Portfolio_Jacqueline Lau

PORTFOLIO

Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin

CONTENT

\UNDERGRADUATE Aerotope \POSTGRADUATE Silvertown Heartbeat: A Neighbourhood Reborn Typologies in Canary Wharf \WORK EXPERIENCE Fubon Xinyi A25 Yankuang Group HQ JiaoXi Onsen Resort

UNDERGRADUATE

08

Aerotope

Aerotope | Taipei, Taiwan

Aerotope | Taipei, Taiwan

TYPE TYPE DATE PROFESSOR DATE DESCRIPTION PROFESSOR DESCRIPTION

03

Academic (Individual work) Academic (Individual work) Year 5, Final Project (Sept, 2017~May, 2018) Galu5,Yang (archinet@ms37.hinet.net) Year Final Project An airport built in the urban center—Aerotropolis Galu Yang (archinet@ms37.hinet.net)

An airport built in the urban center—Aerotropolis Aviation has been developing for more than a century, and because of its universality, airports are now being used as a means of transportation between cities in our daily life.

Aviation been developing than a century, and because ofhave its universality, With thehas ever-increasing demandforformore transportation, environmental impacts been airports areand now being used a means ofhave transportation cities in our daily magnified examined, safetyas measurements become the between primary consideration.

Therefore, airports have gradually been built from cities and become isolated transferhave life.

With the ever-increasing demand for out transportation, environmental impacts stations. been magnified and examined, safety measurements have become the primary consideration. Therefore, airports have gradually been built out from cities and Biotope is the biological community in landscape ecology. I believe that human behaviors become isolatedurban transfer stations. and movements, functions, and nature can coexist in cities like a biological chain.

This project uses Taipei Songshan Airport as example, to create an ecosystem that incorporates the biological airport as urban infrastructure which coexists with animals andthat plantshuman Biotope is the community in landscape ecology.

I believe forming the biological community. behaviors and movements, urban functions, and nature can coexist in cities like a biological chain. This project uses Taipei Songshan Airport as example, to create an In order to achieve the integration between the airport, the city and the ecology, this design ecosystem incorporates the airport as urban coexists uses a spacethat unit to create an ecosystem and provide newinfrastructure opportunities which for airport designwith animals and plants forming the biological community. without barriers. I call this project—Aerotope.

In order to achieve the integration between the airport, the city and the ecology, this design uses a space unit to create an ecosystem and provide new opportunities for airport design without barriers. I call this project—Aerotope

Aerotope Aerotope

09 04

|| Site SiteIntroduction Introduction \Songshan district in Taipei city

Beitou

Shilin

Neihu Zhongshan Datong Wanhua

Songshan Xinyi

Zhongzheng

Nangang Daan

Wenshan

| Site Analysis | Site Analysis

\The Boundary

Green Residential area Commercials Industrial District Boundary Zone Boundary

\Urbanized and reservation areas

\Topography

\Transportation system and water ways

\Urban green space

Aerotope Aerotope Aerotope

11 12 05 || Spatial SpatialDistribution Distribution

|| Departure andand Arrival Departure Arrival Drop Off

Canyon

Check-in

Observation Security Deck Immigration Gate Lounge

Passenger Boarding Bridge

2F +14.00 1F +6.00 GF +0.00 B1F -8.00 B2F -14.00

2F +14.00 1F +6.00 GF +0.00 B1F -8.00 B2F -14.00

Lobby

Arrival Pick-up

Customs

Arrival Hall

Baggage Reclaim

Gate Passenger Lounge Boarding Bridge

2F +14.00 1F +6.00 GF +0.00 B1F -8.00 B2F -14.00

2F +14.00 1F +6.00 GF +0.00 B1F -8.00 B2F -14.00

Departure Sequence

Airport Fortcourt and Terminal Approach > Terminal Entrance and Check-in

Arrival Sequence

Arrival Gates

>

International Arrival Corridor

>

>

International Departure and Retail

>

Immigration and Baggage Reclaim

>

Domestic Departure and Retail

Arrival Pick Up

>

>

Departure Gates

Terminal Link Through Subway

Aerotope Aerotope

13 06

|| Check-in and Baggage Check-in and Baggage

Airline Office Terminal

Museum and Gallery Event Hall Retail Plaza

14 07

Aerotope Aerotope

|| Traffic Flow Traffic Flow

Subway

Subway

Check-in

Parking

Cargo Ground Handling Arrival

Terminal

Taxi Stand

Main Entrance City Bus

Drop Off

Tour Bus

Highway Bus

Retail Plaza

Pick Up

Museum

Parking Departure Arrivals

Private car

Taxi

City Bus

Highway Bus

Tour Bus

Subway

Cargo

Ground Handling

Aerotope Aerotope

15 08

|| Urban Programme UrbanGreen Green Program

\Diffuse in urban green

\Sunlight through roofing structure

\Interior green atrium structure

BOARDING BRIDGE SECTION SCALE 1:8000

LEGEND 1 Green atrium 2 Departure curbside 3 Arrival curbside 4 Lobby

5 Check-in counter 6 Concession 7 Security 8 Immigration

9 Baggage handling area 13 Baggage reclaim 10 Observation deck 14 Customs 11 Gate lounge 15 Technical room 12 Passenger boarding bridge

