IRJET- Behaviour of Structural Member under Blast Loading

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 01 | Jan 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Behaviour of Structural Member under Blast Loading Sakshi Bhatia1, Aditya Kumar Tiwary2 1Research

Scholar, Civil Engineering Department, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Chandigarh University, Mohali, ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------2Assistant

Abstract - In recent years, explosives have become the weapon of choice in many of the terrorist attacks that not only affect human health but also shape and structural wholeness. A bomb blast near a building can cause great pressure and produce large amounts of heat, which can lead to heavy loads on the building and its equipment. Such overloading could cause serious damage to the structure of the exterior and interior structure, the collapse of walls, high cost of windows, and the closure of critical health safety systems. As a result of the great impact of this massive dynamic load, attempts have been made in the last few decennaries to evolve analytical methods and to build an explosion-resistant structure. As eruption is an important subject to study it therefore requires a careful understanding of the eruption of effects and its effect and impact on various structural elements.

explosive loads (Kirk, et al., 2005). Providing appropriate security from explosions, construction and construction of public buildings is receiving new concerns from building engineers. The complexities that accompany the difficulty of the problem, including the time-dependent disability, elevated levels of difficulty, and the behavior of offline material, have led to more thinking and balancing to make models easier. These types take the full range of development from one level of freedom programs to standard programs of limited resources such as ABAQUS, ANSYS, and ADINA etc.

1.1 Chemistry of Explosives Modelling and Analysis of explosive blow-out requires a great knowledge of chemistry because the chemical composition of an explosive origin governs its physical properties like detonation velocity. Explosive detonations are products of complex physical and chemical processes within and in the immediate locality of the explosive and are followed by a near-instantaneous release of a huge amount of energy in the form of heat, light and sound. The chemical reactions associated with an explosion are hence oxidation and exothermic reactions because the reactants are oxidized to give a mix of hot aeriform products.

Key Words: Chemistry of explosives, oxidation, explosion and blast phenomenon, explosive air blast loading, blast wave scaling laws 1. INTRODUCTION In the last few decades terrorism acts and threats are a thriving global issue that is not only affecting human health but also challenging the structure and integrity of the body.

Greater stress has been laid on the earthquakes and their effects. The problem of earthquakes is very ancient, but most of the study and information on this subject has been collected over the past six decades. The explosion problem is completely fresh; Details of developments in the sector are made accessible primarily via the publication of the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Defense, Public institutions and other government offices.

1.2 Oxidation There are two major types of oxidation reactions involved in explosions.

As a result of a variety of accidental or deliberate incidents, the characteristic of the material targeted at the explosion load has been the concern of much research exercise in recent times. Ordinary constructions, especially that over a distance, are usually not created to withstand explosion loads; and because the size of the design loads is much inferior to that generated by most explosions, typical structures are at risk of explosion. Taking this into consideration, developers, architects and engineers are progressively looking for quick fixes to potentially explosive locations, to secure residents and builders from catastrophes such as the Khobar Military Towers at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, and at the World Trade Center in New York in 1993 highlighting the urgency for a comprehensive behavioral assessment of columns facing

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529



In the first type, there are two reaction components, gasoline and oxidizer, which react to the formation of explosive products.



A second type of reaction, involves a single device in which the fuel and the oxidizer are contained in the same molecule that goes off in the course of the reaction and is converted into oxidized products. It is very common in explosions.

If oxygen is left behind after the formation of carbon dioxide, then the explosion is called over-oxidized. Any oxygen left behind after CO2 formation forms O2. However, most explosives, with the exception of nitro-glycerin and ammonium nitrate, do not have enough oxygen to convert all carbon into CO2 and these are called less oxidized explosives.

In such explosives, reaction products release oxygen into the atmosphere as they grow freely. While doing so, these

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 456

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 01 | Jan 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

products combine with oxygen and can burn to produce CO2.

This second reaction is part of a process known as afterburn.

methods used to obtain the expected estimate of the explosive influences on structures.

