Soil Structure effect on buildings: A review by IRJET Journal

Soil Structure effect on buildings: A

review

Jitendra Shrivastava1 , Prof. Gaurav Shrivastava2

1M.Tech. Student Department of Civil Engineering, VITM College, Gwalior(M.P.), India 2Professer Department of Civil Engineering, VITM College, Gwalior (M.P.), India ***

Abstract: The building constructions are made popular day by day. As we probably are aware in present days, the seismic examination of the great ascent structures and enormous structure is most significant on the grounds that to increment normal time of structure and solidness against seismic peril yet there is an another component which convey their novel significance in seismic investigation, this element or impact is called Soil Structure Interaction (SSI). Assuming seismic examination of any structure is finished by considering SSI impact than we can build the adaptability of the structure in tremor inclined zones and structure make more tough .The SSI impact is more critical in solid structure on soft soil..

I. INTRODUCTION

Weperceivethatsoilplaysoutasignificantsituationinourstructurepresencelikestructures,dames,spans,watertanks,thus numerous frameworks. Soil is that the lower part of each structure. Assuming one need to choose develop any structure fundamentalwemustexaminethesoilkind,nature,solidnessandSBCandsoforthalltogetherthatstructurewouldbeallthe moredurable.Byandbyreturntothereasonwhywemustresearchprofoundlyinregardstosoilpeculiarities.Thetermsoil structure implies, here the meaning of soil structure is: soil structure is disclosed by approach individual particles of sand, sediment,andmudunitofestimationcollected.youactuallyshouldknowconnectingwiththestructureofthesoilwhereyou intendtoframeastructure.

II. SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION

The investigation of soil structureinteraction (SSI) is connected with the field of seismic designing. It is vital to take note of thattheprimaryreactionischieflybecauseofthesoil structureinteractionpowersthatwelcomesaneffectonthestructure. This is a type of seismic excitation. A board of designing exploration manages the investigation of soil structure interaction just when these powers welcomes an apparent impact on the cellar movement when we are contrasting it and the free field groundmovement.Thefree fieldgroundmovementcanbecharacterizedasthemovementrecordedontheouterlayerofthe soil,withouttheassociationofthestructure.

Figure1Differentshapesofbuilding

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

(IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

III. LITERATURE REVIEW

VariousworksaregivenonSSIeffectofbuilding whichsummarizedareasfollows

Felix S. Wong (1984) InthispaperAstrategytoassesstheimpactofboundaryvulnerabilitiesonthepowerful reactionofa soil structure framework is depicted and represented. The technique depends on the reaction surface procedure and is completely viable with current mathematical demonstrating codes (PC programs) used to break down unique soil structure interaction.Itcomprisesof theturnofeventsofa graduatingcapacitywhichapproximatesthegenuinereaction,inlightof a set number of code assessments. The graduating capacity, called the reaction surface, is then used to assess the impacts of vulnerabilitiesinsteadofthesoil structureinteractioncode.Thetechniquetypifiesthecustomaryparametricorontheother hand responsiveness investigation methods and can be viewed as an augmentation of the incomplete subsidiary strategy or first request,second secondtechniquetothemathematicaldomain.

Dan M. Ghiocel (2002) A technique is introduced for the probabilistic examination of the seismic soil structure interaction issue. The technique represents vulnerability in both the free field input movement just as in nearby site conditions, and underlyingboundaries.Dubiousboundariesaredemonstratedinvolvingaprobabilisticstructureasstochasticcycles.Thesite intensification impacts are represented by means of a randomized connection between the soil shear modulus and damping fromoneperspective,andtheshearstrainofthesubgradeontheotherhand,justasbydemonstratingtheshearmodulusat low strain level as haphazardly fluctuating with profundity. The different arbitrary cycles are addressed by their separate Karhunen Loe'veextensions,andthearrangementprocesses,comprisingofthespeedincreasesandsummeduppowersinthe structure, are addressed by their directions concerning the polynomial turmoil premise. These directions are then, at that point, assessed by a blend of weighted residuals and defined examining plans. The development can be utilized to complete proficiently,broadMonteCarlorecreations.Themethodisappliedtotheseismicinvestigationofanatomicreactoroffice

Jun-Seong Choi (2004) This paper exhibits how framework recognizable proof procedures can be effectively applied to a soil structure interaction framework utilizing the quake reaction information. The boundaries distinguished are the shear moduliofafewclosefieldsoillocalesandYoung'smodulioftheshellsegmentsofthestructure.Thesoil structureinteraction framework isdisplayedbythelimitedcomponenttechniquejoinedwiththeendless componentdetailingfortheunbounded layered soil medium. The reproduced quake reactions utilizing the distinguished boundaries are demonstrated to be in magnificentconcurrencewiththenoticedreactioninformation.Forecastofthereactionsisadditionallycompletedforabigger quake occasion involving the distinguished boundaries as the underlying properties in the same linearization system. It has beenviewedthatastheanticipatedreactionsareadditionallycontrastedquitewellandthedeliberatereactions.