5 Exhibition hall #2 6 Archieves 7 Green atrium 8 Parking

9 Gate lounge 10 Passenger boarding bridge 11 Observation deck 12 Technical room

TERMINAL SECTION SCALE 1:2000

LEGEND 1 Lobby 2 VVIP room 3 Museum gallery 4 Exhibiton hall #1

MUSEUM SECTION SCALE 1:2000

16 09

Aerotope Aerotope

GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:8000

6

3

8 7

2

1 5

4

FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:8000

9

10

11

1

12

4

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

LEGEND

SCALE 1:8000

1. Terminal 2. Green atrium 3. Connector 4. Retail plaza

Atrium

5. Museum 6. Boarding bridge 7. Event hall 8. Learning hall

Terminal

9. Observation deck 10. Airline office 11. Media center 12. Exhibition hall

Drop Off

Retail Plaza

Museum and Gallery

Event Hall

Airline Office

WHOLE SECTION SCALE 1:8000

Aerotope Aerotope

17 10

Day view of the airport

Night view of the airport

POSTGRADUATE

Silvertown Heartbeat: A Neighbourhood Reborn | London, United Kingdom TYPE MODULE PROFESSOR TUTOR CONTRIBUTION

Academic (Group work) 2nd Semester, Urban Design: Design Guidance, Incentive and Control Matthew Carmona (m.carmona@ucl.ac.uk) Valentina Giordano (v.giordano@ucl.ac.uk) My most significant contribution is illustrating the cover, regulatory plan and designing the coding of the public realm section after several discussions with my fellow group members. Throughout the project we collectively considered the SWOT, forming the overall design codes after significant viewpoints from all of us.

| History and Timeline

Silvertown Heartbeat: A Neighbourhood Reborn

12

| Regulatory Plan Intro Ground Floor Regulatory Plan

Overall Concept Map 1.7

1.8

This map integrates and shows an overview of the four design concepts illustrated in section 1.6.

This design code has translated the four design concepts (refer to section 1.6 and 1.7) into the actual regulatory plan. As a technical delivery tool, this plan defines streets and blocks that serves as the structure of the development, as well as information on the building heights and land uses that could be accommodated in each zone.

Zone number Maximum storeys allowed on top of the base

C1 H=2+10

Maximum storeys allowed for nonresidential use at the base (e.g. a podium hosting commercial functions)

Upper Floor Dominant Use Regulatory Plan 1.9

This plan outlines the dominant use in the non-ground floor spaces in order to avoid confusion with the regulatory plan in section 1.8, which only shows the dominant use on the ground floor.

C: R: W: M: L:

Commercial Residential Creative Industry Mixed/ Co-location Light Industry 4

| Public Realm 4.1

4.2

Section Introduction This section outlines the parameters, including specific guidance codes for the strategy of public and open spaces on the site and responding to the industrial heritage of West Silvertown. This section explains the coding for the Tate Square, Lyle Park, pockets parks, promenade, and the wharf as a public space, as well as active and passive streets within the site. A variety of public spaces of differing atmosphere and character are envisaged for the site to support vitality and well-being.

Key Plan

Link to North Development

Linking Back to the Objectives

Link to Britannia Village

Reinforcing community character and identity by promoting a distinct sense of place This is achieved by: 4.3 4.8

Tate Square Strategy Lively Street Strategy TATE SQUARE WHARF

Supporting industries with leisure amenities and pleasant environment for long-term economic growth

LYLE PARK

This is achieved by: 4.3

Tate Square Strategy

4.7

Wharf Strategy

4.8

Lively Street Strategy Link to East Development

0m

Providing spaces for physical activity and outdoor recreation and promoting access to nature This is achieved by:

300m

Streets as Public Spaces Lively streets

4.3

Tate Square Strategy

4.4 4.5

Lyle Park Strategy Pocket Parks Strategy

Promenade

4.6 4.7

Promenade Strategy Wharf Strategy

Tranquil streets

4.8 4.9

Lively Street Strategy Tranquil Street Strategy

N

Green and Open Public Spaces Potential Pocket Parks (4.5)

Tate Square Strategy (4.3)

Wharf Strategy (4.7)

Lyle Park Strategy (4.4) 16

13

View angle of Figure 4.1 Silvertown Heartbeat: A Neighbourhood Reborn

A’ 4.3

Tate Square Strategy

A

Heights step down to intimate community spaces

Tate Square aims to become the main civic space at West Silvertown as vibrant hub with a strong sense of arrival, The historic industrial character is to be preserved at the space with the Tate and Lyle factory building as the centerpiece of the open space.

Tate

& Ly

le F

a c to

ry

Distinctive building showing area’s history

Mandatory

Green infrastructure as visual amenities

Industrial silo as central landmark

Cycling lane to promote well-being on site

The white concrete structure of the Tate & Lyle Factory must be preserved to reflect the distinctive nature of the area's history.

TATE & LYLE FACTORY

Main entrance to open directly onto space

The industrial silo/machinery currently south of the Tate & Lyle factory must be preserved and must be adaptively reused to act as a central landmark of the square. This will further bolster the square’s identity.

Adequate lighting

Main entrance to open directly onto space Eyes on the street

Tate Square must be open and visible from the DLR station which creates a sense of arrival for visitors.

Seating opportunities

Different material landscapes for wayfinding

Play on the way

Figure 4.1 – Tate Square strategy

The square must be accessible for all users, including those with disabilities. Adequate space for wheelchair users and those with mobility impairments, as well as ensuring that the surface is even and slip-resistant.

Industrial building facade serves as site’s legacy

Planting to delineate public and semi-public space

Active frontages

Adequate lighting

Guidance

Active frontages to promote local businesses

TATE & LYLE FACTORY

A portion of Tate Square should be paved with a hard surface to support local events/functions to foster a sense of community.

Landscapes that improve streetscapes

Seating for outdoor dining BUILDINGS

Seating for groups and individuals should be provided in this square to promote social interactions.

Tate Square should be attractively landscaped to improve visual amenity (e.g. with careful selection of vegetation).

