"The Impact of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Learning Styles in the Creative Design Proce

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

"The Impact of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on Learning Styles in the Creative Design Process" Prof.R.V.Deshmukh1, Prachi D. Bobhate2, Prajwal M. Nerkar3, Prajwal S. Ghatol4, Prajwal S. Belsare5, Pranjali A. Wankhede6 1Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, JCOET Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India 2,3,4,5,6Under Graduation Student, Department of Computer Engineering, JCOET Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India

---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------journey to explore the intricate interplay between AR, VR, Abstract

and diverse learning styles within the realm of creative design processes, uncovering the impact of these immersive technologies on the multifaceted landscape of education. The evolution of education has been characterized by a constant quest to tailor instructional methods to the varying needs of learners. Learning styles, reflecting individual preferences for receiving and processing information, have become pivotal in designing effective educational experiences.

Within the sphere of creative design processes, learners span a wide spectrum of learning styles, from visual learners who thrive on imagery to kinesthetic learners who excel through hands-on experiences. Traditional teaching methods, often confined to static lectures and two-dimensional textbooks, face challenges in catering to these diverse learning preferences. It is within this context that AR and VR technologies emerge as potential game changers.

Augmented Reality, through its ability to overlay digital content onto the physical world, has the potential to revolutionize how learners engage with their surroundings.

By seamlessly integrating computer-generated elements into real-world environments, AR offers an unprecedented immersive experience that resonates with visual learners and enhances spatial understanding. The allure of tangibly interacting with augmented objects creates an environment that transcends the confines of traditional pedagogy, inviting learners into an active role in their education. On the other hand, Virtual Reality introduces learners to entirely new digital realms, where their sensory perceptions are skillfully manipulated to create synthetic environments. Within these immersive landscapes, learners have the potential to traverse time, space, and disciplines. VR facilitates a form of experiential learning that profoundly appeals to kinesthetic learners, who benefit from hands-on encounters with complex concepts. By enabling the manipulation of digital objects in three dimensional space, VR encourages creative exploration and experimentation that mirrors the processes inherent to creative design itself. As the digital generation comes of age, the divide between the virtual and the real world becomes increasingly blurred. AR and VR technologies reflect this evolution by presenting learning environments that intersect with students' everyday experiences. With an affinity for digital mediums and interactive engagement, modern learners are well poised to embrace the potential of AR and VR as educational tools. This research paper seeks to

This research explores how Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) can change the way we learn design.

We're in a time where technology is changing education, and we want to see how AR and VR can help people learn about creative design. We start by looking at different ways people like to learn and how that can help us teach better. Then, we dive into AR and VR to see how they create fun and interactive learning. We check what other people have already learned about this to build our ideas. We test AR and VR by asking people questions and watching them use these technologies. This helps us see what works best for different learners. We also talk to people to understand their experiences, finding out what's good and what's not so good about using AR and VR. What we find is that AR and VR can help all sorts of learners in design classes. These technologies make learning more exciting and help people remember things better. They let students play with ideas like they're real, even though they're in a virtual world. But using AR and VR in design classes can be tricky. Sometimes, it's hard to use the technology, and not all students might have access to it. Teachers need to change how they teach to fit with AR and VR. In the end, our research shows that AR and VR can make design classes better. They help all kinds of students learn in cool new ways. As AR and VR become more common in schools, teachers and others can use them to make learning about design more fun and helpful for everyone.

Key Words: Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Learning styles, Design education, Creativity.

1.INTRODUCTION In recent years, the landscape of education has been undergoing a profound transformation through the integration of cutting-edge technologies. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) have emerged as frontrunners in this technological revolution, presenting novel opportunities to reshape the way knowledge is imparted and acquired. This paradigm shift is particularly relevant in the context of creative design education, where the fusion of artistic expression and technical skill necessitates innovative pedagogical approaches. This research paper embarks on a

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 651

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

understand how these technologies bridge the gap between traditional educational paradigms and contemporary learning preferences, particularly within the context of creative design processes. The potential of AR and VR to cater to diverse learning styles is paralleled by their capacity to redefine the boundaries of creative design education.

