ipcm® n. 49 - January/February 2018

Page 108

ANALYSIS

How Long Should You Run an Accelerated Weathering/Corrosion Test? Carly McGee KTA-Tator, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

www.ktauniversity.com

“I

would like to issue a 30-year warranty on

into one cycle may not prove beneficial,

because different types of materials react

my product. How long of a test should

but rather would complicate the analysis

in diverse ways, no one cycle can be

I run to correlate hours to years?” or,

when a failure occurs. Another aspect to

specified for every material. Laboratory

“Our engineering standard requires 2000

consider is the proportion of the duration

exposure is simply giving you a means

hours of exposure. Is that long enough?” and

and intensity of one stressor relative to

to rank the susceptibility of materials © KTA-Tator

“what is the correlation in years?” these are important questions, and are challenging to answer. This article

to aspects of the simulated service condition(s). By evaluating the material’s susceptibility to

attempts to answer these and other

different aspects in separate

questions pertaining to accelerated

exposure regimes, you can rank

weathering testing.

the materials for resistance to

We first need to rewind and start

moisture separately from their

with why we run accelerated

resistance to corrosion, and so

weathering regimes. Any exposure

on.

test, from salt fog to ultraviolet

There are, however, instances

light exposure, simulates a limited

where the mechanisms work in

number of characteristics of a service

tandem; for example, straight

environment. We run a test to evaluate

UV light exposure from the sun

a material’s susceptibility to the usual

is rarely specified for exposure

suspects: corrosive conditions, solar

of exterior coatings as sunlight

radiation, sensitivity to moisture,

and rain (or condensation) work

temperature, pollution, windborne

together in nature to degrade

particulates, or a myriad of other, less

materials like plastics and

quantifiable powers (yes, even bird

coatings. Artificially generated UV

droppings). Exposure tests provide

light will destroy polymer bonds

us with a means to expose a material

and discolour pigments the

under very specific, measurable

same as the sun; rain and dew

parameters, and perhaps accelerate

then remove the degradation

the exposure compared to real-time.

products, exposing fresh polymer

Next, we need to touch on how to

and pigment. One exposure test,

run an exposure test to answer our questions. Some exposure regimes incorporate multiple stressors into one cycle, which should be done with

ASTM D5894, Standard Practice

1

for Cyclic Salt Fog/UV Exposure

Figure 1: Test panel subjected to UV and corrosive exposure.

of Painted Metal, (Alternating Exposures in a Fog/Dry Cabinet and a UV/Condensation Cabinet)

caution. If a material underperforms, there may be no means to pinpoint which

another. For example, porous materials may

combines ultraviolet light, heat, moisture,

stressor was the culprit. The mechanism of

experience a greater acceleration factor,

corrosive conditions, and temperature

degradation is different for each of these.

as they are more susceptible to moisture

cycling into one regime (Fig. 1). The

Attempting to combine degrative mechanisms

intrusion than less porous materials. And

corrosive portion of the Standard Practice

100

N. 49 - JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2018 - international PAINT&COATING magazine


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
ipcm® n. 49 - January/February 2018 by ipcm® International Paint&Coating Magazine - Issuu