A’

A Figure 4.2 – Treatment of streets around the Tate and Lyle Factory (Section A)

Hard landscapes

Cycling lane with hard landscapes

Shared path

Soft landscapes

Hard landscapes

17

4.4

Lyle Park Strategy The Lyle Park strategy is aimed to construct a central park where people congregate for recreation throughout the day.

Mandatory

4.5

Pocket Parks Strategy Pocket parks are defined as community parks exist within residential, creative industries, light industries as well as co-location. These parks are small open spaces dedicated to community engagement with specialised uses.

Guidance

The park must accommodate play and social interaction by incorporating play spaces and seating in a comfortable and safe environment.

Parking and servicing entrances to buildings must be located away from the frontages of the space to support Lyle Park’s public use.

Residential

Mandatory

The park should be well-illuminated to improve the sense of safety and ability for the space to be used at night

Guidance

Pocket park spaces must be provided on the ground level to maximise accessibility.

The park should be designed for safety and comfort with features such as adequate lighting, clear signage, and wellmaintained paths and facilities.

The spaces must be differentiated in activity types (i.e. some for exercise, others for play) to cater to different needs.

The location of the pocket park should take into considerations of noise (generated from play or other activity) on nearby residences.

The edges of the park must maximise pedestrian permeability and make access simple and easy.

Creative Industries

The park must integrate seamlessly with the promenade and form one cohesive open space.

Mandatory The space must be well landscaped and be of high visual quality to improve the local environment to attract firms to move into the area.

Incorporates both hard and soft landscaping

PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY STREET

Defensible Space

These pocket parks must be accessible to all users but respond to the needs of workers employed in creative industries.

LYLE PARK

Adequate lighting

Limited vehicular access

Guidance

The spaces should incorporate more hard surfaces to accommodate events/booths/ outdoor workshops organised by local creative industries, or as space that creative industries can ‘spill out’ onto.

Landscaping

Light Industries

Mandatory

Guidance

BUILDINGS

The pocket park space must be located in an area away from heavy industrial traffic or yard spaces to ensure they are enjoyable.

Seating

Pavement

The spaces must be designed for the needs of light industry workers.

Pedestrian and cycle path

Shared surface Soft landscapes

Pocket park spaces should improve usability (e.g. having a canopy in between light industrial buildings).

Soft landscapes

Figure 4.3 – Lyle Park strategy 18

Silvertown Heartbeat: A Neighbourhood Reborn

4.6

14

Promenade Strategy The term "promenade" refers to the area along the Thames River at our location, which serves as an eastwest connector and supports waterfront views and recreational activities. At the same time, the space is reimagined to link the use of wharf with the future development.

4.7

Wharf Strategy The wharf is envisaged as supporting light industry access needs with additional use as public space, and potential for conversion to a fully fledged public space in future. The industrial character and waterfront position are key assets that should be capitalised upon throughout this process.

Mandatory

Mandatory

A comprehensive plan must be proposed to guide the development and management of the wharf, identifying areas for different uses and establishing guidelines for coexistence.

The promenade must improve physical and perceived connectivity along the Thames.

The space must be predominantly built with hard, permeable paving to support movement along the promenade and mitigate potential flood risks.

The wharf must be built with a hard paving to support wharf activities and other community functions to ensure its ability to function as a wharf.

The promenade must allow easy movement of pedestrians and cyclists but also include areas for stationary enjoyment of the space.

Loading and unloading activities must be designed to be limited to certain times of day to ensure that wharf area can be used as a functioning wharf and as a public space outside of operational hours.

Obstructions of the view of the River Thames must be minimised.

The space must be designed for time-shared access between pedestrians and logistics activities during different times of day.

Guidance Public furniture should be provided and oriented to maximise enjoyment of river views.

Guidance

Greenery such as trees, shrubs, and flowers should be designed to soften the hard landscape of the promenade, providing a more relaxed environment for people to use.

The look and feel of the wharf should be characteristic of a functioning wharf and not a formally landscaped open space to foster a unique identity.

The promenade should integrate with ground level functions of adjacent land uses as well as create a diverse and varied walking experience.

The design of the wharf should be adaptable and allow the wharf to be easily converted into a more formal open space in the future if demand for the wharf diminishes.

Physical activities along the Thames

Integrating with ground level functions

Existing precedent of a wharf doubling as a public space – IG Pier (Hong Kong)

Maximise river views

Public furniture oriented for river views BUILDINGS

PROMENADE Greenery to soften landscape

Loading and unloading

Maximise river views Hard paving Shared space

Green infrastructures to soften the landscape

Different material landscapes

Soft landscapes

WHARF

Figure 4.4 – Promenade strategy

Landscaped open space

RIVER THAMES

19

Figure 4.5 – Wharf strategy

4.8

Lively Street Strategy Lively streets are streets where most activities occur and street life thrives. It is characterised by plentiful active frontages lining at least one side of the street.

Mandatory

Pavements directly outside shopfronts must be clear of permanent fixtures to allow for flexible use of outdoor spaces (e.g. al-fresco dining).

Lively streets which permit vehicular access must adhere strictly to permitted hours to prevent vehicles dominating the street environment.

This will ensure greater walkability and useability of the street environment as public space.

Tranquil Street Strategy Tranquil streets are streets designed to be quieter, more commonly found in between residential buildings and lined with passive residential frontages.

Mandatory

Guidance

Active uses must be present at the ground floor level, such as restaurants or shops.

4.9

The space should encourage social interactions such as providing basic amenities and outdoor dining spaces.

Commercial activities spilling out onto the pavement (e.g. al-fresco dining) should be confined to the space directly outside of the shop space only.

Public furniture and shading should be provided where appropriate to improve walkability and the street as a destination.

Guidance

Tranquil streets which permit vehicular access must incorporate traffic calming measures to ensure pedestrian safety (both perceived and physical safety).

