FORMWORK TECHNOLOGY IN HIGH-RISE BUILDING ITS COST AND QUALITY ANALYSIS

Page 1

FORMWORK TECHNOLOGY IN HIGH-RISE BUILDING ITS COST AND QUALITY ANALYSIS

1 Post Graduate Student, M. Arch – Construction Project Management, Faculty of Architecture, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Maduravoyal, Chennai

2 Head of the department, M. Arch – Construction Project Management, Faculty of Architecture, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Maduravoyal, Chennai

Abstract - This paper describes about the formwork technology used in high- rise building suitable for Indian construction. By utilizing new technologies in formwork, construction can now achieve the castingoflargerelementsin a single pour. This advancement not only minimizes time and labor needed but also outperforms conventional methods. Formwork technology is based on the cost, time,andqualityof project delivery. The study is about advantages of aluminium formwork and tunnel formwork with conventional system in terms of cost and quality analysis. Traditional approaches can’t keep up the demand of infrastructural facilities with high degree of quality control & assurance. Case studies with two different technology is done, its cost and duration are compared. This study is focusses on the two different conducted on a construction site in Chennai. Further, the real time cost duration and labor savings in the use of aluminium formwork is demonstrated in a G+21, 8 tower building.

Key Words: Aluminium formwork, cost, tunnel formwork, comparison of quality analysis, economy, time saving.

1. INTRODUCTION

Formwork in construction refers to the utilization of supportive structures and molds to shape concrete into desired structures. Concrete is poured into these molds, which can be constructed from various materials such as steel, wood, aluminum, or pre-made forms. A range of materialoptionsisavailableforconstructingtheformwork. The selection of formwork material is based on various factors,includingcost,projectrequirements,andthetypeof structure involved. This study is to compare conventional withaluminiumandtunnelspecificallyrelatedtohighrise building

1.1

TYPES OF FORMWORKS:

Timber has been the prevailing choice of material for formworkthusfar.Nonetheless,duetodiminishingforest reserves and escalating timber costs, the adoption of alternative materials like plywood and steel has gained prominence.Moreover,plasticsandfiberglasshaverecently emergedasviableoptionsforprefabricatingformwork.The selection of material depends on factors such as the construction'scharacteristics,materialavailability,andcost.

Additionally, project constraints such as overall cost and completiontimesignificantlyinfluencethechoiceofmaterial forformwork.Timber,SteelAluminum,Plastics,Fabricare commonmaterialsusedinformwork.Theformworkusedin high-riseconstructionaretimber,aluminiumformworkand tunnelformwork.

1.2 ALUMINIUM FORMWORK:

Theutilizationofanaluminumformworksystemenhances the construction's quality while simultaneously reducing bothtimeandcosts.Thecost-effectivenessoftheformwork becomes evident when it is utilized for numerous constructioncycles.Asaluminiumcanbeusedaround250 repetations. Theprimarydrawback ofaluminum forms is that once the formwork is manufactured, no changes can be made. The system typically operates on a four-daycycle,asoutlinedbelow:

Day 1 - The initial task involves erecting vertical reinforcementbarsandonesideoftheverticalformworkfor eitheranentirefloororaportionofafloor.

Day 2 - Thesubsequentstepentailserectingthesecondside of the vertical formwork and installing formwork for the floor.

Day 3 - Involvestheplacementofreinforcementbarsforthe floorslabandthecastingofwallsandtheslab.

Day 4 -Theverticalformworkpanelsareremovedafter24 hours, while the support props remain in place for seven days,andthefloorslabsformworkremainsinplacefor2.5 days.

Atunnelisaspeciallyfabricatedstructuremadeofstructural steel,designedintheshapeofanLandresemblingahalfroominsize.Itsprimaryfunctionistofacilitatetheseamless pouringofreinforcedconcrete(RCC)wallsandfloorslabs, allowingthemtoformaunifiedanduninterruptedstructure. Twohalftunnelsarecombinedtocreateafulltunnelwith dimensions equivalent to that of a room. This innovative approach ensures efficient construction with a focus on speed,quality,andprecisionwhileofferingtheadvantagesof

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 10 Issue: 05 | May 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.226 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page1749
***
1.3 TUNNEL FORMWORK:

on-siteconstruction,flexibility,andcost-effectiveness.The slabcycleforthissystemis24hours.However,itshouldbe notedthateachtunneliscustom-madeandhighlymodular, limitingthepossibilityofdesignchanges.

2. METHODOLOGY:

The study is to identify the different types of formworks usedinhigh-risebuilding.Theliteratureandnetstudyare done to collect data about the most efficiently used formworkinhigh-rise.Comparativestudyisdonebetween aluminium, tunnel and conventional formwork. For the proposedsitealuminiumformworkisimplemented,itscost, quality and time schedule analysis are done and the end results are compared with conventional formwork technology.

