“A PARAMETRIC EVALUATION OF TWIN TOWER STRUCTURE HAVING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONNECTION VARIATIONS”
Thakor Vishalkumar Sureshbhai1, Aakash R. Suthar2
Abstract - Modern structures have extremely integrated and multi-functional architectural designs. A multi-towerisagroupoftwotallbuildingsthatarelinkedto each other. Due to the numerous high-rise construction projectsthathavebeencompleted,structuraldevelopment in the metropolis has rapidly increased. The fundamental process in designing a high-rise building with the same heightandgeometryisstructuralanalysis.Itispreferableto choose high structures if the horizontal dimension of the constructionfieldisdecreasing.Athighverticaldimensions, there is always an issue because of the cantilever action, wind loads, and seismic loads. To make the structure resistantto all these kinds offorces while making it more rigidandstableforthewindandseismicloads,theideaof the"MULTI-TOWERWITHLINK"wasdeveloped.Structure without connected beams and structure with connected beam.Inthiswork,theanalysisofG+28(85.98m)andG+24 (75m)highriseandmediumrisetwintowersconnectedat variousheightsandspansisstudied.Thegoalofthisstudyis to ensure that connecting beams in twin tower structures thataresubjecttolateralloadsareusedeffectivelyandare positionedperfectly.Themodelwillbeexaminedforstatic and dynamic conditions in this building, which is in Ahmedabad Zone III. The parameters like Storey Displacement,DriftandBaseSheartobestudiedinETABS software.Theeconomyandthemaximumdurabilitywere determined at connections, which are provided at 0.8 H + 5%distance(whereHrepresentstheheightofthebuilding). If the structures are parallel and close to each other, the reduction in displacement and drift is typically more significant,rangingfrom30%to40%.Ontheotherhand,if the structure are some distance apart but still parallel to each other, the reduction in displacement and drift is generallylower,around5%to10%.
Key Words: Twin tower, Connecting beams, Response Spectrum Analysis, Base shear, Storey displacement, Storey drift, ETABS.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1
General
Tosatisfytheneedsoftheurbanpopulation,developing nations are gradually converting to tall structure development. High-rise buildings now have a variety of exteriors and show dynamic behavior due to the
architecturaldesign,whichhasrecentlygrownmoreunique and outstanding [5]. Two single towers serve as the main structureofadoubletowerconnectedbuilding,whichisa complex architectural form connected by links like passageways[3].Theconnectingbodyisofferedataspecific heightandcreatesuniquestructuralsystemforabuilding.. High-riseconnectedstructureshavesimpleanddeveloped static performance. The location of the link will affect the dynamicpropertiesoftallstructuresandmaychangehow they react to loads such as earthquakes, wind, and other forces [3]. The type of connection chosen for the corridor affectsboththebehaviorofthestructureandthemembers ofthepassageway.
Serviceability requirements such story displacement, storydrift,andbaseshearinstaticanddynamicanalysisare the main criteria that the structures should be satisfy. Among the alternatives for satisfying the serviceability criteriainelevatedconstructionsistoprovideConnecting Beams(CB).Theideaofconnectingbeamsiskindofsimilar tothatofskybridges.Inthisstudy,theseparatetowersare to be connected by a link, or connecting beam, at specific floor levels depending on the requirements. It makes it easier for people and things to move about, typically betweenorwithotherbuildings.Duetotheriseinbuildings, theirattractiveaesthetics,andtherisingneedforadditional emergency exits, these structures, particularly those connectingbuildings,arecurrentlyenjoyingrapidgrowthin popularity[4].
HorizonDecksareacategoryofoverheadwalkwaythat often connects two or more buildings in an urban areas. They often connect train stations or other transportation withitsownfootbridgesandspanmanykminvariousAsian nations. Skyways often link the first few stories above groundlevel,butsometimestheyareconsiderablyhigher, like in the Malaysian Petronas Towers. Since retail businesses frequently occupy places in the structures connected by walkways, the area along the skyway may serve as a mall. Sky bridges connecting buildings are frequently seen in non-commercial regions with closely relatedstructures,suchasuniversitycampuses(Wikipedia, 2017)[6].