Residential units facing tranquil streets must have defensible spaces to clearly delineate semiprivate and public spaces.

Tranquil streets should encourage outdoor play (e.g. outdoor gym equipment).

Tranquil streets should be designed to make residents feel welcome to take domestic activities outside into the public realm.

Tranquil streets must actively adopt measures to ensure pedestrian safety (e.g. adequate illumination).

Quiet street with greenery between residential units

Pedestrian only street encouraging walkability Clear pavements Entrance open to streets

Domestic activities spaces

Active uses at ground floor levels

Semi-private and public spaces

Strict vehicular access

Confined commercial activities

Adequate lighting to ensure safety

Green infrastructure to support well-being

Encourage outdoor play

Outdoor dining spaces

Figure 4.6 – Lively street strategy

Pocket park

Figure 4.7 – Tranquil street strategy

20

15

Typologies in Canary Wharf

Typologies in Canary Wharf | London, United Kingdom TYPE MODULE PROFESSOR

Academic (Individual work) 1st Semester, Urban Design: Layout, Density and Typology Paula Morais (p.morais@ucl.ac.uk)

BUILDING SELECTION - Maine Tower |Master Plan

22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin BPLN0056 Urban Design: Layout, Density and Typology

|Building Details

|Density Measurements

Name: Maine Tower

0

UR

LIGHTERMA

B

3000

4000

5000

2

3

4

5

1

Ground coverage: 37.5*37.5/4275=0.33 (Only the tower)

The first selection is a 41 storeys tower building, Maine Tower. As the main residential tower of the Harbour Central development in Canary Wharf, London, which is situated on the Isle of Dogs between Lighterman’s Road and Dockyard Lane. The sophisticated hub of transit interchanges combining the DLR, the tube, Crossrail, and Thames Clipper river bus services will be 10 minutes’ walk from Harbour Central in the Capital. While Harbor Central will have 642 units spread across five stories, Maine Tower has 297 flats.

Benefits include a Residents Lounge, a movie theatre, a game room, and a gym at Maine Tower. Residents will have full access to Club Maine, which is housed in an attached, six-story facility that blends with the tower.

N’S ROAD

2000

Block area: 4275 m 0

Type definition:

A’

1000

2

Year completed: 2018

B’ MILLHARBO

A

MASTMAKER ROAD

Floors: 41 storeys

0

10

20

30

40

50

30

40

50

3

4

Heights of building: 41 storeys 10

0

20

FAR (Floor Area Ratio): 13.5 0

1

2

5

Population density (estimate): 594/1406=0.42 person/m

2

Building selection Plot selection

|3D View

|Section Analysis H: 41 storeys

35 storeys

H: 41 storeys

H: 35 storeys

41 storeys

A’ H: 27 storeys

H: 27 storeys

B’ 27 storeys

AS

TM

AK

ER

RO

LI

T GH

E

A RM

N’

S R

OA

LH

AR

BO

D

UR

A

H: 8 storeys

4m

A

10m

5m

18.5m

3

26.7m

27.8m

Building Raised under Garden same L I G H TFootpath E R M A Ndevelopment ’S ROAD Footpath

Maine Tower

Neighbour building Footpath

AD

H: 12 storeys

UR

12 storeys

M

IL

B’

MILLHARBO

M

MASTMAKER ROAD

H: 24 storeys

Main Road

H: 8 storeys

A’ 6

3.5

37m Sunken Garden

Footpath Footpath Inner Road

B

20m

6m 10m

Green Space Building Main Road under same Footpath development

BUILDING SELECTION - St. Hubert’s House |Master Plan

|Building Details

0

REET C H E VA L S T

B’

D MELLISH STRE

C ET

26.7m

15.5m

Maine Tower

Maine Building Open Space Club under Footpath same development

Footpath

18m

10m

B’

2000

3000

4000

5000

2

3

4

5

30

40

50

30

40

50

3

4

5

1

Ground coverage: 135*10/4400=0.3

The second selection is the 4 storeys historic building with a zigzag plot that is situated between Janet Street and Mellish Street. The Isle of Dogs Housing Society, which was established in the 1930s, collaborated with the London County Council to locate appropriate undeveloped property on the Island so that low-cost housing for local workers could be constructed there.

The apartments underwent renovation in the 1970s, and several additions, including two lift towers on the Janet Street side, were constructed. The zigzag ground plan provides the two front courtyards and a rear communal garden.

B’

Main Road

Footpath

1000

0

Type definition:

A’

ALPHA GROVE

A

8m 10m 6m Green Space Neighbour building

Block area: 4400 m2

Year completed: 1935

C’

B

|Density Measurements

Floors: 4 storeys D’

A’

22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin BPLN0056 Urban Design: Layout, Density and Typology3

Name: St. Hubert’s House

JANET STREET

H: 8 storeys

0

10

20

Heights of building: 4 storeys 10

0

20

FAR (Floor Area Ratio): 1.23 0

1

2

Population density (estimate): 240/1350=0.18 person/m2 Building selection Plot selection

|3D View

|Section Analysis

H: 4 storeys

7.5m

AL

JA

CH

EV

NE

AL

T

ST

E RE

T

4

A

PH

A

s ey or st

GR

OV

10m

15m

Main Road Footpath

Lift

Neighbour building

E

20m

H: 4 storeys

43.5m

Courtyard

Building

20m Courtyard

St Hubert’s House

15m Lift

7.5m 10m Open Space Main Road Neighbour building Footpath

A’

C

6m 5.5m 3 17m 12.5m 10m C’ Main Building Open Space Road Main Neighbour building Road Courtyard Footpath Footpath Footpath 3