3. LITERATURE REVIEW:

The review of journal papers involves a comparison of different types of formwork for high-rise buildings. The study suggests that, in terms of cost and availability, aluminiumformworkiswell-suitedforconstructionsitesin India.Thisisduetoitsdesignflexibility,minimalmachinery usage, and the ability to utilize unskilled labor, despite havingfewerrepetitionscomparedtotunnelformwork.In contrast,tunnelformworknecessitatesheavymachinery,a significant initial investment, and skilled labor. Consequently, the aluminium formwork is economically advantageousforhigh-risebuildingprojectsinIndia

3.1 CASE STUDY 1:

The project involves the construction of a high-rise residential building on a 3.88-acre site, consisting of 6 towers,2basements,stilt,andG+21floors.Thetotalproject cost amounts to 218.72 crores, employing an aluminium formworksystem

Forthisproject,theshearwallsare200mmthick,whilethe non-shearwallsare10mmthick.Theformworkisfilledwith self-compacting concrete to fill the voids [4]. By utilizing thinner wall sections, the usable area is increased by approximately 5% through the adoption of shear wall systems.Additionally,maintenancecostsarereduceddueto improved quality and the elimination of brickwork and plaster [5]. All services are pre-planned, and the cost of constructionforonefloor,includingtheprovisionandlaying ofRCCM-30,self-compactingconcrete,steelreinforcement, andaluminiumformwork,amountsto44,00,258

The construction time schedule for each floor using the aluminiumformworksystemis620days.Thefloorcycleis4 daysperfloor,employingabox-typeframeworkstructure. The dimensional accuracy is high, and the surface finish allowsfordirectpaintingafter putty application.From an economic perspective, the fund flow associated with the aluminium formwork system is favorable. The waste productionwhenusingaluminiumformworkismoderate, andtheformworkcanberepeatedupto200times.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 10 Issue: 05 | May 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.226 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page1750
Figure1TunnelFormworkProcess
ACTIVITY CONVENTIONAL ALUMINIUM TUNNEL Capitalcost less Cost of shuttering material is high Cost of shuttering material and other related machinery is veryhigh Speed of work slow fast fast Accuracyand Quality of construction less Good accuracy Good accuracy Internal/exte rnal Plastering required required Notrequired Notrequired Cycle time of RCCwork 20days 10-15days 1 day with proper infrastructur e and other ancillary machineries No of repetition of shuttering material 12-15 200-250 500 Cost of shuttering Around Rs 400 to500/Sq.ftof shuttering floor area Around Rs 8000 to 10000/Sq.ft ofshuttering floorarea Around Rs 12,000 to 14,000/Sq.ft of shuttering floorarea

3.2 CASE STUDY 2:

Theprojectentailstheconstructionofahigh-riseresidential buildingona3.88-acresite,comprising3towerswithG+18 floors.ThetotalprojectcostamountstoRs.117,32,17,750, employingthetunnelformworksystem.

Consideringtheproject'slocationinthebustlingpremium residentialhubofChennaimetropolitancity,threedistinct unconventionalformworktechnologieshavebeenadopted to leverage their specific advantages [11]. While tunnel formworkallowsfortheconstructionoflarge,multi-story, andcellularstructures[9],theproject'scostincreaseddueto the utilization of expensive equipment and skilled labor. However, tunnel formwork lacks the design flexibility necessaryforincorporatingbasementfloorsinthetowers, making it less preferable for efficient high-rise building constructionwhencomparedtoaluminiumformwork.

4. PROJECT PROPOSAL:DOSHIRISINGTON:

continue for the remaining part of the tower, ensuring a profitableinitialinvestment..

The proposal for Phase 2constructioninDOSHI RISETON suggeststheutilizationofaluminiumformwork,asoutlined in the provided table. The conventional construction approach for Phase 2 involves approximately 10 towers, encompassing2basements,stilt,andG+21floors.

By adopting the aluminium formwork system, different designphaseswithineachtowercanbeefficientlyexecuted. Theestimatedtimedurationfortheconventionalmethodis around3years,whereasaluminiumformconstructionoffers theadvantagesofhigh-qualityconstruction,increasedspeed, and reasonable cost [5]. This technology holds significant potentialforaddressingIndia'sgrowingpopulation'sneed foraffordablehousing.

