Issuu

A Comprehensive Framework for Secure and Transparent E-voting Using Blockchain Technology

Satyam Pandey1 , Srajal Verma2 , Ramansh Saxena3 ,Sunit Kumar Mishra4

1-3 Student Computer Science & Engineering, School of Management Sciences, Lucknow, U.P., India

4 Assist. Professor, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, School of Management Sciences, Lucknow, U.P., India

Abstract - Electoral processes globally face ongoing challengesconcerningtransparency,cost-effectiveness,speed, andoverallsecurity.Traditionalpaper-basedmethodsexhibit logistical complexities, while many early digital voting systems, reliant on centralized architectures, introduced significant vulnerabilities and often failed to cultivate sufficient public trust. Blockchain technology emerges as a promising alternative, distinguished by its inherent decentralization, cryptographic immutability, and potential foroperationaltransparency. Theseaspectsplaceitfavorably forbuildingmorereliableelectronicvoting(e-voting)systems. This paper distills major challenges, varied design solutions, and suggested cryptographic techniques presented in recent research on blockchain solutions for e-voting. From this distillation, we present a conceptual framework that uses cryptographic methods,embracestheautomationpotentialof smart contracts, and implements a controlled, permissioned blockchain architecture. The goal is to significantly improve the security of elections, ensure rigorously the privacy of voters, ensure procedural transparency, and advance end-toend integrity and audibility over what is currently in place. The architecture outlines important elements encompassing voterauthentication,ballotsecrecy,securecasting,automated counting,andverifiablepublicationofresults.Thisprospectis balanced against the recognition that there are substantial technological, logistic, and socio-political problems that continue in this area

Key Words e-Voting,Blockchain,Cybersecurity,Smart Contracts, Decentralization, Transparency, Voter Privacy,ElectionIntegrity,Auditability,Shamir’sSecret Sharing

1.INTRODUCTION

The integrity of democratic elections is paramount, but withstandingprocesses,whetherpaperorearlyelectronic experiments,posecompellinghurdles.Paperballotsystems traditional ballots, though with familiarity, face cost, inefficiencies, risk of counting errors, and certain vulnerabilities[6,12,8].Earlyattemptsatelectronicvoting tendedtoswaptheseproblemsforothersbydependingon centralizeddatabasesandservers.Centralizationpresents appealingtargetsforattackers,increasesworriesaboutthe possibilityofinternalmanipulationbyadministrators,and

***

tends to make the vote counting opaque to the common citizen,inhibitingverificationandpotentiallyreducingtrust [3,11].

Against this context, blockchain technology offers an interestingarchitecturalalternative.Developedoriginallyas abaseforcryptocurrenciessuchasBitcoin[2],itscorevalue propositionforapplicationslikee-votingliesindistributed trust. Essential traits include: a ledger duplicated among several participants, making central failureorcontrol less probable; cryptographic chaining of data blocks, making recordsinthepasteffectivelyimmutable;andfrequently,a highlevelofprocesstransparencyavailabletoparticipants [1,11,12].Thisdistributedconsensusmodelsubstitutesthe needforasingletrustedintermediarywithtrustinherentin theprotocolitself[1,9].

This paper synthesizes current research [5, 13, 16] to synthesizeunderstandingandadvanceaunifyingconceptual frameworkfore-votingbasedonblockchain.Ouraimistogo beyondenumeratingblockchain’spotentialadvantagesand to describe a more unified model of operation. This frameworkcontainsnecessarycryptographicprimitivesfor ensuringsecurityandprivacy,usessmartcontractsforthe automation of rules and processes, and relies upon a permissionedblockchainarchitectureappropriateforofficial elections[1].Wewilldiscussthetechnologicalfoundations, describe the suggested process from registration to the verification of results, analyze key security aspects, and critically examine the overarching challenges technical, social,andregulatory thatstillhinderthepervasiveuptake ofsecureblockchaine-votingsolutions.IdeassuchasFusco etal.’s”Crypto-voting”[1],basedonadvancedcryptographic sharingandsidechains,arethetypeofintegratedsolutions thissynthesizedframeworktakesintoaccount.