Mark J. Masia1 (2004) The paper says, A soil/structure interaction model for the reproduction of the primary reaction, including divider breaking, of lightweight stone work structures to broad soil developments is depicted. The recreation of swell and psychologist in far reaching soils because of changes in soil attractions is examined. The model is equipped for imitatingthe fundamental elementsoftheunderlying reactionsawinfull scaletests.Basicdemonstrating presumptionsand the utilization of static buildup of the worldwide solidness conditions permit quick arrangement paces to be accomplished. Thesoil/structureinteractionmodel issubsequentlyreasonableforuseinawarenessstudiesandprobabilistic examinations of brick work dividers with a wide scope of conceivable primary calculations and break areas. The model has likely applications for concentrating on the conduct of a couple of story structures of workmanship facade, full block/square, or cavity development, especially in a probabilistic system. In spite of the fact that planned explicitly for the recreation of sweeping soil developments, the impacts of different wellsprings of establishment deformity such as differential settlement andminesubsidencecanlikewisebeexamined.

M. Dicleli (2005) In this paper, the impact of soil structure interaction on the seismic presentation of seismic confined scaffoldsisexamined.Forthisreason,tworegularseismicallyconfinedextensionsarechosen.Thechosespanshaveparticular highlights to address those scaffolds with: (1) Heavy superstructure and light substructure and (2) light superstructure and weighty substructure. Nitty gritty underlying models of both spans barring and including the soil structure interaction impactsarefirstdeveloped.Iterativemultimodereactionrangeexaminationsoftheextensionsarethenledthinkingaboutthe nonlinearconductofthedisconnectionorientation.The investigations resultshave uncoveredthatsoil structureinteraction impacts might be disregarded in the seismic examination of seismic secluded extensions with weighty superstructure and lightsubstructure builton solidsoil.Be thatasit may,thesoil structureinteractionimpactsshouldbeconsidered for spans

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology

(IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

with light superstructure also weighty substructures paying little mind to the solidness of the establishment soil. In delicate soilconditions,soil structureinteractionimpactsshouldbeviewedaspayinglittlemindtotheextensiontype.

Mary W. Goodson (2005) Representing soil structure interaction is significant for plan of new structures as well as giving seismicretrofitofexistingstructures.Thispaperdepictsastrategyusedtoinvestigatesoilstructureinteractionforaseismic retrofit plan. The retrofit involves determined energy dissemination through soil structure interaction as a necessary some portionoftheseismicpoweropposingframework.Seismicity,soilprofile,andheaplengthdifferalongthewholelengthofthe pipelinegoingthroughretrofit.Toportraytheapproach,heaplimitsaresetup, soilspringscreatedalsoablendofweakling, timehistory,andreactionrangeinvestigationsusedtoportraythenormalconductunderexpectedseismicstacking.

Xiong Zhang (2006) In this paper, coupled hydro mechanical pressure jointed (contact) components are proposed to reproducethesoilstructureinteractionbetweenthesoilandchunks,andthecoupledunionhypothesisisutilizedtomimicthe volume change of the soil. The proposed innovation isn't pristine. Nonetheless, it gives a method for recreating the soil structureinteractioninamorethoroughandreasonablemanner.Thesectioncanbeofanyshapeandthegroundsoilcanbe either soaked or unsaturated. A genuine soil, totally portrayed by tests on examples taken from a site in Arlington, Texas is utilizedtoexhibittheproposedinnovation.