Moreover, the number of repetitions with aluminium formwork increases, making the initial investment more profitable [5]. Unlike the conventional method where the numberofrepetitionsislower,leadingtoanincreaseincost per square meter after the 16th floor slab cycle. This includes rising costs for shuttering formwork, brickwork, andplastering.Thebreakpointforthealuminiumformwork occurs after the 16th floor of the tower, and repetitions

Figure3CostAnalysis

Timeschedulefor1floorusingaluminumformwork: INSTALLATION OF ALUMINIUM OF PRE-CONCRETE ACTIVITIES

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 10 Issue: 05 | May 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.226 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page1751
Figure2SiteMap
SI.NO PROCESS DURATION (HOURS) 1 levelsurveys 5 2 settingoutdata 5 3 controlofdeviations 5 4 enforcementwallpanel 15 5 enforcementcolumn panel 5 6 enforcementstaircase panel 3 7 enforcementbeamlevel 10 8 enforcementslablevel 20 9 settingkickers 10 10 layoilatthepanel& kickers 9 ERECTION OF ALUMINIUM OF POST-CONCRETE ACTIVITIES 11 erectionwallandcolumn panel 10 12 erectionbeamandslab panel 15 13 clean,transportandstack panel 10 14 erectionofkickers 10 TOTALDURATION 132

The duration for 1 floor of 870 Sq.m is 132 hrs. using aluminiumformwork.Ittakesabout126daysapproximately tocompletetowerA.

Timeschedulefor1floorusingconventionalformwork:

formwork in future projects. Additionally, this approach helps minimize construction waste associated with formworkusage.

Althoughthealuminiumsystemformworkincursahigher initialcost,itdemonstratesitscost-effectivenesswhenthe number of repetitions falls between 150 and 200 in the constructionofhigh-rise buildings.Incontrast, employing contemporary conventional formwork, which is the least expensivetypeandrequiresmoretime,resultsinthehighest total expenditure. For the proposed site, utilizing conventional formwork leads to a 25% reduction in both costandtime.

6. REFERENCES

[1] Prof. Zen Raut, Mayur S. Meshram Analysis and ComparisonofMivanFormworkSystemwithConventional FormworkSystem

[2] Mayur Sanjay Lodha Comparative Analysis of Conventional Formwork and Mivan Formwork based on DurationandCost

[3]JayaSuryaREvaluationofDifferentKindsofFormwork SystemsinIndianConstructionIndustry

[4]DanishSadruddin Ansari,COMPARATIVESTUDIESOF CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES (CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUEVSALUMINIUMFORMWORKTECHNIQUES)

[5]Ar.SowndharyaANALYISINGADVANCEDFORMWORK SYSTEMFORHIGHRISEBUILDINGCONSTRUCTION

[6]LoganathanALUMINIUMFORMWORKSYSTEMUSINGIN HIGHRISEBUILDINGSCONSTRUCTION

[7]MissManikMoholkarProductivityAnalysisofBuilding Construction Using Mivan Formwork June 2019 | IJIRT | Volume6Issue1|ISSN:2349-6002

[8] Miss. Renuka Hangarge Comparison of Conventional, AluminiumandTunnelFormwork

[9] Vallabhy .S Advanced Technology for Speedy Construction(TunnelFormwork)

[10] Asst. Prof. A. R. Chavan A REVIEW ON FAST TRACK CONSTRUCTIONUSINGMODERNFORMWORKSYSTEMS

The duration for 1 floor of 870 Sq.m is 765 hrs. using conventional formwork. It takes about 651 days approximatelytocompletetower

5. CONCLUSIONS

The aluminium formwork presents a favorable option for achievingtimelycompletionofconstructionwithmaximum efficiency. Gathering information from literature and case studies will prove beneficial for selecting the appropriate

[11]Mr.ManasA.ShalgarIntroductiontoadvancedTUNNEL Formworksystem:Casestudyof‘Rohan-Abhilasha’

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 10 Issue: 05 | May 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.226 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page1752
ACTIVITIES
PROCESS DURATION (HOURS) 1 levelsurveys 15 2 settingoutdata 5 3 controlofdeviations 10 4 enforcementwall wood 150 5 enforcementcolumn wood 80 6 enforcementstaircase wood 60 7 enforcementbeam wood 75 8 enforcementslab wood 75 9 setting-upother components 100 10 layoilatthepanel& kickers 25 ERECTION OF CONVENTIONAL FORMWORK OF POST-CONCRETE ACTIVITIES 11 dismantlewood column 15 12 dismantlewoodwall 50 13 dismantlewoodbeam 20 14 dismantlewoodslab 40 15 dismantleother components 25
cleanupleftovers 20 TOTAL DURATION
INSTALLATION OF CONVENTIONAL FORMWORK OF PRE-CONCRETE
SI.NO
16
765

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
FORMWORK TECHNOLOGY IN HIGH-RISE BUILDING ITS COST AND QUALITY ANALYSIS by IRJET Journal - Issuu