A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF TENDERING & CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION IN CONSTRUCTION
UG STUDENTS
OF FACULTY OF
ARCHITECTURE,
DESIGN & PLANNING KARPAGAM ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION COIMBATORE-641021
Abstract - Sustainable construction practices are also becoming a key consideration in the bidding process, with increasing emphasis on environmentally friendly materials and energy-efficient designs. The tendering process in construction plays a vital role in ensuring project feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and fair competition. Contractors must navigate a complex decision-making landscape, balancing factors such as resource availability, project risks, contract conditions, and financial viability. The increasing adoption of Etendering has transformed procurement practices, enhancing transparency, reducing administrative inefficiencies, and improving bid evaluation processes. Additionally, contractor experience, competition levels, and project-specific requirements significantly impact tendering outcomes. By leveraging digital procurement tools and refining bid selection criteria, construction firms can optimize project success rates, mitigate risks, and enhance overall industry efficiency. This review examines the critical elements influencing contractors' bidding decisions, highlights the importance of strategic planningandmarketanalysis.
IndexTerms-Constructiontendering,Biddingstrategies, Contractor selection, E-tendering, Procurement management, Project feasibility, Risk assessment, Regulatory Compliance, Digital procurement,Sustainability.
1. Introduction
Effectiveriskassessmentandcostestimationarecrucialfor makinginformedbiddingdecisions,asunforeseenexpenses and project delays can impact profitability. Furthermore, legal and regulatory compliance plays a significant role in contractor selection, ensuring adherence to industry standards and contractual obligations. Technological advancements in procurement software and data-driven analytics have enabled more accurate bid evaluations, reducing errors and improving decision-making efficiency. Theroleofclientrelationshipsandreputationmanagement in securing successful bids, as contractors with a history of timely project delivery and quality performance are more
likely to win contracts. As the construction industry continues to evolve, integrating smart technologies, automating procurement workflows, and adopting best practicesinbiddingstrategieswillbeessentialforlong-term growthandcompetitiveness.
Moreover, sustainability and environmental considerations arebecomingincreasinglyinfluentialinthebiddingprocess, with clients prioritizing contractors who incorporate ecofriendly materials, energy-efficient designs, and sustainable construction practices. The integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and artificial intelligence further enhances bid accuracy by allowing contractors to simulateprojectscenarios,optimizeresourceallocation,and identify potential risks early. Additionally, effective collaboration between stakeholders including architects, engineers, and suppliers ensures transparency and alignment with project objectives, ultimately strengthening bid competitiveness. As competition intensifies, firms that leverage innovation, strategic planning, and adaptive bidding methodologies will be better positioned to secure projects and maintain a competitive edge in the evolving constructionlandscape.
2.Literature Review
Theprocessof*bidding,tendering,andprocurement*plays a crucial role in ensuring the efficiency and effectiveness of construction projects. Various researchers have conducted comparative analyses to evaluate traditional and modern methods of tendering, contractor selection, and procurementstrategies.Thisstudyhighlightssixsignificant authorswhohaveextensivelycontributedtothisdomain.
1.TejasC.Patil,AshishP.Waghmare,andP.S.Gawande:
These Indian researchers have jointly conducted a comparative study on e-tendering versus traditional tendering in construction projects. Their work primarily focusesontheefficiency,cost,andtransparencyofdifferent tendering methods. Traditional tendering often involves manual paperwork, which can be time-consuming and pronetoerrors.Ontheotherhand,theirresearchhighlights
Kiruthick Harish V1, Lankesh D2, Mirudula A3, Negha S R4, Shyam V Madhu5, Vinu V6
that e-tendering significantly improves efficiency by reducingcosts,eliminatingpaperwork,andensuringgreater transparency in contractor selection. Their study has contributed to understanding the benefits of digital transformation in tendering for construction projects in India.