2. BLOCKCHAIN AND E-VOTING

Havingasecureblockchaine-votingsystemwillnecessitatea firm grasp of some foundation technologies and cryptographicprinciplesthatarecommonlyemphasizedin thesourcematerial

• Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) & Decentralization: Blockchain is actually a distributed,

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

replicated,andsynchronizeddatabaseacrossanetworkof participants. The distribution is different from centralized methods, providing inherent resilience and eliminating relianceonasinglepointofauthoritytoverifydata[1],[11], [12].

• Block Structure and Immutability: Transactionsor votes are collected in blocks. Blocks are cryptographically hash-linkedtothepreviousblock,creatingacomplete,timestampedchain.Suchastructurerendersitcomputationally infeasibletomodifypreviousdatawithoutrenderingtherest ofthechainunusableasaconsequence.Suchimmutabilityis necessaryinordertoguaranteetheintegrityoftherecordof votes[6],[11],[12].

• Cryptographic Hashing: SHA-256 and the like are blockchain heavy-hitters, producing unique digital fingerprintsofdata.Theyareusedtoconnectblocks,verify dataintegritywithinblocks(typicallyviaMerkletrees[6]), andsecuritymeasures.

• Consensus Mechanisms: Thesearethealgorithms that determine nodes’ agreement on transactions’ validity andwhichblocktoappendnexttothechain.WhileProofofWork(PoW)securespublicchains[3],[9],energyefficiency and control lead permissioned e-voting systems to opt for alternativeslikeProof-of-Authority(PoA)orByzantineFault Tolerant (BFT) algorithms like PBFT [9], [11], where validationoccursbyknownspecificparties.

• Smart Contracts: Popularizedbyblockchainssuchas Ethereum [3], [7], [8], [9], [10], smart contracts are prewritten units of code on the blockchain. They execute actionsbasedonrulesalreadyset,e.g.,checkingtheeligibility of voters, setting a time limit for voting, counting through algorithms, and reporting results, which enhances transparencyandlessensdependenceonhumanconduct[7], [9]. Koc¸ et al.’s [7] mechanism, for example, is highly dependentonEthereumsmartcontracts.

• Blockchain Types (Publicvs.Permissioned):Public blockchains (e.g., Bitcoin) provide maximal openness but generallylackwantedprivacycontrolsandasyettoolittle scalability for application in national elections. Private blockchains are centralized. Permissioned or consortium blockchains[1],[9],[12]withalimitedlevelofinvolvement byinvitedstakeholders(e.g.,electoralcommittees,auditors) providemorecontroloverwhocanbegrantedaccess,more privacy, and in certain cases also more performance for governmental e-voting [1], [9]. Shahzad and Crowcroft suggest,inparticular,an’adapted’consortiumsolutionfor securevoting[12].

• Privacy ProtectionthroughCryptography:Standard blockchainoperationsfailtoensurevoteranonymity.Hence, sophisticated cryptographic methods are required. HomomorphicEncryption,toucheduponbrieflyinGupta& Tripathi [15]and Hardwicket al. [10], enables votes tobe

countedwhileremainingencrypted.Zero-KnowledgeProofs (ZKPs),thesubjectinprotocolssuchasZCashandaddressed inFuscoetal.[1]andHjalmarsson&´Hreiarsson[9],enable us to demonstrate correctness without disclosing vote contents.BlindSignatures,thesubjectinproposalssuchas Pathaketal.[3]andHardwicketal.[10],obscureballotsbut still sign them. Secret Sharing Schemes, such as the use of Shamir’s method addressed in Fusco et al. [1], provide mechanisms of sharing trust or cryptography keys across variousparties

3. PROPOSED BLOCKCHAIN E-VOTING SYSTEM

Our design integrates these aspects into a proposed frameworkforblockchaine-votingwithafocusonresilience andflexibility.