The relative amount of oxygen in a blowout is therefore a vital factor in identifying the nature and performance of explosive products; it is expressed in the plural as an oxygen balance. The heat produced by an oxygen-free explosive (for instance trinitrotoluene (TNT)) is inferior to that produced by explosive coatings that entirely oxidize.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

J. M. Dewey (1971) presented the influence of circular TNT (trinitrotoluene) and explosion waves and determined the density during flow using the Lagrangian preservation of the equation used to calculate the pressure in terms of the adiabatic flow of each air object in the middle of the shock.

The temperature and noise level obtained by pressing and compressing, taking into account the international gas balance.

The study and analysis of the explosive atmosphere began in the 1960s. In the United States, the US Department of Defense released a 1959 technology textbook “Resistance to Traumatic Structures” in 1959. Revised edition of the TM 5-1300 (1990) manual used extensively by the military and civil society to design buildings to restrict the spread of explosions and to come up with safety for personnel and essential equipment.

M. V. Dharaneepathy et al. (1995) presented the distance effect on long-range shells of varying lengths, performed with the aim of studying the effect of distance (earth-zero range) in the explosion response. The prime function in an explosion-resistant construction is to get accurate predictions of explosive pressure. The explosion distance from the structure is an essential base, which controls the size and length of the explosion loads.

The following are the methods available in predicting the effects of explosions on buildings e.g.

3. EXPLOSION AND BLAST PHENOMENON



Art (or analytical) techniques



Methods of mental rehabilitation



Calculation methods

In general, blasts are the results of the speedy liberating of massive measure of energy into a restricted space. Blasts can be ordered on the grounds of their inclination, for example, physical, atomic and synthetic occasions.

Blasts: -Energy can be removed from terrible disappointment of a compacted gas chamber, volcanic ejection or a blend of two fluids at different temperatures.

Solidarity methods are actually related to test data. Nearly all of these methods are restricted to the size of the test data domain. The efficiency of all the dynamic figures decreases as the blast event approaches the field. The precision of the guesswork is often superior to that given by the construction methods.

Atomic blasts: - The energy produced from the arrangement of different nuclear components by the redistribution of protons and neutrons inside the internal work core.

The type of explosion is mostly considered as

The calculation methods (or rule-first) are drawing on statistical estimates that explain the fundamental laws of physics that govern the problem. These principles comprise saving momentum, power and size. Moreover, the physical character of the material is defined by the performance relationship. Origin of explosions involves gas, explosives, nuclear material, and dust. The primary characteristics of the blast and blast wave phenomena were introduced together with a discussion of the equality rules of TNT (trinitrotoluene) and the rules of magnifying the blast. The overloading features of the event caused by atomic weapons, high-powered explosives and unconventional cloud detonations are corrected following the description of other explosive loading devices related with air flow and display process. Fertice G. conducts substantial architecture and explosion loads.

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

Blow air



High explosion



Under the blast



Earthquake



Explosions

The conversation at this stage is dictated by the breeze impact or the ground impact. This data is likewise used to recognize weighty burdens in underground structures under such dangerous tension and legitimate plan. It ought to be noticed that the nearby structure can't be monitored from direct besieging by an atomic bomb; can be intended to withstand dangerous weight where it is arranged at a range from the impact territory.

Alexander M. Remennikov (2003) studied the methods to predict the effects of bombings on buildings, when a single building is placed under an explosive load generated by the explosion of a high explosive metal. Simple analytical

© 2021, IRJET



The overwhelming activity of an atomic weapon is unquestionably more serious than a customary weapon and

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 457

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 01 | Jan 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

is because of blast or frenzy. In an exemplary breeze blower at an elevation of under 100,000 ft. the assessed power dispersion will be half blast and stun, 35% warm radiation, 10% remaining radiation and 5% essential atomic radiation (J.M. Dewey, 1971).