2.MohitSingh,HirendraPratapSingh,andRakeshSakale:
This team of researchers has contributed to the tendering process management in construction projects, emphasizing the factors influencing tendering efficiency, cost estimation, bid evaluation, and contractor selection. Their comparative analysis identifies key challenges faced by stakeholders during the bidding and selection process and proposes structured tendering methods to improve success rates. Their research underscores that accurate cost estimation and systematic evaluation of contractors lead to better projectexecutionanddelivery.
These UK-based researchers have studied the effectiveness of e-tendering in the construction industry, particularly in theUnitedKingdom.Theirresearchexploresadoptionrates, benefits, and challenges of e-tendering among construction firms. They emphasize that while e-tendering streamlines procurement by reducing paperwork and improving transparency, many companies resist adopting digital methods due to a lack of training and technical knowledge. Their study highlights the importance of technological adaptation and training to fully leverage e-tendering systems. Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025
5.GeoffTindsleyandPaulStephenson
3.AdeA.OladapoandHenryA.Odeyinka:
These researchers have extensively studied tender evaluation methods and compared the traditional lowestbidder selection method with advanced multi-criteria decision-makingtechniquessuchasMulti-AttributeAnalysis (MAA)andAnalyticHierarchyProcess(AHP).Theirfindings reveal that while the lowest-bidder approach is commonly used, multi-criteria evaluation methods lead to better longtermprojectsuccessbyconsideringfactorsbeyondjustcost, such as quality, experience, and risk management. Their research has influenced construction project management bypromotingdata-drivencontractorselectionmodels
4.MarkHackett,IanRobinson,andGaryStatham
These authors are well-known for their contributions to procurement, tendering, and contract administration in construction projects. Their research focuses on comparing differentprocurementstrategiesandtheirimpactonproject delivery.Theyemphasizetheneedforefficientprocurement planning,highlightinghoweffectivecontractadministration can lead to improved project timelines, cost management, and resource allocation. Their work serves as a comprehensive guide for construction professionals and policymakersseekingtooptimizeprocurementstrategies.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net
3. Comparative Analysis & Results
Author(s) Research Focus Key Concept
R F Barton
Examinationofhow competitive pressuresinfluence firms'decisions regardingoverhead costallocationin biddingscenarios
Laryea, S. and Hughes, W.
Examineshow contractorsconsider riskandpricing whenpreparingbids
Nitin S. Gokhale & Rajesh P. More SmartTendering Processes
R. Jayaraman & A. Chakraborty Sustainable TenderingPractices
C. Mehta & R. Kapoor
David Mosey
RiskAssessmentin Tendering
Procurement Methodsin Construction
John Murdoch & Will Hughes ConstructionLaw andTendering
Martin Loosemore & Peter Best
Keith Hampson & Peter Brandon
EthicalIssuesin Tendering
Technologyin Construction Procurement
Tang, S.L., Ming, L., and Chan, Y L Identifieskey factorsaffecting clientsatisfactionin engineering consultancyservices
Edward Davis & Roger Flanagan
CostControlin Tendering
Analysisoffirms' biddingbehaviors undervaryinglevels ofcompetition, focusingonthe strategiesemployed inoverhead allocation
Relationship betweenrisk perceptionand pricingstrategiesin constructiontenders
Digitalizationof procurementinIndia
Greenprocurement andsustainabilityin construction
Identifyingfinancial andexecutionrisks incontracts
Framework agreementsand alliancing
Legalaspectsof tenderingand disputeresolution
Fraudpreventionin procurement
Blockchainand digitalsecurityinetendering
Effective communication, projectmanagement, andquality assuranceasdrivers ofclientsatisfaction
Lifecyclecostingand budgetingmethods
Challenges Faced Analysis
Balancingtheneedto submitcompetitive bidswiththenecessity ofcoveringoverhead costs,especiallyunder intensecompetitive conditions
Uncertaintyinproject costs,competition pressure,andrisk allocationbetween clientsandcontractors
Lackofinfrastructure fordigitaltransition
Higherinitialcosts deteradoption
Uncertaintyinproject costs
Legalcomplexitiesin contractformation
Contractdisputesand misinterpretations
Corruptionandbid manipulation
Adoptionbarriersin developingmarkets
Misalignmentofclient expectations,project delays,andcost overruns
p-ISSN:2395-0072
Inaccuratecost estimations
Competitivepressurescanlead firmstoadjusttheiroverhead allocationsinbids,potentially impactingprofitabilityandcost recovery.Firmsmustcarefully considertheiroverheadallocation strategiestoremaincompetitive whileensuringfinancial sustainability.
