economically independent citizens are attracted to the newly gentrified areas.
1. 2.
Calls upon the European Commission to replace the term “urban challenges” that was used in the Europe 2020 strategy with4 “urban development” in future long-term strategies; Encourages the European Commission to support the municipalities of Member States by providing the legal framework necessary for inclusionary zoning5;
Gentrification is the process of renewal and rebuilding which accompanies the arrival of middle-class or wealthy people into deteriorating areas. 4 Europe 2020 is a 10-year strategy proposed by the European Commission on 3 March 2010 for advancement of the economy of the European Union. It aims at "smart, sustainable, inclusive growth" with greater coordination of national and European policy. 5 Inclusionary zoning is an affordable housing tool that either requires or encourages new residential developments to make a certain percentage of the housing units affordable to low- or moderate- income residents. 3
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
3.
4. 5. 7.
Recommends that regulations on the improvement of living conditions in existing social housing6 units are introduced in Member States to ensure that residents: a) have access to different job opportunities, b) are incorporated into the city area, c) are financially supported by the municipalities and governments of the Member States; Encourages the European Commission to continue implementing projects under the European Social Fund7 that protect vulnerable groups, particularly those affected by gentrification; Further encourages the European Commission to increase the percentage of the European Social Fund that is available to these vulnerable groups; Urges Member States to provide tax reductions for companies that employ people negatively affected by gentrification.
Social housing is the housing provided for people on low incomes or with particular needs by governmental agencies or non-profit organisations. 7 The European Social Fund is the European Union's main financial instrument for supporting employment in the Member States of the European Union as well as promoting economic and social cohesion. 6
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY I With the upcoming ECO2017 conference dealing with the problem of obesity, how should the EU approach and tackle the issue of hazardous weight gain among its citizens? Submitted by:
Erik BANIČ (CZ), Patrik BOUČEK (CZ), Martin HADERKA Stanislav HODEČEK (CZ), Marketa LAPČÍKOVÁ (CZ), Filip MALÝ Filip MAUER (CZ), Žaneta MÍŠKOVÁ (CZ), Martina NGUYEN Martin ŠIMÁK (CZ), Tomáš VAJCÍK (CZ), Marcelina MIERZWA (Chairperson, Tom SUELMANN (Chairperson, NL).
(CZ), (CZ), (CZ), PL),
The European Youth Parliament, A. Disappointed by the fact that one in every five European citizens has some form of obesity, B. Deeply disturbed that obesity constitutes a risk factor of non-communicative diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes and several mental disorders, C. Fully alarmed that one of the main factors of childhood obesity is parent intervention, D. Bearing in mind that the low price of unhealthy food forces low income families to go for the unhealthy option, E. Noting with regret that the effective marketing of unhealthy foods makes it difficult for consumers to have a balanced diet, F. Realising that understanding food labelling systems can be crucial for composing a desirable diet, G. Deeply concerned by the food industry’s efforts to lobby the EU legislation process, H. Deeply discouraged by the lack of physical activity of European citizens, caused by: i. the high price of sports activities, ii. our distracting proximity to technology, I.
Noting with deep concern that factors such as increased stress levels, reduced physical activity, and fewer hours of sleep all contribute to weight gain,
1.
Calls upon the European Commission to introduce a media campaign that would aim to: a) promote a healthy lifestyle, b) educate people on the importance of using food labelling, c) raise awareness of obesity and the associated diseases among citizens;
8
2.
Requests that the European Commission encourages European food producers to use artificial sweeteners such as stevia instead of sugar in order to preserve product quality without deteriorating profits;
3.
Recommends that Member States introduce excise8 taxes on food based on their level of sugar, saturated fats and trans fatty acids.
An excise is an internal tax or duty, increasing the price for customers.
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
4.
Further invites Member States to financially support: a) sport clubs, associations and organisations to make them more attractive for potential customers, b) the creation of environments that encourage physical activity such as playgrounds, cycling paths, and sports fields. c) the creation of a programme aiming to make sports equipment available for low income families by either borrowing or purchasing them at schools for low prices.
