Current Trends in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis and its Forensic Significance

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Current Trends in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis and its Forensic Significance Dr. Amandeep Kaur1*, Dr. Gurleen Kaur2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Science, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India 2Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Science, RIMT University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India

--------------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------------Abstract Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) stands as a pivotal discipline in forensic investigations, offering crucial insights into crime scene dynamics. This review explores the current trends shaping the field of BPA and its forensic significance. Beginning with a historical overview, the focus is on the fundamentals, covering diverse types of bloodstain patterns and their interpretation.

The paper emphasizes the evolution of methods and techniques, ranging from traditional approaches to cutting-edge technologies, including 3D modeling and virtual reality simulations. Highlighting the challenges and limitations in interpretation, discussions revolve around the forensic implications of BPA in crime scene reconstruction, underscored by case studies showcasing its integral role in solving crimes. Legal considerations and the admissibility of BPA evidence in court are examined, shedding light on the intersection of science and the legal system. Furthermore, the review explores the training and certification landscape for bloodstain pattern analysts, emphasizing the importance of standardized practices. Concluding with a glimpse into current research and future directions, this paper provides a comprehensive understanding of the dynamic field of bloodstain pattern analysis, underscoring its continuous evolution and critical role in modern forensic science.

Keywords: Bloodstain pattern analysis; Forensic investigations; Crime scene dynamics; 3D modeling; Legal considerations; Forensic science;

Introduction Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) holds significant importance in forensic investigations, providing investigators with a unique and invaluable tool to reconstruct crime scenes and decipher crucial details about the events that transpired [1].

Understanding the significance of BPA requires a recognition of its multifaceted contributions to the field of forensics [2]. The roots of bloodstain pattern analysis can be traced back to the mid-20th century when Dr. Paul L. Kirk pioneered systematic approaches to studying bloodstains [3]. Initially, observations were largely anecdotal, and the methods were rudimentary. Over time, however, the discipline evolved as scientific rigor and technology advanced. Traditional techniques, such as stringing and grid methods, paved the way for more sophisticated approaches. The historical evolution of BPA reflects a gradual transition from subjective interpretations to objective and scientifically grounded methodologies.

BPA serves as a key component in the forensic toolkit by offering insights into the dynamics of violent incidents [4]. The patterns left by blood at a crime scene can reveal critical information, including the type of force applied, the direction of bloodshed, and the potential movements of individuals involved [5]. This analysis contributes to the reconstruction of events, aiding investigators in establishing timelines, identifying key actors, and validating or challenging witness statements [6]. In cases where conventional evidence may be limited, bloodstain patterns can become a primary source of information, making BPA an indispensable forensic science [7].

The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive examination of the current trends in bloodstain pattern analysis, encompassing its historical development, fundamental principles, evolving methodologies, forensic significance, legal implications, training requirements, and ongoing research. By synthesizing information from various aspects of BPA, the review aims to offer a holistic understanding of the field, serving as a resource for forensic professionals, researchers, and those seeking insights into the intricate world of bloodstain pattern analysis.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 748

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Fundamentals of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) relies on a nuanced understanding of fundamental concepts and terminology to decipher the narrative imprinted in bloodstains at crime scenes [8]. Deep knowledge in this area is essential for forensic analysts as they navigate the intricate world of bloodstain interpretation [9].

In BPA, key concepts form the foundation for accurate analysis. Understanding the source of the blood, the forces acting upon it, and the mechanisms of its dispersal is paramount [10]. The terminology encompasses terms such as “origin,” referring to the point in three-dimensional space where the blood was released, and “impact spatter,” denoting bloodstains produced when force is applied to a liquid blood source [11]. Equally critical are terms like “satellite spatter” and “back spatter,” which describe the secondary patterns resulting from the initial impact [12]. Additionally, recognizing the distinction between passive, transfer, and impact patterns is crucial. Passive patterns result from the force of gravity, as seen in blood drops falling directly to a surface [13]. Transfer patterns occur when a wet, blood-bearing surface comes into contact with another, leaving a trace of blood. Impact patterns, often central to crime scene reconstruction, are created when force is applied to a blood source, producing characteristic spatter patterns [14].

Types of Bloodstain Patterns Bloodstain patterns serve as silent witnesses at crime scenes, providing crucial insights into the dynamics of violent incidents.