Alper Ucak (2008) Thejobofsoil structureinteractionSSIonthereactionofseismicallyseparatedscaffoldsisconsidered.A conventionalbilinearhystereticmodel isusedtodisplaytheseparation framework.Theconductofthedockisthoughttobe straight and the establishment framework is displayed with recurrence subordinate springs and dashpots. Two extension frameworks were thought of, one agent of short firm roadway bridge frameworks and one more delegate of tall adaptable multi span expressway spans. Nonlinear time history examinations were utilized with two arrangements of seismic movements;onecontaining20far fieldaccelerogramsandonewith20closeshortcomingaccelerograms.Theoutcomesfrom these thorough mathematical examinations show that soil structure interaction causes higher disengagement framework floatsjustas,innumerouscases,higherdockshearswhencontrastedwiththefixed span.

Anil Misra (2008) Inthispaper,thepurported"t z"modelisusedforthearrangementofsoil structureinteractionissueata givenphaseofthepipejackingactivity.Thissoil structureinteractionmodel canbeappliedtodecidetherelocationconduct and inner burdens of the primary component when exposed to a jacking power. Here we have applied the technique to recreate a progression of cases for evaluating the jacking power uprooting conduct and line pressure by shifting the soil structure interaction boundaries. Moreover, the investigation strategy is consolidated with a probabilistic way to deal with evaluatetheimpactofspatialchangeabilityuponthejackingpowerandlinepressure.

Aparna Gosh (2008) The proposed technique with the nonconventional damper enjoys the benefit of being pertinent to nonlinear designs having high introductory firmness short normal periodin the direct reach beneath yield with resulting period protracting in the postyield stage, where the regular LCD would be insufficient. The justification for the absence of viabilityisn'tsimplybecauseofthedamperboundariesintendedforthedirectconstructionbecomingunimportantwhenthe designs move to the inelastic system yet in addition due to the limitation forced by the high normal time of the ordinary damper on its relevance to relatively solid designs for tuning. The technique in this paper, consequently integrating the utilizationofachangedmodeloftheLCDframework,tobespecificaspring associatedone,eliminatestheprerequisiteonthe normal timeofthefluidintheLCDandfurther,theplandependsontheboundariesofanidentical directframework forthe nonlinearstructure.Thelastoptionhasbeenaddressedbyasolitarylevelof opportunityframeworkwithbilinearhysteresis. A method for getting the identical straight framework for the nonlinear construction by embracing a transiently found the middlevalueoflinearizationmethodhasbeenillustrated.

Arul K. Arulmoli1 (2009) the method involved with fostering a public norm for the seismic plan of piers and wharves by joining remarkable highlights from accessible execution based seismic plan codes and rules. As a piece of this work, seismic soil structure interaction related with piers and wharves are being tended to by a gathering of underlying and geotechnical architects and proprietors with interest in seismic plan of piers and wharves. This paper examines parallel soil structure interactionissuesandgivesrulesandideastoworkontheassessmentinteractionwhilekeepingavigorousplan.theseismic plan and assessment of piers and wharves to accomplish a particular degree of execution utilizing an uprooting approach dependentonatleasttwodegreesofseismictremormovements.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

O. Sariyar (2010) In this review, soil structure cooperation SSI is examined by utilizing master frameworks, specifically, neuralorganizationNNapproaches.ThisstrategygivesanotherperspectiveforassessmentsofSSIandlanduse.Information from 58 neighborhood locales in California, in particular, quake, design, and soil property information, are utilized. In the master framework approach, two NN structures are utilized: the back proliferation NN design and the overall relapse NN GRNN engineering. There are 21 boundaries considered as information and 4 result boundaries. The four result boundaries picked are soil to structure unbending nature proportion, period stretching, establishment damping, and whether or not SSI impacts can be ignored. The outcomes show that the GRNN approaches are more valuable and strong for assessment of SSI andlanduse.

Lance A. Roberts (2010) In this article, The created load settlement bend can be dissected utilizing execution based plan standards,like a restricting mediocre settlementanda workablenesssettlement. The restrictingmediocresettlement can be chosen to compare to a development that will either cause inordinate burdens in the design or render a construction inoperable while a workableness settlement would compare to a development that would cause antagonistic execution or unnecessary upkeep issues with the design. In this paper, a presentation based soil structure collaboration configuration approach for hub plan of profound establishments under the AASHTO Strength and Service Limit States is introduced. The plan approach can be incorporated inside the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) system to foster an effective approachforfulfillingthesecutoffstatestandards.