Contractorsfactorinvariousrisks whenpricingbids,oftenleadingto costadjustmentstomitigate uncertainties,impactingoverall projectpricing.
Smarttenderingminimizeserrors andincreasestransparency
Long-termsustainabilitybenefits outweighinitialcosts.
Effectiveriskassessmentimproves projectstability.
Collaborativecontractsenhance long-termprojectefficiency
Stronglegalframeworksreduce litigationrisks.
Ethicaltenderingfostersfair competition.
Blockchainenhancessecurityand transparency.
Engineeringfirmsneedto prioritizeclearcommunication, qualitycontrol,andmeetingclient expectationstoimprove satisfactionandlong-termsuccess.
Lifecyclecostingoptimizeslongtermprojectbudgets.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net
Raymond Levitt & Henry N. Riggs
Robert D. Gilbreath
Performance-Based Contracting
Comprehensive guideonmanaging construction contractswitha focusonoperational controlstomitigate commercialrisks
Fiona F. Rahman & Thomas Uher DelaysinTendering Processes
Nabil Al-Khalil & Richard Fellows Contractor Prequalification Models
Ellis Baker, Ronan Champion Examinationof tenderingand procurement processesinthe construction industry
Rhys Andrews, George A. Boyne
Examinationofthe relationship betweenthesize andstructureof localgovernments andtheir administrative overheadcostsin Englishlocal authorities
Rong Du, Ernest Foo, Colin Boyd, Brian Fitzgerald
Analysisoftheetenderingprocessto identifyessential securityservices requiredtomeet legaland operational obligations
Steve Rowlinson Contract documentation and risk management in tendering
UsingKPIstoassess contractor performance
Detailedexploration ofcontractplanning, formation, administration,and monitoring
Subjectivityin performancemetrics
Addressingthe complexitiesof contractmanagement, includingbid evaluation,change orders,claims,and cross-border contracting
Factorscausing delaysinpublicand privatetenders
Useofdataanalytics forcontractor selection
Analysisofvarious procurement methods,tendering procedures,and contract administration practices
Analysisofhow populationsizeand government structureimpact central administrativecosts
Bureaucratic inefficienciesandbid rejections
Datareliabilityand accuracy
Navigatingthe complexitiesof selectingappropriate procurementroutes andmanaging tenderingprocesses effectively
Balancingeconomies ofscalewitheffective servicedelivery; determiningoptimal localgovernmentsize andstructure
Mappinglegal obligationsofetenderingtospecific securitypoliciesand services
Risk allocation and procurement strategies
Ensuring confidentiality, integrity, authentication,nonrepudiation,and availabilityin electronictendering systems
Disputes arising due to unclear contract terms
p-ISSN:2395-0072
Performance-basedcontracts ensurebetteraccountability.
Emphasizestheimportanceof structuredcontractmanagement processestocontrolcommercial riskseffectivelythroughoutthe contractlifecycle.
Streamlinedproceduresreduce projectdelays.
Data-drivenprequalification ensuresreliablecontractor selection.
Providespracticalguidanceon bestpracticesinprocurementand tendering,aimingtoenhance efficiencyandeffectivenessin constructionprojectdelivery.
Largerlocalauthoritiestendto havelowercentraladministrative costspercapita,suggesting economiesofscale.Additionally, councilsinthelowertierofthe two-tiersystemexhibithigher administrativeoverheads, indicatingpotentialbenefitsfrom amalgamatingsmallercouncils intolargerunitsorcreating unitaryauthorities.