Open Space Neighbour building

H: 4 storeys

ST

M RE

ET

EL

LI

SH

ST

RE

H: 4 storeys

ET

B

7.5m 8.5m 8.5m 21m 53m 21m 10m B’ Open Space Parking Main Main Parking Private Communal Garden Road Road Neighbour building Buildings Buildings Footpath Footpath 7.5m 10m

Neighbour building

St Hubert’s House

D

3 Open Space Neighbour building

6m

3 18.5m

5.5m 11m 10m

Open Space Private Main Garden Main Neighbour building Road Road Footpath Footpath Building Footpath

D’

4

Car access Developing road Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Residential (Private)

Typologies in Canary Wharf

LIGHTERMA

Main

N’S ROAD

16

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - Relationship with Neighbourhood BPLN0056 Urban Design: Layout, Density and Typology |Accessibility_St. Hubert’s House Site Map |Accessibility_Maine Tower |Street Interface_Maine Tower 22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin Given that its neighbours are entirely walled, thisoffered typology only has a few means of Typology entry to This typology is less tangible and more transparent to the eye.

After the main entry and exit, The placement of the buildings in relation to the and green areas allows a broad COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - Relationship with e Map the SiteNeighbourhood Map buildings, BPLN0056 Urbanopen Design: Layout, Density and mostly through the courtyards facingand Janet EvenThe thecharacter parking lots at area the ends block has access points on each of its sides. The sunken garden and uprise garden are still variety of connections between the public realm theStreet. structures. of the also of the plot’s twokey sides requiredwith access viawalkways the pathways for pedestrians.

The main entrances also reachable by pedestrians from the footpath. Since there are businesses on the ground level of the ranges between highways lively and restaurants and smaller streets with more Site Map |Accessibility_Maine Tower |Street Interface_Maine Tower provide access to the private garden at the back, however, only residents have access to it. plot, the public has access to the inner pathways for residents. residential usage. typology is less tangible and more transparent to the eye. After the main entry and exit, placement of the buildings in relation to the offered open and green areas allows a broad e Map This Site Map The the block has access points on each of its sides. The sunken garden and uprise garden are still variety of connections between the public realm and the structures. The character of the area also

Maine

Maine

22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin

Developing H: 24 storeys

Developing H: 24 storeys Public access Developing (no car) H: 24 storeys

Residential

St. Hubert’s House

Residential

St. Hubert’s House

Residential Car St.Parking Hubert’s House access Car

Developing H: 24 storeys

Parking

|Str

Privat by th space variou of gar

R

REET

C H E VA L S T

REET

C H E VA L S T

MASTMAKER RO MAADS T M A K E R R O A D

REET

MASTMAKER RO MAADS T M A K E R R O A D

H: 8 St. stor H

TR M E L L I S H SSt. H

Semi-Public access Semi-Public access

UR

access Courtyard Car access

H: 8 stor

Residential

MILLHARBO

MILLHARBO

Maine Tower

UR

|Accessibility_St. Hubert’s House

access Semi-Public Maine Tower access Public Commercial access Maine Tower Public Commercial LIGHTERMA Maine Tower access N’S ROAD Public Commercial access

Residential

UR

C H E VA L S T

Maine Tower Maine Tower

UR

N’S ROAD

H: 8 storeys

H: 8 storeys Main Entrance Courtyard Car Maine Tower Residential St. Hubert’s House L I S H S T R E E T Semi-Public M access Residential H:E8Lstoreys H: 8 storeys Car access access Courtyard Car Maine Tower Residential Semi-Public Maine Tower access H: 8 storeys H: 8St. storeys Developing road Hubert’s House LIGHTERMA access N ’ S R EOTA D Commercial Residential MELLISH STRE Pedestrain access St. Hubert’s House Car Maine Tower Courtyard Semi-Public Residential access Residential (Semi-public) Commercial access LIGHTERMA Maine Tower N’S ROAD Courtyard Car Semi-Public Residential (Private) Commercial

UR

LIGHTERMA

MILLHARBO

N’S ROAD

H: 8St. storeys Car Parking Hubert’s House Residential access Car Car Parking St. Hubert’s House Courtyard Residential access access H: 8 storeys

Public access (no car) Public access Residential Maine Tower Semi-Public (noaccess car)

MILLHARBO

UR

LIGHTERMA

H: 8 storeys

Public access (no car) Public access (no car)

Hubert’s House J A N E T S T R E E T Car St.Parking St. Residential Hubert’s House H: 8 storeys Residential access

ALPHA GROVE

H: 8 storeys

Developing H: 24 storeys Maine Tower Residential Public access Developing H: 24 storeys Residential

(no car) Maine Tower

MILLHARBO

MILLHARBO

Main Entrance Car access Developing road Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Main Entrance Residential (Private) Car access Developing road Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Residential (Private)

H: 8 storeys

ALPHA GROVE

MASTMAKER RO MAADS T M A K E R R O A D

access Residential St. Hubert’s House reachable by pedestrians from the footpath. Since there are businesses on the ground level of the ranges Public between key highways with lively walkways and restaurants and smaller streets with more access T (no car)Developing JANET STREET J A N E T S T R E ER H: 24 storeys Developing Car Parking Public access Residential H: 24 storeys Maine Tower plot, the public has access to the inner pathways for residents. residential usage. accessSt. Hubert’s House Residential (no car) H: 8 storeys H: 8 storeys

LIGHTERMA

Maine Tower

N’S ROAD

Commercial Commercial

Main Entrance

|Street Interface_St. Hubert’s House Car access

Neighbourhood

22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin Given that its neighbours are entirely walled, this typology only has a few means of Typology entry to BPLN0056 Urban Design: Layout, Density and buildings, mostly through the courtyards facing Janet Street. Even the parking lots at the ends of the plot’s two sides required access via the pathways for pedestrians. The main entrances also |Accessibility_St. Hubert’s House |Street Interface_Maine Tower provide access to the private garden at the back, however, only residents have access to it.