Creative disciplines demand an integration of theory and practice, an intricate dance between artistic vision and technical prowess. The spatial, interactive, and experiential nature of AR and VR align with these demands, offering learners a playground for experimentation and innovation that mirrors the dynamic processes of creative design.This paper, therefore, embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the impact of AR and VR on learning styles within creative design education. By unraveling the intricacies of how these technologies interact with diverse learning preferences, this research aims to provide educators, instructional designers, and policymakers with insights into crafting holistic and engaging educational experiences.

Through an amalgamation of theoretical foundations, empirical analysis, and critical discussions, this research seeks to illuminate the transformative potential of AR and VR within the realm of creative design processes.

immerses the user inside a computer-generated environment where the user cannot relate to the physical environment, AR allows the overlaying of virtual elements onto the physical environment. AR can be considered a hybrid of virtual and physical environments and therefore supplements reality rather than replacing it. Given the similarities and overlapping of certain characteristics between these two interfaces (AR and VR), there is a critical need to identify advantages or disadvantages of one over the other for its use in a specific domain. AR is an interface that offers tangible interaction (Ishii, 2007) and is often referred to as tangible user interface (TUI). There for the tangible nature of AR might appeal to AR/VR Learner preferences Creative Design Process Technology Acceptanace VARK Learning Style Inventory • Visual • Auditory • Read/Write • Kinesthetic Page | 57 kinaesthetic users as compared to the visual nature of VR, which might appeal more to the visual learners. Even though AR has existed for several decades, there is a gap in the knowledge about how human factors affect the use of AR (Huang, Alem, & Livingston, 2012).

Better understanding of user experience factors in AR environments is important for a number of reasons. With the emergence of new hardware that has the capability of supporting AR applications, interest in how to use this technology efficiently has been increasing. Such studies are only currently becoming feasible because of the recent maturation of the technology. Extensive studies of this type will allow the development of specific and general design and usage guidelines for AR technology not only in design education and design practice but in other fields of study as well. Moreover, understanding human perception of AR will accelerate the introduction of such technologies into mainstream use beyond the current novelty value of AR.

3. History Augmented Reality (AR): AR's roots can be traced back to the 1960s when computer scientists began experimenting with overlaying digital information on the real world. However, AR gained prominence in the 1990s when researchers like Boeing and NASA started using it for training and simulation purposes.

Over the years, AR has become more accessible through smartphone apps and wearable devices, allowing it to find applications in fields like gaming, education, and industrial training.

2.Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) VR has been extensively used in educational environments.

As AR technology is becoming more accessible, it is being more often adapted for mainstream use. While VR can generally be interpreted as an immersive three-dimensional computer-generated environment, AR can be thought of as overlaying of the virtual over the physical environment. VR is a simulated three dimensional environment which either emulates the real world or acts as an imaginary world. Even though the majority of virtual environments cater to the visual sense, virtual environments can cater to the auditory, haptic, olfactory, and even the taste sense. VR is commonly used as an entertainment, education, and research tool. It offers a wide variety of options and opportunities in conducting research, especially in human behaviour research, since virtual environments can be controlled according to the need of the researcher. AR has been defined as a variation of VR (Azuma, 1997). While VR completely

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

Virtual Reality (VR): VR has its origins in the 1950s, primarily as a concept in science fiction. The term "virtual reality" was coined in the 1980s when researchers began developing technology to immerse users in computer-generated environments. The early VR systems were bulky and expensive, limiting their use. However, with advancements in technology and the introduction of consumer VR headsets like the Oculus Rift in

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 652

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

the 2010s, VR has gained popularity in gaming, entertainment, healthcare, and education.

5.2 Relevance of Learning Styles in Education: Understanding learners' individual preferences is vital in creating effective educational experiences. When instructional strategies align with learners' styles, it enhances comprehension, engagement, and motivation. For instance, visual learners grasp information best through visual aids like diagrams, charts, and videos, while auditory learners benefit from spoken explanations and discussions.

Kinesthetic learners thrive in hands-on activities that involve movement and practical application. By recognizing and accommodating these differences, educators can foster a more inclusive and personalized learning environment.

4.Difference Between AR and VR Aspect

Augmented Reality (AR)

Virtual Reality (VR)

Environment

Real-world environment with digital overlays.

Completely simulated, immersive digital environment.

Interaction

Interaction with both real and virtual objects.