Identifiedasetofessentialsecurity servicesnecessaryfore-tendering systemstofulfilllegaland operationalrequirements, emphasizingtheimportanceof integratingtheseservicesinto systemdesign.
Clear contract documentation reduces legal disputes and project risks
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN:2395-0056
Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN:2395-0072
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, this review highlights the key challenges and benefits of tendering and bidding processes in the construction industry. While e-tendering offers advantages likecostsavingsandimprovedcommunication,itsadoption is hindered by resistance to change, security concerns, and lack of training. Effective overhead cost management and pricing strategies are crucial for maintaining profitability, and risk perception plays a significant role in bid preparation. Virtual tendering systems can enhance efficiencybutrequirestrongsecurityandtrust.Additionally, client satisfaction in engineering consultancy depends on clear communication, quality control, and effective project management.
Overall, overcoming barriers to e-tendering adoption and improving training, education, and management support are essential for enhancing construction procurement efficiency. Overhead control is essential in project profitability as contractors require strong indirect cost control. Bid planning is hindered by perceived risk to achieve equilibrium between risk aversion and competition pricing. It also postulates that customer satisfaction in engineering consultancy relies on communication, project management, and quality assurance to ensure longtermsuccess.
5. References
1. Adegbile,M. B.O.(2004).Tenderingprocedureand contractual arrangement: A review of the state of theart.
2. ConstructioninNigeria.19(1),12–21
3. Ashworth, A. (2001). Contractual procedure in the construction industry (4th Ed.). Pearson Education Ltd,
4. Harlow.
5. Bathurst,P.E.andButler,D.A.(1980). Building cost control techniques and economics; William Heinemann
6. Ltd.,London.
7. Fayek, A, Young, D.M. and Duffield, C.F. (1998). A survey of tendering practices in the Australian construction
8. industry. Engineering Management Journal, 10 (4), 29–34.
9. Fayek, A., Ghoshal, I. and AbouRizk, S. (1999). A survey of bidding practices of Canadian Civil engineering
10. construction contractors. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,26,13-25.
11. FOCI (2004). Fifty years of construction in Nigeria (1954 - 2004). Lagos: Federation of Construction Industry.
12. Harris, F. and McCaffer, R. (2001). Modern Construction Management (5th Ed.). Blackwell Science,Oxford.
13. Hiyassat, M.A.S (2001). Construction bid price evaluation. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28,264-270.
14. Lowe,D.JandParvar,J(2004).Alogisticregression approach to modelling the contractor’s decision to bid.
15. Construction Management and Economics, 22, 643653
16. NIOB. (2003). Building/Construction industry directory. Lagos:NigerianInstituteofBuilding
17. Pearl, RG, Bowen, P.A and Hall, R.A (1999). How much profit to go for: the contractor’s bidding decision, CIB
18. W55 and W65 Joint Triennial Symposium. Customer Satisfaction: A focus for research and practice,CapeTown,
19. 5-10Sept,1999,Editors:Bowen,PAandHindle,R.
20. Ramus, J.W (1981) Contract practice for Quantity Surveyors.Heinemann,London
21. Shash, A.A (1993). Factors considered in tendering decision by top UK contractors. Construction Management
22. andEconomics (1993),11,111-118
23. Shen, LY, Li, QM, Drew, D and Shen, QP (2004). Awarding construction contracts on multicriteria basisin
24. China. Construction Engineering and Management, May/June2004,385-395
25. Ward, P.A (1979). Organisation and procedures in theconstructionindustry.McDonaldandEvansltd.,
26. Yusif, A. and Odeyinka, H. A. (2000). An evaluation of tendering practice in the Nigerian construction industry.
27. ConstructioninNigeria, 15(2),3–7
28. Akshay Kumar Tandale, Chaitanya Shirsath, Bharat Vigne,YashDane,Dr.Ayub Sheikh(2016),Analysis &
29. Optimization to Improve the Tedious Tendering Process in Construction Industry, IJLTEMAS, VolumeV,
30. .Levision, W. (2000). Iso 9000 at the Front Line (illustrateded.).ASQQualityPress.