3.1 Architecture Overview

ThearchitectureisaPermissionedConsortiumBlockchain. The design is selected because it is able to combine distributedintegritywithrequiredaccesscontrol,including key electoral agents (national/regional commissions, accreditedauditors)asvalidatingnodes[1],[9], [12]. This architecturedeliverssharedgovernanceandincreasedtrust betweenknownparticipants,withoutpublicchainopenness challengesandprivatechainsingle-point-of-controlissues. Isolatednoderoles,suchasauthorities,validators,andsecure voter interfaces, handle independent fragments of the process [9]. Multi-chain designs or sidechains, based on designssuchasCrypto-voting[1],areproposedasameansto enhancescalabilityandconfidentialitybypossiblyunlinking voterregistrationdatafromanonymizedvoterecords[1],[3]. TheconceptuallayersareshowninFigure1.

3.2. Most Important Components & Technologies

The successful operation of this system depends on a sequenceofkeytechnologicalelements:

•AsuitableBlockchainPlatform needstoprovidesecure smartcontractfunctionalityandanappropriate,BFT-based

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

consensus mechanism suitable for a permissioned environment. Alternatives like Hyperledger Fabric [11] providemodularityandidentitymanagementfunctionality. Alternatively,permissionedversionsofEthereum[1],[9]are equally appropriate thanks to the maturity of Solidity and correspondingtooling[7],[8].

• A full Smart Contract Suite enactsmajorelectionlogic [7],[9],[10].Thesearesmartcontractsforoverallelection management(regulations,timing,listsofcandidates),voter eligibilitytracking(managingtokensorpermissions),ballot definitions and vote submission handling, and tally logic executing the chosen privacy scheme automatically. The precise implementation is strongly platform- and cryptography-dependent.

• Advanced-Level Cryptography for Secrecy and Verifiability: Voter privacy without loss of verifiability involves more sophisticated cryptographic processes than standardblockchainoperations:

– Homomorphic Encryption [10], [15] allows the Tallying Contracttoperformvotecalculationsforeachcandidatefrom encrypted ballots without exposing individual votes in the courseofcounting.

– Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) [1], [9] allow a voter to provide cryptographic evidence that her (possibly secret) voteisvalid(e.g.,choosesoneoftheapprovedcandidates) andthatsheisqualified,yetwithoutshowingtheactualvote choice.

– Blind Signatures [3], [10] or similar anonymization protocols may be used in the voter authentication/token issuingsteptorenderimpossibletheabilityoftheapproving authority to connect that very approval with the final anonymousvotebeingcasttotheballotcontract.

• Hardened Interfaces: All voter interactions need to be throughhardenedinterfaces(webapplications,nativemobile applications,securephysicalkiosks)shieldedfromstandard webattacksandlimitedsothatmalwarecannotdisruptthe votepriortoitscryptographicsigning[5],[9].

3.3. Voting Process Flow

The voting process is multi-staged, supported by smart contractsandmadesecurebycryptography:

Step 1 Initialization: The voting authorities deploy and initializethesmartcontractsspecifictotheelectiononthe permissionedblockchain,creatingtheimmutablerules[7], [9].

Step 2 Registration & Authentication: Voters are authentically registered using methods connected with government documents, perhaps national digital IDs [9], backed up by secure biometric identification (fingerprint, facescan)[6],[14],[17]conductedviaatrustedchannel(e.g.,

a standalone application or secure kiosk). Successful authentication issues the voter a certain cryptographic privilegeortokentovote[1],[13].Anonymizationprotocols areemployedhereifneeded.

Step 3: Voting: Theauthenticatedvoteremploysasecure interfacetodisplaythevotingalternatives(obtainedfromthe smartcontract)andcastthevote.Theinterfaceassiststhe voterincryptographicallypreparinghisvoteinlinewiththe system’sprivacyprotocol(e.g.,encrypt,createaZKP).The voter signs the transaction digitally with his private key, demonstratinghisauthorizationwithoutcompromisingthe key [7], [9], [10]. The signed, cryptographically secured transactionispublishedtothenetwork.

Step 4 Validation & Block Creation: The permissioned Validation Nodes authenticate the transaction. They run smartcontractcodetoensurethesignature,checkthevoter’s credential is valid and has not been used before (applying one-votecapsthroughthesmartcontractstate),andcheck thecryptographicpayload(e.g.,checktheZKP).Nodescome toanagreementonagroupofvalidtransactionstoincludein thenextblockusingtheselectedconsensusalgorithm(e.g., PBFT),andthencryptographicallyappendittothechain[9], [12].