Bashar S. Qubain (2011) Inthisadditionthevibrationlevelsoughttothemachineactivitynorunfavorablyinfluencenearby delicate gear. To accomplish these destinations, nitty gritty subsurface portrayal along with three dimensional dynamic soil structure cooperation utilizing ABAQUS limited component program is executed. The whole structure which houses the rotatorandencompassingregioncountingthemachinepitandestablishmentareconsolidatedintotheexamination.Todecide the vibration levels in different pieces of the structure, history hubs are consolidated into the model at key areas to save PC timeandsimultaneouslygiveadequatedetailofthegeneralestablishmentreaction.

Gregory S. Wachman (2011) Theresultfromanearthpressurecell(EPC)istypicallyconnectedwiththeordinarypressure in soil through liquid alignment, where a known pressure is applied to the EPC and the result is recorded. Be that as it may, circulationofordinarypressureinsideasoilisn'tuniform,andtheEPCisnotanoptimallayer twistingfirmnessinfluences thereaction.ThesevariablesmuddlethepresentationoftheEPC.AnadjustmentmethodologyforanEPCisinvestigated,andit isshownthatthesedisputablesensorscangiveanexactproportionofnormalordinarypressurewheneveradjustedinsoilat agiventhickness.What'smore,asoil structureinteractionmodelisproposedtoclarifywhysoilalignmentisessential

Hany Farouk1 (2014) This paper showed that, the soil structure interaction significantly affects the modulus of subgrade response. Generally planners accepted K for edge is half of the internal one and the corner is quarter, which depends on the regionthateachspringaddressesexpectinguniformks.ksisn'tconsistentlydisseminatedunderthefootings.Consideringthe soilstructureinteractionresultssomewhatchangeintheordinarypowersinthesegments.Forthepapermodel,thischange leadtoincrementintheexternalsegmentsanddiminishingtheinternalsections.Forthecomplexunderlyingframeworks,the appropriation can't be assessed. The adjustment of the ordinary powers changes the came about contact pressure and settlement,whichchangesthecameaboutks.Wearedeprivedformoreinvestigatesinthisimpacttostreamlinetheprecisely estimation.Thesedays,utilizationofageotechnicallimitedcomponentprogramthatcanthinkaboutsoil,establishments,and superstructureimpactisexceptionallysuggested.

Hubert Law (2014) This outcomes in a general framework with complex conduct during a tremor, which should be painstakingly viewed as in the examination and plan. Demonstrating methods with differing levels of intricacy are exhibited dependentonprojectinsightfromthreescaffoldsinexceptionallyseismicdistrictsincluding:SecondTacoma NarrowsBridge (WA),StraitofMessinaBridge(Italy)andSouthParkBridge(WA).Utilizationofmathematicalmodelweaklingexaminations to foster nonlinear appropriated soil springs is displayed to assist with beating a few of the impediments of the more fundamentallumpedstraightfirmnessframeworkapproach.Thefamilymembersignificanceofwavedissipatingimpactsand theassessmentsofearthpressuredispersionsconsideringseismicstackingsituationsforevaluationofrequiredfortifications areadditionallytendedto.

Melissa A. Stewart (2014) This review presents an axis demonstrating way to deal with describe the transient thermo mechanicalreactionofenergyestablishmentsduringwarmingcoolingcyclestogiveinformationtoalignmentandapprovalof soil structureinteractionmodels.This reviewcentersaround the reaction ofa scale model energy establishmentintroduced

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

in an unsaturated sediment layer with end bearing limit conditions. The establishment reaction was evaluated utilizing implanted strain checks and thermocouples. Different factors observed incorporate establishment head relocations, soil surface removals, and changes in temperature and volumetric water content in the unsaturated sediment at various profunditiesandoutspreadareas.Estimationsduringtheunderlyingwarminginteractiondemonstratethatthewarmpivotal pressureismoreprominentclosetothetoeoftheestablishmentbecauseofthelimitationrelatedwithactivationofsideshear oppositionalongthelengthoftheestablishment.Thewarmhubstrainswerenearthefreeexpansionwarmstrainclosetothe soil surface and diminished with profundity. The warm pivotal relocations determined by coordinating the warm pivotal strainscomparewellwiththefreelyestimatedheadrelocations.