1.2 Definitions
Storey Displacement: Displacementisthechange inanobjectpositionrelativetoareferenceframe. Maximumdisplacementish/500.Wherehistotal heightofbuilding.
Storey Drift: It is the relative displacement betweenthefloorsaboveorbelowthestoreyunder consideration.
Base Shear (VB): Itisthehorizontallateralforcein theconsidereddirectionofearthquakeshakingthat thestructureshallbedesignedfor.
2. LITRTURE REVIEW
2.1
Paper No. 1
Name of Journal:: Journal of the Institution of Engineers(India)
Name of publisher: Springer,Oct2020
Title of Paper: AStudyoneffectofConnectingBeamsin aTwinTowerStructure
Author: Krishnam Raju Penumatcha, Ravindra Vipparthy,AmbikaYadav
Content:
Theaimofthisstudyistoensuresurethatconnecting beams in twin tower structures that are subject to lateral forces are used effectively and are positioned perfectly.Inordertoachievethis,athree-dimensional study of the twin buildings was conducted without inserting connecting beams between them and, in contrast, with connecting beams included at various floorlevels.Asaresult,eightoptionswerelookedinto, including the one without connecting beams that was subjecttoearthquakeandwind.Bothstaticanddynamic situation of the wind study, which included P-Δ effect with a basicwind speed of 50 m/sec and earthquake analysis in Zone II were done. The structure has 3 basementsandaG+14-storybuildingwitha20mx40m plandimension.Thelengthandwidthofthelinkare3m and3.4mrespectivelyandtheheightofthestructureis 54m.
Conclusion:
Earthquakeanalysis:-understaticanalysisiswithinthe permissible limit in all the eight alternatives but in dynamicanalysisAlt-5,6,7,8andAlt-1,2,3,4iswithin permissible limits and exceeded permissible limits respectively.Windanalysis: - Alt-8reduced21%lateral swaywithinthepermissiblelimitinstaticanalysisand exceed by 18% compared to its permissible limit in dynamicanalysis.
2.2 Paper No. 2
Name of Journal: International Journal of Civil EngineeringandTechnology(IJCIET)
Name of publisher: ScopusIndex,Nov2018
Title of Paper: SeismicResponseanalysisoflinkedtwin tallbuildingswithstructuralcoupling
Author: ImadShakirAbbood,MahirMahmod,AmmarN. Hanoon,MohdSalehJaafarandMohamedH.Mussa
Content:
Thisstudyusedfiniteelementmodellingtoexaminethe impactofstructurallinkagesonseismicresponsesfora connected building system. Twin 40-story reinforced concrete frame-wall constructions that are connected horizontally by structural linkages serve as the studyrepresentation of the linked building system. Analyzethe40storytwinbuildingwithconnectedbeam atdifferentlocation.Twofloorsareconnectedineach connection.Connectionofbuildingis15mspanand18 mwideatdifferentheight.ThestructurehasG+39-story buildingwitha75mx30mplandimension.Thelength andwidthofthelinkare15mand18mrespectivelyand theheightofthestructureis160m.
Conclusion:
Thestudydemonstratedthatthelinkwasmoreeffectual instrengtheningthesystemandreducingtheresponses wheninstalledatthelasttoptwofloors(Case4).The linkismosteffectiveinthestructureswheninstalledat approximately0.8ofthebuildingheight.
2.3 Paper No. 3
Name of Journal: JournalofEmergingTechnologiesand InnovativeResearch
Name of publisher: JETIR,June2020
Title of Paper: DynamicAnalysisofRegularTwinTall RCC Structure with Various Sizes of Links at Most EffectiveLocation
Author: VineshN.Bhinde,PratikA.Parekh,NarendraR. Pokar
Content:
Amulti-towerisa groupof twotall buildingsthatare linked to one another. It is preferable to use tall structures if there is a reduction in the horizontal dimensionofthebuildingsite.Instructureswithgreat vertical dimensions, there is constantly a difficulty because of cantilever action, wind loads, and seismic loads. To make the structure resistant to all of these kindsofforceswhilemakingitmorestiffandstablefor the wind and seismic loads, the idea of the "MULTI-
TOWER WITH LINK" was developed. Analyze the 40 story and 50 story twin structure. The connection of beam Links at 0.4H+0.8H, 0.6H+0.8H and 1.0H+0.8H Height.Link lengthis6mandwidthis6m,18m,30m. AnalysisdonewithZoneIVandV,Timehistorymethod and wind load analysis. The structure has G+39 and G+49storybuildingwitha66mx30mplandimension. Thelengthandwidthofthelinkare6mand6m,18m, 30mrespectivelyandtheheightofthestructureis140m and175m.