Step 5 Counting Votes: Votesarecountedonthebasisof smart contracts by either summing encrypted values [10], [15]orbyverifyingproofsandincrementingpubliccounters. This should be performed without releasing intermediate resultswhichinfluencecurrentvoting[7].

Step 6 Result Decryption & Publication: Oncevotinghas closed, if decryption is required, a secure multi-party protocol with key shares possessed by various authorities disclosesthefinalencryptedcount.Theauthenticatedresult isthenpublishedirretrievablyontotheblockchainthrougha closing transaction, typically executed by the Tallying or ElectionManagementcontract[7],[9].

Step 7 Verification and Audit: Followingtheelection,there isprovisionofmultiplelevelsofverification.Nonidentifying transaction receipts with which voters are able to independentlycheck thattheycasttheirvoteandthatthis wascountedfor(withoutsharingtheirvoteitself).Auditors (and arguably the public also) can themselves query the blockchaintocheckonvoteinclusion(withnon-identifying receipts) and monitor the entire process log and contract execution [1], [5], [10]. The overall sequence of the blockchain-basedvotingprocedureisillustratedinFigure2, summarizing key interactions from authentication to vote recording.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

4.SECURITY, PRIVACY, AND AUDITABILITY CONSIDERATIONS

This blockchain-based framework improves inherent properties of elections while requiring distinct careful cryptographicdesignforothers:

•Transparency&Auditability: Theinvariantdistribution ledger gives unspeakable transparency into the process of votingrecordingandtallying.Eachconfirmedtransactionwill becomeforeverpermanentandindependentlyverifiableby authorized auditors. The smart contract code defining the rulescanbeinspectedpubliclybeforedeployment[1],[5], [11].E2Everifiability,allowingvoterstocheckthattheirvote hasbeencountedwithoutanycompromisetosecrecy,isa primarygoalprovidedbycryptographicreceiptsorZKP.

• Voter Privacy & BallotSecrecy: Firstandforemost,itis ’who’votedfor’whom.’Thisisnotaninherentpropertyof basic blockchains (which at best provide pseudonymity). Concerningthefinalballotchoiceasrecordedortalliedonchain,thebaseofourframeworkheavilyrestsonadvanced cryptographictechniques(homomorphicencryption,ZKPs, blindsignatures)speciallydesignedtoseverthelinkbetween theauthenticatedvoterandhischoiceasrecordedortallied onchain [1], [3], [9], [10], [15]. Thus, it is a critical design requirement and not an automatic benefit. This is the recurringthemeacross[5],[7],[10],[13].

• Security and Integrity: Data integrity is one majorcore benefit [11], [12]. The decentralized system becomes

resilient-enhancing[1],[9].CommondefensesagainstDDoS on the core network are higher; however, interface points remain vulnerable [1], [13]. Permissioned models largely mitigate Sybil attacks [9], [13]. Coercion and vote-buying, however, remain critical challenges difficult to solve technologically alone [5], [9], [10], [13]. Mechanisms like allowingvotechanges[10]canhelpbutarenotcompletely solvingtheissue.Endpointsecurity thatis,protectingthe voter’s device is arguably the most significant practical vulnerability [5], [9]. Robust initial voter authentication is also paramount as weaknesses here can compromise the entire system integrity [6], [9], [14]. The ”adjusted” blockchainapproachbyShahzadandCrowcroft[12]focuses onimprovingtrustworthinessundertheseconstraints.

5. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

blockchain e-voting at large scale requires addressing considerablepracticalandtheoreticalchallenges:

• Scalability & Performance: Nationalelectionsproduce millions of votes within a focused time window. Existing blockchainplatforms,evenpermissionedones,canstruggle with this transaction volume, risking delays in vote confirmation.Furtherresearchintohigh-capacityconsensus methods, splitting the network processing, and layer-2 scalingsolutionstailoredforvotingisessential[1],[5],[11], [13].

