Response to NAF Amicus Brief

Page 10

Case3:10-cv-00504-RS Document51

1 2 3

V.

CONCLUSION. San Francisco’s restricted IRV system is unconstitutional. Nothing in the

NAF amicus brief establishes otherwise. Respectfully submitted,

4 5

Filed04/07/10 Page10 of 10

Dated: April 7, 2010

6 7 8 9

NIELSEN, MERKSAMER, PARRINELLO, MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP By:/s/James R. Parrinello James R. Parrinello

.

By:/s/Christopher E. Skinnell Christopher E. Skinnell

.

10

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

__________________________________________________________________________ PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION BY NAF TO FILE A BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE

CASE NO. 10-CV-00504-SI Page 9


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.