
11 minute read
Preoperative Malnutrition in Spine Surgery
With the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the population and associated comorbidities, there has been increased awareness among spine surgeons in patient selection and perioperative management of modifiable risk factors. One such factor, preoperative malnutrition, has been estimated to have a prevalence as high as 50% in patients undergoing spine surgery.[1-4] Additionally, preoperative malnutrition has been associated with adverse outcomes including wound complications, surgical site infections, pseudoarthrosis, increased length of hospital stay and unplanned readmissions.[1,2,5-10] Standardized nutritional scoring systems and laboratory testing are essential to assess adequate nutritional status.[9,11-14] In patients with malnutrition, appropriate perioperative nutritional support and diet management should be employed to optimize surgical outcomes.
Pathophysiology and Etiology
According to the World Health Organization, malnutrition refers to deficiencies as well as excesses of nutrition related to obesity and diet-related noncommunicable diseases (heart disease, stroke, and diabetes).15 These conditions are associated with altered metabolism, chronic inflammation, gut dysfunction, and deficiencies of vital micronutrients.[16-18] Additionally, as immune cells do not possess significant energy stores, they are heavily reliant on uptake of nutrients from the environment to function appropriately.[19,20] As a result, malnutrition leads to the inhibition of regulatory T-cell proliferation leading to decreased cytokine production, therefore limiting the ability to mount an immune response and prevent infections.[19,20] Two conditions closely associated with malnutrition—diabetes and obesity—have rapidly risen in the Unites States, with an estimated prevalence >30%. [21,22] Consequently, there has been a corresponding increase in the number of these patients undergoing spine surgery, as both conditions are associated with the development of degenerative diseases.[22] Furthermore, many nutritional deficiencies are secondary to diseases related to decreased appetite, gut absorption, and metabolic imbalances including psychiatric disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, and neoplastic processes.[11,23] Often, the etiology of malnutrition is multifaceted in nature and requires a comprehensive evaluation by clinicians.
Diagnosis and Evaluation
Preoperative evaluation of a patient’s nutritional status should begin with an appropriate history and physical examination to assess any dramatic weight changes, muscle loss or gain, nutritional intake level, BMI, and associated acute or chronic diseases.[11,12,14] Anthropometric measurements are commonly used in the literature to indicate undernutrition. In men, a calf muscle circumference of less than 31 cm and an arm muscle circumference of less than 22 cm are considered signs of undernutrition. Additionally, a measurement below 60% of the standard circumference for a given sex suggests severe malnutrition.[24,25]
However, laboratory testing has been more substantiated in the literature to diagnose malnutrition, with the most common definitions as follows: serum total lymphocyte <1,500/mm3 and serum albumin concentration <3.5 g/dL.[26-28] Low serum prealbumin <20 mg/dL and serum transferrin levels <200 mg/dL have been similarly described.[5,14,29,30] Albumin, prealbumin and transferrin are visceral proteins that are sensitive indicators of any nutritional changes. Although albumin, with a half-life of 20 days, has traditionally been regarded as the standard for assessing nutritional status, its levels can fluctuate in patients with renal disease, leading to variability in its accuracy.[5] In contrast, prealbumin is produced predominantly in the liver and detects acute changes of protein/ caloric nutrition with a half-life of 1.9 days.[5] Additionally, vitamin levels in high-risk patients and hemoglobin A1c in diabetic patients should be obtained to assess the severity of the respective diseases. Lastly, standardized screening tools are used to define malnutrition. The Rainey-MacDonald Nutritional Index (RMNI) is often employed and calculated as follows:
RMNI = (1.2 x serum albumin) + (0.013 x serum transferrin) – 6.43
A zero or negative value suggests malnutrition.[31,32] Various additional scoring systems and questionnaires are available, including the Nutritional Risk Score and Mini Nutritional Assessment.[33,34]
Malnutrition Outcomes in Spine Surgery
Adverse outcomes in the setting of spine surgery in patients with malnutrition is well-reported in the literature. Bohl et al performed a retrospective review of data collected by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), which included 4,310 patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion to investigate an association between preoperative hypoalbuminemia (as defined as <3.5 g/dL) and complications. The study found that patients with hypoalbuminemia have a higher risk of wound dehiscence (1.5% vs 0.2%, p = 0.006), surgical site infections (5.4% vs 1.7%, p = 0.010), urinary tract infections (5.4% vs 1.5%, p = 0.005), and 30-day unplanned admissions (11.7% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001).[7] Furthermore, the study noted that the prevalence of hypoalbuminemia was closely associated with increasing age, insulin-dependent diabetes, and BMI.[7]