• Usability & Accessibility (Digital Divide): Thesystem should be plainly easy to use by citizens with limited technicalliteracy.Inaddition,makingitaccessibletothose wholackstableinternetorpersonalcomputingequipmentis requiredtosupporttherighttovote.Thisprobablyinvolves providingsecure,accessiblephysicalvotingalternatives(e.g., auditedkiosks)simultaneouslywithremotealternatives[5], [10].

• Endpoint Security & Malware: As noted, securing the variedmixofvoterdevices(computers,smartphones)from being compromised isa significantchallenge necessitating strongapplicationsecurityandend-usereducation[5],[9].

• Cryptographic Key Management: Secure generation, distribution, storage, utilization, and potential recovery of privatekeysorothercryptographiccredentialsforawhole electorateislogisticallyandtechnicallychallenging.End-user error(losingakey)maydepriveusersoftheirvotingrights withoutstrongrecoveryprocesses,whichthemselveshaveto besafeguardedagainstexploitation.

• Development and Operation Costs: Development, deployment,carefullyauditing,andimplementingasecure, large-scaleblockchain-basedvotingsystemiscomplexand likely costly, demanding specialized knowledge and considerableinfrastructureinvestment[3],[9].

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

• Governance, Regulation & Standardization: Defining unmistakablegovernancepatternsforpermissionedelection blockchains(whooperatesnodes,howareruleschanged?), developingfacilitatinglegalandgovernmentalstructuresfor electronically cast and blockchain-validated votes and the creation of technical standards for security and working togetherarepreconditionsforwidespreadadoption[5],[11].

• Establishing Public Trust: Itwilltakealotofworkin education,showingdependabilitythroughopenpilots,and third-party audits to instill public trust in this advanced technologyforsuchaconsequentialpurpose[5],[11].

• Immutability vs. Error Correction: The same immutabilitythatofferssecuritycanrendercorrectingactual mistakes(e.g.,awronglycodedsmartcontractregulation,an improperly cast ballot prior to a deadline unless modificationsarepermitted)difficultaftertheevent.Careful designandpredeploymentinspectingareessential[11].

5.1 The Future Development and Research

Thefuturedevelopmentandresearchshouldconsequently bedirectedtowardtheseareas:performanceandscalability improvementsdesignedforvotingworkloads;investigation ofnew,secure,andusablevoterauthenticationtechniques (possibly incorporating verifiable digital identities or securely implemented biometrics [17]); security for voter devices and interfaces; user experience research on accessibility and trust; establishment of transparent governance election blockchain models; and cooperation amongtechnologists,policymakers,andelectoralspecialists todevelopsuitableregulatoryframeworks.

6. CONCLUSION

Blockchaintechnologyprovidesapowerfularchitecturaland cryptographictoolboxthathasthepotentialtoadvancethe security,transparency,auditability,andabilitytorecoverof electronicvotingsystems relative to bothhistorical paper techniquesandpreviouscentralizeddigitalmethods[1],[5], [11].Theintegratedframeworkpresentedhereinillustrates thewayinwhichtheintegrationofpermissioneddistributed ledgers, process automation through smart contracts, and critical privacy-enhancing cryptographic methods [1], [7], [9],[10],[12],[15]providesanavenuetowardmorecredible digitalelections.

Yet, it is important to avoid technological determinism. Major,multifacetedscalabilitychallengesinvolvingsecuring the voter interaction endpoint, closing the digital divide, securely handling cryptographic credentials at scale, creating legal validity, and most importantly, generating broadpublictrustarestillmajorbarriers[5],[9],[11],[13]. Problems such as off-line coercion also place bounds on whattechnology cando on itsown. Thus,theappropriate developmentofblockchainforhigh-stakespublicelections should move forward with caution, marked by stringent independent auditing, transparency, user-centric design,

ongoing research into minimizing known risks, and close cooperation among technologists, election officials, legal specialists,andcivilsociety.Promisingasitis,blockchainis apotentelementwithinanecessarilylargersocio-technical systemneededfortrustworthyelectronicvoting.

REFERENCES

[1] Fusco, F., Lunesu, M. I., Pani, F. E., & Pinna, A. (2018). Cryptovoting, a Blockchain based e-Voting System. In Proceedingsofthe10thInternationalJointConference onKnowledgeDiscovery,KnowledgeEngineeringand KnowledgeManagement(IC3K2018)-Volume3:KMIS, pages 223-227. SCITEPRESS. DOI: 10.5220/0006962102230227M.Young,TheTechnical Writer’sHandbook.MillValley,CA:UniversityScience, 1989.