Interaction with entirely virtual objects

Visibility

Can see the real world along with virtual objects

Cannot see the real world, fully immersed in virtual environment

Hardware

Typically uses smartphones, tablets, AR glasses

Requires VR headsets, sensors, and controllers

Immersiveness

Partial immersion in the real world

Full immersion in a virtual environment

Example

Pokémon Go (mobile app), Snapchat filters

VR games, simulations, training programs

Navigation, gaming, education, retail

Gaming, simulations, virtual tours, training, therapy

Use Cases

5.3 Augmented Reality and Learning Styles: The integration of Augmented Reality (AR) into education holds promise in catering to diverse learning styles. AR overlays digital information onto the real world, allowing learners to interact with virtual elements within their physical environment. Visual learners can benefit from visualizations and interactive simulations, while auditory learners can engage with audio cues and explanations.

Kinesthetic learners can manipulate virtual objects and engage in hands-on learning experiences. AR's ability to bridge digital and physical realms creates opportunities for various learning preferences to be addressed simultaneously, enhancing engagement and retention.

5.4 Virtual Reality and Multimodal Learning: Virtual Reality (VR) provides a unique opportunity to immerse learners in entirely virtual environments. This technology is particularly beneficial for accommodating multimodal learners who exhibit a combination of learning styles. VR environments can be designed to incorporate visual, auditory, and kinesthetic elements, catering to a wider range of preferences. For instance, a VR design workshop can allow learners to visualize concepts in 3D, hear explanations, and physically interact with virtual prototypes. This immersive nature of VR enhances experiential learning, enabling learners to explore complex design concepts in interactive and multisensory ways.

5. Learning Styles and Educational Context 5.1 Understanding Learning Styles: Learning styles refer to the diverse ways in which individuals acquire, process, and retain information. These styles encompass cognitive, emotional, and physiological factors that shape how learners engage with educational content.

Researchers and educators have proposed various frameworks to categorize learning styles, including the VARK model (Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, Kinesthetic), the Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (Concrete Experience, Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualization, Active Experimentation), and the Felder-Silverman model (Sensing/Intuitive, Visual/Verbal, Active/Reflective, Sequential/Global), among others. Each of these frameworks provides insights into learners' preferences and tendencies, offering educators a basis for tailoring instructional approaches.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

5.5 Implications for Creative Design Education: Creative design processes necessitate a multifaceted approach that encompasses visual ideation, spatial reasoning, and hands-on experimentation. Given the diverse demands of creative design, addressing different learning styles becomes particularly crucial. AR and VR technologies offer educators the means to create dynamic and interactive learning environments that resonate with individual preferences. By aligning these technologies with various learning styles, educators can cultivate a more holistic and effective pedagogical experience in creative design education.

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 653

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

6. Augmented Reality and Creative Learning

that aligns with their preferences, leading to improved comprehension and knowledge retention.

The integration of Augmented Reality (AR) technology into the realm of creative design education has sparked a new wave of innovative learning experiences. AR offers a dynamic approach that caters to various learning styles, providing immersive and interactive encounters that resonate with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners alike.

By overlaying digital elements onto the real world, AR transforms the learning environment into a captivating canvas where students can engage with design concepts in novel ways. Visual learners benefit from AR's ability to visualize abstract ideas, allowing them to see and understand complex design principles more effectively.

Through interactive 3D models and visual simulations, AR bridges the gap between theoretical concepts and practical application, fostering a deeper understanding of design processes. Auditory learners engage through AR enabled audio enhancements, offering verbal cues and explanations that complement visual components. This convergence of visual and auditory stimuli facilitates a multisensory learning experience that enhances comprehension and retention. Moreover, kinesthetic learners find AR particularly advantageous as it facilitates hands-on exploration. AR allows them to physically interact with virtual design elements, manipulating objects and experimenting with spatial arrangements. This experiential learning approach empowers kinesthetic learners to grasp design concepts by actively engaging in the creative process.

Ultimately, AR fosters a learning environment where diverse learning styles converge, enriching creative design education with immersive experiences that cater to individual preferences. In the broader context of the impact of AR on creative learning, this paper further investigates the correlation between AR technology and the various learning styles present within the realm of creative design processes.

Through empirical analysis and critical assessment, the paper endeavours to unravel the intricate ways in which AR enhances the learning journey of creative design students.