Conclusion:
Best location of Link is 0.6H+0.8H and the optimum widthis1.0Baccordingtostudyfor40storystructure. In50Storeyvaluesofshearanddisplacementarehigher inTimeHistoryAnalysis.
2.4 Paper No. 4
Name of Journal: InternationalJournalofEngineering Research&Science(IJOER)
Name of publisher: Academia,Nov2017
Title of Paper: ParametricAnalysisonBuildingswith ConnectingCorridors
Author: AfiyaVN
Content:
The term "irregular building frame system" refers to high-riseconstructionsthatareconnectedandconsistof primary towers and a passageway between them at a specificheight.ThestructurewasmodelledusingETABS software.Themodelswereexaminedusinglinearstatic and linear dynamic analysis. Storey displacements, storeydrifts,baseshearinthepassagewaybeamsare analyzed for seismic loading. Analysis of G+10 story twinstructureinstaticanddynamicanalysis.Buildingis connected at 2nd, 5th and 10th floor with 3m wide passage.Lengthof thebeam ordistance between two structures is 4m, 6m and 8m.The structure has G+9 storybuildingwitha24mx24msingleplandimension. Thelengthandwidthofthelinkare4m,6m,8mand3m respectivelyandtheheightofthestructureis30m.
Conclusion:
Whencomparedtoregularstructures,linkedbuildings have more complicated characteristics that vary dependingonwheretheconnectionismade.Thesetall, flexible structures move considerably in response to lateralstresseslikewindandearthquakes.Theresults indicate that the horizontal displacement and drift underseismicloadinginYdirectionislargerthanthe displacements and drifts in X direction. The effort to maximum base shear is larger in X direction than Y direction.
2.5 Paper No. 5
Name of Journal: International Advanced Research JournalinScience,EngineeringandTechnology
Name of publisher: IARJSET,May2020
Title of Paper: Dynamic Analysis of the Twin-Tower High-RiseStructurewithBasement
Author: JadavBhaveshBhanajibhai,N.B.Umravia
Content:
Duetothemultiplehigh-risebuildingprojectsthathave beencompleted,structuralgrowthinthemetropolitan areahasgrownrapidly.Inordertoconstructahigh-rise buildingwiththesameheightandgeometry,structural analysisisanessentialelement.Itisagoodoptionfor housing,buttherearesomedifficultissues,suchparking for cars and other requirements like common areas. Since this type of construction is frequently found in residentialandbusinesscomplexes,manyofthemoffer shared parking on one, many, or underground floors. Behaviors of structure G+20, G+25, and G+ 30 stories symmetrical twin tower without an underground basement, with 2 and 4 number of Basement. The analysis results obtained from all models were performed by using various linear dynamic structure analysis approaches such as Equivalent Static Force Method(ESFM),ResponseSpectrumMethod(RSM),and TimeHistoryAnalysis(Bhuj).
Conclusion:
Twin tower connected with the basement it has been observedthatwhenanalysisStructurewithincremental 5numberofstories(16mheight)inbothtowerand2 number (8 m depth) of common basement simultaneously. Its effect on the base shear has been increasing average 12-14% and 18-20% respectively. Themaximumbaseshearvalueisdirectlyimpactedby the basement depth. Because the twin tower height constructionsupportsthebasement.
3. RESEARCH GAP AND OBJECTIVES
3.1 Research Gap
Inpapers,thestructurallyoptimizedlocationoflink connectionisquiteunclear.
Thewidthoftheconnectionisbitambiguousinthe papersreferred.
Determinethegreatestdistancebetweenbuildings thatissafewithonelink.
Determinethebuildingspacingrequiredtosupport twoconnections.
Establishthespecificheightfortheconnection.
3.2 Objectives
Application of Load combinations according to IS codespecifications.
To analyze models in terms of Base shear, Storey displacementandStoreydrift.