Puvanesarajah et al conducted a retrospective review of Medicare data from 2005 to 2012, which included 148,238 patients undergoing elective 1- or 2-level posterior lumbar fusion.[8] The study noted similar results, as preoperative malnutrition was found to be predictive of increased infection rates, wound dehiscence, LOS, and 30-day readmissions.[8] Similar adverse outcomes have been noted in additional studies, including in patients undergoing other types of spine surgery, such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) and adult spinal deformity corrections.[1,2,5,6,9,10] These adverse events are associated with increased healthcare costs. Blumberg et al found that for every decrease in albumin by 1 g/dL, there was an approximately $8,081 increase in treatment cost and a 3.7 day increase in length of stay.[35]
Optimization and Treatment
In 2021, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society provided a strong recommendation in favor of a preoperative nutritional assessment and supplementation in patients undergoing elective spine surgery.[13] While there remains a paucity of literature evaluating whether modifying or optimizing preoperative nutritional status results in improved clinical outcomes, recent studies have supported this claim. Saleh et al conducted a randomized controlled trial in 103 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.[36] The intervention group received nutritional supplementation (protein shake) twice daily from postoperative day 0 to 2 weeks postdischarge while the control group was instructed to continue regular diets. Subgroup analysis of malnourished patients (defined as preoperative albumin <3.5 g/dL) who received protein shakes had lower rates of minor complications during admission (0.0% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of return to the operating room within 90 days (0.0% vs. 12.4%, p = 0.04).[36]
Liquid oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are preferred to solids due to faster gastric emptying and therefore less impact on the caloric intake of actual meals.[14] In literature outside the realm of spine surgery, a meta-analysis of 24 trials, including 2,387 adults, showed that ONS reduced overall mortality, particularly in undernourished elderly patients.[37] Other studies have found positive effects of ONS on body weight, energy/protein intake, and functional status.[38,39]
Based on the current evidence, if a patient is found to be malnourished, an informed discussion with the patient regarding potentially delaying elective surgery until the nutritional status is optimized is warranted. While additional research is needed to assess whether improving nutritional status improves outcomes following spine surgery, addressing malnutrition preoperatively remains a reasonable approach to potentially reduce the risk of complications.
Conclusion
Given the high prevalence of malnutrition in our population, careful attention must be placed to assess patients’ nutritional status prior to surgery. Multiple tools, including laboratory tests and nutritional scoring systems, may be employed by spine surgeons in the diagnostic evaluation of these patients. In prioritizing nutrition in our patients, potential postoperative complications may be avoided. When malnutrition is detected, nutritional counseling should be administered, consisting of dietary advice, meal fortification and oral nutritional supplements in the preoperative setting.
References
1. Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Mehta AI, Cheng J, Bagley CA, Karikari IO. Preoperative nutritional status is an independent predictor of 30-day hospital readmission after elective spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(17):1400-1404.
2. Elsamadicy AA, Havlik J, Reeves BC, et al. Effects of preoperative nutritional status on complications and readmissions after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis: A propensity-score analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;211:107017.
3. Phan K, Kim JS, Xu J, et al. Nutritional insufficiency as a predictor for adverse outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J. 2018;8(2):164-171.
4. Ehresman J, Ahmed AK, Schilling A, et al. Preoperative nutrition consults associated with decreased postoperative complication rate and decreased length of hospital stay after spine metastasis surgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e173-e179.
5. Tempel Z, Grandhi R, Maserati M, et al. Prealbumin as a serum biomarker of impaired perioperative nutritional status and risk for surgical site infection after spine surgery. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2015;76(2):139-143.
6. Adogwa O, Martin JR, Huang K, et al. Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of postoperative complication after spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(18):1513-1519.
7. Bohl DD, Shen MR, Mayo BC, et al. Malnutrition predicts infectious and wound complications following posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(21):1693-1699.
8. Puvanesarajah V, Jain A, Kebaish K, et al. Poor nutrition status and lumbar spine fusion surgery in the elderly: readmissions, complications, and mortality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(13):979-983.
9. Bisson EF, Dimar J, Harrop JS, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for perioperative spine: preoperative nutritional assessment. Neurosurgery. 2021;89(Suppl 1):S26-S32.