3.Experiential Learning: These technologies enable learners to manipulate virtual objects, experiment with design concepts, and engage in simulations that mirror real-world scenarios. This hands-on approach fosters experiential learning, allowing students to learn through direct interaction and exploration.

4.Bridge Between Theory and Practice: AR and VR dissolve the boundaries between theoretical concepts and practical application. Learners can visualize abstract ideas in tangible ways, translating theoretical knowledge into practical design skills seamlessly.

5.Customized Learning: Educators can tailor AR and VR experiences to cater to individual learning needs. This customization ensures that learners receive content and activities that align with their strengths, preferences, and areas for growth.

Challenges: 1.Technical Barriers: The adoption of AR and VR requires access to suitable hardware, software, and reliable internet connections. This can be a hindrance for institutions and learners lacking the necessary resources.

2.Learning Curve: The initial learning curve for mastering AR and VR tools can be steep, posing challenges for both educators and students who are unfamiliar with these technologies.

3.Accessibility:

Benefits:

Ensuring equitable access to AR and VR experiences for all learners, including those with disabilities, remains a challenge. Creating inclusive experiences that consider diverse needs is essential.

1.Enhanced Engagement:

4.Pedagogical Adaptation:

AR and VR technologies captivate learners' attention by providing immersive, interactive, and visually appealing experiences. This heightened engagement leads to increased motivation and active participation, crucial for effective learning within creative design processes.

Educators must adapt their teaching methods to effectively integrate AR and VR into their curricula. This involves designing activities that leverage the strengths of these technologies and align with learning objectives.

7. Benefits and Challenges

5.Ethical and Privacy Concerns:

2.Catering to Diverse Learning Styles:

As AR and VR may collect personal data or blur the boundaries between real and virtual worlds, Ethical considerations related to privacy, data security, and consent must be addressed.

AR and VR accommodate various learning styles, such as visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and multimodal, by offering a range of sensory experiences. Learners can choose the mode

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 654

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

6.Content Quality:

6.Ethical Considerations:

Designing high-quality, engaging, and relevant AR and VR content requires careful planning and resources. Poorly designed content can hinder learning experiences.

Given the immersive nature of AR and VR, ethical concerns around data privacy, content appropriateness, and the potential for addiction need to be addressed. Future research should examine these ethical implications and develop guidelines for responsible use in education.

7.Overreliance on Technology: There's a risk that learners might become overly reliant on AR and VR, potentially neglecting foundational skills or realworld experiences that are essential for comprehensive learning. Balancing these benefits and challenges is crucial for effectively harnessing the potential of AR and VR technologies to enhance learning styles within the realm of creative design processes.

7.Professional Development for Educators: To maximize the benefits of AR and VR, educators need training and professional development opportunities.

Research can investigate effective strategies for training teachers and instructors in the use of these technologies.

8.Industry Collaboration:

8.Future Directions and Recommendations

Collaborative research ventures with creative design industries can help ensure that AR and VR applications align with real-world professional needs. Such partnerships could lead to more practical and industry-relevant learning experiences. In summary, the future of research on the impact of AR and VR in creative design education lies in a multifaceted approach. It should encompass a broader spectrum of immersive technologies, delve deeper into pedagogical strategies, prioritize accessibility and inclusivity, and evaluate long term learning outcomes. Ethical considerations, professional development for educators, and industry collaboration are also key areas to explore, ultimately fostering a more holistic understanding of how AR and VR can shape the learning styles within creative design processes.

1.Exploring Extended Reality (XR): Future research should delve into the broader spectrum of Extended Reality (XR), which encompasses AR, VR, and Mixed Reality (MR). Investigating how these immersive technologies can be integrated seamlessly to accommodate various learning styles within creative design processes could provide a more comprehensive understanding of their impact.

2.Pedagogical Innovations: Continued exploration of pedagogical innovations and instructional design approaches tailored specifically for AR and VR environments is crucial.

Researchers should investigate how educators can effectively leverage these technologies to create engaging and learner-centric design education experiences.