As the expansion precedes, the excessive stress before the shock decreases sharply; the background pressure does not stay the same, but rather, it falls in the normal way. The front of the explosion waves slow down as it rises, and its speed falls toward the sound wave in an uninterrupted area as shown in Fig. 3.

An abrupt arrival of energy triggers pressure on the climate, referred to as a stun wave as appeared in Fig. 1. While detonating, an expansion in warm gases produces pressure on the close by air. As the wave shifts from the center of the impact, the inner part goes through the district that was previously squeezed and is currently warmed by the main aspect of the wave. As the weight waves travel at the speed of sound, the temperature is around 3000-4000 degrees Celsius and the weight is around 300 kg bar of air which causes this speed to develop. The inside aspect of the wave starts to travel quicker and gradually arrives at the main aspect of the waves. After a brief time, the weight of the wave gets sudden, accordingly his lower arm stun precisely looks like Fig. 2. Inordinate pressure happens before stun and is called top overpressure. After a past stun, the weight drop is exceptionally low to right around an enormous aspect of the high weight and remains nearly the equivalent in the center district of the blast.

Fig. 3 Overpressure variation with distance 3.1 Explosive Air Blast Loading A typical bomb threat is described by two equally important factors, the size of the bomb, or the weight of the W charge, and the intermediate distance (R) between the source of the explosion and the intended target (Figure 4).

For example, an explosion occurred in a room below the World Trade Center in 1993 with a charging weight of 816.5 kg TNT. The 1995 Oklahoma bomb weighs 1814 kg at 5m.

Since a terrorist attack is likely to result from a bomb of a small truck to a hundred trucks as is the case in Oklahoma City, conventional blasting equipment and its target targets needed to be addressed. All through the pressure profile, two primary classifications can be seen; the upper aspect of the encompassing is known as the positive aspect of the length (td), while the lower some portion of the surrounding is known as the negative aspect of the length (td). The negative stage is longer and has less force than the positive time. As the stop separation builds, the length of the positive stage blast rate increases prompting a higher, longer abundancy rise. Charges nearest to the proposed structure force a solid, high-pressure load on the inherent locale; significant distance cases produce low, long, uniform weight at the whole structure.

Fig. 1 Pressure variation with distance

Burst Height (HOB) Blast height refers to air raids. The exact distance between the explosive weapon in the air and the container.

Fig. 2 Shock front formation in a shock wave

Š 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 458

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 01 | Jan 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

various stacking conditions and occasions that cause postage blast. ANSYS AUTODYN is a proficient and simple to-utilize instrument for recreating firecrackers and stacking impacts that interface it to the seat climate. Unstable recreation kept on being utilized by the JWL as a state comparable to hazardous materials. The two steel structures of the Store confronted a similar charge charges and deadlock separations to get comparative yield boundaries, deviations and joint reaction utilizing the SAP2000. From the current investigation the accompanying ends are drawn.

Fig. 4 Blast loads on a building At the point when outside building dividers can withstand the blast load, the safeguard enters windows and open entryways, including floors, roofs, dividers, substance, individuals, abrupt weights and pieces from broken windows, entryways, and so on. Materials that can't withstand a blast will separate and become more divided and driven by solid weight that promptly follows the past stun. The substance and development of individuals will be taken out from homes and fallen when the waves emit. In this manner the blast will spread all through the structure.

1.

The blast of a structure causes the arrangement of a high response in the joints prompting a breakdown of the joints and a total breakdown of the structure.

2.

The investigation of the steel segment in the ANSYS Dynamics clear plainly expresses that the impact of the blast is to a great extent subject to the separation and the heaviness of the charging.

3.

The most extreme contortion is gotten by the greatest accusing load of a similar stalemate run as appeared in the diagram.

4.

The AUTODYN rating gave a decent chronicled gauge of the time span of the positive and negative visual stage.

REFERENCES

3.2 Blast Wave Scaling Laws

[1].

A. Khadid et al. (2007), “Blast loaded stiffened plates” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 2(2) pp. 456-461.