Understanding the various types of bloodstain patterns is essential for forensic analysts as they unravel the narrative encoded in these stains [15]. Here, we explore the distinct characteristics of three primary types of bloodstain patterns: passive, transfer, and impact patterns.

1. Passive Bloodstain Patterns: Passive patterns result from the force of gravity acting on blood without the influence of additional forces [16]. The most common example is the classic vertical drop of blood from a bleeding individual. Passive patterns are integral for determining the position and movement of the victim or the source of blood [17]. For example- Drip stains, pool stains, and flow patterns are common examples of passive bloodstain patterns. Drip stains form when blood drops directly to a surface, while pool stains occur when blood accumulates in a pool on a horizontal surface. Flow patterns arise when blood moves in a specific direction due to the force of gravity [18].

Figure 1: Passive Blood stains pattern [19].

2. Transfer Bloodstain Patterns: Transfer patterns occur when a wet, blood-bearing surface comes into contact with another surface, leaving a trace of blood.

These patterns provide evidence of contact between the victim, suspect, or an object and a surface [20]. Transfer stains are crucial for establishing connections between individuals or objects and specific locations within a crime scene [21]. For

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 749

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

example- Swipe patterns result from a bloody object moving across a surface, leaving a linear pattern. Contact stains occur when a bloody object directly contacts a surface, creating a discernible imprint.

Figure 2 Transfer stain/patterns in Fabrics [19].

3. Impact Bloodstain Patterns: Impact patterns are created when force is applied to a liquid blood source, producing characteristic spatter patterns [22].

These patterns are fundamental for reconstructing the dynamics of a violent event, providing information about the nature and direction of the force applied [23]. Impact spatter can be categorized into high-velocity and low-velocity patterns based on the force of impact. For example- High-velocity impact spatter often appears as fine mist and is associated with high-force events such as gunshot wounds [12]. Low-velocity impact spatter exhibits larger droplets and is typically seen in events with less force, such as blunt force trauma [24].

Figure 3: Example of a bloodstain impact pattern with a detailed photograph of a single bloodstain. (a) Impact pattern created by means of a hammer on spring released into a volume of blood. (b) Schematic representation of the directional angle γ and the impact angle α of a single bloodstain (red ellipse). (c) A single elliptical bloodstain of which the tail shows the direction of travel [25]

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 750

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Advancements in Technology The integration of technology in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) has witnessed significant advancements, particularly with the incorporation of 3D modeling and virtual reality simulations. 3D modeling plays a pivotal role in enhancing the precision of crime scene reconstruction [26]. By utilizing specialized software and capturing multiple perspectives of bloodstain patterns, analysts can create three-dimensional representations that offer a more nuanced understanding of the spatial relationships between bloodstains and other scene elements. In tandem with 3D modeling, virtual reality simulations have emerged as a powerful tool for forensic investigators [27]. Virtual reality environments allow analysts to immerse themselves in recreated crime scenes, enabling a more immersive and interactive examination of bloodstain patterns [28]. This approach enhances the analyst’s ability to visualize the dynamics of blood spatter in complex scenarios, facilitating a more comprehensive analysis of the crime scene [29]. The application of technology extends to the development of software tools specifically tailored for BPA. These tools incorporate algorithms that aid in the automated identification and analysis of bloodstain patterns [30]. Machine learning algorithms, for example, can process vast amounts of data to identify patterns that may be imperceptible to the human eye, contributing to a more exhaustive analysis [31].

Moreover, the integration of various imaging techniques has significantly bolstered the accuracy of BPA. Technologies such as Luminol and Bluestar, which enhance bloodstain visibility, are often coupled with 3D modeling and virtual reality simulations to provide a multi-faceted approach to scene reconstruction[32]. These technologies not only aid in the identification of bloodstains but also contribute to a more detailed understanding of the temporal aspects of the crime, allowing analysts to differentiate between primary and secondary spatter patterns [33]. While these technological advancements in BPA offer unprecedented insights, challenges persist. Standardization of 3D modeling and virtual reality protocols is crucial to ensure consistency and reliability across analyses [34]. Additionally, the integration of technology demands a high level of expertise, emphasizing the need for specialized training programs to equip analysts with the skills required to navigate and interpret the digital landscape of bloodstain patterns[35].

