Power System Stability Using Unified Power Flow Controller

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Power System Stability Using Unified Power Flow Controller Sonal M. Adhau1, Dinesh D.Majumdar2 Electrical Engineering Department ,Shri Sai College of Engineering & Technology Bhadrawati, Electrical Engineering Department ,Shri Sai College of Engineering & Technology Bhadrawati, Maharashtra (India).

---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract - UPFC is one of the most widely used FACTS

devices. To control (Kw) and (Kvar) in power system FACTS devices are usually used. In this paper case study of 9 bus system is considered under the three phase to ground fault in MATLAB Simulink. Active power, reactive power and rotor angle, angular speed during the fault is analyzed.

Key Words: MATLAB-Simulink, UPFC

2. ASSUMPTION IN TRANSIENT STABILITY I) Mechanical input given to the synchronous generator will be constant.

II) Effect of damper winding can be neglected.

III) The voltage at generator and at the bus are assumed to be constant.

IV) Angular velocity of synchronous machine will be assumed as constant.

1.INTRODUCTION In recent year the technology is advances so that transmission network reliable and easy to design. There are many technologies in interconnected power system such as, HVDC and EHVAC. On other side as power system network grow, the interconnected network become increasingly more composite to operate and system can be less protected for riding through the major outages. The power system interconnected network of today is large and complex. There is widely use of microelectronic, computers and high speed communication for control and protection of present interconnected system. The main purpose of FACTS is to improve system controllability and to increase power system bound by using power automated devices.

Generally, FACTS devices are more expensive than HVDC devices. In case study consists of 3 generators nine bus system having three load and three transformer. The single line diagram of nine bus system as shown in fig. 1.It is simple diagram of power system to analyzed dynamic behavior and also power oscillation damping. In this system three phase fault is occurs at bus 8.Duration of fault time is 4 to 4.1 sec.

After 4.1 sec. the fault is remove system try to maintained stability, also active power, reactive power and bus voltage of different buses is calculated.

The UPFC consists of two branches. The series branch consists of a voltage source converter, which injects a voltage in series through a transformer. The inverter at the input end of the UPFC is connected in shunt to the AC power system and the inverter at the input end of the UPFC is connected in series with the AC transmission circuit. © 2016, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 4.45

|

Fig.1 Single Line Diagram of 9 Bus System

Single line diagram consist of 9 bus power system having generator, load, transformer and transmission line having length 50km. UPFC is connected between buses 7 and 5. Three phase to ground fault takes place at near to the bus no.4. Duration of fault is 0.1 sec.

After 4.1 sec. the fault is removed.

The main constraint in a power system i.e. line impedance (XL), terminal voltage (Vt) and rotor angle (δ). The performance of system is studied and damping of the oscillation in rotor angle (δ) and angular speed (dw) is investigated in the three machine of nine bus system.

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 1445

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

3. UPFC Static power electronics device consist of capacitor and inductor etc. are used for compensation. So after introduction of FACT devices give a control on the compensation. FACT devices like STATCOM, SVC, and SSSC.

output of the PLL is used to calculate the direct axis and quadrature axis component of the three phase voltage and current. Measurement system measured the Vd and Vq component of ac positive sequence voltage and current which can be measured as well as the DC link voltage Vdc.

The UPFC can control the transmission real power, at its series-connected output end, while independently providing reactive power support to the transmission line at its shunt connected input end. It is to control the flow of KW and KVAR by inoculation of a voltage in series with the transmission line. Magnitude of voltage and the phase angle of the voltage can be diverse independently.

An outer parameter loop comprising of an AC voltage regulator and DC voltage regulator. The output of the ac voltage regulator is the ref. current Iqref for the current regulator. The o/p of the DC voltage regulator is the ref. current Idref for the current regulator. The current regulatory control the magnitude phase of voltage generating by the pulse width modulation inverter.

To optimize the cost and optimum use of transmission line compensation is needed, which can either, compensate the voltage, phase shift, or both the increase of voltage and phase shift, and real and reactive power enhancement. Before the introduction of static power electronics device, fixed capacitor, inductor etc. are used for compensation over which control could not be done, .So some controller should need to be used which can give both series and shunt compensation.

5. SSSC (Static Synchronous Series Compensator)

4. STATCOM (Static Synchronous Compensator)

V1

AC Voltage Measurement

Vac - +

Voltage Measurement

P+

Vd Voltage Regulation

V1

I

PLL

ᶿ

PQ Measurement

Qref Q+

Current Measurement

-

Vq Voltage Regulation Voltage injection

VSC pulse

Vref I

Pref V2

ᶿ

Vdref Vd

PWM Modulation Vq

auto

Vqref

V1dq

AC Voltage Regulator

I Id

VSC

PLL

current Measurement

Vdc

Vdc - +

DC Voltage Measurement

Vdcref Pulse

PWM Modulator

Iq

Current Regulator

V2q

It controls the series branch which is different from the SSSC. In the SSSC the two degree of freedom of the series converter is used to control the DC link voltage and reactive power. In case of a UPFC the two degree of freedom is used to control the active power and the reactive power.