[2].

A.K. Pandey et al. (2006) “Non-linear response of reinforced concrete containment structure under blast loading” Nuclear Engineering and design 236. pp.993-1002.

[3].

Alexander M. Remennikov, (2003) “A review of methods for predicting bomb blast effects on buildings”, Journal of battlefield technology, vol 6, no 3. pp 155-161.

[4].

American Society for Civil Engineers 7-02 (1997), “Combination of Loads”, pp 239-244.

W is usually expressed in pounds.

[5].

ANSYS Theory manual, version 5.6, 2000.

Measurement rules provide a cross-linking between a specific explosion and a standard charge of the same object.

[6].

Biggs, J.M. (1964), “Introduction to Structural Dynamics”, McGraw-Hill, New York.

[7].

D.L. Grote et al. (2001), “Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain rates and pressures”, Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 25, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 869-886, 10. IS 456:2000 Indian Standard Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice.

All impact boundaries rely to a great extent upon the measure of energy delivered by the explosion as an impact wave and the good ways from the impact. An overall portrayal of the all-inclusive impact of the blast can be given by estimating the separation comparative with (E/Po) 1/3 and estimating the weight comparative with P0, where E power is delivered (kJ) and P0 surrounding pressure (generally 100 kN/m2). For effortlessness, nonetheless, it is a typical practice to indicate a fundamental information or a W-charge as a proportionate measure of TNT. The outcomes are then introduced as the greatest capacity boundary work, Scaled Distance (Z) = R/W1/3 Where, R is the actual active distance from the blast.

4. CONCLUSION It is drawn from literature that the assessment of the blast of burden or weight in the fine art (Kinney and Graham's) shows that it is right as the blast is intricate in nature. Trouble emerges because of startling charging weight and halting separation, execution of products under

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 459

[8].

[9].

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 08 Issue: 01 | Jan 2021

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

BIOGRAPHIES

J.M. Dewey (1971), “The Properties of Blast Waves Obtained from an analysis of the particle trajectories”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A.314, pp. 275-299.

Sakshi Bhatia currently pursuing M.E in Structural Engineering from Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India. She received his B. Tech degree in Civil Engineering from Sri Sai University, Palampur, H.P, India. His area of interests includes Retrofitting, Composite Structures, Concrete.

J.M. Gere and S.P. Timoshenko (1997.), “Mechanics of materials”, PWS publishing company, Buston, Massachusetts, 66.

[10]. Kirk A. Marchand, Farid Alfawakhiri (2005), “Blast and Progressive Collapse” fact for Steel Buildings, USA. [11]. M. V. Dharaneepathy et al. (1995), “Critical distance for blast resistance design”, computer and structure Vol. 54, No.4. pp. 587-595.

[12]. Nelson Lam et al. (2004), “Response Spectrum Solutions for Blast Loading”, Journal of Structural Engineering, pp 28-44.

[13]. P. Desayi and S. Krishnan (1964), “Equation for the stress-strain curve of concrete”. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 61, pp 345-350.

[14]. Unnikrishnan Pillai and Devdas Menon (2003), “Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata McGraw-Hill.

[15]. Schmidt, Jon A. (2003), “Structural Design for External Terrorist Bomb Attacks”, STRUCTURER magazine, March issue.

[16]. S. Unnikrishnan Pillai and Devdas Menon (2003), “Reinforced Concrete Design”, Tata McGraw-Hill, pp 121-196.

[17]. T. A. Rose et al. (2006), “The interaction of oblique blast waves with buildings”, Published online: 23 August 06 © Springer-Verlag, pp 35-44.

[18]. T. Borvik et al. (2009) “Response of structures to planar blast loads – A finite element engineering approach” Computers and Structures 87, pp 507– 520.

[19]. TM 5-1300(UFC 3-340-02) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1990), “Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., (also Navy NAVFAC P200-397 or Air Force AFR 88-2.

© 2021, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 7.529

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 460