Use of advanced imaging techniques The use of advanced imaging techniques, such as Luminol and Bluestar, has significantly enhanced bloodstain detection in forensic investigations[36]. Luminol, developed by chemist Walter Specht in the early 20 th century, revolutionized the field by enabling the visualization of bloodstains not easily detectable by the naked eye[37]. The chemical reaction involves the oxidation of luminol in the presence of blood, producing a blue luminescence that persists for several seconds[38]. This reaction amplifies the visibility of even minute blood droplets and allows investigators to identify bloodstains on various surfaces, including those that have been cleaned or diluted[39].

Bluestar, another critical advancement, was introduced by French researcher Louis Bluestein in the late 1990s. Building upon the principles of Luminol, Bluestar employs a chemiluminescent compound that reacts with hemoglobin in blood, producing a blue glow[40]. What distinguishes Bluestar is its increased sensitivity and prolonged luminescence compared to Luminol. This enhancement allows for better documentation of bloodstain patterns and facilitates the analysis of crime scenes under diverse conditions[41].

Previous research on these techniques has explored their effectiveness in different scenarios. Studies have investigated the impact of environmental factors, such as ambient light and surface composition, on the reliability of Luminol and Bluestar[42].

Researchers have also focused on optimizing the concentrations of these reagents to maximize sensitivity while minimizing background interference[43]. The evolution of these techniques has involved continuous refinement, addressing limitations identified through rigorous scientific inquiry[44]. In practical terms, both Luminol and Bluestar have been instrumental in crime scene investigations, helping forensic analysts identify bloodstains that might otherwise go unnoticed[45]. These techniques have been particularly useful in cases where attempts to clean or conceal blood evidence have been made[46].

However, it is crucial to note that while these methods are powerful tools, they are not without limitations. False positives and the potential to compromise DNA analysis are among the challenges that researchers and forensic professionals continue to address[47].

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 751

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Challenges and Limitations Interpretation challenges and limitations in bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) are integral aspects that forensic analysts must carefully navigate to ensure accurate and reliable conclusions[48]. One significant challenge lies in the complexity of bloodstain patterns encountered at crime scenes. These patterns can result from a myriad of factors, including the type and velocity of the impacting force, the surface characteristics, and the environmental conditions[49]. Deciphering the interplay of these variables demands a nuanced understanding of physics and biology, making the interpretation of certain patterns inherently intricate[50].

Moreover, potential sources of error in BPA stem from both external and internal factors. External factors may include the disturbance of bloodstains post-deposition, environmental contamination, or the presence of multiple blood sources[51].

Internally, limitations arise from the inherent variability in blood characteristics and the potential for spatter overlap[52].

Current methodologies, while advanced, may face challenges in distinguishing between patterns generated under different conditions, contributing to the complexity of accurate interpretation[53].

Limitations in BPA methodologies also extend to the subjective nature of pattern interpretation. Analysts must rely on their expertise and experience, introducing an element of subjectivity that could impact the consistency of results[54].

Standardization in terminology and methodology has been introduced to mitigate this issue, but challenges persist in achieving a universally accepted framework[55]. Additionally, the reliance on technology, while advantageous, may introduce limitations related to equipment sensitivity, calibration, and accessibility, influencing the precision of analysis[56].

Forensic Significance and Legal Implications of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) Bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA) plays a pivotal role in crime scene reconstruction, offering valuable insights into the events that transpired during a criminal incident[57]. By scrutinizing bloodstain patterns, forensic investigators can decipher critical aspects such as the direction, angle, and force of impacts, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the crime[58]. In cases involving violent crimes, BPA serves as a crucial tool for reconstructing sequences of events, shedding light on the dynamics between victims and perpetrators[59].

Several high-profile cases exemplify the forensic significance of BPA[8]. One such case is the “O.J. Simpson murder trial” (19941995), where BPA played a central role in reconstructing the sequence of events surrounding the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman[60]. The analysis of bloodstain patterns helped establish the positioning of individuals involved, contributing to the overall narrative presented in court[61]. The forensic significance of BPA extends beyond elucidating crime scene dynamics; it also aids in corroborating or refuting witness testimonies[62]. In the “Michael Peterson trial” (2003), where the accused was charged with the murder of his wife, Kathleen Peterson, BPA provided crucial evidence contradicting the initial explanation of her death as a fall down the stairs. The bloodstain patterns observed were inconsistent with a simple fall, supporting the prosecution’s argument of foul play[63].