Eric Allard (2015) Heger pressure conveyances are viewed as a central instrument in the plan of RC courses, as per the immediate plan technique. Nonetheless, a few elements known to influence soil structure interaction are ignored when utilizingHegerpressuredispersions.Thesevariablesincorporatetheimpactofthechannelcalculation,theoverallfirmnessof thecurrentsoiltotheinlay,andtheinternmentprofundityofthestructure.Thispaperpresentsadefinitelimitedcomponent examination parametric review that researches the exactness and pertinence of Heger pressure circulations for courses in incompletechannelestablishmentswhenthepreviouslymentionedfactorsarethoughtof.

Hari Aamidala (2015) Thispaper,usingexaminationofRigidFrameStructures,investigatesvariousstrategiesfordisplaying structures with an end goal to comprehend the advantages, or deficiency in that department, of bringing more factors and intricacy into a model. The center is on an improved on strategy for the demonstrating of soil structure interaction and examining a unbending edge structure. Through this work it was seen that as, as opposed to utilizing an costly 3D demonstratingprogramming,ordinarilyaccessibleprimaryinvestigationlikeLARSAcanbeutilizedtomakeastraightforward soil structure interaction model. This straightforward strategy permitted us to rapidly make various models to proficiently examinevariousotheroptions.

Farid Khosravikia (2017) This paper uncovers the results of rehearsing the 2015 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) soilstructure interaction (SSI) arrangements, which structure the premise of the 2016 version of the seismicplanstandardgivenbytheASCE.Forthisreason,thelikelihoodthattheactofSSIarrangements,inlieuoffixed base arrangements, expands the malleability interest of the structure processed. It is consequently explored whether the NEHRP arrangementsarewithoutadoubtanimprovementupontheSSIarrangementsofthecurrentASCEseismicplanstandard.To thisend,720soil structureframeworkswithvariousquantitiesofstories,underlyingframeworks,viewpointproportions,and establishment implant proportions on different site classes are examined. A probabilistic system is utilized to represent winning vulnerabilities in ground movement and in the properties of the soil structure framework. It is presumed that both NEHRP and the current arrangements result in hazardous plans for structures with surface establishment on modestly delicate soils, however NEHRP somewhat refines the current arrangements for squat structures. For structures on exceptionallydelicatesoils,thetwoarrangementsyieldmoderateplanswhereNEHRPisconsiderablymoremoderate.Atlong last,thetwoarrangementsyieldcloseidealplansfordifferentframeworks.

Jaime A. Mercado (2019) The primary objective of this paper is to assess the power measures and designing interest boundariesfora theoretical tall structuresituatedina metropolitanclimate,downtown LosAngeles,including theimpactof establishment soils in the structure reaction. Mathematical recreations of a theoretical tall structure upheld in a mat establishment are performed utilizing the tension ward multi yield surface constitutive soil model coded in OpenSees. The structure is exposed to three seismic tremors levels. In view of the structure reactions also registered pinnacle story level speed increases, greatest between story floats, and settlements, ends are drawn with regards to the impact of soil structure interactioninthereactionoftallstructures.

Payal jain (2021) The current review point depends on seismic examination of working with Soil Structure Interaction impactontwodistinctivesoil.AoutlinerectangularstructureofG+6storyhasbrokedownforadaptablebaserecreatingsand andearthsoilconditionsTheproductisutilizedSAP2000.Pontoonestablishmenthasbeendemonstratedtoo.Examinationis madewiththereactionrangeofIS18932016code.SeismicreactionofSSIexaminationresultsarelookatasfarassidelong storyuprooting,baseshearandmodularconductofregulartime frameonvarioussortofsoil(earthandsand).what'smore inferthatthesidelongstoryrelocation,baseshearandregulartimespanesteemsinSSIinvestigationwithsandsoilisgreatest ascontrastwithmudsoil.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

IV. CONCLUSION

After read all the above researches, we conclude that the SSI building behave differently in case of strength and seismic performanceinvarioussoftware. TheeffectofSSIgiveverypreciseresultsfromseismicbehavior Sooverallconclusionsays, TheSSIeffectisdependontheseismicperformance

REFERENCES

[1] FelixS.Wong(1994)"UncertaintiesInDynamicSoil StructureInteraction"byASCEJ.Eng.Mech.1984.110:308 324.

[2] DanM. Ghiocel,andRogerG.Ghanem,(2002)"StochasticFinite ElementAnalysisof Seismic Soil StructureInteraction" JournalOfEngineeringMechanics.