DC Voltage Regulator

-

V2d

Fig.3 Schematic Diagram of series inverter

Iq

+

Iqref

+ -

Idref

Id V1dq

Fig.2 Schematic Diagram of STATCOM

The shunt converter worked as STATCOM. The shunt inverter controls the ac voltage and voltage of dc bus. It uses a two voltage parameter loop inner current control loop and outer loop regulating AC and DC voltages. The control system contains: A phase-locked loop which synchronizes on the positive sequence component of the three phase primary voltage V1 . The © 2016, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 4.45

|

The series inverter may operate either in power flow control the measured active power kw and reactive power kvar are compared with value to produce Pref and Qref. The P and Q error are used by two P.I. regulators to calculate the Vq and Vd component of voltage to be manufactured by the VSC.

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 1446

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

6. SIMULINK MODEL

Q B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 (Mvar) 1600 1400

REACTIVE POWER

1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 -200

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

20

Fig.6 Reactive Power of Bus no.4 Without UPFC 4 Bus 4 Bus 5 Bus 6 Bus 7 Bus 8 Bus 9

3.5

3

Bus Voltage (pu)

2.5

Fig.4 Simulation Diagram of 9 Bus with UPFC System

2

1.5

1

7. SIMULATION RESULT 0.5

The MATLAB simulation result of the power system is shown in the figure given below. The three phase to graund fault takes in between 4 to 4.1 sec. After 4.1 sec the fault is removed. Also Active Power, Reactive Power and Bus Voltage are analyzed.

0

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

Fig.7 Bus voltage without UPFC w1 w2 w3 (pu) 1.015

P B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 (MW) w1 w2 w3 (pu)

2500

2000

1.005 1 0.995

1500

0

2

4

6

8

10 Vt1 Vt2 Vt3 (pu)

12

14

16

18

20

0

2

4

6

8

10 d_theta1_2 (deg)

12

14

16

18

20

1.5 Vt1 Vt2 Vt3 (pu)

ACTIVE POWER

M/C 3 M/C 2 M/C 1

1.01

1000

1

0.5

0

500

2

-500

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

20

Fig.5 Active Power of Bus no.4 without UPFC

© 2016, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 4.45

M/C 3 M/C 2

30 20 10

d heta1

0

t

(deg)

40

0

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

20

Fig.8 Angular Speed, Generator voltage and Rotor Angle without UPFC.

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 1447

20

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

P B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 (MW) w1 w2 w3 (pu)

2500 w1 w2 w3 (pu)

1.015

1500

1.01 1.005 1 0.995

0

2

4

6

8

1000

10

12

14

16

18

20

12

14

16

18

20

12

14

16

18

20

Vt1 Vt2 Vt3 (pu) 1.5 Vt1 Vt2 Vt3 (pu)

ACTIVE POWER

2000

500

0

1 0.5 0

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

0

2

4

6

8

10 d_theta1_2 (deg)

20 40 (deg)

-500

t

d heta1

2

Fig.9 Active Power of Bus no.4 with UPFC Using PI controller

30 20 10 0

Q B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 (Mvar)

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

1600 1400

Fig.12 Angular Speed, Generator voltage and Rotor Angle With UPFC Using PI controller

REACTIVE POWER

1200 1000 800

8. CONCLUSIONS

600

From comparative study of the relative variation in rotor angle and angular speed of the three machines nine-bus system is analyzed. Also active power and reactive power of bus is done. By using a UPFC we obtain better transient stability performance than the case without a UPFC.

400 200 0 -200

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

20

9. APPENDIX

Fig.10 Reactive Power of Bus no.8 With UPFC Using PI controller

MACHINE RATINGS Vpos. seq.

4 Bus 4 Bus 5 Bus 6 Bus 7 Bus 8 Bus 9

3.5

Sr. no

Generator

Transformer

1

247.5MVA/16.5KV

250MVA,16.5Kv/230k V

2

163.2MVA/18 kV

165MVA,18Kv/230kV

3

85MVA/13.8 kV

110MVA,13.8Kv/230V

3

Vpos. seq.

2.5

2

1.5

1

REFERENCES

0.5

0

0

2

4

6

8

10 Time

12

14

16

18

20

Fig. 11 Bus Voltage with UPFC

[1] N.G. Hingorani, L.Gyugyi

“Understanding FACTS: concepts an technology of flexible AC transmission systems”, New York. 2000.

[2] Tsao-Tsung Ma Member IEEE, Ming-Han Lee ,” Novel Damping Control Schemes Using the Unified Power Flow

© 2016, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 4.45

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 1448

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395 -0056

Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Controller and Fuzzy Theory” PEDS 2009 MIAOLI6003, TAIWAN. [3] S. Prabaharan, M Lakshmanan ,” Enhancement of Transient Stability in a 9 Bus System using Matrix Converter Based UPFC ”, International Journal of Science and Research Volume, April- 2014.

[4] H. Rafiq, Salman Shakeel, Saleem N. Muhammad, K. Bashir,” Control System Design of UPFC for Optimal Power Flow Control ”, International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies 2013.

[5] Gyugyi L., “Unified Power Flow Control Concept for Flexible AC Transmission Systems,” IEEE Proceedings, vol.

139, July 1992.

[6] P.Kumkratug,P.Laohachai, “Direct Methods of Transient Stability assessment of Power System with a SSSC”,Journal of Computer 2007.

[7] I.Papic , P.Zunko, D.Povh,”Basic Control of Unified Power Flow Controller,” IEEE Trans. On Power System,Vol.12, no.4 Nov.1997.

[8] Kannan, Sreenivasachar, S.Jayaram, M.M.A. Salama, “Dynamic Stability Improvement of Multi-machine Power System with UPFC”, Electric Power Systems Research,Vol.55, No-1, pp.27-37, 2000.

© 2016, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 4.45

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 1449