HeightandLengthoftherequiredconnection.
Numbersofconnectionsthatarerequired.
Thedistancebetweentwoormoreconnections.
4. MODELING 4.1 Building Configurations
For the present study, 40 types of models have been selectedtodeterminetheeffectofdistanceandheight ontheconnections.Highriseandmediumrisebuildings are Model I & III and Model II & IV are taken, respectively.ThetotalheightofstructuralmodelsI,II, III and IV are 85.98m, 49.98m, 75.5m and 49.5m, respectively.ModelsIandIIarerealplans,whileModels III and IV are hypothetical plans. For a realistic plan, memberswithshearwallswiththicknessesof230mm, 250mm, 300mm, 350mm, 380mm, 410mm, 460 mm, and510mmareselected.Columnsizesare300x550mm, 300x690mm, 300x900mm, 410x1120mm, and 510x610mm;thewidthofthebeamsisaccordingtothe columnandshearwallwidth;theslabthicknessinthe 2nd basement, 1st basement, and typical floor is 250mm, 180mm, and 150mm, respectively. For a hypothetical plan Column size is 380x900mm, beams are 300x600mm and 380x600mm, slab thickness is 125mm,andshearwallsare300mmthick.
4.2 List of Models with Various Connections
4.2.3 Model 3 Realistic plan with 60% height + 10% distance connection of building
4.2.6 Model 6 Hypothetical plan with 40% height + 5% distance connection of building
Fig. 4 Model3Realisticplanwith60%height+ 10%distanceconnectionofbuilding
4.2.4 Model 4 Realistic plan with 80% height + 15% distance connection of building
Fig. 7 Model6Hypotheticalplanwith40%height +5%distanceconnectionofbuilding
4.2.7 Model 7 Hypothetical plan with 60% height + 10% distance connection of building
Fig. 5 Model4Realisticplanwith40%height+ 5%distanceconnectionofbuilding
4.2.5 Model 5 Hypothetic plan without any connections
Fig. 6 Model5Hypotheticalplanwithoutany connections
Fig. 8 Model7Hypotheticalplanwith60%height +10%distanceconnectionofbuilding
4.3 Data for Analysis of the Building
4.4 Material Property
Concrete: ForallcolumnM40andM50gradeand forbeamsM35andM40.
Steel: HYSD reinforcement of grade Fe500 confirmingtoIS:1786(2008)isused.
5 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
5.1
TheresultsfromtheE-tabmodelarediscussedinthis chapter.Analysisofthebuildingbaseshear,storeydrift inxandydirections,andstoreydisplacementinxandy directionsweredone.
5.1.1 Model Descriptions
Eachmodelhasbeennamedinthefollowingway:The modelnumberiswritteninformatofmodel-followed by roman number and alphabet.eg model IA .The Number I Indicate type of (High rise or Medium rise) building and the Alphabet an Indicate height and distanceoftheconnections.
J 80%oftotalheightof building 15%oftotalheightof building
oftotalheightof building 10%oftotalheightof building G 80%oftotalheightof building 15%oftotalheightof building
5.2.6 Comparison of Storey Drift in Model II
5.2.9 Comparison of Base (Storey) Shear in Model I
Chart-6 StoreyDriftinModelII
5.2.7 Comparison of Storey Drift in Model III
Chart-9 BaseShearinModelI
5.2.10 Comparison of Base (Storey) Shear in Model II
Chart-7 StoreyDriftinModelIII
5.2.8 Comparison of Storey Drift in Model IV
Chart-10 BaseShearinModelII
5.2.11 Comparison of Base (Storey) Shear in Model III
Chart-8 StoreyDriftinModelIV
Chart-11 BaseShearinModelIII
5.2.12 Comparison of Base (Storey) Shear in Model IV
o The base shear is an important parameter structural design that represents the total lateral forceappliedtoabuildingduringseismicorwind load.
o Inthehypotheticalplanisdeterminedthatthebase shearvaluecanbedoubledcomparedtoasingleor noconnectionlinks.
o Thissignificantincreaseinthebaseshearindicates that the lateral forces on the building in the hypotheticalplanaresubstantiallyhigher.
o Based on the above results, it appears if the twin towersareparalleltoeachotherandconnectedata distanceof0.8H+5%distance,thereisareduction in maximum displacement while simultaneously increasingthebaseshear.