5. Encourages educational institutions in the EU to provide their students with more opportunities for physical exercise.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS I Freedom of religion and the limits of multiculturalism: In an increasingly multicultural Europe, to what extent should governments respect religious values, attitudes and traditions in order to ensure the integration of minorities and cohesion of European societies? Submitted by:
Matouš BALOUN (CZ), Veronika BLAŽKOVÁ (CZ), Laura FELCMANOVÁ (CZ), Albina GANZHA (UA), Martin KRAUS KENT (CZ), Vojtěch SŮVA (CZ), Vojtěch TRDLICA (CZ), Hana VICHERKOVÁ (CZ), Marek VYBÍRAL (CZ), Tomáš ŘIHÁNEK (CZ), Pericles PETRIDES (Chairperson, GR), Ayla ŞENTÜRK (Chairperson, TR).
The European Youth Parliament, A.
Fully aware of the lack of knowledge and education about different religious practices that causes discrimination based on religion or belief, B. Deeply concerned that some religious practices such as but not limited to lapidation are in conflict with the Law of Member States, with article 10 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and with article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights9, C. Expressing its appreciation to The Employment Equality Directive10, D. Concerned about the fact that discrimination exists in public institutions, E. Fully aware that religion is sometimes used to justify hatred and oppression against others due to religious differences, F. Disappointed by the fact that numerous religious communities cannot obtain legal status which impairs their ability to manifest religion, 1.
2. 3. 4.
Recommends that the European Commission raises awareness on religious discrimination in Member States by: a) emphasising the importance of protection against discrimination based on religion and belief, b) providing educational programmes on freedom of religion and belief given by able professionals, c) supporting intercultural exchange programmes and workshops; Encourages each Member State to raise funds for institutions combatting discrimination; Invites Member States to promote the work of currently existing initiatives such as OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)11; Calls upon the European Commission to create an EU department on religious discrimination in each Member State;
Article 10 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights: freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. 10 The Employment Equality Directive: An EU Directive demanding all Member States to protect citizens against discrimination on grounds of religion and belief in employment, occupation, and vocational training. 11 OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR): Office focused on serving Member States, religious or belief communities, and civil society in protecting and promoting the right for freedom of religion or belief as well as preventing and responding to religious intolerance. 9
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
5. 6.
Further recommends Member States to commit to practicing the rule of law in criminal cases regardless of a perpetrator’s connection to any religion or belief; Expresses its hope for the European Commission to support legal recognition of all minority religions to ensure that they are protected under the law.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS In the light of the European Commission combatting geoblocking as one of the main obstructions of the digital single market, how should the EU work towards the harmonisation of online copyright laws amongst its Member States? Submitted by:
Jakub HAMPL (CZ), Adam HOOPER (CZ), Lucie Michaela HRDINOVÁ (CZ), Matyáš JELÍNEK (CZ), Viktor KARLÍČEK (CZ), Alexandra MATOUŠOVÁ (CZ), Antonín MEISSNER (CZ), Viet Tiep NGUYEN (CZ), Agnese REKŠŅA (LV), Barbora ŠANDOVÁ (CZ), Martin VESELÝ (CZ), Hoang NGUYEN (Chairperson, CZ), Sterre VAN CAMPEN (Chairperson, NL).
The European Youth Parliament, A. B.
C. D. E. F. G.
Recognising that the implementation of the ten directives from the European Commission on copyright legislation into Member States’ legislature does not match the speed of current technological developments, Keeping in mind that censorship based on geographical location: i. leads to price discrimination for various online media content, ii. discourages authors from distributing their content to other countries; Alarmed by the significant differences in Member States’ legislature regarding copyright law, which could lead to confusion about which jurisdiction is applicable may lead to companies unintentionally providing products illegally, Deeply concerned that the growth of economies can be hindered due to fragmented legislation in Member States, Declaring that the copyright protection term no longer suits the needs of society and should therefore be amended,
H. Further noting that implementing the Digital Single Market 12would improve social welfare and help market development; 1. 2. 3.