A3 S

Public Developing road access Public a private rear garden, and a private building are the sole form of interface Private parking, offered Pedestrain access Public access access by this design.

Since the whole building site is walled off,(Semi-public) it is obvious that there is no shared Residential Public space with access the nearby structures. The variabilityResidential in this area comes from the many uses that (Private) Public

|Street Interface_St. Hubert’s House various residents make of their front space, utilise for a variety of purposes, including the drying access

of garments, the storage of trash, and the cultivation of plants and flowers.

Private parking, a private rear garden, and a private building are the sole form of interface offered by this design.St.Since the whole building site is walled off, it is obvious that there is no shared Hubert’s House Residential Residential St. Hubert’s Housefor pedestrians. The main entrances also of the plot’s two sides required access via the pathways space nearby structures. The variability in this area comes from the many uses that of the ranges between key highways with lively walkways and restaurants and smaller streets with more Developing T with the St. Hubert’s House JANET STREET J A N E T S T R E E Residential H: 24 storeys Developing storeys provide access to the private garden at the back, however, only residents have access H:to24it. various residents make of their front space, utilise for a variety of purposes, including the drying residential usage.

Residential St. Hubert’s House Developing Parking Car of garments, the storage of trash, and the cultivation of plants and flowers.

Public access H: 24 storeys

Given that its neighbours are entirely walled, thisoffered typology only has a few means of entry to The placement of the buildings in relation to the open and green areas allows a broad ede exit, Map buildings, mostly through the courtyards facingand Janet EvenThe thecharacter parking lots at area the ends still variety of connections between the public realm theStreet. structures. of the also

TREET M E L L I S H SSt. Hubert’s House

R E E T H E VA L S T R E E T C

Residential Residential

Courtyard Car access Courtyard Car access L I G H T E R

A3 Scale 1:2000

JANET STREET

C H E VA L S T

C H E VA L S T

MASTMAKER ROAD

MASTMAKER ROAD

Courtyard Car access H: 8 storeys Courtyard Car access H: 8 St. storeys Hubert’s House

MELLISH STRE

ET

MELLISH STRE

ET

UR

R E E T H E VA L S T R E E T C H E VA L S T C

St. Hubert’s House

H: 8 St. storeys Car Parking Hubert’s House Residential access TREET M E L L I S H SSt. Car Parking Hubert’s House Residential access

MILLHARBO

UR

MASTMAKER ROAD

JANET STREET

ALPHA GROVE ALPHA GROVE

T T R E E Residential J A N E T S H: 8 storeys

UR

MILLHARBO

ALPHA GROVE ALPHA GROVE

access Car Parking access St. Hubert’s House Residential

MILLHARBO

ALPHA GROVE ALPHA GROVE

(no car) Public access (no car) Developing H: 24 storeys Maine Tower Residential Developing H: 8 storeys H: 24 storeys Maine Tower Residential H: 8 storeys Public access (no car) JANET STREET Public access (no car)

MAN’S ROA

D

7

A3 S

7

A3 S

Maine Tower

|Street Interface_St. Hubert’s House

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - Public and Private

|Definitions on Public, Semi-Public Private various residents make of their front space, utilise forand a variety of purposes, including the drying Thegarments, followingthe analysis has classifications of urban of storage ofidentified trash, andthree the cultivation of plants and space: flowers.

Main Entrance Car access Developing road A3 Scale 1:2000 Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Main Entrance Residential (Private) Car access Developing road Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Residential (Private)

A3 Scale 1:2000

MASTMAKER ROAD

Public Commercial Developing road Maine Tower access Public Pedestrain access Public Commercial access access Residential (Semi-public) Public Main Entrance access Residential (Private) Public Car access access Public Developing road access Private parking, a private rear garden, and a private building are the sole form of interface offered Pedestrain access Public access by this design. Since the whole building site is walled off, it is obvious that there is no shared Residential (Semi-public) space with the nearby structures. The variabilityResidential in this area comes from the many uses that (Private)

22145070_Jacqueline Lau Wan Lin A3 Scale 1:2000 BPLN0056 Urban Design: Layout, Density and Typology

St. Hubert’s House Residential Public: Unrestricted activity; open access to all citizens; mingling with others.

T J A N E T S T R E E Residential

St. Hubert’s House

Semi-Public: Appears to be public but is controlled and managed by the private sector. Publically Parkinglittle space (fences, planting, etc.)

Car with accessible access yet T ALPHA GROVE

JANET STREE

H: 8 storeys H: 8 St. storeys Hubert’s House

TREET M E L L I S H SSt. Hubert’s House

Residential Residential

ET

Private: Ownership rights allow access.

l

RE C H E VA L S T

Car Parking access

Courtyard Car access Courtyard Car access

LIGH

ALPHA GROVE

l

ALPHA GROVE ALPHA GROVE

ys

H: 8 storeys

Car Parking access Car Parking access

Main Entrance Maine Tower Residential St. Hubert’s House LISH STREET M H:E8Lstoreys H: 8 storeys Residential Car access Maine Tower Residential H: 8 storeys H: 8St. storeys Developing road Hubert’s House Residential Residential Semi-Public S T R E E T Maine Tower M E L L I S H H: Pedestrain access 8 storeys St. Hubert’s House Car access Courtyard Semi-Public Residential Maine Tower Residential Semi-Public access Residential (Semi-public) access H: 8 storeys access Main Entrance Courtyard Car E T Semi-Public Residential (Private) MELLISH STRE access Maine Tower Car access access Courtyard Car Semi-Public Commercial Maine Tower access Developing road LIGHTERMA Maine Tower access N ’ S R EOTA D Commercial Semi-Public Commercial MELLISH STRE Pedestrain access Maine Tower access Semi-Public Residential (Semi-public) Commercial LIGHTERMA Main Entrance Maine Tower access N’S ROAD Residential (Private) Commercial Car access

try to ends s also

ys

Residential Car St.Parking Hubert’s House J A N E T S T R E E T access

Public access Developing (no car) H: 24 storeys Public access (no car) JANET STREET Public access Residential Maine Tower (no car) H: 8 storeys