However, despite its utility, the admissibility of BPA evidence in court is subject to rigorous legal scrutiny. Courts require a demonstration of the scientific validity and reliability of the methods employed in BPA[64]. The Daubert standard, which assesses the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence, has been a benchmark in determining the admissibility of BPA in several jurisdictions[65]. In the “State v. Castagnola” (2002) case, the court emphasized the importance of ensuring that BPA methods are scientifically sound and based on accepted principles.

Legal considerations also extend to the qualifications and expertise of the analyst presenting BPA findings[66]. The analyst must possess appropriate training and certification, and their testimony should adhere to established scientific principles[67].

Failure to meet these standards may result in challenges to the admissibility of BPA evidence, as seen in the “People v. Duran” (2000) case, where the court scrutinized the analyst’s qualifications and adherence to scientific standards.

Conclusion In conclusion, this review has delved into the dynamic field of bloodstain pattern analysis (BPA), exploring its foundational principles, methodological advancements, and forensic significance. The fundamental understanding of bloodstain patterns, ranging from passive to impact patterns, forms the basis for forensic investigators’ insights into crime scenes. The integration

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 752

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

of traditional methods and cutting-edge technologies, such as 3D modeling and advanced imaging techniques, has elevated the precision and scope of BPA. However, challenges in interpretation and the acknowledgment of limitations underscore the importance of ongoing research and refinement in methodologies. The forensic significance of BPA in crime scene reconstruction and the legal implications of its findings highlight its indispensable role in solving criminal cases. As we navigate the complexities of bloodstain pattern analysis, training programs and certification standards emerge as crucial components to ensure the competence and reliability of analysts. Looking ahead, ongoing research endeavors and future developments promise to further enhance the field, underscoring the continuous evolution of BPA techniques. In essence, this review encapsulates the multifaceted nature of BPA, emphasizing its pivotal role in forensic investigations while acknowledging the need for perpetual refinement and innovation in the pursuit of justice.

References 1.

2.

Taupin, J. M., & Cwiklik, C. (2010). Scientific protocols for forensic examination of clothing. CRC Press.

Stotesbury, T., Bruce, C., Illes, M., & Hanley-Dafoe, R. (2016). Design considerations for the implementation of artificial fluids as blood substitutes for educational and training use in the forensic sciences. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal, 7(3-4), 81-86.

3. Walton, R. H. (Ed.). (2006). Cold case homicides: Practical investigative techniques. CRC Press.

4. Edition, T. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis.

5. Peschel, O., Kunz, S. N., Rothschild, M. A., & Mutzel, E. (2011). Blood stain pattern analysis. Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 7, 257-270.

6. Beebe, N. L., & Clark, J. G. (2005). A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process.

Digital Investigation, 2(2), 147-167.

7. Attinger, D., De Brabanter, K., & Champod, C. (2022). Using the likelihood ratio in bloodstain pattern analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(1), 33-43.

8. Fraser, J. (2020). Forensic science: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

9. Bettison, A., Krosch, M. N., Chaseling, J., &scrutinizing bloodstain patterns, forensic investigators can decipher critical aspects such as the direction, angle, and force of impacts, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the crime.

10. Larkin, B. A. J. (2015). Bloodstain pattern analysis: scratching the surface (Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University).

11. Wonder, A. Y. (2015). Bloodstain patterns: identification, interpretation and application. Academic Press.

12. Millington, J. (2016). Bloodstain Pattern Analysis.

13. Parker, M. A., Sneider, S. L., Smithey, S. A., Benecke, M., & Byrd, J. H. (2019). Entomological alteration of bloodstain evidence. In Forensic Entomology (pp. 399-411). CRC Press.

14. Wonder, A. Y. (2015). Bloodstain patterns: identification, interpretation and application. Academic Press.

15. Koen, W. J., & Bowers, C. M. (Eds.). (2016). Forensic science reform: protecting the innocent. Academic Press.

16. Tripathi, S., Kumar, Y. B. V., Prabhakar, A., Joshi, S. S., & Agrawal, A. (2015). Passive blood plasma separation at the microscale: A review of design principles and microdevices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 25(8), 083001.

17. Brown, R. E., Hawkes, R. I., Parker, M. A., & Byrd, J. H. (2000). Entomological alteration of bloodstain evidence.

Entomological Evidence: Utility of Arthropods in Legal Investigation.

18. Laan, N., Smith, F., Nicloux, C., & Brutin, D. (2016). Morphology of drying blood pools. Forensic science international, 267, 104-109.