Urges the European Commission to create a framework for harmonising copyright laws in all Member States to tackle the existing issue of geoblocking; Suggests that the European Commission supports the creation of a platform dedicated to describing the legal copyright framework to its users with the aim that this framework is fully understood; Calls upon the European Commission to clarify the conditions in which the country of origin principle is applicable as opposed to the country of reception principle;
The Digital Single Market is an initiative by the European Commission to ensure the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital. The aim is for citizens and businesses to seamlessly and fairly access online goods and services regardless of their geographical location. 12
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
4.
5.
Emphasises the need for the European Commission to encourage the implementation of the Digital Single Market in order to: a. improve social welfare b. ensure steady market development; Calls upon the Member States to implement existing legislation which enables educational institutions to use materials protected by copyright laws for research and teaching.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION BY THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY II A healthy mind in a healthy body: As the number of Europeans suffering from mental health issues keeps rising, how can the EU ensure the availability of proper medical care and a societal acceptance of citizens affected by mental illnesses? Submitted by:
Michael BUJNIEWICZ UPPAL (PL), Kateřina HRABÁNKOVÁ (CZ), Veronika HUŽVÁROVÁ (CZ), Magda KŘIŠŤANOVÁ (CZ), Pavla MIKULCOVÁ (CZ), Anežka MLÍČKOVÁ (CZ), Martin OSOWSKI (CZ), Anna RYŠÁNKOVÁ (CZ), Martin ŠENOVSKÝ (CZ), Natálie ŠILHAVÁ (CZ), Barbora SOUKUPOVÁ (CZ), Vojtěch TROCHTA (CZ), Michal KYTNAR (Chairperson, CZ), Matthias SCHWERTNER (Chairperson, AT).
The European Youth Parliament, A. Disappointed by the lack of knowledge about and understanding of mental health issues in the society, B. Perturbed by poor availability of sufficient medical treatment of mental health issues, especially regarding the personal approach towards the patients, C. Realising that self-stigma attached to mental health issues can lead to e.g. social exclusion, worsening of the conditions, D. Alarmed by social exclusion of people with mental health issues which can lead to patients denying their illness, refusing help, developing self-stigmatising behaviour and isolating themselves, E. Taking into account that the EU cannot create or implement a standardised approach on medical treatment for all EU countries because of differences such as cultural background, different policies and economic stability, F. Noting with deep concern that according to a WHO study, 27% equalling approximately 83 million citizens of the EU, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland aged 18-65 have experienced mental health issues, with the number rising further, G. Deeply disturbed that mental health issues are the second leading cause of death amongst young adults aged 15–29;
1.
Requests the European Commission to improve their cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding the availability and quality of medical treatment for patients suffering from mental health issues;
2.
Invites the European Commission to support the creation of additional internships for psychology students, medical students, and others in order to: a)
improve the availability of medical treatment for patients suffering from mental health issues,
b)
give psychology students a better insight on how to improve their practical skills, especially regarding the personal approach to the patients;
3.
Recommends Member States to include mental health issues in their First Aid curricula;
4.
Further recommends Member States to expand school curricula by courses on mental health issues;
5.
Expresses its hope that Member States will raise awareness about mental health issues through mass media as well as paid advertisements in private media;
11 December 2016, Hradec Králové
6.
Urges Member States to create more employment opportunities for people suffering from mental health issues by supporting businesses specialising on employing them in order to increase their social acceptance;
7.
Encourages Member States to continue their cooperation when combatting problems related to mental health.
11 December 2016, Hradec KrĂĄlovĂŠ
PARTNERS OF THE REGIONAL SELECTION CONFERENCE HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ 2016:
REGIONAL SELECTION CONFERENCE HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ 2016 IS AN EVENT ORGANISED BY THE EUROPEAN YOUTH PARLIAMENT CZECH REPUBLIC