10. Reyes J, Katiyar P, Greisberg G, et al. Preoperative nutritional optimization for adult spinal deformity: review. Spine Deform. 2024;12(2):257-262.
11. Qureshi R, Rasool M, Puvanesarajah V, Hassanzadeh H. Perioperative nutritional optimization in spine surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31(3):103-107.
12. Cross MB, Yi PH, Thomas CF, Garcia J, Della Valle CJ. Evaluation of malnutrition in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(3):193-199.
13. Debono B, Wainwright TW, Wang MY, et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J. 2021;21(5):729-752.
14. Nieuwenhuizen WF, Weenen H, Rigby P, Hetherington MM. Older adults and patients in need of nutritional support: review of current treatment options and factors influencing nutritional intake. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(2):160-169.
15. Fact sheets - malnutrition [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2024 Sept 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/ news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition
16. Kong LC, Holmes BA, Cotillard A, et al. Dietary patterns differently associate with inflammation and gut microbiota in overweight and obese subjects. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109434.
17. Pereira-Santos M, Costa PR, Assis AM, Santos CA, Santos DB. Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4):341-349.
18. Sánchez A, Rojas P, Basfi-Fer K, et al. Micronutrient deficiencies in morbidly obese women prior to bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):361-368.
19. Cohen S, Danzaki K, MacIver NJ. Nutritional effects on T-cell immunometabolism. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47(2):225-235.
20. Gerriets VA, MacIver NJ. Role of T cells in malnutrition and obesity. Front Immunol. 2014;5:379.
21. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008. JAMA. 2010;303(3):235-241.
22. Moretti L, Medeiros LJ, Kunkalla K, Williams MD, Singh RR, Vega F. N-terminal PAX8 polyclonal antibody shows cross-reactivity with N-terminal region of PAX5 and is responsible for reports of PAX8 positivity in malignant lymphomas. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(2):231-236.
23. Damms-Machado A, Weser G, Bischoff SC. Micronutrient deficiency in obese subjects undergoing low calorie diet. Nutr J. 2012;11:34.
24. Pratt WB, Veitch JM, McRoberts RL. Nutritional status of orthopedic patients with surgical complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(155):81-84.
25. Murphy MC, Brooks CN, New SA, Lumbers ML. The use of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) tool in elderly orthopaedic patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54(7):555-562.
26. Jaberi FM, Parvizi J, Haytmanek CT, Joshi A, Purtill J. Procrastination of wound drainage and malnutrition affect the outcome of joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(6):1368-1371.
27. Greene KA, Wilde AH, Stulberg BN. Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients. Relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6(4):321-325.
28. Puskarich CL, Nelson CL, Nusbickel FR, Stroope HF. The use of two nutritional indicators in identifying long bone fracture patients who do and do not develop infections. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(6):799-803.
29. Beiner JM, Grauer J, Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR. Postoperative wound infections of the spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2003;15(3):E14.
30. McPhee IB, Williams RP, Swanson CE. Factors influencing wound healing after surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23(6):726-732; discussion 732-733.
31. Font-Vizcarra L, Lozano L, Ríos J, Forga MT, Soriano A. Preoperative nutritional status and post-operative infection in total knee replacements: a prospective study of 213 patients. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34(9):876-881.
32. Rainey-Macdonald CG, Holliday RL, Wells GA, Donner AP. Validity of a two-variable nutritional index for use in selecting candidates for nutritional support. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1983;7(1):15-20.
33. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):321-336.
34. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al; ESPEN (European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition). ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(2):224-244.
35. Blumberg TJ, Woelber E, Bellabarba C, Bransford R, Spina N. Predictors of increased cost and length of stay in the treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infection. Spine J. 2018;18(2):300-306.
36. Saleh H, Williamson TK, Passias PG. Perioperative nutritional supplementation decreases wound healing complications following elective lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(6):376-383.
37. Milne AC, Avenell A, Potter J. Oral protein and energy supplementation in older people: a systematic review of randomized trials. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Clin Perform Programme. 2005;10:103-125.
38. Stratton RJ, Elia M. Encouraging appropriate, evidence-based use of oral nutritional supplements. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69(4):477-487.
39. Potter JM, Roberts MA, McColl JH, Reilly JJ. Protein energy supplements in unwell elderly patients—a randomized controlled trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001;25(6):323-329.
Contributor:
Gregory Lopez, MD
Neil Mohile, MD
From DISC Sports and Spine Center in Newport Beach, California.