InQuire visit our website at - www.inquirelive.co.uk
Free
a generation of idiots?
comment - page 5
bill gates funds online universities
Issue 8.8
all i want for christmas is...
iq entertainment - page 18
the history of christmas
iq culture - page 19
7 th December 2012
edible gifts for christmas
iq features - page 14
kent students vote in asvs
Melissa East LEADING American universities Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have collaborated to form the edX project, funded by The Gates Foundation, which will provide online university courses for local community colleges. Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, has granted the project $1 million (ÂŁ630,000) in funding, with the wish of supporting innovation in education. According to edX president and MIT professor of electrical engineering and computer science Anant Argawal, the $60million (ÂŁ38 million) projectâs âtechnology and innovative teaching methods have the potential to transform the way community college students learn, both in and out of the classroomâ. Dr. Mulder, president of the OpenCourseWare group promoting free online course materials, believes that within the next five years, the majority of universities will be using online learning in some form. Despite increasing support from Americaâs leading businessmen and universities, there are some who already doubt the potential success of the ground-breaking project. Louise Robinson, president of the Girlsâ School Association, argued that if these online university courses do not require A levels (or equivalent) to qualify for entry, the entire international school system would collapse. âIf we lose the necessity of our narrow three A-level prescribed university route, will there be need for GCSEs or even English Baccalaureate Certificates. âPersonally I cannot see one and we all know that some of us are questioning the validity of them.â
cheerleader challenge
sport - page 23
leveson report published Matthew Gilley Newspaper News Editor
Students gather for a rally supporting BAE and their presence on campus. Photo by Daniel Barnby.
George Hopkin Website Sport Editor ON 22nd November, polls opened to decide upon eight All Student Vote (ASV) motions. These included the controversial move to ban BAE Systems from campus and a proposed campaign to save Chaucer Fields from University building work â an idea that has been divisive on campus and with local residents in the Canterbury community. The biggest question was what would happen with the results. On the 29th November the polls closed at 12:00pm, midday. If a motion is passed then the idea becomes policy for one year. If, a motion were to fall, then Kent Union will not hold a position either way on the issue for a year. Alex Murray, Kent Union VicePresident for Education, recently released a statement about his position with regards to the ASVs and his involvement in the BAE Systems issue. He said, about the vote: âTo see so many students
debating issues is exactly what we wanted to get out of these structures so get out and vote and decide the line that the Union walks.â In the past, Kent Union has only ever had one ASV: Whether Kent Union should campaign to support Equal Marriage. That idea was accepted last term, in Summer 2012. The turnout for that ASV came to just over 400 votes. This latest ASV round saw 11,113 votes made, and 1,644 voters turned out via the online voting system on Kent Unionâs website. Colum McGuire, Kent Union Vice-President for Welfare, said: âIâm thrilled with the great turnout we got in the all student votes. To me itâs an indication that when we have relevant and controversial issues to the student body they will get actively engaged to turnout to vote to get their voice heard. Itâs exciting that our members have an opportunity to submit an idea of what they think should happen and have a debate across campus about it. I think itâs a huge improvement in making sure that our members
have key involvement in deciding the direction of Kent Union as opposed to decisions being made behind closed doors.â The results of the ASVs mean that Kent Union will campaign to save Chaucer Fields, to increase the amount of renewable energy produced on campus, and for a change in policy toward unpaid internships. Kent Union will also campaign for subsidised printing for students and it shall require organisers of events with outside speakers to make the speaker aware of its Zero Tolerance Policy. Moves to ban lads mags and music channels from Union outlets were rejected, and Kent Union will not cease to have any association with BAE Systems or ban them from campus â an idea that provoked the most responses, with 1,489 votes being cast. The two motions that saw the most landslide-like results were the ones on a prospective campaign for subsidised printing and a move to ban music channels from being... (continued on page three)
LORD Justice Leveson published his report on press standards and regulation last Thursday. The report calls for an independent regulatory body underpinned by legislation. Leveson proposes that the new body, whilst essentially being a form of self-regulation, will have âdemonstrable independence from both political and commercial interestsâ and that its Chair and board members âshall not include any serving editor or member of the House of Commons or Governmentâ. Serving editors would have a role to play in the writing of a new press standards code, to be undertaken by another new committee. The report claims that its suggestions for legislation do not amount to âstatutory regulationâ. Leveson says that it would âenshrine⌠a legal duty on the Government to protect the freedom of the pressâ and give âbenefits in law⌠to those who subscribed [to the new regulatory body]â. Many newspapers were critical in their reporting of the suggestion of bringing the law into press regulation in any way. Prime Minister David Cameron also said he had âserious misgivingsâ about any statutory interference in press regulation. On relationships between the press and politicians he was more scathing. All parties had âtoo close a relationship with the press in a way which has not been in the public interestâ. The inquiry found no âextensive evidence of police corruptionâ, although the report did criticise the handling of presspolice relationships. Full coverage on: www.inquirelive.co.uk