R E E T H E VA L S T R E E T C

Developing H: 24 storeys

MELLISH STRE

ET

ercial

rcial

UR

LIGHTERMA

Private Public

JANET STREET REET

Semi-public

C H E VA L S T

MILLHARBO

A3 Scale 1:2000

Buildings A3 Scale 1:2000 ALPHA GROVE

MASTMAKER ROAD

7

Private Main Entrance Semi-public Car access Public Developing road Pedestrain access Residential (Semi-public) Residential (Private)

MELLISH STRE

N’S ROAD

A3 Scale 1:2000

ET

|Maine Tower Analysis

|Hubert’s House Analysis

The spectrum of public / private areas in this type is more diverse. With a 6-story private gym and club connected to the tower, it features exclusive residential buildings. On the bottom level of the whole development, two public areas were created that combined with the surrounding scenery and adaptable semi-public walkways.

Private structures, semi-accessible courtyards, parking spaces on both sides, and private back gardens are the four primary types of spaces in this typology. The facility is completely gated up and has no public areas. It is difficult to categorise the courtyards as public or semi-public spaces, though, given the gates are constantly open.

ALPHA GROVE

EET

Buildings A3 Scale 1:2000

6

\Tower

WORK EXPERIENCE 02

Fubon Xinyi A25

The square floor shape has been carved out at each | Taipei, Taiwan corner creating four “notches” of 7.5 x 7.5m enhancingFubon Xinyi A25 a slender profile of the tower in particular as seen fromTYPE Professional (Group work) a diagonal angle. The four main facades form a visualDATE INVOLVED 2019~2021 contrast between the string and bold steel structure ofARCHITECT Renzo Piano, Kris Yao (Local) the notches and the crystalline “screens”, these screensSUPERVISOR David Hsu (cbdhsu@gmail.com) ROLE Junior Designer continue at the top of the building rising 25m above the roof garden level, creating a sense of infinity of theCONTRIBUTION • Construction drawings revisions tower towards the sky. The main facades are built up of a • Construction permits double skin creating an intelligent facade, the outer skin acquisition is made of single glass sheet which translates the mood • EEWH certification of the Taipei sky with the ever changing weather and • Construction Entrance view light conditions. The intelligent facades also allows the administrations users to enjoy the true light and colour of the outsidePROJECT Located in the central business air whilst being protected with an interstitial perforatedDESCRIPTION district of Taipei as a former venetian blinds which will be deployed when the fierce open air bus depot which did Taipei sun hits the glass. not contribute to the quality of

01

The ground floor of the tower is very transparent with an 11.5m tall glass facade set back from the main structural frame expressing its full strength. The ground floor is welcoming at all four sides accessible by small bridges Source: Kris Yao Artech website sunken bamboo garden which gives daylight to Fubonover Xinyi a A25 | Taipei, Taiwan functions TYPE the public Professional (Group work) at level B1.

DATE ARCHITECT SUPERVISOR ROLE CONTRIBUTION

the public realm of the Xinyi District but allowed a great opportunity for change.

2015~ongoing Renzo Piano, Kris Yao (Local) David Hsu (cbdhsu@gmail.com) Junior Designer Construction Permit, Construction Drawings, Construction Administration Events Space Executive Levels

Tower Office Upper Levels

Office Middle Levels

Office Lower Levels

Ground Floor, main entrance of To Urban permit submissions of elevation with code revisions

Fubon Xinyi A25

Fubon Xinyi A25

18

2575

2450

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE A7M-86

DITCH W45xH5 CM

ALUMINUM SUNSHADING

淺溝

鋁烤漆遮陽格柵

外牆一小時防火時效範圍

防墜落安全鋼索A7M-86

SCOPE OF 1HR FR FACADE

<

<

Bus Scooter Access Access

PAVILION

ROOF PLANTING

屋頂綠化 slope 2%

slope 2%

98

slope 2%

209

348

slope 2%

slope 2%

ROOF TERRACE

屋頂平台 M07.01 PV Cell

PV Cell

1677

2450

ALUMINUM SUNSHADING

太陽能板

太陽能板

2575

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE A7M-86

DITCH W45xH5 CM

淺溝

鋁烤漆遮陽格柵

DITCH W30xH5 CM

外牆一小時防火時效範圍

防墜落安全鋼索A7M-86

淺溝

SCOPE OF 1HR FR FACADE

ROOF PLANTING

屋頂綠化 slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

99

98

slope 2%

209

348

slope 2%

slope 2%

859

Songgao Rd.