[3] Jun SeongChoi,Jong SehLee,andChung BangYun(2004)"IdentificationoftheSoil StructureInteractionSystemUsing EarthquakeResponseData".JournalOfEngineeringMechanicsbyAsce

[4] Mark J. Masia, Peter W. Kleeman and Robert E. Melchers (2004) "Modeling Soil Structure Interaction for Masonry Structures.JournalOfStructuralEngineering byAsce.

[5] M. Dicleli, S. Albhaisi and M. Y. Mansour (2005) "Static Soil Structure Interaction Effects in Seismic Isolated Bridges" PracticePeriodicalOnStructuralDesignAndConstructionbyAsce.

[6] MaryW.GoodsonandJohnE.Anderson.(2005)"Soil StructureInteraction ACaseStudy"StructuresCongressbyASCE.

[7] Zhang A. and Alkaz V. (2006) "Soil structure interaction effects on an instrumented building" Journal of Earthquake Engineering.5:533 547.

[8] Alper Ucak and Panos Tsopelas (2008) " Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Seismic Isolated Bridges" Journal Of StructuralEngineeringbyASCE

[9] Anil Misra, Lance A. Roberts and Mohammad Najafi (2008) "Probabilistic Soil Structure Interaction Model for Pipe JackingForceAnalysis"PipelinesbyASCE

[10]Aparna Ghosh and Biswajit Basu (2008) " Seismic Vibration Control of Nonlinear Structures Using the Liquid Column Damper"JournalOfStructuralEngineeringbyASCE.

[11]Arul K. Arulmoli and Geoffrey R. Martin (2009) " Seismic Soil Structure Interaction Issues for Pile Supported Piers and Wharves"LifelineEarthquakeEngineeringinaMultihazardEnvironment.

[12]O.SariyarandD.N.Ural(2010)"ExpertSystemApproachforSoilStructureInteractionandLandUse"JournalOfUrban PlanningAndDevelopmentbyASCE.

[13]Lance A. Roberts Damon Fick and Anil Misra (2010) " Design of Bridge Foundations using a Performance Based Soil StructureInteractionApproach"StructuresCongressbyASCE.

[14]Bashar S. Qubain, Jianchao Li and Kristen E. Chang (2011) " Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction of High G Centrifuge Foundation"Geo FrontiersbyASCE

[15]Gregory S. Wachman and Joseph F. Labuz, F. (2011) " Soil Structure Interaction of an Earth Pressure Cell" Journal Of GeotechnicalAndGeoenvironmentalEngineeringby ASCE

[16]Hany Farouk and Mohammed Farouk (2014) " Effect of Elastic Soil Structure Interaction on Modulus of Subgrade Reaction" RecentAdvancesinMaterial,Analysis,Monitoring,andEvaluation111inFoundationandBridgeEngineering byASCE.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

[17]Hubert Law and Patrick Wilson (2014) " Soil Structure Interaction for Gravity Caissons in Bridge Seismic Design" StructuresCongressbyASCE.

[18]Melissa A. Stewart and John S. McCartney (2014) " Centrifuge Modeling of Soil Structure Interaction in Energy Foundations"J.Geotech.Geoenviron.Eng.byASCE.

[19]Eric Allard and Hany E Naggar (2015) " Pressure Distribution around Rigid Culverts Considering Soil Structure InteractionEffects"Int.J.Geomech.,04015056.

[20]Hari Aamidala and John Kim (2015) " A Simplified Method for Modeling Soil Structure Interaction for Rigid Frame Structures"StructuresCongressbyASCE.

[21]FaridKhosravikia,Mojtaba MahsuliandM.AliGhannad(2017)" ProbabilisticEvaluationof2015NEHRPSoil Structure InteractionProvisions"J.Eng.MechbyASCE.

[22]Jaime A. Mercado, Luis G. Arboleda Monsalve and Vesna Terzic (2019) " Seismic Soil Structure Interaction Response of TallBuildings".Geo CongressbyASCE.

[23]Payal jain (2021) "Comparative Study of Soil Structure Interaction Analysis of Building on Clayey and Sandy Soil" IJRASET InternationalJournalforResearchinAppliedScience&EngineeringTechnology,Volume9IssueIX,

[24]IS:1893.(Part 1)(2016).CriteriaforEarthquakeResistingDesignforStructures.Part1GeneralProvisionandBuildings (SixthRevision),BIS,NewDehli,India

[25]IS:456.(2000).PlainandReinforcedConcrete CodeofPractice(FourthRevision,BIS,NewDehli,India