6.2 Future Scope
• Wind dynamic analysis is an essential tool for understandingthebehaviourofstructure,including skybridges,subjectedtowindloads.
6
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
6.1 Conclusion
Results for high-rise and medium-rise structures withtwintowersarereportedinthisresearch.The building is built according to with IS code specifications,andthefindingsaboveresultsinthe followingconclusion:
o The maximum displacement for the type I A was 64.385 mm, whereas the maximum displacement for the models I J and I H was 66.281 mm and 59.633mm,respectively.
o According to the above outcomes, high-rise structures might have displacement increases of 2.95% and reduction of 7.38% respectively, if connectionsaregivenat0.8H+15%and0.8H+5% respectively.
o ThemaximumdisplacementforthetypeIIIAwas 75.22mm,whilethemaximumdisplacementforthe versions III D and III H was 67.65 mm and 43.05 mm,respectively.
o Based on the previous results, high-rise buildingdisplacementmaybereducedby10.06%if connections are supplied at a distance of 0.4H + 15% distance, and by 42.76% if connections are provided at a distance of 0.8H + 5% distance. Furthermore,itreducesby10to20%themaximum displacementinmediumrisestructures.
o Based on the above data, if the connection is providedatadistanceof0.8H+5%distance,there are potential benefits in terms of decreased maximumdrift.
o The realistic plan shows a decrease in maximum drift by 5 to 10%, while the hypothetical plan exhibitsadecreaseof30to40%.
o In a realistic plan, it is determined that the base shearvaluecanbeincreasedby1-2%.
• Modifyingtheshapeofthestructure,includingthe sky bridge can be optimized its response to wind loads.
• To comprehensively understand the behaviour of structure, it is beneficial to conduct studies by varyingearthquakeandwindcharacteristics.This includes different seismic zone, soil type, terrain categoriesandwindcondition.
• Expanding research to include different types of structure,suchassteelframeandshearwallwith flatslabstructurecanbeprovidevaluableinsights.
• Eachstructuralsystemrespondsdifferentlytowind and seismic loads and studying various types of structures allows for a comprehensive understandingoftheirbehaviour.
7 REFERENCE
1) Penumatcha,K.R.,Vipparthy,R.,&Yadav,A.(2020). A Study on effect of Connecting Beams in a Twin Tower Structure. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 101(4),847-856.
2) Abbood,I.S.,Mahmod,M.,Hanoon,A.N.,Jaafar,M. S.,&Mussa,M.H.(2018).Seismicresponseanalysis of linked twin tall buildings with structural coupling. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(11),208-219.
3) Bhinde, V. N., Parekh, P.A., Pokar, N.R. (2020). Dynamic Analysis of Regular Twin Tall RCC Structure with Various Sizes of Links at Most EffectiveLocation. JournalofEmergingTechnologies and Innovative Research (JETIR).
4) Afiya,V.N.ParametricAnalysisonBuildingswith Connecting Corridors. International Journal of Engineering Research & Science (IJOER)
5) Bhanajibhai, J. B., Umravia, N. B. (2020). Dynamic Analysis of the Twin-Tower High-Rise Structure
with Basement. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology (IARJSET).
6) AGARWAL,N.(2017). A STUDY OF LATERAL DRIFT CONTROL BY CONNECTING SKY BRIDGE BETWEEN TWO BUILDINGS (Doctoraldissertation).
7) SISODIA, R., Kiran, N. T., & Reddy, K. S. S. (2019). Analysis of a Multi-Tower Frame Structure connectedatdifferentlevelsusingETABS.
8) Hu, G., Tse, K. T., Song, J., & Liang, S. (2017). Performance of wind-excited linked building systems considering the link-induced structural coupling. Engineering Structures, 138,91-104.
9) IS-875-1987 (Part -3), Indian standard Code of Practice for Design loads, Bureau of Indian Standards,NewDelhi.
10) IS-1893(Part1):2016,IndianstandardCriteriafor Earthquake design Structure, Bureau of Indian Standards,NewDelhi.
11) IS-456-2000,PlainandReinforcedconcreteforcode ofPractice,BureauofIndianStandards,NewDelhi.