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

淺溝

DITCH W45xH5 CM

PV Cell

1677

PV Cell

太陽能板

外牆一小時防火時效範圍

防墜落安全鋼索A7M-86

3425

洗窗機

475

725

淺溝

BMU

180

淺溝

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE A7M-86

DITCH W45xH5 CM

SCOPE OF 1HR FR FACADE

ROOF PLANTING

屋頂綠化

98

slope 2%

209

348

slope 2%

99

slope 2%

859

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86 slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

slope 2%

淺溝

42

DITCH W45xH5 CM

ROOF TERRACE

533

<

M07.01

太陽能板 DITCH W30xH5 CM

2575

slope 2%

<

屋頂平台

2450

ALUMINUM SUNSHADING

鋁烤漆遮陽格柵

Pavilion VIP drop-off SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

<

ROOF TERRACE

Connection Pavilion/Tower

屋頂平台 M07.01

1677

475

725

PV Cell

BMU

太陽能板

533

3425

洗窗機

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

1440

42

1988

slope 2%

slope 2%

1912

slope 2%

2270

99

859 淺溝

DITCH W45xH5 CM

BMU

1988

淺溝

1988

1912

121

1440

2270

121

1440

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE A7M-86

DITCH W45xH5 CM

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

1271

SCOPE OF 1HR FR FACADE

5698

R001 鋼承鈑屋頂=1094.24m² 6250

ROOF PLANTING

屋頂綠化 slope 2%

209

slope 2%

slope 2%

1262

1262

1271

5530 ROOF TERRACE

5698 R001 鋼承鈑屋頂=1094.24m²

屋頂平台

1677

M07.01

PV Cell

PV Cell

太陽能板

太陽能板

淺溝

99

slope 2%

859

slope 2%

slope 2%

DITCH W45xH5 CM

BMU

R005 截水溝=39.92m² R006 天窗=728.14m²

R004 格柵=124.09m²

slope 2%

R002 覆土30cm =14.15m²

R005 截水溝=39.92m²

R003 鋁板=526.61m²

R006 天窗=728.14m²

3425

MUSEUM

6250

1262

R004 格柵=124.09m²

R006 天窗=728.14m² 總水平投影面積=1094.24+14.15 +526.61+124.09+39.92+728.14=2527.15m²

總水平投影面積=1094.24+14.15 +526.61+124.09+39.92+728.14=2527.15m²

C棟屋頂構造檢討圖

Tower Entrance

C棟屋頂構造檢討圖

總水平投影面積=1094.24+14.15 +526.61+124.09+39.92+728.14=2527.15m²

Overall site and connections within 3 buildings Site plan of Fu

C棟屋頂構造檢討圖

533

洗窗機

Museum Entrance

475

725

180

R004 格柵=124.09m²

R002 覆土30cm =14.15m²

R003 鋁板=526.61m² R001 鋼承鈑屋頂=1094.24m² slope 2%

淺溝

1262

R003 鋁板=526.61m²

6250

DITCH W30xH5 CM

slope 2%

1262

5698

R005 截水溝=39.92m²

R002 覆土30cm =14.15m²

121

98

348

Connection Museum/ Tower

5530

5530

外牆一小時防火時效範圍

防墜落安全鋼索A7M-86

slope 2%

slope 2%

1262

1262

1262

1262

1271

Unit ownership drawings

1912

2270

2575

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

<

2450

TOWER

475

725

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

ALUMINUM SUNSHADING

533

3425

洗窗機

42

鋁烤漆遮陽格柵

<

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86 slope 2%

slope 2%

slope 2%

180

<

180

淺溝

<

PV Cell

太陽能板 DITCH W30xH5 CM

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

SAFETY RESTRAINT LINE, SEE A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

防墜落安全鋼索, 詳A7M-86

1912

\ About the Project

1440

1988 121

2270

42

1271

1262

The A25 site is a former open air bus depot which did not contribute to the quality of the public realm of the Xinyi District of Area calculation of sustainable materials for EEWH green building certification Taipei but allowed a great opportunity for change. The bus depot has been reduced in size and moved underground to create a 總水平投影面積=1094.24+14.15 public realm which can be enjoyed by the +526.61+124.09+39.92+728.14= 2527.15m² people of Taipei.

1262 5530 5698 6250

R001 鋼承鈑屋頂=1094.24m²

R004 格柵=124.09m²

R002 覆土30cm =14.15m²

R005 截水溝=39.92m²

R003 鋁板=526.61m²

R006 天窗=728.14m²

1262

C棟屋頂構造檢討圖

The constructed building will only occupy 40% of the site and the remaining land will be a public park which is generously planted with full size trees of which some have been rescued and replanted from the original site. The pavilion which houses an active retail ground floor space and the technical heart of the development provides the connection to the public North Park which is an integral part of the new urban forest.

Night render of Fu

Permit drawings of typical floor plan and area calculations

Yankuang Group Haikou HQ

19

Yankuang Group HQ

2

Yankuang Group HQ | Haikou, China TYPE DATE INVOLVED ARCHITECT SUPERVISOR ROLE CONTRIBUTION

Professional (Group work) 2020~2021 Kris Yao David Hsu (cbdhsu@gmail.com) Junior Designer • Code revisions • Schematic drawings • Model making • Construction drawings Located in the startup area of Haikou City rich with vegetation and natural ventilation. The design emphasises ecology and energy saving with double-glazed facade.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Source: Kris Yao Artech website Source: Kris Yao Artech website

kuang Group Haikou Headquarters | Haikou, China

Professional (Group work) 2020~ongoing ITECT Kris Yao RVISOR David Hsu (cbdhsu@gmail.com) Junior Designer RIBUTION Schematic Design, Model-making, Construction Drawings

Code revisions for site

Double-glazed mock-up section drawing

Jiaoxi Onsen Resort

20

Chinese restaurant section and elevation drawings

JiaoXi Onsen Resort | Yilan, Taiwan TYPE DATE INVOLVED ARCHITECT SUPERVISOR ROLE CONTRIBUTION

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1F Plan and colourings with landscape

Professional (Group work) 2020~2021 Kris Yao David Hsu (cbdhsu@gmail.com) Junior Designer • Schematic drawings • Plan/ Section drawings • Model making • Presentation making Hotspring resort design in JiaoXi, Yilan, which is famous for hotspring and recreation activities throughout winter season in Taiwan.