19. Bandyopadhyay, Samir & Sk, Bandyopadhyay. (2016). Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access Investigation Process Observed By Bloodstain Pattern Analyst from Examining Murder Scene.

20. Zannin, A. (2017). Bloodstain Pattern Analysis. In Veterinary Forensics (pp. 73-108). CRC Press.

21. Gardner, R. M., & Krouskup, D. (2018). Practical crime scene processing and investigation. CRC Press.

22. Boos, K., Orr, A., Illes, M., & Stotesbury, T. (2019). Characterizing drip patterns in bloodstain pattern analysis: An investigation of the influence of droplet impact velocity and number of droplets on static pattern features. Forensic science international, 301, 55-66.

23. Damelio, R., & Gardner, R. M. (2001). Bloodstain pattern analysis: with an introduction to crime scene reconstruction.

CRC press.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 753

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

24. SWEET, M. (2006). Bloodstain pattern analysis. Evidence In: Traffic Crash Investigation and Reconstruction: Identification, Interpretation and Analysis of Evidence and Traffic Crash Investigation and Reconstruction Process.

Charles Thomas Publisher Ltd. Springfield, Illinois, 62-3.

25. Laan, N., de Bruin, K. G., Slenter, D., Wilhelm, J., Jermy, M., & Bonn, D. (2015). Bloodstain pattern analysis: implementation of a fluid dynamic model for position determination of victims. Scientific reports, 5(1), 11461.

26. Colwill, S. (2016). Low-cost crime scene mapping: reviewing emerging freeware, low-cost methods of 3D mapping and applying them to crime scene investigation and forensic evidence (Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University).

27. Ma, M., Zheng, H., & Lallie, H. (2010). Virtual reality and 3D animation in forensic visualization. Journal of forensic sciences, 55(5), 1227-1231.

28. Elhaw, A. E., & Alshehhi, D. J. (2024). Using Virtual Reality in (Investigating-Simulating-Reconstructing) the Crime Scene. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(5s), 530-555.

29. Miles, H. F. (2014). Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Developing quantitative methods of crime scene reconstruction through the interpretation and analysis of environmentally altered bloodstains (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)).

30. Joris, P., Develter, W., Jenar, E., Suetens, P., Vandermeulen, D., Van de Voorde, W., & Claes, P. (2015). HemoVision: An automated and virtual approach to bloodstain pattern analysis. Forensic science international, 251, 116-123.

31. Zemblys, R., Niehorster, D. C., Komogortsev, O., & Holmqvist, K. (2018). Using machine learning to detect events in eyetracking data. Behavior research methods, 50, 160-181.

32. Doty, K. C. (2017). Raman Spectroscopy and Chemometrics for Forensic Bloodstain Analysis: Species Differentiation, Donor Age Estimation, and Dating of Bloodstains. State University of New York at Albany.

33. Hołowko, E., Januszkiewicz, K., Bolewicki, P., Sitnik, R., & Michonski, J. (2016). Application of multi-resolution 3D techniques in crime scene documentation with bloodstain pattern analysis. Forensic science international, 267, 218227.

34. Elangovan, U. (2021). Industry 5.0: The future of the industrial economy. CRC Press.

35. Tymoshenko, Y. P., Kozachenko, O. I., Kyslenko, D. P., Horodetska, M. S., Chubata, M. V., & Barhan, S. S. (2022). Latest technologies in criminal investigation (testing of foreign practices in Ukraine). Amazonia Investiga, 11(51), 149-160.

36. Morrison, J., Watts, G., Hobbs, G., & Dawnay, N. (2018). Field-based detection of biological samples for forensic analysis: Established techniques, novel tools, and future innovations. Forensic Science International, 285, 147-160.

37. Mojela, N. L. Synthesis and application of Ag-nanoparticles from local plant extracts for detection of'BLOOD'at crime scenes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg).

38. Quinones, I., Sheppard, D., Harbison, S., & Elliot, D. (2007). Comparative analysis of luminol formulations. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 40(2), 53-63.

39. Barni, F., Lewis, S. W., Berti, A., Miskelly, G. M., & Lago, G. (2007). Forensic application of the luminol reaction as a presumptive test for latent blood detection. Talanta, 72(3), 896-913.

40. Khunoana, S. (2019). Plant Components as Low-Cost Alternatives to Luminol for the Detection of Blood at Crime Scenes. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).