[2] Nakamoto,S.(2008).Bitcoin:APeer-to-PeerElectronic Cash System. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfK.Elissa,“Titleofpaperif known,”unpublished.

[3] Pathak, M., Suradkar, A., Kadam, A., Ghodeswar, A., & Parde, P. (2021). Blockchain Based E-Voting System. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 8(3), 134-140. DOI: 10.32628/IJSRST2182120.

[4] Gibson, J. P., Krimmer, R., Teague, V., & Pomares, J. (2016). A review of E-voting: The past, present and future. Annals of Telecommunications, 71(7-8), 279–286.DOI:10.1007/s12243-016-0521-9

[5] Kshetri, N., & Voas, J. (2018). Blockchain-Enabled Evoting. IEEE Software, 35(4), 95-99. DOI: 10.1109/MS.2018.2801546.

[6] Indapwar, A., Chandak, M., & Jain, A. (2020). E-Voting system using Blockchain technology. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(3), 2775-2779. DOI: 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/45932020

[7] Koç,A.K.,Yavuz,E.,Çabuk,U.C.,&Dalkılıç,G.(2017). TowardsSecureE-VotingUsingEthereumBlockchain.In 2017FifthInternationalSymposiumonDigitalForensic and Security (ISDFS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISDFS.2017.7955660

[8] Al-madani,A.M.,Gaikwad,A.T.,Mahale,V.,&Ahmed,Z. A. T. (2021). Decentralized E-voting system based on SmartContractbyusingBlockchainTechnology.In2021 InternationalConferenceonComputerCommunication and Informatics (ICCCI) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICCCI50826.2021.9402701

[9] Hjalmarsson,F..,&Hreiarsson,G.K.(2018).Blockchain´ Based E-Voting System. In 2018 IEEE International

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

ConferenceonCloudComputing(CLOUD)(pp.983-986). IEEE.DOI:10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00151

[10] Hardwick, F. S., Gioulis, A., Akram, R. N., & Markantonakis,K.(2018).E-VotingwithBlockchain:An E-Voting Protocol with Decentralisation and Voter Privacy. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on InternetofThings(iThings)etal.(pp.1561-1567).IEEE.

[11] Curran, K. (2018). E-Voting on the Blockchain. The JournaloftheBritishBlockchainAssociation,1(2).DOI: 10.31585/jbba-1-2-(3)2018

[12] Shahzad, B., & Crowcroft, J. (2019). Trustworthy Electronic Voting Using Adjusted Blockchain Technology. IEEE Access, 7, 24477-24488. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895670

[13] Benabdallah,A.,Audras,A.,Coudert,L.,ElMadhoun,N., &Badra,M.(2022).AnalysisofBlockchainSolutionsfor E-Voting:ASystematicLiteratureReview.IEEEAccess, 10,70746-70759.DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187688

[14] Alam, A., Rashid, S. M. Z. U., Salam, M. A., & Islam, A. (2018).TowardsBlockchain-BasedE-votingSystem.In 2018 2nd International Conference on Innovations in Science,EngineeringandTechnology(ICISET)(pp.351354).IEEE.DOI:10.1109/ICISET.2018.8745613

[15] Gupta, S. P., & Tripathi, A. M. (2021). E-Voting using Blockchain. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1911(1),012001.IOPPublishing.DOI:10.1088/17426596/1911/1/012001

[16] Rathee,G.,Iqbal,R.,Waqar,O.,&Bashir,A.K.(2021).On theDesignandImplementationofaBlockchainEnabled E-VotingApplicationWithinIoT-OrientedSmartCities. IEEE Access, 9, 34165-34176. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021

[17] Patil, H. V., Rathi, K. G., & Tribhuwan, M. V. (2018). A Study on Decentralized E-Voting System Using BlockchainTechnology.InternationalResearchJournal ofEngineeringandTechnology(IRJET),5(11),48-53.