InQuire visit our website at - www.inquirelive.co.uk
Free
Meetings Mondays 6.15pm SMC
got: rape is rape
comment - page 7
city sound project reviews
iq entertainment - page 17
kindle vs. book
iq culture - page 19
Issue 10.1
top revision hotspots
iq features - page 11
23 May 2014
team kent upcoming events
sport - page 23
marking boycott called off
Charlotte Amelia Smith
THE proposed marking boycott, threatening the degrees of thousands of final year students across the UK, has been called off. On 1 May, the University and College Union (UCU) voted to accept the Universities and Colleges Employers Association’s (UCEA) offer of a pay increase of 1% with the understanding of an increase of 2% the following year. With a 52.6% turnout, the results were 84% vote in support of accepting the renewed offer. On 2 May it was announced that the marking boycott had been officially called off, much to the relief of students all over the country. As a result, there will be no further action taken regarding the national pay scale until 2015/16. While this issue has been resolved for the time being, further talks continue regarding the gender gap, disability leave, the work load and hours, measures to prevent redundancies, and conditions for the hourly paid staff and other forms of casualisation in the sector. The cause of the proposed boycott began last year over disagreements related to university lecturers’ rates of pay. Three unions - UCU, Unison, and Unite - were dissatisfied with the UCEA offer of a pay rise of just 1%. The UCU stated that since 2009 lecturers have received a real terms pay cut of 13%, taking into account the
Lecturers’ taking part in a day long strike earlier this year. Photo by Chris Heron
rate of inflation. The proposed action has resulted in students all over the country fearing how this could affect them in the most important time of year. Tom Russell, a University of Kent Digital Arts student, said: “When paying £9,000 I hold an expectation that when I submit coursework, the university will uphold their end of the deal and allow this year’s marks to contribute to my final grade.”
The boycott, which would have included lecturers refusing to attend preparation meetings in the lead up to exams, would have resulted in great disruption during exam time, and would have left final essays, coursework and dissertations unmarked. This could have potentially resulted in delayed graduation times, running the risk of ‘devalued’ degrees and late final classifications, a particular
concern for those in need of final grades for confirmation of job offers, places on postgraduate study or years abroad. In early April, Kent Union opened a referendum over whether or not to support the marking boycott. The results of the referendum were an overwhelming 640 votes against, compared to only 121 votes in favour. The UKC ‘Stop the Boycott’ online campaign, despite
claiming to sympathise with the position of staff, implored students to vote against the referendum, arguing that “the ramifications of a marking boycott are disastrous to students’ and that it ‘oversteps the line of support Kent Union can lend”. The ‘Fair Pay in Kent HE’ campaign ran alongside ‘Stop the Boycott’ but focused primarily on increasing pay in line with inflation.