41. Osborne, N. K., Taylor, M. C., Healey, M., & Zajac, R. (2016). Bloodstain pattern classification: Accuracy, effect of contextual information and the role of analyst characteristics. Science & Justice, 56(2), 123-128.

42. McCall, K., Woods, G., & Richards, E. (2021). Detecting Blood in an Outdoor Environment with the Bluestar Reagent and DNA Analysis. Journal of Forensic Identification, 71(4), 309-328.

43. Chiu, M. L., Lawi, W., Snyder, S. T., Wong, P. K., Liao, J. C., & Gau, V. (2010). Matrix effects—a challenge toward automation of molecular analysis. JALA: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation, 15(3), 233-242.

44. Shapiro, S. L., Shapiro, D. E., & Schwartz, G. E. (2000). Stress Management in Medical EducationTable 1. A Review of the Literature on Stress Management in Medical Education, 1969 to 1998Table 1. Continued. Table 1. Continued. Table 1.

Continued. Table 1. Continued. Table 1. Continued.: A Review of the Literature. Academic medicine, 75(7), 748-759.

45. Kennedy, K. (2022). Refinement and Validation of Multi-Source Blood Detection for Operational Use. Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom).

46. Gershman, B. L. (2003). Misuse of scientific evidence by prosecutors. Okla. City UL Rev., 28, 17.

47. Murrie, D. C., Gardner, B. O., Kelley, S., & Dror, I. E. (2019). Perceptions and estimates of error rates in forensic science: A survey of forensic analysts. Forensic science international, 302, 109887.

48. Wiid, A. B. (2016). The use of blood pattern analysis to reconstruct a crime scene (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 754

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 12 | Dec 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

49. Ross, A. M., Jiang, Z., Bastmeyer, M., & Lahann, J. (2012). Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity. Small, 8(3), 336-355.

50. Button, C., Seifert, L., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Araujo, D. (2020). Dynamics of skill acquisition: An ecological dynamics approach. Human Kinetics Publishers.

51. Peter, R., Pizzola, P. A., & Kammrath, B. W. (2021). Blood Traces: Interpretation of Deposition and Distribution. John Wiley & Sons.

52. Reynolds, M. (2008). Bloodstain Size Shape and Formation (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA).

53. Shen, C. (2018). A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists.

Water Resources Research, 54(11), 8558-8593.

54. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health services research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.

55. Marszal, A. J., Heiselberg, P., Bourrelle, J. S., Musall, E., Voss, K., Sartori, I., & Napolitano, A. (2011). Zero Energy Building–A review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and buildings, 43(4), 971-979.

56. Mautz, R. (2012). Indoor positioning technologies.

57. Pandita, R. (2020). Bloodstain pattern analysis: The identification and evaluation of reusable surfaces for the reconstruction of BPA events (Doctoral dissertation, Murdoch University).

58. Kuras, C. M. (2016). Dead men do tell tales: An examination of the forensic science field and criminological applications (Doctoral dissertation, University of West Georgia).

59. Moza, B., Mukherjee, D., & Verma, P. (2023). Blood Stain Pattern Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Methods, Reliability of Computerized Analysis, and Future Advancements. Sciences, 1(1), 5-10.

60. Menzyk, A. (2021). Toward a spectroscopy-based approach for estimating time elapsed since bloodstains deposition: Development of a novel framework for blood evidence evaluation.

61. Wonder, A. Y. (2015). Bloodstain patterns: identification, interpretation and application. Academic Press.

62. Kaiser, A. (2016). Sex/gender matters and sex/gender materialities in the brain. Biopolitics: Medicine, Technoscience, and Health in the Twenty-First Century.

63. Edition, T. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis.

64. Hicklin, R. A., Winer, K. R., Kish, P. E., Parks, C. L., Chapman, W., Dunagan, K., ... & Busey, T. A. (2021). Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts. Forensic Science International, 325, 110856.

65. Hall, L., Iles, A., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2012). Litigating Toxic Risks Ahead of Regulation: Biomonitoring Science in the Courtroom. Stanford environmental law journal, 31(1), 3.

66. Bettison, A., Krosch, M. N., Chaseling, J., & Wright, K. (2021). Bloodstain pattern analysis: Does experience equate to expertise?. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 66(3), 866-878.

67. National Research Council. (2011). Reference manual on scientific evidence. National Academies Press.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 755