9.Conclusion

3.Accessibility and Inclusivity:

In summary, the exploration of the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) on learning styles within the realm of creative design processes has unveiled a landscape of transformative potential, offering both educators and learners a cornucopia of opportunities and challenges. This research paper has traversed through the multifaceted terrain of modern educational technology, shedding light on the profound implications of AR and VR in shaping the future of creative design education. The adoption of AR and VR technologies in creative design education is emblematic of a broader educational shift towards immersive, interactive, and personalized learning experiences. Throughout this journey, it has become increasingly evident that these technologies have the capacity to transcend the limitations of traditional pedagogical approaches. By accommodating various learning styles, be it visual, auditory, kinesthetic, or multimodal, AR and VR have the potential to transform classrooms into dynamic hubs of engagement, fostering deeper understanding and knowledge retention. Moreover, the interactive and experiential nature of AR and VR experiences enables students to not merely observe but actively participate in the learning process. They can manipulate

Research should focus on making AR and VR educationally accessible to a wider audience. This includes developing cost-effective solutions, addressing physical accessibility challenges, and ensuring that learners with disabilities can fully engage with these technologies.

4.Long-term Learning Outcomes: Future studies should aim to assess the long-term effects of AR and VR integration on learners' creative design skills and professional development. Tracking graduates' career trajectories and their application of skills acquired through AR and VR education would provide valuable insights.

5.Cross-disciplinary Studies: Expanding the scope of research to encompass various creative design disciplines, such as graphic design, architecture, industrial design, and fashion design, would offer a more nuanced understanding of how AR and VR impact learning styles across different creative fields.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 655

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

virtual objects, experiment with design concepts, and engage in real-world simulations that were previously confined to the realms of imagination. This experiential learning amplifies the acquisition of practical skills, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities, which are indispensable in the field of creative design. However, this transformative journey is not without its share of challenges. Technical hurdles, including accessibility issues and the cost of hardware and software, pose significant obstacles to widespread adoption. Educators are confronted with the need to adapt their pedagogical methodologies to harness the full potential of these technologies effectively. This adaptation necessitates not only technical proficiency but also a nuanced understanding of how to integrate AR and VR seamlessly into the curriculum while aligning them with the diverse learning styles of students. As we reflect on the findings of this research paper, it becomes evident that the integration of AR and VR into creative design education offers a path towards cultivating a new generation of innovative and adaptable designers. These technologies bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application, a bridge that is essential for preparing students for the real-world challenges they will encounter in their careers. Looking forward, it is imperative for educational institutions, policymakers, and stakeholders in creative design education to recognize the significance of AR and VR as transformative tools. By investing in infrastructure, developing inclusive content, and providing training for educators, we can unlock the full potential of these technologies. Furthermore, collaborative efforts between academia and industry can bridge the gap between classroom learning and real-world application, nurturing professionals who are not only proficient in creative design but also adept at leveraging cutting edge technologies. In conclusion, the impact of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality on learning styles within the realm of creative design processes is profound and promising. This research paper has illuminated the transformative potential of AR and VR in shaping the landscape of creative design education. It underscores the need for a holistic approach to technology integration, one that acknowledges both the benefits and challenges, and actively seeks to empower educators and learners to navigate this exciting journey. As we stand at the cusp of a new era in education, the question is not whether AR and VR will revolutionize creative design education; it is how we, as educators and innovators, will embrace these technologies to sculpt a brighter future for the next generation of creative designers.

3. Young, A. (2020). Augmented reality as a new educational tool for social sciences students. Journal of Social Science Education, 19(1), 25-39.

4. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69.

5. Cheng, K. H., Tsai, C. C., & Zheng, Z. (2014). How do students’ approaches to learning create a learning-conducive online environment? Internet and Higher Education, 20, 4452.

6. Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.

7. Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.

8. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.

9. Cheng, M. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 629-640.

10. Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013).

Current status, opportunities, and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.

11. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32.

12. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). Making it real: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.

13. Chuang, T. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 163173.

14. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the realityvirtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282-292.

REFERENCES 1. Tilanka Chandrasekera, Oklahoma State University, USA So-Yeon Yoon, Cornell University, USA

15. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27-50.

2. Childs, M., & Keil, M. (2021). Enhancing learning with augmented reality: A new way of seeing and experiencing education. Springer.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

16. Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends in HumanComputer Interaction, 8(2-3), 73-272.

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 656

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

17. Chen, Y. L., & Chiang, T. H. C. (2015). Using augmented reality to enhance children’s learning in a science exhibition.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 337-349.

18. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 530-543.

© 2023, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.226

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 657